Answer:
50% of traffic deaths happen at night
50% of road fatalities occur at night, and the death rate from collisions increased across all driving zones.
What is death?
The whole-brain standard states that human death is the permanent end of all brain functions, including those of the brain stem.
50% of road fatalities occur at night, despite the fact that we only drive 25% of the time then. Driving at night is always riskier, regardless of whether the route is well-known or not.
Hence, the significance of the death is aforementioned.
Learn more about the death, here:
https://brainly.com/question/26067728
#SPJ2
June
1. Atom Company just began business and made the following four inventory purchases in June:
1
150 units
$ 825
June 10
200 units
1,120
June 15
200 units
1,140
June 28
150 units
885
$3.970
A physical count of merchandise inventory on June 30 reveals that there are 200 units on
hand. Using the LIFO inventory method, the value of the ending inventory on June 30 is
a. $1,105.
b. $1,100.
c. $1,170.
d. $1,180.
LIFO stands for Last in First out, essentially stating that the most recent products produced or purchased are the first to be sold or expensed. So lets list the quantity, dates, and prices in an ordered fashion.
June 1: 150 units $825
June 10: 200 units $1,120
June 15: 200 units $1,140
June 28: 150 units $885
Total: $3,970
What we know from the question is that only 200 units arrived. This plus the fact that we know we must use the LIFO method means that only the first 200 units arrived. So we get rid of every other unit cost in order to find ending inventory. So, lets find what's left.
150 units from June 1st: $825
50 units from June 10th: $1,120 / 200 = $5.6 per unit * 50 units = $280
$825 + $280 = $1,105
This means that the answer is going to be A - $1,105.
I hope I've helped! :)
If a court finds a contract to be unconscionable, it: None of these answers. Can remove the unconscionable clause but may not refuse to enforce the contract. Can amend the unconscionable clause but may not remove it completely. Can refuse to enforce the contract but cannot amend it.
Answer:
If a court finds a contract to be unconscionable, they can amend the unconscionable clause, but may not remove it completely.
I hope this helped at all.
If I were to add alcohol to the education system what problems would I CREATE? Meaning what problems would I create if I taught kids about alcohol in school as a module?
A lot of people don't understand this question.
Answer:
reducing the number of hours committed to studying
Explanation:
hope it helps
[tex] \: \: \: \: [/tex]
you can bring alcohol in school of it's your project or if your using it on science
Alcohol use could also affect performance by reducing the number of hours committed to studying, completing homework assignments, and attending school. ... Both studies found that drinking had a direct negative effect on GPA and an indirect negative effect through reduced study hours.hope it helps[tex] \: \: \: \: \: [/tex]
Differential Treatment
<
In your opinion, what can be done to limit or eliminate differential
treatment when it comes to the courts?
Directions: Please find, research, and summarize a current event that took place in the last 1 year. After picking a topic, research the current even thoroughly and summarize the event in 4-5 sentences. Think about and include the cause, effect, and significance of the event in your summary. Your summary must be in complete and detailed sentences.
Example of topics: Increase of Wildfires, Capitol Riot, Extreme Drought, etc.
Please use the following links to help you research current events:
1) www.npr.org
2) www.libraryofcongress.gov
3) NYTimes.com
What are 10 issues discussed in Article 1 of the Constitution?
Is anyone able to list 10 plz help me. Thank you
What factors may have contributed to the training and overall subculture of the police force in question?
Answer: In most cases, police officers are influenced by formal organizational struc- tures and expressed organizational values and also by informal values, beliefs, norms, rituals, and expectations of other police officers that are passed along through the orga- nizational culture (Adcox, 2000, p. 20).
Explanation:
1. What is disease?
Answer:
any problem come by microorganisms
Answer:
hope that may help you
Explanation:
disease, any harmful deviation from the normal structural or functional state of an organism, generally associated with certain signs and symptoms and differing in nature from physical injury. A diseased organism commonly exhibits signs or symptoms indicative of its abnormal state.
An example of a disease is cancer
human disease, an impairment of the normal state of a human being that interrupts or modifies its vital functions
the types of diseaseThere are four main types of disease: infectious diseases, deficiency diseases, hereditary diseases (including both genetic diseases and non-genetic hereditary diseases), and physiological diseases. Diseases can also be classified in other ways, such as communicable versus non-communicable diseases.
why Miranda is considered one of the most important cases in the history of our legal system
Answer:
In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.
Explanation:
what are seven reasons police officers are allowed to exercise discretion in the day to do work?
Answer:
the law should be flexible in some ways in order to ensure that the spirit of the law is satisfied
whether to draw his weapon. whether to make an arrest. whether to issue a traffic ticket or other violation
Explanation:
if a mind reader reads another mindreaders mind whose mind are they reading
Answer:
Each other's minds(?)
But, perhaps, the second mindreader is not reading the first mindreader's mind, so, the first mindreader is reading the second mindreader's mind.That made no sense.I hope this helped at all.
orange zest or star frost? PLEASE HELP I NEED IT
Answer:
Starfrost
Explanation:
<3
Answer:
Orange Zest
Explanation:
<3 ( ' o ')
In the dual court system, the three basic tiers include trial courts, ________, and supreme courts.g
Answer:
intermediate appellate courts
Help me plss can someone answer these, Thank You!
Answer:
Answers Below.
Explanation:
1. True
2. False
3. True
4. True
5. True
6. False
7. True
8. True
9. True
10. True
Most of these are true lol XD
the house agreed to the compromise as soon as the senate approved it
Answer:
July 16, 1987, began with a light breeze, a cloudless sky, and a spirit of celebration. On that day, 200 senators and representatives boarded a special train for a journey to Philadelphia to celebrate a singular congressional anniversary.
Exactly 200 years earlier, the framers of the U.S. Constitution, meeting at Independence Hall, had reached a supremely important agreement. Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) provided a dual system of congressional representation. In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population. In the Senate, all states would have the same number of seats. Today, we take this arrangement for granted; in the wilting-hot summer of 1787, it was a new idea.
In the weeks before July 16, 1787, the framers had made several important decisions about the Senate’s structure. They turned aside a proposal to have the House of Representatives elect senators from lists submitted by the individual state legislatures and agreed that those legislatures should elect their own senators.
By July 16, the convention had already set the minimum age for senators at 30 and the term length at six years, as opposed to 25 for House members, with two-year terms. James Madison explained that these distinctions, based on “the nature of the senatorial trust, which requires greater extent of information and stability of character,” would allow the Senate “to proceed with more coolness, with more system, and with more wisdom than the popular[ly elected] branch.”
The issue of representation, however, threatened to destroy the seven-week-old convention. Delegates from the large states believed that because their states contributed proportionally more to the nation’s financial and defensive resources, they should enjoy proportionally greater representation in the Senate as well as in the House. Small-state delegates demanded, with comparable intensity, that all states be equally represented in both houses. When Sherman proposed the compromise, Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate in all matters—except those involving money.
Over the Fourth of July holiday, delegates worked out a compromise plan that sidetracked Franklin’s proposal. On July 16, the convention adopted the Great Compromise by a heart-stopping margin of one vote. As the 1987 celebrants duly noted, without that vote, there would likely have been no Constitution.
Explanation:
~L~
Eric is a Missouri resident and a sentenced offender. He was sentenced to three years of probation with the following conditions:
1. He must not violate any law of any state or any local ordinance.
2. He must report to Probation Officer Greg James monthly at a predetermined time.
3. He must not use any illegal substance or alcohol and must also submit to random testing.
4. He must obtain permission from Probation Officer James before traveling out of Missouri.
In his second year of probation, Eric was captured by store detectives stealing a satellite radio system from an electronics store in Orlando, Florida. The Orlando Police Department responded to the scene and investigated. After interviewing the store detectives, they issued Eric a misdemeanor appearance citation for shoplifting. The appearance citation contained a mandatory court date for the following month.
Approximately three months later, Probation Officer James received a letter from the local district court in Orlando, Florida. The letter informed James that probationer Eric was in Orlando in January, received a misdemeanor violation for shoplifting, and has since failed to report for the scheduled court date; a warrant has now been issued by the Orlando District Court. James reviewed probationer Eric’s file and found no record of any request to leave the state for any type of travel. Eric’s home address is listed as Springfield, Missouri.
Probation Officer James prepared all of the paperwork required to initiate probation revocation proceedings against Eric. James also sent Eric written notice that the terms of his probation had been breached and that his probation had been placed in jeopardy. The notice informed Eric that a hearing had been set for the probation revocation. During the hearing, Eric will have an opportunity to present evidence on his own behalf.
On the date of the hearing, Eric and James arrived at the courthouse to present their arguments before the presiding judge. During the hearing, Probation Officer James presented evidence supporting the alleged breach of the conditions of probation. He presented sworn statements from Orlando store detectives regarding the shoplifting incident and sworn statements from the Orlando police officer who issued Eric the misdemeanor appearance citation. Eric responded to the allegations by testifying that the Orlando misdemeanor case was a case of mistaken identity and that he was at home in Missouri during that time. James rebutted Eric’s testimony by restating that his witnesses (through their sworn statements) could attest to the fact that Eric was in fact arrested in Orlando for shoplifting the satellite radio system on the date in question. At the close of all testimony, the judge sent the courtroom into a fifteen-minute recess so that he could review all of the testimony and reread the sworn statements from the absent witnesses.
Approximately fifteen minutes later, the judge returned to the bench and announced his decision that Eric had violated the conditions of his probation agreement and should now be sent back to prison to serve out the remainder of the original sentence. The judge added that Eric will face the shoplifting charges upon release from prison. The court then served Eric with a written order stating all of the reasons for the probation revocation.
Can Probation Eric be prosecuted for shoplifting after release from prison, or would that constitute double jeopardy?
Answer:
Yes, he can be prosecuted.
Explanation:
It would not be considered Double jeopardy, since what he was being prosecuted for was something completely different. It was for shoplifting. Also, he violated the conditions for his probation, he violated the law of the state when he shoplifted.
Operating under the “color of law” refers to _____.
the requirement that jails treat incarcerated individuals equally the person bringing
a legal action against a defendant
the legal authority that some persons have over citizens
the use of police force against a person of color
Answer:
The legal authority that some persons have over citizens.
Explanation:
To act "under color of state law" means to act beyond the bounds of lawful authority, but in such a manner that the unlawful acts were done while the official was purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his official duties.
A
is a one-on-one identification procedure. The suspect is brought to a witness so the witness can confirm
B:
identity.
IP
A
Lineup
8
B Showup
C Pretrial examination
D
Bringup
Under the 1 -1 identification procedure, the suspect is brought to a witness so the witness can confirm the witness identity.
The 1 -1 identification procedure is a procedure used by the police to test the ability of witnesses to identify a person they have seen on a previous occasion.
Hence, under this procedure, the suspect is brought to a witness so the witness can confirm the witness identity.Therefore, the Option A. is correct.
Read more about 1 -1 identification procedure:
brainly.com/question/17939627
What do you think is the most important goal of the criminal justice system? Why?
Answer:
The main purpose of the Criminal Justice System is to provide justice to every citizen of its nation and protecting the innocent by finding and punishing those proved to be guilty and also helping them to stop repeating crimes. It keep people aware of the crimes and protects the right the citizens. Criminal justice system ensures that justice will be provide to all irrespective of anything.
Explanation:
what are the factors of 108 and 999
[tex]70 \time 80 + [/tex]
2. What other things need to happen in order for a new
correctional paradigm to be transformed and
embraced?
Answer:
Deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation are all arguments that look to the consequences of punishment.
Explanation:
Should questions of social policy be left to Parliament rather than being decided by the court?
Answer:
No,
Explanation:
They must be repeatedly be checked in Court because if they don't the government / parliament can misuse the power.
The color of law means that police officers are immune from prosecution when conducting their jobs. In what circumstances can a police officers be charged with a crime for conducting his or her job? (Select all that apply.)
failure to warrant
failure to intervene
custodial interrogation
malicious prosecution
Answer:
A B D
Explanation:
Isabelle found shell casings at the secondary crime scene. What type of evidence does this BEST represent?
Answer:
A weapon was used at the scene
Which law gives an organization more instruction and insight into the type of information security plans/policies required
Information security policy (ISP) is the law that gives organizations and companies insight into the type of plans and policies required for information security. They go over data leakage, data breaches, snooping, and control to information.
I hope this helps! :)
Often times, ___
killed in alcohol-related crashes.
A. no one is
B. only the guilty party is
C. passengers
Answer:
I think it's C.passengers
Often times, passengers killed in alcohol-related crashes. Thus, option (c) is correct.
What is passenger?A passenger is a person who travels in a vehicle but has no responsibility for the chores required for that vehicle to arrive at its destination or to run the vehicle in any other way. A passenger is not a steward. A passenger is someone who travels in a transportation such as a bus, boat, or plane but is not operating it or working on it.
Young people, according to statistics, are the most vulnerable to intoxicated driving. Passengers are frequently killed in alcohol-related accidents. Other typical injuries caused by alcohol drinking include falls and fire burns. Falls, in particular, are the greatest cause of fatal and non - fatal injury in the United States. As inebriated over the legal limit, the probability of falling increases 60-fold when compared to a sober individual.
As a result, the often times, passengers killed in alcohol-related crashes. Therefore, option (c) is correct.
Learn more about on passengers, here:
https://brainly.com/question/199361
#SPJ2
Charles wants to invest his money in something that earns money steadily
with little risk. Which should he invest in?
O A. Government bonds
O B. Stocks
O C. Mutual funds
D. Hedge funds
Answer:
Government bonds............
Answer:
O A. Government bonds
Explanation:
Fires that occur as result of human action or inaction but without malicious intent are classified as:
Select one:
A. unintentional.
B. natural.
C. accidental.
D. negligent.
Answer:
C. accidental.............
Differences between Universal Citizenship and Global Citizenship
Answer:
The universal citizenship is provided to the citizens of a nation in all the country in which he is being present at the time of need universally. The global citizenship is provided to every citizen by any nation in which he is being present at the time of need globally on the basis of being a human.
Answer by : https://brainly.in/question/7556579
Explanation:
Deidre McFadden came to the offices of Webber & Associates seeking help in organizing her business, Fashion Angels, a toy-making enterprise focusing on dolls with multiple outfits. She wants to run the business and has few personal assets so is not worried about personal liability. Deidre’s aunt, Penelope, is elderly, wealthy, and adores her only niece. Penelope is willing to invest $500,000 to start the business, and Deidre has $10,000 to contribute on her own. Deidre expects to do all the work without compensation as it will take at least a year before Fashion Angels will make any profit. Penelope will sign any agreement terms, with one condition. Penelope is insisting that Deidre cannot leave the company, stating “I don’t want my money going to a stranger, it’s for Deidre.”
Deidre is looking for your advice as to the type of entity that would suit her best. “I don’t want my aunt to become the target for bill collectors if I fail. And to be honest, I really don’t want her interfering in the business because she can be quite aggressive.”
What advice would you give Deidre?
Considering the situation described above, the best advice to be given to Deidre is to establish a Sole Proprietorship.
As a Sole Proprietorship, she would be the alpha and omega of the business, thereby avoiding the interference of her aunt, Penelope.
Also, as a Sole Proprietor, should the business fail, she would be the only one responsible for the liability when the bill collectors come, thereby freeing her aunt from any indebtedness.
Again, given that Deidre is not worried about personal liability and Penelope wants her not to leave the company, Sole Proprietorship is the best deal for her.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "Sole Proprietorship."
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/21203378