Answer:
Prime Minister or President
Explanation:
I am sorry if I am not a help
Roger's home originally cost him S165,000 For the first six years he lived there, his house grew in value at a rate of 1.6% per
year Afer that, his property value increased by 3.9% per year for the next eight years To the nearest hundred dollars, how
much had Roger's home increased in value after fourteen years?
a $76200
b
S75,600
c S81,500
$56400
Answer:
C: $81,500
Explanation:
i took the test :)
Answer:
ITS C JUST GIVE ME A LIKE THANK ME LATER
Explanation:
MUAH
Do you agree that there should be no trials in the Supreme Court, only hearings?
Answer:
I feel like this question is a matter of opinion. This should be your opinion. hope this helped :-)
Explanation:
Drag each tile to the correct box.
Place the technological advancements in the order in which they emerged.
To properly order the technological advancements in the Age of European Exploration, you can arrange them as follows:
Ptolemy's map of the worldThe first school of oceanic navigationPortuguese caravels with triangular sailsPtolemy's map of the world is the earliest among the listed advancements as it dates back to the 2nd century AD. It provided an important reference for European explorers as they ventured into unknown territories.
The establishment of the first school of oceanic navigation, such as the School of Sagres in Portugal, occurred during the 15th century. These schools aimed to train navigators and improve their knowledge and skills in oceanic exploration.
Portuguese caravels with triangular sails were developed and widely used by Portuguese explorers in the 15th and 16th centuries. This innovative sail design allowed ships to navigate more efficiently against the wind, enabling longer voyages and greater exploration possibilities.
To know more about technological advancements here
https://brainly.com/question/24197105
#SPJ2
Who won the super bowl 2019-2020
Answer:
the New England Patriots won in 2019
and the Kansas City Chiefs won in 2020
Explain the case of U.S. V. Cruikshank (1876). What happened leading to the case? What did the Supreme Court rule and what was their reasoning? What effect did this have in the South as discussed in the Video?
Answer and Explanation:
The events that led to this case happened at the time of the southern reconstruction, when, during the election for the governor of the Lusiana, several conflicts were established between whites and blacks, leading to the Colfaz Massacre in 1873, where more than 100 blacks were murdered by a fire caused by the whites. This meant that a group of white militants, including Cruikshank, were put on trial for violating federal laws and the Congressional Enforcement Act of 1870. They were convicted, but the supreme cord president overturned the convictions, saying that the correct was that accused men should go to state courts to stand trial and have protection.
The problem was that all the accused were white men who would be favored by the state courts of the southern states, who had a strong racism and recentness by blacks. The result of this was that blacks were increasingly at the mercy of the goodwill of whites, which allowed many abuses of the black population to occur, in addition to allowing the Ku Klux Klan to cause atrocities to blacks and to leave legally unharmed.
help help help help help
opinions about colonist and their lives
Answer:
colonist just wanted new lives and to start anew and did not want war with the native americans but the british pushed them to start that long lasting war with the native americans .
Explanation:
Which Enlightenment thinker thought that the powers of government should be separated?
Which characteristic of rule of law requires government actions to be open to the public?
Consistent application
Enforcement of the law
Accountability to the law
Transparency of institutions
Answer:
Transparency of institutions
Explanation:
I got it wrong because i thought it was consistent application but then after i submitted it it said Transparency of institutions was the correct answer
Answer:
Transparency of institutions
Explanation:
Type the correct answer in the box.
What weather pattern did Indian farmers depend on to bring water for their crops?
Indian farmers depended on the__________to bring water for their crops.
Answer:
monsoon rains
Explanation:
In the winter, they are in the northwest. In the summer, they are in the southeast
Answer:
The word is groundwater irrigation (or just irrigation).
What are the three branches of Oklahoma government?
executive
legislative
judicial
state
federal
local
What were some of the causes and effects of the fall of the Byzantine Empire?
Answer:
Corruption; as people governing were benefiting but not giving people the protection, public services and justice in return.
loss of trust to State authority, is the main reason.
The others are military and politic struggles. Inside the Empire and outside. People were trying to gain power, and following personal interests and this caused in long term disconnections between the top it self and towards the population.
At the end only value that kept them together was religion, and even that was shredded into pieces. Catholics, orthodox and Protestants were not getting on well.
Answer:
Corruption; as people governing were benefiting but not giving people the protection, public services and justice in return.
loss of trust to State authority, is the main reason.
The others are military and politic struggles. Inside the Empire and outside. People were trying to gain power, and following personal interests and this caused in long term disconnections between the top it self and towards the population.
At the end only value that kept them together was religion, and even that was shredded into pieces. Catholics, orthodox and Protestants were not getting on well.
Which of the following best describes the government of the Roman Republic?
A.
Their form of government was largely weak and ineffective.
B.
Their form of government was the first one to have democratic principles.
C.
Their form of government is not relevant to the governments of today.
D.
Their form of government has influenced the democratic governments of today.
Answer:
Correct answer is D. Their form of government has influenced the democratic governments of today.
Explanation:
Option A is not correct as government was far from weak, and government managed to strengthen the authority of the country and to create one of the strongest countries in history.
Option B is not correct as democratic principles existed even before, for example in Athens.
Option C is not correct as it is very relevant, and a large number of countries today have adapted their systems according to the systems of Roman republic.
Option D is correct as many countries, as we have said, for example United States have created their governments according to what existed in Roman Republic.
Which statements accurately explain why the Renaissance began in the Italian city-states?
a. Renaissance Italy was a patchwork quilt of city-states. Many were centers of_____
and______.
Answer:
A. Italian city-states were unified under one central government long before most other European countries, and that allowed the government to sponsor the arts.
C. Italy is in a good, central location for business and commerce so traders maintained contact with people and ideas from other places.
Hope this Helps :)
If not lmk so I can help further :):)
Explanation:
The Columbian Exchange was responsible for which of the following?
i. the spread of ideas and culture
ii. the exchange of new foods across continents
iii. the spread of disease
A.
i. only
B.
ii. only
C.
i. and ii. only
D.
i., ii., and iii.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Required
1. Which of the following was NOT a Constitutional amendment ratified
during the Progressive Era? *
2
Prohibition of the sale and consumption of alcohol
Graduated federal income tax
Eighteen year olds gain the right to vote in America
Direct election of U.S. Senators
Answer:
B) prohibition of the sale and consumption of alcohol
Following Archduke Franz Ferdinand's assassination, Austria-Hungary:
A. used the attack to justify taking aggressive action against Serbia
. B. supported the Ottoman Empire in its efforts to keep Serbia under its control
C. broke its military alliance with Germany, which had refused to condemn the Serbs.
D. joined the Triple Entente to defend itself from future Serbian attacks.
Answer:
A. used the attack to justify taking aggressive action against Serbia
Explanation:
Austria-Hungary sent them an ultimatum to Serbia, and Serbia agreed to most of it but the only part it didn't agree to was that Austria-Hungary was able to do an investigation of who did the assassination in which Serbia refused for Austria-Hungary to investigate. This then went to the German's in which they backed Austria-Hungary for being an ally in the war which then led to the out-break of world war 1.
Answer:
Correct answer is A. used the attack to justify taking aggressive action against Serbia .
Explanation:
Option A is correct because after the assassination on June 28th 1914, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia on July 28th, starting a great offensive on its western and northern boundaries.
B is not correct as Ottomans entered the war in later stage, and Serbia was not their territory.
C is not correct as Germany stayed on the side of Austria-Hungary.
D is not correct as Triple Entente fought against Austria-Hungary in this war.
-The amending process was included in the U.S. Constitution to provide
Answer: protect individual rights
Explanation:
can sum one help me plz, ill give you 150-300 points!
Graded Assignment
Machiavelli’s The Prince
Complete and submit this assignment by the due date to receive full credit.
(50 points)
Directions: Read the excerpt from Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince (1513) and answer the essay prompt highlighted below
Note:
Machiavelli hoped to impress, and get a job working for the powerful Medici family in Florence with this work on politics. It didn’t work, but it has proved to be a much loathed and admired analysis of human affairs from a coldly realist point of view. When Machiavelli speaks of a “prince,” he does not mean the son of a king, but is using the word in its older meaning “the first,” or the ruler of a territory. Italy was divided into many small city-states and other domains, which were in constant competition with each other.
From Chapter 17: On cruelty and compassion, and whether it is better to be loved than to be feared, or the contrary
Descending next to the other qualities mentioned before, I say that each prince ought to desire to be believed compassionate, and not cruel, nonetheless he must be alert not to use this compassion badly. Cesare Borgia was believed cruel; nonetheless, that cruelty of his restored the Romagna, unified it, and led it back to peace and to faith . . .
A prince, therefore, must not care about the infamy of cruelty in keeping his subjects united and faithful, because if he makes a very few examples, he will be more compassionate that those who, through too much compassion, allow disorders to occur from which arise killings and robberies. For the latter usually harm an entire population, but those executions that come from the prince harm a particular person . . .
From the above a debate arises whether it is better to be loved than feared or the contrary. The answer is that one would want to be both the one and the other, but because it is difficult to join them together, it is much safer to be feared than loved, if one has to do without one of the two. For the following may be said generally about men; that they are ungrateful, changeable, pretenders and dissemblers, avoiders of dangers, and desirous of gain, and while you do them good they are wholly yours, offering you their blood, their property, their life, and their children, as I said above, when the need is far off, but when it comes close to you they revolt. And that prince who has founded himself wholly on their words, because he finds himself naked of other preparations, is ruined. For the friendships that are acquired at a price, and not with greatness and nobility of spirit, are paid for but they are not possessed, and when they come due they cannot be used. Men have less fear of offending one who makes himself loved than one who makes himself feared, since love is held in place by a bond of obligation which, because men are wretched, is broken at every opportunity for utility to oneself, but fear is held in place by a fear of punishment that never abandons you…
Nevertheless, the prince must make himself feared in such a way that, although he does not acquire love, he avoids hatred; because he can endure very well being feared whilst he is not hated, which will always be as long as he abstains from the property of his citizens and subjects and from their women. But when it is necessary for him to proceed against the life of someone, he must do it on proper justification and for manifest cause, but above all things he must keep his hands off the property of others, because men more quickly forget the death of their father than the loss of their patrimony. Besides, pretexts for taking away the property are never wanting; for he who has once begun to live by robbery will always find pretexts for seizing what belongs to others; but reasons for taking life, on the contrary, are more difficult to find and sooner lapse. But when a prince is with his army, and has under control a multitude of soldiers, then it is quite necessary for him to disregard the reputation of cruelty, for without it he would never hold his army united or disposed to its duties.
Score
Essay Prompt: Write a 4-5 paragraph essay answering the question, who was Machiavelli and what was his opinion on the way a leader should rule; through love or through fear?
Make sure to include the following:
An introduction with background information on Machiavelli and Italy during the early Renaissance
One body paragraph explaining the main ideas of Machiavelli’s The Prince and why they were important to leaders in Florence at the time
One-two body paragraphs explaining Machiavelli’s opinion on whether it is better to be loved or feared and why a leader should avoid being hated.
Conclusion paragraph
Answer:
Your Score
___ of 50
Answer:
Niccolò Machiavelli was an Italian Renaissance political philosopher and statesman and secretary of the Florentine republic. His most famous work, The Prince (1532), brought him a reputation as an atheist and an immoral cynic.
Machiavelli believed as a ruler, it was better to be widely feared than to be greatly loved; A loved ruler retains authority by obligation while a feared leader rules by fear of punishment. In it, Machiavelli outlined his vision of an ideal leader: an amoral, calculating tyrant for whom the end justifies the means. The Prince not only failed to win the Medici family's favor, it also alienated him from the Florentine people.
Clearly a Renaissance man, Machiavelli showed his greatest skill and made his most lasting mark on history as a writer. He wrote histories, short stories, and even plays. The Prince, however, was Machiavelli's most influential work. It was an examination of how a leader could gain power and stay in power.
The general theme of The Prince is of accepting that the aims of princes – such as glory and survival – can justify the use of immoral means to achieve those ends. From Machiavelli's correspondence, a version appears to have been distributed in 1513, using a Latin title, De Principatibus (Of Principalities).
The author's name has been lent to a style of leadership and management associated with cynicism, deceit and guile. To be described as Machiavellian is to be insulted — it means being duplicitous, egocentric and manipulative. The Machiavellian is exploitative, competitive, and selfish.
Explanation:
This might be out of order a bit but I hope this helps! Good Luck! ;)
The developments described in the excerpt best illustrate which of the following?
Answer:a
Explanation:
The developments described in the excerpt illustrate the Second Great Awakening.
The Second Great Awakening
The Second Great Awakening was a religious movement that started in the 19th century.
The Second Great Awakening spread religion through revivals and preaching as it led to many new religious movements.
Joseph Smith was the founder of the Latter-day Saints.
Therefore we can conclude from the excerpt in the question that Joseph Smith created the Mormon movement during the second great Awakening.
Thus option A is the correct answer.
Learn more about the Second Great Awakening here:
brainly.com/question/26599204
Sea level changes occur at a rate of 10 m per 1,000 years.
How much will the sea level change over 100,000 years?
10 m
1,000 m
10,000 m
100,000 m
It's 1,000
Explanation: It's 1,000 because if you take the 10 m from before then times it by the power of three which is how much you multiplied the 1,000 from before then you get 100,000. So you would have to do the same thing with the ten which equals 1,000
which of the 3 main reasons of imperialism best explains why china was imperialized by the europeans
Answer:
ask god
Explanation:
This mural, located in the Oklahoma State Capitol, celebrates five of Oklahoma’s most famous __________, who became world famous for their work.
Answer:
D, ballerinas.
Explanation:
Answer:
hey whats up?
Explanation:
school
Why is the United States been so opposed to communism
Answer:
Because it is not superior to our Constitutional Republic
Explanation:
What role did William B. Travis play during the Texas Revolution?
A. Commander of Texas troops at the Alamo
B. Leader of the volunteer forces at Coleto Creek
C. Secretary of War during the ad interim government
D. Delegate to the Convention of 1836
Answer:
A
Explanation:
because it makes more senice
Why do most of the bills introduced in Congress never become law?
A. They are defeated in floor votes
B. They never get out of committee
C. They are vetoed by the President
D. They are overruled by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Answer:
I think C is correct.
Explanation:
When the President issues a veto, the bill returns to its House of origin.
hi mydear this question is very important it comes every time
Explanation:
C) they are voted by the president
How does rational basis test for equal protection differ from the strict scrutiny test?
Rational basis test: lenient, government must show rational relationship to legitimate interest.
Strict scrutiny test: strict, government must show compelling interest, narrowly tailored.
Two criteria are used by courts to assess equal protection claims made in accordance with the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution: the rational basis test and the strict scrutiny test.
The government must demonstrate that a law or policy has a rational connection to a legitimate government interest in order to pass the lenient rational basis test. This standard is frequently used when neither a fundamental right nor a suspect classification (such as race or national origin) is in question.
The government must demonstrate a compelling interest in the law or policy, as well as the fact that it is specifically tailored to serve that interest, in order to pass the strict scrutiny test which has a much higher bar. This test is typically used when a fundamental right is at stake or when a particular suspect category is being scrutinized.
learn more about Rational basis test here
brainly.com/question/33425647
#SPJ2
Why is it difficult for urban cities to get rid of rats?
Answer:
Because their rate of reproduction is quite fast and because most cities haven't done anything about their Population for a long time meaning they have had a long time to expand their 'territory'
But what do I know, I live in a village
what is political apathy
Answer:
Political apathy is an inclination of lack of responsiveness towards governmental issues.
Explanation:
How did the Chippewa Mole Lake Band and the Forest County Potawatomi protect the Crandon Mine site in northeastern Wisconsin?
Select the best answer choice.
A.
They petitioned the government to enforce conservation laws.
B.
They invoked the Seventh Generation amendment.
C.
They bought the land surrounding the mine site.
D.
They staged a march on Washington, D.C.