Answer:
You need to ether provide more information, or answer options for people to provide an answer.
Explanation:
Double jeopardy is
O a bonus round on a popular television show
the term for when a person is tried for the same crime twice
established by the Constitution as legal and acceptable
none of the above
Out of the choices provided above, it can be concluded to state that the meaning of double jeopardy is accurately described as the term for when a person is tried for the same crime twice. Therefore, the option B holds true.
What is the significance of Double Jeopardy?Double jeopardy can be referred to or considered as a term that is used to describe the situation that an individual cannot be put into trial for the same criminal act more than once after a judgement or verdict with respect to the same has been made by the court of law.
The Constitutional amendment provides protection to the American citizens for being tried twice in the essence of double jeopardy, and is termed as illegal and punishable.
Therefore, the option B holds true and states regarding the significance of double jeopardy.
Learn more about double jeopardy here:
https://brainly.com/question/12229144
#SPJ1
Answer:
B- A term for when a person is tried for the same crime twice.
Explanation:
The purpose of the open door policy proposed by the united states in 1899 was to.
Answer:
You need to ether provide more information, or answer options for people to provide an answer.
Explanation:
which amendments, according to supreme court arguments, have elements of the right to privacy?
The element is found in the fourth amendment.
The Fourth Amendment is essentially a section of the Bill of Rights in the US Constitution.
The Fourth Amendment of the constitution prohibits any arbitrary searches and seizures of a person's possessions, including their homes, belongings, documents, companies, etc.
In conclusion, the fourth Amendment protects American citizens' right to privacy against unjustified government interference.
ZMOT represents having regrets about purchases.
In 2011, Lacinski coined the term "Zero Moment of Truth" (ZMOT). The ZMOT is the stage in the customer's purchase process that has the most influence. This is because ZMOT has an impact on how customers make purchasing decisions. If you can't persuade your customers to purchase from ZMOT, you've already lost the sale.
To know more about amendment, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12124635
#SPJ4
Explain the process of empowerment and delegation in criminal justice organizations. Include the role of trust related to delegation and empowerment.
The process of empowerment and delegation in criminal justice organizations will be from top to bottom or we can say it is from superior to subordinate.
What is delegation?Delegation refers to the shift of authority as well as power from superior to subordinate. Delegation is giving another person the authority to perform a particular activity. It is the process of distributing and delegating work to others and is therefore one of the central concepts of business management.Delegation is the transfer of responsibility for a particular task from one person to another. From a management perspective, delegation occurs when managers assign specific tasks to employees.Hire someone to direct your subordinates and tell them exactly what to do to organize surveys, collect feedback and report back to you so you can make informed decisions.
Thus, by delegating power, authority, and responsibility one can easily empower the criminal justice organizations as one superior is not burdened with all the work instead it is distributed and transferred to every subordinate.
To know more about delegation refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/27823193
#SPJ10
Floyd is riding his bicycle down the street while texting on his phone. floyd does not see vivian, a store owner, who is putting magazines out in front of her storefront. he looks up just in time and swerves to miss vivian but knocks her entire magazine rack and newsstand down, totally destroying it. is floyd liable?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Yes, Vivian has a competent loss and lost money.
Indeed, Vivian suffered a legitimate loss and lost money. Yes, liable
What is money?Money is a trade good accepted by general consent as a medium of economic conversation. It is the medium in which prices and values are expressed. It flows from person to person and country to country, making trade, and it is the debt measure of wealth. Money is any good that is widely used and accepted in written accounts involving the transfer of goods and divine service from one person to another.
Maybe doing something very likely to accomplish anything When we are weary, we are all more likely to make mistakes. The bridge could fall down at any time. liable to something is that you are likely to be impacted by it. If you exercise infrequently, you are more likely to get hurt.
Therefore, a legitimate loss and lost money. Yes, liable
Learn more about money here:
https://brainly.com/question/22984856
#SPJ2
in what case did the supreme court rule that the defendant does not have a right to receive a copy of the presentence investigation report?
In what case did the supreme court rule that the defendant does not have a right to receive a copy of the presentence investigation report Willems v. New York.
What could be found in a report on a presentence investigation?Generally speaking, the presentence report must include information about the alleged crime as well as the defendant's past criminal activity. The PSI must also include information about the defendant's health, finances, employment history, military experience, and family and personal background.
What does the presentence investigation report serve as?The most crucial document in the federal criminal procedure has been referred to as the presentence investigation report. Even while its major objective is to aid the court in choosing the proper sentence, its significance in decision-making following the conviction cannot be understated.
To Know more about Willems v.
https://brainly.com/question/5212542
#SPJ4
PLEASEEEE HELP 20 POINTS
Noah would like to work in a courtroom. He's very interested in legal matters and historic court cases. He would like to preside over juvenile cases and decide on the best course of disposition for the crimes. Which career would Noah most likely be interested in?
Probation officer
Detention intake screener
Youth development specialist
Judge
Noah is most likely interested in the career of a judge. Thus, option D is correct.
What is a courtroom?A courtroom can be defined as the place where the judge or people usually go in to get a decision for a particular trial.
If I were likely to pursue legal matters but my interest in historical places, then the best course of action should be to become a judge. People would want to know a judge about all the cases that have happened in the past as well as the legal decision-making power that would be a great effect.
Therefore, option D is the correct option.
Learn more about courtroom , here:
https://brainly.com/question/19974203
#SPJ1
Look at the various immigrant visas available. In your opinion, what is the reasoning behind these visa categories? What policy goals do they serve?
Visas are required if you want to travel to a country that does not share a visa policy with your home country. Many countries have visa policies and treaties in place that allow their citizens to freely travel between them without the need for a visa.
What does the phrase "need sponsorship for a Visa" mean?A company's readiness to offer access sponsorship to highly qualified individuals from outside the US is noted. Employers must navigate a challenging process. To sponsor a ticket, they must be able to show that they would require American citizens with the necessary qualifications to work at their entrances.
When asked if they currently or in the future intend to apply for job visa sponsorship, almost all students should respond "yes." Because their CPT or OPT expires, the majority of international graduates will search for H-1B and possibly other work visa sponsorship.
Learn more about visa sponsorship with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/4487826
#SPJ10
a person who had been convicted of a felony 10 years ago was turned down for license. if he still desired a license, what is his next course of action? select one: a. file a new license application with the georgia real estate commission b. request a hearing before the attorney general c. make a personal appeal to the governor d. request a hearing before the real estate commission
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Request a hearing before the real estate commission
Steve files head of household. In 2022, he received $23,000 in social security benefits, $10,000 in taxable retirement income, and $4,000 in interest and dividend income. Using the Social Security Benefits Worksheet - Line 6a and 6b, determine Steve's taxable social security benefits.
The Social Security system will not provide Steve with any benefits that are subject to taxation.
This is further explained below.
What is income?Generally, Because Steve is the head of his family, the portion of his social security income that falls between $25,000 and $34,000 is subject to a tax rate of up to fifty percent.
In the process of computing the limit, retirement income, interest income, and dividend income are not considered to be part of the social security benefits.
Despite this, the social security benefits in the scenario amount to $23,000, which is lower than the limit of $25,000 and is therefore exempt from taxation.
In conclusion, As a result, Steve will get no taxable benefits from the Social Security system.
Read more about income
https://brainly.com/question/14732695
#SPJ1
A driver can be within the legal limit of BAC, but still be impaired.
A. True
B. False
The statement is true as being within the legal BAC limit does not necessarily mean a driver is not impaired.
A driver may be impaired even with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) that is below the legal limit. Different people react to alcohol in different ways, and even a small amount can affect a person's judgment, coordination and reaction time. The degree of impairment can vary depending on a number of variables including tolerance, body weight, metabolism and the presence of other drugs.
Furthermore, impairment can be arbitrary and change depending on how well a person thinks of their own abilities. Therefore, it's crucial to understand that driving safely does not depend on being under the legal limit and that making sensible choices whenever drinking alcohol should always come first.
learn more about legal BAC limit here
brainly.com/question/10579816
#SPJ2
Identify a true statement about the Bill of Rights.
a) It originally had a set of six amendments sent by the First Congress to the
states for ratification.
b) it states that the right to no excessive bail and fines is applicable to all states.
c) It originally applied only to the U.S. national government, but now most of it
applies likewise to State governments.
d) It exclusively covers the first six amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
The state constitution provides the people the opportunity to directly vote on whether to accept or reject a proposed law. This is known as a.
People having the opportunity to directly vote on whether to accept or reject a proposed law is known as Referendum.
What is a Referendum?
A referendum is a ballot that is voted on by the general population of a city, county, or state. It means that a political question is passed on to the people to decide rather than a legislative body.
Referendums are not allowed at the federal level in the U.S. government, but state and local governments can use them. They are usually put on the general ballot during most elections. Referendums are one of several forms of exercising ''direct democracy.'' This is the governmental practice of operating according to the will of the people. Mostly, referendums and other forms of direct democracy are used to decide issues rather than to elect politicians.However, referendums are meant to repeal or affirm laws created by legislatures. Referendums are considered effective for overruling legislative decisions that are unpopular.The process of using a referendum is:
A state or local legislature comes to a policy decision, or a sufficient number of citizens propose a policy. Many times, proposals (or initiatives) are created by citizen interest groups, such as civil rights groups.
Policy decisions are offered to the people on a ballot (usually as part of a general election).
The popular vote is tallied, and the opinion of the majority is followed.
Learn more about Referendums here:
https://brainly.com/question/15604110
#SPJ4
If you steal your entire speech from another source and present it as if it was your own, you are committing what kind of plagiarism?.
What is the purpose of social control in relation to crime?
It serves to encourage crime.
It serves to increase crime.
It serves to keep crime in check.
It removes the benefits of committing crime.
Answer:
encourage them not to break the law.
In case of each of the following situations, state the conditions, as
specified under the Contract Act, 1872 which must be fulfilled to make a
binding contract.
(i) In February 2014, Raheel promised to pay Rs. 300,000 to Sameer against a
debt of Rs. 500,000 which was due for payment in March 2010. (03)
(ii) Shazia promised to pay Rs. 100,000 to her brother Rauf on account of his
University fees for three years
Is unique beneath the contract Act, of 1872 which needs to be fulfilled to make binding settlement decisions. option A In February 2014, Raheel promised to pay Rs. 300,000 to Sameer in opposition to debt of Rs. 500,000 which turned into a due fee in March 2010.
The Indian agreement Act of 1872 presents proper personnel to the parties who have certain guarantees in an agreement. accordingly, the parties in any such situation can most effectively implement their contractual rights against every different most effective and no longer against the sector at big.
Section 28 of the Indian settlement Act, of 1872 states that an agreement in absolute restraint of criminal proceedings is void. phase 28 (a) of the Indian contract Act, of 1872 states that: No agreement can debar the enforcement of rights via a courtroom of law. No settlement can oust the jurisdiction of a court docket.
Learn more about contracts here
https://brainly.com/question/5746834
#SPJ1
The supreme court’s landmark 1954 decision in brown v. Board of education struck down what doctrine?.
The supreme court’s landmark 1954 decision in brown v. Board of education struck down Separate but Equal doctrine.
Most legal systems have a supreme court's that sits at the top of the court system. These courts have additional names like "court of last resort," "apex court," and "high (or ultimate) court of appeal." In general, a supreme court's decisions are final and cannot be appealed to another court. Education is a deliberate process with certain goals in mind, such as the transmission of knowledge or the development of abilities and moral qualities. Formal, non-formal, and informal education are frequently used to categorize different types of education. Formal education occurs at educational and training facilities, is normally organized around curriculum goals and objectives, and is frequently facilitated by teachers.
Learn more about supreme court’s here :
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ4
1. How can drivers avoid sensory overload?
The five senses of sight, hearing, smell, touch, and taste can become overstimulated, resulting in sensory overload.
Numerous conditions, noises, or images can cause sensory overload. It's possible for different things to overwhelm different people. Loud noises or music are a couple of scenarios that can cause sensory overload.
A few suggestions are to count to 10, go away, listen to music, watch a calming video, or read a book. Create a plan for leaving if you experience sensory overload. If your child begins to feel overwhelmed, discuss with them how they can maintain their composure or shift their surroundings.
To know about visual overload: https://brainly.com/question/4729064
#SPJ1
which is an example of a situation in which the court would likely award punitive damages after a breach of contract?
When fraud occurred the court would likely award punitive damages after a breach of contract.
Punitive damages, also known as exemplary damages or exemplary punishment, are financial penalties imposed on the defendant for egregious behavior and/or as a means of reforming or discouraging future such behavior by the defendant and others. Such behavior was the reason for the litigation. Punitive damages are regarded as punishment and are frequently given at the court's discretion when the defendant's actions are determined to be particularly detrimental. In the legal sense, fraud is the deliberate deception used to get an unfair or illegal advantage or to deny a victim of a legal right. Fraud can be against the law in both civil (a victim of scam may file a lawsuit against the perpetrator to stop the fraud or obtain monetary restitution) and criminal ( (e.g., a fraud perpetrator may be prosecuted and imprisoned by governmental authorities).
Learn more about punitive damages here :
https://brainly.com/question/14265086
#SPJ4
According to blackmun’s decision, why did the crèche display violate the establishment clause?.
According to Blackmun's decision, the crèche display violate the establishment clause because it was located inside a county building.
They argued that the presentations violated the primary change's status quo Clause, which says “Congress shall make no law respecting an established order of religion…” The established order Clause changed intended to prevent the government from establishing a national church, or from interfering in the political opinions of church buildings.
The establishment clause prohibits the government from "organizing" a faith. An appropriate definition of "establishment" is doubtful. Historically, it was supposed to prohibit country-backed church buildings, such as the Church of England.
Learn more about the establishment clause here https://brainly.com/question/14225350
#SPJ4
if a minor injures another person or damages another person’s property, he or she may be liable for such injuries or damages and may be prosecuted by the in a action.
This is true. If a minor is found to have acted or carried certain actions that have led to these they may be prosecuted for this action.
Who is a minor?This is the term that is used to refer to the person that is under the age of 18 years. That is the person is considered to be in their juvenile age and certain laws may not be applied to them.
The negligence of a minor that may result in harm or other forms of destruction on another person can be attributed to their parents. The courts may rule this as the fault of the guardians and the parents that failed to keep an eye on their ward.
Read more on Minor here: https://brainly.com/question/4196231
#SPJ1
Complete question
if a minor injures another person or damages another person’s property, he or she may be liable for such injuries or damages and may be prosecuted by the in a action.
T or F
Indicate whether the issue are those of factor or of law Are there witnesses ? Were there guard rails ? What is in the contract ? Is an oral contract binding ? What caused the fracture ? What is a felony ? Is a doctor licensed ? Should a person offer assistance at the scene of an accident ? Does breaking a window constitute “breaking and entering “ ? Is the driver of a “getaway” car an accomplice to a crime ?
1) It is related to Law
2) It is related to Fact
3) Its is related to Law
4) It is related to Law
5) It is related to Fact
6) It is related to Law
7) It is related to Fact
8) It is related to Fact
9) It is related to Law
10) It is related to Law
1) If the answer is yes, I'd like to tie it to the law because most legal issues require the testimony of witnesses. If the law does not require witnesses, the facts are represented by the sentence "There are witnesses or there is no witness."
2) The issue at hand is whether guard rails are indeed present or not.
3) The Law clearly defines the contract, so the question is whether the contract is valid.
4) Yes, unless the law specifically provides differently, an oral contract is likewise enforceable.
5) This information relates to the fracture's cause or reason.
6) A felony is one of the most serious types of crimes under criminal law, hence it relates to the law.
7) There are laws, rules, and restrictions that apply to doctors who are licensed, but in most cases, simply knowing whether a doctor is licensed or not is more of a fact.
8) Although I am afraid that there is no law that requires someone to help at the scene of an accident, a person should nonetheless offer assistance in accordance with social, moral, and ethical norms. More of a reality than law, then.
9) Maybe both, as it was merely a fact and there was no malicious intent involved. Trespassing-related legal issue or legal issue with intent to commit a crime related to trespassing.
10) Depending on the part the driver took in the crime and/or whether they knew about the crime being committed.
To know more about Fact and law, refer to this link:
https://brainly.com/question/1060740
#SPJ1
Reading the data from the given table of crimes per 1,000 residents, in which year did crime increase at all three levels of government?
2005
2003
2004
2008
Tina Muller applied for a loan with CES Credit Union so that she could buy a car form her brother, Joseph Muller. They both signed the loan contract, with Joseph signing as a cosigner. It was two months before Joseph’s eighteenth birthday. The loan was approved, so Joseph transferred the car to Tina. When she defaulted on the loan, CES repossessed the cear and sold it for less than the loan amount. More than ten years after Joseph cosigned the note, CES sued him for the deficiency. He tried to disaffirm the contract. Could he?
No he would not be able to have to disaffirm the contract.
What is meant by disaffirmance?This is the term that is used to refer to all that has to do with the denial as well as the nullification of the transaction that has been done at an earlier date. It has to do with the repudiation of the transaction that is to be done.
The way that this would have to occur would be through the fact that there would be the avoidance on the settling of an obligation.
There was no contract in this case given that those that have entered a contract would be the persons that would be able to have a voidable contract and would also be able to abide by the contract and also have to disaffirm the contract.
The issue of disaffirmance is known to be done only by a person that is a minor or it could be carried out by one that is within an reasonable time.
Read more on disaffirmance here:
https://brainly.com/question/28098442
#SPJ1
bill has been found guilty of theft. he feels it is unfair because the judge would not let him present certain evidence. he is alleging a violation of the fourteenth amendment?
The 14th Amendment, which was adopted on July 9, 1868, extended the freedoms and rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights to persons who had previously been held in slavery. It was passed by Congress on June 13, 1866.
The 14th Amendment's significance was what?On July 9, 1868, the 14th Amendment became law. The amendment gave citizenship to everyone who were born in the country or who had been naturalized citizens, and it ensured that everyone in the country had access to freedom, due process, and equal protection under the law.
The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment states what.In addition, no state may take away someone's life, liberty, or property without providing them with a fair trial or deny them the equal protection of the law if they are a resident of its territory. No State shall pass or enforce any legislation that restricts the rights or privileges of US citizens.
To Know more about Amendment,
https://brainly.com/question/12124635
#SPJ4
Donald is a very wealthy man. One day, Randy, the owner of a local gas station, compliments Donald on his new luxury car. Donald says: “Because you have given me such great service over the years, I will give you ownership of the car at the end of the week. Just fill up the gas tank.” Randy accepts and gives Donald the gas without charging for it. At the end of the day, Donald has second thoughts. Which of the following is the best answer?
Question 5 options:
A contract has been formed, because Randy’s service over the years is sufficient consideration for Donald’s promise to give the car.
A contract has been formed, because Randy accepted Donald’s offer.
No contract has been formed, because consideration is lacking since the gas was not bargained for in exchange for the car
No contract has been formed, because gas is not sufficient consideration for a car
Answer:
i think "no contract has been formed because consideration is lacking since the gas was not bargained for in exchange for the car"
Explanation:
thats a really weird question to be asked-
To establish proximate cause in a negligence claim, it is necessary to prove that the.
Answer:
You need to ether provide more information, or answer options for people to provide an answer
Explanation:
By judicial interpretation, the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment to the united states constitution __________.
By judicial interpretation, the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment to the united states constitution restricts the federal government.
The Due process Clause of the Fourteenth change is precisely like a similar provision within the 5th change, which best restricts the federal authorities. It states that no man or woman shall be “deprived of life, liberty, or assets without a due method of regulation.” typically, “due manner” refers to truthful strategies.
Delivered to cope with the racial discrimination continued via Black individuals who were recently emancipated from slavery, the amendment showed the rights and privileges of citizenship and, for the first time, assured all people equal protection beneath the legal guidelines.
Learn more about amendment here brainly.com/question/687600
#SPJ4
Instructions: Read the following classic selection: Howard Becker's Becoming a Marijuana User. Explain how differential association and social learning theories apply to the example presented by Becker. What particular aspects of the theories do you see in the study?
The idea of social learning, which contends that social conduct is learnt by witnessing and imitating the behavior of others, is the factor that contributes to the aberrant behavior of marijuana users.
What do "How Becoming a Marijuana User" explained?When Howard Becker wrote "How to Become a Marijuana User," marijuana use was not as "mainstream" as it is today. Instead of discussing whether or not to legalize it back then, people were trying to understand how this drug fit into society.
In his essay, Becker makes the case that marijuana use, not marijuana users themselves, are the deviant individuals who engage in deviant behavior.
Thus, The idea of social learning, which contends that social conduct.
For more information about Marijuana User, click here
https://brainly.com/question/28957723
#SPJ1
______ is defined as the power to declare a government action unconstitutional, and is one of the oldest and perhaps most important responsibilities of the judicial branch.
The power of judicial review is defined as the power to declare a government action unconstitutional, and is one of the oldest and perhaps most important responsibilities of the judicial branch.
Constitutionality is defined as the state of being in line with the laws or provisions of the applicable constitution;[1] it is also the status of a legislation, a procedure, or an act being in conformity with those laws or provisions. They are unconstitutional when policies, practices, or actions directly contravene the constitution. Unless a government has a system in place for declaring legislation unlawful, all other laws are regarded as constitutional.
A measure passed as law by the national legislature or a lower-level legislature, like the legislature of a state or province, may be ruled to be unconstitutional. The constitution, which is the document that defines the government, also contains laws that must be upheld by governments.
Learn more about judicial branch here
https://brainly.com/question/9696040
#SPJ4