Patron-librarian privilege is not a recognized legal privilege. Any person or group who visits the library physically or electronically to use its resources is referred to as a library patron. This person or group must have paid the library's yearly membership fee.
What does a library user consist of?The term "library patron" refers to a person or group who has paid the library's yearly membership fee in order to borrow materials from it or to access its resources online or in person. It also refers to circulation records that contain information about identifiable people.
How did librarians participate in the French Revolution?During the French Revolution, librarians had full charge of choosing books for the nation's citizens to read. As a result of this action, the idea of modern library service—the democratic extension of library services to all members of society, regardless of income or education—was put into practice.
To know more about Privilege visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/25657425
#SPJ4
How many days before closing must you deliver a copy of the appraisal to the borrower?.
A major reaon for a tractor colliion on public road i that they are much than other car
A major reason for a tractor collision on public road is that they are much slower than other cars.
The speed differential between tractors and vehicles is a significant contributor to agricultural machinery incidents on public roadways. As slow moving farm machinery is approached by drivers at such a rapid rate that they have little time to recognise the danger and take proper action.
Because of this, it is crucial for farm equipment to be clearly marked as travelling considerably slower than normal traffic and to be very visible.
A slow moving vehicle (SMV) symbol serves as the source of this identification. It must be: clearly visible at a distance of 150 metres, centred just on back of the tractor or following equipment, and between 60 cm & 1.8 metres above the road surface. SMV signs need to be kept tidy. Replace any signs that have faded or been destroyed.
To know more about slow moving vehicle:
brainly.com/question/28256674
#SPJ4
Why would the media push a non-political narrative that is untrue or misleading?
The reason that the media push a non-political narrative that is untrue or misleading is that:
Some possible reasons include the desire to attract readers or viewers, the desire to influence public opinion, or the desire to advance a particular agenda.Why do media push a non-political narrative?There are a variety of reasons why media organizations might push a non-political narrative that is untrue or misleading.
In some cases, media organizations may be motivated by profit, as sensational headlines or controversial stories can generate more clicks and ad revenue. In other cases, media organizations may be motivated by a desire to shape public opinion or to promote a particular ideology.
Therefore, It is important for readers and viewers to be aware of these potential biases and to critically evaluate the information they consume from the media.
Learn more about media from
https://brainly.com/question/26152499
#SPJ1
Public Defenders____.
A.) must be in their first year of practicing
B.) are paid by the government and must be ethically free from government
direction.
C.) must work pro bono
D.) are paid by the government and must disclose all information related to the
case to the prosecution
Answer: B
Explanation:
Answer:
I believe its B
Explanation:
How does mock trial help students? Write 1 paragraph 5 sentences each
Answer:
Mock trial is a great way for students to learn about the legal system and develop their critical thinking and public speaking skills. It allows students to gain an understanding of the court system and the roles of the different participants. It also provides an opportunity for students to practice their argumentation and presentation skills in a safe and supportive environment. Mock trial also helps students to develop their research and analytical skills as they prepare for their cases. Finally, mock trial helps students to develop their confidence and self-esteem as they learn to think on their feet and present their arguments in a persuasive manner.
Explanation:
Why does leslie gordon think it is a good idea for the government to make the sale of alcohol legal?.
Leslie Gordon believes legalizing the sale of alcohol is a good idea for the government because the tax revenue would raise more than $200,000,000 for critically important needs.
People tend to purchase alcohol on the black market since it is illegal to sell it, which has caused both a financial and a political issue for the government. As a result, Leslie Gordon believe that the government should legalize the sale of alcohol. that it would be wise for the government to legalize alcohol sales.The 18th Amendment was intended to make it illegal to sell and buy alcohol. But its proper execution was a failure.
learn more about sale of alcohol here:
https://brainly.com/question/21599095
#SPJ4
Lawmakers in new zealand will vote on whether the country should lower the voting age to. ?.
The national voting age in New Zealand will be lowered from 18 to 16, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said on Monday.
She made her declaration shortly after the nation's Supreme Court decided that denying 16 and 17-year-olds the right to vote constituted age discrimination. Although Ardern stated that she personally supports decreasing the age, a 75% supermajority of parliamentarians would need to approve for the move. Even the supporters admit they do not yet have the numbers. The question of lowering the voting age is being debated in a number of nations. Several countries, like Austria, Malta, Brazil, Cuba, and Ecuador, let citizens vote at 16 years old. Sanat Singh, co-director of the Make It 16 campaign in New Zealand, expressed his utter delight at the court's ruling.
learn more about new zealand voting age here:
https://brainly.com/question/26211549
#SPJ4
In the Supreme Court case of _____, the Court struck down Section 7 of the Military Commissions Act, which declared that Guantanamo prisoners could not bring habeas corpus petitions to federal courts to seek their release.
Section 7 of the Military Commissions Act, which prohibited Guantanamo prisoners from filing habeas corpus petitions in federal courts to request their release, was overturned by the Supreme Court in the Marbury v. Madison decision.
In a 2006 decision, what did the Supreme Court rule on military commissions?Without a congressional act, the President is not permitted to establish military commissions. Five officers must make up the board of a military commission rather than a single federal judge.
Which decision of the Supreme Court is most closely related to the exclusionary rule?Weeks v. United States provided the first explanation of the exclusionary rule (1914). The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in that case that the Fourth Amendment's safeguard against unauthorized searches and seizures should be interpreted to prohibit using incriminating evidence that was obtained unlawfully.
To know more about Military Commissions Act visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/6327433
#SPJ4
february 17, 1970, the family of this man was attacked and it was later determined via crime scene reconstruction that he was guilty of attacking his own family.
An attorney was employed by the United States Department of Health and Human Services in a regional office located in a tobacco-growing state. A labor contract between the agency and the clerical workers union contained a policy providing for termination of union employees only for certain specified grounds. The attorney, however, was not a member of the union and not covered by such a policy. The attorney was angered by the regional director's refusal to adopt a no-smoking policy for employees and visitors in the office. She posted a notice in the employee cafeteria ridiculing what she called the hypocrisy of an agency promoting health issues and nonsmoking programs while refusing to provide its employees with those same opportunities. The notice prompted a great deal of debate among the employees and was brought to the attention of the regional director, who was very displeased.
Which of the following statements is most accurate regarding the director's right to dismiss the attorney?
A The attorney has a liberty interest in the exercise of her First Amendment rights that entitles her to a hearing to contest the grounds of her dismissal.
B The attorney has a property interest as a public employee that precludes her from being fired without notice and an opportunity to respond.
C The attorney has no right to a hearing because her statements were not an expression of views on public issues.
D The attorney has both a liberty interest and a property interest that entitles her to a pre-termination evidentiary hearing.
The process of generating organizational policies is now more properly referred to as "policy making."
Free corporations should adhere to policy 1, as doing so will provide applicants who belong to underrepresented groups or have disabilities an extra point. Because of this method, Free Corporation won't have to alter its hiring criteria or other factors like technical expertise, personality type, experience, and many others. Therefore, by awarding extra points, they are merely providing this group of individuals a competitive advantage over other individuals, and by doing so, they may gradually instil this group of individuals into the company's culture and performance. The union that represents the workers at the Miracle Medical research company has opted against bargaining with them about the hiring of more personnel because it is their choice and has nothing to do with breaking any local, state, or federal laws.
Learn more about Policy making here:
https://brainly.com/question/29765758
#SPJ4
an oral contract that should be in writing to be enforceable under the statute of frauds may be enforceable if it has been partially performed.
The only writing sufficient to satisfy the Statute of Frauds is a typewritten form signed at the bottom by all parties with the heading Contract at the top.
Under fraud law, a contract to sell a real estate interest must be written off. The exception to this is a partially executed verbal property purchase agreement. Fraud laws regulate six specific types of contracts. A contract that is not governed by law does not have to be in writing to be enforceable.
However, in the case of verbal contracts only if the law requires a written contract, the oral contract will be considered legally void. Oral contracts apply as long as the essential elements of the contract are in place and offer acceptance exchanges of consideration and disagreements on specific terms of the contract. You do not have to agree to non-mandatory terms and conditions to make an oral contract enforceable.
Learn more about An oral contract here:- https://brainly.com/question/9380641
#SPJ4
Lawmakers in new zealand will vote on whether the country should lower the voting age to. ?.
The national voting age in New Zealand will be lowered from 18 to 16, Prime Minister announced. She made her declaration after Supreme Court decided that denying 16 and 17-year-olds.
Although Ardern stated that she personally supports decreasing the age, a 75% supermajority of parliamentarians would need to approve for the change. Even the supporters admit they do not yet have the numbers. The question of lowering the voting age is being debated in a number of nations. Several countries, like Austria, Malta, Brazil, Cuba, and Ecuador, let citizens vote at 16 years old. Sanat Singh, co-director of the Make It 16 campaign in New Zealand, expressed his utter delight at the court's ruling. It's a significant day, he remarked. Not just for our campaign, but also for the nation, this is historic.
learn more about new zealand here:
https://brainly.com/question/26211549
#SPJ4
Jorge downloads a movie onto his laptop without permission from the movie provider. Jorge has violated:
a. trademark law.
b. copyright law.
c. trade distribution law.
d. cybersquatting law.
positions such as justice of the peace and county tax assessor are important to a functioning democracy. State True or False your answer:
a. True
b. False
The statement is accurate. A functional democracy depends on positions like county tax assessor and justice of the peace.
What is the tax assessor's function?An assessor, sometimes known as a tax assessor, is a hired or elected representative tasked with figuring out the value of each taxable property in a county, municipality, or township in the United States.
Why is tax collection necessary for governments?Tax revenue is essential for governments to function. Real estate, personal property, and income are assessed for taxes by the federal, state, and local governments.
To know more about Justice visit:-
brainly.com/question/978006
#SPJ4
The ____ is the official statement of policy goals established by each party every four years.
The Party platform is the official statement of policy goals established by each party every four years.
A formal set of fundamental objectives that are backed by the political party or individual candidate in order to appeal towards the general public is known as a political party platform (United states English), party programme, or party manifesto (preferential phrase in British and frequently Commonwealth English). The ultimate goal of these documents is to win the support and votes of the general public on complex issues or topics.
A plank is a portion of a political platform that expresses an organization's, person's, or party's beliefs and positions on a particular issue. The word "plank" refers metaphorically to a simple stage composed of slats or planks of wood and describes a part of an entire political platform.
To know more about Party platform:
brainly.com/question/29548334
#SPJ4
the___within article i, section 8 of the u.s. constitution authorizes congress to pass laws protecting intellectual property.
The correct answer is the clause 8 within Article I, Section 8 of the US constitution authorizes congress to pass laws protecting intellectual property.
The clause actually bestows two separate powers: the ability to secure for a finite period of time the exclusive right to authors' writings, which serves as the foundation for U.S. copyright law, and the ability to secure for a finite period of time the exclusive right to inventors' discoveries, which serves as the foundation for U.S. patent law.
Trademarks are instead protected under the Commerce Clause because the clause is silent on whether Congress may protect them. Some of the terminology in the clause have dated connotations, which could be misleading to readers today.
For instance, "useful Arts" refers to all knowledge, not only the disciplines of current scientific investigation, and "Sciences" refers to all knowledge, not just the domains of modern scientific study.
To know more about 'intellectual property' related questions
visit- https://brainly.com/question/29452183
#SPJ4
What is the essential factor that defines whether a government has legitimacy?
O strong democratic institutions
O strong coercive power (police, etc.)
O the consent of the people
O providing social services to the people
One of the various ways in which parties contribute to democratic governance is by __________.
a. dividing the electorate
b. narrowing voter choice
c. nominating candidates
d. reducing accountability mechanisms
e. reducing inter-party competition
Nominating candidates is one of the many ways that parties support democratic governance.
What do the democratic parties look like?In the US, elections are held under a two-party system. This shows that both major political parties are in power at each level of government. These two parties in the US are the Republican Party and the Democratic Party.
What is the name of the Democratic Party?The Democratic Party initially went by the name "The Democracy" during the Jacksonian era, but in 1844 the name "Democratic Party" was chosen and made official. "Democrats" or "Dems" are the party's members' nicknames.
To know more about Candidate nomination visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/29616235
#SPJ4
The lawyer who represents the federal government and argues cases before the supreme court is the ________.
The solicitor general chooses which appeals from lower courts should be filed and personally approves each one that is submitted. This attorney represents the federal government before the Supreme Court.
The government's stance in a matter is decided by the solicitor general. The solicitor general (or an assistant) makes the oral arguments before the Court, while the lawyers in his or her office prepare and submit the petitions and briefs. The solicitor general may decide to intervene or make a statement as a third party in other situations when the United States is neither the petitioner nor the respondent. The justices occasionally request the solicitor general to comment on or submit a brief in a matter before granting cert., suggesting their potential interest in placing it on the docket. The justices' refusal to consider a matter may also be suggested by the solicitor general.
learn more about federal government here:
https://brainly.com/question/24049224
#SPJ4
in 1916, congress approved legislation for the creation of the national park service, a power expressly given in which clause?
Answer:
The Necessary and Proper Clause or the Elastic Clause
Explanation:
Elastic Clause, is a clause in Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 18:
"[The Congress shall have Power . . . ] To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."
Supreme court justices who support judicial activism and those who support judicial restraint.
Judicial activism supporter's are Chief Justice John Roberts, became one of the most prominent proponents and Judicial restraint supporter's are Thomas Jefferson, Learned Hand and Hugo Black.
A philosophy of judicial interpretation, or how judges interpret the law, is known as judicial restraint. Definitions fluctuate a little bit from source to source, like the majority of abstract ideas. Judicial restraint is the idea of a judge not introducing his or her personal preferences into court cases and decisions. Judicial activism is a method of using the court review process or a term used to describe a specific judicial decision in which the judge was seen as being more inclined to rule on constitutional questions and to invalidate legislative or executive measures.
learn more about Supreme Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ4
g as a matter of administrative convenience, the irs would prefer to have congress decrease (rather than increase) the amount of the standard deduction allowed to individual taxpayers.
TRUE. The IRS would prefer to have congress decrease the amount of the standard deduction allowed to individual taxpayers. On occasion, Congress must enact legislation that clarifies the tax law to change a result reached by the U.S. Supreme Court.
The standard deduction is a set sum of money that lowers the amount of income that is subject to taxation. The total of the basic standard deduction plus any additional standard deductions for old age or blindness constitutes your standard deduction. Generally speaking, the standard deduction changes depending on your filing status, whether you are 65 or older, blind, and/or whether another taxpayer can claim you as a dependent. It is also adjusted annually for inflation. Certain taxpayers are not eligible for the standard deduction. If you itemise your deductions, you are not eligible for the standard deduction.
To know more about Standard deduction:
https://brainly.com/question/29307306
#SPJ4
Which of the following most accurately describes direct finance?
The lenders and borrowers interact through a financial intermediary.
A buyer has a critical piece of information that directly affects the seller.
The lenders and borrowers come together in a market setting.
A seller has a critical piece of information that immediately affects the transaction.
The correct answer is lenders and borrowers come together in market setting.
What are lenders?Lenders are individuals or institutions that provide loans or credit to borrowers. They could be banks, credit unions, online lenders, or private individuals. Lenders assess the creditworthiness of borrowers based on factors such as credit history, income, and debt-to-income ratio. Depending on the type of loan and the lender's requirements, borrowers may be required to provide collateral or a co-signer to secure the loan. Lenders earn interest on the loans they provide, which is the profit they make on their investments. Borrowers must repay the loan amount with interest according to the terms and conditions agreed upon in the loan agreement. Lenders play an essential role in the economy by providing funding for businesses, individuals, and governments to invest in various project and initiatives.
To learn more about agreement, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14309911
#SPJ1
Under the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, if a lease does not state a clear expiration date, the lease is regarded as
Answer:
Hello. Under Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, if the lease does not specify or make clear an expiration date, the lease will be regarded as: A tenancy from period-to-period.
Explanation:
Question does not ask for an explanation, so one will not be given. Have a nice day user.
After reading the scenario, respond to A, B, and C below:
a. Describe the specific bureaucratic power being exercised in the scenario.
b. Explain how Congress could limit the exercise of bureaucratic power described in the scenario.
c. Explain how the President could limit the exercise of bureaucratic power described in the scenario.
Congress uses open hearings to keep an eye on administrative behavior. In some cases, Congress can also exert control over the bureaucracy by revising the law and making changes to the budget in order to provide those charged with carrying out its policies more guidance.
What do you mean by bureaucracy?Both a collection of non-elected leaders and an administrative policy-making body are referred to as bureaucracies.
A bureaucracy, historically, was a form of government administration where departments were run by non-elected people. Any significant institution today, whether it is privately or publicly held, is governed by bureaucracy.
Bureaucracy is exemplified by the public administration in many jurisdictions and sub-jurisdictions, but it may also be seen in any institution with a centralized hierarchical structure, such as hospitals, academic institutions, commercial businesses, professional societies, social clubs, etc.
Many pundits have suggested that bureaucracy are necessary in today's society. Whether bureaucrats should be independent or directly answerable to their political overlords is the first conundrum.
Learn more about bureaucracy, here
https://brainly.com/question/3950164
#SPJ1
According to Kathleen Dolan, one of the reasons that Congress is less popular than the presidency and the Supreme Court is because...
There are many Congress members while there is only one president and nine Supreme Court members
According to Kathleen Dolan, one of the reasons that Congress is less popular than the presidency and the Supreme Court is because there are many Congress members while there is only one President and nine Supreme Court members.
Because there are divides in many laws, it's difficult to appease everyone, which is why Congress is so unpopular. To understand the rules changes and the power dynamics between the Speaker and committee chairs, read through the six stages of the House of Representatives. Congress is the government branch with the lowest popularity. Some imagine it as the damaged branch that needs to be fixed. But it's also the most crucial.
Learn more on laws
https://brainly.com/question/29553499
#SPJ4
the 2013 supreme court case shelby county v. holden invalidated the key accomplishments of the voting rights act of 1965, which led to a cascade of new state laws intended to limit the right to vote for poor people of all races. true or false?
It is true that the 2013 supreme court case shelby county v. holder invalidated the key accomplishments of the voting rights act of 1965, which led to a cascade of new state laws intended to limit the right to vote for poor people of all races.
About shelby county v. holder
The Supreme Court of the United States made a significant ruling in Shelby County v. Holder concerning the constitutionality of provisions of Voting Rights Act of the 1965: Sec 5 (which mandates that some states and local governments obtain federal preclearance before making any changes to their voting laws or practises) and Section 4(b), which includes the coverage formula which determines which jurisdictions seem to be subject to preclearance based on their historical voting patterns.
By a vote of 5 to 4, the Supreme Court declared Section 4(b) unconstitutional due to the coverage formula's reliance on data that was more than 40 years old and thus no longer responsive to immediate needs. This made it an impermissible burden just on legal principles of the federalism & equal state sovereignty.
To know more about shelby county v. holder:
brainly.com/question/29593288
#SPJ4
there is fierce debate over how to spend federal educational funds. as your textbook notes, the current education secretary betsy devos is a strong advocate for ____.
DeVos is well-known for being "a fierce supporter of school vouchers," which would let pupils attend private schools while receiving public funding.
The U.S. Department of Education receives close to $79 billion annually from the federal government for primary and secondary education initiatives.From kindergarten through the twelfth grade, basic education is offered in American public schools. Parents and students receive this for free, but the federal government receives funding from both general taxes and taxes on property owners.Local contributions and state government funding are the two main sources of funding for elementary and secondary education.In light of this, we can say that Betsy Devos, the current secretary of education, is a fervent supporter of school vouchers.
Learn more about federal education funds here: https://brainly.com/question/6270391
#SPJ4
Which aspect changed in the treatment of young criminal offenders during the 1960s?.
in the text of this scenario explain how a structural barrier may challenge amash's political success as an independent