When fraud occurred the court would likely award punitive damages after a breach of contract.
Punitive damages, also known as exemplary damages or exemplary punishment, are financial penalties imposed on the defendant for egregious behavior and/or as a means of reforming or discouraging future such behavior by the defendant and others. Such behavior was the reason for the litigation. Punitive damages are regarded as punishment and are frequently given at the court's discretion when the defendant's actions are determined to be particularly detrimental. In the legal sense, fraud is the deliberate deception used to get an unfair or illegal advantage or to deny a victim of a legal right. Fraud can be against the law in both civil (a victim of scam may file a lawsuit against the perpetrator to stop the fraud or obtain monetary restitution) and criminal ( (e.g., a fraud perpetrator may be prosecuted and imprisoned by governmental authorities).
Learn more about punitive damages here :
https://brainly.com/question/14265086
#SPJ4
8: About 1 in 3 shoplifters actually gets caught.
True or false
n davis v. baugh industrial contractors, the traditional common law rule prevented a party who accepted a completed construction project from later suing the contractor for flaws in construction that caused injury to others. in reviewing such a case, the washington state high court held that the rule was not sensible in modern times and would be dropped. this is an example of how:
The Washington state high court held that the rule was not sensible in modern times and would be dropped. this is an example of how: (B) common law can adapt to changing circumstances
4 Alan's daughter Tami Davis, who is also his estate's personal representative, brought this negligence claim against Baugh and other defendants. The completion and acceptance doctrine absolved Baugh of culpability for negligence once the work was finished and accepted by the property owner, according to the summary judgment that the trial court awarded Baugh. Additionally, the trial court partially invalidated an expert declaration for Davis. Davis contends that the trial court erred in his direct appeal from the superior court. We both agree and switch. NORMS OF REVIEW
To know more about Davis v. Baugh Industrial Contractors, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/5000868
#SPJ4
Complete Questions:
In Davis v. Baugh Industrial Contractors, the traditional common law rule prevented a party who accepted a completed construction project from later suing the contractor for flaws in construction that caused injury to others. In reviewing such a case, the Washington state high court held that the rule was not sensible in modern times and would be dropped. This is an example of how:
(A) modern day values are changing
(B) common law can adapt to changing circumstances
(C) common law never changes
(D) courts can never go against a precedent set in previous cases
(E) none of the other choices
There are five major advantages to using multi agency task forces that include all of the following except
It is time-consuming. If a large sample of individuals were used for the task analysis, it would take a lot of time to complete.
The significance of a task force.Task forces are organizations that focus on a specific criminal activity, frequently in a specific geographic area. In order to effectively battle crime, it is important to combine the abilities, knowledge, and resources of several law enforcement authorities.
How are task forces structured?Task forces are teams composed of members who are often experts in a certain field of study or profession. Small groups of individuals—as well as resources—are assembled into task forces with the intention of achieving a single goal. It is anticipated that the task force would disband after the goal has been achieved.
To know more about task forces visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/1466358
#SPJ13
Which statement is TRUE, regarding parental consent for medication administration?
A. Best practice requires written parental consent before administering a prescription medication in the child care environment.
B. Best practice requires written parental consent before administering an OTC medication in the child care environment.
C. Best practice requires written parental consent before administering herbal or homeopathic remedies in the child care environment.
D. All of the above are true.
E. Only A and B are true
The statement "All of the above are true" regarding parental consent for medication administration.
Early childhood providers must acquire written parental approval for each and every drug supplied, although this is not necessary every time the medication is given. For example, you will need parental approval to begin a course of antibiotics, but not every time the antibiotic is administered over the duration of therapy.It is a good idea to have parents sign the written record to certify that you have informed them that the agreed-upon medication has been administered. This will help you to demonstrate that you informed parents about the medicine, as required by the Early Years Foundation Stage Statutory Framework.Early years providers must follow the same recording processes as those for prescription medication and notify parents when any drugs have been delivered, preferably on the same day but as soon as practically possible.Thus the correct option is D.
To learn more about medication, refer: https://brainly.com/question/26254731
#SPJ1
Sitting prosecutors give much attention to quality recommendations. Why? Name three reasons for this in approximately 150 words.
The reason why sitting prosecutors give much attention to quality recommendations is because:
Quality recommendations will help them in building their case. It can help them to show their level of confidence on what is been presented. It can helps them to be able to know if a given estimate of the given effect is efficient.What is quality recommendation?A good recommendation instructs the reader by drawing on the author's own knowledge. Don't assume recommenders will remember the projects you worked on together.
Note that the strength of the evidence determines how confident one can be in the accuracy of an estimate of effect. The degree to which following an advice will result in more positive outcomes than negative ones is determined by the recommendation's strength.
Learn more about quality from
https://brainly.com/question/26491505
#SPJ1
A city government wants to track down people who run small business and do not pay the city’s $125 business licenses fee. The city hired a private detective to obtain IRS tax records of city residents and determine who has reported small business income to the IRS but not paid for a license.
a) What arguments might the city government give in support for this action? What argument might privacy advocates give against it?
The arguments that the might the city government give in support for this action is that those small business that have defaulted in their payment are robbing the citizen of some basic amenities since the taxes is what is used to develop that place.
The argument that privacy advocates give against it is that small business are just coming up and they cannot pay that outrageous sum of money instead the tax should be reduce so as to accommodate them.
What is IRS paperwork?IRS forms are the written reports that people and corporations submit to the federal government detailing all of their financial transactions in order to determine their tax obligations.
Therefore, A fundamental method for nations to produce public revenues that enable them to support investments in human capital, infrastructure, and the provision of services for citizens and businesses is through the collection of taxes and levies.
Learn more about taxes from
https://brainly.com/question/1133253
#SPJ1
What is the minimum level of education required of new officer applicants by the majority of local police departments?
A high school diploma
An associate’s degree from an accredited community college
A GED
A bachelor's college degree
Answer:
A high school diploma, should be the right answer
in a court of law, which is the person who is crying out or complaining about a crime that has been committed against him called
In a court of law, the person who is crying out or complaining about a crime that has been committed against him is called Victim.
A victim is someone who has been harmed physically or emotionally, had their property damaged, or lost money as a result of a crime. Despite not being a party to criminal proceedings, victims of crime are an essential element of the criminal justice system. Their testimony is a crucial component of the prosecution's case against the defendant.
If victims feel their rights have not been upheld by a government department or agency, they have the right to file a complaint. The Canadian Victim Bill of Rights mandates that all federal departments and agencies must provide a method for victims to lodge complaints. A complaint against a provincial or territorial agency, such as the police or victim services, shall be handled in accordance with the relevant provincial or territorial laws.
Learn to know more about victims on
https://brainly.com/question/26767288
#SPJ9
Which are NOT reasons most state highway patrols have been reorganized and renamed the state police? Select all that apply.
A-The state police are not responsible for traffic offenses or anything to do with the state’s highway system.
B-With advances in mass transportation, the need for managing traffic on state highways has all but disappeared.
C-Population increases in states brought increased levels of crime and the need for a statewide police department; it made sense to simply expand the authority of the highway patrol.
D-Despite the name change and increased responsibility, most state police departments continue to enforce the state’s traffic laws.
The ones that are NOT reasons most state highway patrols have been reorganized and renamed the state police include:
B-With advances in mass transportation, the need for managing traffic on state highways has all but disappeared.
D-Despite the name change and increased responsibility, most state police departments continue to enforce the state’s traffic laws.
Who are the highway patrols?A highway patrol is either a police section formed basically for the essence of overseeing and enforcing traffic safety compliance on roads and highways, or a detail within an existing local or regional police agency that is majorly concerned with such duties.
Various types of Highway Patrols include the following:Accident investigationCommercial vehicle enforcementEducating the road users and the general publicCarrying out Emergency responseEnsuring there is law enforcementCarrying out the Traffic enforcementExecuting Highway Maintenance where necessary.Therefore, the correct answer is as given above.
learn more about highway patrols: https://brainly.com/question/24760080
#SPJ1
Oliver, an insurance agent and sole practitioner, decided to sell his insurance agency to Grace. Under the terms of the sales agreement, Grace paid $8,000 for the goodwill that Oliver had garnered throughout his insurance career. The purchase was completed on March 3, 2021. What is Grace's 2021 deduction for amortization?
Based on the amount that Grace paid for the goodwill that Oliver garnered for all the years in his insurance career, the deduction that Grace can apply as a 2021 deduction for amortization is $533.
How to find the amortization amount?When it comes to the United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles or GAAP as they are popularly known, Goodwill is to be amortized in a manner that reflects the type of acquisition that took place.
When the acquisition is done by one party buying another party's company along with its assets, then Goodwill is to be amortized over a period of 15 years while being tax deductible.
Grace bought over Oliver's insurance agency and so the $8, 000 Goodwill is subject to a 15 year amortization.
The amortization for 2021 that Grace can claim as a deduction is:
= 8, 000 / 15
= $533
Find out more on Goodwill amortization at https://brainly.com/question/14299490
#SPJ1
how do right-to-work laws diminish union power?
Answer: It allows workers the "right" to work. If they don't want to work, they don't have to. That in turn weakens the union.
Members of Congress_____
a bill when they want to recommend it
Members of Congress sponsor a bill when they want to recommend it.
How do Members of Congress recommend a bill?In order to recommend a bill to the House of Congress that the Member of Congress is in, the Member of Congress will have to act as a sponsor to the bill.
This means that they are the ones that will present the bill to the House for considered on voting for it to become law. For instance, if a Senator is the one that proposes a bill, that Senator will be the Bill's sponsor in the Senate.
In conclusion, a Member of Congress will sponsor a bill to recommend it.
Find out more on Members of Congress at https://brainly.com/question/16004954
#SPJ1
Give 5 solutions on how the proletariat won't be exploited?
Marxist theory holds that capitalism exploits the proletariat by requiring them to accept low wages in exchange for using the means of production that belong to the bourgeoisie, a class of landowners.
How the proletariat won't be exploited?Marx said that the bourgeoisie controlled all the power and compelled the proletariat to choose risky, low-paying employment in order to live by controlling money and the means of production.
Despite being larger, the proletariat was helpless against the bourgeoisie's will. Since the proletariat must first achieve political dominance, develop into the nation's dominant class, and establish itself as the nation, it is already national, if not in the bourgeois sense.
Because the worker no longer owns the product, which now belongs to the capitalist who bought the proletariat's labor force in return for exclusive control over the proletariat's products and all profit made by them, the worker is estranged from his or her product.
Learn more about the proletariat, here:
https://brainly.com/question/7942319
#SPJ1
Twenty-one Native law enforcement agencies today limit their criminal investigations to what type of offense?
A)crimes that involve the theft or misuse of natural resources
B)auto theft
C)crimes against individuals
D)crimes that involve theft by deception
Today, the 21 Native law enforcement agencies limit their criminal investigations to offense that involves involve the theft or misuse of natural resources.
What is known as criminal investigation?In law, a criminal investigation means an ensemble of methods by which crimes are studied and criminals apprehended. The criminal investigator involved in getting facts seeks to ascertain the methods, motives, identities of criminals as well as the identity of victims and may interrogate witnesses.
Often times, the identification of a criminal who has left no fingerprints or conclusive evidence can be advanced by an analysis of the modus operandi whereby the professional criminals tend to stick to a certain technique (such as forcing entrance) to seek certain types of boots which leave a certain trademark (such as means by which a victim is tied up)
The departments of criminal-investigation does compile these data, lists of stolen and lost property and have ready access to such public records as automobile and firearms registrations as well as other private records such as laundry and dry-cleaners’ marks, pawnshop, secondhand-dealers’ transactions etc.
Read more about criminal investigation
brainly.com/question/28607263
#SPJ1
______ is defined as the power to declare a government action unconstitutional, and is one of the oldest and perhaps most important responsibilities of the judicial branch.
Judicial review is defined as the power to declare a government action unconstitutional and is one of the oldest and perhaps most important responsibilities of the judicial branch.
Judicial review refers to a nation's courts' capability to determine if the legislative, executive, and administrative departments of government are functioning in conformity with the constitution. Any activities considered to be in contravention of the Constitution are considered invalid and null. A written constitution is essential for the organization of legal challenge in this sense. Judicial review power of the courts basically restricts the executive of the country to act arbitrarily. Due to presence of judicial review the executive will not be allowed to pass any law with is not in accordance with the constitution.
Learn more about judicial review here:
https://brainly.com/question/966716
#SPJ4
3
When protecting the president, the Secret Service must ensure that the president is never more than a few minutes away from a:
A.Hotel
B.Hospital
C.police station
D.ambulance
When protecting the president, the Secret Service must ensure that the president is never more than a few minutes away from a Trauma Hospital.
How does the President's security come from the Secret Service?The Secret Service is distinct from other federal law enforcement organizations because, in addition to protecting visiting heads of state and governments, the president and vice president of the United States, and their families, as well as former presidents, presidential candidates, and other high-profile individuals, its agents also conduct criminal investigations—the agency's original mandate from 1865.
Both investigative and protective, they.
They need to provide safe sites for the president in case of an assault, locate nearby trauma hospitals, request a motorcade route through town, and clear airspace at the airport during the president's arrival, among other things.
To learn more about the secret service, refer
https://brainly.com/question/16979419
#SPJ13
Why was Ronald Cotton convicted of ra_pe and burglary?
Ronald Cotton was convicted of ra_pe and burglary because he was the only suspect as at the time of the incidents and all all evidence led to him.
What was the incident that occured in the 1984 that brought about the case of Ronald?The incident that occurred in the 1984 that brought about the case of Ronald was that there was a burglary whereby someone broke into the house and assaulted a woman there which made the people fo the house to call on the police so that they can investigated the matter on ground.
However, Ronald Cotton was able to convicted because he was the only suspect and some of the evidence led to him, however it was a wrong conviction.
Read more about burglarat:
https://brainly.com/question/12329009
#SPJ1
What does knowledge mean to you? Using Apple's theorizations and a quote, how is that knowledge acquired and conceptualized? How is the curriculum in this course being used to shape your perspective? 250 word response
My definition of knowledge includes being aware of facts, having practical skills, and being familiar with things or circumstances. Knowledge of facts, also known as propositional knowledge, is frequently characterized as accurate belief that is separate from opinion or speculation by reason.
How is knowledge produced?There are a variety of techniques to produce knowledge. The use of the five senses is considered to be the most significant source of information. Introspection is also considered by many theorists to be a source of knowledge, albeit knowledge of one's own mental states rather than knowledge of external physical objects. Memory, rational intuition, inference, and witness are some more frequently mentioned sources. According to foundationalism, certain of these sources are fundamental in that they are able to support ideas independently of other mental states. Coherentists dispute this notion, arguing that knowledge requires a high level of coherence across all of the believer's mental states. The study of knowledge encompasses a wide range of topics, and it is important to many academic fields.
To learn more about knowledge, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28025185
#SPJ13
3. Discuss the reasons for why it is important for criminal justice professionals to study ethics
Because ethics contribute to the effectiveness and efficiency of the criminal justice system, they are crucial. Therefore, people who work in the criminal justice system need to be able to make moral judgements.
What is meant by ethics?Systematizing, defending, and proposing conceptions of right and bad action are all part of the field of philosophy known as ethics, or moral philosophy. Axiology, a subfield of philosophy that includes both aesthetics and ethics, is concerned with issues of value. The foundation of ethics is a set of well-founded moral standards that outline what is appropriate behavior for people to engage in. These standards are typically expressed in terms of rights, obligations, social benefits, fairness, or particular virtues. The Foundational Rules of Ethics. Justice, autonomy, nonmaleficence, and beneficence are the four guiding principles of ethics.Learn more about ethics here:
https://brainly.com/question/26273329
#SPJ10
What might explain the inconsistencies between real-world prosecutors and those in the movies? Make sure you mention the title and year of the film.
One thing that might explain why real-world prosecutors and those in movies are not consistent is the need for dramatic effect in movies.
This is shown in the movie series, Suits, which was released from 2011.
Why can the real world and movies be different?Movies often have to include a dramatic storyline in order to be able to sell the movie to people and get them interested. As a result, this can lead to inconsistencies between real life and movies.
We see an example of this in the movie series called Suits. Here, the protagonist is a lawyer who never got called to the bar and so should not be practicing law. This is different from the real-world where such an action would be found out and criminally prosecuted.
Find out more on inconsistencies at https://brainly.com/question/20163712
#SPJ1
The E-SIGN Act allows for:
Answer: down there
Explanation:
The E-Sign Act allows the use of electronic records to satisfy any statute, regulation, or rule of law requiring that such information be provided in writing, if the consumer has affirmatively consented to such use and has not withdrawn such consent.
1. How close of a connection do you think authorities should have to demonstrate between a suspect and terror groups before they get permission to collect data or surveil the suspect?
2. Does it matter to you if the suspect is a US citizen or not? If so, why? If not, why not?
Answer:
Explanation:
1. How close of a connection do you think authorities should have to demonstrate between a suspect and terror groups before they get permission to collect data or surveil the suspect?
2. Does it matter to you if the suspect is a US citizen or not? If so, why? If not, why not?
Mr. Sinclair has diabetes and heart trouble and is generally satisfied with the care he has received under Original Medicare, but he would like to know more about Medicare Advantage Special Needs Plans (SNPs). What could you tell him?
a.
Since SNPs don’t cover prescription drugs Mr. Sinclair should consider a different option.
b.
SNPs offer care from any doctor or hospital Mr. Sinclair would like to use and his costs will always be lower than in Original Medicare.
c.
SNPs are essentially the same as Original Medicare and are not likely to have a noticeable impact on how Mr. Sinclair receives his care.
d.
SNPs have special programs for enrollees with chronic conditions, like Mr. Sinclair, and they provide prescription drug coverage that could be very helpful as well.
D. SNPs have special programs for enrollees with chronic conditions, like Mr. Sinclair, and they provide prescription drug coverage that could be very helpful as well one can tell him. Coordinated Care Plans, SNPs, and MA Plan Types.
Who qualifies for Medicare Part D?
Part D prescription coverage is available to anyone 65 and older who are eligible for or are currently enrolled in Medicare. People who have been diagnosed with end-stage renal disease and those who have been receiving Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits for more than 24 months are also eligible.
To know more about Medicare, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/14011571
#SPJ9
There are over 300 crime labs in the country and every city has at least one lab. a. True b. False
the sixth amendment is the basis for the right
a) to a delayed trial.
b) of free speech.
c) of assembly.
d) to counsel
The best choice is option (d). The basis for the right to counsel is the sixth amendment.
What does the sixth amendment go by?Right to a Speedy Trial by Jury, Witnesses, and Counsel under the Sixth Amendment | The National Constitution Center.
According to Supreme Court case law, the Sixth Amendment right to counsel expressly requires that every adult who lacks the financial means to retain counsel at the going rate for services in his jurisdiction be provided with a skilled and qualified attorney.
What rights are granted under the sixth amendment?The Sixth Amendment ensures the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to an unbiased jury, the right to a public trial without undue delay, the right to counsel, and the right to know the identity of your accusers as well as the specifics of the allegations and supporting documentation.
Learn more about sixth amendment: https://brainly.com/question/905718
#SPJ13
A member of the Tampa, Florida City Council described the camera and face recognition system installed in Tampa neighborhood (Section 2.2.2) as “ a public safety tool no different from having a cop walking around with a mug shot.” Is he right? What are some similarities and differences relevant to privacy, between the camera system and a cop walking around?
The difference between the camera and a cop walking around is that cops don't always walk around all the time. However, the camera is always monitoring. The subject of security versus privacy is always going to be one that can be described as a tradeoff.
How is the Camera Better?Although the camera is also monitored by the police, it is less subjective. Policy interaction can have elements of subjectivity when it comes to what happened at a crime scene.
This subjectivity is also extended to incorporate what sometimes happens between cops and "suspects". Sometimes, police brutality has been recorded and there was no way to prove it.
The camera installed acts like an arbiter of data that provides objective evidence regardless of who is involved. It has been postulated that as society evolves into a place where there are no more crimes, the systems preventing crime and checking them become redundant.
Learn more about security:
https://brainly.com/question/25720881
#SPJ1
jeff is a drug dealer in california who sells a number of illegal narcotics. police obtain a warrant to search his home and position an undercover car outside. on the drive home, jeff is stopped by the lapd for a routine traffic violation - his right tail light had burned out. when the officer pulled jeff over, he shone his flashlight and noticed a gun in jeff’s back seat. after being placed in custody, the officer asks jeff to search his car. when jeff says nothing, he is asked to step out of the car. the officer opens the back door and pulls out a locked, opaque case, which had 30 helium balloons inside. helium balloons are illegal as a schedule 1 narcotic under us law, and jeff is charged with possession of illegal narcotics. jeff files a lawsuit claiming his 4th amendment right was violated and loses. why did the court rule that way?
The court ruled that Jeff's 4th Amendment right was not violated because of a. The officers had an exception to the warrant requirement: Exigent Circumstances.
What is the 4th Amendment?The Fourth Amendment offers American citizens the right and protection from unreasonable government searches and seizures.
However, the Fourth Amendment does not guarantee a citizen that reasonable searches and seizures cannot be conducted when there are exigent circumstances.
What are exigent circumstances?Exigent circumstances are complicated circumstances that might warrant a person to be searched and incriminating evidence seized.
Exigent circumstances can be invoked with a warrant to search Jeff's home for the following purposes:
Prevent physical harm to personsEvidence DestructionSuspect's escapeOther frustrating consequences.Thus, the court's ruling against Jeff's 4th Amendment rights shows that Option A was correct.
Learn more about the 4th Amendment rights at https://brainly.com/question/17104412
#SPJ1
Question Completion with Answer Options:
a. The officers had an exception to the warrant requirement: Exigent Circumstances
b. The officers had an exception to the warrant requirement: Stop and Frisk
c. No exception occurs; the warrant to search Jeff was valid and the search did not exceed the scope of that warrant.
d. The officers had an exception to the warrant requirement: Search Incident to Lawful Arrest (SILA)
Steve files head of household. In 2022, he received $23,000 in social security benefits, $10,000 in taxable retirement income, and $4,000 in interest and dividend income. Using the Social Security Benefits Worksheet - Line 6a and 6b, determine Steve's taxable social security benefits.
$0
Answer:
Since Steve files as a head of household, the social security benefits will be taxable up to 50% in the range of $25,000 to $34,000. While computing the limit, retirement income, interest, and dividend income does not form part of the social security benefits, however, in the given situation, the social security benefits are $23,000 which is below the limit of $25,000 and therefore not taxable. Hence Steve's taxable Social Security benefits will be $0.
Explanation:
In this chapter, we quoted a legal expert as saying, “In the adversary system the goal of the advocate is not to determine the truth but to win . . ..” Does this mean that prosecutors and defense attorneys should behave unethically in court? Why or why not? Give an example of rules that are in place to ensure that prosecutors and defense attorneys act ethically in court proceedings.
Since In the adversary system the goal of the advocate is not to determine the truth but to win . .” It does not mean that prosecutors and defense attorneys should behave unethically in court, it just mean that they hard to do what they need to do so as to win their case in a legal manner through questioning and use of evidence.
What is the adversary approach?This system is where an impartial individual or group of people, typically a judge or jury, who try to ascertain the truth and pass judgment in accordance with it, is presented with two advocates presenting their parties' case or position under the adversarial system, also known as the adversary system, in common law countries.
In its most basic form, an adversarial system settles disputes by presenting opposing points of fact and law to a neutral, often uninvolved arbiter, who then chooses which side prevails.
Hence, a method to conflict in which the harder, more aggressive negotiator prevails and the more accommodative loses. The adversarial strategy encourages rivalry among negotiators.
Learn more about adversary system from
https://brainly.com/question/5921518
#SPJ1
What is the advantage of requiring all Clery reports to be presented in a similar format?
A-Using the same format allows the reader to easily compare statistics from two or more campuses.
B-All colleges can use the same printer and save on production costs.
C-Using the same format makes it easier to collect the data in the first place.
D-There is no advantage to using the same format from one campus to another.
The advantage of requiring all Clery reports to be presented in a similar format is option A. Using the same format allows the reader to easily compare statistics from two or more campuses.
Same format allows the report to be the same, similar in all section and easily identify differences. Same format of celery report will follow same pattern and have the same order of presentation with same heading.
What is a clery report?The Clery Act demands colleges and universities that involve in federal financial aid programs to have and project details about crime on and near their different campuses.
Aligning with the directive is examined by the United States Department of Education which may place civil penalties, up to $58,328 per violation, against schools for each default and can suspend institutions from participating in federal student financial aid programs.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above.
learn more about Clery report: https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ1