Answer:
Viva Vittorio Emanuele Re D'Italia
Explanation:
People wanted a revolution
The word "Viva Verdi" means Long Live Victor Emmanuel, King of Italy.
Who Was Victor Emmanuel?After his brother Charles Emmanuel IV abdicated, Victor Emmanuel I, duke of Aosta, duke of Savoy, and king of Sardinia (1802–21), was born on July 24, 1759, in Turin, Kingdom of Sardinia, and died on January 10, 1824, in Moncalieri, close to Turin.
He took part in the First Coalition against French Revolution (1792–97). Victor Emmanuel I, duke of Aosta, duke of Savoy, and king of Sardinia (1802–21), was born on July 24, 1759, in Turin, Kingdom of Sardinia, and passed away on January 10, 1824, in Moncalieri, near to Turin. He succeeded his brother Charles Emmanuel IV, who had abdicated.
He joined the First Coalition to Resist the French Revolution (1792–97)
To learn more about Victor Emmanuel follow the link.
https://brainly.com/question/1401053
#SPJ2
What are the challenges we face today to uphold the rule of law? What about in the future?
Answer:
Anyone who holds that what matters most in politics is having the right people in power and not how power should be constrained will be unconvinced of the value of the rule of law. Neither will anyone who believes that institutions of public power are merely instruments of the ruling class that need to be dismantled rather than merely constrained. For the majority of modern democratic societies, however, the rule of law’s requirement that both rulers and the ruled be accountable to the law is of unquestionable value. To be sure, in the modern world, it is the liberal tradition that values the rule of law most highly. Liberals who are concerned with ways of protecting (and realizing) liberty in some form and averting threats to it view the rule of law as an overarching source of security. Nonetheless, there is substantial disagreement even among liberals over what exactly counts as a faithful application of the term and, even when that is pinned down, how it is to be accomplished.
In itself, the notion of the rule of law is not a faithful description of any state of affairs but a complex ideal that is even more complex to realize. Thus, there is reason to be skeptical about whether societies necessarily benefit from all that might be invoked under the term. The independence of the judiciary, for instance, is clearly a problem if the independence is misused to foster the sectoral privileges of judicial personnel or to allow unchallenged interpretations of the law. Heavy emphasis on the formal aspects of the rule of law—for example, on procedural justice—may distract from the content and consequences of those laws. Critics of a strictly formal conception of the rule of law argue that too much attention to legal process generates significant vices of its own in the form of exaggerated legalism and neglect of the political or real-world dimensions of legal conflicts. Excessive veneration of the law and legal procedures may be too costly if it inhibits independent social assessments of the merits of a given policy proposal or if the official mandate of “blindness” gives legitimacy to actions performed “according to the law” even when most people would oppose such acts. Some writers have charged, moreover, that the increasing domain of judges and lawyers—indeed, their encroachment into areas previously left to politicians and the electorate—entails the loss of much that is politically and democratically valuable.
In short, too much emphasis on procedures for preventing arbitrariness can lead to subverting the doing of justice according to what might otherwise find support in the rule of law, and the legal strictures then become themselves a form of arbitrariness that is no more legitimate. On the other hand, those who defend the negative value of the rule of law object to more substantive understandings of the ideal on the grounds that morally ambitious aspirations about the rule of law threaten to purge the concept of its specificity and usefulness. They argue that to open the concept to a whole host of extralegal considerations about substantive justice and wider societal goals is to conflate ideas about “the rule of law” with notions about “the rule of good law,” such that any distinction between the two is reduced to nothing. As a consequence, no discussion of the rule of law can be complete without some philosophical reflection on law, including on its purpose and meaning.
What was the main impact of John Brown’s Raid on Harpers Ferry? It reaffirmed most people's belief that abolitionists were too radical.
Answer:
Although the raid failed, it inflamed sectional tensions and raised the stakes for the 1860 presidential election. Brown's raid helped make any further accommodation between North and South nearly impossible and thus became an important impetus of the Civil War.
the source of carbon to plants in the carbon cycle is
What was the Three-Fifths Compromise?
1) a plan to remove three-fifth of slaves from the total population count of slave states
2) a plan to gradually reduce the number of slaves in the country
3) a plan to count three-fifths of slaves when assessing a state's number of representatives
4) the idea that three-fifths of all states should be free of slavery
Answer:
3, a plan to count three-fifths of slaves when assessing a state's number of representatives
Explanation:
hope this helps
Answer:
3) a plan to count three-fifths of slaves when assessing a state's number of representatives
Explanation:
Select all that apply.
Three steps leading to American involvement in Vietnam included:
commitment of support by Eisenhower
the Gulf of Tonkin resolution
military advisors sent by Kennedy
American aid to the Vietcong
Answer:
the Gulf of Tonkin resolution
military advisors sent by Kennedy
commitment of support by Eisenhower
Explanation:
Playwright Hwang states that much of the playwriting process is
The Playwright David Henry Hwang states that much of the play-writing process is staged reading, which enables the playwright to get a first-hand account and response of the audience before the final play is penned.
In most of his plays, Hwang used the opportunity to challenge the multiple misguided conceptions about ethnic identity and stereotypes, describing identity as fluid.
Thus, Hwang states that much of the play-writing process always involved staged reading while he listens in the background.
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/20306987
I need it fast asap no lin or bot
Answer:
the secretary of state
Explanation:
An election is a formal group decision-making process by which a population chooses an individual or multiple individuals hope this helps plz mark me brainliest :)
choose one segment on game of thrones and explain how and what kind or types of power shown on that part
Answer:
The part where Khalessi rides the drago and burns the whole city.
Explanation:
I think coercive power was being used because she was angry and usig her dragons to kill innocent people.
Explain the benefits and costs of a free trade agreement
Answer:
Benefits:
- Increases access to higher-quality and lower priced goods
- Higher growth rate
- Improves efficiency and innovation
- Drives competitiveness
- Promotes fairness
Cons:
- increasing job outsourcing
- poor working conditions
- degradation of natural resources
Explanation:
52:43
How did the goals of MacArthur affect Japan’s economy in the decades following World War II?Which statement best describes the Manhattan Project during World War II?
Answer:
Japan became one of the worlds strongest economies! I just took a quiz on this and this was the correct answer.
Explanation:
hope i help you ty
Which of the following was responsible
for the spread of Islam into parts of
Northern and Western Africa?
A. Umayyad Caliphate
B. Byzantine Empire
C. Abbasid Caliphate
D. The Mongols
Answer:
Following the conquest of North Africa by Muslim Arabs in the 7th century CE, Islam spread throughout West Africa via merchants, traders, scholars, and missionaries, that is largely through peaceful means whereby African rulers either tolerated the religion or converted to it themselves
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
The umayyad Caliphate
What was the impact of new farm equipment on urban Americans?
O A.
New machinery contributed to soil erosion, which led to the Dust Bowl.
B.
New machinery led to overproduction, which led to an increase in the price of food.
OC.
New machinery led to new jobs for individuals such as sharecroppers.
OD.
New machinery led to the banking crisis since farmers were unable to pay off loans.
Reset
Next
In the 1930s, drought and dust storms were caused by the introduction of new farm equipment in several sections of the country.
Drought and dust bowls were caused by over-cultivation, which resulted in the degradation of the uppermost layer of soil and a lack of support for plant roots. It also caused dust storms in the impacted areas on occasion.
So, option A is incorrect as this was the impact of new farm equipment on urban Americans.
The other options are incorrect as:
Option B is incorrect as An overabundance of food, according to basic economic laws, should result in a fall in price rather than an increase. In fact, prices fell so low that most farmers could no longer make a profit.Option C is incorrect as Although the new machinery resulted in an increase in jobs, the drought caused many farms to fail, forcing tens of thousands of people to flee to California.
Option D is incorrect as New machinery did not lead to the banking crisis.
Thus option A is correct for the following question.
For more information about new farm equipment on urban Americans:
https://brainly.com/question/13794159
Answer:
New machinery contributed to soil erosion, which led to the Dust Bowl.
Explanation:
Correct on Edmentum
Where did Suleiman go with his army?
Answer:
He moved into central Europe taking over parts of Hungary and Romania..
Explanation:
Suleiman carried out several military campaigns during his 46 year rule. He also built up a powerful navy and took control of the Mediterranean Sea.
The eyes of the owl and rabbit shown in the diagram each provide a different advantage.
Answer:
(Read Explanation)
Explanation:
The front-facing owl eyes allow the bird to accurately judge distance when swooping in on prey. The side-facing rabbit eyes allow the animal to detect the motion of possible predators.
The specialized eye types of these animals are examples of:
(a) disruptions of the natural balance
(b) the interdependence of living things
(c) adaptations for survival under certain conditions
(d) involuntary responses to stimuli
When swooping in on prey, the owl can properly measure distance because of its front-facing eyes. The animal can sense the movement of potential predators thanks to its side-facing rabbit eyes.
What is the distance?Distance is a numerical or qualitative measurement of the distance between two objects or places. The distance can refer to a physical length or an estimate based on other criteria in physics or common usage (e.g., “two counties over”). Because spatial cognition is a rich source of conceptual analogies in human thought.
These species' unique eye kinds include, for instance:
(a) Changes to the natural order
(b) The interconnectedness of all life.
(c) modifications for survival in specific environments
(d) uncontrollable reactions to stimuli
Therefore, Distance because of its front-facing eyes.
Learn more about distance here:
https://brainly.com/question/15172156
#SPJ2
dgdjgudydyidyidtidtidtdiyd
Answer:
Hey there,
Don't put unnecessary questions.
They are strictly prohibited in Brainly.
Answer:
yuppp.... what's the question????
If East and West Germany had not reunified, it is most likely that East Germany and West Germany would have remained equally strong. West Germany would have grown much stronger than East Germany. East Germany and West Germany would have grown increasingly weak. East Germany would have grown much stronger than West Germany.
Answer:
west germany could have grown strong while east germany could have been weak. as American west germany was developing where as soviet economy was crumbling. they can't afford to east germany. so west germany with the help of Britain France usa would be more Powerful than east soviet germany. pls mark brainliest
If East and West Germany had not reunified, it is most likely that West Germany would have grown much stronger than East Germany due to its more developed economy and infrastructure. East Germany would have continued to struggle with its socialist economic model and lack of foreign investment, leading to its gradual decline over time. Therefore, option B is correct.
Why East and West Germany had not reunified?East and West Germany were divided after World War II and were separated by political, ideological, and economic differences. The East adopted a socialist economy model, while the West embraced capitalism.
The two Germanys were also part of different political blocs, with the East being aligned with the Soviet Union, and the West with the United States and its Western European allies.
The Cold War tensions between the two sides, coupled with East Germany's tight control over its citizens, made reunification a distant prospect for many years. However, the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War created a more favorable environment for reunification, which eventually took place in 1990.
Learn more about Cold War here:
https://brainly.com/question/2765211
#SPJ5
Describe one way Jefferson's policies represented a continuation of the previous presidents' policies. the policies of Jefferson .
One way that Jefferson's policies showed a continuation of the previous president's policies was on the area of the neutrality of the United States during the wars in Europe.
The United States took a neutrality stand from the time when the president was George Washington.
The neutrality policy was done to show America's stand concerning the raging war that had taken over Europe.
As president, Jefferson passed the embargo Act. This act banned the ships from Britain from all of the ports of the US. He also banned all trades from Europe.
This was done in order for the Europeans to respect the neutrality stand of the United States.
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/14556587?referrer=searchResults
how are performances similar and different from wriiter stories
Answer:
Many performances begin with written stories. Similarly, many written stories are eventually turned into stage productions. However, there are numerous disparities between the two mediums that must be addressed. Scripts are used to create performances. These usually comprise all of the instructions that the actors and crew must follow, such as tone of voice and facial expressions. This is left to the reader's imagination in written texts. Furthermore, written materials must be very thorough in terms of location and atmosphere, as the reader must be able to visualize all of this on his or her own. This, on the other hand, is expressed through acting during a performance.
Explanation:
Thank You! Please Mark Brainliest! :)
Who states that having an empire will make the United States stronger?
Answer:
Lodge just did it
Explanation:
Answer:
Admiral Alfred T. Mahan
Explanation:
i am very confident about this answer, sorry if i am wrong
The bill of rights amendments 1-10
Answer:
1. Freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition.
2. Right to keep and bear arms in order to maintain a well regulated militia.
3. No quartering of soldiers.
4. Freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures.
5. Right to due process of law, freedom from self-incrimination, double jeopardy.
6. Rights of accused persons, e.g., right to a speedy and public trial.
7. Right of trial by jury in civil cases.
8. Freedom from excessive bail, cruel and unusual punishments.
9. Other rights of the people.
10. Powers reserved to the states.
Explanation:
The Sumerians mainly used cuneiform to
А
write decrees and challenges to other kingdoms.
B
keep track of taxes and government issues.
с
write the world's first dramas and comedies.
D
create complex drawings and love poems.
Answer:
I'm pretty sure it's B
Explanation:
it was used to record a variety of information such as temple activities, business and trade. *Sorry if it's incorrect.*
Look at the screen shot.
Answer:
what do you need
help with
Explanation:
How was Mexico's struggle for independence similar to and different from the founding of the United States?
Answer:
Mexico was first populated more than 13000 years ago before the Spanish conquered and colonized the country in the 16th century.
Who lost his Savannah homes to the
British during the Revolutionary War?
A. gwinnett
b. hall
c.walton
Answer:
B hall......................
Hall lost his Savannah homes to the British during the Revolutionary War Option(b) is correct. The Loyalists were the conspicuous victors in the Transformation; they acquired freedom, the option to rehearse delegate government.
What is a Revolutionary War?Battle of public freedom, clashes battled by ethnicities to acquire autonomy. Defiance, a refusal of submission or request.
The English conflict exertion in the long run hit a wall and came to a standstill at Yorktown. On October 19, 1781, Cornwallis gave his battered armed force over to the Americans the English systems had fizzled.
Somewhere in the range of 25,000 and 70,000 American Nationalists kicked the bucket during dynamic military assistance. Of these, roughly 6,800 were killed in fight, while something like 17,000 kicked the bucket from illness. Most of the last kicked the bucket while detainees of battle of the English, for the most part in the jail ships in New York Harbor.
After French help assisted the Mainland Armed force with compelling the English acquiescence at Yorktown, in 1781, the Americans had successfully won their autonomy, however battling wouldn't officially end until 1783.
Therefore Option(b) is correct.
Learn more about Revolutionary War here:
brainly.com/question/1466912
#SPJ2
Which statements about how Federalists and Anti-Federalists felt about the Constitution are true?
Choose all answers that are correct.
A.The Anti-Federalists demanded that the Constitution include a bill of rights to guarantee personal freedoms.
B .The Federalists at first argued that a bill of rights was not needed in the Constitution.
CThe Anti-Federalists created a second draft of the Constitution, this time adding a bill of rights, and ratified their version.
DThe Federalists finally relented and promised to add a bill of rights to the Constitution, which cleared the way for its ratification.
What is the purpose of the preamble to the Constitution?
A.to enumerate the powers given to the federal government and to establish that other powers are reserved for state governments
B.to guarantee the individual freedoms of American citizens, including the freedom of speech and the right to bear arms
C.to spell out the powers granted to each branch of the federal government and to establish a system of checks and balances between them
D.to establish that the government derives its power from the people and to introduce the six purposes of government in serving the people
Answer:
part1 B ........
part 2 B
HELP ASAP ILL MAKE BRAINIEST!!!!
All were reasons for a decline in the support of prohibition by the late 1920s, except
options:
Prohibition was difficult to enforce.
There was an increase in the illegal production and sale of liquor.
There was a rise in gang violence and other crimes.
There was a 30% drop in alcohol consumption in the U.S.
Answer:
D - There was a 30% drop in alcohol consumption in the U.S
Which of the following BEST explains the growing popularity of the Ku Klux Klan throughout the South in the 1860s and 1870s? A The organization capitalized on Southerners' fear of the changes that occurred after the Civil War. B The organization established the first public high schools and universities in many Southern states. C The organization built many large factories and helped the South became a major manufacturing center. D The organization was the dominant political party in the South and helped influence federal policy.
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
The Klan capilized on the fears of blacks having equal rights to whites and the ability to vote in the elections.
what dis prometheus do the angered zeus
Answer: What did Prometheus do that angered Zeus? Zeus was so outraged by Prometheus’ theft of fire and he decided to punish the Titan by having him taken far to the east, here Prometheus was chained to a rock (or pillar) and Zeus sent an eagle to eat the Titan’s liver everyday and everyday that liver would grow back for the eagle to consume againtthe next day.
Explanation:
CAN SOMEONE WHO IS REALLY GOOD AT HISTORY HELP ME PLEASE
Answer:
Patriarchy.
Explanation: Remember, the men took the brunt of the war, and women stayed behind. It's going to be patriarchy because they're currently following tradition.
1. What were the name of the heights that were so important at the battle of Austerlitz?
Answer:
The Pratzen Heights I'm pretty sure