multiply. Express your answer in the simplest form

Full question attached

Answer and  explanation:

Answer and explanation attached

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

ok so lets assume that line PQ and RS and QR and PS are parallel lines cut by a transeversal. To prove this you can do it in a couple of different ways the one way i know is that if you assume these are parralel then you can uses the alternate interior anges to prove that measure of QSP and SQR then by logic you know that PQS + SQR = RSQ+QSP which symplifies to PQR = RSQ

Answer: x = 2

If x is the width of the window, the value for x that results in the greatest area-- presumably admitting the greatest amount of light.

Step-by-step explanation:

Initial calculations to find a starting value for w.

Determine dimensions that will have a sum of 8 as the perimeter. The length of the arc plus three sides of the rectangle.

The length of the arc is  half the circumference of the circle, the width is the diameter. So, modifying the equation: C= πd,  a = πw/2

Three sides of a rectangle (presumably a square for the initial calculation) 3w

Initial equation: 3w + πw/2 = 8    Substitute 3.14 for π  and solve for w

2(3w) + 2(3.14w/2) = 2(8)   multiply all terms by 2 to eliminate denominator

6w + 3.14w = 16   combine like terms

9.14w  = 16   divide both sides by 9.14

w ≈ 1.75

Calculate the area using this value:

Area of semicircle:  πr²/2   r= 1.75/2  

3.14(.875)²/2 ≈ 1.203

Area of rectangle  1.75 × 1.75 = 3.0625

Total Area with width 1.75  :  4.265 ft²

Increasing the width to 2

The length of the arc becomes 3.14   This is twice the area of the semicircle.

3.14/2 = 1.57

The height of the rectangle reduces to 1.43

1.43 × 2 = 2.86

Total area with width of 2 ft   2.86 + 1.57 = 4.43 ft²

So 2 ft seems to be the optimal width.

Answer:

[tex]x_1 = 1[/tex]

[tex]x_2=0[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is incomplete as the method is not given.

However, the question can still be solved.

Given

[tex]x_1 - x_2 = 1[/tex]

[tex]3x_1 + x_2 = 3[/tex]

Make xi the subject in the first equation

[tex]x_1 = 1 + x_2[/tex]

Substitute 1 + x2 for xi in the second equation

[tex]3(1+x_2)+x_2 = 3[/tex]

Open bracket

[tex]3+3x_2+x_2=3[/tex]

[tex]3+4x_2=3[/tex]

Collect Like Terms

[tex]4x_2 = 3-3[/tex]

[tex]4x_2 =0[/tex]

Solve for x2

[tex]x_2=0/4[/tex]

[tex]x_2=0[/tex]

Recall that:

[tex]x_1 = 1 + x_2[/tex]

[tex]x_1 = 1+0[/tex]

[tex]x_1 = 1[/tex]

Answer:The exact form is -10/7  the simplified form is -1 3/7

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation: I took it on a test and got it right

Answer:

Definitely

since the definition of a terminating decimal is one that has an ending, and a Repeating decimal is one that never ends.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

238, 000

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps </3

Answer:

Area of the circle = pi * r^2 = pi * (x+1) ^ 2

Circumference of the circle = 2* pi * r = 2*pi*(x+1)

Answer:

it doesn't because it's not a set of ordered pairs

Answer:

-3-,2,-1,0,1,2,3,4,5

Step-by-step explanation:

-4<n<6

Answer:

[tex]\frac{1}{9}[/tex]    

Answer:boo

Step-by-step explanation:booooo

Answer:

5 7/12 + 4 6/12 = 9 13/12 is correct but 9 13/12 is equal to 10 1/12 not 1 1/12  because 13/12 is 1 1/12 and you have to add 1 1/12 to 9. So the error analysis is simplifying  9 13/12 to 1 1/12.

Answer:

S = 1 bag of popcorn

Y = 1 water

Step-by-step explanation:

S x 3 + Y x 4 = R

40 - R = (The Answer)

Answer:

The  Decision Rule

Fail to reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion

 There is no sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean age of the cars is greater than that of taxi

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The data is  

      Car Ages 4 0 8 11 14 3 4 4 3 5 8 3 3 7 4 6 6 1 8 2 15 11 4 1 6 1 8

     Taxi Ages 8 8 0 3 8 4 3 3 6 11 7 7 6 9 5 10 8 4 3 4

      The  level of significance [tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex]

 Generally the null hypothesis  is  [tex]H_o  :  \mu_1 - \mu_2  = 0[/tex]

                  the alternative hypothesis is   [tex]H_a  :  \mu_1 - \mu_2 >  0[/tex]

Generally the sample mean for the age of  cars is mathematically represented as

        [tex]\= x_1 = \frac{\sum x_i }{n}[/tex]

=>     [tex]\= x_1 = \frac{4+ 0+ 8 +11 + \cdots + 8 }{27}[/tex]

=>     [tex]\= x_1 = 5.56[/tex]

Generally the standard deviation of age of  cars

     [tex]\sigma _1  = \sqrt{\frac{\sum (x_i - \= x)^2}{n_1} }[/tex]

=>  [tex]\sigma _1  = \sqrt{\frac{(4 - 5.56)^2 + (0 - 5.56)^2+ (8 - 5.56)^2 + \cdots + 8}{ 27} }[/tex]

=>  [tex]\sigma _1  =  3.88 [/tex]

Generally the sample mean for the age of taxi is mathematically represented as

        [tex]\= x_2 = \frac{\sum x_i }{n}[/tex]

=>     [tex]\= x_2 = \frac{8 +8 +0  + \cdots + 4 }{20}[/tex]

=>     [tex]\= x_2 = 5.85 [/tex]

Generally the standard deviation of age of  taxi

[tex]\sigma _2  = \sqrt{\frac{\sum (x_i - \= x)^2}{n_1} }[/tex]

=>  [tex]\sigma _2  = \sqrt{\frac{(8 - 5.85)^2 + (8 - 5.85)^2+ (0 - 5.85)^2 + \cdots + 8}{ 20} }[/tex]

=>  [tex]\sigma _2  = 2.83 [/tex]

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

   [tex]t = \frac{(\= x_ 1 - \= x_2 ) - 0}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma^2_1}{n_1}  + \frac{\sigma^2_2}{n_2} }  }[/tex]

=> [tex]t = \frac{(5.56 - 5.85 ) - 0}{\sqrt{\frac{(3.88)^2}{27}  + \frac{(2.83)}{20} }}[/tex]  

=> [tex]t = -0.30 [/tex]  

Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically  represented as

   [tex]df =  n_1 + n_2 -2[/tex]

    [tex]df =  27 +  20 -2[/tex]

    [tex]df =  45[/tex]

From the t distribution table  the [tex]P(t >  t )[/tex] at the obtained degree of freedom = 45 is  

   [tex]P(t >  -0.30 ) = 0.61722067[/tex]

So  the  p-value  is

    [tex]p-value  =  P(t >  T) =  0.61722067[/tex]

From the obtained values we see that the  p-value  >  [tex]\alpha [/tex] hence we fail to reject the null hypothesis

Hence the there is no sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean age of the cars is greater than that of taxi

Answer:

1 is -47.

2 is -20

3 is 16.

4 is 33.

Step-by-step explanation:

Brainiest?

Answer:

can you shorten down the question its too long to understand

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

c

Step-by-step explanation:

c because

Answer:

p = 15/40

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the total number of marbles is 40, that is our size of the sample. there are 16 red ones on that sample, so the probability of extracting a red marble from the box is given by the ratio of successes divided the total number of marbles:

p = 15/40

Answer:

C = 39.58cm

Step-by-step explanation:

2 * 3.14159 * 6.3

6.28318 * 6.3

39.584034

Answer:

see below

Step-by-step explanation:

The perimeter of a circle is called the circumference

C = pi *d

C = pi * 12.6

Using 3.14 as ab approximation for pi

C = 3.14 * 12.6

C =39.564 cm

Using the pi button  for pi

C =39.58406744

Answer:

i think i am going to pick a random letter because i cant see it ts blocked so i guess c

Step-by-step explanation:

Given , KM = 22

Then JL =

This trapezoid is an isosceles trapezoid which means its diagonals will be equal . So ,

KM = JL ( the diagonals in an isosceles trapezoid are congruent )

22 = JL

JL = 22

Therefore , JL = 22 .

Given , DF = 8.7

Then , EG =

Since this trapezoid is an isosceles trapezoid , its diagonals will be equal . So ,

DF = EG ( the diagonals in an isosceles trapezoid are congruent )

8.7 = EG

EG = 8.7

Therefore , EG = 8.7 .

Answer:

what do you need help with you did not provide a picture or any evidence

Step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation

Answer:

1/144

Step-by-step explanation:

You multiply the top and bottom by itself because its to the second and you get rid of the negative because negative multiplied by a negative is positive

so we know that the size of the triangle is decreasing witch means that the scale factor is going to be a fraction. to find this fraction you are going to divide the smaller side by the corisponding longer side.

12/72= 1/6

the correct answer is c 1/6

The scale factor of triangles ABC and DEF is 6.

Option A is the correct answer.

A scale factor is defined as the ratio between the scale of a given original object and a new object,

We have,

From the triangles,

The ratio of the corresponding sides of the two triangles must be equal.

The value of the ratio is the scale factor.

So,

AB/DE = BC/EF = AC/DF

This can be written as,

72/12 = 66/11 = 42/7

6 = 6 = 6

Thus,

The scale factor of triangles ABC and DEF is 6.

Learn more about scale factors here:

https://brainly.com/question/20759556

#SPJ5

Given :-

To Find :-

Solution:-

Taking the given equⁿ :

[tex]\bf \implies30=\dfrac{5}{6}y[/tex]

[tex]\bf \implies 30\times 6=5y[/tex]

[tex]\bf\implies y=\dfrac{\cancel{30}\times6}{\cancel5}[/tex]

[tex]\underline{\boxed{\red{\bf{\longmapsto \qquad y \qquad = \qquad 36 \qquad}}}}[/tex]

[tex]\boxed{\green{\bf\pink{\dag}\: Hence\:the\:value\:of\:y\:is\:36.}}[/tex]

Some rules :-

On transposing numbers or variables,

Answer:

The Y-intercept is the Y value when X = 0.

Find the change in X:

-56 to -42 = 14

-42  to -28 = 14

The X value changes by 14.

For every change in X the Y change:

66-58 = 8

58-50 = 8

For X to get from -28 to 0 would be 2 more changes:

-28 +14 = -14

-14 + 14 = 0

2 more changes of Y would be:

50-8 = 42

42-8 = 34

So when X = 0, Y = 34

The Y-intercept would be (0,34)

Step-by-step explanation:

like if it helps <3

Answer:

No, 6+3=9 is not an equation.

Step-by-step explanation:

The reason as to why this is not an equation is because an equation is a statement that asserts the equality of two expressions, which are connected by the equal sign. And 6+3=9 does not in fact connect two separate expressions.