This is not a Question
I know a lot of you when you go ask a question you are wanting answers. But if you see LINKS do NOT CLICK ON THEM! I have had friends who have click on some and it is not good. Some may look like the following:

Answer:

social discrimination and hatred between individuals of different complexion

Answer:

False hope this helps pls mark brainliest

Answer:

false

Explanation:

have a nice day haha

Answer:

D

Explanation:

police wouldn't bother seeing an innocent sober person but when they see someone drunk and intoxicated they would try help or assist (if the intoxicated person gets hostile then they will arrest them) if that makes sense

Answer:

Although defined within the context of a media defendant, the rule requiring proof of actual malice applies to all defendants including individuals. The standard can make it very difficult to prevail in a defamation case, even when allegations made against a public figure are unfair or are proved to be false.

Explanation:

Answer:

d

Explanation:

Answer:

A confession can serve as powerful evidence of a suspect's guilt, but criminal defendants have a constitutional right against self-incrimination. An involuntary confession that was coerced by a police officer cannot be used against a defendant in court, regardless of whether it was true.

Explanation:

You can put it in your own words if you want. Hope this helps!

Answer:

D) the right to vote

Out of these options the answer that is a right protected through procedural due process is the right to Jury. The answer to this question is option B.

The procedural process refers to the process that the government of the United States has to follow before they can deprive a citizen of several of his rights.

The due process that has to be followed has to do with the right to the establishment of the jury.

The judge would have to carry out the sentencing only after the jury have established their facts.

Read more on https://brainly.com/question/15242689?referrer=searchResults

\ (•◡•) / Hey There!

Answer → Providing Fire Protection

 *:･ﾟ✧*:･ﾟ✧ Hope This Helps!  *:･ﾟ✧*:･ﾟ✧

Answer: The president has the power to nominate ambassadors and appointments are made with the advice and consent of the Senate. The State Department formulates and implements the president's foreign policy. Country Reports on Human Rights Practices are submitted each year to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.

Explanation: here UwU

Answer:

I'm pretty sure its true

Explanation:

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Constitutional law is a body of law which defines the role, powers, and structure of different entities within a state, namely, the executive, the parliament or legislature, and the judiciary; as well as the basic rights of citizens and, in federal countries such as the United States and Canada, the relationship between the central government and state, provincial, or territorial governments.

I hope this helps!

Answer:

The Court's jurisdiction is broad, covering almost all civil matters arising under Australian federal law and some summary and indictable criminal matters. Central to the Court's civil jurisdiction is s 39B(1A)c of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth).This jurisdiction includes cases created by a federal statute, and extends to matters in which a federal issue is properly raised as part of a claim or of a defence and to matters where the subject matter in dispute owes its existence to a federal statute.

The Court has jurisdiction under the Judiciary Act to hear applications for judicial review of decisions by officers of the Commonwealth. Many cases also arise under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (ADJR Act) which provides for judicial review of most administrative decisions made under Commonwealth enactments on grounds relating to the legality, rather than the merits, of the decision. The Court also hears appeals on questions of law from the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. This jurisdiction falls under the Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights National Practice Area (NPA) which also includes complaints about unlawful discrimination no longer being dealt with by the Australian Human Rights Commission and matters concerning the Australian Constitution.

The Court hears taxation matters on appeal from the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. It also exercises a first instance jurisdiction to hear objections to decisions made by the Commissioner of Taxation.

The Court shares first instance jurisdiction with the Supreme Courts of the states and territories in the complex area of intellectual property (copyright, patents, trademarks, designs and circuit layouts). All appeals in these cases, including appeals from the Supreme Courts, are to a full Federal Court.

Jurisdiction

residence;

cause of action;

the place where the dispute arose;

the quantum and nature of the claim;

consent;

location of the property; and.

other factors.

please give me brainliest.

Answer:

NAO TENHO SERTESA SE ESTA SERTO

Explanation:

Segundo o entendimento da Suprema Corte, qualquer tratado internacional que seja, desde que ratificado pelo Brasil, passa a fazer parte do nosso direito interno, no âmbito da legislação ordinária. Esta, como é sabido, não tem força nenhuma para mudar o texto constitucional.

Answer:

a

Explanation:

Answer:

Consumption

Explanation:

People whose wants are satisfied by using goods and services/using goods and services.

The first duty of the first responder is to begin collecting evidence. The statement is False.

Evidence is referred to as proof based on factual information which helps to validate the occurrence of the event. it helps to determine whether the action took place or not by providing credentials.

Safeguarding the general public, establishing control over modifications made to the scene of the crime, and protecting the crime scene itself are the first responder's primary responsibilities.

Upon responding at a crime scene, first responders are typically police officers, Emergency medical technicians, and firefighters. Help and support should be given in order to prevent any serious medical problems brought on by the crimes at the crime scene.

Therefore, the statement is False.

Learn more about Evidence, here:

https://brainly.com/question/14370298

#SPJ2

Answer:

The king set up these prisons far away so that the citizens would be out of harm's way

Explanation:

Answer:

6 Years

Explanation:

This is called sexenio, The Mexican constitutional follows primarily on a Presidential Term, and can only server ONE term.

Answer:

No independent judiciary. The Articles of Confederation offered no system of courts in the jurisdiction of the national government. This meant that the entire judiciary branch was dependent on the states.

Explanation: hope it helped

Answer:

[tex]\huge \mathbb{ \pink {★᭄ꦿ᭄A} \green{N}\purple{S} \red {W} \orange{E} \pink{R}\pink{࿐}}[/tex]

Explanation:

Answer. The difference in hights of the objects will remain same with time as both the objects have been dropped from rest and are falling with same acceleration i.e., (acceleration due to gravity).

✶⊶⊷⊶⊷❍ ❥ ❍⊶⊷⊶⊷✶

Hope you understand

✶⊶⊷⊶⊷❍ ❥ ❍⊶⊷⊶⊷✶

Answer:

8th amendment

Explanation:

Protection against cruel and unusual punishments  

Answer:

Because they represent you state in the senate

Explanation:

They are like people that have the same believes as their state

Answer:

True, the Chief Justice delivered the verdict of a  5-4 majority, stating that the  defendant's interrogation violated his Fifth Amendment Right..

Explanation:

Chief Justice Earl Owen wrote about Miranda’s case for the supreme court. The statement is True.

The Supreme Court is the highest judiciary body in the country which evaluates whether the laws are practiced properly or not. It helps to check the activities that are unconstitutional in the country and take strict actions against them.

The United States Supreme Court held in the landmark decision of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) that police must tell individuals of their constitutional rights prior to questioning them while they are in custody.

Ernesto Miranda was taken into custody and brought in for interrogation in relation to a  kidnapping case in this case. Miranda was not made aware of his access to an attorney or his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent.

Learn more about the supreme court, here:

https://brainly.com/question/10739091

#SPJ2

Answer: false

Explanation: