The period known as the "Crazy Part" of the French Revolution is usually referring to the Reign of Terror, which lasted from 1793 to 1794.
What is French Revolution?The French Revolution was a period of social and political upheaval in France and its colonies that lasted from 1789 to 1799. It began with the convocation of the Estates-General, when representatives of the three traditional classes of French society—the clergy, nobility, and commoners—met to discuss taxation and other grievances. These discussions quickly turned into a full-blown revolution as the lower classes rose up to overthrow the monarchy and aristocracy. The revolution was marked by mass violence, including the radical Reign of Terror, and the execution of King Louis XVI and other members of the royal family. It also saw the creation of a new constitutional government, the National Assembly, and the adoption of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, which enshrined the principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity. The revolution ultimately led to the establishment of a constitutional monarchy and the Napoleonic Empire.
To learn more about French Revolution
https://brainly.com/question/28910373
#SPJ9
Philosophy question: How do you know that you’re not dreaming?
Answer: By remembering how you got there.
Explanation: By running through your mind how you got here, for example how you woke up, what you ate, and what mode of transport got you to that location, you know you aren't dreaming, you can never remember the beginning of a dream, only the middle, and end. You will usually not reflect on yourself in a dream, only live in the action of the dream. Also, look at a mirror, the reflection won't be real.
From my own personal experience, dreams rarely have objects that tell the time in them, that's not to say that they don't completely, just most of the time.
This is just a theory.
11 IV Use your textbook to explain the concept of the 'Master Identify and interview 3 relevant & knowledgeable people: on white supremacy in South Africa Find out on the application of Racism in Germany (Textbook) To investigate how Apartheld shaped social life in South Africa To shed light on beneficiaries of Racism in both Germany and South Africa. Find out on the victims of Racism in both Germany and South Africa. DE USED FOR PURPOSES OF MARK
The beneficiaries of racism in Germany and South Africa were predominantly the white population but the victims were often the non-white population.
Beneficiaries and victims of racism in Germany and South Africa?In Germany, Aryan race was considered superior while other races like Jews were persecuted. This led to the Holocaust in which Jews were murdered. Even after WWII, racism still exist in Germany with the discrimination and exclusion of migrant workers particularly those from Turkey.
In South Africa, during apartheid regime, white population benefited from racism while the black population suffered. The regime enforced discrimination against black South Africans which denied them basic human rights such as access to education, healthcare, political representation etc.
Read more about Racism
brainly.com/question/2864094
#SPJ1
Why does Robert Jackson believe that even though military authorities have the power to violate constitutional protections in the time of war, the courts should not approve their actions?
Answer:
Jackson believed that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and that the courts have a duty to interpret and enforce its provisions, even in times of war. He argued that the courts should not defer to the military authorities' judgment when they are accused of violating constitutional protections.
In Jackson's view, allowing military authorities to violate constitutional protections to promote national security would undermine the Constitution's fundamental principles and ideals. It would also create a dangerous precedent that could be used to justify other violations of constitutional protections in the future.
Jackson acknowledged that wartime poses unique challenges to the government. He noted that some limitations on civil liberties may help ensure national security. However, he believed that these limitations should be narrowly tailored to address specific security concerns. Furthermore, they should be subject to judicial review to ensure that they do not violate constitutional protections.
[Get instant help with essays, answers, and research papers from proffrank(at)g m ail.c om. Sorry for this, but kindly remove this part before submitting the assignment. Let's talk:)]
Overall, Jackson believed that the courts' role in protecting individual liberties and enforcing the Constitution was essential, even during times of war.
Explanation: