need help with this :)))))))

Answer:

hello want to be friends so i can join you and you can join me

Answer:

I think it would be no solution

Step-by-step explanation:

since there is the same slope, the line would never cross. Also the determinate is 0 or 1/0, so there would be no solution

Answer:

  28y^3 -35y^5

Step-by-step explanation:

  = 7y^3(4) -7y^3(5y^2)

  = 28y^3 -35y^5

_____

The applicable rule of exponents is ...

  (y^a)(y^b) = y^(a+b)

Concept:- In mixed fractions, we will have one whole number and a proper fraction. So, first we should convert them into improper fractions, which has the numerator greater than the denominator. After, converting to that we should convert the unlike fractions to like fractions by the method of LCM of denominators. Then, we can sub all the fractions so that we can get the answer.

Explanation:

{8(9/10)} - {3(2/3)}

Convert all mixed fractions to proper fractions.

= {(80+9)/10} - {(9+2)/3}

Now, add the both numerators.

= (89/10) - (11/3)

LCM of 10 & 3 is 30.

= {(89*3)/(10*3)} - {(11*10)/(3*10)}

Now, multiply the numerator and denominator of all fractions.

= (267/30) - (110/30)

Write all numerators with common denominator.

= {(267-110)/30}

Subtract the fraction and write it in simplest form.

= 157/30

Write the obtained answer in the form of mixed fraction.

= {5(7/30)}.

also read similar questions: 5/7 + 3 2/5 = 5/9 + 2 4/7 = 6 2/6 + 4/11 = 10 2/3 + 5 1/4 = 9 1/2 + ....

https://brainly.com/question/25595033?referrer

The number of years it would take an investment to triple with continuous compounding is 1.356 years.

The formula for calculating future value of an investment when there is continuous compounding is FV = A x [tex]e^{r}[/tex] x N

Where:

N = log(3) / log(e) / 0.81 = 1.356 years

To learn more about future value, please check: https://brainly.com/question/14640433

Answer:

D. 0.343

Step-by-step explanation:

You can see the first three options as 0.340 so if you substract this number with 0.343 the remainder is positive 3.

This strategy also can be applied to the number 0.3409 but in this occasion the result is different:

[tex]0.343 - 0.3409 = 2.1\times 10^{-3}[/tex]

That is small number but still is positive that's meaning that between 0.343 and 0.3409 the greatest value is 0.343 .

Answer:

7feet I hope this help you.

Answer:

the prime numbers between 30 and 59 are 31, 37, 41, 43, 47, 53

[tex]\begin{array}{cccccccc}\\ \underline{-3}&,&12&,&-33&,&102\\ \cline{1-7} &&(-3)(\underline{-3})+3&&(-3)(12)+3&&(-3)(-33)+3 \end{array} \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill\\\\ \begin{array}{ccc} -303&,&912\\ \cline{1-3} (-3)(102)+3&&(-3)(-303)+3 \end{array}[/tex]

Answer: 1300

Step-by-step explanation:

3300-1000=2000

2000-450=1550

1550-150=1400

1400-100=1300

Answer:

40,000

Step-by-step explanation:

The value of 352914 to the nearest hundred thousand is 400,000

To approximate a number means to write a number near the original number that is a number, not exactly the original number. It may be a bit more or less than the original.

For example 345 is called three hundred and forty five, this means that 3 is hundred , 4 is tens and 5 is units. When approximating we round up the next number to 1 if ≥ 5 and to 0 if ≤ 5.

Therefore, 352914 approximated  to the nearest hundred thousand will be  400, 000 because the number after 3 is 5 it will be rounded to 1 and added to 3.

learn more about approximation from

https://brainly.com/question/28802280

#SPJ3

Answer:

B. -111

Step-by-step explanation:

y = -4x^2 - 3x + 4

x = 5

y = -4(5)^2 - 3(5) + 4

y = -4(25) - 15 + 4

y = -100 - 15 + 4

y = -111

...............................................................................................................................................

Please, write -4x^2 (not 04x2).

Then the quadratic model is y = -4x^2 - 3x + 4.

Now substitute 5 for x:  y(5) = -4 (5)^2 - 3(5) + 4

Simplifying,                     y(5) = -4(25) - 15 + 4 = -100 - 11 = -111.

Binary predictors are simply used to represent dummy variables in regression.

The statement that the nine categories can be coded by nine binary predictors is false.

Binary predictors can only take any of the two binary values (0 and 1).

This means that, the nine categories cannot be represented using binary values or predictors

This is so because, the number of categories (9) is greater than the number of predictors (2).

Hence, the given statement is false

Read more about binary predictors at:

https://brainly.com/question/7361586

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Exact Form:

C=23/24

Decimal Form:

C=0.9583

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

an estimate would be 2000/4 so it would be 500

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helped <3

Answer:

a. 36

b. 8.5 (8 1/2)

c. 2/5

d. 6

e. 9

f. 8

Step-by-step explanation:

a. 36

b. 8.5 (8 1/2)

c. 2/5

d. 6

e. 9

f. 8

Step-by-step explanation:

28 / 4 = 7

7 + 3 = 10

so, 10 is your answer

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

28 ÷ 4 = 7

7 + 3= 10

Answer:

∠RQT = 23.5

∠PQR  = 133°

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1 - Add angles together:

As all angles on a straight line must add up to 180°:

3x - 5 + x + 1 = 180

Add like terms together

3x + x - 5 + 1

4x - 4 = 180

Step 2 - Add 4 to both sides of the equation:

4x - 4 + 4 = 180 + 4

4x = 184

Step 3 - Divide both sides by 4:

[tex]\frac{4x}{4} = \frac{184}{4}[/tex]

x = 46

∠RQS = x + 1

∠RQS = 46 + 1

∠RQS = 47

Given the ray QT bisects ∠RQS, the angles must be the same on either side so:

47 ÷ 2 = ∠RQT

∠RQT = 23.5

As we know the value of x:

∠PQR = 3x - 5

Plug known values in:

3x - 5

3(46) - 5

138 - 5

∠PQR  = 133°

This can also be calculated by subtracting known angle ∠RQS from 180:

180 - 47 = 133.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

Isoceles and obtuse

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

i think its c

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

c

Step-by-step explanation:

because -100,-57/8,6

the absolute value of -6 is 6 and

-8 7/8 is 8×(-8)+7=-64+7/8=-57/8 because when negative plus positive we subtract and we take the sign of the larger number

Answer:

6/8

Step-by-step explanation:

you have to convert each fraction into an improper. because the denominators are already the same, you dont have to worry. once you have it as an impropper, you can now subtract it. 19/8 - 13/8 = 6/8

reduce if you can

Answer:

because the total is 300 not 100 so 50 is not reasonable because that is the percentage they planted and since it is more than 100 then it should be a percent of 300 not 100. Maya is wrong about placing 50 bulbs instead they placed 150.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:10

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

35

Step-by-step explanation:

since i couldn't answer before

Answer: 4.6

Step-by-step explanation: let the missing length be x

2+2+4.8+4.8+4.8+4.8+.4.8+x=32.6

28+x=32.6

x=32.6-28

x=4.6

Answer: at least 50 dollars

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

Cross-multiply to find x:

Answer:

4) 2=4x-3y

5) 51=21x-3y

Step-by-step explanation:

I gave it my best shot, I used fraction busters to cancel out the fractions and then I used simple math and distributive property. Hope it helps.

Answer:

Harper would take the Total Bill after tax and mutiply it by 0.16.

The formula for this would be

Total Bill = x

Tip = 16% -> 16/100 = 0.16

So

0.16x