Which of these statements best compares the economic development of the North and South during the first half of the 19th century?

A. More factories and railroad lines were built in the North than in the South.
B. The North developed more trade connections with Europe than the South did.
C. Land values in the North increased more quickly than land values in the South.
D. Exporting agricultural goods became more important to the North than to the South.

Answer:

Europeans practiced Christianity, while Japanese people practiced Buddhism and Shintoism.

Explanation:

Medieval Europe practised Christianity as they were monotheistic, unlike Medieval Japan that practised more than one religion and were polytheistic, as they practised Buddhism and Shintoism.

Therefore, the two continents were different in their religious beliefs and systems.

Answer:

a

Explanation:

:) edge 2021

Answer: Men would hunted for food. Women butchered the game and prepare the buffalo hides that men brought back to camp. Children were taught skills they would need as adults.

Explanation:

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Three ways in that Humanism and secularism challenged core structures in the medieval world were:

1.- Human beings can use reason as a way to make decisions based on their intellect.

2.- Religion should be out of political and economic decisions that affect a society.

3.- People started to challenge explanations that the Catholic church believe were valid about the natural world.

That was the importance of the Renaissance, that people could free themselves of the rigorous teachings of the Catholic church that imposed its beliefs during the dark ages of Medieval times.

That is why important artists questioned those antique ideas about god and creation and expressed a new form of thinking through art. That was the case of Michelangelo Buonarroti, Leonardo Da Vinic, and Rafael.

The ways through which Humanism and Secularism directly challenged the core structures in the medieval world are:

According to the given question, we are asked to state the ways through which Humanism and Secularism directly challenged the core structures in the medieval world.

As a result of this, we can see that there were several ways humanism and secularism made a distinction and challenged the core structure of the Catholic Church and religion in general which was mainly achieved by encouraging reasoning and logic.

Read more here:

https://brainly.com/question/13958901

Answer:

C is correct.

Explanation:

Answer:

D

Explanation:

After the civil war, everyone had to reimagine what life would be like without slavery, so reconstruction.

Answer:

d

Explanation:

Answer: The Enabling Act of 1933, formally titled Gesetz zur Behebung der Not von Volk und Reich, was a law that gave the German Cabinet—in effect, the Chancellor—the power to enact laws without the involvement of the Reichstag, and to override fundamental aspects of the Weimar Constitution. The Enabling Act gave Hitler plenary powers and followed on the heels of the Reichstag Fire Decree, which had abolished most civil liberties and transferred state powers to the Reich government. The combined effect of the two laws was to transform Hitler's government into a legal dictatorship.

Explanation:

Answer:

I think its C but I don't know for sure

Explanation:

Library derives from the Latin word liber meaning "book"

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Answer:

d

Explanation:

they were always seen as property

Answer:

the spanish empire

Explanation:

Answer:

b

Explanation:

Answer: B. either criminal law or right behavior.

Explanation: i got it right

Answer:

i think its c

Explanation:

tell me if im wrong

Answer:

The act required that slaves be returned to their owners, even if they were in a free state. The act also made the federal government responsible for finding, returning, and trying escaped slaves.

Explanation:

Answer:

It was taxation without representation.

Explanation:

Taxation without representation is when a group of people are being tax without having any say about it. The 13 colonies had nobody representing them in England (where all they taxes were being created). This made them retaliate and break away from England.

Answer:

Tories

The Tories were a political faction and then a political party in the parliaments of England, Scotland, Great Britain, Ireland and the United Kingdom. Between the 1670s and 1830s, the Tories contested power with their rivals, the Whigs.

Explanation:

brainiest please

Answer:

The First Battle of Bull Run, also known as the Battle of Manassas, marked the first major land battle of the American Civil War. On July 21, 1861, Union and Confederate armies clashed near Manassas Junction, Virginia. The engagement began when about 35,000 Union troops marched from the federal capital in Washington, D.C. to strike a Confederate force of 20,000 along a small river known as Bull Run. After fighting on the defensive for most of the day, the rebels rallied and were able to break the Union right flank, sending the Federals into a chaotic retreat towards Washington. The Confederate victory gave the South a surge of confidence and shocked many in the North, who realized the war would not be won as easily as they had hoped.

Explanation:

Answer:

It was mainly wars that inspired patriotic songs

Answer:

"Owing to their adaptability, their skill in communications, and their reputation for ferocity, the Mongols swept across Eurasia over the 13th and 14th centuries, quickly assembling the largest contiguous empire in world history."

Explanation:

Please use this in your own words

Answer:

thats worth more than 5points

thats worth more than 5points

thats worth more than 5points

Explanation:

thats worth more than 5points

thats worth more than 5points

thats worth more than 5points

thats worth more than 5points

thats worth more than 5points

thats worth more than 5points

thats worth more than 5points

thats worth more than 5points

thats worth more than 5points

Answer:

For: more money,power and to gain possession and control of military eauipment.

Against: too much power, or money, eveything could go wrong and lead to a war.

Explanation:

Answer:they enjoyed special protection under the U.S. constitution.

Explanation:>?>?

Answer:

Saudi Arabia.

Absolute monarchy system

Explanation:

Saudi Arabia is one of the Southwest Asia country in the world which has an absolute monarchy form of government. The monarch holds the highest position in government including the legislative, executive, and judicial office. The King is the head state and government.

Saudi Arabia ruled by a descendant of the prior leader of the country. The Al Saud, a family whose rank was established by its close ties with the support of religious institution by adopting the royal decree in 1992.

Answer:

the condition of a tenant farmer bound to a hereditary plot of land and to the will of a landlord : the state or fact of being a serf Despite obvious personal repugnance for serfdom, she enhanced the powers of nobles to demand more labor from their ill-treated and unorganized serfs

Explanation:

welcome

Answer:PLEASE MARK ME THE BRANIEST

Explanation:

: the condition of a tenant farmer bound to a hereditary plot of land and to the will of a landlord : the state or fact of being a serf Despite obvious personal repugnance for serfdom, she enhanced the powers of nobles to demand more labor from their ill-treated and unorganized serfs.—

Answer:

This year initiates the commemoration of the Sesquicentennial of the Civil War.  This is an occasion for serious reflection on a war that killed some 600,000 of our citizens and left many hundreds of thousands emotionally and physically scarred.  Translated into today’s terms – our country is ten times more populous than it was then -- the dead would number some 6 million, with tens of millions more wounded, maimed, and psychologically damaged.  The price was indeed catastrophic.

As a Southerner with ancestors who fought for the Confederacy, I have been intrigued with the question of why my ancestors felt compelled to leave the United States and set up their own country.  What brought the American experiment to that extreme juncture?

The short answer, of course, is Abraham Lincoln’s election as president of the United States.  What concerned Southerners most about Lincoln’s election was his opposition to the expansion of slavery into the territories; Southern politicians were clear about that.  If new states could not be slave states, went the argument, then it was only a matter of time before the South’s clout in Congress would fade, abolitionists would be ascendant, and the South’s “peculiar institution” – the right to own human beings as property – would be in peril.

It is easy to understand why slave owners would be concerned about the threat, real or imagined, that Lincoln posed to slavery.  But what about those Southerners who did not own slaves?  Why would they risk their livelihoods by leaving the United States and pledging allegiance to a new nation grounded in the proposition that all men are not created equal, a nation established to preserve a type of property that they did not own?

In order to find an answer to this question, please travel back with me to the South of 1860.  Let’s put ourselves into the skin of Southerners who lived there then.  That’s what being an historian is about: putting yourself into the minds of people who lived in another time to understand things from their perspective, from their point of view.  Let’s set aside what people said and wrote later, after the dust had settled. Let’s wipe the historic slate clean and visit the South of 150 years ago through the documents that survive from that time.  What were Southerners saying to other Southerners about why they had to secede?

There is, of course, a historical backdrop that formed the foundation of experience for Southerners in 1860.  More than 4 million enslaved human beings lived in the south, and they touched every aspect of the region’s social, political, and economic life.  Slaves did not just work on plantations.  In cities such as Charleston, they cleaned the streets, toiled as bricklayers, carpenters, blacksmiths, bakers, and laborers.  They worked as dockhands and stevedores, grew and sold produce, purchased goods and carted them back to their masters’ homes where they cooked the meals, cleaned, raised the children, and tended to the daily chores.  “Charleston looks more like a Negro country than a country settled by white people,” a visitor remarked.

Fear of a slave rebellion was palpable.  The establishment of a black republic in Haiti and the insurrections, threatened and real, of Gabriel Prosser, Denmark Vesey, and Nat Turner stoked the fires.  John Brown’s raid at Harper’s Ferry sent shock waves through the south.  Throughout the decades leading up to 1860, slavery was a burning national issue, and political battles raged over the admission of new states as slave or free.  Compromises were struck – the Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850 – but the controversy could not be laid to rest.

The South felt increasingly beleaguered as the North increased its criticism of slavery.  Abolitionist societies sprang up, Northern publications demanded the immediate end of slavery, politicians waxed shrill about the immorality of human bondage, and overseas, the British parliament terminated slavery in the British West Indies.  A prominent historian accurately noted that “by the late 1850’s most white Southerners viewed themselves as prisoners in their own country, condemned by what they saw as a hysterical abolition movement.”

As Southerners became increasingly isolated, they reacted by becoming more strident in defending slavery.  The institution was not just a necessary evil: it was a positive good, a practical and moral necessity.  Controlling the slave population was a matter of concern for all Whites, whether they owned slaves or not.  Curfews governed the movement of slaves at night, and vigilante committees patrolled the roads, dispensing summary justice to wayward slaves and whites suspected of harboring abolitionist views.  Laws were passed against the dissemination of abolitionist literature, and the South increasingly resembled a police state.  A prominent Charleston lawyer described the city’s citizens as living under a “reign of terror.”

Explanation:

Answer:

When Europeans first colonized the North American continent, the land was vast, the work was harsh, and there was a severe shortage of labor. White bond servants, paying their passage across the ocean from Europe through indentured labor, eased but did not solve the problem. Tensions between settlers and former indentured servants increased the pressure to find a new labor source.  Early in the seventeenth century, a Dutch ship loaded with African slaves introduced a solution—and yet paradoxically a new problem—to the New World. Slaves proved to be economical on large farms where labor-intensive cash crops, such as tobacco, sugar and rice, could be grown.

By the end of the American Revolution, slavery became largely unprofitable in the North and was slowly dying out. Even in the South the institution was becoming less useful to farmers as tobacco prices fluctuated and began to drop. Due to the decline of the tobacco market in the 1760s and 1770s many farmers switched from producing tobacco to wheat, which required less labor leading to surplus of slaves. However, in 1793 northerner Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin; this device made it possible for textile mills to use the type of cotton most easily grown in the lower South. The invention of the cotton gin brought about a robust internal slave trade. As the lower South became more established in cotton production the region required more slave labor, which they received from upper South slaveowners looking to offload their surplus of slaves. In 1808, the United States banned the international slave trade (the importation of slaves),  which only increased the demand for domestically traded slaves. In the upper South the most profitable cash crop was not was not an agricultural product but the sale of human lives.  Although some southerners owned no slaves at all, by 1860 the South’s “peculiar institution” was inextricably tied to the region’s economy and society.

Anti-slavery proponents organized the Underground Railroad to help slaves escape north to freedom. Although fictionalized, Harriet Beecher Stowe’s 1852 immensely popular novel Uncle Tom’s Cabin opened northerner’s eyes to some of the horrors of slavery and refuted the southern myth that blacks were happy as slaves. In reality, treatment of slaves ranged from mild and paternalistic to cruel and sadistic. Husbands, wives, and children were frequently sold away from one another and punishment by whipping was not unusual. In 1857 the United States Supreme Court in the decision Dred Scott v. Sandford ruled that all blacks, whether free or enslaved, lacked the rights to citizenship and thus could not sue in federal court. The Supreme Court took their decision a step further by deeming that Congress had in fact exceeded its authority in the earlier Missouri Compromise because it had no power to forbid or abolish slavery in the territories. The Supreme Court also ruled that popular sovereignty, where new territories could vote on entering the union as a free or slave state, lacked constitutional legitimacy. Thus, slaves had no legal means of protesting their treatment. Due to the Dred Scott decision, John Brown’s raid on Harper’s Ferry, and other earlier slave uprisings, Southerners feared servile insurrection above all else but this was rare. Instead as a form of resistance slaves would pretend illness, organize slowdowns, sabotage farm machinery, and sometimes commit arson or murder. Running away for short periods of time was common.The outbreak of the Civil War forever changed the future of the American nation and perhaps most notably the future of Americans held in bondage. The war began as a struggle to preserve the Union, not a struggle to free the slaves but as the war dragged on it became increasingly clear to President Abraham Lincoln the best way to force the seceded states into submission was to undermine their labor supply and economic engine which was sustaining the south—slavery. Many slaves escaped to the North in the early years of the war, and several Union generals established contraband policies in the southern land that they conquered.  Congress passed laws permitting the seizure of slaves from rebellious southerners as the rules of war allow for the seizure of property and the United States considered slaves property. On September 22, 1862, following the strategic Union victory at Antietam, President Abraham Lincoln presented the Preliminary Emancipation Proclamation.

Explanation:

hope this helped =)

Answer:

The Mongol Empire was ruled with absolute authority by the khans. ... By 1300 the empire had been divided into four khanates of Central Asia, Persia, China, and Russia, each of which was headed by a powerful khan. Obedience and loyalty were crucial elements of control for such a vast empire.

Explanation:

Other nations observe the success of American democracy and institute a similar one.

Answer:

2.to capture Canada

Explanation:

is the only one that makes sense

Answer:

Explanation:

the war made every thing in every part displaced and an organised like hospitals hotels food providing shops service providers etc