Answer:
action for cause occurring, which is limited to four years.
Todd leaves his bag with a BB gun in it in the locker room after game. Janitors find the gun when looking for ID in the bag. The next day, he is taken from class by police and a principal. He is interviewed and told he had to answer the questions. He was not told he could talk to his parents or a lawyer.
Amendment involved: Was it violated?: How?:
Answer:
it is violated
Explanation:
You have the right to remain silent and you have the right to a lawyer. by not giving todd his rights, they have commited an offense and he has the right to a retrial
Answer:
Yes it was
Explanation:
PLEASE HELP ME ASAPP
To be found guilty of breaking the law, a prosecutor must prove that the person committed the crime. Once this is proven, the guilty verdict is rendered by the court. OA. True СВ. False
This is true because the prosecutor must have evidence to show to the court that this person, or suspect, was someone who broke this law. Without proof, the court cannot accuse the suspect of a wrong doing. Hope this helped, but who knows, im just a 7th grader, lol
Bryce was charged with first degree murder. Through his attorney, he offers to plead guilty to manslaughter in exchange for a lesser sentence. What preconviction process is he engaging in
This would be an example of an "Alford Plea". An Alford Plea is not the same as a guilty plea, as it is used by those who claim innocence but plead guilty for a lesser sentence. This is one of the many issues with American Law, as we are forcing those who may not be guilty into accepting a guilty deal to lessen their time.
I hope this helps! :)
It is against the law to pass when your view of the road ahead is obstructed and when you are within _____ feet of a bridge, viaduct, or tunnel. 100 150 200 300
Answer:
It is against the law to pass when your view of the road ahead is obstructed and when you are within 100 feet of a bridge, viaduct, or tunnel.
I hope this helped at all.
Each of these statements about communist is true except
Answer:
5445=-tb
Explanation:
Reporters have a responsibility both to inform the public and to protect their sources. From an ethical standpoint what should Jordan do?
Answer:
I believe that Jordan shouldn't post the story despite the fact reporters have a responsibility to inform the public, people shouldn't be put in the spotlight if they don't want to be in the spotlight. There are hundreds of things that could go wrong. What if someone out there sees this story and goes after the family right after they became a victim.
A judge's order that releases an accused from jail without paying bond, with the understanding that he or she will return for further court proceedings is called
Answer:
A court's decision to allow a person charged with a crime to remain at liberty pending the trial, without having to post bail is recognizance release?
According to the data, which statement is true about Hispanic voters in 2020?
A majority of Hispanic voters of all ages favored Joe Biden over Donald Trump.
O A majority of male Hispanic voters favored Donald Trump over Joe Biden.
© Hispanic voters with college degrees were less likely to vote for Joe Biden than those without college degrees
O Hispanic women over 50 were more likely to vote for Donald Trump than those aged 18–49.
A. A majority of Hispanic voters of all ages favored Joe Biden over Donald Trump.
The findings indicate that a majority of Hispanic voters of all ages preferred Joe Biden to Donald Trump, which is the accurate assertion regarding the Hispanic voters in the 2020 election.
Looking at this map will help you find the solution to this query. Voters who support Joe Biden are referred to as "blue voters," whereas supporters of Donald Trump are referred to as "red voters."
Joe Biden was found to have a higher percentage of Hispanic voters than Trump in all areas.
Nationwide, Latino voters supported Democratic candidate Joseph R. Biden by extremely large proportions, similar to the margins obtained by Obama in 2008 and 2012.
Whereas in Georgia and Wisconsin, the distinction between winning and losing contender received between 12,000 and 21,000 votes from Latino voters, whose support for Biden was strong and their number of votes cast increased, helping the Democratic candidate win the state.
Learn more about Hispanic voters here
https://brainly.com/question/25098596
# SPJ 2
In a medical malpractice case, an individual alleges that he or she has been injured by another’s negligence or malfeasance. Medical malpractice cases such as this one involve which kind of law
Answer:
Tort
Explanation:
mendel’s laws of segregation and independent assortment are based on the movement of chromosomes during meiosis, even though mendel did not know about chromosomes during his lifetime. can you match each of the following events with the law it illustrates?
According to Mendel, the law of segregation posits that an individual has two alleles and a parent typically passes only one allele to the offspring.
Your information is incomplete. Therefore, an overview of the law of segregation and independent assortment will be given. Mendel's Law of Independent Assortment implies that the inheritance of one gene is independent of the inheritance of the other pair.
It should be noted that the law of segregation and independent assortment are vital during meiotic division. Mendel's law of segregation simply entails how homologous chromosomes are separated in meiosis.
Learn more about laws of segregation on:
https://brainly.com/question/25783034
PLEASE HELP ME ASAP
Andre is found murdered in the office of his construction company. His father began the company when Andre was a boy and several of Andre's brothers and cousins work for the company. After a lengthy investigation, detectives uncover evidence that Andre's brother James shot Andre in order to take his place as the manager of the company. Since the perpetrator was a member of Andre's family, what type of homicide would this be classified as? A. friendly homicide B. primary homicide OC. close homicide OD. secondary homicide
Answer:
primary homicide
Explanation:
instrumental crimes that involve premeditation and are less likely to be victim precipitated. False, primary homicides are expressive crimes that result from acts of interpersonal hostility. Who is involved in non primary homicides? Strangers, no prior relationship between victims and offenders
Since the perpetrator was a member of Andre's family, it is a type of primary homicide. The appropriate response is option B.
What is homicide?Homicide, or the killing of one person by another, The term "homicide" refers to both criminal and noncriminal killings, including murder, manslaughter, and various forms of homicide.
First-degree murder in the United States is defined as a homicide committed with intent or as part of a major offense (e.g., kidnapping). Less severe degrees of intent are required for second- and third-degree murder.
Noncriminal homicides include murders carried out in self- or other-defense as well as fatalities brought on by accidents caused by people acting lawfully.
Primary homicides are expressive crimes that are the outcome of hostile activities committed against other people. Who is responsible for secondary homicides? There is no history of acquaintance between the victims and the culprits.
Hence, the appropriate response is option B.
To learn more about homicide
https://brainly.com/question/28177539
#SPJ5
Does the method a profiler uses to create their profile matter? Why or why not?
Answer:
This would be called Offender profiling.
Offender profiling, also known as criminal profiling, is an investigative strategy used by law enforcement agencies to identify likely suspects and has been used by investigators to link cases that may have been committed by the same person.
Explanation:
HELPPPPP!!!!!!!
Blake offers to sell to Poe a copy of Lord Byron’s first edition of poetry for $22,000 and specifies the acceptance has to be in writing, accompanied by a check for the required amount, and delivered by certified mail. Poe follows the offer’s instructions exactly and mails the certified letter at 3 p.m. on April 1. However, at 9 a.m. on April 1, Blake accepted an offer of $30,000 for the edition. He then mailed a revocation of his offer to Poe at 1 p.m. the same day. The revocation arrived at Poe’s address at noon on April 2. Which contract will be upheld by the courts? Provide a CLEAR answer to the question.
Answer:
q
Explanation:
since blake has 50 dollars and get 30,00 dollar each month what he should do is buy 1 dollar food at dollar store to be able to survive and not waste that much moeny unitil he gets is 30,000 dollars again
keeping criminals away from society, describes which purpose of punishment?
Answer:
The awnser is containment.
Explanation:
when may you be subject to criminal disciplinary and/or administrative
Answer:
Under which circumstances may you be subject to criminal, disciplinary, and/or administrative action due to online misconduct? Any time you participate in or condone misconduct, whether offline or online.
Explanation:
Mark me brainly please
Any time when you are involved or participate in or condone misconduct, either online or offline mode subject to criminal disciplinary and/or administrative.
What is a criminal?A criminal is a person who breaks the law by an overact, omission, or neglect that may result in punishment.
when you are involved or participate in the misconduct either offline or online mode, it will be subject to criminal disciplinary and/or administrative.
Learn more about Criminal here:
https://brainly.com/question/23059652
#SPJ2
A type of pretrial release in which a defendant promises to meet certain stated conditions is known as:
Answer:
The answer is Condition Release
which type of government provides the best protection of individual rights?
Answer: i think Democracy
Explanation:
Without going into the specifics of the charge, the defendant was found guilty of violating an obscure state law in a county court. Since the law was enacted a century ago, not a single person has been charged with violating it in the state. As a result, this case was essentially new territory for state prosecutors and the presiding county court judge. The case is being appealed. The defense attorney is confident that the verdict will be overturned based on a failure of what they perceive as the judge not abiding by precedent. This claimed precedent refers to a recent highly publicized case in another state that involved a similar law. As a noted legal scholar, the state judiciary has called you in to assess the validity of the appeal. When asked for your preliminary thoughts by a senior state prosecutor, specifically if you believe the judge failed to follow precedent in offering his opinion, how do you respond
In the situation described and following the definition and common use cases of precedent, I would confirm that it is my opinion that the judge in question did in fact fail to follow precedent.
Precedent is described as a past event and/or action which is used as a guide when considering the course of action for a similar situation. Given the keyword "similar" in this definition, it can be argued that in order for precedent to apply to a situation, it is not necessary for the details of each situation to be identical.
Therefore, the defense attorney can argue the failure to follow precedent based solely on the similarly obscure nature of each law. Furthermore, if the defense attorney is able to procure evidence of past infractions of this law for which no charges were upheld, it would almost certainly result in the appeal being granted and the subsequent review of the law in question.
To learn more visit:
https://brainly.com/question/885855?referrer=searchResults
PLEASE HELP ME ASAPP
Carson is called to the scene of a murder. He brings his kit with him and begins to dust the area for fingerprints. Then he carefully puts a clear, special tape over possible prints to lift them off the surface. Carson puts the prints in his evidence bag to scan into the computer at the lab. What title would MOST likely describe Carson's profession? OA. criminologist B. criminalist C. criminal justice professional CD. jurist
Answer:
criminalist
Explanation:
Forensic science, also known as criminalistics, is the application of science to criminal and civil laws, mainly—on the criminal side—during criminal investigation, as governed by the legal standards of admissible evidence and criminal procedure.
The title that would doubtlessly depict Carson's profession is criminalist.Therefore, choice (B) is exact response.
A criminalist is a legal researcher who spends significant time in gathering, examining, and deciphering actual proof connected with criminal examinations. For this situation, Carson's activities of tidying for fingerprints, utilizing exceptional tape to lift the prints, and safeguarding the proof in a proof sack for additional examination demonstrate that he is associated with criminological examinations.
Criminalists assume a significant part in crime location examination, looking at proof to assist with recognizing suspects and add to settling criminal cases. They frequently work in legal research centers and team up with policing to offer logical help in criminal examinations.
Accordingly, choice (B) is exact response.
Learn more about criminalist, from:
brainly.com/question/31030668
#SPJ3
What rationale upheld by SCOTUS supports subjecting individuals charged with a crime but not yet found guilty to strip searches while awaiting trial in jail
Answer:
Explanation:
Not or guilty
The United States Supreme Court can overrule a decision made by a state's highest appellate court only when an issue of _____ is involved.
Answer:
The United States Supreme Court can overrule a decision made by a state's highest appellate court only when an issue of constitutional procedure is involved.
I hope this helped at all.
Betsy Borden is accused of murdering her father. In her defense, she calls her minister as a character witness. He testifies to her peaceable and nonviolent reputation. She also testifies in her own behalf to an alibi defense. The prosecution has evidence that within the past five years Borden was convicted of Disturbing the peace, a misdemeanor punishable by six months in jail. The conviction arose from an incident in which Borden disrupted a restaurant by throwing her meal at the server. Should the prosecution be allowed to make use of the prior convictions in any way at trial
Answer:
I don't believe the prosecution should use the prior conviction in trial other than to provide a background. Since she was already convicted of the crime it can't be used against her anyways.
Explanation:
A person who believes a judge has behaved unethically while presiding over the case should file a complaint with which entity
Answer:
He shouldnt file a complaint
Explanation:
he shouldnt file a complaint because he wants the judge to go in hid favor and he needs to be nice to the judge
Amerimed is negotiating a deal with Mountain Medical (MM) for the sale of Amerimed's latest health supplement. Amerimed would like to package its supplements in bottles produced by Rick, but Rick says he will not enter into a contract with Amerimed until the MM contract is finalized. MM has sent Amerimed a letter of intent, but Rick thinks it is too vague and refuses to enter into an agreement with Amerimed. What should Amerimed do?
In this scenario, Amerimed should send Mountain Medical (MM) its own letter of intent, stating that they do have a binding agreement.
What is a contract?
A contract can be defined as a legally binding and enforceable agreement between two (2) or more parties (business associates), which gives rise to a mutual and legal obligation for the parties involved to do business together.
What is a letter of intent?
A letter of intent can be defined as a formal document that outlines the understanding between two (2) or more parties (business associates) while explicitly stating (declaring) the intentions of the writer with respect to formalizing a legally binding agreement (contract).
In this scenario, a business deal is being negotiated between three (3) parties:
AmerimedMountain Medical (MM)RickSince Mountain Medical (MM) has sent Amerimed a letter of intent, it is necessary that Amerimed acknowledges the letter and respond with its own letter of intent, wherein, it would be stated that there is a legally binding agreement between, regardless of what Rick thinks or his subsequent actions.
In conclusion, Amerimed should send Mountain Medical (MM) its own letter of intent, stating that they do have a binding agreement.
Read more on contracts here: https://brainly.com/question/17185606
at what point can the defense move to end the case to end the case and for what cause?
Answer:
The majority of criminal cases terminate when a criminal defendant accepts a plea bargain offered by the prosecution. In a plea bargain, the defendant chooses to plead guilty before trial to the charged offenses, or to lesser charges in exchange for a more lenient sentence or the dismissal of related charges.
PLEASE HELP ME ASAP
Who MOST likely carried out the Gardner Museum heist, in which $500 million in art was stolen and none has been recovered? OA. habitual thieves B. professional thieves C. persistent thieves d D. occasional offenders
Answer:
B. Professional thieves
Answer:
professional thieves
Explanation:
The "professional thief" is a highly specialized predatory offender with a history that dates back to Elizabethan England. Although this type of criminal is generally associated with narcotic addiction, his drug-taking typically involved the use of heroin, morphine, and cocaine on an intermittent basis.
Also, I took the quiz :)
Brainliest! Please help
Answer:
Offender
Explanation:
D is not in our businesses .
C includes victim which denotes to the payer of crime.
B denotes to witness which means knower of crime.
Offender in A means to do crime Option A is correctQuick Help
5. Rick is about to stand trial, but he does not know what the charges are against him. _________________________________________________
6. Negan has been held in jail for three years without a trial. _________________________________________________
7. Keisha committed a crime in New York, but the punishment for the crime is harsher in Georgia, so the prosecutor organizes her case to be transferred to Georgia. _________________________________________________
8. Tyrell has selected a series of witnesses to examine which will attest to his client’s innocence. _________________________________________________
9. Though new evidence was found to convict Phillip after he was tried and found innocent, the prosecutor did not pursue a new trial. _________________________________________________
10. Sam cannot afford a lawyer, but the state appoints him one. _______________
Answer:
5. He can claim his miranda rights (the 5th amendment allows people to know what they are on trial for)
6. This is a violation of habeus corpus. Habeus corpus demands that a criminal be put on trial before being detained for actions. (Innocent until proven guilty)
7. 6th amendment protects the right to a speedy and public trial in the district in which the crime has been committed
8. 6th Amendment declares that all trials will have an impartial jury
9. Double Jeopardy in the 5th Amendment (can't be tried for the same thing twice)
10. 6th Amendment provides a lawyer for anyone who cannot provide one.
Explanation:
Safety belts usually consist of a lap belt and __________
Answer:
a shoulder belt
Explanation:
PLEASE HELP ME ASAP
Ever since he was young, Kai was fascinated with fires. He loved to play with matches, eventually using kerosene or gasoline to create bigger fires. When Kai visits the library, all he can think about is how quickly the paper would go up in flames. He waits until it is after hours and throws a wadded-up cloth soaked with kerosene through one of the windows. Kai watches from the shadows as the building quickly goes up in flames. Firefighters arrive on the scene to put out the fire. Kai continues to watch as an ambulance pulls up and wonders if one of the firefighters has gotten a little to close to his flames. As Kai watches, firefighters bring out a body on a stretcher. Evidently someone was inside the library when the fire erupted and did not survive. When investigators track down Kai for starting the fire, what charge besides arson will he MOST likely face? OA. aggravated assault OB. first-degree murder C. second-degree murder OD. manslaughter
Answer:
The answer is D.
Explanation:
Manslaughter
Manslaughter is the charge besides arson will he most likely face. Hence, option D is correct.
What is meant by Manslaughter?Homicide is a broad category of crimes that includes manslaughter and murder. Manslaughter can be committed in three different ways: by killing with the intent to kill but where there is a partial defence, like loss of control; by assuming less responsibility; or by killing in accordance with a pact.
Those found guilty of murder must receive a life sentence from the court. Manslaughter carries no mandatory sentence, and the following are examples of possible punishments under UK law: a jail term of between two and ten years.
If parole is granted, a person serving a life sentence will spend the rest of their time under the PBC's supervision.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more information about Manslaughter, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/6228473
#SPJ2