Neither of the girls completed their work.(Affirmative)
Answer:
that would be a negative sentence because an affirmative sentence expresses the thruth of an assertion.
Explanation:
Answer:
Both girls finished their work.
Explanation:
Summarize the lesson one can learn from a dog
Answer: A dog is man's best friend, and it gives one a reason to wake up, and be happy.
your mom leaves in aboard write a letter telling her three reasons why you need to go to aboard
Answer:
ok
Explanation:
In paragraph 3 of Viewpoint 1, the word distinguished means —
accessible
familiar
renowned
rigorous
Answer:
i guess right answer is familiar
Read the passage and then explain how the explicit and implicit details help the reader make the following inference: Charity will blame Larry for missing her bobsled tryout. Use specific examples from the text and explain why you chose those examples.
Answer:
sorry i dont really now
Explanation:
who was named the first u.s. national youth poet laureate?
Would you prefer fun questions or helping question?
Answer:
Both
Explanation:
sometimes fun and sometimes helpful
Read the excerpt from "Borderbus."
It took me 47 days to get here it wasn't easy hermana
45 days from Honduras with the coyotes the ones that — well
you know what they did to las chicas
right there in front of us so what were we supposed
to do and the trains the trains how can I tell you hermana
hundreds
of us like chickens like gophers in cages and vegetables
rotting on trains of thousands you hear me of thousands and
they slid
from the rooftops and the deserts of Arizona and Texas thirst
and hunger
thirst and hunger two things thirst and hunger day after day
hermana
Which words from the excerpt best create a cruel tone?
A trains, rooftops
B cages, rotting
C hundreds, thousands
D deserts, days
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Words can be borrowed from "dead" languages. TrueFalse
Answer:
the answer is true and have a nice day
Explanation:
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Plenty of words from the romance language tree come from Latin, an old language no longer used
Evaluate the reasoning Douglass uses in the passage by determining whether the conclusion is valid or invalid.
Answer:
invalid
Explanation:
because the firest sentens say that the range of slave but the last sentence dos'nt modify the firest sentens so it is called uncogent (invalid )
Answer:
People are entitled to their own opinions. The reasoning that Douglass uses in the passage by determining whether the conclusion is valid or invalid is that;
The evidence in the passage leads to the conclusion that was drawn.
The particular observations follows the due procedure of logical reasoning of generalization.
The generalization is said to only follow logically sue to the specific observations and as such it is valid.
Why is conclusion valid?
From the above reasoning, we can see that the slaves are unhappy about their plight and Fredrick Douglas before arriving at the conclusion, he has evidence, he has observe and then he made conclusion from what he has gathered.
Douglass supported his conclusion with the fact that African Americans need not prove that they are people, but they instead they are often forced to prove it.
Explanation:
got this answer form somebody else
One possible theme of call of the wild could be that only the strongest survive. Explain how this relates to darwins theory of natural selection and the survival of the fittest. Do you agree or disagree with this idea? Is there one aspect in which you agree but another with which u do not?
please help i only have a few days- untill schools over
Putting together our knowledge of "The Call of the Wild" and Darwin's theories, we can answer in the following manner - the second answer is an example of a personal opinion:
In Jack London's "The Call of the Wild," the dog Buck is only able to survive the extremely difficult conditions he has to live in because of his strength and capacity to adapt and learn. That is precisely what Darwin's theories teach us. Only the animals and plants that are strong and can adapt to the environment survive.I believe Darwin's idea is reasonable, but it makes sense in a natural, wild world. For us humans, that is no longer true. Even if we are born sick or with special needs, for example, it does not mean we are not going to survive. Scientific and medical advancements, as well as society, allow us to live.What happens in "The Call of the Wild"?The dog Buck is stolen from his comfortable home in the United States and taken to Canada to be a sled-dog. His new life is the complete opposite of what Buck was used to.Still, Buck has a great capacity for adaptation. He learns what he should or should not do quickly. He is also a strong animal, which allows him to survive even the direst conditions.How is that connected to Darwin's theories?According to Charles Darwin, only the fittest survives. That means only those who are capable of adapting themselves to new, difficult conditions, and who are strong will survive in this world.Buck embodies Darwin's theories since he only survives because he is the fittest. Other dogs would not survive the terrible treatment and harsh natural environment Buck is subjugated to.Learn more about "The Call of the Wild" here:
https://brainly.com/question/16513746
This is an independent clause with no subordinate clauses.
Answer:
Ok, I will take your word for it. You didn't have a question, right?
Explanation:
PLEASE HELP
Rachel has enrolled in an online course in restaurant management. She can take the course at any time of day and in any sequence. What type of multimedia is this course?
Text multimedia
Fleximedia
nonlinear multimedia
hypermedia
linear multimedia.
Answer:
It's most likely to be E
Explanation:
Answer:
nonlinear multimedia
Explanation:
Logical flow in a paper is also known as ____.
•unity
•parallelism
•coherence
•emphasis
What does it mean to snap back?
Answer:
if you snap back you abruptly give someone an answer back
Explanation:
Answer:
The key is learning to take this “snap back” into your own hands and regularly return to reality – the true reality of what happening right now.
i’m stuck , help
pls
PLZZZ HELP ITS PAST DUE AND REALLY NEED HELP
Could erroneously blaming the monkey's paw for their misfortunes be an allegory
about how people misjudge foreigners or things from different cultures? Explain.
Answer:
The story revolves around a mysterious cursed talisman—a monkey’s paw that symbolizes greed—everything that its owner could possibly wish for and the unrestricted ability to make it happen. This power makes the paw alluring, even to unselfish people who desire nothing and have everything they need. Mr. White, for example, is eager to procure the paw, even though he admits he is in need of nothing and is unsure of what to wish for. Herbert jokingly suggests that his father wish for money, which he does not need, just for the sake of it. This thought process illustrates how easily the paw can sway minds. The paw represents greed and brings out the selfish desire dormant in even the most content people. The wish is granted, but with unexpected, sinister consequences.Keeping in mind the motif of three, one of the most common representations of a group of three in Western culture is the Holy Trinity from Christianity. It refers to Father, Son and the Holy Spirit. The monkey's paw hails from a faraway land where it was cursed by an Indian holy man – making it an anti-Christian symbol. Hence it disregards Christianity and the Holy Trinity, bringing unfortunate consequences to the family that indulges in it.Hope this helps !!Monkey's Paw: The talisman represents desire and greed, as well as the evil that results from tempting fate. Threes: three separate owners, the White family is three people, three knocks, represent the "magic number" of superstitious or supernatural events.
What does the monkey paw symbolize?The monkey's paw represents desire and greed—everything its owner could ever want and the unrestricted ability to make it happen. This power makes the paw appealing even to selfless people who want nothing and have everything they require.Foreshadowing is one of the most common ways to express suspense in a story. Sergeant Major Morris, for example, claims that the first owner of the paw wished to die. Suspense is created because the reader wants to know why he wished for death. It suggests that the paw will bring bad luck."The Monkey's Paw" is also a contemporary parable, replete with moral lessons and advice on how to live a more fulfilling life.Monkey's Paw: The talisman represents desire and greed, as well as the evil that results from tempting fate. Threes: three separate owners, the White family is three people, three knocks, represent the "magic number" of superstitious or supernatural events.
To learn more about : The Monkey's Paw
Ref : https://brainly.com/question/18959421
#SPJ2
? yjsndidnbdbsjsnsnekwknwsjddk
Why does the judge bring Elizabeth proctor into the court room? What does she say?
In court she denies Proctor's adultery. She tells this lie to protect her husband's good name but does not realise that he has already made a public confession.
20 POINTS!! please help find the page numbers of these quotes I need them for my essay
(Anne Frank's Diary)
Quote One:
''The period of tearfully passing judgment on Mother is over. I've grown wiser and Mother's nerves are a bit steadier. Most of the time I manage to hold my tongue when I'm annoyed, and she does too; so on the surface, we seem to be getting along better.''
Quote Two:
''At moments like these I can't stand Mother. It's obvious that I'm a stranger to her; she doesn't even know what I think about the most ordinary things.''
Part A: I believe the correct answer is A. There are problems in Anne's relationship with her mother.
Which line shows the problem between Anne’s relationship with her mother?From these lines of dialogue in “The Diary of Anne Frank”, Act 1, it can be concluded that there are problems in Anne’s relationship with her mother. Anne does not hate her mother, but she would rather be spared of her company.
Part B: I believe the correct answer is: C. We have nothing in common. She doesn't understand me. Whenever I try to explain my…
The excerpt from the play “The Diary of Anne Frank” which provides additional support for the correct answer to the previous question is that Anne and her mother don’t have anything in common and that her mother does not understand her, which is why she would rather not be in her company.
Therefore, Part A: I believe the correct answer is A. There are problems in Anne's relationship with her mother.
Learn more about The Diary of Anne Frank on:
https://brainly.com/question/30817506
#SPJ2
Choose the line of dialogue that would best express the soldiers’ actions in the bottom pane of page 3.
From the excerpt, it can be deduced that the line of dialogue that would best express the soldiers’ actions is A. "Can Beowulf really protect us from Grendel"?
It should be noted that the soldiers recalled the unsavory experiences that some of their colleagues had at the hands of Grendel. The monster terrorized them.
Therefore, when Beowulf agreed to engage Grendel in a fight, they were glad but they weren't sure if Beowulf really protect them from Grendel.
Learn more about Beowulf on:
https://brainly.com/question/25084573
PLS HELP!!!!! ENGLISH
Copy and paste the three questions into the textbook below, and do your best to answer each one honestly and thoroughly.
List a few facts that you know about Roman history, Julius Caesar, or William Shakespeare.
What do you remember about reading plays in other English courses? How are they structured compared to short stories or novels?
List at least one prediction or question you have before reading Julius Caesar.
Answer:
We cannot do this we haven't read the stories
Explanation:
We cannot do this we haven't read the stories
Which examples of propaganda are found in this passage? Select two options.
Snowball is used as a scapegoat.
Napoleon talks to the animals through Squealer.
Squealer targets his message to emphasize plain folks.
Squealer uses glittering generalities to describe Napoleon’s tactics.
Napoleon uses name-calling to differentiate the pigs from the other animals.
Answer:
Answers are in bold.
Snowball is used as a scapegoat.
Napoleon talks to the animals through Squealer.
Squealer targets his message to emphasize plain folks.
Squealer uses glittering generalities to describe Napoleon’s tactics.
Napoleon uses name-calling to differentiate the pigs from the other animals.
The examples of propaganda which are found in this passage are:
Squealer targets his message to emphasize plain folks.Squealer uses glittering generalities to describe Napoleon’s tacticsPropagandaThis refers to the use of words that are meant to cause misdirection usually through the use of information that is misleading.
With this in mind, we can see that from the complete text, there is the use of plain folks and glittering generalities in order to deceive the other animals in the farm.
Read more about propaganda here:
https://brainly.com/question/24939953
What is the boiling point of water at 2400 feet?
Please help 20 points
Answer:
Explanation:
1000 ft (305 m.) 210 ºF 99 ºC
1500 ft. (457 m.) 209 ºF 98.5 ºC
2000 ft. (610 m.) 208 ºF 98 ºC
2500 ft. (762 m.) 207 ºF 97.5 ºC
hope that help you mark me brinilylist
Complete the compound adjectives with the words. blooded eyed haired left open well 1 He's a good boy. He's -behaved. 2 She's tall and blue- like her dad. 3 I'm -handed. I always write with that hand. 4 There's a beautiful long- rabbit in the zoo. 5 Is he ...-minded? Does he like new ideas? 6 That creature is a reptile. It's cold..........
Taylor left to walk the dog at 4:25 she got back at 5 o’clock how long was the dogs walk
Answer:
35 Minutes
Explanation:
hope this helped.
What does “ if I take care of my character, my reputation will take care of itself.” Mean
Answer:
it means like character is the mental and moral qualities distinctive to an individual.so if u talk to others nicely they will to u ...
Explanation:
world works like that nowadays
1. Remember, you're in a library, you __ speak loudly
Answer: B (mustn't)
2. Don't forget to take an umbrella. It __ rain later.
Answer: A (might)
3. Betty ___ be ill. I've just seen her.
Answer: B (can't)
4. I was using my mobile phone a minute ago. It __ be somewhere here.
Answer: A (must)
5. A man may be ___ friendly, yet malicious heart.
Answer: A (apparently)
6. The investment is a ___ thing
Answer: A (certain)
7. The bailiff had a grip on the prisoner's arm
Answer: A (sure)
8. This part of an argumentative text outlines the topic, provides background information necessary to understand your argument and presents the thesis statement
Answer: A (introduction)
9. This part of an argumentative text usually comprises three or more paragraphs that explain the reason why you support your thesis. This is where the writer backs up his claims with examples, research, statistics, studies, and text citations
Answer: B (body)
10. This part of an argumentative text restates the writer's thesis and summarizes all of the arguments made in body paragraphs
Answer: C (conclusion)
Correct nyo nalang po pag may mali akong nasagot.
Answer:
it was correct
(you're good)
#KEEP_IT_UP
Explanation:
:)
Make sentence from:- One turn of pitch-and-toss
Answer:
risk it on one turn of pitch and toss
The other girl, Daisy, made an attempt to rise-she leaned slightly forward with a conscientious expression-then she laughed, an absurd, charming little laugh, and I laughed too and came forward into the room. "I'm p-paralyzed with happiness. ill Which literary device does this passage best exemplify? A. Paradox B. Sarcasm C. Understatement D. Repetition
Answer:
b
Explanation:
The literary device that the passage best exemplifies is a paradox. The correct option is a.
What is a paradox?A paradox is a logically self-contradictory statement or a statement that runs contrary to one's expectation. It is a statement that, despite apparently valid reasoning from true premises, leads to a seemingly self-contradictory or logically unacceptable conclusion.
A paradox usually involves contradictory-yet-interrelated elements that exist simultaneously and persist over time. They result in "persistent contradiction between interdependent elements" leading to a lasting "unity of opposites". In logic, many paradoxes exist that are known to be invalid arguments, yet are nevertheless valuable in promoting critical thinking, while other paradoxes have revealed errors in definitions that were assumed to be rigorous, and have caused axioms of mathematics and logic to be re-examined.
In common usage, the word paradox often refers to statements that are ironic or unexpected, such as the paradox that standing is more tiring than walking.
Learn more about paradox, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29959030
#SPJ2