Answer:
David Robinson is a great example of personal responsibility. From early on in life, David Robinson understood the importance of taking responsibility for his own actions. Once, he overslept and paid for a taxi (with his own money) to get to school. Later, he deferred his start in the NBA two years so that he could serve time in the Navy.
bridgetchalich avatar
During his time in the NBA, David Robinson was so active in the community that the NBA’s community service award is named after him. David Robinson is not only a responsible person, but a moral person. When he saw a need in his community for high-quality inner-city education, he created the Carver Academy. Though not personally responsible for the well-being of the children, David Robinson took it upon himself to take the next step and support the children in his community
Explanation:
David Robinson, as a model of personal responsibility, grasped the value of accepting responsibility for his own actions in four sentences. Based on moral and public considerations.
What is personal responsibility?Personal responsibility refers to a person's capacity to master their own obligations to oneself and work with the tools they have to achieve their own professional and personal goals. The personal responsibility was the personal care of the system.
Robinson is an excellent illustration of how personal responsibility works, since he planned to elute yourself to complete his degree, serve his nation, and be a good successful player. Furthermore, he has used his talent to motivate others, carry out social projects, and assist others in developing this ability.
As a result, the David Robinson, as a model of personal responsibility, grasped the value of accepting responsibility.
Learn more about on personal responsibility, here:
https://brainly.com/question/15829139
#SPJ2
Provide an example of a situation in which the return of a fugitive from justice might be contested.
(Us government )
Answer:
When the fugitive is accused of military crime
When the fugitive is accused of political crime.
Explanation:
The federal government allows states to refuse to extradite an individual at large to the state that that individual has fled. This contestation of the fugitive's return to his state is allowed in some cases, because the constitution does not allow the federal government to oblige state governors to act in a certain way in cases of fugitive extradition, therefore, any state can contest this return . This challenge usually occurs in cases of fugitives for political crimes and military crimes.
An example of a situation in which the return of the fugitive can be contested is when they completed a crime in both states.
A fugitive simply means an individual who has escaped from captivity. The legal process where a fugitive from justice in a particular state is returned to the state is known as extradition.
It should be noted that an individual that is charged in any state with felony, treason, or other crime, who shall free from justice and is found in another state shall be delivered up and taken to the state that has jurisdiction of the crime.
In conclusion, in a situation where a fugitive completed a crime in both states, their return will be contested.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/23029524
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST>>> HURRY PLZ
What were some of the positions in society that free people of color occupied? Check all that apply.
businessperson
shop owner
slaveholder and planter
artisan and craftsperson
government official
Describe who the flappers were and what they represented.
Answer:
Flappers did what society did not expect from young women. They danced to Jazz Age music, they smoked, they wore makeup, they spoke their own language, and they lived for the moment. Flapper fashion followed the lifestyle. Skirts became shorter to make dancing easier. Flappers rebelled agianst the normal expectation that had been set out for women. Flappers represented the freedoom that women could have and the constant party that raged during the 1920's.
Answer:
Women who challenged social views.
The book is The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde
Even though the book has Jekyll and Hyde as title characters, the reader learns a lot about Utterson. Re-examine what you know about Utterson, going back to the opening paragraphs of the novel in which he is described in detail. Why do you think the author places such emphasis on this character? In what ways is Utterson a character full of contradictions?
What have we learned about the Victorian Era from reading this novel? What questions might you answer about the era to help you get more out of your reading?
Answer:
much of action in the book is seen thru uttersons eyes so it is believable. he makes him a lawyer who is cold and serious and dry but mentions he is lovable. "when the wine was to his taste something eminently human beaconed from his eye"..meaning he likes a drink but he is strict with himself and doesn't even visit the theatre. he is tolerant of others but strict with himaelf. he is unique and he represents the victorian gentleman of the time. he is the opposite of jekkyl. he is tolerant of what goes on in the book and he needs to be serious so the story is believable if seen thru his eyes and tolerant enough to listen to the crazy stories of jekyll and still be able to hang around after hearing those experiences. he is trustworthy but doesn't distract from the other characters. he is not judgemental.
victorian era was an era with the advancement of science, economic growth and the awakening of socially repressed feelings/behavior. this book tapped directly into the anxieties of the times
What rights were African American willing to fight for
Answer:
Basic human rights, the right to vote and equal rights.
Explanation:
Because we needed them.
URGENT!!! Need help need to be done by today!
Answer:
Stamp act- march 1765
Stamp act congress- October 1765
Declaratory act- 1766
Townshend act- 1767
Based on these maps, what state listed below was located in the Northeast Native American cultural region?
A. Texas
B. Colorado
C.New York
D. California
Answer:
C-New York
Explanation:
It’s northeast, and the others are not.
Answer:
C New York
Explanation:
took the test
Why do we have a two-party
system in the US
Answer:
The main reason for America's majoritarian character is the electoral system for Congress. ... Consider a system in which voters can vote for any candidate from any one of many parties. Suppose further that if a party gets 15% of votes, then that party will win 15% of the seats in the legislature.
Answer:
don´t forget to brainllest:)
Explanation:
There are several reasons why, in some systems, two major parties dominate the political landscape. There has been speculation that a two-party system arose in the United States from early political battling between the federalists and anti-federalists in the first few decades after the ratification of the Constitution, according to several views.In addition, there has been more speculation that the winner-takes-all electoral system as well as particular state and federal laws regarding voting procedures helped to cause a two-party system
In a two-party system, voters have mostly two options; in this sample ballot for an election in Summit, New Jersey, voters can choose between a Republican or Democrat, but there are no third party candidates.
Political scientists such as Maurice Duverger and William H. Riker claim that there are strong correlations between voting rules and type of party system. Jeffrey D. Sachs agreed that there was a link between voting arrangements and the effective number of parties. Sachs explained how the first-past-the-post voting arrangement tended to promote a two-party system:
The main reason for America's majoritarian character is the electoral system for Congress. Members of Congress are elected in single-member districts according to the "first-past-the-post" (FPTP) principle, meaning that the candidate with the plurality of votes is the winner of the congressional seat. The losing party or parties win no representation at all. The first-past-the-post election tends to produce a small number of major parties, perhaps just two, a principle known in political science as Duverger's Law. Smaller parties are trampled in first-past-the-post elections.
Question 1 of 15
Why did Iraq invade Kuwait in 1991?
O A. Iraq wanted to install Islamic fundamentalists in Kuwait.
B. Iraq wanted revenge for the revolution in Iran.
C. Iraq wanted to lower oil prices in the Persian Gulf.
D. Iraq wanted to control Kuwait's oil.
answer: iraq wanted to control kuwait’s oil
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
gshsusidiixjzisis
Iraq wanted to control Kuwait's oil is the reason of Iraq invade Kuwait in 1991. Hence, option D is correct.
Why did Iraq want Kuwait's oil?Iraq wants Kuwait's oil because they want more control over the lucrative oil to supply it to Middle East, as they have invaded the nation of Kuwait.
The reason o for invasion is the Iraq to Kuwait is as they are providing fund to the country for their military equipment and expansion.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more details about Iraq want Kuwait's oil, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/3421991
#SPJ2
The Law of April 6, 1830 did all of the following EXCEPT (mark the one answer that is NOT part of the law) * 25 points
A Banned slavery in Texas
B No more U.S. immigration
C No more EUROPEAN immigration
D Placed a tax on goods from the U.S.
Answer:
c
Explanation: took it
Answer:
it has to be D or a
Explanation:
sorry if wrong but not c
Compare the Committees of
Correspondence to something in our
society today.
Answer:
social meadia
Explanation:
you share correspondence online
HURRYYY PLSSSSSS
Which of these explorers were British? Check all that apply.
Bering
Drake
Gray
Cook
Meares
Answer:
Cook and Gray
Explanation:
Answer:
cook , gray , and meares .
Explanation:
i took the quiz too lol
This is the question. Please guys i need this asap!
Answer:
what there is no question
Explanation:
Answer: I cant see the question but c
Explanation:
How much did white population outnumber Native American population by 1900?
2 to 1
3 to 1
5 to 1
6 to 1
Answer:
1
Explanation:
Answer:
6 to 1
Explanation:
were the Caddos nomadic? or what google doesnt wanna tell me
Answer:
i believe so, they were travelers
Explanation:
Question 12
Below are views for and against ratification of the Constitution.
1
2
“The Constitution will create a
We must have a stronger national
national government more
government to protect our
tyrannical than the British
interests against foreign powers
government ever was. Our
and domestic unrest. The
individual liberties will be under
separation of powers and
constant threat. We need better
federalism will sufficiently curb
safeguards than the assurances
of the Constitution's supporters”
“the ambitions of the new
national government.”
Which conclusion can be drawn from these views?
A. The proposed Constitution strengthened state governments.
B. The proposed Constitution lacked a bill of rights.
C. The proposed Constitution guaranteed free speech.
D. The proposed Constitution had no national executive.
Why did taxes cause leaders to be reluctant about prohibition?
Answer:
Prohibition increased corruption because people ignored the law. ... Why did taxes cause leaders to be reluctant about prohibition? Income taxes were not created yet and the government depended on the liquor tax for funding.
Explanation:
Why is India often referred to as a sub-continent?
Answer:
Subcontinent means a large relatively self contained landmass forming a subdivision of continent. India is a subcontinent because: it is a big landmass and has a distinct geographical unit from the rest of the continent.
Explanation:
Hope this helped!!!
Please Hurry. Will Mark Brainliest !!
what is the answer to #8 ?
Answer:
I would say C
Explanation:
back then, a lot of Americans hated the Chinese, and thought that the Chinese immigrants were stealing the American's jobs
break down and explain the role christianity played in spanish colonization and empire building
Answer:
In the early years of what later became the United States, Christian religious groups played an influential role in each of the British colonies, and most attempted to enforce strict religious observance through both colony governments and local town rules.
Most attempted to enforce strict religious observance. Laws mandated that everyone attend a house of worship and pay taxes that funded the salaries of ministers. Eight of the thirteen British colonies had official, or “established,” churches, and in those colonies dissenters who sought to practice or proselytize a different version of Christianity or a non-Christian faith were sometimes persecuted.
Although most colonists considered themselves Christians, this did not mean that they lived in a culture of religious unity. Instead, differing Christian groups often believed that their own practices and faiths provided unique values that needed protection against those who disagreed, driving a need for rule and regulation.
Explanation:
In Europe, Catholic and Protestant nations often persecuted or forbade each other's religions, and British colonists frequently maintained restrictions against Catholics. In Great Britain, the Protestant Anglican church had split into bitter divisions among traditional Anglicans and the reforming Puritans, contributing to an English civil war in the 1600s. In the British colonies, differences among Puritan and Anglican remained.
Between 1680 and 1760 Anglicanism and Congregationalism, an offshoot of the English Puritan movement, established themselves as the main organized denominations in the majority of the colonies. As the seventeenth and eighteenth century passed on, however, the Protestant wing of Christianity constantly gave birth to new movements, such as the Baptists, Methodists, Quakers, Unitarians and many more, sometimes referred to as “Dissenters.” In communities where one existing faith was dominant, new congregations were often seen as unfaithful troublemakers who were upsetting the social order.
Despite the effort to govern society on Christian (and more specifically Protestant) principles, the first decades of colonial era in most colonies were marked by irregular religious practices, minimal communication between remote settlers, and a population of “Murtherers, Theeves, Adulterers, [and] idle persons.” An ordinary Anglican American parish stretched between 60 and 100 miles, and was often very sparsely populated. In some areas, women accounted for no more than a quarter of the population, and given the relatively small number of conventional households and the chronic shortage of clergymen, religious life was haphazard and irregular for most. Even in Boston, which was more highly populated and dominated by the Congregational Church, one inhabitant complained in 1632 that the “fellows which keepe hogges all weeke preach on the Sabboth.”
Christianity was further complicated by the widespread practice of astrology, alchemy and forms of witchcraft. The fear of such practices can be gauged by the famous trials held in Salem, Massachusetts, in 1692 and 1693. Surprisingly, alchemy and other magical practices were not altogether divorced from Christianity in the minds of many “natural philosophers” (the precursors of scientists), who sometimes thought of them as experiments that could unlock the secrets of Scripture. As we might expect, established clergy discouraged these explorations.
In turn, as the colonies became more settled, the influence of the clergy and their churches grew. At the heart of most communities was the church; at the heart of the calendar was the Sabbath—a period of intense religious and “secular” activity that lasted all day long. After years of struggles to impose discipline and uniformity on Sundays, the selectmen of Boston at last were able to “parade the street and oblige everyone to go to Church . . . on pain of being put in Stokes or otherwise confined,” one observer wrote in 1768. By then, few communities openly tolerated travel, drinking, gambling, or blood sports on the Sabbath.
Explain your opinion about the teachings of Muslims about gender inequality and equality
The Hendersons are hosting a barbecue for five people and want to purchase enough chicken for everyone to have two pieces. Which option makes the most financial sense?
Which option makes the most financial sense? 10 individual chicken breasts at $3 each
5 two-packs of chicken breasts at $5 each
a 12-pack bag of chicken at $20
a 20-pack bag of chicken at $35
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
Given that the number of people needed to serve is five and the plan is for each of them to have two pieces of chicken.
Hence
For choice A:
Total cost = 10*3 = $30
Number of pieces = 10
For choice B:
Total cost = 5*5 = $25
Number of pieces = 10
For choice C:
Total cost = $20
Number of pieces = 12
For choice D:
Total cost = $35
Number of pieces = 20
Therefore, considering the above choices, the best choice to choose is option C.
This is because it has the lowest cost and the number of pieces satisfies them and yet remains.
Answer: C
Explanation:
State governments have the power to
regulate interstate trade.
establish local governments.
declare war.
negotiate treaties./
Answer:
State governments have the power to regulate interstate trade. establish local governments. declare war. negotiate treaties. establish local treaties
Question:
State governments have the power to
regulate interstate trade.
establish local governments.
declare war.
A. Regulate Interstate Trade.
B. Establish Local Governments.
C. Declare War.
D. Negotiate Treaties.
Answer:
Establish Local Governments or B
I hope yall are having a wonderful day! Also this is for edge 2020-2021!
Explain the meaning of the phrase “cradle of civilization” when referencing Mesopotamia.
Answer:
Mesopotamia, the area between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers (in modern day Iraq), is often referred to as the cradle of civilization because it is the first place where complex urban centers grew.
Explanation:
Identify the Act(s), in 1774, which was a series of measures that repealed
the colonial charter of Massachusetts, increased the powers of the royal
governor, abolished the Massachusetts's Legislature, and closed the Port
of Boston?
Answer: The Tea Act of 1773 caused the Tea Party and the tea party caused the port of Boston to close down and made Massachusetts under direct British rule.
Give examples if a presidential custom
This is for US Government
i think this may help you i hope it helped thanks
Why did the ancient Egyptians use embalming?
Answer: The methods of embalming, or treating the dead body, that the ancient Egyptians used is called mummification. Using special processes, the Egyptians removed all moisture from the body, leaving only a dried form that would not easily decay. ... Mummification was practiced throughout most of early Egyptian history.
Explanation: :) Have great day!
Answer:
to preserve a body after death
to prevent the spread of disease
to advance the study of medicine
to enhance a body’s physical appearance
Explanation:
true or false carthage defeated rome in the many of the “punic wars”.
Answer:
true
Explanation:
Carthage and Rome fought the 17-year-long Second Punic War between 218 and 201 BC which ended with a Roman victory. The peace treaty imposed on the Carthaginians stripped them of all of their overseas territories, and some of their African ones. An indemnity of 10,000 silver talents was to be paid over 50 years.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Carthage lost all three Punic Wars coming the closest during the second Punic War and being razed during the last.
Why did people boycott the importing of European goods?
Answer:
taxes
Explanation:
What is a negative effect of being able to experience the same things worldwide through modern technology?