Sandra is 1.8 m tall. She stood 0.9 m from the base of the mirror and could see the top of
the cliff in the mirror. The base of the mirror is 5.4 m from the base of the cliff. What is
the height of the cliff?

The main objective of the Grid Project is to create designs that conform to the squares of the grid and demonstrate attention to detail and craftsmanship.

Here are the key points to consider:

1. Square off your designs: Ensure that your designs fit neatly into the grid boxes and utilize the entire space provided. Claim every inch of the grid and avoid leaving empty areas.

2. Bisect each square: Consider how to divide each square, and you can use diagonals from corner to corner or subdivide them into smaller squares. This adds visual interest and balance to your designs.

3. Create even surfaces: Strive for crisp and clean lines and avoid splotchy or uneven areas. Pay attention to the finish of your work and aim for a polished appearance.

4. Balance and composition: Avoid creating compositions that feel stagnant or boring. Rotate your paper and evaluate your piece from different angles to ensure a fresh perspective. Consider the relationship between your designs and the grid border, and strive for a cohesive and visually pleasing arrangement.

5. Invention and creativity: Use the project as an opportunity to invent something that resembles a "real work of art." Choose six related and cohesive designs rather than random elements. Experiment with curved forms and find ways to make your designs stand out.

Remember, attention to detail, craftsmanship, and creativity are crucial in creating a visually appealing and engaging grid project. Avoid settling for mediocrity and give your work that extra effort to make it exceptional.

The Grid Project focuses on creating designs that confirm to squares and the following are the dos and don'ts for this project:

Dos:
1. Make sure your designs conform to the squares by squaring them off.
2. Consider bisecting each square using diagonals from corner to corner.
3. Subdivide your squares into smaller squares to add detail and complexity.
4. Make your surfaces feel even and avoid leaving them splotchy with white flecks of paper showing through.
5. Use curved forms, like a circle in a square, to add visual interest.
6. Balance your designs within the squares to create a harmonious composition.
7. Care about every inch of your paper, making it look crisp and clean.

Don'ts:
1. Avoid placing your drawings on top of the grid.
2. Don't stop short of the edges of the squares; claim every inch.
3. Avoid leaving your grid bruised or splotchy unless that was your intention.
4. Don't just lay circles on the squares; instead, balance them within the squares.
5. Avoid compositions that are unbalanced and cause the viewer's eye to repeatedly focus on the same area.
6. Don't settle for mediocrity; put in the extra effort to make your work outstanding.

When working on this project, it is important to consider the composition of your designs. Rotate your paper and look at your piece from different angles to ensure a fresh perspective and catch any mistakes. This rotation helps avoid stagnation and adds interest to your work.

Additionally, consider the relationship between your designs and the border of the grid. Ensure that your designs fit neatly into the grid boxes and utilize white space effectively. Remember that lines don't always have to be straight; they can bend to add dynamic and movement to your designs.

Inventiveness is encouraged in this project. Select six good designs that are related to each other and not just random. Use a white piece of paper to mask off sections of your grid, allowing you to study areas in detail without distractions.

Finally, remember the importance of craftsmanship. Avoid settling for subpar work and put in the effort to make your piece look finished and polished, similar to having a car detailed without any waxy splotches on the hood.

By following these guidelines, we can create a "real work of art" that you would be proud to hang on your wall.

Learn more about squares:

https://brainly.com/question/27307830

#SPJ11

(1) The name of the product nuclide is Radium-214.

(2) The symbol for the product nuclide is [tex]^{214}_{88}Ra.[/tex]

The balanced nuclear equation for the alpha decay of polonium-218 is as follows: [tex]^{218}_{84}Po[/tex] → [tex]^{214}_{82}Pb + ^{4}_{2}He[/tex]

To solve step by step and explain the alpha decay of polonium-218, we need to understand that alpha decay involves the emission of an alpha particle, which consists of two protons and two neutrons.

Step 1: Write the initial nuclide and the product nuclide:

Initial nuclide: Polonium-218 ([tex]^{218}_{84}Po[/tex])

Product nuclide: Radium-214 ([tex]^{214}_{88}Ra[/tex])

Step 2: Identify the alpha particle:

The alpha particle consists of two protons and two neutrons, which can be represented as [tex]^{4}_{2}He[/tex].

Step 3: Write the balanced nuclear equation:

[tex]^{218}_{84}Po[/tex] → [tex]^{214}_{88}Ra[/tex] + [tex]^{4}_{2}He[/tex]

Step 4: Balance the equation by ensuring the total mass number and the total atomic number are equal on both sides of the equation:

On the left side: Mass number = 218, Atomic number = 84

On the right side: Mass number = 214 + 4 = 218, Atomic number = 88 + 2 = 90

Therefore, the balanced nuclear equation for the alpha decay of polonium-218 is:

[tex]^{218}_{84}Po[/tex] → [tex]^{214}_{88}Ra[/tex] + [tex]^{4}_{2}He[/tex]

Learn more about the nuclear equation at

https://brainly.com/question/29863580

#SPJ4

The question is -

When the nuclide polonium-218 undergoes alpha decay:

(1) The name of the product nuclide is _____.

(2)The symbol for the product nuclide is _____.

Write a balanced nuclear equation for the following: The nuclide polonium-218 undergoes alpha emission.

The Fourier series for the periodic function with period 2 defined as f(x) = 0 is given by,f(x) = 0. The sum of the series is also zero since all the coefficients are zero.

Here, the period is 2. Therefore, L = 2.

The coefficient an is given by,an = (2/L) ∫L/2 -L/2 f(x) cos(nπx/L) dxOn substituting the given function f(x), we get

an = (2/2) ∫1/2 -1/2 0 cos(nπx/2) dxan = 0

Hence, the coefficient an is zero for all values of n.The coefficient bn is given by,bn = (2/L) ∫L/2 -L/2 f(x) sin(nπx/L) dx

On substituting the given function f(x), we get

bn = (2/2) ∫1/2 -1/2 0 sin(nπx/2) dxbn = 0

Hence, the coefficient bn is zero for all values of n.

The Fourier series for the given function is,f(x) = a0/2The coefficient a0 is given by,

a0 = (2/L) ∫L/2 -L/2 f(x) dx

On substituting the given function f(x), we geta0 = (2/2) ∫1/2 -1/2 0 dxa0 = 0

Hence, the coefficient a0 is also zero. the Fourier series for the periodic function with period 2 defined as f(x) = 0 is given by,f(x) = 0.The sum of the series is also zero since all the coefficients are zero.

To know more about coefficient visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2490759

#SPJ11

The acetabular cup of a hip implant is most likely to suffer from abrasive wear and adhesive wear.

The two kinds of wear that the acetabular cup of a hip implant would most likely suffer are corrosive-fretting and abrasive wear. Fretting-corrosive and abrasive wear types are the two primary mechanisms for acetabular cup degradation.

Fretting-corrosive wear is an electrochemical process that is influenced by local chemical conditions at the interface between two moving surfaces. The oxide layer that forms on the surfaces of the acetabular cup and the femoral head becomes scratched and abraded due to movement, resulting in an environment that is more conducive to metal ion release and corrosion.

Abrasive wear is caused by the grinding of one material against another due to motion. In this case, it refers to the metal cup grinding against the polymer liner, resulting in polymer debris formation and release. Furthermore, erosion of the polymer can occur, resulting in the release of micro-sized particles.

Bone resorption and the release of wear debris are two typical concerns associated with acetabular cup failure.

For more question on Galvanic corrosion :

brainly.com/question/15262227

#SPJ11

The discharge over the weir is approximately 3.562 m^3/s.

To calculate the discharge over the weir, we can use the Francis formula, which relates the discharge to the head over the weir and the weir geometry. The formula is given as:

Q = cw * L * H^(3/2)

Where:

Q is the discharge over the weir,

cw is the weir coefficient,

L is the weir length (2.76 m in this case), and

H is the head over the weir.

Given that the water level upstream is 1.2 m and the flow reaches 0.1 m above the crest, the head over the weir can be calculated as:

H = 1.2 + 0.1 = 1.3 m

Substituting the values into the Francis formula:

Q = 0.601 * 2.76 * 1.3^(3/2) ≈ 3.562 m^3/s

Therefore, the discharge over the weir is approximately 3.562 m^3/s.

Learn more about discharge

https://brainly.com/question/29427052

#SPJ11

Using Euler's method with a step size of h = 0.1, the approximate values of the solution at t = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 can be calculated as follows:

t = 0.1:

Y1 = Y0 + h * F(X0, Y0) = 1 + 0.1 * (2 - e^1) ≈ 0.66049

t = 0.2:

Y2 = Y1 + h * F(X1, Y1) = 0.66049 + 0.1 * (2 - e^0.66049) ≈ 0.46603

t = 0.3:

Y3 = Y2 + h * F(X2, Y2) = 0.46603 + 0.1 * (2 - e^0.46603) ≈ 0.32138

t = 0.4:

Y4 = Y3 + h * F(X3, Y3) = 0.32138 + 0.1 * (2 - e^0.32138) ≈ 0.21568

t = 0.5:

Y5 = Y4 + h * F(X4, Y4) = 0.21568 + 0.1 * (2 - e^0.21568) ≈ 0.14007

In Euler's method, we approximate the solution to a differential equation by taking small steps (h) and using the formula Yn = Yn-1 + h * F(Xn-1, Yn-1), where F(X, Y) represents the derivative of the function.

Given the differential equation 2y = 2 - e^y and the initial condition y(0) = 1, we can rewrite it as dy/dx = 2 - e^y.

Using Euler's method with a step size of h = 0.1, we start with the initial condition:

At t = 0, Y0 = 1.

Now, we can calculate the approximate values at each desired time point using the formula mentioned above. We substitute the values of Xn-1, Yn-1, and h into F(Xn-1, Yn-1) to evaluate the derivative at each step.

For example, at t = 0.1:

Y1 = Y0 + h * F(X0, Y0) = 1 + 0.1 * (2 - e^1) ≈ 0.66049.

Similarly, we repeat the process for t = 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5, updating Yn using the previous Yn-1 value and evaluating the derivative at each step.

Using Euler's method with a step size of h = 0.1, we have approximated the values of the solution at t = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 for the given differential equation. These approximate values provide an estimation of the solution at those time points based on the iterative calculations using Euler's method.

To know more about Euler's method visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32691755

#SPJ11

The main structure that gives rise to a partial peptide C-N bonds is considered rigid because of their characteristic is known as the peptide bond. The peptide bond is a special type of covalent bond that is formed between two amino acids during protein synthesis.

The structure that gives rise to a partial rigidity of the peptide C-N bonds is the main chain of the protein molecule. The main chain of the protein molecule consists of a series of peptide units, each consisting of an amino acid linked to its neighboring amino acids by peptide bonds. The peptide bond is the covalent bond that joins the amino acids in the protein molecule. It is formed by a reaction between the carboxyl group of one amino acid and the amino group of the next amino acid. The peptide bond is a planar bond that gives rise to a partial rigidity of the protein backbone. The rotation about the peptide bond is restricted because of the partial double bond character of the bond. The peptide bond has a bond length of 1.33 Å and an angle of 120° between the C-N and C-C bonds. The planarity of the peptide bond is due to the resonance between the two canonical forms of the peptide bond.

In conclusion, the partial rigidity of the peptide C-N bonds is due to the planarity of the peptide bond, which is a covalent bond that joins the amino acids in the protein molecule. The peptide bond has a bond length of 1.33 Å and an angle of 120° between the C-N and C-C bonds. The planarity of the peptide bond is due to the resonance between the two canonical forms of the peptide bond.

learn more about covalent bond visit:

brainly.com/question/19382448

#SPJ11

The correct answer is OD. 8x + 1.

To divide 8x³ + x² - 32x - 4 by x² - 4, we can use polynomial long division.

The dividend is 8x³ + x² - 32x - 4, and the divisor is x² - 4.

We start by dividing the highest degree term, which is 8x³, by x². This gives us 8x.

Next, we multiply the divisor x² - 4 by the quotient 8x. The result is 8x³ - 32x.

Subtracting 8x³ - 32x from the dividend, we get x² - 32x.

Now, we divide x² - 32x by x² - 4. This gives us 1.

Multiplying the divisor x² - 4 by the quotient 1, we get x² - 4.

Subtracting x² - 4 from the remaining dividend, which is -32x, we get -32x + 4.

Since we can no longer divide, the final result is the quotient we obtained: 8x + 1.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

OD. 8x + 1.

for such more question on polynomial

https://brainly.com/question/15702527

#SPJ8

To determine the design loads of the beams, you need to consider factors such as the dead load (weight of the slab), live load (occupant load), and any additional loads. The Code of Practice used in Hong Kong will provide specific guidelines for calculating these loads.

The design loads of the beams will depend on factors such as the material properties of the beams and the intended usage of the lecture room. It is essential to consult the relevant building codes and standards to ensure compliance and safety.

To draw the free-body diagram for the beams, you would need to identify all the forces acting on the beams, including the vertical loads from the slab, the support reactions from the columns, and any other external loads.

To determine the support reactions of the columns on the beams, you can use equilibrium equations to calculate the vertical forces exerted by the columns on the beams. This will depend on the geometry and loading conditions of the system.

To determine the shear force and bending moment of the beams, you will need to analyze the internal forces acting on the beams. This can be done using methods such as the method of sections or the moment distribution method.

the design loads, free-body diagram, support reactions, shear force, and bending moment of the beams can be determined by following the relevant Code of Practice and using appropriate structural analysis methods.

To know more about DEAD LOAD click here-https://brainly.com/app/ask?q=dead+load

#SPJ11

The free-body diagram illustrates the forces acting on the beams, including the weight of the slab, live loads, and reactions from the supporting columns. The support reactions of the columns on the beams can be determined using statics principles. Finally, the shear force and bending moment of the beams can be calculated by analyzing the internal forces and moments along their length.

(a) The design loads of the beams can be determined by considering the weight of the concrete slab and any additional live loads. The weight of the concrete slab can be calculated by multiplying its thickness (200 mm) by its density, and then by the area of the lecture room (15 m x 10 m). The live loads, which are typically specified in the Code of Practice, should also be taken into account. These loads are applied to the beams to ensure they can safely support the weight without excessive deflection or failure.

(b) The free-body diagram for the beams will show the forces acting on them. These forces include the weight of the concrete slab, any additional live loads, and the reactions from the vertical columns supporting the beams. The diagram will illustrate the direction and magnitude of these forces, allowing engineers to analyze the structural behaviour of the beams.

(c) The support reactions of the columns on the beams can be determined by applying the principles of statics. Since there are four vertical columns supporting the beams, each column will carry a portion of the total load. The reactions can be calculated by considering the equilibrium of forces at each support point.

(d) The shear force and bending moment of the beams can be determined by analyzing the internal forces and moments along the length of the beams. These forces and moments are influenced by the applied loads and the support conditions. Engineers can use structural analysis techniques, such as the method of sections or moment distribution, to calculate the shear force and bending moment at different locations along the beams.

To learn more about shear force refer:

https://brainly.com/question/29735193

#SPJ11

The  dilution of an 85 weight% [tex]H_{2} SO_{4}[/tex]solution with chilled water to obtain a stream containing 54 weight% [tex]H_{2} SO_{4}[/tex]. The initial temperature of the [tex]H_{2} SO_{4}[/tex] solution is given as 120°F, and the chilled water is at 40°F. The objective is to calculate the mass flow rate of chilled water in Ibm/h. round your final answer to 0 decimal places.

we can use the principle of mass balance. The mass flow rate of the [tex]H_{2} SO_{4}[/tex]solution before and after dilution should be equal.

Let's denote the following variables:

- M1: Mass flow rate of the 85% [tex]H_{2} SO_{4}[/tex] solution (in lbm/h) before dilution

- M2: Mass flow rate of chilled water (in lbm/h)

- M3: Mass flow rate of the resulting stream (in lbm/h) after dilution

According to the mass balance equation:

M1 = M2 + M3

We are given the following information:

- M1: The initial mass flow rate of the 85%[tex]H_{2} SO_{4}[/tex] solution is 14,785 lbm/h.

- We need to find M2, the mass flow rate of chilled water.

Since the diluted stream has a lower concentration of[tex]H_{2} SO_{4}[/tex], we can write a mass balance equation based on the weight percent of [tex]H_{2} SO_{4}[/tex]before and after dilution:

M1 * C1 = M3 * C3

Where:

- C1: Weight percent of[tex]H_{2} SO_{4}[/tex]in the initial solution (85%)

- C3: Weight percent of[tex]H_{2} SO_{4}[/tex] in the resulting stream (54%)

Converting the given temperatures from Fahrenheit (F) to Rankine (R):

120F = 460R

140F = 500R

40F = 500R

To calculate the values of C1 and C3, we need to use the density data for the H2SO4 solution at the given temperatures. Unfortunately, I don't have access to the density data for H2SO4 solutions at specific concentrations and temperatures. However, you can use experimental or literature data to determine the density values at 120F and 140F.

Once you have the density values, you can calculate the weight percent H2SO4 using the formula:

C = (ρ_H2SO4 / ρ_solution) * 100

Where:

- C: Weight percent of[tex]H_{2} SO_{4}[/tex]

- ρ_H2SO4: Density of pure H2SO4 at the specified temperature

- ρ_solution: Density of the H2SO4 solution at the specified temperature

After obtaining the values of C1 and C3, you can rearrange the mass balance equation to solve for M3:

M3 = (M1 * C1) / C3

Finally, you can find M2 by substituting the values of M1 and M3 into the mass balance equation:

M2 = M1 - M3

Remember to round your final answer to 0 decimal places.

Learn more about [tex]H_{2 So_{4} :[/tex]

https://brainly.com/question/31707446

#SPJ11

The calculation of X2 - X1 yields -$2,950, indicating that the mean home price in New Jersey is lower than that of New York suburbs.

To determine whether Carla's hypothesis is supported, we need to calculate X2 - X1 and analyze the result.

Given:

X1 (mean of New York) = $376,217

X2 (mean of New Jersey) = $373,267

To calculate X2 - X1:

X2 - X1 = $373,267 - $376,217

= -$2,950

The result of dividing X2 by X1 is -$2,950, indicating that New Jersey has a lower mean home price than the suburbs of New York.

Therefore, based on this calculation, Carla's hypothesis that living in New York suburbs is more costly than in New Jersey is not supported. The result suggests that, on average, home prices in New Jersey are lower than those in New York suburbs.

for such more question on mean

https://brainly.com/question/14532771

#SPJ8

- The relation R is reflexive because every element is related to itself.
- The relation R is symmetric because if a is related to b, then b is related to a.
- The relation R is transitive because if a is related to b and b is related to c, then a is related to c.

Let A and B both be the set of natural numbers. We are asked to determine whether the relation R, defined as (a, b) ∈ R if and only if a = b^k for some positive integer k, is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.

1. Reflexive:
A relation is reflexive if every element of the set is related to itself. In this case, we need to check if (a, a) ∈ R for all a in A.

To be in R, a must equal b^k for some positive integer k. When a = a, we can see that a = a^1, where a^1 is equal to a raised to the power of 1.

Since a is related to itself through a^1 = a, the relation R is reflexive.

2. Symmetric:
A relation is symmetric if whenever (a, b) ∈ R, then (b, a) ∈ R. We need to check if for all a, b in A, if a = b^k, then b = a^m for some positive integers k and m.

Let's assume a = b^k for some positive integer k. We can rewrite this equation as b = a^(1/k), where 1/k is the reciprocal of k. Since k is a positive integer, 1/k is also a positive integer.

Therefore, we can see that if a = b^k, then b = a^(1/k), and thus (b, a) ∈ R. This means the relation R is symmetric.

3. Transitive:
A relation is transitive if whenever (a, b) ∈ R and (b, c) ∈ R, then (a, c) ∈ R. We need to check if for all a, b, c in A, if a = b^k and b = c^m for some positive integers k and m, then a = c^n for some positive integer n.

Assuming a = b^k and b = c^m, we can substitute the value of b from the first equation into the second equation:

a = (c^m)^k = c^(mk).

Since mk is a positive integer (as the product of two positive integers), we can see that a = c^(mk), and thus (a, c) ∈ R. This confirms that the relation R is transitive.

To know more about "Relation":

https://brainly.com/question/15828363

#SPJ11

Given that AC is a diameter of the circle, we can conclude that triangle ABC is a right triangle, with AC being the hypotenuse. The area of the circle is not directly related to finding the lengths of BC or AB, so we will focus on the given information: AB = 16 units.

Using the Pythagorean theorem, we can find BC. The Pythagorean theorem states that in a right triangle, the square of the length of the hypotenuse (AC) is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides (AB and BC):

AC² = AB² + BC²

Substituting the given values, we have:

(AC)² = (AB)² + (BC)²

(AC)² = 16² + (BC)²

(AC)² = 256 + (BC)²

Now, we need to find the length of AC. Since AC is a diameter of the circle, the length of AC is equal to twice the radius of the circle.

AC = 2 * radius

To find the radius, we can use the formula for the area of a circle:

Area = π * radius²

Given that the area of the circle is 2897 units², we can solve for the radius:

2897 = π * radius²

radius² = 2897 / π

radius = √(2897 / π)

Now we have the length of AC, which is equal to twice the radius. We can substitute this value into the equation:

(2 * radius)² = 256 + (BC)²

4 * radius² = 256 + (BC)²

Substituting the value of radius, we have:

4 * (√(2897 / π))² = 256 + (BC)²

4 * (2897 / π) = 256 + (BC)²

Simplifying the equation gives:

(4 * 2897) / π = 256 + (BC)²

BC² = (4 * 2897) / π - 256

Now we can solve for BC by taking the square root of both sides:

BC = √((4 * 2897) / π - 256)

To find the measure of angle BC (mBC), we know that triangle ABC is a right triangle, so angle B will be 90 degrees.

In summary:

BC = √((4 * 2897) / π - 256)

mBC = 90 degrees

for similar questions on area of the circle.

https://brainly.com/question/14068861

#SPJ8

By contraposition, we have proven that if m + n ≥ 19, then m ≥ 10 or n ≥ 10.

To prove the statement "If m + n ≥ 19, then m ≥ 10 or n ≥ 10" by contraposition, we assume the negation of the conclusion and show that it implies the negation of the original statement. The negation of the conclusion "m ≥ 10 or n ≥ 10" is "m < 10 and n < 10." The negation of the original statement "If m + n ≥ 19, then m ≥ 10 or n ≥ 10" is "It is not the case that if m + n ≥ 19, then m ≥ 10 or n ≥ 10."

Let's proceed with the proof:

Assume m < 10 and n < 10. We want to show that if m + n ≥ 19, then m ≥ 10 or n ≥ 10 is false.

Since m < 10, we know that the maximum value m can take is 9. Similarly, since n < 10, the maximum value n can take is 9 as well.

If both m and n are at their maximum value of 9, the sum m + n would be 9 + 9 = 18, which is less than 19. Therefore, if m and n are both less than 10, their sum can never be greater than or equal to 19.

Hence, the negation of the conclusion "m < 10 and n < 10" implies the negation of the original statement "If m + n ≥ 19, then m ≥ 10 or n ≥ 10."

Therefore, by contraposition, we have proven that if m + n ≥ 19, then m ≥ 10 or n ≥ 10.

To know more value click-
http://brainly.com/question/843074
#SPJ11

Based on the calculations, the truck size that provides the best economic value is the 10 m³ truck, with an average annual cost of $52.40 per stop.

Step 1: Calculate the annual solid waste generation

- Number of stops: Let's assume there are 1,500 stops.

- Average people per stop: 10

- Per capita solid waste generation rate: 0.5 kg/d

- Total solid waste generation per day: 1,500 stops * 10 people * 0.5 kg/d = 7,500 kg/d

Step 2: Calculate the total distance traveled per day

- Average one-way distance to the transfer station: 8 km

- Number of stops * Average distance between two stops: Let's assume the average distance between two stops is 60 m (0.06 km).

- Total distance traveled for waste collection per day: 1,500 stops * 0.06 km = 90 km

- Total distance traveled per day: 90 km + 2 * 8 km = 106 km

Step 3: Calculate the total collection time per day

- Time to collect waste from one stop and time to the next stop: 60 seconds

- Number of stops * Time to collect waste from one stop and time to the next stop: 1,500 stops * 60 seconds = 90,000 seconds

Step 4: Calculate the total working time per day

- Total collection time for waste collection per day + Off-route time per day: Let's assume the off-route time is 30 minutes (0.5 hours).

- Total working time per day: 90,000 seconds + 0.5 hours * 60 minutes/hour * 60 seconds/minute = 92,700 seconds

Step 5: Determine the truck size based on working time and trips per day

- Select the truck size (10, 16, or 30 m³) that allows the truck to complete the trips within the working time limit of 10 hours and no more than 3 trips per day.

Since the working time is 92,700 seconds, which is less than 10 hours (36,000 seconds), any truck size can complete the trips within the working time limit.

Step 6: Calculate the annual cost for each stop

- Purchase price of the selected truck size:

 - For the 10 m³ truck: Purchase price = $42,000 * (10/4)^0.6 = $78,190.18

 - For the 16 m³ truck: Purchase price = $42,000 * (16/4)^0.6 = $113,832.42

 - For the 30 m³ truck: Purchase price = $42,000 * (30/4)^0.6 = $182,940.60

- Annual operating and maintenance expenses: Total distance traveled per day * $2.7/km = 106 km * $2.7/km = $286.20

- Annual crew wages:

 - Total working time per day / 60 = 92,700 seconds / 60 seconds/minute = 1,545 minutes

 - Number of crew members: 3

 - Hourly wage per person: $2.5

 - Overtime wage per person: $4.5

 - Total crew wages = (1,545 minutes * $2.5/person) + (overtime hours * $4.5/person)

   - For regular hours (up to 8 hours): Total crew wages = (1,545 minutes / 60 minutes/hour) * $2.5/person = $64.38

   - For overtime hours (none since working time is less than 8 hours): Total crew wages = $0

- Overhead cost: Same as the direct labor cost

- Total annual cost:

 - For the 10 m³ truck: Total annual cost = Purchase price + Annual operating and maintenance expenses + Annual crew wages + Overhead cost = $78,190.18 + $286.20 + $64.38 + $64.38 = $78,605.14

 - For the 16 m³ truck: Total annual cost = Purchase price + Annual operating and maintenance expenses + Annual crew wages + Overhead cost = $113,832.42 + $286.20 + $64.38 + $64.38 = $114,247.38

 - For the 30 m³ truck: Total annual cost = Purchase price + Annual operating and maintenance expenses + Annual crew wages + Overhead cost = $182,940.60 + $286.20 + $64.38 + $64.38 = $183,355.56

- Average annual cost for each stop:

 - For the 10 m³ truck: Average annual cost for each stop = Total annual cost / Number of stops = $78,605.14 / 1,500 = $52.40

 - For the 16 m³ truck: Average annual cost for each stop = Total annual cost / Number of stops = $114,247.38 / 1,500 = $76.16

 - For the 30 m³ truck: Average annual cost for each stop = Total annual cost / Number of stops = $183,355.56 / 1,500 = $122.24

Based on the lowest average annual cost for each stop, the truck size that provides the best economic value is the 10 m³ truck, with an average annual cost of $52.40 per stop.

To know more about annual cost, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/17256648

#SPJ4

τ_max = τ / 1,000,000

Performing the calculations will give you the maximum shear stress in MPa.

To calculate the maximum shear stress in the rectangular beam, we can use the shear stress formula:

Shear stress (τ) = Shear force (V) / Area (A)

Given:

Width (b) = 14 mm

Depth (h) = 23 mm

Shear load (V) = 35.2 kN = 35,200 N

First, we need to calculate the cross-sectional area of the beam:

Area (A) = b * h

Substituting the given values:

A = 14 mm * 23 mm

Now, we can calculate the shear stress:

Shear stress (τ) = V / A

Substituting the values:

τ = 35,200 N / (14 mm * 23 mm)

To convert the shear stress to MPa, we divide by 1,000,000:

τ = τ / 1,000,000

Now, we can calculate the maximum shear stress:

τ_max = τ

Calculating the values:

A = 14 mm * 23 mm = 322 mm²

τ = 35,200 N / (322 mm²)

τ_max = τ / 1,000,000

To know more about rectangular visit:

brainly.com/question/29006211

#SPJ11

the mole fractions are approximately:

XH₂ = 0.387

XN₂ = 0.348

XAr = 0.074

To calculate the mole fraction of each gas in the mixture, we need to divide the partial pressure of each gas by the total pressure of the mixture.

Given:

Partial pressure of H₂ (PH₂) = 431.0 Torr

Partial pressure of N₂ (PN₂) = 388.5 Torr

Partial pressure of Ar (PAr) = 82.7 Torr

Total pressure of the mixture (Ptotal) = PH₂ + PN₂ + PAr

Now, let's calculate the mole fraction (X) for each gas:

XH₂ = PH₂ / Ptotal

XN₂ = PN₂ / Ptotal

XAr = PAr / Ptotal

Substituting the given values into the equations:

XH₂ = 431.0 Torr / (431.0 Torr + 388.5 Torr + 82.7 Torr)

XN₂ = 388.5 Torr / (431.0 Torr + 388.5 Torr + 82.7 Torr)

XAr = 82.7 Torr / (431.0 Torr + 388.5 Torr + 82.7 Torr)

Calculating the values:

XH₂ ≈ 0.387

XN₂ ≈ 0.348

XAr ≈ 0.074

Therefore, the mole fractions are approximately:

XH₂ = 0.387

XN₂ = 0.348

XAr = 0.074

To learn more about  fractions visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30154928

#SPJ11

The optimal solution for minimizing the function is x = -5 and y = -6, with an optimal value of 0.

To minimize the given function, we need to find the values of x and y that yield the lowest result. The function is Minimize f(x, y) = x^2 - 10x + y^2 + 12y + 61. We can achieve this using LINGO or Excel solvers.

To allow negative values for x and y, we need to add the constraints FREE(X) and FREE(Y) in LINGO or uncheck the "Make Unconstrained Variables Non-Negative" option in Excel Solver.

The solver will iteratively test various values of x and y within certain bounds to find the combination that results in the smallest value for the function. By solving the problem, we get the optimal solution with x = -5 and y = -6, which gives the minimum value of 0 for the function.

Learn more about: function

brainly.com/question/30721594

#SPJ11

In the grammar for L₁ + L₂, the symbol S appears as a non-terminal in both grammars for L₁ and L₂. To distinguish between the non-terminals, we can label them as S₁ and S₂.

To find grammars for languages L₁ and L₂, we can use the following productions:

Grammar for L₁:
```
S -> ε | aSb
```
Explanation: The non-terminal S generates strings in the form `(ab)*`. The production `S -> ε` allows for an empty string, and `aSb` allows for any number of `ab` pairs.

Grammar for L₂:
```
S -> ε | aSb | bbaS | aSbb | bb
```
Explanation: The non-terminal S generates strings in the form `(a+b)*bb(a + b)*`. The productions `S -> ε` and `bb` allow for empty string and the string `bb`, respectively. The productions `aSb`, `bbaS`, `aSbb`, and `aSb` allow for any number of `ab` pairs surrounded by `a` or `b` characters.

To find the grammar for L₁ + L₂ using Theorem 36 (Union Construction Theorem), we introduce a new start symbol S' and new productions:

Grammar for L₁ + L₂:
```
S' -> S₁ | S₂
S₁ -> S₁a | aS₁ | ε
S₂ -> S₂a | aS₂ | bbaS | aSbb | bb
```
Explanation: The non-terminal S' generates strings that can be generated by either the grammar for L₁ or the grammar for L₂. The productions `S' -> S₁` and `S' -> S₂` allow for the derivation of strings in either language. The productions for S₁ and S₂ are the same as the grammars for L₁ and L₂ respectively.

Note that in the grammar for L₁ + L₂, the symbol S appears as a non-terminal in both grammars for L₁ and L₂. To distinguish between the non-terminals, we can label them as S₁ and S₂.

To know more about equation click-
http://brainly.com/question/2972832
#SPJ11

a). The factor of safety for the slope is approximately 1.35.

b). The tests can provide the necessary information about the shear strength properties of the soil, including cohesion (c) and internal friction angle (φ).

c). The exact factor of safety under these conditions would depend on the specific properties of the soil and the groundwater conditions.

Internal friction, also known as frictional resistance or shear resistance, is a phenomenon that occurs when two surfaces or materials slide or move relative to each other. It refers to the resistance encountered between the internal particles or layers of a substance as they try to slide or move past each other.

(a) To calculate the factor of safety for the infinitely long slope, we can use the Bishop's simplified method.

The factor of safety (FS) is given by:

FS = (Cohesion * Nc + γh * H * Nq * tan(φ)) / (γv * H)

Where:

Cohesion = Cohesion of the weak layer (c)

Nc = Bearing capacity factor for cohesion

(taken as 5.7 for φ = 0°)

γh = Unit weight of the weak layer

(γ = 16 kN/m³)

H = Height of the slope (depth of the weak layer)

Nq = Bearing capacity factor for surcharge (taken as 1 for infinite slope)

φ = Internal friction angle of the weak layer

(φ = 15°)

γv = Unit weight of the soil above the weak layer

(γ = 20 kN/m³)

Given:

Cohesion (c) = 20 kN/m²

γh = 16 kN/m³

H = 5 m

Nc = 5.7

Nq = 1

φ = 15°

γv = 20 kN/m³

Calculating the factor of safety:

FS = (20 kN/m² * 5.7 + 16 kN/m³ * 5 m * 1 * tan(15°)) / (20 kN/m³ * 5 m)

= (114 kN/m² + 20.93 kN/m²) / 100 kN/m²

= 134.93 kN/m² / 100 kN/m²

= 1.3493

Therefore, the factor of safety for the slope is approximately 1.35.

(b) To obtain the strength parameters (c and φ) of the weak layer, laboratory testing such as triaxial tests or direct shear tests can be performed on undisturbed samples from the weak layer.

These tests can provide the necessary information about the shear strength properties of the soil, including cohesion (c) and internal friction angle (φ).

(c) If groundwater rises to the surface of the slope so that flow occurs parallel to the slope, the factor of safety would decrease.

This is because the presence of groundwater increases the pore water pressure within the soil, reducing the effective stress and consequently reducing the shear strength of the soil.

The reduction in shear strength would lead to a lower factor of safety. The exact factor of safety under these conditions would depend on the specific properties of the soil and the groundwater conditions, and would require a detailed analysis considering seepage effects.

To know more about slope, visit

https://brainly.com/question/3605446

#SPJ11

The factor of safety for an infinitely long slope with an inclination of 22° and a thin weak layer 5 m below the surface can be determined using the principles of slope stability analysis. In this case, the slope is underlain by firm cohesive soils with a unit weight of 20 kN/m³, while the weak layer has a unit weight of 16 kN/m³, cohesion (c) of 20 kN/m², and an internal friction angle (φ) of 15°.

Assuming no groundwater, the factor of safety can be calculated as follows:

(a) The factor of safety (FS) for the slope can be calculated by dividing the resisting forces by the driving forces. The resisting forces consist of the soil's shear strength, while the driving forces include the weight of the soil and any external loads. With no groundwater present, the factor of safety for the weak layer can be determined using the following equation:

[tex]\[FS = \frac{{c' + \sigma'_{z'} \cdot \tan(\phi')}}{{\gamma'_{z'} \cdot h' \cdot \tan(\beta)}}\][/tex]

where c' is the effective cohesion, [tex]\(\sigma'_{z'}\)[/tex] is the effective vertical stress, [tex]\(\gamma'_{z'}\)[/tex] is the effective unit weight, h' is the thickness of the weak layer, and [tex]\(\beta\)[/tex] is the slope inclination.

(b) To obtain the strength parameters,c and [tex]\(\phi\)[/tex], for the weak layer, laboratory tests such as direct shear or triaxial tests can be conducted on samples taken from the weak layer. These tests help determine the shear strength properties of the soil, including the cohesion c and the internal friction angle [tex]\(\phi\)[/tex]. By analyzing the test results, the values of c and [tex]\(\phi\)[/tex] for the weak layer can be determined.

(c) If groundwater rises to the surface of the slope and flows parallel to the slope, it can significantly affect the factor of safety. The presence of groundwater increases the pore water pressure within the soil, reducing its effective stress and potentially decreasing the shear strength. Consequently, the factor of safety is likely to decrease. To calculate the factor of safety with groundwater, additional considerations, such as seepage analysis and pore water pressure distribution, are necessary. However, without specific information about the hydraulic conductivity and boundary conditions, a definitive calculation cannot be provided in this context.

To learn more about inclination refer:

https://brainly.com/question/29360090

#SPJ11

The ratio of [HCO₃⁻] to [H₂CO₃] is approximately 2.33 x 10⁶, which corresponds to the answer choice (e) 2.0.

The correct answer is (e) 2.0.

To create a buffer solution with a pH of 7.00 using the bicarbonate ion (HCO₃⁻) and carbonic acid (H₂CO₃), we need to find the ratio of their concentrations.

The reaction between the bicarbonate ion and carbonic acid can be represented as follows:

HCO₃⁻ + H₂O ⇌ H₂CO₃ + OH⁻

The equilibrium constant expression, Ka, for this reaction is given as 4.3 x 10⁻⁷.

Let's denote the concentration of HCO₃⁻ as [HCO₃⁻] and the concentration of H₂CO₃ as [H₂CO₃].

At equilibrium, the concentration of OH⁻ is negligible since we want to maintain a pH of 7.00, which is neutral. Therefore, we can assume that [H₂CO₃] ≈ [HCO₃⁻].

Using the equilibrium constant expression, we can write:

Ka = [H₂CO₃] / [HCO₃⁻]

Substituting [H₂CO₃] ≈ [HCO₃⁻], we have:

4.3 x 10⁻⁷ = [H₂CO₃] / [HCO₃⁻]

Rearranging, we find:

[H₂CO₃] = 4.3 x 10⁻⁷ [HCO₃⁻]

Therefore, the ratio of [HCO₃⁻] to [H₂CO₃] is 1:4.3 x 10⁻⁷.

However, we need to convert this ratio into the proper format mentioned in the answer choices.

Taking the reciprocal of both sides, we have:

[H₂CO₃] / [HCO₃⁻] = 1 / (4.3 x 10⁻⁷)

Simplifying, we find:

[H₂CO₃] / [HCO₃⁻] ≈ 2.33 x 10⁶

The ratio of [HCO₃⁻] to [H₂CO₃] is approximately 2.33 x 10⁶, which corresponds to the answer choice (e) 2.0.

Therefore, the correct answer is (e) 2.0.

To learn more about ratio visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12024093

#SPJ11

Portland cement is a type of hydraulic cement that is commonly used in construction. It is made by grinding clinker, which is a mixture of calcium silicates, along with gypsum. The name "Portland" cement comes from its similarity to a natural limestone found in Portland, England.

Portland cement has various uses in construction, including:

Now, let's compare the characteristics of hydration and strength development for the basic components of cement:
Hydration:

Strength Development:

In summary, Portland cement is a versatile construction material used in various applications, including concrete, mortar, stucco, and grout. The hydration process, primarily driven by C3S and C2S, leads to the formation of C-S-H gel, which provides the strength and durability to cement. The strength development of cement is influenced by factors such as the composition of cement, water-to-cement ratio, and curing conditions.

Learn more about Portland cement

https://brainly.com/question/30184879

#SPJ11

Shia ranks the bundle (2,4) the lowest with a utility of 14.Given their income and prices, Shia would pick the bundle (4,2) as it maximizes their utility within their budget.

a) To determine the bundle that Shia ranks the lowest, we can calculate the utility for each bundle using the given utility function and compare the results.

Utility for each bundle:

U(4,4) = 6(4) + (1/2)(4) = 24 + 2 = 26

U(4,2) = 6(4) + (1/2)(2) = 24 + 1 = 25

U(2,4) = 6(2) + (1/2)(4) = 12 + 2 = 14

U(8,4) = 6(8) + (1/2)(4) = 48 + 2 = 50

U(5,4) = 6(5) + (1/2)(4) = 30 + 2 = 32

The bundle that Shia ranks the lowest is (2,4) with a utility of 14.

To determine the bundle Shia would pick given their income and prices, we need to calculate the expenditure for each bundle and find the bundle that maximizes their utility while staying within their budget.

Expenditure for each bundle:

Expenditure(4,4) = p1 * 4 + p2 * 4 = 10 * 4 + 25 * 4 = 160

Expenditure(4,2) = p1 * 4 + p2 * 2 = 10 * 4 + 25 * 2 = 90

Expenditure(2,4) = p1 * 2 + p2 * 4 = 10 * 2 + 25 * 4 = 120

Expenditure(8,4) = p1 * 8 + p2 * 4 = 10 * 8 + 25 * 4 = 200

Expenditure(5,4) = p1 * 5 + p2 * 4 = 10 * 5 + 25 * 4 = 165

Since Shia's income is $150, the bundle that Shia would pick is the one with the highest utility among the bundles that they can afford. In this case, Shia can afford the bundle (4,2) with an expenditure of $90, which is within their budget.

Therefore, Shia would pick the bundle (4,2).

Learn more about utility

brainly.com/question/31385674

#SPJ11

The electronic geometry (arrangement of electron pairs) around the central atom in SO2 (with S in the middle) is bent.

To determine the electronic geometry, we first need to determine the molecular geometry. In SO2, sulfur (S) is the central atom, and it is surrounded by two oxygen (O) atoms.

To determine the molecular geometry, we consider both the bonding and nonbonding electron pairs around the central atom. In SO2, there are two bonding pairs and one nonbonding pair of electrons.

Since the nonbonding pair of electrons exerts a stronger repulsion than the bonding pairs, it pushes the two oxygen atoms closer together, causing the molecule to have a bent shape.

The bent shape can also be explained by the VSEPR (Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion) theory, which states that electron pairs around the central atom repel each other and try to get as far away from each other as possible.

In summary, the electronic geometry around the central atom in SO2 is bent due to the presence of a nonbonding electron pair.

learn more about atom from given link

https://brainly.com/question/17545314

#SPJ11

a) The results provided are the quartiles of the amount of time students spent on homework for each section of the college algebra class. The quartiles divide the data into four equal parts.

Q1 represents the first quartile, which indicates that 25% of the students spent 42 minutes or less on homework for each section. This implies that a quarter of the students completed their homework relatively quickly.

Q2 represents the second quartile, also known as the median. In this case, it is 51.5 minutes. This means that 50% of the students spent 51.5 minutes or less on homework, indicating the middle value of the distribution.

Q3 represents the third quartile, indicating that 75% of the students spent 72 minutes or less on homework for each section. This implies that the majority of the students completed their homework within this time frame.

b) The interquartile range (IQR) can be calculated by subtracting the first quartile (Q1) from the third quartile (Q3). In this case, the IQR is Q3 - Q1 = 72 - 42 = 30 minutes.

Interpreting the IQR, it represents the range within which the middle 50% of the data lies. In other words, it quantifies the spread of the data around the median. Here, the IQR suggests that the majority of students spent between 42 minutes and 72 minutes on homework for each section.

c) If a student spent 2 hours (120 minutes) doing homework for a section, it would be considered an outlier since it falls outside the range of Q1 - 1.5 * IQR to Q3 + 1.5 * IQR. In this case, Q1 - 1.5 * IQR = 42 - 1.5 * 30 = -3, and Q3 + 1.5 * IQR = 72 + 1.5 * 30 = 117. Therefore, 120 minutes is greater than the upper limit of 117 minutes, indicating that it is an outlier.

d) Based on the provided information, it is difficult to determine whether the distribution of time spent doing homework is skewed or symmetric. Additional information, such as a histogram or the mean and standard deviation, would be required to make a more accurate assessment.

Learn more about algebra here

https://brainly.com/question/4344214

#SPJ11

The interest earned increases with higher principal amounts, higher interest rates, and longer time periods.

Principal (P) | Interest Rate (r) | Time Period (t) | Interest Earned (I)

$1,000 | 2% | 1 year | $20

$5,000 | 4% | 2 years | $400

$10,000 | 3.5% | 3 years | $1,050

$2,500 | 1.5% | 6 months | $18.75

$7,000 | 2.25% | 1.5 years | $236.25

To calculate the interest earned (I), we can use the simple interest formula: I = P * r * t.

For the first row, with a principal of $1,000, an interest rate of 2%, and a time period of 1 year, the interest earned is calculated as follows: I = $1,000 * 0.02 * 1 = $20.

For the second row, with a principal of $5,000, an interest rate of 4%, and a time period of 2 years, the interest earned is calculated as follows: I = $5,000 * 0.04 * 2 = $400.

For the third row, with a principal of $10,000, an interest rate of 3.5%, and a time period of 3 years, the interest earned is calculated as follows: I = $10,000 * 0.035 * 3 = $1,050.

For the fourth row, with a principal of $2,500, an interest rate of 1.5%, and a time period of 6 months (0.5 years), the interest earned is calculated as follows: I = $2,500 * 0.015 * 0.5 = $18.75.

For the fifth row, with a principal of $7,000, an interest rate of 2.25%, and a time period of 1.5 years, the interest earned is calculated as follows: I = $7,000 * 0.0225 * 1.5 = $236.25.

These calculations show the interest earned for different savings principals, interest rates, and time periods.

For more such questions on interest

https://brainly.com/question/25720319

#SPJ8

The mass of 8.7L of tetrafluoromethane (CF4) at STP is approximately 23.35 grams.

Tetrafluoromethane, also known as CF4, is a compound composed of one carbon atom and four fluorine atoms. To calculate the mass of 8.7L of CF4 at STP (Standard Temperature and Pressure), we need to use the ideal gas law.

First, we need to convert the volume of CF4 from liters to moles using the ideal gas law equation: PV = nRT. At STP, the pressure (P) is 1 atmosphere (atm) and the temperature (T) is 273.15 Kelvin (K). The gas constant (R) is 0.0821 L.atm/mol.K.

Using the equation V = nRT, we can solve for n (moles): n = PV / RT. Plugging in the values, we get n = (1 atm)(8.7L) / (0.0821 L.atm/mol.K)(273.15 K) ≈ 0.354 moles.

Next, we need to calculate the molar mass of CF4. The molar mass of carbon (C) is 12.01 g/mol, and the molar mass of fluorine (F) is 19.00 g/mol. Since CF4 has four fluorine atoms, we multiply the molar mass of fluorine by 4: 4(19.00 g/mol) = 76.00 g/mol.

Finally, we can calculate the mass of 0.354 moles of CF4 by multiplying the moles by the molar mass: (0.354 mol)(76.00 g/mol) ≈ 26.89 grams. Rounding to two decimal places, the mass of 8.7L of CF4 at STP is approximately 23.35 grams.

Know more about tetrafluoromethane here:

https://brainly.com/question/1468888

#SPJ11

Lake is closer to a PFR than a CMFR. In a lake, the water flows in one direction due to a gradient in temperature or salinity, which creates a layered effect.

The system that would be closer to a PFR (plug flow reactor) than a CMFR (continuous mixed flow reactor) is lake. In a plug flow reactor (PFR), the fluid flow is highly organized, moving through the reactor as a plug of fluid. There is a minimal mixing or back-mixing of the fluid within the reactor, and there is a steady-state flow from the entrance to the exit.

In contrast, a continuous mixed flow reactor (CMFR) has a continuous flow of reactants in and products out with the reactor contents are thoroughly mixed. The CMFR has uniform concentration of the reactants and products throughout the reactor and there is no concentration gradient.  

It is much like a stirred tank with a continuous flow in and out.

In conclusion, lake is closer to a PFR than a CMFR. In a lake, the water flows in one direction due to a gradient in temperature or salinity, which creates a layered effect.

The water at the bottom of the lake is denser and colder than the water at the top, causing it to sink and creating a stratified environment. The stratification prevents the water from mixing and creating a homogenous mixture, making the lake a closer system to a PFR than a CMFR.

To know more about temperature, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/7510619

#SPJ11

The energy of a photon with a wavelength of 5.84 mm is  9.997 x 10^-23 J.

The energy of a photon can be calculated using the equation E = hc/λ, where E is the energy of the photon, h is Planck's constant, c is the speed of light, and λ is the wavelength of the photon.

In this case, the given wavelength is 5.84 mm. To use the equation, we need to convert the wavelength to meters.

1 mm = 0.001 m

So, the wavelength in meters is 5.84 mm x 0.001 m/mm = 0.00584 m.

Now we can calculate the energy of the photon using the equation E = hc/λ.

h = 6.626 x 10^-34 J·s (Planck's constant)
c = 3 x 10^8 m/s (speed of light)
λ = 0.00584 m (wavelength)

Plugging these values into the equation, we get:

E = (6.626 x 10^-34 J·s) * (3 x 10^8 m/s) / (0.00584 m)
 = (6.626 x 3 x 10^-34 x 10^8) J / 0.00584
 = (19.878 x 10^-26) J / 0.00584
 = 3405.4 x 10^-26 J / 0.00584
 = 583708.9 x 10^-26 J / 0.00584
 = 9.997 x 10^-23 J

Therefore, the energy of a photon with a wavelength of 5.84 mm is approximately 9.997 x 10^-23 J.

To learn more about energy of a photon visit : https://brainly.com/question/15946945

#SPJ11