Please and wet the question. Thanks

Answer: y = − 2 ( x + 4 ) 2 + 6

Step-by-step explanation:

Find the parabola through   ( − 2 , − 2 )  with vertex  ( − 4 , 6 )  using the vertex form  y = a ( x − h ) 2 + k .

Standard Form:  y = − 2 x 2 − 16 x − 26

Vertex Form:  y = − 2 ( x + 4 ) 2 + 6

Answer:

44 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

Because a right angle triangle if added all angles will=to 180 degrees

so 46+90=136

180-136=44

Answer:

44

Step-by-step explanation:

You add 46 to the 90 degree angle (right angle) and get 136. Then, because the angles of a triangle add up to 180 degrees all the time, you would do 180-136 and get 44.

Answer:

equivalent

Step-by-step explanation:

Equivalent means equal so equivalent expressions equal the same value.

Answer:

14s + 2

Step-by-step explanation:

add the s values up and you’ll get 14s (8s + 2s + 4s) and then add the regular ones and you’ll have 2 (6 + -4)

Answer:

He has had a quarter of the red sweets (1/4)

Step-by-step explanation:

3/12 is 1/4 when simplified

Answer:

1/4 or 3/12

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 3 red sweets out of all the sweets (3/12).

A simplified version of 3/12 would be 1/4.

Answer: b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the answer to this question would be A

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

When you add a negative number, you're basically subtracting it.

7 - 3 = 4

Hope this helps! Good luck :)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

60-10=50

they washed 50 cars.

Answer:

1. 2/5

2. -1/5

3. -1/3

Step-by-step explanation:

the parpendicular slope is found by taking the original slope and finding the opposite reciprocal. so just flip the slope and make it the opposite sign

-5/2  --->    2/5

+5/1  --->    -1/5

+3/1  --->    -1/3

Answer:

103/120

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

First part:

Set h(t) = 73 and solve for t.

-16t2 + 64t + 16 = 73

-16t2 + 64t - 57 = 0

Solve this quadratic equation for t.  You should get 2 positive solutions.  The lower value is the time to reach 73 on the way up, and the higher value is the time to reach 73 again, on the way down.

Second part:

Set h(t) = 0 and solve the resulting quadratic equation for t.  You should get a negative solution (which you can discard), and a positive solution.  The latter is your answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

It's the first one 18/3 =6

Step-by-step explanation:

This is the only answer that has all integers or whole numbers. Hope this helps!

Answer:

Its the fisrt one cause its the only one with a whole number.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x = -2

Step-by-step explanation:

The line x = - 5 means it is a straight vertical line that has no slope. This means that the slope is undefined.

Now, for this line to be parallel to the line passing through point P(−2, 6), it means the line will be a vertical line too with the equation of form (x = a).

Thus, the equation of the line is x = -2

The equation of the line is given by:

[tex]x = -2[/tex]

The equation of a line has the following format:

[tex]y = mx + b[/tex]

In which:

Line x = -5 is a horizontal line, thus, it's slope is undefined.

A line parallel will also be horizontal, with undefined slope.

It passes through point P(-2,6), thus, the equation of the line is:

[tex]x = -2[/tex]

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/16302622

Answer:

the answer is 48/100 im pretty sure .

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

12/25

Step-by-step explanation:

first you take your decimal and because it is a decmial the decimal is in a fraction, 48/100 don't pay attention to any 0's behind any other number.

once you have 48/100 divide the numerator(the top of the fraction) and the denominator(the bottom of the fraction) and divide it by 4

Answer:

[tex]\huge\boxed{y+3=-(x+2)}\\or\\\boxed{y-3=-(x+8)}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The point-slope form of an equation of a line:

[tex]y-y_1=m(x-x_1)[/tex]

[tex]m=\dfrac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}[/tex]

Put the coordinates of the given point:

(-2, -3); (-8, 3)

[tex]m=\dfrac{3-(-3)}{-8-(-2)}=\dfrac{3+3}{-8+2}=\dfrac{6}{-6}=-1\\\\\text{for}\ (-2;\ -3)\\\\y-(-3)=-1(x-(-2))\\\\y+3=-(x+2)\\\\\text{for}\ (-8;\ 3)\\\\y-3=-1(x-(-8)\\\\y-3=-(x+8)[/tex]

Answer:

Around 10 days ( 9.28 days: 9 days 6 hours 43 minutes 12 seconds).

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that 25 gizmos are produced each day, and 75 ¢ are made off of each one, a 174$ repair job will take away money that will need to be paid off.

We can create the following equation by using the amount of gizmos earned per day(x or time) multiplied the money made off of each one(in cents ¢), is equal to the repair job since it will be paid off once it is canceled out.

25x(75¢) = 174$.

Since the money made by each gizmo is in cents and not dollars, it is best to convert this into dollars since the repair job is in this form. Because 100¢ are in each dollar, 75¢ = 75/100 dollars = 3/4 dollars.

3/4 * 25 x = (3/4) * (25x) = (25*3) / 4 = 75/4x

(75/4)x = 174$

(75/4x) * (4/75) = (174$) * (4/75)

x = (174 * 4) / 75

x = 696 / 75

x = 9.28

We are multiplying by the reciprocal (numerator and denominator are switched) since it will make your coefficient 1 which is the variable itself. anything times it's reciprocal is equal to one.

75/4x = 174$

×4 ×4

(cancel out the denominator)

____________

75x = 696$

÷ 75 ÷ 75

(cancel out 75 to get the variable by itself)

___________

x = 696/75

x = 232/25

x = 928/100

x = 9.28

___________

Using a system of equation, the number of days it will take to recuvwr the repair cost is 58 days.

The increase in amount of gizmo produced after repair :

Prize per gizmo = 75 cent = $0.75

Repair cost = $174

The number of days it will take to recover the repair fee can be calculated thus :

(Increase on gizmo per day × cost per gizmo)× number of days = repair fee

(4 × 0.75)d= 174

3d = 174

d = 174 / 3

d = 58

Therefore, it will take 58 days to recover the repair fee.

Learn more : https://brainly.com/question/18796573

Answer:

21 sheets of paper

Step-by-step explanation:

If its basically 6 tickets to a piece of paper then you just divide 125 tickets by 6 and get 20.833.... Then your round to the nearest sheet which is 21.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

Approx. 21 sheets of paper

Step-by-step explanation:

1 sheet of paper is used to make 6 tickets

6 tickets = 1 sheet

If 1 sheet is used to make 6 tickets. The number of sheets used to make 125 tickets will more.

if

6 tickets = 1 sheet

125 tickets = (125÷6) × 1

= 20.83333333333

Subtract the [tex]x^2[/tex] terms from each other, then the [tex]x[/tex] terms, then the ones without any [tex]x[/tex] whatsoever.

[tex](12x^2 - 8x + 12) - (9x^2 +22x-46)[/tex]

First, we'll subtract [tex]9x^2[/tex] from [tex]12x^2[/tex]

[tex]12x^2-9x^2- = 3x^2[/tex]

Result: [tex]3x^2[/tex]

Next, we'll subtract [tex]22x[/tex] from [tex]-8x[/tex]

[tex]-8x - 22x = -30x[/tex]

Result: [tex]-30x[/tex]

Finally, we'll subtract [tex]-46[/tex] from [tex]12[/tex]

[tex]12-(-46) = 12+46 = 58[/tex]

Result: [tex]58[/tex]

Now, we can add these 3 results together.

First, we had [tex]3x^2[/tex], then [tex]-30x[/tex], and finally [tex]58[/tex].

Thus, our subtraction of

[tex](12x^2 - 8x + 12) - (9x^2 +22x-46)[/tex]

equals

[tex]3x^2-30x+58[/tex]

Answer:

$12,500

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

27,500.00

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: $5.40

Sales tax is a price you add to every 100 cents purchased.

Sally purchased a shirt of 5.00, and New York's sales tax is 8.200.

So, we multiply 8 by 5. We get the number 40, right?

You now add 0.40 to 5.00.

The answer totals at 5.40 because 5.00 + 0.40 = 5.40.

Hope this helps you out!

Answer:

one tenth of a galon

Step-by-step explanation:

I think this is the answer hope this helps (:

Answer:

13-(5*4)=?

13-20=-7

Step-by-step explanation:

the orginal number is 13 and accordin to the question it has stated that everysteps we have to take out 5 so what i did is that i multiplied 4 by 5 and i a going to subtract it from 13 which i have the result of -7.

Answer:

28

Step-by-step explanation:

first term(a)=13

difference(d)=5

t(4)=?

now,

t(4)=a+(n-1)d

=13+(4-1)5

=13+3×5

=28

Answer:

sure

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

hello

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

70 is the answer to the question

Answer:

[tex]70^{o}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Opposite angles in a parallelogram are equal. The opposite angle to A is C and we are trying to find angle C. Therefore, <C = <A, therefore, <c= 70 degrees

Answer:

$625

Step-by-step explanation:

You start with $500

The interest per year is 5% or 500 x 0.05 = $25

If it matures 5 years and each year has an increase of $25 then

Year 1 - $525

Year 2 - $550

Year 3 - $575

Year 4 - $600

Year 5 - $625

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

We express the interest rate r in decimal form, so we have r=5%=5100=0.05. The principal is P=500 and the time in years is t=5. So, the interest is I=Prt=(500)(0.05)(5)=$125. The interest earned is $125.

Answer: It has one solution (8, 2).

Step-by-step explanation:

I put both equations in Desmos and the solution was (8,2)

Complete Question

Researchers investigated whether the proportion of American teenagers with some level of hearing loss was different in 2005–2006 than in 1988–1994. They collected data on random samples of American teenagers in those two time periods. Let the symbol [tex]\pi __{05-06}}[/tex] denote the population proportion of American teenagers with some level of hearing loss in 2005–2006 and similarly for [tex]\pi__{{88-94}}[/tex]. A 95% confidence interval for the parameter [tex]\pi__{{05-06}} }- \pi__{{88-94}}[/tex] turns out to be (0.0015, 0.0467).

Required:

What is an appropriate conclusion to draw?

Answer:

The appropriate conclusion is  

The sample data provide little evidence to doubt that the proportion of American teenagers with hearing loss was the same in 1988-1994 as in 2005-2006

Step-by-step explanation:

Generally the appropriate conclusion is

The sample data provide little evidence to doubt that the proportion of American teenagers with hearing loss was the same in 1988-1994 as in 2005-2006.

This because the confidence intervals are very close to zero , i.e both the upper limit and the lower limit are close to zero  and if we are take 0.05 as our level of significance we see that the both values of the confidence level are small to be significant