Answer:
Explanation:
One-Party System
In a one-party system, there is no competition in this system. Here, the lone party nominates the candidates and the voters have only two choices i.e.
Not to vote at all or
write ‘yes’ or ‘no’ against the name of the candidates nominated by the party
Such a political system has been prominent in authoritarian regimes and communist countries such as China, North Korea, and Cuba. Before the collapse of communism, this system was also prevalent in USSR.
Two-Party System
In a two-party system, the power shifts between two major, dominant parties. So, for winning the elections, the winner will have to get the maximum number of votes. However, please know that maximum number of votes is not equivalent to a majority of votes.
So, the smaller parties tend to merge with the bigger parties or they drop out of elections. Such a parliamentary system prevails in Canada and Great Britain, in which there are two parties holding the maximum numbers of seats.
Multi-Party System
The third and the most common form of government is the multi-party system. In such a system, there are three or more parties which have the capacity to gain control of the government separately or in a coalition.
In case, no party achieves a clear majority of the legislative seats, then several parties join forces and form a coalition government. Countries like India, follow a multi-party system. Some people are of the view, that a multi-party system often leads to political instability in a country.
Hope it help and if it its correct please give brainliest
Stay Safe And Healthy
Thank You
how did the society change social trends & innovations that shaped popular culture during the 1920’s
Answer: style with gender roles and dress, Cars, radios, and telephones was owned for the first time ever. These drastic improvements of technology was big steps for american society.
This cheese is delicious.
Ese queso es delicioso.
Este queso es delicioso.
Esto queso es delicioso.
Eso queso es delicioso.
Answer:
este queso es delicioso
How were Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, and Joseph Stalin similar in their rise to power?
Answer:
Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, and Benito Mussolini all three were major dictators that made a huge impact in what we know as history today. Their leadership skills and ways of persuading the public were all different , but had some similarities. All three used propaganda and mainly focused on economic policies and the problems that the country faced with the government. Mussolini and Hitler shared more similarities to each other than Stalin shared with the both of them. All three of them were against democracy mainly because democracy gives the people freedom of speech and the ability to overthrow a leader.
Explanation:
To declare war, Adams had to get approval from Congress. What principle of government is being demonstrated?
The principle being demonstrated is Checks and Balances. In order for the president to declare war, the need approval from Congress. However, many times presidents have commenced military operations without approval or consent with Congress, which has raised questions and concerns.
I hope this helps! :)
Could a child born in a soddy in the 1880s have been a farmer during the Dust Bowl years?
Answer: Yes.
Explanation: Because it was about 10 to 20 years later that the removal of prairie grass started the beginning of the Dust Bowl.
To what extent did the Haitian Revolution benefit Haiti
How did Harding's critics respond to his use of the word normalcy?
Answer:
Normalcy, pronounced "NOR-mal-see," is a state of being normal, usual, or expected. ... It is another word for normality. Some people believe that normalcy should not be used because the word normality is more formally correct, but in the U.S., you'll often see normalcy used.
Explanation:
how many men were outside the federal arsenal in springfield massachusetts?
What is a law that was passed by Parliament in 1765?
Answer:
The Stamp Act of 1765 was ratified by the British parliament under King George III. It imposed a tax on all papers and official documents in the American colonies, though not in England.
Sources:
https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1035/stamp-act-of-1765#:~:text=The%20Stamp%20Act%20of%201765%20was%20ratified%20by%20the%20British,colonies%2C%20though%20not%20in%20England.
Los culpados por crear La Boicotizadora fueron:
a. Los independentistas
b. Los anexionistas
c. Los liberalistas
d. Los autonomistas
Answer: d) Los autonomistas
Explanation: "La Boicotizadora fue una sociedad secreta que surgió a fines de 1886 y cuya existencia se conoció luego de la fundación del Partido Autonomista en Ponce en marzo de 1887. El objetivo principal fue detener la expansión económica española a favor de los comerciantes puertorriqueños mediante el sistema del boicot."
Which sentence is the best description of the impact of European colonization on Native Americans?
A. Native Americans lost their lands to Europeans
B. British settlers absorbed Native Americans into colonial society.
C.British colonists adopted religious practices of Native Americans.
D. Native Americans protected Europeans from attacks.
Answer:
A. Native Americans lost their lands to Europeans
Explain what the U.S constitution promise to the state.
Answer:
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
Explanation:
Why did The Horn of Africa colonied by Italy
Answer:
Italian East Africa was an Italian colony in the Horn of Africa. It was formed in 1936 through the merger of Italian Somalia
Explanation:
Answer:
Italy wanted any territory they could get their hands on.
Explanation:
Italy wanted any territory they could get their hands on so they could create small or large colonies. Italy thought the more colonies you had the better the economy was and the strength of your government. It is not easy to conquer a country. Italy was not the only one that wanted a part of Africa.
in your opinion, could the outcome of the case have been politically motivated? Explain.
Answer:
Dred and Harriet Scott had no political motivation to pursue freedom. No one questioned their legitimate right to their freedom based on extended residence in free areas. That uncertainty had been resolved with the Missouri Supreme Court's 1824 decision in Winny v. ... Louis Circuit Court; only one resulted in freedom
Explanation:
How were native Americans impacted by the revolutionary war?
☽☺︎︎ They gained lands taken by the French.☀︎︎
☽☺︎︎they lost a lot of land.
☽☺︎︎They avoided the war.
☽☺︎︎They were forced onto reservations by the British war.
A story that attempts to give reasons for the existence of things, both physical and emotional, is called a myth.
True
False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Phillis wheatley is celebrated in american history as:
Answer:
The first black woman poet of note.
Explanation:
Fill in the blank:
A market economy is a type of economic system where people buy and trade goods and service freely. There is little to no influence from the _______.
Answer:
Government
Explanation:
The answer is government hope I helped
which scientist first proposed the heliocentric model of the solar system?
Which of these is a branch of the United States government
Answer:
Judicial Branch is a Branch of the United States government
Explanation:
Which religion is the religious minority group adhering to?
NEED ANSWER ASAP….. make simple pls
9. What are the arguments for and against electing judges rather than executive appointment or
legislative selection?
Answer:
Pros-
People get a say in who becomes judge.
Cons-
Could be Biased
Pro(2)-
A smaller possiblity that the judge was appointed under corruption
Con(2)-
Only a small possibility (not completely guaranteed to be uncorrupt)
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Pros-
People get a say in who becomes judge.
A smaller possiblity that the judge was appointed under corruption
Cons-
Could be Biased
Only a small possibility (not completely guaranteed to be uncorrupt)
The job of the judge should be the center of this discussion. Is the judge just the “mouth of the law” an interpreter of statutes, regulations? Or are they policymakers who let their own ideology and political views influence their decisions?
The fact is that if a judge is elected with a certain agenda, the cases he decides will most likely follow it, people like it or not. This can be a pro or a con to an elected judge.
For the ones who cherish the law above politic agenda, this is a huge con, the law should be the one that dictates what and how the judge should decide, not his political beliefs.
hope this helped!
mark me brainiest :D
_______ was a leading preacher during the Great Awakening.
Charles Townshend
Jonathan Edwards
Nathaniel bacon
Billy sunday
George washington
Answer:
It would be (B) Jonathan Edwards.
Explanation:
have a great day! :D
how did the treaty of paris 1783 change the political map of north america?
Explanation:
How did the Treaty of Paris 1783 change the political map of North America? Great Britain gained land. The United States claimed land that had been under British control.
How did William Jennings Bryan's politics most reflect Populist policies?
A. He fought to tighten immigration limits.
B. He supported the direct election of senators.
C. He advocated strongly for bimetallism.
D. He opposed government support for farmers.
Answer:
D. He opposed government support for farmers.
Explanation:
The election of 1896 was just as much a partisan battle over the future of American economic policy as the 2012 election. On this day in 1896, William Jennings Bryan delivered his rousing speech as a delegate to the Democratic convention declaring that mankind would not be “crucified on a cross of gold.” In the speech, Bryan, who was from the western farming state of Nebraska, advocated the inclusion of a silver standard for U.S. currency, which rallied the populist base of the Democratic Party and helped Bryan win the nomination for the presidency.
To take a step back in history, the source of the issue began with the Gold Rush in 1849, which altered the bi-metallism status quo. For decades, both gold and silver backed U.S. currency and both silver and gold species could be turned into a Sub-Treasury Mint for dollars. The government valued silver at a ratio of 16:1 to gold in ounces. With the flood of gold to the market following the Gold Rush, people could sell their silver privately and to foreign markets at a lower ratio, thus making more money. However, when silver was discovered in Nevada in the 1860s, the ratio of silver to gold sold privately or abroad increased, but the government continued to offer the 16:1 ratio. In short, the government policy increased currency circulation, benefitting westerners, rural farmers, and the poor who could more easily pay off debts or make purchases. Meanwhile, Wall Street and banks in the East mobilized against the government’s policy because they would not receive as much profit on loans to farmers and the poor.
However, by 1873, the flood of silver into government coffers created an economic crisis. Congress responded by passing the Coinage Act of 1873, which effectively ended bi-metallism by eliminating the silver dollar and by making gold the only metallic standard (though the U.S. did not accept the Gold Standard de jure until 1900). Western miners and farmers termed it the “Crime of 1873.” Their “Free Silver” movement became a core constituency of the Democratic Party, represented by William Jennings Bryan.
A clear partisan divide in the elections of 1896 and 1900 centered on the bi-metallism debate. Republican candidate William McKinley blamed the Democrats and their platform of bi-metallism for the Panic of 1893, while Republicans and Eastern banking interests called the gold standard “sound money” policy. One article of campaign propaganda is illustrative: McKinley’s campaign issued fake dollar bills that read “In God We Trust…for the Other 53 Cents” to argue that the dollar backed by silver would only be worth 47 cents. Another campaign poster linked the Republican Party’s gold coin as “sound money” policy to the beneficial aspects of the party’s protectionist policy compared to the detrimental impact of the Democratic Party’s free trade policy.
In the “Cross of Gold” speech, Bryan argued that the Democratic Party’s focus on bi-metallism in its platform was justified because a gold standard alone could not solve the country’s problems at the time, including debt, small business failure, and monopolies. According to Bryan, if silver was restored, “all other necessary reforms will be possible.” He compared the situation to fights over the national bank, arguing that “What we need is an Andrew Jackson to stand, as Jackson stood, against the encroachments of organized wealth.” In the speech, Bryan also connects the Democratic Party’s tradition since Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson against moneyed interests in favor of the little guy. Bryan favored a regulatory role for government in issuing money and called for banks to “go out of the governing business.”
The excerpt from the “Cross of Gold” speech below resounds with populist rhetoric, though the speech itself took the wind out of the Populist Party’s sails, rallying supporters to the Democratic Party. The excerpt also links the issue to the Democratic Party’s position on international trade.
nineteenth amendment to the united states constitution
Answer:
Woman's right to vote
Explanation:
Answer: The women's right to vote.
Explanation: August 18th, 1920, is when the government passed the 19th amendment, guaranteeing women the right to vote.
Hope this helps!
Can somebody give me few things of what women went through in the Progressive Era? Please!
Answer:
During the Progressive Era, women fought for rights , such as suffrage, or the right to vote. In reform, women worked to change the workplace, labor conditions, health, and safety. Due to all the progressors ( **A term used for men of that era**) going to war with Germany in WW1 women took over the industrial work space and many also worked towards attaining social reform to increase gender equality. The female role was drastically chacterized as equal to men after that point in time.
I will give you brainlist
every group of people_even family needs what?
to be committed to each other
Independent of each other
a Leader
a follower
Answer:
Its A to be commited to each other
Explanation:
Answer:
hope this help you
Explanation:
to be committed to each other
What steps did Egyptians follow to make paper?☝
Explanation:
cutting off thin ribbon-like strips of the interior of the Cyperus papyrus, and then laying out the strips side-by-side to make a sheet.
how did expectations at the beginning of the great war differ from reality?
Answer:
The war was going to last longer than people expected. ... The war was going to last longer than people expected.
Explanation:
o don't need explaning