On the balance sheet of firm XYZ, the market value of the firm's asset is Vo = 100 million. The liability of XYZ consists of debt and equity; the debt is issued in the form of zero-coupon bonds, and the equity holders have the claim to the remaining of the firm's value after the debt holders are fully paid. The debt has face value F = 90 million. At maturity, the debt holders get paid before the equity holders. The debt has 1 year maturity. The continuously compounded expected growth rate of XYZ's asset is µ = 10%, with volatility o = 10%. The continuously compounded log risk-free rate is r = 5%. All terms are annualized. Suppose that the firm is liquidated after 1 year, i.e., the firm will not issue other products for financing. Compute the market prices of the debt and equity. (ii) Define the leverage ratio of the firm as the ratio of market values of debt and equity. What's the leverage ratio of firm XYZ?

Spar Company has calculated the Margin and Turnover ratios for one of its investment centers. The Margin ratio is 25%, and the Turnover ratio is 0.5 times. The Return on Investment (ROI) of this investment center can be determined by multiplying the Margin and Turnover ratios.

Let us calculate the ROI for Spar's investment center using the given formula: ROI = Margin × Turnover.ROI = 0.25 × 0.5ROI = 0.125 or 12.5%

Therefore, Spar Company's return on investment for this investment center is 12.5%.

This indicates that for every dollar invested in this investment center, the company is earning a return of 12.5 cents. The higher the ROI, the more efficient the investment center is in generating profits. The ROI of 12.5% is a good ROI, but it depends on the company's standards and expectations. If Spar Company has set higher standards for ROI, then this investment center's ROI is considered below par, and the company needs to take corrective actions.

Therefore, Spar Company has calculated the Margin and Turnover ratios for one of its investment centers. The Margin ratio is 25%, and the Turnover ratio is 0.5 times.

For more such questions on Margin and Turnover, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/14587383

#SPJ11

If Erin wants to double her money in 17 years, she must invest in nominal monthly compounding interest rate of 6.76% per annum.

To find out the nominal monthly compounding interest rate that Erin should look for to double her money in 17 years in an investment fund, we will use the following formula:

Future Value = Present Value x (1 + r/n)^(n x t),

where

We have to find the nominal monthly compounding interest rate.

Therefore, we will convert 17 years to months:

17 years = 17 x 12 months = 204 months

PV = 1r/n = r/12 (since Erin wants to know the nominal monthly compounding interest rate)

Now, substituting the values in the formula, we get:

2 PV = PV x (1 + r/12)^(12 x 204)2 = (1 + r/12)^(2,448)r/12 = 0.0056354

r = 0.0676 or 6.76%

Therefore, Erin should look for a nominal monthly compounding interest rate of 6.76% per annum to double her money in 17 years in an investment fund.

To know more about compound interest, visit https://brainly.com/question/28020457

#SPJ11

The correct option is that the call option with a market price of $75 has a lower premium than the call option with a market price of $80. 

A call option is an agreement where the owner of the option has the right to buy an underlying asset, which is typically a stock, at a predetermined price, which is known as the strike price, before the option contract expires.The premium for a call option is the price that the owner of the option must pay to buy the call option, which gives the owner the right to buy the underlying asset at the strike price.

The premium for a call option is based on various factors, including the underlying asset's market price, the strike price, the time until expiration, and the volatility of the underlying asset. The higher the market price of the underlying asset, the higher the premium for a call option.

On the other hand, if the market price of the underlying asset is low, then the premium for a call option will also be low. This is because the option is less likely to be exercised if the market price of the underlying asset is lower than the strike price. Therefore, in this case, the call option with a market price of $75 has a lower premium than the call option with a market price of $80, as the market price of the underlying asset for the first option is lower than the second option.

To know more about call visit :

brainly.com/question/31734180

#SPJ11

d) When P increases, the demand for tickets decreases.When the price of the ticket increases, the demand for tickets decreases. The inverse relationship is given in the demand function.option (d) is the false statement.

The given demand function is as follows :Q = 22328 − 0.41P + 0.5M − 0.33A + 100PDVD.

P = $5.50M = $9,000A = $900PDVD = $3.00.

Now we need to plug these values into the demand function to obtain the value of Q:

Q = 22328 − 0.41(5.5) + 0.5(9000) − 0.33(900) + 100(3)Q = 22328 − 2.255 + 4500 − 297 + 300Q = 27079.745 ≈ 27080.

The estimated monthly demand for tickets is 27080. Now, we will check which of the given statements is false.

a) When M increases, the demand for tickets increases.

b) When A decreases, the demand for tickets increases False. This statement is false. When advertising outlay decreases, the demand for tickets decreases. More advertising makes people aware of new movies and attracts them to the cinema.

c) When PDVD decreases, the demand for tickets increase False. This statement is true. When the price of DVD rental decreases, people tend to prefer DVDs over cinema.

Hence, the demand for tickets decreases.. This statement is false. When the price of the ticket increases, the demand for tickets decreases. The inverse relationship is given in the demand function.

To learn more about, Tickets, refer to; https://brainly.com/question/24746752

#SJP11

The economic rent earned by the low-cost producer is $1,275.

To calculate the economic rent earned by the low-cost producer, we need to compare its average total cost (ATC) with the market price.

Given that the low-cost producer's long-run total cost (LTC) is given by LTC = 150Q – 15Q² + 0.4Q², we can find its ATC by dividing LTC by the quantity produced (Q).

ATC = (150Q – 15Q² + 0.4Q³) / Q

= 150 – 15Q + 0.4Q²

The market price is given as $100.

To find the economic rent, we subtract the ATC from the market price and multiply it by the quantity produced (Q).

Economic Rent = (Market Price - ATC) * Q

= (100 - (150 - 15Q + 0.4Q²)) * Q

= (100 - 150 + 15Q - 0.4Q²) * Q

= (-50 + 15Q - 0.4Q²) * Q

= -0.4Q³ + 15Q² - 50Q

Substituting the given quantity (Q = 15) into the equation, we can find the economic rent

Economic Rent = -0.4(15)³ + 15(15)² - 50(15)

= -0.4(3375) + 15(225) - 750

= -1350 + 3375 - 750

= 1275

Therefore, the economic rent is $1,275.

To know more about economic rent:

https://brainly.com/question/4486116

#SPJ4

--The given question is incomplete, the complete question is given below "  In a perfectly competitive industry, there are two types of firms: low-cost producers and high-cost producers. The minimum average total cost of the high-cost producers is $150. The low-cost producers have a long-run total cost curve given by LTC = 150Q –15Q2 + 0.4Q2, where LMC = 150 – 30Q + 1.2Q2. How much economic rent does the low-cost producer earn? p = $100, q = 15"--

The seller would need to reduce her price using  elasticity of demand by $0.10 (10 cents) to increase the quantity sold by 20 percent.

To determine how much the seller would need to reduce her price to increase the quantity sold by 20 percent,

use the concept of elasticity of demand.

The formula to calculate the percentage change in quantity demanded given the percentage change in price is,

% Change in Quantity Demanded = Elasticity of Demand × % Change in Price

The elasticity of demand is 4, and we want to increase the quantity sold by 20 percent.

Plug in the values and solve for the percentage change in price,

20% = 4 × % Change in Price

Dividing both sides by 4 gives us,

% Change in Price

= 20% / 4

= 5%

To calculate the actual price reduction needed, multiply the current price by the percentage change in price,

Price Reduction

= $2 × 5%

= $0.10

Therefore, as per elasticity of demand the seller would need to reduce her price by $0.10 (10 cents) to increase the quantity sold by 20 percent.

learn more about elasticity here

brainly.com/question/30077891

#SPJ4

Given: Earnings per share next year = 3.81Retention ratio = 30%Equity cost of capital = expected return on new investment = 11%Earnings growth rate = 3.3% per year Dividend due in one year .

The Gordon growth model is given as: P = D1 / (Ke - g)where, P = current stock priced 1 = next year's dividend Ke = equity cost of capital g = earnings growth rate We can find out the value of D1 as:D1 = Earnings per share * Retention ratio[tex]D1 = 3.81 * 0.30D1 = $1.143Now we can find out the value of P as:P = D1 / (Ke - g)P = 1.143 / (0.11 - 0.033)P = $12.77[/tex]

Therefore, the current stock price of the firm is[tex]$12.77[/tex].

To know more about Earnings   visit:

brainly.com/question/24604517

#SPJ11

In accounting, gross profit is defined as the excess amount between revenue and cost of goods sold. The gross profit rate is calculated by dividing gross profit by revenue.

Gross profit rate can also be used to analyze the efficiency of a business by indicating the percentage of sales that contribute to the profit margin. Content loaded. Financial information is presented below:

The gross profit rate would be 0.34. 0.40. 0.36. 0.64.The given options for the gross profit rate are 0.34, 0.40, 0.36, and 0.64.

The gross profit rate can be calculated by dividing the gross profit by the revenue. There is no information about gross profit or revenue to calculate the gross profit rate.

Therefore, it is impossible to determine the correct answer based on the given information alone. So, the correct answer to the given question is indeterminable, i.e., cannot be determined.

Answer: The correct answer is indeterminable, i.e., cannot be determined.

To know more about gross profit visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29064762

#SPJ11

Increasing your OR ING leverage (increase in Fixed costs) usually involves an investment in fixed assets. One reason is to increase capacity to meet demand.

Another KEY reason to increase leverage is to improve profits.What is leverage?Leverage is the usage of borrowed money or financial instruments to amplify the potential gain or loss of an investment. An investor may utilize leverage to increase a portfolio's earning potential when the market is optimistic, and interest rates are low.

Increasing leverage aims to boost profits. To improve profits, increasing leverage is another KEY reason for the investment in fixed assets and increasing fixed costs. Therefore, the correct option is d. Improve profits.

To know more about leverage visit :

https://brainly.com/question/30469369

#SPJ11

According to sociologist Max Weber, charisma is a concept used to describe a unique and extraordinary quality possessed by certain individuals that enables them to exert a strong influence over others.

Charismatic leaders are characterized by their exceptional personal qualities, their ability to inspire and motivate others, and their ability to create a sense of devotion and loyalty among their followers.

Five types of behaviors commonly exhibited by charismatic leaders are:

Inspirational Communication: Charismatic leaders have the ability to articulate a compelling vision and communicate it in a way that captivates and inspires their followers.

Self-Confidence: Charismatic leaders exude a high level of self-assurance and belief in their own abilities.

Empathy: Charismatic leaders demonstrate a genuine concern and understanding for the needs and emotions of their followers.

Visionary Thinking: Charismatic leaders possess a clear and compelling vision for the future..

Personal Magnetism: Charismatic leaders possess a magnetic and captivating personality that attracts others to them.

These behaviors collectively contribute to the charismatic leader's ability to rally others around their cause, create a strong sense of identity and purpose.

To know more about charisma click here

brainly.com/question/30562354

#SPJ11

The required answer is $123.08.

Utility function of James is given by

`u(w) = w^0.5`.

We need to find the certainty equivalent for the following lottery.

The given lottery pays James:$2 with a probability 0.2$22 with a probability 0.3$26 otherwise expected value of this lottery is:

`0.2 × 2 + 0.3 × 22 + 0.5 × 26`= 0.4 + 6.6 + 13 = 20

James's Bernoulli utility function is u(w) = w^0.5

Therefore, the expected utility of the lottery is:

`0.2 × (2)^0.5 + 0.3 × (22)^0.5 + 0.5 × (26)^0.5`≈ 1.41 + 4.58 + 5.10 = 11.09

Now we need to find the amount of money that James would be willing to accept in lieu of the lottery. Let this amount be x, then according to the definition of certainty equivalent, we have

`u(x) = E[u(w)]`

Squaring both sides we get

`u(x)^2 = E[u(w)]^2`

Substituting the values of x and E[u(w)]

we get`x^0.5 = 11.09

`Squaring both sides, we get

`x = 11.09^2` = 123.08

Therefore, the certainty equivalent of the given lottery is $123.08 (rounded to two decimal places).

To know more about the Utility function, click here;

https://brainly.com/question/30652436

#SPJ11

Morelli Electric Motor Corporation manufactures three types of electric motors: standard, deluxe, and heavy-duty.

The company uses a job-order cost-accounting system with manufacturing overhead applied on the basis of direct-labor hours. The system has been in place with little change for 25 years.

The company's annual sales data are as follows:

Standard model: 19,000 units

Deluxe model: 1,500 units

Heavy-duty model: 9,400 units

The product costs for each model are as follows:

Raw material: $18

Direct labor: $10

Manufacturing overhead: $65

The total product cost for each model is as follows:

Standard model: $93

Deluxe model: $183

Heavy-duty model: $196

The predetermined overhead rate is calculated as follows:

Budgeted manufacturing overhead: $3,570,000

Budgeted direct-labor hours: 21,000 hours

Predetermined overhead rate: $170 per hour

The company's target price for each model is as follows:

Standard model: $110

Deluxe model: $220

Heavy-duty model: $232

The company is considering implementing an activity-based costing system. The activity cost pools and their drivers are as follows:

* Activity cost pool Driver

Depreciation, machinery | Machine hours

Maintenance, machinery | Machine hours

Depreciation, taxes, and insurance for factory | Square feet

Engineering | Number of engineering hours

Purchasing, receiving, and shipping | Number of purchase orders

Inspection and repair of defects | Number of defects

Material handling | Number of pounds of material

Miscellaneous manufacturing overhead costs | Number of direct-labor hours

The company is also considering changing its pricing formula to 110% of full product cost.

Read more about overhead rate here:

https://brainly.com/question/26372929

#SPJ4

Morelli Electric Motor Corporation Manufactures Electric Motors For Commercial Use. The Company Produces Three Models, Designated As Standard, Deluxe, And Heavy-Duty. The Company Uses A Job-Order Cost-Accounting System With Manufacturing Overhead Applied On The Basis Of Direct-Labor Hours. The System Has Been In Place With Little Change For 25 Years. Product

Morelli Electric Motor Corporation manufactures electric motors for commercial use. The company produces three models, designated as standard, deluxe, and heavy-duty. The company uses a job-order cost-accounting system with manufacturing overhead applied on the basis of direct-labor hours. The system has been in place with little change for 25 years. Product costs and annual sales data are as follows:

Standard Model Deluxe Model Heavy-Duty Model

Annual sales (units)  19,000    1,500    9,400  

Product costs:              

Raw material  $ 18    $ 33    $ 46  

Direct labor   10 (0.5 hr. at $20)   20 (1 hr. at $20)   20 (1 hr. at $20)

Manufacturing overhead*   65     130     130  

Total product cost  $ 93    $ 183    $ 196  

*The calculation of the predetermined overhead rate is as follows:

Given: Cost of the property = $3,500,000.LTV = 75%.Formula used:Debt to Equity Ratio = Total Debt / Total Equity.

Ann’s Debt to Equity ratio for this purchase can be calculated as follows:Total debt = (LTV / 100) × Cost of propertyTotal debt = (75 / 100) × $3,500,000Total debt = $2,625,000Total equity = Cost of property - Total debtTotal equity = $3,500,000 - $2,625,000Total equity = $875,000Debt to Equity Ratio = Total Debt / Total Equity Debt to Equity Ratio = $2,625,000 / $875,000Debt to Equity Ratio = 150 / 50 Debt to Equity Ratio = 3:1Therefore, the correct option is B. 3:1.

Learn more on debt here:

brainly.com/question/14010055

#SPJ11

The statement that "inflation is always and everywhere a fiscal phenomenon" is one of the most famous statements in economics.

The person who made this statement is Milton Friedman. Friedman was a Nobel Memorial Prize-winning economist and a leading advocate of monetarism, the view that a stable and low inflation rate is necessary for economic growth, employment, and prosperity. His statement is often interpreted to mean that inflation is primarily caused by monetary factors such as changes in the money supply, rather than real factors such as changes in the supply and demand for goods and services.  

To know more about inflation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28136474

#SPJ11

Sid's Hardware Store may be liable for breach of implied warranty of merchantability, but Dan's chances of winning are uncertain due to misuse.

For this situation, the suggested guarantee of merchantability would connect to the offer of the screwdriver to Bailey since Sid's Home improvement shop is a trader.

This guarantee ensures that the screwdriver is good for its normal reason and of satisfactory quality. In the event that the screwdriver was deficient or not reasonable for its planned use, Bailey would have a case under this guarantee.

Nonetheless, the guarantee may not stretch out to Dan since he acquired the screwdriver from Bailey and was not the first buyer. Dan's possibilities winning a suit against Sid's Home improvement shop for break of guarantee are unsure as he is an outsider to the first deal.

Sid's Home improvement shop might actually contend the protection of abuse of the item. Dan involved the screwdriver as an etch and exposed it to exorbitant power with a demo hammer, which was not its planned use.

The store might battle that the injury came about because of Dan's carelessness or abuse, as opposed to a deformity in the screwdriver. The result of the claim would rely upon the particular conditions and proof introduced.

To learn more about merchantability warranty, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/30925143

#SPJ4

If the production function features increasing returns to scale producing a higher quantity, it reduces the average cost of production.

The correct option is c) . reduces the average cost of production.

The increasing returns to scale imply that an increase in the input leads to a more than proportional increase in output. Thus, as the production level rises, the total cost of production does not increase proportionally, resulting in a decline in average cost of production.

When production increases, it leads to economies of scale. Economies of scale happen when there is an increase in production, and it results in a decrease in the cost of production per unit. This is because the cost of producing each unit of output falls as the number of units produced rises. Thus, the average cost of production falls as production increases with increasing returns to scale.

To know more about average cost visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14415150

#SPJ11

The adjustment entry involves increasing the allowance to reflect the estimated bad debts expense. In this case, the estimated bad debts expense is 2% of the outstanding accounts receivable.

a) Transaction (a):

General Journal

Debit: Bad Debts Expense $1,030

Credit: Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $1,030

Explanation:

Since the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts has a $415 credit balance before the adjustment and the company estimates that 2% of the outstanding accounts receivable will be uncollectible, we need to adjust the allowance by the estimated amount.

The adjustment entry involves increasing the allowance to reflect the estimated bad debts expense. In this case, the estimated bad debts expense is 2% of the outstanding accounts receivable.

2% of $55,000 = $1,100

However, since the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts has a credit balance of $415, we only need to increase it by the net amount.

$1,100 - $415 = $685

To record this adjustment:

Debit the Bad Debts Expense account for $1,030 to increase the expense.

Credit the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts account for $1,030 to increase the allowance.

Please note that the amounts in the adjusting entry are derived based on the information provided in the question and the assumption that the allowance account balance before the adjustment is $415 credit.

b) Transaction (b):

General Journal

Debit: Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $1,100

Credit: Bad Debts Expense $1,100

Explanation:

Since the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts has a $291 debit balance before the adjustment, we need to adjust the allowance to reflect the estimated bad debts expense. The estimated bad debts expense is 2% of the outstanding accounts receivable, which is calculated as follows:

2% of $55,000 = $1,100

To record this adjustment:

Debit the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts account for $1,100 to increase the allowance.

Credit the Bad Debts Expense account for $1,100 to record the expense.

Please note that the amounts in the adjusting entry are derived based on the information provided in the question and the assumption that the allowance account balance before the adjustment is $291 debit.

To know more about bad debts follow the link:

https://brainly.com/question/18721587

#SPJ4

If Dave and Charlotte observe the cat purring, payoff matrix their posterior belief is 0.389 for Nice and 0.611 for Mean.

a. To find the Bayesian-Nash balance, we want to decide the procedures that augment the normal utility for every player, given their convictions about the feline's kind. We should think about the two potential sorts of the feline: Pleasant (N) and Mean (M).

For Dave and Charlotte:

On the off chance that they take on the feline (A), their normal settlements are:

E[Dave(A)] = P(N) * 64 + P(M) * (-58)

E[Charlotte(A)] = P(N) * 5 + P(M) * (-44)

On the off chance that they don't take on the feline (N), their normal adjustments are:

E[Dave(N)] = P(N) * (-34) + P(M) * 18.5

E[Charlotte(N)] = P(N) * (-20) + P(M) * (-26.5)

To find the Bayesian-Nash balance, we want to compute the likelihood dissemination P(N) that makes Dave and Charlotte unconcerned between taking on or not embracing the feline.

Setting E[Dave(A)] = E[Dave(N)] and E[Charlotte(A)] = E[Charlotte(N)], we get:

P(N) * (64-34) + P(M) * (-58) = P(N) * (-20) + P(M) * 18.5

P(N) * (5-20) + P(M) * (-44) = P(N) * (-20) + P(M) * (-26.5)

Improving on the above conditions, we have:

30P(N) - 56P(M) = 0

19P(N) + 17.5P(M) = 0

Addressing these conditions all the while, we find:

P(N) = 0.3889 (around)

P(M) = 0.6111 (around)

Consequently, the Bayesian-Nash balance is:

Dave and Charlotte ought to embrace the feline with likelihood 0.3889 in the event that they notice the feline murmuring and with likelihood 0.6111 assuming they notice the feline murmuring.

b. To compute Dave and Charlotte's back convictions, we utilize Bayes' hypothesis. How about we accept that Dave and Charlotte at first doled out equivalent earlier probabilities to the feline being Great or Mean, i.e., P(N) = P(M) = 0.5.

Assuming Dave and Charlotte see that the feline murmurs, their back conviction that the feline is Pleasant can be determined as follows:

P(N|Purr) = (P(Purr|N) * P(N))/(P(Purr|N) * P(N) + P(Purr|M) * P(M))

P(N|Purr) = (0.3889 * 0.5)/(0.3889 * 0.5 + 0.6111 * 0.5)

P(N|Purr) = 0.3889/1

Consequently, their back conviction that the feline is Great, considering that it murmurs, is 0.3889 or roughly 0.389.

Also, their back conviction that the feline is Mean, considering that it murmurs, is:

P(M|Purr) = 1-P(N|Purr)

P(M|Purr) = 1-0.3889

P(M|Purr) = 0.6111 or roughly 0.611.

In outline, assuming Dave and Charlotte see that the feline murmurs, their back conviction that the feline is Pleasant is roughly 0.389, and their back conviction that it is Mean is around 0.611.

To learn more about payoff matrix, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/30726502

#SPJ4

(i) The endogeneity problem in studying this problem arises because of the potential correlation between the decision to forgive the first-time offender and the likelihood of committing a future crime.

(ii) A suitable econometric method in this setting would be a difference-in-differences (DD) approach.

(iii) In the DD approach, we compare the change in the future crime rate of those who received a warning for a drug-related crime (the treatment group) before and after the warning, with the change in the future crime rate of those who were charged and convicted of the crime (the control group) over the same time period.

(iv) The parallel trends assumption can be tested visually with a graph of the pre-treatment period crime rates for both the treatment and control groups.

For example, if a certain group of minors are more likely to receive a warning instead of being charged, it could be because they live in a wealthier neighbourhood, have parents who are well-connected or for some other reason make it less likely they will commit crimes in the future. Thus, a failure to account for such factors can lead to biased estimates of the effect of forgiveness on future crime rates.

In the DD approach, we compare the change in the future crime rate of those who received a warning for a drug-related crime (the treatment group) before and after the warning, with the change in the future crime rate of those who were charged and convicted of the crime (the control group) over the same time period. The identifying assumption of this method is the parallel trends assumption, which means that in the absence of the warning, the treatment and control groups would have had the same trend in future crime rates.

If the treatment and control groups have similar pre-treatment trends, it provides some evidence in support of the assumption. Additionally, we can estimate the DD model and test for the significance of the interaction term between the treatment indicator and time dummies. If the interaction term is statistically significant, it suggests that the parallel trends assumption may not hold. We can also conduct a placebo test by setting the treatment period to be before the policy change and ensure that there is no significant difference in crime rates between the treatment and control groups during the placebo period.

Learn more about the endogeneity problem here:

https://brainly.com/question/31951952

#SPJ4

If the company has a target profit of $560,000, the selling price per unit using the variable cost method is $420.

To compute the selling price per unit using the variable cost method, we need to consider the variable costs and the target profit.

The variable costs per unit include direct materials, direct labor, variable overhead, and variable selling, general, and administrative costs. Adding these costs together, we get:

Variable costs per unit = Direct materials + Direct labor + Variable overhead + Variable selling, general, and administrative costs

= $150 + $55 + $65 + $30

= $300

Next, we need to determine the total fixed costs. The fixed costs include fixed overhead costs and fixed selling, general, and administrative costs. Adding these costs together, we get:

Total fixed costs = Fixed overhead costs + Fixed selling, general, and administrative costs

= $285,000 + $355,000

= $640,000

Now, we can calculate the total cost per unit by adding the variable costs per unit and the fixed costs per unit:

Total cost per unit = Variable costs per unit + (Total fixed costs / Number of units)

= $300 + ($640,000 / 10,000)

= $300 + $64

= $364

Finally, we can compute the selling price per unit using the formula:

Selling price per unit = Total cost per unit + Target profit per unit

= $364 + ($560,000 / 10,000)

= $364 + $56

= $420

This price covers the variable costs per unit, the fixed costs per unit, and achieves the target profit of $560,000.

To learn more about selling price click on,

https://brainly.com/question/31624954

#SPJ4

Benitez Security Systems should order 70 units of camera security systems. The total cost based on EOQ is approximately $121,039.29. If the owner orders 300 units, they can get a 2% discount on the item cost, resulting in a total cost of $118,628.58. The optimal inventory policy is to maintain a stock of 70 units.

To determine the ordering amount based on the Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) model, we need to use the following formula:

EOQ = √((2 * D * S) / H)

Where:

D = Annual demand (1200 units)

S = Ordering cost ($30 per order)

H = Carrying cost rate (15% of the item cost)

Let's calculate the EOQ:

EOQ = √((2 * 1200 * 30) / (0.15 * 100))

EOQ = √(72000 / 15)

EOQ ≈ √4800

EOQ ≈ 69.28

Since we can't order a fraction of a unit, we should round up to the nearest whole number.

Ordering amount based on EOQ: Q = 70 units

Now let's calculate the total costs based on the EOQ.

Total Cost = (D / Q) * S + (Q / 2) * H + D * C

Where:

D = Annual demand (1200 units)

Q = Ordering amount (70 units)

S = Ordering cost ($30 per order)

H = Carrying cost rate (15% of the item cost)

C = Item cost ($100)

Total Cost = (1200 / 70) * 30 + (70 / 2) * 0.15 * 100 + 1200 * 100

= 514.29 + 525 + 120000

= $121039.29

Now let's calculate the total costs if they take the discount.

Discounted item cost = Item cost - (Item cost * Discount rate)

= $100 - ($100 * 0.02)

= $100 - $2

= $98

Total Cost with discount = (D / Q) * S + (Q / 2) * H + D * Discounted item cost

= (1200 / 70) * 30 + (70 / 2) * 0.15 * 98 + 1200 * 98

= 514.29 + 514.29 + 117600

= $118628.58

Therefore, the optimal inventory policy based on the EOQ is:

Q = 70 units

To learn more about cost follow the link:

https://brainly.com/question/17120857

#SPJ4

The complete question is:

Benitez Security Systems has an annual demand for a camera security system of 1200 units. The cost of the camera system is $100. Carrying cost rate is estimated at 15%, and the ordering cost is $30 per order. If the owner orders 300 she can get a 2% discount on the cost of the cameras. The company operates 300 days per year, therefore the daily demand is 4 units per day and

the lead time to receive an order from the supplier is 5 days.

What should be their ordering amount based on EOQ?

What are the total costs based on E0Q?

What are the total costs if they take the discount?

Adjustment is a personality dimensions that is typically associated with a person being non-depressed, secure, and content. The correct option is B.

The personality dimension typically associated with a person being non-depressed, secure, and content is "adjustment." Adjustment refers to an individual's emotional stability, resilience, and ability to cope with stress. People with high levels of adjustment tend to have a positive outlook, exhibit emotional well-being, and are less prone to experiencing depression or anxiety.

They are secure in themselves and their environment, displaying a sense of contentment. In contrast, individuals with lower levels of adjustment may be more susceptible to negative emotions, insecurity, and dissatisfaction. Therefore, when it comes to being nondepressed, secure, and content, the personality dimension of adjustment plays a significant role.

The correct option is B.

To know more about personality dimensions, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/31756524

#SPJ4

Candace Co.

Bank Reconciliation

May 31

Cash balance according to bank statement $4,333

Adjustments:

Bank service charge: -$72

Deposits in transit not recorded by bank: +$1,021

Error in recording check: +$9 ([$37 - $28])

Total adjustments: $958

Adjusted balance: $5,291 ($4,333 + $958)

Cash balance according to company's records $4,601

Adjustments:

Deposits in transit not recorded by bank: +$1,021

Error in recording check: +$9 ([$37 - $28])

Outstanding checks: -$834

Total adjustments: $196

Adjusted balance: $4,797 ($4,601 + $196)

To prepare the bank reconciliation for Candace Co. on May 31, we need to compare the cash balance according to the bank statement with the cash balance according to the company's records and make adjustments for any discrepancies.

Cash balance according to the bank statement is given as $4,333.

Adjustments:

Bank service charge: The bank service charge is listed as -$72. This amount needs to be deducted from the bank statement balance.

Deposits in transit not recorded by bank: The deposits in transit, which are $1,021, have not been recorded by the bank yet. Therefore, we need to add this amount to the bank statement balance.

Error in recording check: There is an error in recording a check for supplies. The check was recorded as $28 in the ledger, but it should be $37. The difference is $9, and we need to add this amount to the bank statement balance.

Total adjustments: The total adjustments are the sum of the adjustments mentioned above, which is $958.

Adjusted balance: The adjusted balance is calculated by adding the total adjustments to the cash balance according to the bank statement. Thus, the adjusted balance is $5,291 ($4,333 + $958).

Cash balance according to the company's records is given as $4,601.

Adjustments:

Deposits in transit not recorded by bank: The deposits in transit, which are $1,021, have not been recorded by the bank yet. Therefore, we need to add this amount to the company's cash balance.

Error in recording check: There is an error in recording a check for supplies. The check was recorded as $28 in the ledger, but it should be $37. The difference is $9, and we need to add this amount to the company's cash balance.

Outstanding checks: Outstanding checks amount to $834. These checks have been issued by the company but have not been cleared by the bank yet. Thus, we need to subtract this amount from the company's cash balance.

Total adjustments: The total adjustments are the sum of the adjustments mentioned above, which is $196.

Adjusted balance: The adjusted balance is calculated by adding the total adjustments to the cash balance according to the company's records. Therefore, the adjusted balance is $4,797 ($4,601 + $196).

By comparing the adjusted balances, we can see that there is a discrepancy between the bank and company's cash balances. Further investigation may be required to reconcile the difference.

For more questions on bank statement

https://brainly.com/question/15525383

#SPJ8

The incorrect statement is, Private fleets primarily transport products owned by their organization or are owned by other members of their supply chain. Option D is the answer.

Private carriage refers to the transportation of goods by a company's own fleet or by hiring third-party carriers exclusively for their own use. Private fleets can transport products owned by their organization, but they generally do not transport products owned by other members of their supply chain.

Private carriage is distinct from common carriage, where transportation services are offered to the general public. Private carriage allows companies to have control over their transportation operations and tailor them to their specific needs. It is important to accurately understand the scope of private carriage, which typically involves the organization's products and not products owned by others in the supply chain. Option D is the answer.

To know more about carriage, here

https://brainly.com/question/28372537

#SPJ4

When, firm's debt will be priced at par, so the market value of its debt equal to its book value. Then, the Edelman Engines' EV/EBITDA ratio is approximately 16.06.

To calculate Edelman Engines' market/book ratio, we need to determine the market value and book value of its equity.

Market value of equity = Number of shares outstanding × Stock price

Market value of equity = 400 million × $24

Market value of equity = $9.6 billion

Book value of equity = Total assets - Total liabilities

Book value of equity = $20 billion - ($3 billion + $9 billion)

Book value of equity = $8 billion

Market/book ratio = Market value of equity / Book value of equity

Market/book ratio = $9.6 billion / $8 billion

Market/book ratio = 1.2

Therefore, Edelman Engines' market/book ratio is 1.2.

To calculate Edelman Engines' EV/EBITDA ratio, we need to determine its enterprise value (EV) and EBITDA.

Enterprise value (EV) = Market value of equity + Total debt - Cash and equivalents

EV = $9.6 billion + $9 billion - $90 million

EV = $18.51 billion

EV/EBITDA ratio = Enterprise value (EV) / EBITDA

EV/EBITDA ratio = $18.51 billion / $1.152 billion

EV/EBITDA ratio = 16.06

Therefore, Edelman Engines' EV/EBITDA ratio will be 16.06.

To know more about enterprise value here

https://brainly.com/question/31577117

#SPJ4

The total deposit made for the period of six years can be computed as P5400*12*6 = P3,10,800. The number of months between the time the deposit stopped and when it resumed is four years * 12 months = 48 months.

The total amount withdrawn from the establishment of the belt and nuts factory is P2,300*48 = P1,10,400. In order to find the total deposit made over the period of six years, the monthly deposit made must be multiplied by the number of months in six years.P5400 is deposited monthly, therefore the total deposit made is P5400*12*6 = P3,10,800.When the deposit stopped after the sixth year, a period of four years went by before it was resumed.

Four years is equivalent to 48 months, thus, the total number of months the deposit was not made was 48 months.At the point of resuming the deposit, the establishment of a belt and nuts factory was created, which required the monthly withdrawal of P2,300. Therefore, the total amount withdrawn is P2,300*48 = P1,10,400.

To know more about total deposit visit:

https://brainly.com/question/6596750

#SPJ11

The top-level executive task of crafting a diversified company's overall or corporate strategy does not include day-to-day operational management.

Day-to-day operational management is not part of the top-level executive task of crafting a diversified company's overall or corporate strategy. While the executives are responsible for developing and implementing the company's strategic direction, their focus is on long-term goals, vision, and objectives. They analyze market trends, assess opportunities and risks, set performance targets, allocate resources, and make key strategic decisions.

However, the actual management of daily operations, such as overseeing production processes, monitoring employee performance, or managing customer service, is typically delegated to middle or lower-level managers. The top-level executives concentrate on shaping the company's strategic direction rather than engaging in operational details.

Learn more about customer service here: brainly.com/question/28098450

#SPJ11

If the finance department is going over budget due to an exigency in the campus event, there are a few potential implications.

First, the unexpected expenses incurred for the event may exceed the allocated budget, leading to a shortfall in available funds. This could result in the need to reallocate funds from other areas or seek additional funding to cover the deficit. Second, the over-budget situation may impact the overall financial performance of the organization, potentially affecting its financial statements and reporting. It is important for the finance department to address the issue promptly, assess the impact on the overall financial picture, and take necessary steps to mitigate any negative consequences. If the finance department is going over budget due to an exigency in the campus event, there are a few potential implications.

Learn more about over budget here:

https://brainly.com/question/20377694

#SPJ11

The law of demand states that, ceteris paribus (all other factors remaining constant), there is an inverse relationship between the price of a good or service and the quantity demanded. In other words, as the price of a product increases, the quantity demanded decreases, and vice versa.

The law of supply, on the other hand, states that, ceteris paribus, there is a direct relationship between the price of a good or service and the quantity supplied. As the price of a product increases, the quantity supplied also increases, and vice versa.

Price factor affecting demand:

Price of the product: Changes in the price of a product directly impact its demand. When the price of a product decreases, the demand for that product generally increases, and when the price increases, the demand decreases.

Non-price factors affecting demand (examples):

Consumer income: The income of consumers is a crucial factor that affects the demand for goods and services. Higher income levels often lead to increased purchasing power and a greater demand for various products. For example, if individuals experience an increase in their disposable income, they may be more willing to purchase luxury goods or engage in leisure activities.

Consumer preferences and tastes: Consumer preferences and tastes play a significant role in shaping the demand for goods and services. Changes in trends, fashion, and consumer preferences can lead to shifts in demand. For example, a growing preference for healthier food options may increase the demand for organic or plant-based food products.

Availability of substitutes: The availability of substitutes impacts the demand for a particular product. When more substitutes are available, consumers have more options to choose from, which can influence their purchasing decisions. For instance, if the price of a particular brand of cell phone increases significantly, consumers may opt for a different brand or choose to purchase a different electronic device altogether.

Consumer expectations: Consumer expectations about future prices, income levels, or economic conditions can affect their current demand. If consumers anticipate future price increases, they may be motivated to purchase the product at the present price, leading to an increase in current demand. Similarly, if consumers expect their income to decrease, they may reduce their current demand for certain goods and services.

It is important to note that these factors do not act independently but often interact with each other, influencing the overall demand for goods and services in the market.

To know more about   demand. here

https://brainly.com/question/1245771

#SPJ11

The value of Samsung's preferred stock is $22.To calculate the value of Samsung's preferred stock, we can use the formula for the present value of perpetuity. The formula is as follows:

Value of preferred stock = Dividend / Required return

In this case, the dividend is the constant annual dividend of $2.2, and the required return is 10% (0.10 in decimal form).

Value of Samsung's preferred stock = $2.2 / 0.10 = $22

Therefore, the value of Samsung's preferred stock is $22.

To know more about Dividend visit-

brainly.com/question/30030205

#SPJ11