In their essay "Racial Formations," Michael Omi and Howard Winant argue that race is not a fixed or natural category, but rather a social construct that changes over time and across different contexts. They explain that race is quantified through various methods, such as the census, surveys, and official documents, which rely on self-identification or externally imposed categorizations based on physical traits, ancestry, or cultural practices.
The quantification of race has significant consequences for minority groups, as it can reinforce stereotypes, stigmatize certain identities, and perpetuate inequalities. For example, the racial categories used in the census and other official documents can shape political representation, resource allocation, and research priorities. These categories may also obscure or marginalize multiracial or ethnic identities, as well as the experiences of immigrants, refugees, and other groups that do not fit neatly into existing categories.
Furthermore, the quantification of race can also contribute to the internalization of racial hierarchies and the construction of racial identities. Omi and Winant argue that race is not just a matter of individual identity or prejudice, but also a structural feature of society that shapes social relations, institutions, and cultural meanings. By quantifying race, society reinforces the idea that race is a fixed and essential characteristic of individuals, rather than a socially constructed category that reflects historical and political forces. This can have a negative impact on minority groups, who may face discrimination, prejudice, and other forms of marginalization based on their racial identity.
What world-wide event, recently discovered by scientists, is used by some historians to describe the two hundred years near the end of the 3rd Millennium to explain civil unrest in many of the ancient river valley civilizations?
Whilst there has been no global phenomenon discovered by scientists that historians can solely attribute to the occurrence of civil unrest.
Why is this so.?This is because, within many ancient river valley civilizations during the final two centuries of the 3rd millennium, several factors have been identified as contributing significantly towards their eventual collapse.
Among these decisive influences are environmental deterioration, aggression from external parties, internal disputes and conflicts, as well as a failure in effective centralized political and economic structures.
Read more about civil unrest here:
https://brainly.com/question/242118
#SPJ1
Can somebody please help me with this essay?? I'd greatly appreciate it!!
(I'll raise the points & mark brainlest) Do not copy & paste someone else's please
Using at least 4 sources (an encyclopedia, the Internet, or other resources), discuss your chosen topic in a detailed report of at least 750-800 words. Make sure you use proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling. At the end of the report, include a bibliography listing all your sources.
Korean War:
Division after World War II
Invasion and Pusan Perimeter
Landing at Inchon
Stalemate on the battlefield and negotiating table
Truce, no treaty, remained divided
The Korean War was a significant conflict that took place on the Korean Peninsula from 1950 to 1953. It was a result of the division of Korea after World War II, where the Soviet Union occupied the northern half, and the United States occupied the southern half. The North was led by Kim Il-sung, a communist dictator, while the South was led by Syngman Rhee, a pro-Western authoritarian.
Division after World War II:
The division of Korea occurred in 1945 after the end of World War II. The Soviet Union occupied the northern half of the peninsula, while the United States occupied the southern half. The division was supposed to be temporary until a unified Korean government could be established. However, the two superpowers had different ideas on how to achieve this goal.
The Soviet Union supported the establishment of a communist government in North Korea, while the United States supported the establishment of a pro-Western government in South Korea. As a result, both Koreas developed very different political and economic systems.
Invasion and Pusan Perimeter:
On June 25, 1950, North Korea invaded South Korea, hoping to reunify the peninsula under communist rule. The North Korean army quickly advanced, taking control of most of South Korea in a matter of weeks. The United Nations Security Council, led by the United States, intervened and authorized a military coalition to support South Korea.
The coalition's initial strategy was to establish a defensive line along the southern coast of South Korea, known as the Pusan Perimeter, while reinforcements arrived from other countries. The Pusan Perimeter held off the North Korean advance for several months, but the situation was becoming increasingly dire.
Landing at Inchon:
General Douglas MacArthur, the commander of the United Nations forces, devised a daring plan to turn the tide of the war. He proposed an amphibious landing at the port of Inchon, which was behind North Korean lines. The landing would cut off the North Korean supply lines and force them to retreat.
The landing took place on September 15, 1950, and was a stunning success. The North Korean army was caught off guard, and their supply lines were cut off. The UN forces quickly advanced and liberated the South Korean capital of Seoul.
Stalemate on the battlefield and negotiating table:
After the landing at Inchon, the UN forces pushed into North Korea and came close to the Chinese border. China, fearing a UN invasion, intervened and sent hundreds of thousands of troops to support the North Koreans.
The war quickly became a stalemate, with both sides fighting over the same ground for months. The UN forces tried several times to break through the North Korean lines, but they were met with fierce resistance. The Chinese troops proved to be a formidable opponent, and the war became a bloody and costly stalemate.
Negotiations to end the war began in 1951, but progress was slow. Both sides were unwilling to compromise, and the fighting continued for two more years. In 1953, an armistice was signed, ending the fighting, but no treaty was ever signed.
Truce, no treaty, remained divided:
The armistice established a demilitarized zone (DMZ) along the 38th parallel, which was supposed to be a buffer zone between North and South Korea. However, tensions remained high, and occasional skirmishes continued to occur.
Today, North Korea remains a communist dictatorship, while South Korea is a democratic republic. The two countries are still technically at war, and the DMZ remains one of the most heavily fortified borders in the world.
In conclusion, the Korean War was a significant conflict that had a lasting impact on the Korean Peninsula and the world. It was a result of the division of Korea after World War II
[tex]\huge{\colorbox{black}{\textcolor{lime}{\textsf{\textbf{I\:hope\:this\:helps\:!}}}}}[/tex]
[tex]\begin{align}\colorbox{black}{\textcolor{white}{\underline{\underline{\sf{Please\: mark\: as\: brillinest !}}}}}\end{align}[/tex]
[tex]\textcolor{blue}{\small\texttt{If you have any further questions,}}[/tex] [tex]\textcolor{blue}{\small{\texttt{feel free to ask!}}}[/tex]
♥️ [tex]{\underline{\underline{\texttt{\large{\color{hotpink}{Sumit\:\:Roy\:\:(:\:\:}}}}}}\\[/tex]
Who discovered the South Pass to the Oregon Territory?
O Dr. Marcus Whitman
O Jason Lee
O Jedediah Smith
Answer:
Explanation:
Jedediah Smith is often credited with discovering the South Pass to the Oregon Territory.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
How would the US be different if the 1st Amendment didnt exist? you can put personal thoughts to :D
Answer:
Since the first amendment protects our freedom of expression, without it, we would be living in a world where the government controls us to a greater degree (no rallies/protests, the government can force one religion on everyone...etc)
The United States gained a virtual right of intervention in Cuba in the a. insular cases. b. Platt Amendment. c. Teller Amendment. d. Foraker Act.
Write a letter pretending you are an American soldier in the Vietnam war to your mother. Use the words: Vietminh, Gulf of Tonklin Incident, Gulf of Tonklin Resolution, Battle of Ia Drang Valley
Answer:
Dear Mom,
I hope this letter finds you well. Life here in Vietnam is tough, but I'm doing my best to stay strong. I know you must be worried about me, but I want you to know that I'm doing everything I can to stay safe.
We've been fighting against the Vietminh for what seems like forever now. It's a difficult and dangerous war, but we're all dedicated to the cause. You may have heard about the Gulf of Tonkin Incident in the news. It was a scary time for us, but we knew we had to keep fighting. The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution was passed shortly after, which gave us more support and resources to continue the fight.
Recently, we were involved in the Battle of Ia Drang Valley. It was a long and grueling battle, but we managed to hold our ground and come out victorious. It's moments like these that make me proud to be a soldier, knowing that we're making a difference in this war.
I miss you and the rest of the family terribly, but I know that I need to be here fighting for what's right. Please take care of yourself and know that I love you.
Your son,
[Your Name]
Select the correct answer.
Which of the following statements describes the command economy of the Soviet Union?
OA. The government allowed private businesses to produce goods and services demanded by the market
O B.
The government decided what goods and services would be produced and supplied to the market.
O C.
The government allowed workers to own the means of production.
OD. The government ensured high wages for workers.
Answer:
O B.
Explanation:
The answer is B, since the Soviet Union tightly controlled what would be allowed in the market.
What happened to the price of goods that the colonists exported? What action(s) did the colonists take in response to mercantilism?
3
Federalism in the U.S.: Mastery Test
Select the correct answer from the drop-down menu.
If the Supreme Court rules that a new state law conflicts with a federal law,
Reset
Next
If the Supreme Court rules that a new state law conflicts with a federal law, the federal law will take precedence over the state law.
How does federalism relate to state laws ?The Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution grants the principle of federal supremacy, indicating that both the Constitution and all other laws established in its name embody the highest law of the land. As a result, they prevail over state laws on American soil.
In situations where a discrepancy arises between federal and state regulations, it is the responsibility of the federal courts to interpret the Constitution's terms and decide which sets of legislation claim priority. This duty applies to all federal courts, including the Supreme Court itself.
Find out more on Supreme Court at https://brainly.com/question/3176565
#SPJ1
Plans for talks between the United States and China stalled when:
A. The United States said it would reduce its military presence in
Asia.
B. The United States sent troops into Cambodia.
C. The United States asked permission to send an official to China.
D. The United States said it would consider agreements with China
over Taiwan.
Answer:
its BExplanation:
The United States sent troops into Cambodia in 1970 to disrupt and destroy North Vietnamese supply lines along the H o Chi Minh trail, which ran through Cambodia. President Nixon argued that this was necessary to protect American troops in Vietnam and to encourage the Vietnamese to negotiate a peace agreement. However, the invasion was highly controversial and led to widespread protests domestically and internationally. It also increased tensions with the Cambodian government and fueled the growth of the Khmer Rouge, which eventually took power and committed genocide in Cambodia.
Plans for talks between the United States and China stalled when the United States sent troops into Cambodia. Thus, option B is correct.
What was the US China conflict?Since January 2018, when American President Donald Trump started imposing tariffs and other trade restrictions on China in an effort to pressure it to stop what the U.S. claims are longstanding unfair trade practices and intellectual property theft, there has been a growing economic rift between the two countries.
According to the Trump administration, these practices can add to the trade imbalance between the United States and China, and the Chinese government demands that American technology be transferred to China. China's government retaliated against US trade sanctions by accusing the Trump administration of acting in a nationalist and protectionist manner. A tough phase one deal between the two parties was achieved in January 2020 after the trade war intensified through 2019; it ended with China in December 2021.
Learn more about U.S China conflict here:
https://brainly.com/question/12023017
#SPJ5
Think about the news article excerpt you just read, and highlight the sentences that reveal the reporter's point of view.
The utterances of the speakers were still of a most inflammatory character, however, and the hearers who still remained grew riotous in demeanor. The police concluded to put an end to the disturbance, and advancing, ordered the crowd to disperse. At first the socialists fell back slowly, one of the speakers still urging them to stand firm. Suddenly the bombs were thrown. The police retorted instantly with a volley from their revolvers. The rioters answered with theirs, which shots showed they were provided with pistols. The mob appeared crazed with a frantic desire for blood and holding its ground, poured volley after volley into the midst of the officers.
But, the speakers' comments remained in being highly explosive, and the remaining audience members began behaving violently.
It was clear from their shooting that the rioters were armed as they fired back with their own weapons. The seemingly insane crowd held its position by firing volley after volley of shots at the police.
What is the main idea of the news story?News articles are written with the intention of informing and educating readers about current events and concerns. They are employed to inform readers on the topics they need or want to learn about.
What does the theory of crowd behavior entail?In a nutshell, the contagion theory holds that groups of individuals have an infectious effect that leads to irrational collective behavior. The contagion theory contends that individuals in a group exhibit emotional and impulsive behavior as a result of being influenced by the group's moods.
Learn more about contagion theory: https://brainly.com/question/12488533
#SPJ1
How the impact of power endured or change over time during the Mongol empire ?
Answer:
The impact of power during the Mongol Empire changed over time in several ways.
Expansion and Conquest: At the height of its power, the Mongol Empire, under the leadership of Genghis Khan and his successors, rapidly expanded its territories through conquest. The Mongols established one of the largest empires in history, stretching from Asia to Europe, and their military conquests brought significant changes in political power, economic systems, and social structures in the regions they conquered.
Centralization and Consolidation: The Mongols established a centralized system of government in their empire, where power was concentrated in the hands of the Great Khan and his family. The Mongols implemented policies to consolidate their rule, including the establishment of a hierarchical administrative structure, adoption of a census system, and imposition of Mongol laws and customs in the territories they conquered.
Cultural Exchange and Influence: The Mongols were known for their tolerance of different cultures and religions, which resulted in cultural exchange and influence between the Mongols and the conquered peoples. This led to the adoption of Mongol customs, language, and practices by some of the conquered populations, and also influenced the Mongols themselves, leading to changes in their way of life and governance.
Decline and Fragmentation: Over time, the Mongol Empire faced challenges such as internal conflicts, succession struggles, and external pressures from other powers. As a result, the empire started to decline and eventually fragmented into different Khanates, each with its own rulers and power centers. This led to a loss of central authority and a weakening of Mongol power over time.
Legacy and Impact: Despite the eventual decline of the Mongol Empire, its impact on the regions it conquered and its legacy endured. The Mongols left lasting influences on the political, economic, social, and cultural systems of the regions they ruled. Their conquests and rule had long-term effects on trade routes, diplomatic relations, cultural exchange, and governance structures in Eurasia, shaping the history of those regions for centuries to come.
In summary, the impact of power during the Mongol Empire changed over time due to expansion, centralization, cultural exchange, decline, and fragmentation. The legacy of the Mongol Empire continued to endure in the regions it conquered, shaping the history and development of those regions in various ways.
Your welcome!
which statement best completes the diagram
statement completes the best The diagram represents newly created technology. Option (D) is right as a result.
Society has undergone substantial transformation as a result of technological breakthroughs. The earliest technology that has been identified is the stone tool, which was employed during prehistoric times.
This was followed by the technology ability to regulate fire, which helped the human brain expand and language to emerge during the Ice Age. In the Bronze Age, the wheel was created, which facilitated increased travel and the development of more sophisticated machinery.
The printing press diagram , telephone, and Internet are examples of more modern technological innovations that have eliminated communication barriers and helped to establish the knowledge economy.
Learn more about technology, from :
brainly.com/question/28288301
#SPJ1
What were the causes of the rise of the ‘New Right’ and how did that movement dramatically shift the nature of American politics?
Module 6 DBA us history
the questions are
he start of the second Red Scare, and how it was similar and different from the first
Joseph McCarthy, McCarthyism, and its impact
Loyalty review boards
Goals of the United Nations, how it was similar and different from the League of Nations
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Roosevelt’s Four Freedoms
Reason for the Warsaw Pact
Significance of the Berlin Blockade
The Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan and how they compared
Effects of Soviet expansion/spread of communism on US foreign policy
Ethel and Julius Rosenberg
Second nation to acquire atomic weapons after the U.S.
Difference between hydrogen bomb and atomic bomb
Causes and effects of the arms race
The Cuban Missile Crisis, key actions, and its effects
How/Why the US got involved of the Korean War, key details during the war, and its effects
President who won election against Truman
Reasons for the creation of NASA
Containment policy
Why SEATO was formed
Peace Corps and how it related to the Cold War
How Geneva accords relate to the Vietnam War
How/why US got involved in Vietnam, protests, effects of the war
Gulf of Tonkin and its impact
Effects of GI bill on US economy
Post WWII population in US
Impact of advertising/groups that were targeted
Influence of Beatnik and Counterculture Movements
Watergate and its impact
Nuremberg trials and why they were held
Answer:
1. The start of the second Red Scare, and how it was similar and different from the first
The second Red Scare began after World War II, in the late 1940s and early 1950s, and was characterized by a fear of communism and Soviet influence in the United States. It was similar to the first Red Scare, which occurred after World War I, in that it was fueled by fear and paranoia about the spread of communism. However, the second Red Scare was different in that it was much more intense and far-reaching, with the government and private organizations actively seeking out suspected communists and punishing them through blacklisting, loyalty oaths, and other measures.
2. Joseph McCarthy, McCarthyism, and its impact
Joseph McCarthy was a US Senator from Wisconsin who became famous for his accusations that there were communists in the US government and military. McCarthyism refers to the practice of making accusations of subversion or treason without proper regard for evidence. McCarthyism had a major impact on American society, as it led to a climate of fear and suspicion, with many people being falsely accused of being communists and losing their jobs and reputations.
3. Loyalty review boards
Loyalty review boards were established during the second Red Scare to investigate the political beliefs and affiliations of government employees. These boards were intended to identify and remove communist sympathizers from government jobs, but they often operated with little oversight and often ruined the reputations and careers of innocent people.
4. Goals of the United Nations, how it was similar and different from the League of Nations
The United Nations was founded in 1945 with the goal of maintaining international peace and security, promoting human rights, and facilitating international cooperation on issues such as economic development and environmental protection. It was similar to the League of Nations, which had been founded after World War I with similar goals, but the United Nations was more successful in achieving these goals because it had the support of the United States and other major powers.
5. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Roosevelt’s Four Freedoms
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted by the United Nations in 1948 and sets out a list of fundamental human rights that are to be protected and upheld by all nations. Roosevelt’s Four Freedoms, which he outlined in a speech in 1941, included freedom of speech, freedom of worship, freedom from want, and freedom from fear. Both the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Roosevelt’s Four Freedoms reflect a commitment to human dignity and freedom.
6. Reason for the Warsaw Pact
The Warsaw Pact was a military alliance established by the Soviet Union and its satellite states in response to the formation of NATO by Western powers. The Pact was intended to provide a counterbalance to NATO and to ensure Soviet dominance in Eastern Europe.
7. Significance of the Berlin Blockade
The Berlin Blockade was a Soviet attempt to cut off access to the city of Berlin, which was divided into four zones of occupation after World War II. The blockade was a significant event in the early Cold War, as it demonstrated the Soviet Union’s willingness to use force to achieve its goals and prompted the United States to launch the Berlin Airlift to provide food and supplies to the city.
8. The Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan and how they compared
The Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan were both policies adopted by the United States in the early Cold War. The Truman Doctrine was announced in 1947 and provided military and economic assistance to countries threatened by communism. The Marshall Plan, which was announced the same year, provided economic aid to help rebuild Europe after World War II. The two policies were complementary, with the Truman Doctrine providing military support and the Marshall Plan providing economic support, and both were aimed at containing the
In the 1928 presidential election, Herbert Hoover:
A. only won the popular vote.
B. only won with the support of labor unions.
C. won by a small margin.
D. won the election by a landslide.
Option (d), Herbert Hoover won the 1928 presidential election with a resounding victory.
Who was chosen to serve as president in 1928, just as the American financial crisis began?Hoover beat Democratic nominee Al Smith in a landslide after winning the Republican nomination for president in 1928. Hoover became president in 1929 at a time of general economic stability.
Why did Hoover achieve victory in 1928?Hoover became the party's front-runner once President Calvin Coolidge decided against running for reelection. Due to the inability of Hoover's rivals in his party to agree on a nominee, Hoover won a landslide majority of the vote at the Republican National Convention in 1928.
Learn more about Herbert Hoover: https://brainly.com/question/12255447
#SPJ1
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Under the Great Compromise, representation in the Senate was:
Under the Great Compromise, representation in the Senate was evenfor all states
How the Great Compromise affect the senateThe Great Compromise, better referred to as the Connecticut Compromise, was devised in order to allot equivalent Senate representation towards each state of the union, regardless of their population size.
Every single state received two Senators as part and parcel of this arrangement; thereby assuring that smaller states would partake in an identical role as large and populous states within this legislative unit. This compromise sought to satisfy both large and small states concerning the formation of a new nation's legislative body during the inceptive United States Constitution drafting process of 1787.
Learn more about great compromise at
https://brainly.com/question/5172111
#SPJ1
Make a list of TEN reasons that explain why Dr. king's dreams came or did not come true for people living in the USA.
Major Takeaways. The "I Have a Dream" speech by Martin Luther King Jr. was originally intended as a call to combat job and economic disparities. King thought that the market-based structure of the American economy encouraged discrimination, unemployment, and other forms of economic injustice.
What about Martin Luther King?From 1955 until his death in 1968, American Baptist clergyman and activist Martin Luther King Jr. was one of the most well-known figures in the civil rights movement. King attended graduate school at Boston University and obtained his Ph. D. there after graduating with a degree in divinity from Pennsylvania's Crozer Theological Seminary. The civil rights activist was killed by a bullet in the jaw while on his way to supper while in Memphis to support a strike by sanitation workers. His spinal cord was also cut. After King arrived at a hospital in Memphis, his death was officially declared. He had 39 years on him.To learn more about Martin Luther King, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/17746240
was the allied dual-thrust strategy the best one to use in the pacific war? why or why not?
Answer: The Allied dual-thrust strategy, which involved simultaneous advances towards Japan through the Pacific Islands and the Asian mainland, was a controversial strategy in the Pacific War.
On one hand, the strategy allowed the Allies to engage Japanese forces on multiple fronts, spreading their resources thin and making it more difficult for them to mount a cohesive defense. It also allowed the Allies to maintain pressure on Japan and prevent them from consolidating their forces in any one area.
On the other hand, the strategy required significant resources and stretched Allied supply lines, making it difficult to maintain momentum and supply troops effectively. The terrain and climate of the Pacific Islands also posed significant logistical challenges for the Allies, making it difficult to maintain troop morale and momentum.
Ultimately, the effectiveness of the dual-thrust strategy is difficult to evaluate definitively. Some argue that it was the best strategy given the circumstances of the war, while others argue that a more focused strategy on either the Pacific Islands or the Asian mainland would have been more effective. However, it is worth noting that the strategy did ultimately lead to Allied victory in the Pacific War.
Explanation:
What does Chapman mean when he writes, "I am sure you
agree that this is not just a problem for Jewish people to work out alone, but one of urgent
concern for America and all the United Nations"?
Chapman could be making a statement about the need for cooperation and collaboration among different groups to tackle societal issues that affect us all.
What major problems faced by the Jews that concerned America and the rest of the world?Amongst major problems that have faced the Jews which have concerned America and the rest of the world included:
1. Anti-Semitism: Anti-Semitism has been a major problem that has affected Jews around the world, including in Europe, the Middle East, and America.
2. Holocaust: During World War II, the Nazi regime led by Adolf Hitler systematically murdered six million Jews in what is known as the Holocaust.
3. Israeli-Palestinian conflict: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been an ongoing issue for decades, and it has had a significant impact on the Jewish community and the rest of the world.
These are some of the major problems that have faced the Jews and have concerned America and the rest of the world.
learn more about Chapman: https://brainly.com/question/30016202
#SPJ1
25 This map shows a trade system that emerged in the 1500s and
reached its height in the 1700s.
Transatlantic Slave Trade
on Line ape
IN
-E
A Labor demands of the factory system
B Invention of the steamboat
C Labor demands of the plantation system
D Invention of the mechanical loom
Recons
construct
Which factor was a reason for the trade system illustrated on this
map?
Answer:
A B and
Explanation:
i think it'sone of the.
Which of the following is an ideology by John Locke
a) The poor should have property
The occultation of smallpox
c) Christianity should be spread through emotions
d) The idea of life, liberty, and property
Answer:
I'm sure it's
d) The idea of life, liberty, and property.
Let me know if it's right. :)
Hope it helped! :)
Answer:
d
Explanation:
I'm pretty sure so yea bye
You learned that the author's message in "The Battle of Greasy Grass" is that the battle "was a watershed moment in the history of Indigenous-U.S. relations." You also learned that the message in "The Little Horn Massacre" is that the battle was a disaster for the United States. Since the two accounts have the same general purpose, explain how the perspective of the accounts helps communicate the different messages.
By exposing the divergent perspectives of Indigenous peoples as well as the United States, the stories points of view aid in the communication of the various messages.
"The Little Horn Massacre" message:In addition to highlighting Indigenous peoples , "The Battle at Greasy Grass" under scores the battle's significance in influencing Indigenous U.S. relations.
Yet, "Some Little Horn " presents the conflict as a dreadful American defeat, showing the American military officials.
Both narratives aim to inform readers about the war, but they approach the task from various perspectives, shedding light on the complexity and subtleties of historical occurrences.
Readers are prompted to reflect critically on the events and draw their own judgements about the meaning and influence of the through the presentation of several viewpoints.
To know more about Indigenous peoples visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27960189
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
"The Battle of Greasy Grass" focuses on the struggle of Native Americans in the United States, emphasizing the effects of the battle on the community. "The Little Horn Massacre" focuses on the failure of the United States and the poor performance of the US military. Both have the same reason for looking at the war, but the diversity of points of view highlights particular angles of events and leads to different conclusions.
on what basis does douglass demand the end of slavery? how do his arguments relate to the ideology of the american revolution?
Your assignment, you need to look at what was happening in Germany under Hindenburg (the leader prior to Hitler). What did he do that set in motion the rise of the Nazis? What economic factors were at play in Germany that Hindenburg couldn’t control? Leadership matters, and how did his impact the era?
AND…how did Hitler and the Nazis step into the vacuum? In other words, how did they rise to power? Do you think it was inevitable that they would have seized power…or do you think Hitler’s rise could have been averted? Really the question is about, “how did Hitler come to power”...but I really want you to look at the process, the leadership styles etc.
During the Weimar Republic in Germany, Hindenburg served as president from 1925 until his death in 1934. His presidency was marked by political and economic instability in Germany, which paved the way for the rise of the Nazis.
What actions triggered the rise of the Nazis?One of Hindenburg's main actions that sparked the rise of the Nazis was his decision to appoint Hitler as Chancellor of Germany in January 1933. Hindenburg believed that he could control Hitler and that the Nazis would help stabilize the country.
Therefore, this decision proved to be a grave mistake, as Hitler and the Nazis quickly seized power and established a dictatorship, which led to the horrors of the Holocaust and World War II.
Find out more about Nazis at:
https://brainly.com/question/11331942
#SPJ1
true or false: between 1000-1800, the worship of islam in africa was primarily concentrated to egypt and other regions adjacent to the arabian peninsula.
Answer:
true
Explanation:
Note how quickly after the United States bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki the Japanese surrendered. Why do you think this was so? Do you think the quick surrender justified the bombings?
Answer:
I think the quick surrender was a result of a combination of factors, including the Soviet Union's declaration of war on Japan and the overwhelming military power of the United States. Whether or not the bombings were justified is a complex ethical question that continues to be debated by historians and scholars.
Explanation:
What were the three reasons the industrial revolution began in england
Evaluate the extent to which religion was the primary factor leading to conflict in
the period 1450–1750.
Answer:
The Incas, Mughals, and the Ottomans were examples of the empires that did practice religious tolerance, unlike many other states.
Explanation:
If you need anything in the interim, please contact my assistant"
A block of wood has a density of 0. 6 g/cm3 and a volume of 1. 2 cm3. What is the mass of the block of wood?
AYUDA RAPIDO TENGO 1 HORA PARA RESPONDER ESTO NESESITO DE AYUDA
The mass of the block of wood is 0.72 g in the given case
The formula to calculate the mass of an object is:
Mass is a measure of the amount of matter in an object. It is a scalar quantity and its unit is measured in kilograms (kg) in the SI system. Mass is different from weight, which is a measure of the force exerted on an object by gravity and is dependent on the object's mass and the acceleration due to gravity at a particular location.
mass = density x volume
In this case, the density of the block of wood is 0.6 g/cm3 and the volume is 1.2 cm3. Plugging in these values, we get:
mass = 0.6 g/cm3 x 1.2 cm3
mass = 0.72 g
Therefore, the mass of the block of wood is 0.72 g.
To know more about assistant HERE
https://brainly.com/question/25964907
#SPJ4