PLEASE HELP WILL MARK BRAINIEST!!!!!!

Answer: 2/5 Step-by-step explanation: The easiest approach is to realize that one hour is 3 times longer than 20 minutes. The longer the time, the more they will pave.  

Answer:

205+2w=195+3w

Step-by-step explanation:

:)

The equation to represent when the weights are the same will be 3w + 195 = 2w + 205 and the number of weeks is 10.

A connection between a number of variables results in a linear model when a graph is displayed. The variable will have a degree of one.

The linear equation is given as,

y = mx + c

Where m is the slope of the line and c is the y-intercept of the line.

Henry and Jose are putting on weight for football. Henry weighs 205 pounds and is acquiring 2 pounds each week Jose weighs 195 pounds and is acquiring 3 pounds each week.

Let 'w' be the number of weeks and 'y' be the total weight. Then the equations are given as,

y = 2w + 205

y = 3w + 195

If the weight becomes the same. Then the number of weeks is given as,

3w + 195 = 2w + 205

Simplify the equation, then we have

3w + 195 = 2w + 205

3w - 2w = 205 - 195

w = 10

More about the linear equation link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/11897796

#SPJ2

Answer:that is 0.01541

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

If I have to guess, I’ll say

Consecutive angles are congruent.

One pair of parallel sides.

Consecutive angles are supplementary.

Step-by-step explanation:

if I’m wrong, I’m sorry. If I’m right, mark me brainlest!

Answer:

Consecutive angles are supplementary.

Both pairs of opposite of angles are congruent.

Both pairs of opposite sides are congruent.

Step-by-step explanation:

I took the quiz and this was the correct answer.

For the first integral, z = π/4 is a pole of order 3 and lies inside the contour |z| = 1. Compute the residue:

[tex]\displaystyle \mathrm{Res}\left(\frac{e^z\cos(z)}{\left(z-\frac\pi4\right)^3}, z=\frac\pi4\right) = \lim_{z\to\frac\pi4}\frac1{(3-1)!} \frac{d^{3-1}}{dz^{3-1}}\left[e^z\cos(z)\right][/tex]

We have

[tex]\dfrac{d^2}{dz^2}[e^z\cos(z)] = -2e^z \sin(z)[/tex]

and so

[tex]\displaystyle \mathrm{Res}\left(\frac{e^z\cos(z)}{\left(z-\frac\pi4\right)^3}, z=\frac\pi4\right) = - \lim_{z\to\frac\pi4} e^z \sin(z) = -\frac{e^{\pi/4}}{\sqrt2}[/tex]

Then by the residue theorem,

[tex]\displaystyle \int_C \frac{e^z\cos(z)}{\left(z-\frac\pi4\right)^3} \, dz = 2\pi j \left(-\frac{e^{\pi/4}}{\sqrt2}\right) = \boxed{-\sqrt2\,\pi e^{\pi/4} j}[/tex]

For the second integral, z = 2j and z = j/2 are both poles of order 2. The second poles lies inside the rectangle, so just compute the residue there as usual:

[tex]\displaystyle \mathrm{Res}\left(\frac{\cosh(2z)}{(z-2j)^2\left(z-\frac j2\right)^2}, z=\frac j2\right) = \lim_{z\to\frac j2}\frac1{(2-1)!} \frac{d^{2-1}}{dz^{2-1}}\left[\frac{\cosh(2z)}{(z-2j)^2}\right] = \frac{16\cos(1)-24\sin(1)}{27}j[/tex]

The other pole lies on the rectangle itself, and I'm not so sure how to handle it... You may be able to deform the contour and consider a principal value integral around the pole at z = 2j. The details elude me at the moment, however.

The width of the mat around the photo is 3 inches

The combined area of the of the photo and math = 224 square inches

The combined area is represented as:

(2w +8)(2w + 10) = 224

Expand the equation using the distributive rule

[tex]4w^2+20w+16w+80=224\\\\4w^2+36w+80-224=0\\\\4w^2+36w-144=0[/tex]

Divide through by 4

[tex]w^2+9w-36=0[/tex]

Factorize the resulting quadratic equation to solve for w

[tex]w^2-3w+12w-36=0\\\\w(w-3)+12(w-3)=0\\\\(w-3)(w+12)=0[/tex]

w  -  3  =  0

w   =  3

w  +  12  =  0

w   =  -12

The width of the mat around the photo is 3 inches

Learn more on area here: https://brainly.com/question/20968176

The width of the mat around the photo is 3 inches

Combined area:

2w +8)(2w + 10) = 224

where,

w = width of the mat around the photo

(2w +8)(2w + 10) = 224

open parenthesis

4w² + 20w + 16w + 80 = 224

4w² + 36w + 80 - 224 = 0

4w² + 36w - 144 = 0

divide through by 4

w² + 9w - 36 = 0

solve quadratic equation using factorization method

w² + 12w - 3w - 36 = 0

w(w + 12) - 3(w + 12) = 0

(w + 12) (w - 3) = 0

w + 12 = 0 or w - 3 = 0

w = -12 or w = 3

The width of the mat around the photo cannot be a negative value.

Therefore, the width of the mat around the photo is 3 inches

Learn more about quadratic equation:

https://brainly.com/question/1214333

Answer:

The answer is b

Step-by-step explanation:

During the 8-9 , Mr hare travel 40miles

For the time 9 onwards they travel concurrently,

Let x be the distance covered by both since they can only meet if they covered the sams distance,

x/50 = x/40 -1 ,where the 1 is the (8-9) 1 hr

x/40 - x/50 = 1

x = 200

Time take by Mr Hare = 200/ 40 = 5

from 8 add 5 hours will be 1

Note, i took this answer from an answer from another answer.

Answer:

16

Have a good day <3

Answer:

The answer is 4.2,

Hope that helped. x

Step-by-step explanation:

3 x 7 (3*7) = 21

21 divided by 5 = 4.2.

Answer:

4.2

Step-by-step explanation:

Using PEMDAS,

We know that to solve (3*7) divided by 5, we will need to solve what is in the parenthesis.

So, we need to figure out what is 7*3, which is 21.

This is what we have right now:

21 divided by 5

The next step is dividing,

In the end, the answer is 4.2, hope this helped!

Answer:

x = 20°

Step-by-step explanation:

OA = OB

so 140°+x°+x° = 180°

140+2x = 180

2x = 40

x = 20°

It is evident from the problem statement that an overall price reduction of Nike air max shoes will lead to an increase in the demand for the shoe.

In Economics,  the relationship between price and demand is stated as follows "If all other factors remain equal, the higher the price of a good, the fewer people will demand that good. In other words, the higher the price, the lower the quantity demanded and vice versa."

In all, the Law of Demand tells us that if more people want to buy something, given a limited supply, the price of that thing will be bid higher, also of the price of something is low the demand will be high.

learn more:

https://brainly.com/question/25585026

Answer:

huh

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the BMI equation, it is found that weights between 139.4 and 195.2 pounds will keep his BMI between 20 and 28.

The BMI B, for a person of weight w(in pounds) and height h(in inches) is given by:

[tex]BMI = \frac{703w}{h^2}[/tex]

In this problem:

For a BMI of 20 inches, the weight is:

[tex]BMI = \frac{703w}{h^2}[/tex]

[tex]20 = \frac{703w}{70^2}[/tex]

[tex]w = \frac{20 \times 70^2}{703}[/tex]

[tex]w = 139.4[/tex]

For a BMI of 28 inches, the weight is:

[tex]BMI = \frac{703w}{h^2}[/tex]

[tex]28 = \frac{703w}{70^2}[/tex]

[tex]w = \frac{28 \times 70^2}{703}[/tex]

[tex]w = 195.2[/tex]

Weights between 139.4 and 195.2 pounds will keep his BMI between 20 and 28.

To learn more about the BMI, you can take a look at https://brainly.com/question/24457127

Answer:

If you're moving the vehicle to the right, shoulder check by moving your head 90° to the right. Turn your head 90° degrees in the direction you're moving the vehicle. And, if you're moving the vehicle to the left, you shoulder check to the left by turning your head 90° to the left.

Answer:

18.6cm

Step-by-step explanation:

there is a theorem that states that the midsegment of a triangle (midpoint to midpoint, in this case X and Y) is half of the base (in this case BC)

when applied to the triangle shown:

XY= 1/2 BC

substitute to get

XY=1/2*6.4

XY=3.2

perimeter of BCYX

=XY+YC+CB+BX

=3.2+4+6.4+5

=18.6cm

hope this helps

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

This is an isosceles triangle. You can tell because 2 of the sides are equal and the third is not equal to either of the other two.

x + x + 56 = 180                  Combine the left

2x + 56 = 180                      Subtract 56 from both sides.

2x = 180 - 56

2x = 124                               Divide by 2

x = 124/2

x = 62

[tex]2\dfrac 29 = -\dfrac 45 m \\\\\implies 2+ \dfrac 29 =- \dfrac 45 m \\\\\implies \dfrac{20}9 = -\dfrac 45 m \\\\\implies 5(20) = (-4m)9\\\\\implies 100 = -36m\\\\\implies m = -\dfrac{100}{36} \\\\\implies m = -\dfrac{25}9\\\\\implies m=-2\dfrac 79[/tex]

Therefore, the answer is m = -25/9.

Hoped this helped.

[tex]-BrainaicUser1357-[/tex]

Answer:

I've done alot of calculations on this but I cant get a definite answer I hope you got it I'm sorry I couldn't help you I tried but only got into a dead end

Answer:

$245,000

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the intial cost = x

[tex]100\% + 36\% = 136\% = 1.36[/tex]

[tex]1.36x = 333200[/tex]

[tex]x = \frac{333200}{1.36} [/tex]

[tex]x = 245000[/tex]

Answer:

i think that it would be 0

Answer:

28

Step-by-step explanation:

8*2=16

3*4=12

Then you add 16+12

hopefully it helps

Answer:

76

Step-by-step explanation:

plug in 4 in the equation:

8(4)2 + 3(4) = 76

The way to balance a firm's need to succeed and the need for not asking the workers for perfection is through the offering of training to workers, which allows them to notably improve their performances autonomously, without this being directly instigated by the company's directory.

That is, through the education of workers in the different areas of their jobs, the level of the same will be improved and better results will be obtained.

Learn more about perfectionism in https://brainly.com/question/7277328

Using the negative binomial distribution, it is found that:

a) [tex]E(X) = 15[/tex]

b) [tex]Var(X) = 6.67[/tex]

c) [tex]P(X = 12) = 0.0883[/tex]

Negative binomial distribution:

It is the number of trials until q successes of a binomial variable, with p probability of success.

The expected value is:

[tex]E(X) = \frac{q}{p}[/tex]

The variance is:

[tex]Var(X) = \frac{pq}{(1 - p)^2}[/tex]

The probability mass function is:

[tex]P(X = x) = C_{x+q-1,q-1}(1 - p)^xp^q[/tex]

[tex]C_{n,x} = \frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!}[/tex]

In this problem, the parameters are: [tex]q = 6, p = 0.4[/tex].

Item a:

[tex]E(X) = \frac{6}{0.4} = 15[/tex]

Item b:

[tex]Var(X) = \frac{6(0.4)}{(1 - 0.4)^2} = 6.67[/tex]

Item c:

[tex]P(X = 12) = C_{17,5}(0.6)^12(0.4)^6 = 0.0883[/tex]

To learn more about the negative binomial distribution, you can take a look at https://brainly.com/question/15246027

Answer:

-1.25x-5

Step-by-step explanation:

Multiply using Distribution:

1.25(-x-4)

-1.25x-5

My answer can't be simplified anymore, since there isn't any like terms.

Answer:

Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

They are equal acute triangles, are congurent. Your welcom

The average distance is 300 yards

The ratio is given as:

Driver : 2-iron = 5 : 4

When the iron driver is 240 yards, we have:

Driver : 240 = 5 : 4

Express as fraction

Driver/240 = 5/4

Multiply both sides by 240

Driver= 300

Hence, the average distance is 300 yards

Read more about ratio at:

https://brainly.com/question/2328454

#SPJ1

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the equation you must first find the gradient and also look for the points on the graph.

I see point ( 0, 2) and point (4, 1)

Hence first find the gradient before equation

the gradient = y2-y1/x2-x1

y2 = 1

y1 = 2

x2 = 4

X1 =0

if you put in the values it will look like

1-2/4-0

-1/4

the gradient = -1/4

So for the equation the formula is

remember m is the gradient

y - y1 = m ( x - x1 )

so put in the value from only one point so you can choose either (0,2 ) or (4,1 )

I will go with (4, 1)

y - y1 = m ( x - x1 )

y - 1 = m ( x - 4 )

y -1 = -1/4 ( x - 4)

4 ( y-1) = -1(x-4)

4y- 4 = -1x +4

4y - 4 -4 = -1x

4y -8= -1x

4y + 1x -8 = 0

this is the equation.

thanks and good luck.

1 km = 1000 m, so:

23,769 km = 23,769 · 1000 m = 23 769 m

Answer:

23769m

Step-by-step explanation:

Basicly, 3.769x 1000= 23769m

Please mark brainliest

Answer:

$140.41

Step-by-step explanation:

250 * 1.3687 = 3412.175 Euros.

- 150 Euros = 192.175

192.175  1.3687 = $140.41