Answer:
The answer is C
Explanation:
no sir we don't do that here
To have a fair trial, juries must be a fair cross-section of the community. This most nearly means:
A. the community votes on jury members
B. the jury must reflect the surrounding community in gender, race, color, religion, and ethnic background
C. the jury must reflect must consist of family members from the defendant and plaintiff.
D. the jury must be the same race as the defendant
Answer:
B. the jury must reflect the surrounding community in gender, race, color, religion, and ethnic background
Explanation:
Because it needs to be around your community
pros and cons of being a federalist
pros
creates a sense of local patriotism
provides a better level of stability from a political perspective
It encourages involvement
It lessens the bureaucracy.
cons
It creates confusion.
It encourages governments to “pass the buck.”
It stops national policies from being implemented.
It causes uncertainty.
This one depends on your pov
It creates a wealth gap.
When a bill has passed Congress, and is ready for Presidential consideration, it is said to be which of the following?
OA. Debated
OB. Enrolled
Ос.
Amended
OD. Proposed
Answer:
B) Enrolled.
Explanation:
Answer:
Enrolled
Explanation:
I took the quiz. Im in k12.
Do we have to pay to be rescued? What if you get attacked by a bear on a hike, and you have to be rescued! Do you have to pay for the rescue? Why? or Why not? agree or disagree! What if you make a mistake why 'll you are on a boat ride! Should you pay to be rescued? Linda Perez-Alcover. Oet 15
4. When passing another vehicle, it is safe to return to your lane if your"
Explanation:
Before returning to your original lane after passing, you must make sure you are not dangerously close to the vehicle you have just passed. When you can see both of the vehicle's headlights in your rearview mirror, you may have enough room to return to the lane.
While the car is in motion, it's only safe for _____ to interact with GPS.
A. an adult
B. the driver
C. a passenger
D. a driver over 21
Answer:
D
Explanation:
kasi yon ang alam ko HAHAHAHA
Because they were ___________, Quakers in Pennsylvania refused to go to war against the French.
Answer:
나는 당신이 답을 찾는 행운을 빕니다
Explanation:
미안해 너를 속였다
Changes to laws and punishments for drug crimes that began in the 1980s include _____.an expansion of what constitutes a drug crime
more opportunities for acquittal
longer sentences for drug crimes
more serious punishments for drug crimes
PLS ANSWER ASAP
Changes to laws and punishments for drug crimes that began in the 1980s include "more serious punishments for drug crimes" (Option E)
What is Drug Crime?A drug-related crime involves the possession, production, or distribution of narcotics with the potential for abuse.
Drugs are also associated with crime since drug trafficking and manufacturing are frequently controlled by drug cartels, organized crime, and gangs.
The Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 was passed by the United States House of Representatives and Senate in order to intensify Federal efforts to foster international drug law enforcement cooperation, improve enforcement of U.S. drug laws, enhance interdiction efforts, and to provide leadership in developing drug abuse deterrence.
Learn more about Drugs:
https://brainly.com/question/26254731
#SPJ1
Answer: an expansion of what constitutes a drug crime and more serious punishments for drug crimes
Explanation: had to put 2 so got it wrong on edge
A man was arguing with a police officer and was shot in the stomach. Though he lost consciousness, he continued struggling with the officer while unconscious, causing the policeman’s gun to discharge. The police officer’s gunshot the police officer who died right away (adapted from People v. Newton).
WOULD THE UNCONSCIOUS MAN’S ACTIONS BE CONSIDERED VOLUNTARY (ACTION UNDER HIS CONTROL) OR INVOLUNTARY(ACTION NOT UNDER HIS CONTROL)? WHY?
WILL HE BE CONVICTED OF HOMICIDE?
Answer:
This is a bit complex. According to the case, People v. Newton the petitioner did not subject himself to criminal liability by virtue of a voluntary act. Therefore, the unconscious man's actions would be considered voluntary simply because he was operating his weapon. Moreover, he will not be convicted of homicide.
Explanation:
Here are four historical documents or decisions related to the rule of law. Use their time periods to number them from 1 to 4.
Magna Carta
Marbury v. Madison
U.S. Constitution
Politics
explain the difference between personal injury protection and property damage liability insurance
What makes the Magna Carta a significant document?
Answer:
Its important because it influenced the constituition that we have today, not only that but it created no one else to be above the law including the King at the time.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!!
A current vehicle registration expires at _____ of the first owner listed on the registration form.
Answer:
"midnight of the day of birth of the owner."
Explanation:
I've seen some phrases deviate a bit.
Answer:
C. midnight on the birthday
Explanation:
All are done a couple of days after birth to minimize stress except?
O iron shot
O clip needle teeth
O dock tail
O slaughter
possible outcomes when senators vote?
Lethal force is limited to the use of a firearm.
A. True
B. False
Answer:
B. false
,.............
....,
Answer:
B. False
Explanation:
In most jurisdictions, the use of deadly force is justified only under conditions of extreme necessity as a last resort, when all lesser means have failed or cannot reasonably be employed. Firearms, bladed weapons, explosives, and vehicles are among those weapons the use of, which is considered deadly force.
what are the pros and cons of Trump and Biden?
Answer:
Biden 2020
Explanation:
Because Biden is cool
Answer:
Biden
Explanation:
Trump says absurd things.
Biden is alittle odd.
Trump has done somthings that are accually beneficial to the us.
Biden wants to make the country whole again.
Why does the Lincoln Project think provoking President Trump is a good idea?
Explanation:
They’re all made by the Lincoln Project, a political action committee led by high-profile Republicans who want to topple Trump, using firepower they’ve previously trained on Democrats.
And over the course of the last year, the group has moved from an insidery novelty to an online sensation to one that is raising real money. It might have a meaningful effect on this fall’s election.
Emphasis on “might.” The Lincoln Project’s strategy and tactics are a moving target, so it’s hard to get a grip on what it’s really doing and whether it will work. But the group most definitely has the attention of political insiders — some think it could be a useful ally to Joe Biden and actual Democrats; others suggest that it’s not much more than a publicity stunt. Either way, the Lincoln Project has your attention, whether you realize it or not.
Honest question... if I’m 16 or 17 and want to live with my older sister who is 23, can I? My parents gave me permission, I have a job and I’m gonna help with rent for our apartment. So how would the landlords know my parents gave permission without court involved? My sister has 2 jobs and I’m online schooling and I have a job as well we both will help with rents and other necessities. But how will the landlords know we are not lying? How do they know without court involved? Please..
Why should Amy Coney Barrett be confirmed to become the next Associate Supreme Court Justice? Pleaseeee helpppp!
Answer:
Explanation:
Because she was confirmed by the Senate. All official proceedings were done and once they were done, she was confirmed by a majority vote and therefore, can assume the position.
what is multi party system
Answer:
a system with more than one political party
Explanation:
for example the USA has both a Republican and Democratic party along with green
Answer:
where there are a number of national as well as regional parties. A regional party may gain a majority and rule a particular state. If a party is represented in more than 4 states, it would be labelled a national party.
What is a law in question ?
Answer:
In law, a question of law, also known as a point of law, is a question that must be answered by applying relevant legal principles to interpretation of the law. Such a question is distinct from a question of fact, which must be answered by reference to facts and evidence as well inferences arising from those facts.
Explanation:
brainliest?
Is it enough to be “suspected” of terrorism, or should these suspects have the right to a fair trial before being detained indefinitely?
* This is for Criminal Justice *
A man left his wife when he found out she had cancer and just assumed she had died, so he married another without getting a divorce. Years later, he discovers his wife was alive all this time.
IS HE GUILTY OF BIGAMY? BIGAMY IS THE ACT OR CONDITION OF ANY PERSON MARRYING YET ANOTHER PERSON WHILE STILL BEING LAWFULLY MARRIED.
Answer:
No. He didn’t know that his other wife was alive so it’s not his fault unless he knew his wife was dead. I hope this helped.
Explanation:
Ned wants to enter the home of a suspect to search for evidence but does not have a warrant. He sees someone shredding paper through the window. Which of the following exceptions allow him to enter the home?
A.
probable cause
B.
arrest
C.
exigent circumstances
D.
hot pursuit
E.
USA PATRIOT Act
Answer: c
Explanation: took the test
Ned wants to enter the home of a suspect to search for evidence but does not have a warrant. Exigent circumstances following exceptions allow him to enter the home. Thus, the correct option is (C).
In the context of the criminal process, an exigent circumstance is defined as an emergency situation demanding immediate action to avert imminent risk to life or substantial property damage, or to avoid the probable escape of a suspect or the loss of evidence.
Conditions requiring a warrantless entrance, search, or seizure by police when a warrant would normally be necessary compare knock and announce rule, and no-knock search warrant at the warrant.
Therefore, the correct option is "C".
To know more about the exigent circumstances, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30611978
#SPJ2
Betty cut Anna when she slapped her. Anna suffered just a slight cut and a few drops of blood fell. Tom then got mad at Anna and shot her, and Anna lost a lot more blood, worth about as much fits into a 2 liter of Sprite. Anna bled to death.
DID BETTY CAUSE ANNA’S DEATH?
Answer:
okay according to me I think that but she was not responsible because she only cut anna and a few drops of blood fell but job short Anna and and bled to death so I think Tom was the one responsible for Anna's death
What argument can be made that would have kept president bush from becoming the running mate of john mccain in 2008?
Answer:
The dummies would argue two term limit but he would have been vice President not president
Explain how the cases of Bakke, the VMI, and Grutter relate to the Fourteenth Amendment.
When are jurors allowed to consider evidence? PLEASE ANSWERRRR FAST AND CORRECTLY WILL MARK BRAINLIESTTTT
Answer:
The jury listens to the evidence during a trial, decides what facts the evidence has established, and draws inferences from those facts to form the basis for their decision. The jury decides whether a defendant is "guilty" or "not guilty" in criminal cases, and "liable" or "not liable" in civil cases.
Explanation:
A jury must begin with at least 6 and no more than 12 members, and each juror must participate in the verdict unless excused under Rule 47(c). (b) Verdict. Unless the parties stipulate otherwise, the verdict must be unanimous and must be returned by a jury of at least 6 members.
ROUND 3 FREE BRAINIEST
Answer:
thanks
Explanation: