PLEASE ANSWER I HAVE 10 MINUTES!!!

Answer:  ₹ 600 and 15% discount rate i believe

Step-by-step explanation:

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  x = -0.25+√2.4375i or -0.25-√2.4375i

Step-by-step explanation:

The quadratic formula works for this. The quadratic equation ...

  ax² +bx +c = 0

has solutions given by the quadratic formula:

  [tex]x=\dfrac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}[/tex]

Your equation ...

  2x² +x +5 = 0

has coefficients a=2, b=1, c=5, so the quadratic formula tells you the solutions are ...

  [tex]x=\dfrac{-1\pm\sqrt{1^2-4\cdot2\cdot5}}{2\cdot2}=\dfrac{-1\pm\sqrt{-39}}{4}\\\\x=\left\{-\dfrac{1}{4}+\dfrac{\sqrt{39}}{4}i, -\dfrac{1}{4}-\dfrac{\sqrt{39}}{4}i\right\}[/tex]

The decimal equivalents are ...

  x = -0.25+√2.4375i   or   -0.25-√2.4375i . . . . . . the 'i' is outside the radical

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

given:

Ann, Ben, and Cindy were eating strawberries.

The ratio of the numbers of berries they ate is 5:5:7.

If Cindy ate 30 strawberries less than Ann and Ben together,

find:

what is the total number of strawberries the three of them ate?

solution:

add the ratios 5 + 5 + 7 = 17

since Cindy ate 30, less than Ann and Ben together so, the equation is

7x = 5x + 5x - 30

7x - 10x = -30

x = 30/3

x = 10

ann 5 x 10 = 50

ben 5 x 10 = 50

cindy 7 x 10 = 70  

total            = 170

==============================================

Explanation:

A = number Ann ate

B = number Ben ate

C = number Cindy ate

Let x be some positive whole number

Since A,B,C is in the ratio 5:5:7, this means

A = 5x

B = 5x

C = 7x

Note how A:B:C = 5x:5x:7x = 5:5:7. We divide all parts by x to simplify the ratio.

-------------------

Cindy ate 30 strawberries less than Ann and Ben, so

C = A+B-30

C = 5x+5x-30

C = 10x-30

Earlier in the last section we had C = 7x, and now we found C = 10x-30

Since we're talking about the same C value, we can equate and solve

C = 7x

10x-30 = 7x ... replace C with 10x-30

10x-7x = 30

3x = 30

x = 30/3

x = 10

------------------

With this x value, we now know that...

A = 5x = 5*10 = 50

B = 5x = 5*10 = 50

C = 7x = 7*10 = 70

Cindy's count (70) is 30 less than Ann and Ben's combined count (50+50 = 100), so that helps confirm the answer.

Further confirmation comes from 50:50:70 reducing to 5:5:7 when you divide all parts by the GCF 10.

--------------------

The last step is to add the values of A, B and C.

A+B+C = 50+50+70

A+B+C = 100+70

A+B+C = 170

---------------------

Side note: since A+B+C = 5x+5x+7x = 17x, this means that the final answer is a multiple of 17.

Answer:

bowl of colorful marbels

Step-by-step explanation:

bowl+marbels

Answer:

My estimate  think it 1225

Step-by-step explanation:

49 / 2 * (49 + 1) = 1225

Answer: ha no way have the same question

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

17

Step-by-step explanation:

3 1/2+3 1/2=5 which is 40 min

5=40mins

5+3 1/2=81/2

1 hour=8 1/12

8 1/2+8 1/2= 17

17 in two hours

Answer:

Question 1  

The test statistics is  [tex]t = 0.44[/tex]

The decision rule is

 Fail to reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion

There is no  sufficient evidence to show that there is a difference in the average time to complete the installation of the solar panels

Question 2

The degree of freedom is  [tex]df = 92 [/tex]

The decision rule is

Reject the null hypothesis  

The conclusion

There is  sufficient evidence to show that there is a difference in the average time to complete the installation of the solar panels

Explanation:

Considering Question 1

Here we are told to provide the test statistics

From the question we are told that

  The first sample size is  [tex]n_1 = 31[/tex]

  The second  sample size is  [tex]n_ 2 =  46[/tex]

   The first sample mean is  [tex]\= x_1 = 525 \ minutes[/tex]

    The first standard deviation is  [tex]\sigma_1 =  47.7[/tex]

    The second sample mean is  [tex]\= x_2 = 520 \ minutes[/tex]

   The second standard deviation is  [tex]\sigma_2 =  48.2[/tex]

The null hypothesis  is  [tex]H_o :  \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 0[/tex]

The alternative hypothesis is  [tex]H_a :  \mu_1 - \mu_2 \ne 0[/tex]

Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

      [tex]df = n_1 + n_2  -2[/tex]

=>    [tex]df = 31 + 46  -2[/tex]

=>    [tex]df = 75 [/tex]

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

 [tex]t =  \frac{(\= x_1 - \= x_2 )-0}{ \sqrt{\frac{\sigma_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{\sigma_2^2}{n_2} } }[/tex]

=> [tex]t =  \frac{( 525-  520 )-0}{ \sqrt{\frac{47.7^2}{31} + \frac{48.2^2}{46} } }[/tex]

=> [tex]t = 0.44[/tex]

Let assume that the level of confidence is  [tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex]

Generally the probability of t at a degree of freedom of  is  [tex]df = 75[/tex]

    [tex]P(t > 0.44 ) = 0.33060124 [/tex]

Generally the p-value is mathematically represented as

   [tex]p-value  =  2 *  P(t > 2.398)[/tex]

=>   [tex]p-value  =   2 * 0.33060124[/tex]

=>   [tex]p-value  =  0.66120[/tex]      

From the value obtain we see that [tex]p-value  >  \alpha[/tex] hence we fail to reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is that there is no  sufficient evidence to show that there is a difference in the average time to complete the installation of the solar panels

Considering Question 2

Here we are told to provide the degree of freedom

From the question we are told

    The first sample size is  [tex]n_1 = 39[/tex]

     The first sample mean is  [tex]\= x_1 = 582 \ minutes[/tex]

     The first standard deviation is  [tex]\sigma_2 =  63.8[/tex]

     The second sample size is  [tex]n_ 2 =  55[/tex]

     The second sample mean is  [tex]\= x_2 = 542 \ minutes[/tex]

     The second standard deviation is  [tex]\sigma_2 =  97.8 [/tex]

The null hypothesis  is  [tex]H_o :  \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 0[/tex]

The alternative hypothesis is  [tex]H_a :  \mu_1 - \mu_2 \ne 0[/tex]

Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

      [tex]df = n_1 + n_2  -2[/tex]

=>    [tex]df = 39 + 55  -2[/tex]

=>    [tex]df = 92 [/tex]

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

 [tex]t =  \frac{(\= x_1 - \= x_2 )-0}{ \sqrt{\frac{\sigma_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{\sigma_2^2}{n_2} } }[/tex]

=> [tex]t =  \frac{( 582 -  542 )-0}{ \sqrt{\frac{63.8^2}{39} + \frac{97.8^2}{55} } }[/tex]      

=>  [tex]t = 2.398[/tex]

Let assume that the level of confidence is  [tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex]

Generally the probability of t at a degree of freedom of  is  [tex]df = 92 [/tex]

    [tex]P(t > 2.398 ) = 0.00925214[/tex]

Generally the p-value is mathematically represented as

   [tex]p-value  =  2 *  P(t > 2.398)[/tex]

=>   [tex]p-value  =   2 * 0.00925214[/tex]

=>   [tex]p-value  =  0.0185[/tex]      

From the value obtain we see that [tex]p-value  <  \alpha[/tex] hence we reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is that there is  sufficient evidence to show that there is a difference in the average time to complete the installation of the solar panels

Complete Question

Valerie runs track and field. At meets, Valerie likes to buy protein bars, bananas, and sports drinks. Protein bars are $1, bananas are $0.50, and sports drinks are $2. Valerie has $10 to spend. She will spend no more than twice as much on sports drinks as bananas and at least three times as much on bananas as protein bars.

Let p represent the number of protein bars, b represent the number of bananas, and d represent the number of sports drinks that Valerie buys.

Which statements are true regarding Valerie's situation? Select all that apply A: p + 0.5b + 2d < 10 B: 0.5d + b + 3p < 10. C: d < 2b. D: b > 3p. E: 2d < b. F: 3b > p

Answer:

The statements that are true regarding Valerie's situation:

A: p + 0.5b + 2d < 10

C: d < 2b

D: b > 3p

Step-by-step explanation:

Lets represent

The number of protein bars as p.

The number of bananas as b.

The number of sports drinks that Valerie buys as d.

From the question:

We are told

Protein bars are $1

Bananas are $0.50

Sports drinks are $2.

She will spend no more than twice as much on sports drinks as bananas

d ≤ 2b = d < 2b

At least three times as much on bananas as protein bars.

b ≥ 3p = b > 3p

We are also told that:

Valerie has $10 to spend.

Hence:

$1 × p + $0.50 × b + $2 × d < $10

= p + 0.5b + 2d < 10

Therefore, the statements that are true regarding Valerie's situation:

A: p + 0.5b + 2d < 10

C: d < 2b

D: b > 3p

Answer:  2/3 = b/ac = d/e

Step-by-step explanation:

This is all I got if I got it right. Is this one of your answers?

Answer:

a= 2

b=4

c=3

d=2

e=3

Step-by-step explanation:

i hope this helps.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Substitute a = -3 and b = -8 to the expression 10a²b⁰:

10(-3)²(-8)⁰ = 10(9)(1) = 90

a⁰ = 1 for any real number

Answer:

90

Step-by-step explanation:

10a^2b^0

Let a=–3, b=–8

10 (-3)^2 ( -8)^0

10 * 9 *1

90

Answer: B. 8 x 10^3

Step-by-step explanation:

b. 8 x 10³

hope this helps

Answer:

We calculate the amount of gas used per km and multiply it by 286

Step-by-step explanation:

If we drive for 260km and use 12 litres of gas that means that we use

[tex]\frac{12}{260}[/tex] litres per km.

Now we multiply it by 286:

[tex]\frac{12}{260} *286 = \frac{858}{65} = 13.2[/tex]

So, the answer is 13.2 litres.

Answer:

ΔP  = 14

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]C(x) = 200 + 2x[/tex]

[tex]R(x) = 20x - \frac{x^2}{50}[/tex]

Required

Determine the change in profit

First, we need to determine the profit

[tex]P(x) = R(x) - C(x)[/tex]

[tex]P(x) = 20x - \frac{x^2}{50} - 200 - 2x[/tex]

Collect Like Terms

[tex]P(x) = - \frac{x^2}{50} + 20x - 2x- 200[/tex]

[tex]P(x) = - \frac{x^2}{50} + 18x- 200[/tex]

Differentiate wrt x

[tex]P'(x) = -\frac{x}{25} + 18[/tex]

When Profit increases from 100 to 101, the change becomes

ΔP  [tex]= -\frac{x}{25} + 18[/tex]Δx

Δx[tex]= (x_2 - x_1)[/tex]

Where

[tex]x_2 = 101[/tex]

[tex]x_1 = x = 100[/tex]

So, the expression: ΔP  [tex]= -\frac{x}{25} + 18[/tex]Δx becomes

ΔP  [tex]= (-\frac{x}{25} + 18)(x_2 - x_1)[/tex]

ΔP  [tex]= (-\frac{100}{25} + 18)(101 - 100)[/tex]

ΔP  [tex]= (-4+ 18)(1)[/tex]

ΔP  [tex]= (14)(1)[/tex]

ΔP  = 14

Answer:

a) 99.97%

b) 65%

Step-by-step explanation:

• 68% of data falls within 1 standard deviation from the mean - that means between μ - σ and μ + σ.

• 95% of data falls within 2 standard deviations from the mean - between μ – 2σ and μ + 2σ.

• 99.7% of data falls within 3 standard deviations from the mean - between μ - 3σ and μ + 3σ.

Mean of 98.35°F and a standard deviation of 0.64°F.

a. What is the approximate percentage of healthy adults with body temperatures within 3 standard deviations of the mean, or between 96.43°F and 100.27°F?

μ - 3σ

98.35 - 3(0.64)

= 96.43°F

μ + 3σ.

98.35 + 3(0.64)

= 100.27°F

The approximate percentage of healthy adults with body temperatures is 99.97%

b. What is the approximate percentage of healthy adults with body temperatures between 97 .71°F and 98.99°F?

within 1 standard deviation from the mean - that means between μ - σ and μ + σ.

μ - σ

98.35 - (0.64)

= 97.71°F

μ + σ.

98.35 + (0.64)

= 98.99°F

Therefore, the approximate percentage of healthy adults with body temperatures between 97.71°F and 98.99°F is 65%

Answer:

1.30 :)

All you have to do is see if the number on your left is greater than 5 or not if it’s is round up 1 if not it stays the same !

Hope this helped !!!

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the transformation T(a, b) can be change the pre image to the final image by following the rule as we explain below

if A(x, y) is a pre image, then A ' ( x', y') is its image, and x' = a+x, y' = b + y, where because of T(a, b) transformation

in our case Quadrilateral GHJK has vertices G(2, 3), so the coordinates of G”

can be found with

T(-4, -5) applied to G(2, 3) ⇒ G' (-4 +2, -5+3)=G' (-2, -2)

T(-4, -5) applied to G' (-2, -2) ⇒ G"(-4-2, -5-2) =G"(-6, -7)

the coordinates of G” are (-6, -7)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

its c on edg (-1, -7)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

24 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

since BD is an angle bisector, the given numbers are equal to each other

this means that you can write the equation as: 6x = x + 20

subtract x from both sides to move the variable to one side, this leaves you with: 5x = 20

then divide both sides by 5 to find x: x = 4

now substitute this into the value given for angle ABD: 6(4)

this gives you 24 degrees

Answer:

0

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Define

[tex]\lim_{x \to \infty} e^{x-x^2}[/tex]

Step 2: Substitute in infinity

[tex]\lim_{x \to \infty} e^{\infty-\infty^2}[/tex]

We know that the second exponent is always going to be bigger than the 1st exponent, so we would get a negative exponent.

[tex]\lim_{x \to \infty} e^{-\infty}[/tex]

We can simplify a negative exponent into a fraction.

[tex]\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{1}{e^{\infty}}[/tex]

We know that if we keep plugging in larger numbers for x, the denominator is going to be infinitely big. And bigger the number we are dividing by, the smaller the entire fraction is going to be.

Therefore, we would be approaching 0.

Answer:

a)Express the death per capita as a decimal rounded to 6 decimal places

0.000875 death per capita

b) Express the death per capita in Scientific notation

8.75 × 10^-4 death per capita

c) 279883 deaths

Step-by-step explanation:

a) Express the death per capita as a decimal rounded to 6 decimal places

The formula for Death Per capita is given as

Number of deaths/ Total population

Measurement : 7172 homicide deaths

Total population : 8.2 millon= 8,200,000

Death per capita = 7172/8200000

Death per capita = 0.00087463414 death per capita.

Approximately to 6 decimal places

= 0.000875 death per capita.

b) Express the death per capita in Scientific notation

The death per capita = 0.000875

In Scientific notation = 8.75 × 10^-4 death per capita

c) The United States has a population of about 320 million. If our homicide deaths were proportional to that of Honduras, how many deaths would we expect in the United States due to homicides? Round to the nearest person.

Measurement : 7172 homicide deaths

Total population : 8.2 millon= 8,200,000

The United States has a population of about 320 million

Death per capita in Honduras : Death per capita in United States

7172/8200000 : x/320,000,000

7172/8,200,000 = x/320,000,000

Cross Multiply

7172 × 320,000,000 = 8,200,000 × x

x = 7172 × 320,000,000/8,200,000

x = 279882.926829 deaths

Approximately to the nearest person = 279883 deaths

Answer:

This means that if you have that amount of those and you do whatever the rest of the question is.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

120 different ways

Step-by-step explanation:

So Fundamental Counting Principle helps understand probability. So for this question, they are asking how many different ways there are.

To do that, we have to split into sets.

Set A: 4 Theme Parks

Set B: 6 Passes

Set C: 5 Food Options

Now we have to multiply the sets.

4 x 6 x 5 = 120

Therefore, the answer is 120 different ways.

Answer:

2/9

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2/9

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: d

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

D. Carl's unit rate is 2 more miles per hour than Darren's unit rate.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

22.50

and you can pleasent do 22.50

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

no one and i am doing time pass and

6 130 will be a right answer

whe it is rong i am sorry

Answer:

6 teachers, and 130 student's

Step-by-step explanation: