What did I do wrong? ​

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If M is the midpoint of AB, then AM = MB

Also AM+MB = AB

MB+MB = AB

2MB = AB

2MB = 6

MB = 6/2

MB = 3 cm

Also

If M is the midpoint of CD, then CN = DN and CN+DN = CD

CN+CN= CD

2CN = CD

2CN = 6

CN = 6/2

CN = 3 cm

Note that MN = MB + BC + CN

Substitute the given data

MN = 3cm + 6cm+3cm

MN = 12cm

Therefore the distance between M and N is 12cm

The distance between of the AM = BM = AB/2  is 3 cm, NC = ND = DC is 3 cm, MN = MB + DC + NC, and MN is 6.

Coordinate geometry is the study of geometry using the points in space. Using this, it is possible to find the distance between the points, the dividing line is m:n ratio, finding the mid-point of the line, etc.

The points A, B, C, and D are plotted on a line, consecutively. AB = BC = DC = 6 cm. Find the distance between M and N, which are the midpoints of segments AB and DC, respectively.

Then we know

[tex]\rm AM = MB \\\\NC = ND[/tex]

Then we have

[tex]\begin{aligned} \rm AM + MB &= \rm AB\\\\ \rm AM+AM &=6 \\\\ \rm AM &= 3 \end{aligned}[/tex]

Similarly, we have

[tex]\begin{aligned} \rm NC + ND &= \rm DC\\\\ \rm NC+NC &=6 \\\\ \rm NC &= 3 \end{aligned}[/tex]

NC = ND = 3 cm

AM = MB = 3 cm

1. AM = BM = AB/2 = 3 cm.

2. NC = ND = DC = 3 cm.

3. MN = MB + DC + NC.

4. MN = MB + DC + NC = 3 + 6 + 3 = 12 cm.

More about the coordinate geometry link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/1601567

Answer:

7⅓ cups of water

Step-by-step explanation:

Water-salt mixture ratio = ¾ cup of salt to 5½ cups of water (¾ : 5½)

To maintain this water to salt ratio, if you intend to use 1 cup of salt, the number of water you need to add can be calculated as follows:

¾ cup of salt : 5½ cups of water = 1 cup of salt : x cups of water

¾ : 5½ = 1 : x

[tex] \frac{\frac{3}{4}}{5\frac{1}{2}}. = \frac{1}{x} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{\frac{3}{4}}{\frac{11}{2}} = \frac{1}{x} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{3}{4}*{\frac{2}{11} = \frac{1}{x} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{3}{2}*{\frac{1}{11} = \frac{1}{x} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{3*1}{2*11} = \frac{1}{x} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{3}{22} = \frac{1}{x} [/tex]

Cross multiply

[tex] 3x = 22 [/tex]

Divide both sides by 3

[tex] \frac{3x}{3} = \frac{22}{3} [/tex]

[tex] x = 7\frac{1}{3} [/tex]

Number of cups of water to add to 1 cup if salt is 7⅓ cups.

√-72 = √(i^2) 9*8 = 3i√8 = 3i√2^3 = 3i*2√2 =6i√2

Answer is D. 6i√2

Answer:

this may be wrong but i think its p

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$136.

Step-by-step explanation:

Divide how much they made by the # of hours. 306/18=17. Multiply the amount per hour 17 by the 8 hours of work. 17x8=136.

Answer:

[tex]-(y+6)[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]-y-6\\\\=-(y+6)[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] - y - 6[/tex]

Common factor : -1

[tex] - 1(y + 6) = \\ - (y + 6)[/tex]

Answer:16

Step-by-step explanation:

265 / 10= 26.5 miles per gal.

424 miles / 26.5 mpg = 16 gallons

Let us see how we can solve this step by step each :

6417 ÷ 31 , we divide 64 by 31 and get the resulting quotient as 2 .

Then we bring down 1 . So , the number below is 21 , which cannot be divided by 31 .

So , we will have to bring down 7 for which we have to add a 0 to the quotient . Then the quotient will become 20 as of now .

As 217 is divisible by 3 , I put seven near 21 , making the quotient as 217 and get the remainder 0 .

Hence in the correct solution the correct quotient = 207 .

But the same thing has not been done in Xavier's solution as he has put a 0 after 7 instead of putting it before 7 . Hence , Xavier's mistake is that he put the 0 after 7 instead of putting it before 7 .

In Xavier's solution the quotient is = 270

Therefore , Xavier's mistake is that he put the 0 after 7 instead of putting it before 7 .

Answer: c.)2 g/ml is the correct answer.

Answer:

5+3

Step-by-step explanation:

5+3

Answer:

5+3=8

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

0

Step-by-step explanation:

on edge step functions assignment

The value of 8[1/4] is 0, the correct option is A.

Algebra is the study of abstract symbols, while logic is the manipulation of all those ideas.

The acronym PEMDAS stands for Parenthesis, Exponent, Multiplication, Division, Addition, and Subtraction. This approach is used to answer the problem correctly and completely.

We are given that;

The number= 8[1/4]

Now,

To evaluate 8[1/4], we need to use the definition of the square bracket notation. The square bracket notation means to round down to the nearest integer. For example, [3.7] = 3 and [-2.1] = -3.

So, 8[1/4] means to multiply 8 by the integer that is closest to 1/4 but less than or equal to it. The integer that is closest to 1/4 but less than or equal to it is 0. So, 8[1/4] = 8 * 0 = 0.

Therefore, by algebra the answer will be 0.

More about the Algebra link is given below.

brainly.com/question/953809

#SPJ1

Answer:

that equation isnt set up right

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

40+14=54 and 50 = 4 + 54

Complete Question

The complete question is shown on the first , second and third uploaded image

Answer:

A

 The correct option is A

B

  The correct option is H

Step-by-step explanation:

The null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o  :  \mu_1 - \mu_2 =  6[/tex]

The alternative  hypothesis is  [tex]H_a  :  \mu_1 - \mu_2 \ne  6[/tex]      

The population mean difference is  [tex]\mu_d  =  6[/tex]

Generally the sample size is  n =  15      

Generally the sample mean for input temperature is mathematically represented as

      [tex]\= x _1  = \frac{\sum x_i }{n}[/tex]

=>    [tex]\= x _1  = \frac{57.6 + 68.9 + \cdots +60.4  }{15}[/tex]  

=>    [tex]\= x _1  = 62.57 [/tex]  

Generally the sample mean for output temperature is mathematically represented as

      [tex]\= x _2  = \frac{\sum x_i }{n}[/tex]

=>    [tex]\= x _2  = \frac{65.1+ 74.4 + \cdots +67.3 }{15}[/tex]  

=>    [tex]\= x _2  = 55.97 [/tex]  

Generally the sample mean difference is mathematically represented as

   [tex]\= d = 62.57 - 55.97[/tex]

=>[tex]d = 6.6[/tex]

Generally the standard deviation is mathematically represented as

       [tex]s_d  =  \sqrt{\frac{ \sum [d_1 - \= d]^2}{n-1} }[/tex]

=>    [tex]s_d  =  \sqrt{\frac{ [ [57.6 -65.1]- 6.6]^2 +[68.9 -74.4]- 6.6]^2+\cdots +   [60.4 -67.3]- 6.6]^2}{15-1} }[/tex]

=>     [tex]s_d  = 1.732 [/tex]

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

      [tex]t =  \frac{6.6  - 6 }{\frac{1.732}{\sqrt{15} } }[/tex]

=>   [tex]t = 1.342 [/tex]

Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

    [tex]df  = n -  1[/tex]

So

      [tex]df  =  15  -  2[/tex]

=>    [tex]df  =  14[/tex]

Generally the p-value  is mathematically represented as

     [tex]p-value  = 2 *  P(t >  1.342 )[/tex]

Generally from the t -distribution table the probability of 1.342 at a degree of freedom of  [tex]df  =  28[/tex] is  

       [tex]P(t >  1.342 ) = 0.10047[/tex]

So

     [tex]p-value  = 2 * 0.10047[/tex]

=>   [tex]p-value  = 0.201[/tex]

Generally from the value  obtained we see that [tex]p-value  > \alpha[/tex] Hence

The  decision rule is  

Fail to  reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is

The cooling system changes the temperature of the water by 6 degrees

Answer: p=16

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

(a) An investigation of whether taking aspirin reduces one’s chance of having a heart attack.

Experimental

Neither blind nor double-blind (unless a placebo is being administered to some participants).

(b) An investigation of whether babies born into poor families (family income below $25,000) are more likely to weigh less than 5.5 pounds at birth than babies born into wealthy families (family income above $65,000).

Observational

There is no blinding issue here.

(c) An investigation of whether the size of the midsagittal plane of the anterior commissure (a part of the brain) of a man is related to the sexual orientation of the man.

Observational

There is no blinding issue here.

Step-by-step explanation:

An observational study happens where some variables are observed to determine their correlations.   On the other hand, in experimental studies, the researcher controls certain variables to determine causality.  Therefore, an experimental study provides evidence of cause and effect, like in (a) above.

Answer:

m=5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1:

9 = 2m + 2 - 3        Equation

Step 2:

9 = 2m - 1        Combine Like Terms

Step 3:

10 = 2m       Add 1 on both sides

Step 4:

m = 10 ÷ 2       Divide

Answer:

m = 5

Hope This Helps :)

Answer: 96%

1 square represent 1%

Answer:

96 present

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\frac{8}{5}[/tex]÷6[tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex]

First, simplify the 6[tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex] to an improper fraction, which is:

[tex]\frac{27}{4}[/tex]

Next rewrite the equation using the improper fraction:

[tex]\frac{8}{5}[/tex]÷[tex]\frac{27}{4}[/tex]

Now, in order to divide the fraction, we will need to flip the second fraction over, and then multiply the two fractions together. A great way to remember this is the phrase Copy Dot Flip - Copy the first fraction, put a dot for multiplication, and flip the second fraction.

[tex]\frac{8}{5}[/tex]·[tex]\frac{4}{27}[/tex]

Finally, multiply together and simplify/reduce if needed:

The final answer is [tex]\frac{32}{135}[/tex] and no simplification or reduction is needed

Answer:

The sequence is geometric

The common ratio is 0.5

Step-by-step explanation:

In the arithmetic sequence, there is a common difference between each two consecutive terms

In the geometric sequence, there is a common ratio between each two consecutive terms

Let us check the given sequence

∵ The first 3 terms are 12, 6, 3

∵ 6 - 12 = -6

∵ 3 - 6 = -3

∵ There is no common difference between the consecutive terms

∴ The sequence is not an arithmetic sequence

∵ 6 ÷ 12 = 0.5

∵ 3 ÷ 6 = 0.5

∴ There is a common ratio between each two consecutive terms

∴ The sequence is a geometric sequence

∴ The common ratio is 0.5

Given sequence is geometric sequence and common ratio between consecutive term is  [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] .

In Arithmetic sequence , common difference between consecutive terms should be equal.

In Geometric sequence, common ratio between consecutive terms should be equal.

Given sequence,     12, 6, 3, ...

  Since, common difference =  [tex]6-12\neq 3-6[/tex] , this is not arithmetic sequence.

Common ratio =     [tex]\frac{6}{12}=\frac{3}{6}=\frac{1}{2}[/tex]  Because common ratio is are equal. Thus, given sequence is geometric sequence.

Learn more about sequence here :

https://brainly.com/question/17648677

Answer:

Decision rule

Fail to reject the null  hypothesis

Conclusion

The sample evidence is not sufficient to conclude that more than three out of four financial institutions that offer online banking facilities are prone to fraud.

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

  The sample size is  n =  214

   The sample proportion is p = 0.78

   The level of significance is [tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex]

Generally the population proportion is mathematically represented as

      [tex]p = \frac{3}{4} =0.75[/tex] (gotten from the statement  ''three out of four'' in the question)

The null hypothesis is [tex]H_o : p = 0.75[/tex]

The alternative hypothesis [tex]H_a : p > 0.75[/tex]

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

     [tex]z = \frac{\^{p} - p}{ \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n} } }[/tex]

=>    [tex]z = \frac{0.78- 0.75}{ \sqrt{\frac{ 0.75(1-0.75)}{214} } }[/tex]

=>  [tex]z = 1.01[/tex]

Generally the p-value is mathematically represented as

    [tex]p-value  = P(Z > z )[/tex]

=> [tex]p-value  = P(Z > 1.01 )[/tex]

From the z-table  

    [tex]P(Z > 1.01 ) = 0.15625[/tex]

So

    [tex]p-value  = 0.15625 [/tex]

From the obtained values we see that [tex]p-value > \alpha[/tex] hence we fail to reject the null hypothesis

 Therefore we can conclude that the sample evidence is  not  sufficient to conclude that more than three out of four financial institutions that offer online banking facilities are prone to fraud.

Answer:

115 children

Step-by-step explanation:

Please see the attached picture for the full solution.

Answer:

D. The flow rate of the large tank is -20 gal/min, and the flow rate of the small tank is 20 gal/min.

Step-by-step explanation:

Flow rate = [tex]\frac{gallons of water}{minute}[/tex]

flow rate of water in the big tank = [tex]\frac{300}{5}[/tex]

                         = 60 gallons/minute

flow rate in the smaller tank = [tex]\frac{200}{5}[/tex]

                          = 40 gallons/minute

The difference in flow rate between the tanks = 60 - 40

                          = 20 gallons/minute

Since the two tanks have the same amount of water after the given time, then the volume of water in the large tank decrease; while the volume of water in the small tank increased.

Therefore, the flow rate of the large tank is -20 gal/min, and the flow rate of the small tank is 20 gal/min. This shows that option D is correct.

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

took the quiz

I think the the answer is 20

=$75.66 all in all and $67.99 dollars

Answer:

$22

Step-by-step explanation:

20 * 1.10 = 22