Please help!! PLEASE! Directions: Write Athens if statement pertains to Athens or write Spartans if statement pertains to the Spartans.

Answer:

Explanation:

1. Realizing Atahualpa was initially more valuable alive than dead, Pizarro kept the emperor in captivity while he made plans to take over his empire.In response, Atahualpa appealed to his captors' greed, offering them a room full of gold and silver in exchange for his liberation.

1.2

Pizarro's timing for conquest was perfect. By 1532, the Inca Empire was embroiled in a civil war that had decimated the population and divided the people's loyalties. ... Sending his brother Hernan as an envoy, Pizarro invited Atahualpa back to Cajamarca for a feast in honor of Atahualpa's ascendance to the throne.

The noise and smoke of fire-flashing European weapons, as much as their deadly destructiveness, carried the day for the Spanish conquistadores at Cajamarca, Peru. Sheer shock made a nonsense of the numbers as Francisco Pizarro’s 128 invaders defeated the Inca army.

1.3

His men met Pizarro's men at their most disorganized and they reported back by word of mouth that they were not fighting men. ... Atahualpa's general Chalcuchima was deceived into surrendering his large army to the Spaniards.

notes

What were Atahualpa's advantages?

1. In middle of own empire surrounded by millions of subjects

2. Surrounded by 80,000 soldiers

Why was Atahualpa's capture decisive for the European conquest of the Incan Empire?

They would have won anyways but the conquest made it quicker and easier.

Why?

The Incas saw Atahualpa as a sun god and listened to his orders even from prison.

How did Pizarro capture Atahualpa?

The Spaniards' steel swords and other weapons, steel armor, guns and horses. Complete imbalance of equipment.

La respuesta correcta es D) Oidores.

Encargados de ventilar los procesos judiciales en las Reales Audiencias, nos referimos a los Oidores.

En la época de la Nueva España, cuando se establecieron las instituciones Españolas en territorios del Caribe y Latinoamérica, una de las instituciones más importantes que se estableció en estos territorios fue la llamada Real Audiencia.

Esta institución de carácter judicial fue la máxima autoridad en materia de a apelación penal en las entonces llamadas Indias, posteriormente, la Nueva España. Su jurisdicción era tanto civil como criminal en todo el territorio, y los encargados de ventilar los procesos judiciales en las Reales Audiencias fueron los Oidores.

Para el año 1511, ya se había establecido la primera Audiencia en en Santo Domingo. Posteriormente los Españoles las fueron estableciendo en lo que ahora es territorio Mexicano, Guatemala, Lima o Panamá.

El encargado de ventilar los procesos judiciales en las Audiencias Reales es Inquisidores.

Encargado de ventilar los procesos judiciales en las Audiencias Reales, nos referimos a Inquisidores por sus funciones judiciales y de investigación. Un inquisidor era un funcionario con funciones judiciales o de investigación en una inquisición.

La Inquisición es una organización o programa cuyo objetivo es eliminar la herejía y otras cosas en contra de la doctrina o las enseñanzas de la fe católica. Esta inquisición la llevan a cabo los inquisidores por su función por lo que podemos concluir que el encargado de ventilar los procesos judiciales en las Audiencias Reales son los Inquisidores.

Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/19339349

Answer:

lol im watching promised neverland

Explanation:

Answer:

Secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity

Explanation:

This means that our rights and blessings of freedom and tranquility cannot be overthrown by the government.

Answer:

Preamble

Explanation:

The Declaration of Independence was made in unison by all the thirteen colonies of the United States of America in 1776. The document has five different parts which include the Introduction, Preamble, Section 1, Section 2, and Conclusion.

The Preamble stated that the colonies have the right and duty to abolish a government that found destructive, abusive, and full of commandeering.

Hence, in this case, the correct answer is PREAMBLE

Answer:

Basically Napoleon went on about having "freedom" which impacted Brazil and Mexico to fight their own civil war in order to gain their "freedom" I guess? Basically he was spreading ideas of Nationalism which caused civil wars for freedom to happen in those countries.

Explanation:

Answer:

shut up

Explanation:

this website is usless

Answer:

it lasted for 54 years( 1916 ~ 1970)

Answer:

They did not want to be alive

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

yes it is possible. Fascism is a form of extreme nationalism. Fascists espouse extreme nationalism and cultural parochialism. they generally want to replace internationalist class solidarity with nationalist class collaboration.

while nationalism is different and very acceptable, as long as it doesn't go extreme and turn to facism.

Answer:

This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future. The psychiatrist testified that he did not know of any "standard psychiatric or medical procedures used in arriving at a determination or predicting future dangerousness" and that he was unaware of specific empirical data or studies. He issued his opinion without engaging in any testing or any other objective measures or use of an actuarial method. His basis for this opinion was discussions with the prosecutors and review of some records regarding the defendant. The defense attorney objected to the testimony as unreliable under the standards for expert testimony established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceutical (i.e., that proffered evidence must be grounded in scientific reasoning or methodology). The district court overruled the objections and allowed the expert testimony to go to the jury.

Explanation:

Answer:

This is the Supreme Court opinion on the case of United States v. Fields. Abel Fields, a resident of California, is being tried for violating the Stolen Valor Act which was signed into law in 2006. In 2011, Abel Fields attended a city meeting about public safety.

He spoke publicly at the meeting, explaining that his military experience gave him the knowledge to speak with authority about public safety issues.

During his speech, he claimed that he had served in the military for eight years. He also claimed that he had received the Purple Heart, a prestigious medal. However, each of Fields’s claims was false. He had never served in the military, and he had never received a medal. After being found guilty and charged with an $1,000 fine, Fields appealed the court’s decision which brings us here.

Abel Fields argued that the Stolen Valor Act was unconstitutional, and that his right to free speech had been violated, therefore, I will be taking in a count of several similar rulings on other cases to help me make a decision.

Answer:

binding arbitration  would end unrestricted economies all through a large part of the economy. Government authorities could direct wages and working conditions to any organization sufficiently disastrous to be coordinated.

binding arbitration  would do the same amount of harm to laborers' privileges. They would lose all resources as of now accessible to them. Endorsers would lose their entitlement to decide on sanctioning the agreement they should work under, and they couldn't strike over the last agreement, regardless of how awful it is. Restricting intervention gives laborers an agreement if they like it.

binding arbitration  could likewise cost laborers their annuities. Associations are probably going to press the mediator to constrain recently coordinated specialists to join a multi-manager association benefits plan, and in enterprises where these plans are normal, the judge would almost certainly concur.

Explanation:

With organization enrollment in consistent decay, Coordinated Work faces a decision. It can accomplish the difficult work important to shed the New Arrangement model that actually shapes its obsolete approach and adjust to the present economy. Or on the other hand it can utilize its political muscle and get Congress to make it simpler to constrain laborers to join.

Answer:

D

Explanation:

It created inventions that greatly increased everyones lives such as for travel, industry, home, etc.

Answer:

trade routes for the first question

1. The time period of the Old Imperialism was around 1450-1650

2. European nations were looking for gold, glory, and god.

3. The entire globe was victim to Old Imperialism, but North and South America was where most of the action occurred, with European explorers tearing through and claiming land from native populations.

4. The time period of the New Imperialism was around 1790-1914

Answer:

By trade on the Silk Road

gaining independence

Explanation:

Answer:

peoples beliefs

Explanation:

Answer:

D. Everyone who entered the lottery had an equal chance of being chosen

Explanation:

Land lotteries were more just and promising because they allowed all participants to have the same chance of getting land (which was mostly stolen from Native Americans). This system only allowed the participation of male and white citizens, not allowing widows and orphans to participate. The land drawn had different sizes and people could not choose which land they wanted, since this was decided from a lottery, as a lottery should be. In this way, these systems managed to distribute a large number of lands among new settlers and allowed this distribution to be more just and have less space for corruption.

Answer:

D. Everyone who entered the lottery had an equal chance of being chosen

Explanation:

Maurya Empire was vaster as compared to Gupta Empire. Mauryan rulers followed a centralized administration structure, whereas Gupta rulers followed a decentralized administrative structure. Tax system during the Mauryan dynasty was stringent; whereas Gupta rulers favored more liberal tax system.

-Astolfo

Answer:

This diverse assortment of peoples defies physical stereotyping, because there is considerable regional variation. The early Arabs of the Arabian Peninsula were predominantly nomadic pastoralists who herded their sheep, goats, and camels through the harsh desert environment.

Explanation:

Answer:   C

Explanation:

Answer:

B is the correct answer.

Answer:

He constructed The Royal Road and expamded trade

Explanation:

Answer:

(D)  He constructed The Royal Road and expamded trade                                                    

Answer:

I think it's C, but it might be A, I'm so sorry if it's not C, it seems like the most likely answer

Answer:

He was known as a Pacifist. His strong suit was the domestic area of running the USA not war. He was quoted multiple times to not be ready for war. Besides this most of the American citizens also like remaining neutral.

Hope this helped!! Have a good one!

Answer:

Explanation:

The Indian Removal Act was signed into law on May 28, 1830, by United States President Andrew Jackson. The law authorized the president to negotiate with southern Native American tribes for their removal to federal territory west of the Mississippi River in exchange for white settlement of their ancestral lands.

plz mark as brainliest

Answer:

Nope

Explanation:

I don't think so cause extinct animals are BIG

Answer:

no

Explanation:

because 1 its impossible and 2 because if you did the monster would most likely not be able to adapt to all the changes that have happened to the world and how much it has changed (not including the impact the human race might have on it). Can i have brainliest?

Answer:

capital

Explanation:

The answer is C you're welcome <3

Answer:

Explanation:

The manorial system has 3 different classes of land including

Demesne, the part directly controlled by the lord and used for the benefit of his household and dependents.

Dependent (serf or villein) holdings carrying the obligation that the peasant household supply the lord with specified labor services or a part of its output

and finally Free peasant land, without such obligation but otherwise subject to manorial jurisdiction and custom, and owing money rent fixed at the time of the lease.

in each manor they had a village whose inhabitants worked that land, and a manor house where the lord who owned or controlled the estate lived. Manors also had woods, orchards, gardens, and ponds  or lakes  where fish could be found.

Answer:

Sheep were brought from Spain and used for wool, milk, and meat. Cattle were also brought and were originally bred for hides and later for meat. The concept of ranching came from Spain. Horses were used all over Europe and brought to the New World. Columbus brought 8 pigs on his first voyage.

Explanation:

This is what I put thank you have a nice day

Answer:

I saw that too

Colonists begin to boycott products made in Britain hoping to put  merchants out of business.

Explanation:

The Stamp Act was put onto the colonists in 1765 by Great Britain. This made it so paper products and printed materials had a tax on them.

The colonists were not happy with the Stamp Act and felt like it was unfair. They did not have anybody in the British Parliament to vouch for them, which is called "taxation without representation." Great Britain said the taxing actually was fair, as they needed money to pay for the very expensive French and Indian War and they had troops protecting the colonists.

Even though Great Britain said the taxing was fair, the colonists still believed otherwise. They began to boycott the products that had the tax on them, even starting to become violent at times. They would burn products and sometimes hurt British merchants.

Eventually, Great Britain realized the Stamp Act was doing more harm than good. They were losing money and British merchants were as well, along with being harmed. They repealed this act on March 18, 1766.

Answer:

The 13th Amendment was the first amendment to the United States Constitution during the period of Reconstruction. The amendment was ratified on December 6, 1865, and ended the argument about whether slavery was legal in the United States.

Explanation:UxU

Answer:

i think presidential reconstruction

Explanation: