Which figure of speech does Henry David Thoreau use in the following example: "I grew in those seasons like corn in the night..."? pl help me

Answer:

من الإتفاقيات الموقعة بين الإمارات والبرازيل

إتفاقية التعاون العسكري

إتفاقية التعاون في المجالات الإجتماعية

إتفاقية التعاون الرياضي

Answer: Phonetics is divided into three types according to the production (articulatory), transmission (acoustic) and perception (auditive) of sounds. Three categories of sounds must be recognised at the outset: phones (human sounds), phonemes (units which distinguish meaning in a language), allophones (non-distinctive units).

Explanation:

NOT MY WORK! I HOPE IT HELPS THO!

Answer:

which language can't understand plz comment me in English.I will try to help you

Answer:

نمو نبات القرم عند

المناطق الصحراوية

المناطق المرتفعة

المناطق الغربية والشرقية

سفوح التلال

I cant see the whole question, sorry!!

Answer:

She was about to hang up when I answered the phone.

Answer:

Здравствуйте

Explanation:

The correct matching of term definition for each of the scenarios above is given below:

To show the order of items - Ranking

Done before providing details - Simple list

To register names of items - Listing and ordering

To create a visual list on dominant hand- Establishing the people or items on a list

This is act of correctly defining the meaning of terms to their exact description. It means giving a simple explanation of what something represent

So therefore, to show the order of items is to ranking, done before providing details is to simple list, to register names of items is to listing and ordering

Learn more about term definition:

https://brainly.com/question/9823471

#SPJ1

Answer:it’s a formal definition

Explanation:

Answer:  Qual é a principal diferença entre o utilitarismo e a ética de Kant?

O utilitarismo quer que ajamos de forma a sermos benéficos ou menos prejudiciais à soma dos outros. O kantismo respeita os direitos humanos e a lei da igualdade. (Dodds, Aula 2) A teoria moral kantiana e o utilitarismo são duas teorias que tentam responder à natureza ética dos seres humanos.

Explanation:

Answer:

??? didint understadn

Explanation:

The correct answer is B) Medical advances improved the standard of living for most people in developed nations, but only for few people in developing nations.

The statement that best describes the impact of medical advances on global standards of living is "Medical advances improved the standard of living for most people in developed nations, but only for few people in developing nations."

Scientific advances represent a great opportunity to increase the quality of life of humans. The problem is that they cost a lot of money and just the fortunate ones in the developed countries who have money and health insurance, can pay for these innovations.

Unfortunately, in developing and poor countries, this is not the case. These medical technology and health advancements are so expensive and cannot be afforded by most people. They have to go to public hospitals to receive medical help or to get major surgeries.

We have the examples of millions of people in Africa, India, Central Amércica, or Latin America, who just have access to public health services.

Answer: the answers A

Explanation:

Answer:

All could be the answer, but I think the most important answer choices are 1 or 2

Explanation:

It's important to express how you feel/think so the both of you can come up with solutions. After that, they can do the same and express how they feel

Answer:

True,

Example: "I hate spider's!" or "I HATE SPIDER'S" would be like the persons dislikes or hates spiders, if they said "I hate spiders" or "i'm afraid of spiders" would mean they aren't fond of spiders but not terrified. Understand?

Answer:

добре звучи добре

Explanation:

Answer:

Subject : You (implied)

Predicate : do not speak ill of everyone

Explanation:

The subject and predicate differs in that ; the doer of an action, either a person or thing is called the subject, while the action being performed or information about the subject is called the predicate.

In the sentence Given above;

Do not speak ill of everyone - This statement points to an action performed, that is speaking of people, which should be the predicate as it gives advise to the subject about what should not be done.

The subject here is implied, this is the person being referred to in the sentence and could be 'You'

Hence, an explicit sentence, would be :

You should not speak ill of everyone.

You - /subject

Do not speak ill of everyone - predicate

Answer:

nose

Explanation:

Answer:

number C A description of the socio-politicql.........

Answer:

what?

Explanation:

Answer:

Three of them remembered the teacher who taught them physics.

Explanation:

Answer:

1 Elige la forma correcta del verbo para decir adónde van los estudiantes. Escribe el verbo en el espacio blanco.

Explanation:

Answer:

whatt?

Explanation:

Choose: C. There will always be heat coming from the sun.

Answer:

C give the other guy brainliest

The affirmation is true, information about uncertainty can help identify both the potential positive outcomes (upside risks) and the potential negative outcomes (downside risks).

By understanding the uncertainties surrounding a situation, decision-makers can assess the likelihood and potential impact of various outcomes. This allows them to make more informed choices, anticipate challenges, and develop strategies to mitigate risks.

Therefore, information about uncertainty is valuable in assessing both the upside and downside risks associated with a particular scenario or decision. In general, as a matter of fact, the more informed we are about a certain situation or scenario, the more well-equipped we are to make a decision that suits us and others.

Thus, we conclude the affirmation ti be true.

Learn more about uncertainty here:

https://brainly.com/question/3998745

#SPJ1

Answer:

D. Robust and Opinionated

Explanation:

Explanation:

what ere you say?i don't know what you say.