Background information: This is a journal entry from a soldier fighting on the western front. Which statement best describes how this soldier felt about the trench rats? He was disgusted by them. He thought they were helpful. He thought they were annoying. He thought they were cute.
Option A or the first option is the correct answer that describes the soldier's feeling.
What is the background Information?The tremendous amount of rats is the most amazing aspect of trench life. They've invaded the entire area.
You can't keep them out no matter what you do.
They become quite obese as a result of all the food they steal from humans.
They're repulsive to look at, and some are as big as cats.
Therefore, the soldier was feeling disgusted by the rats.
Learn more about the Soldiers information, refer below
https://brainly.com/question/10058128
Answer:
He was disgusted by them.
Explanation:
What were the results of the revolutionary uprisings that occurred throughout europe in 1848.
In the Anglo-French conflict in North America, the primary advantage of the ______ was having a greater number of subjects on the continent.
a. Native peoples.
b. French.
c. Russians.
d. British.
Answer:
d
Explanation:
british
We do not have a checks and balances system in our government.
True
False
False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
The U.S. government exercises checks and balances through its three branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.
Answer:
See below.
Explanation:
The answer is true. "It provides a system of balance in the government."
-hope it helps
In colombia, doing what action is considered rude during a conversation?.
Backing away is the action that is considered rude during a conversation.
What is a Conversation?This is the process in which people communicate with each other through interactions.
Interactions are meant to be done through speaking, facial expressions and hand gestures where necessary. It is however considered rude when individuals back away especially in Colombia.
Read more about Conversation here https://brainly.com/question/24549573
Answer:
backing away.
Explanation:
Who was the first significant lawgiver to the Athenians whose name today is a byword for anything harsh
Answer:Greek lawgiver. (flourished 7th century bc), Athenian lawgiver whose harsh legal code punished both trivial and serious crimes in Athens with death—hence ...
Explanation:
The correct answer is Draco ( Drakōn; fl. c. 7th century BC), also called Draco or Drakon, was the first recorded legislator of Athens in Ancient Greece. He replaced the prevailing system of oral law and blood feud with a written code to be enforced only by a court of law.
Who was Draco in Greek mythology?In Roman mythology, Draco was one of the Giant Titans who warred with the Olympian gods for ten years. He was killed in battle by the goddess Minerva and thrown into the sky, where it froze around the North Pole.
Who was Draco of Athens?Draco also spelled Dracon, (flourished 7th-century bc), was an Athenian lawgiver whose harsh legal code punished both trivial and serious crimes in Athens with death—hence the continued use of the word draconian to describe repressive legal measures.
Learn more about Athenians at https://brainly.com/question/8075169
#SPJ2
HELP ASAP!!!!!! 50 POINTS!!!!
Analyze the excerpts and then choose the best answer to finish the statement below.
13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution:
Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. Ratified: December 6, 1865
14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution:
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. Ratified: July 9, 1868
15th Amendment to the U.S. constitution:
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition or servitude. Ratified: February 3, 1870.
The Constitutional amendments adopted during Reconstruction were intended to...
-provide legal and political rights for African Americans
-end property and religious qualifications for voting
-correct problems with equal representation
-readmit the southern states who seceded back into the union
trust me its c because the run mat and why you i have
Who was the mormon leader who was killed by a mob in illinois in 1844?.
Answer: Joseph Smith
Explanation: Give me the brainliest
Which event was centered around answering this question? Can a state overturn a federal law?
Depending on the time period, it was made when states wanted to secede.
What are the commanding generals (both union & confederate)
Answer:
i think general lee and Meade
Explanation:
if your meaning what i think its Meade is the union and general lee is confederate
Who was the first president of Zimbabwe?
After the United States won the revolutionary war, they got land from britain. what was this land called
Answer:
In 1783 the United States received a huge territory from Great Britain as part of the peace treaty ending the revolutionary war. This new region stretched from the Appalachian Mountains to the Mississippi River, and from Canada to Spanish Florida.
Explanation:
In one word, describe how the League of
Nations reacted to aggressive dictators mobilizing and
invading other countries?
(HELP PLASE ASAP I ONLY HAVE 5 mins TO DO THSI EILL NE GIVING BRAIN)Why is capital considered a factor of production?
O Capital can be used to start new businesses.
O Capital offers natural resources as raw materials.
Capital includes the workforce that produces goods.
O Capital includes the workforce
that provides services.
Answer:
Capital offers natural resources as raw materials.
Explanation:
By increasing productivity through improved capital equipment, more goods can be produced and the standard of living can rise. Capital is an important factor of production because it's what allows labor and land to be purchased.As a factor of production, capital refers to the purchase of goods made with money in production.
According to Mentor, what kind of leader was Ulysses before he left Ithaca?
Explain 2 reasons used to justify war with Mexico in the 1800’s.
Answer:
"The United States was justified in going to war because Mexico had shed American blood on American soil, Texas (a land that many Mexicans still considered theirs) was an independent republic and had the right to govern itself, and Texas was trying to become part of the United States, which means that the United States had a right to be involved, too."
Explanation:
"Mexico had encouraged Americans to settle in the province of Texas, which was part of Mexico at the time. After the Texans and Mexicans fought, Texas won its independence from Mexico in 1836. Now, in 1846, America sent a troop of men lead by General Zachary Taylor to the Texan border to make sure the Mexicans weren’t attempting to attack Texas (Doc B). This angered the Mexicans since it made it seem like Texas was now allied with America. The dispute that followed led to the death of sixteen Americans. Also, the Mexicans chose to believe that the arrival of General Zachary Taylor was an outright attack, which lead to the battles of Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma (Doc C). This shows that Mexico had taken the first step of fighting the United States. Eventually, the Mexicans were forced to surrender. As to which side fired first, this cannot be determined. In one letter to Congress, James Polk stated, “We have tried every effort at reconciliation. The cup of forbearance had been exhausted even before the recent information from the frontier of the Del Norte. But now, …Mexico has passed the boundary of the United States, has invaded our territory and shed American blood upon the American soil” (Doc B).
Before Texas became part of the United States, it was an independent republic. An independent republic has the right to govern itself and set itself apart from other nations. Texas regarded the Rio del Norte to be the Texan border (Doc B). This means that Texas now has the choice to do whatever they wish. Charles Sumner, a state legislator from Massachusetts, said, “…in seeking extension of slavery, (our own citizens denied) the great truths of American freedom” (Doc D). If Texas is independent, it has the right to own slaves. Also, states in the United States already owned slaves, so the point cannot be argued any further. Sumner also said Americans brought slaves in Mexico in defiance of Mexican law (Doc D). However, Mexico invited Americans into Mexico and Mexico should have realized that Americans would have different ways. Also, Texas was trying to become part of the United States, which meant that the United States had a right to go to war with Mexico.
Since Mexico could not govern all of its territory, they invited Americans in. Now that Americans were settling in unpopulated Mexican territory, the ratio of Americans to Mexicans increased (Doc A). Eventually, the American lifestyle took over, and demanded different rights. In Document C, Velasco-Marquez said the treaty signed between Texas and the U.S. and also the fact that Texas wanted to be annexed to the U.S. was an act of war. Texas had the right to be a part of the U.S., and if Mexico considered this an act of war with Texas, then the U.S. had the right to be involved too (Doc C). Finally, James Polk said, “The invasion was threatened solely because Texas had determined…to annex herself to our Union” (Doc B). If that is true, then America did have the right to declare war.
Once Mexico showed aggression to Texas, the United States had a right to go to war with Mexico because Texas was an independent republic and wanted to be annexed into the United States. Whatever Texas does, Mexico cannot have a stake in it. From these points, it can be concluded that the United States was justified in going to war with Mexico."
Excerpt from textbook.
In summer 1950, 13 parents in topeka, ks were not allowed to register their children for what?.
Kids were not allowed to register at School because of their dark skin colour.
ExplanationIn Summer 1950, 13 Parents in Topeka took their kids to a school that was in their neighbourhood for admission, but they were surprised to face a refusal for their kids admission due to their kids dark skin colour as a result the parents also filed a Lawsuit against the school.
ConclusionTherefore the answer is :
Kids were not allowed to register at School because of their dark skin colour.
Learn more History at https://brainly.com/question/26536735
In which year the ancient olympic games were stopped.
Who served as an interpreter for Lewis and Clark during their trip out west? (2 points)
Group of answer choices
Joseph Brant
Laura Secord
Sacagawea
Tecumseh
Answer:
C: Sacagawea
Explanation:
A widespread misperception of Lewis and Clark’s expedition of discovery involves two intrepid frontiersmen trekking their way across an uncharted continent accompanied by their Indian guide and interpreter Sacagawea. More recent popular interpretations have added recognition of Clark’s servant York and the presence of Lewis’ dog Seaman. The two U.S. Army captains actually led a well-organized group of individuals chosen for their specific skills that was formed around a “permanent party” of twenty-nine soldiers, two civilians under contract for special work with the War Department, and two dependents (increased to three after the birth of Sacagawea’s son), one of whom was Sacagawea. At various times, they also hired other civilians with particular talents to perform important tasks. Without minimizing her contribution to the expedition, she was neither the only guide, nor the lone interpreter.
The ability to communicate in Indian languages was one of those absolutely crucial capabilities that Lewis and Clark had to acquire in order to accomplish the diplomatic component of their mission. One must recall that there is no single American Indian language. The native inhabitants of the Great Plains spoke many different languages and dialects. Even those from within the same “language group,” are not always mutually intelligible. Long before contact with Europeans, the various Indian nations on the plains developed a system of hand signs that could be mutually understood in order to communicate, negotiate peace, establish military alliances, and conduct trade with one another. What made the Captains’ task of finding sufficient interpreters even more complex was the fact that they did not know how many different Indian tribes of the various nations would be encountered along the route
There was little difficulty in finding individuals who knew one or more of the Indian languages spoken along the lower Missouri River. French, Spanish, English and American settlers, trappers and traders had interacted with the tribes for years, and it was only natural that some of the frontiersmen married Indian women. The children of mixed white and Indian marriages often spoke the languages of both parents. George Drouillard (pronounced DREW-yar), the son of a French father and Shawnee mother, was one of them. Captain Lewis met Drouillard in Illinois while recruiting at Fort Massac, and recognized that his talents as a scout, hunter and interpreter would be most useful, and engaged his services. Lewis met Francois Labiche and Pierre Cruzatte in the Saint Charles and Saint Louis areas, and recruited them into the army as volunteers. Both men were the sons of French fathers and Indian mothers, and both spoke French and Omaha as well as English.
Next to the ability to speak one or more Indian languages, proficiency in French was a decided advantage. French-Canadian traders and trappers had lived among various Indian tribes for decades, and the expedition was sure to encounter a number of them along the way. Although he could not speak an Indian language, Private John Baptiste Lapage could translate French and English. Having him along gave Lewis and Clark one additional man who could speak to the traders’ language, which was sure to prove helpful when they met a Frenchman who spoke the language of his hosts.
\
Answer:
C
Explanation:
When did they stop using asbestos in popcorn ceilings.
Answer:
In 1977
Explanation:
In 1977, the U.S. Government banned the use of asbestos in ceiling finishes, and most ceilings installed after this date will not contain asbestos.
True or false:
Mystery compound y is most likely to be ionic
I need help, a girl stressing ova here : (
What was the significance of 1929 to american history.
How did William Howard Day influence change in the nineteenth century?
He founded a newspaper and spoke out against the war on Mexico.
He encouraged the British to stop buying cotton grown by enslaved people.
He published a narrative about his own life and wrote books about black history.
He sent a petition to the Massachusetts government asking for the right to vote.
It should be noted that William Howard Day influence change in the nineteenth century because He published a narrative about his own life and wrote books about black history.
According to this question, we are to discuss about the influence of
William Howard Day.
As a result of this we can see that during William Howard Day narrative about his own life and wrote books about black history was published.
Therefore, option C is correct.
Learn more about William Howard Day at:
https://brainly.com/question/26288982
What is the term for the period of political unrest and demands for democracy that began in 2011?
Answer:
began on 25 January 2011
Answer:
Arab Spring
Explanation:
began in 2011,demanded democracy in the Arab region.
what is one social effect of the Francis Cabot Lowell system?
Answer:
Lowell believed that by providing safety in the workplace, comfortable living conditions, and a socially positive living and working environment he could ensure a steady supply of labor. Lowell expanded his manufacturing interests, establishing larger mills on the Merrimack River in present-day Lowell, Massachusetts (a town named in his honor).
Explanation:
(PLEASE HELP PLEASEEE!!!). Which statement accurately describes one reform in the 19th century?
O Slavery ended in the United States, but the practice continued in Great Britain.
O Activists focused mainly on political reforms, il nt social reforms such as education.
O Women enjoyed fewer economic opportunities during the Industrial Revolution.
O Women began demanding greater freedom and rights, including the right to vote.
Answer:
itss AAAAAAA
Explanation:
What effect did the invention of interchangeable parts have on the American economy?
a This invention caused the price of goods to skyrocket due to increased production costs.
b
The prices of goods fell dramatically due to the fact that the machines producing the goods could be built and repaired more inexpensively.
c
America saw a boom in the export of mechanical parts to places like England, France, and New Spain.
d
This invention made it harder for people to violate patents
Can you pls help me answer a,b,c,or d it’s due soon
Answer:
It's C
Explanation:
If this is the person I think it is then yes it's C
Answer:
The answer is C.
Explanation:
Its C because he was born in a really poor family and then became wealthy.
In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), the Supreme Court established the ______ doctrine, arguing that it did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause.
Answer:
separate but equal
Explanation:
hope it helped
How did the Bible disprove the attacks by its enemies? Use complete sentences.
Answer:
Brainliest pls
Explanation:
However long the adversaries of The Bible acknowledge the reality of the Bible, it is somewhat simple to turn around assaults on the Bible essentially by citing part and refrain to demonstrate the Bible right. A few pundits, albeit not really foes of the Bible, portray this as roundabout thinking since it depends on the Bible to be right, to demonstrate it to be right. One reaction to this is to take scriptural sections that are affirmed by non-scriptural sources and utilize this proof to demonstrate the whole Bible right and entirely inerrant. Tragically, a few pundits persevere and say that nobody at any point asserted the Bible is never generally right, simply that it isn't generally so and besides that, there is no proof that it is in a profound way right.
Despite the fact that we can never really show the Bible to be in a profound way right, we can try to redirect these assaults by highlighting predictions in the Bible. On the off chance that predictions can be demonstrated to be valid, the Bible has probably been roused by God. The rub is that devotees acknowledge the predictions to be valid, however over and over cynics highlight motivations to uncertainty the actual truth of those predictions.
Eventually, we can involve the Bible and confidence to negate scriptural analysis as far as we could tell, however, we can never truly invalidate these assaults in the personalities of a very much informed pundit.