Answer:
The Fifth Amendment creates a number of rights relevant to both criminal and civil legal proceedings. In criminal cases, the Fifth Amendment guarantees the right to a grand jury, forbids “double jeopardy,” and protects against self-incrimination
the federalist system created under the constitution was designed to limit governmental power by creating a second layer of sovereignty in
The second layer of sovereignty created by the federalist system to limit governmental power is the state governments.
What is the federalist system?The federalist system is a system whereby the executive government tiers are divided into the Federal and State level
In conclusion, the second layer of sovereignty created by the federalist system to limit governmental power is the state governments.
Read more about federalist system
brainly.com/question/5496965
Why do you think the Allied forces chose to consolidate into the United Nations at the end of WWII? Can you think of another way they could have protected human rights around the world?
NO FILES
PLEASE HELPPPPPPPPPP
Answer: The United Nations (UN) was created at the end of World War II as an international peacekeeping organization and a forum for resolving conflicts between nations. The UN replaced the ineffective League of Nations, which had failed to prevent the outbreak of the Second World War. we could have Spoke up for what we care about, Volunteer or donate to a global organization, Choose fair trade & ethically made gifts, Listen to others' stories, Stay connected with social movements, Stand up against discrimination.
Explanation:
Why do you think the Allied forces chose to consolidate into the United Nations at the end of WWII? I think the Allied forces chose to consolidate into the United Nations at the end of WWII because they want to help decese violent movements like War, mass murder, or genocide from forming again. It was like protection. Can you think of another way they could have protected human rights around the world? No, I can't think of another way, I feel like this way was a good choice that affect us in the long wrong.
which of the following is a correct statement of federal preemption of state law under the supremacy clause? choose 2 answers.
The correct statements of federal preemption of state law under the Supremacy Clause include:
A state law that requires documentation of citizenship is preempted by the National Voter Registration Act because the act only requires a statement under oath.A state's attempt to regulate television and radio is preempted by federal law because the federal government has regulated the entire field.The Supremacy Clause is a provision in Article VI of the Constitution that states that the treaties and constitution laws of the United States are the supreme law of the land.
Under the Supremacy Clause, it should be noted that both state and local laws that conflict with federal laws are rendered invalid. The preemption in the Supremacy Clause is that federal law over state law.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/25261982
in a diversity case, federal trial courts are required to apply a _______ when considering a motion for a new trial based on the excessiveness of the verdict.
Answer:
State law standard.
In a diversity case, federal trial courts are required to apply a state law standard when considering a motion for a new trial based on the excessiveness of the verdict.
I hope this helped at all.Describe the three types of criminological expert evidence which can be given to the
court.
Describe the electoral process in primary and general elections?
Answer:
Primary:The primaries are elections between candidates of the same party with the purpose of electing one candidate in the November general election. Candidates should register by a pre-determined deadline in order to appear in their state’s primaries ballot.
General:within their parties, candidates square off against other parties. The highest elected office in the general election is the Presidency,
Explanation:
Hope it helps:)
criminal law recognizes that a defendant may not be responsible for a criminal act if his mental state was impaired by