1) Smartphones with built-in cameras have made photography more accessible to a wider audience.
2) On the positive side, these platforms have provided a global audience and a sense of community for photographers.
3) One artistic movement that was influenced by the camera is Impressionism.
How does smart phone affect photography?Impressionism is one creative trend that was impacted by photography. Impressionist painters used bold colors and loose brushstrokes to try to capture transitory moments and the dance of light.
The development of the camera, with its capacity to snap rapid photos and stop time in its tracks, had an impact on the Impressionists' methods of approaching their subjects.
Learn more about photography:https://brainly.com/question/31166522
#SPJ4
Johnny is a fourth grade boy who did not talk until he was three
years old. He interprets things people say very literally and does
not make eye contact when speaking with others. Johnny has problems
Based on the given information, Johnny's difficulties in communication and social interaction may indicate the presence of certain developmental or psychological challenges.
Two potential explanations for his behaviors could be:
1. Language and Communication Disorder: Johnny's delayed speech development until the age of three suggests the possibility of a language disorder, such as a specific language impairment or a developmental delay. His literal interpretation of language could indicate difficulties understanding figurative language or nuances in communication. This could impact his ability to effectively engage in conversations and comprehend social cues.
2. Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): Johnny's difficulty with eye contact and literal interpretation of language are common characteristics associated with ASD. ASD is a neurodevelopmental disorder that affects social interaction, communication, and behavior. Individuals with ASD may have challenges with social skills, nonverbal communication, and understanding abstract or figurative language.
It is important to note that a proper diagnosis can only be made by a qualified professional, such as a psychologist or a speech-language pathologist, through a comprehensive evaluation of Johnny's developmental history, behaviors, and other relevant factors. Additionally, early intervention and appropriate support services can play a crucial role in addressing Johnny's challenges and promoting his development and well-being.
To learn more about social interaction, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30642072
#SPJ11
Watson and Rayner claimed that they demonstrated that phobias could be classically conditioned. To what extent is this true of clinical phobias? Outline the evidence to support your case. Ensure that in your answer you define the relevant terms, describe how phobias are argued to develop and be maintained using a conditioning framework.
Watson and Rayner's claim that phobias could be classically conditioned holds true to a significant extent in the context of clinical phobias.
Phobias are argued to develop and be maintained through the process of classical conditioning, which involves the association of a neutral stimulus (conditioned stimulus) with a negative or fearful experience (unconditioned stimulus), leading to the development of a conditioned fear response.
1. Classical Conditioning and Phobias:
Classical conditioning is a type of learning in which an initially neutral stimulus becomes associated with an unconditioned stimulus that elicits a natural response. In the case of phobias, the neutral stimulus can be any object, situation, or event that, through repeated pairing with a negative experience, becomes a conditioned stimulus that triggers fear or anxiety.
2. Development of Phobias:
Phobias are argued to develop through the process of acquisition, where a previously neutral stimulus (e.g., spiders) becomes associated with a negative experience (e.g., a traumatic event involving spiders). This association leads to the formation of a conditioned fear response, where the individual experiences fear or anxiety in the presence or anticipation of the phobic stimulus.
3. Maintenance of Phobias:
Once a phobia has been acquired, it can be maintained through several mechanisms, including stimulus generalization, stimulus discrimination, and reinforcement. Stimulus generalization occurs when the fear response extends to similar stimuli, even if they are slightly different from the original phobic stimulus. Stimulus discrimination, on the other hand, involves the ability to differentiate between the phobic stimulus and similar non-phobic stimuli.
4. Evidence Supporting Classical Conditioning:
Numerous studies have provided evidence supporting the role of classical conditioning in the development and maintenance of phobias. For example, researchers have demonstrated that individuals can develop phobic responses through direct conditioning experiences, such as pairing a neutral stimulus (e.g., a specific sound) with an aversive event (e.g., an electric shock).
5. Experimental Studies:
Experimental studies using fear conditioning paradigms have shown that individuals can acquire phobic responses to previously neutral stimuli, such as snakes or spiders, through the process of classical conditioning. These studies have provided insights into the underlying mechanisms of phobias and have contributed to the development of effective treatments, such as exposure therapy, which aims to weaken the conditioned fear response.
In conclusion, the claim made by Watson and Rayner regarding the role of classical conditioning in phobias is supported by extensive evidence. Phobias are argued to develop and be maintained through the process of classical conditioning, where a neutral stimulus becomes associated with a negative experience, leading to the formation of a conditioned fear response. Experimental studies have provided robust evidence supporting the role of classical conditioning in the development of phobias and have paved the way for effective treatment approaches.
To know more about clinical phobias click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30759161
#SPJ11
Why do you think historical fiction appeals to children?
Historical fiction appeals to children because it provides an opportunity to learn about the past in an entertaining and engaging manner. It allows them to visualize and connect with historical events and people by presenting them in a relatable way.
Historical fiction also helps children develop empathy and an understanding of different cultures and perspectives, as well as critical thinking skills, as they compare and contrast historical accuracy with the creative liberties taken by the author. In addition, historical fiction provides an opportunity for children to explore the complexities of human nature, and to see how individuals respond to difficult situations and moral dilemmas. By reading about the lives of characters who lived in a different time and place, children can gain a broader perspective on the world and their place in it. Historical fiction also allows children to explore their own identity and heritage, as they learn about the experiences of people from different cultures and time periods. This can foster a sense of pride and appreciation for their own cultural background, as well as an understanding and respect for others. Finally, historical fiction can be an enjoyable and engaging way for children to learn about history. Rather than being presented with a dry recitation of facts, they are drawn into a story that brings history to life, making it more memorable and meaningful.
learn more about children
https://brainly.com/question/32268201
#SPJ11
In what ways does Last Sickness model a humanizing paradigm of care for the elderly and those approaching or receiving end of life care? Amid the COVID-19 crisis, how have we witnessed the emergence of a highly utilitarian and practical rhetoric regarding the "benefit-maximizing allocation" of resources, particularly at the outset of the pandemic? Could this reverberate beyond our present moment and have a lasting impact on how we value and treat our elderly and vulnerable populations, both within healthcare and society? How have the extreme circumstances of the pandemic enabled or exacerbated ageism in various forms?
Last Sickness model humanizing paradigm of care for the elderly and those approaching or receiving end of life care by doing the following;It shifts the focus of care from curing the disease to alleviating the patient's suffering; the health care provider supports the patient in living the best possible life until death.
It provides the care recipient with holistic attention and tailored assistance to accommodate their needs and respect their autonomy.
It values the care recipient's dignity, cultural values, religious beliefs, and wishes in the decision-making process and as an ethical and moral obligation of caregivers.
Amid the COVID-19 crisis, we have witnessed the emergence of a highly utilitarian and practical rhetoric regarding the "benefit-maximizing allocation" of resources, particularly at the outset of the pandemic. This has led to the restriction of visiting policies, rationing of medical supplies, and access to health care services for non-COVID patients and the elderly. It has resulted in moral distress for healthcare providers, discrimination against vulnerable populations, and an exacerbation of existing inequalities. This may have a lasting impact on how we value and treat our elderly and vulnerable populations, both within healthcare and society.
The extreme circumstances of the pandemic have enabled or exacerbated ageism in various forms by discriminating against the elderly, making them more vulnerable to the virus, and exacerbating the inequalities in health care services. The Last Sickness model offers a humanizing approach to care for the elderly and vulnerable populations that values their dignity, autonomy, and well-being. By promoting this model, healthcare providers, policymakers, and society can improve their attitudes towards the elderly and vulnerable populations and create a more inclusive and just society.
Learn more about COVID-19:
https://brainly.com/question/29475764
#SPJ11
Can someone compare and contrast the between hinduism and
buddhism in 3 to 4 paragraphs in a humanities class perspective,
thank you.
Hinduism focuses on fulfilling duties and achieving spiritual liberation within the cycle of birth and rebirth, while Buddhism emphasizes the pursuit of enlightenment and liberation from suffering, rejecting the concept of an eternal self.
Hinduism is a complex and diverse religious tradition that originated in ancient India. It encompasses a wide range of beliefs, rituals, and practices, with no single founder or central authority.
Hinduism is characterized by its belief in karma (the law of cause and effect), dharma (moral and ethical duties), and the pursuit of spiritual liberation (moksha) through various paths such as devotion, knowledge, and righteous action.
Buddhism, founded by Siddhartha Gautama (the Buddha), is a spiritual and philosophical tradition that emerged as a reform movement within Hinduism.
It emphasizes the Four Noble Truths, which address the nature of suffering and its cessation, and the Eightfold Path, a guide for ethical living and achieving enlightenment (nirvana).
Buddhism rejects the authority of the Vedas and focuses on individual spiritual development and awakening through meditation and mindful living.
Learn more about Hinduism here:
https://brainly.com/question/771499
#SPJ4
What might co-sleeping indicate about expectations for marital
relations in a culture that practices it?
The practice of co-sleeping in a culture can indicate a strong emphasis on familial closeness, intimacy, and interconnectedness. It may suggest that marital relations are viewed as an integral part of the family unit and are expected to be nurtured within the context of a shared sleeping space.
In cultures that practice co-sleeping, where couples and sometimes their children sleep together in the same bed or shared sleeping area, there is often an underlying belief in the importance of familial bonds and closeness. Co-sleeping signifies a desire to foster a strong sense of intimacy and interconnectedness within the family unit. In such cultures, marital relations are not merely seen as a private matter between spouses but are considered an integral part of the broader family structure.
By sharing a sleeping space, couples in these cultures may aim to enhance emotional and physical intimacy, emphasizing the idea that marriage is not solely about individual satisfaction but also about building and maintaining strong familial ties. Co-sleeping can create an environment that promotes emotional support, communication, and a deep sense of belonging within the family. Consequently, expectations for marital relations in these cultures often include an emphasis on open communication, mutual care, and prioritizing the needs of the family as a whole.
Learn more about marital here:
https://brainly.com/question/30704119
#SPJ11
What is a drug sentence and what is a prison sentence. What is
the difference between those two.
(2 paragraph at least please thanks)
While both drug sentences and prison sentence are form of punishment for criminal offenses. Drug sentences are specifically related to drug-related offenses and can be accompanied by other penalties, while prison sentences can be imposed for a range of crimes.
The primary purpose of drug sentencing is to discourage individuals from engaging in drug-related activities by imposing legal consequences. By administering penalties for drug offenses, authorities aim to deter potential offenders and send a message that drug-related crimes will be met with punishment. The severity of the sentence depends on factors such as the nature and quantity of drugs involved, the individual's criminal history, and the jurisdiction's legal guidelines.
While drug sentences serve the purpose of deterring drug-related offenses, they can have profound consequences for offenders. Lengthy prison terms can disrupt an individual's personal and professional life, leading to the loss of employment, strained relationships, and challenges in reintegrating into society after release. Moreover, the disproportionate impact of drug sentencing on certain communities, such as minority groups, has been a subject of concern and criticism.
In contrast, a prison sentence is a punishment that involves the confinement of an offender in a correctional facility. Unlike drug sentences, which specifically pertain to drug-related offenses, prison sentences can be imposed for various criminal acts. The primary objective of a prison sentence is to hold offenders accountable for their crimes, protect society from further harm, and provide an opportunity for rehabilitation.
While both drug sentences and prison sentences are forms of punishment for criminal offenses, there are notable distinctions between the two. Drug sentences are specifically related to drug-related offenses and can be accompanied by other penalties, while prison sentences can be imposed for a range of crimes. It is crucial for drug sentencing to be administered judiciously to ensure that the punishment aligns with the offense committed and that the long-term consequences on individuals are carefully considered. Striking a balance between deterring drug-related crimes and promoting fair and proportionate sentencing is essential for an effective and just criminal justice system.
To know more about prison sentence click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28654026
#SPJ11
Proposals to raise the minimum wage to be paid to employees have been criticized on the basis that increasing wage expenses to employers will cause employers to reduce workforces. What school of jurisprudence supports the critics’ position?
a) natural law
b)legal positivism
c) political jurisprudence
d) law and economics
The school of jurisprudence that supports the position that raising minimum wage will cause employers to reduce workforces is law and economics.
Law and economics is the field of legal research that deals with the use of economic principles to analyze legal issues. This jurisprudential school posits that law is a social tool that is designed to maximize social welfare and create incentives that promote efficiency and wealth maximization.
Raising minimum wage, according to law and economics, would increase the costs of production, which would reduce the demand for labor. Employers, as a result, would respond by reducing workforces or automating jobs that would have been done by minimum wage workers.
Know more about school of jurisprudence here:
https://brainly.com/question/5482988
#SPJ11
Based on the findings of the National Institute of Mental Heath (NIMH), which of the following disorders was the most common in the US?
Group of answer choices
Obsessive-compulsive disorder
panic disorder
schizophrenia
major depressive disorder
According to the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), the most common disorder in the United States is major depressive disorder.
Major depressive disorder, also known as clinical depression, is a mood disorder characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and a loss of interest in activities. The NIMH has reported that major depressive disorder is the most prevalent mental disorder in the United States. It affects millions of adults, adolescents, and children each year.
While other disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, and schizophrenia are also significant mental health conditions, major depressive disorder stands out as the most common in terms of prevalence. It can have a profound impact on individuals' daily functioning, relationships, and overall well-being. The NIMH findings highlight the importance of recognizing and addressing major depressive disorder as a significant public health concern. It underscores the need for effective prevention, diagnosis, and treatment strategies to support individuals affected by this prevalent disorder.
Learn more about support here:
https://brainly.com/question/28187223
#SPJ11
Make 3 arguments to support this topic about "Priest’s
Endorsement of Political Candidates (Against)", support
your answers with credible articles, news, etc.
Do not copy others' answer, thank you
Priest's endorsement of political candidates should be discouraged due to potential conflicts of interest, violation of separation of church and state, and undermining the principle of religious diversity.
Conflicts of interest: Priests, as religious leaders, have a responsibility to serve the spiritual needs of their congregations without favoring any particular political candidate. When priests publicly endorse political candidates, it can create conflicts of interest and compromise their role as spiritual guides.
The endorsement may lead to biased religious messaging and pressure on congregants to support a specific candidate. This can undermine the integrity and impartiality of the religious institution. A New York Times article titled "When Politics Enters the Pulpit" (October 2019) explores how such endorsements can blur the line between religion and politics, potentially harming the community's trust in the clergy's spiritual guidance.
Violation of separation of church and state: The endorsement of political candidates by priests can blur the line between religious institutions and the state. The separation of church and state is a fundamental principle in many democracies, aimed at ensuring religious freedom and preventing the dominance of any particular religious group in politics.
By endorsing candidates, priests risk violating this principle and intruding upon the political realm. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) provides an overview of the separation of church and state and highlights the importance of maintaining neutrality in their publication "The Separation of Church and State" (2021).
Undermining religious diversity: Endorsements by priests may marginalize or exclude members of their congregation who hold different political beliefs. Religious institutions should strive to create an inclusive and welcoming environment for all believers, irrespective of their political affiliations. When priests publicly endorse candidates, it can create divisions within the religious community and give the impression that certain political views are more acceptable or endorsed by the faith.
An article by the Pew Research Center titled "Most U.S. Catholics say their priests should not endorse specific candidates" (October 2019) highlights the concerns raised by Catholics themselves about priestly endorsements and the potential impact on religious diversity within their community.
In conclusion, discouraging priests from endorsing political candidates is crucial to maintain their impartiality, preserve the separation of church and state, and foster religious diversity within the community. By avoiding public endorsements, priests can focus on their primary role as spiritual leaders, respecting the diverse political beliefs of their congregants and preserving the integrity of their religious institutions.
Learn more about religious here:
https://brainly.com/question/32756779
#SPJ11
Grow more food and increase the number of family farms QUESTION 9 All of the following happens to the cattle that consume the com grown by the filmmakers, EXCEPT: They develop obesity They have decreased ability to produce saturated fat within their meat They develop stomach ulcers They become sick due to acidosis QUESTION 10 Overall, the filmmakers ended up making money on their acre of corn. True False 10 points 10 points Save Save Ar
1. Grow more food and increase the number of family farms. All of the following happens to the cattle that consume the corn grown by the filmmakers, except They develop stomach ulcers. Option C is the correct answer.
As Ian and Curt learn, corn is a common ingredient in American foods. The mainstays of the contemporary diet are high-fructose corn syrup, meat raised on maize, and processed foods made with corn. The government subsidy program that encourages maize production above and beyond any market demand is what enables America to produce record-breaking corn harvests.
2. Overall, the filmmakers ended up making money on their acre of corn. This statement is true. Corn grain has become the most stable in America.
Ian and Curt conclude their acre of land shouldn't be planted in corn again—if they can help it—as they head back to Iowa to see their 10,000-pound crop fill the combine's hopper and find its way into America's food supply. By the summer, the grain Belt is on track to produce a record 11 billion bushels of grain, and their modern farm is prospering. Ian and Curt leave the farm when their crop reaches head-high heights to investigate the source of America's plenty.
Learn more about Corn here:
https://brainly.com/question/397421
#SPJ4
The complete question is, "Grow more food and increase the number of family farms. All of the following happens to the cattle that consume the com grown by the filmmakers, EXCEPT:
A. They develop obesity
B. They have decreased ability to produce saturated fat within their meat
C. They develop stomach ulcers
D. They become sick due to acidosis
2. Overall, the filmmakers ended up making money on their acre of corn. True OR False"
would you say that family structure (e.g., single parent families, etc.) or family process (e.g., how the family interacts) is more important in influencing child development outcomes? Try to provide evidence from several lines of research. Would this conclusion apply to other settings (e.g., child care, schools) as well?
Family structure and family processes both have significant impacts on child development outcomes. However, when it comes to determining which of the two factors has a more significant influence, family processes are more crucial than family structure.
Research evidence confirms that family structure, such as the number of parents, remarriages, single-parent families, or two-parent families, does not directly influence children's development as much as family processes, such as parenting style, communication, and conflict resolution. This essay will discuss the reasons why family processes influence children's development more than family structure and why the same conclusion can apply to other settings.
Evidence from Research Multiple lines of research have shown that family processes such as communication, warmth, parental involvement, and parental support have a greater impact on children's developmental outcomes compared to family structure. For example, children who grow up in single-parent households tend to have more behavioral, cognitive, and emotional issues than those from two-parent households. Nonetheless, this does not necessarily mean that living with a single parent is detrimental to child development.
What matters is the quality of parenting and the parenting style that the single parent provides. Hence, it is essential to examine the family's processes to understand the quality of parenting children receive rather than the number of parents in the household.
Other research studies have demonstrated that when the quality of parenting in both single-parent and two-parent households is similar, children from single-parent families display development outcomes that are similar to children from two-parent families. Therefore, the family structure is less important compared to the quality of family processes.
The ConclusionIt is worth noting that the conclusion that family processes are more critical than family structure can apply to other settings as well, such as child care centers and schools. For instance, a positive learning environment, the quality of teachers, and the effectiveness of communication among teachers, students, and parents are more significant than the structure of the learning environment.
Therefore, it is vital to focus on the family processes when trying to improve child development outcomes rather than merely considering the family structure. Family processes are more crucial than family structure in influencing child development outcomes.
learn more about child development:
https://brainly.com/question/731839
#SPJ11
According to Eli's Choice by Amy Dockser Marcus, how do the
educational benefits of inclusion contrast with the social
isolation that Eli experienced in his inclusive school
placement?
In Eli's Choice by Amy Dockser Marcus, the educational benefits of inclusion contrast with the social isolation that Eli experienced in his inclusive school placement by the fact that he received good grades despite being socially isolated.
Inclusion is a term that refers to a school placement system in which students with disabilities are placed in general education classes for at least a portion of the day. Despite the fact that the educational advantages of inclusion for students with disabilities have been extensively discussed and examined, socialization difficulties continue to be a major issue for many inclusion students.
The educational benefits of inclusion contrast with the social isolation that Eli experienced in his inclusive school placement according to Eli's Choice by Amy Dockser Marcus. Despite being socially isolated in school, Eli achieved good grades and made progress academically.
The tension between Eli's academic achievement and his social isolation is emblematic of the challenges that inclusion students confront. Although school inclusion offers a plethora of educational advantages, addressing the social and emotional needs of inclusion students is critical if inclusion is to be successful.
To know more about Inclusion
https://brainly.com/question/25713465
#SPJ11
Since Maya Bhd had just appointed a number of new directors and they are not familiar with the changes that we made to duties of directors under the company. The senior directors have asked you to explain the major changes that have been introduced under the 2016 Company Act.
You are required to advice on the important changes that were introduced in the Company’s Act 2016 with regards duties of directors.
The 2016 Company Act introduced significant changes regarding the duties of directors, and it is important to advise the new directors of Maya Bhd on these changes.
The 2016 Company Act brought about important changes in the duties of directors, which are crucial for the new directors of Maya Bhd to be aware of. One significant change is the expansion subsidiaries of the fiduciary duties of directors, emphasizing the duty to act in the best interests of the company. Directors are now required to exercise reasonable care, skill, and diligence in carrying out their responsibilities. They are also obligated to avoid conflicts of interest and disclose any personal interests in company matters.
Another key change introduced by the 2016 Company Act is the emphasis on director's responsibilities regarding corporate governance. Directors are now responsible for ensuring proper financial reporting, internal control systems, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Act also places a greater emphasis on transparency and accountability, requiring directors to maintain accurate and complete records and disclose relevant information to shareholders.
In summary, the 2016 Company Act introduced significant changes to the duties of directors, expanding their fiduciary duties and emphasizing corporate governance responsibilities. It is crucial for the new directors of Maya Bhd to be aware of these changes to fulfill their obligations effectively and ensure compliance with the Act.
Learn more about subsidiaries here
https://brainly.com/question/32571445
#SPJ11
Address cultural messages and attitudes that may have an impact on food choices, body image, self-esteem, and disordered eating.
How do societal factors influence eating behavior and self-image?
What influences are present in the American culture? Are these similar to or different from other cultures?
Discuss your opinion regarding this issue. What would you like to see change?
In America, as well as in many other countries, there are societal factors that have an impact on eating behavior and self-image. These societal factors may include cultural messages and attitudes, such as those surrounding food choices, body image, self-esteem, and disordered eating.
Some of the ways that these societal factors can influence eating behavior and self-image include:
1. Body Image: The societal pressures of body image have a significant impact on how people view themselves and how they eat. For example, the media often promotes unrealistic body standards that can make people feel inadequate and unhappy with their own bodies. This can lead to disordered eating behaviors, such as binge eating or restrictive eating, as people attempt to meet these unrealistic standards.
2. Food Choices: In America, there are many cultural messages and attitudes surrounding food choices. For example, there is a belief that some foods are "good" while others are "bad," and that one must avoid the "bad" foods to be healthy. This can lead to disordered eating behaviors, such as obsessive calorie counting or restrictive eating.
3. Self-Esteem: Many people's self-esteem is tied to their appearance, and the societal pressures surrounding body image can have a significant impact on this. When people feel unhappy with their bodies, it can lead to low self-esteem, which can further exacerbate disordered eating behaviors.
In my opinion, these societal factors have a negative impact on individuals and should be addressed. I would like to see more emphasis placed on self-love and acceptance, rather than promoting unrealistic body standards.
Additionally, I think it would be helpful to provide education on nutrition and health, rather than simply promoting "good" and "bad" foods. This would allow individuals to make informed choices about what they eat, rather than feeling pressured to conform to societal norms.
Know more about societal factors here:
https://brainly.com/question/32664795
#SPJ11
How could the confound be fixed in Scenario D? Be sure to tell
me what technique you are using (constancy, repeated measures,
randomization, elimination, or balancing), as well as how you would
apply
To fix the confound in Scenario D, the technique of randomization can be applied. Randomization involves assigning participants to different conditions or treatments randomly, ensuring that each participant has an equal chance of being assigned to any of the conditions.
In this case, to address the confound, researchers could randomly assign participants to the treatment group (receiving the new drug) or the control group (receiving a placebo or standard treatment). By using randomization, any potential confounding variables that may influence the results would be evenly distributed across the two groups, reducing the likelihood of biased results.
This random assignment of participants helps to create comparable groups, balancing out the effects of potential confounds between the treatment and control groups. By doing so, researchers can isolate the effects of the new drug more accurately, allowing for a more valid evaluation of its effectiveness without the influence of confounding variables.
To learn more about treatments
https://brainly.com/question/31369415
#SPJ11
Pwychopaty has been found to enly in the following personality doorden EXCEPT Substance Use Disorder Scotypal Personality Disorder Narcis Ponsonality Disorder Antioco Personality Disorder QUESTION 21 2 points Which of these intervention treatments would be LEAST IROY to be helpful in reducing poychopathy and Callous unemona tras? Reward-Based Parent Management Training Bio-Feedback Neurocognitive Computer-based training Cognitive Behavioral Therapy QUESTION 22 2 points SA "The Vacation thought exercise we did in closest supports which disim below Our experience of disgust is an evolutionary adaptation for survival Our experience of disgustis rooted in social belonging and help us t in with other O human feel gust in the way None of the Above
The intervention treatment that would be least likely to be helpful in reducing psychopathy and callous-unemotional traits is Bio-Feedback.
While Bio-Feedback can be a useful technique for various psychological conditions, it is not typically the primary treatment approach for addressing psychopathy or callous-unemotional traits. Other interventions such as Reward-Based Parent Management Training, Neurocognitive Computer-based training, and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy have been found to be more effective in addressing these specific issues.
Regarding question 22, the statement from "The Vacation" thought exercise that best supports the claim is "Our experience of disgust is an evolutionary adaptation for survival." The thought exercise explored the notion that certain emotions, including disgust, have evolved as adaptive responses to protect individuals from potentially harmful or dangerous situations. This aligns with the idea that disgust serves a survival function in humans.
To learn more about intervention treatment
https://brainly.com/question/28448683
#SPJ11
Write any FOUR (4) differences between the conscious mind and the
unconscious mind. Explain these differences (40 Marks).
The conscious mind and the unconscious mind have distinct differences. The conscious mind is our present awareness, rational, with limited capacity, and accessible to voluntary control. In contrast, the unconscious mind holds thoughts and memories outside of conscious awareness, operates on instincts, has vast storage capacity, and requires specialized techniques for access. These differences highlight the characteristics of conscious and unconscious mental processes.
Awareness and accessibility: The conscious mind represents our immediate awareness of thoughts, feelings, and perceptions, while the unconscious mind holds thoughts and memories that are not consciously accessible.
Rationality and instincts: The conscious mind is primarily associated with rational thinking, logical decision-making, and critical analysis, while the unconscious mind operates on instincts, automatic processes, and intuitive responses.
Limited capacity and vast storage: The conscious mind has limited capacity and can only hold a few pieces of information at a time, while the unconscious mind has a vast storage capacity, housing a wealth of memories, experiences, and information.
Voluntary control and involuntary processes: The conscious mind is under voluntary control, allowing us to direct our attention, thoughts, and actions consciously. In contrast, the unconscious mind controls involuntary processes, such as breathing, heart rate, and automatic behaviors.
These differences demonstrate the contrasting characteristics and functions of the conscious and unconscious mind, highlighting their distinct roles in shaping our thoughts, behaviors, and overall mental processes.
You can learn more about conscious mind at
https://brainly.com/question/25388633
#SPJ11
answer in essay form. thank you...
You suddenly travel back 100,00 years back to a cave that will eventually be discovered by archeologists, what will you write on the wall to mess with them?
In conclusion, if I suddenly traveled back 100,000 years back to a cave that will eventually be discovered by archaeologists, I would write on the wall "The world will end on December 21, 2012" to mess with them.
If I suddenly travelled back 100,000 years back to a cave that will eventually be discovered by archaeologists, I would write the following on the wall to mess with them:" The world will end on December 21, 2012.
"The reason why I would write this is because this would mess with the archaeologists and lead them to believe that the people who inhabited the cave had some advanced knowledge or insight into the end of the world. This is because there was a widespread belief that the world would end on December 21, 2012, which was based on the Mayan Long Count Calendar.
As a result, this inscription on the cave wall would lead the archaeologists to believe that the people who inhabited the cave had some form of knowledge or insight into the end of the world. This would create a mystery and lead to further investigation and research, which would make my little prank even more amusing.
Know more about archaeologists here:
https://brainly.com/question/28209452
#SPJ11
Mary finds a correlation of .55, however, it is not statistically significant at the .05 level (two-tailed). What advice might you give her? Run more participants because the effect size is pretty big Do an experiment instead Tell her that sometimes intuition is a better gauge of significance than statistics. Tell her that you are sorry but there is nothing she can do.
The advice that should be given to Mary is to run more participants because the effect size is pretty big.
In statistics, the correlation coefficient, r, gives a measure of the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables. It varies between -1 and 1, where a value of -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship, a value of 0 indicates no linear relationship and a value of 1 indicates a perfect positive linear relationship.
The strength of the relationship between two variables is assessed using the magnitude of the correlation coefficient. The statistical significance of the relationship is evaluated using the p-value.
In this case, since the correlation of .55 is not statistically significant at the .05 level (two-tailed), it means that the relationship between the two variables is not significantly different from zero. However, since the effect size is pretty big, running more participants may lead to a significant result.
Therefore, advising Mary to run more participants is the best thing to do.
Read more about statistical significance here:
https://brainly.com/question/30311816
#SPJ11
Describe the taboo on eating nasal mucus in your social
setting(s), such as who/what/when. Consider: who is most
shamed/stigmatized by snot-eating, and why?
Eating nasal mucus or snot is considered a taboo in various social settings, evoking feelings of disgust among most people. The act of picking one's nose and consuming the nasal mucus is discouraged, particularly in children, who are taught to refrain from such behavior. The taboo surrounding eating nasal mucus varies across cultures and locations.
In terms of the individuals most stigmatized by snot-eating, children bear a significant portion of the shame and are often subject to discipline and punishment in their early years. This is because picking their noses and consuming snot can introduce germs, viruses, or bacteria into their bodies, potentially leading to illnesses. Therefore, it is crucial to teach children proper nose-cleaning techniques and discourage the habit of eating their nasal mucus.
Adults who engage in snot-eating face even more significant stigma, as their behaviour is seen as a violation of good manners and hygiene. Eating nasal mucus is generally regarded as unhygienic and uncivilized, leading to societal disapproval and negative perceptions.
Overall, the taboo surrounding eating nasal mucus serves as a social construct aimed at promoting good hygiene practices and avoiding potential health risks. It is an aspect of social etiquette that discourages the consumption of nasal mucus and emphasizes the importance of maintaining cleanliness and proper manners.
Know more about snot-eating:
brainly.com/question/30101672
#SPJ11
Alice Walker once said "Not everyone's life is what they make of it. Some people's life is what other people make it." This quote best embodies the notion of how things like racial injustice can occur as a result of a(n) external attribution O illusory correlation O fundamental attribution error self-fulfilling prophecy
This quote of Alice Walker best embodies the notion of a self-fulfilling prophecy.
A self-fulfilling prophecy is a belief or expectation about a person or a group that influences their behavior in a way that aligns with the original belief or expectation. In this context, the quote suggests that individuals' lives can be shaped or influenced by the actions and perceptions of others, rather than solely being determined by their own choices or efforts. The quote implies that external factors, such as societal biases and injustices, can play a significant role in shaping individuals' lives. It suggests that individuals may be limited or impacted by the expectations and treatment imposed upon them by others. This aligns with the concept of a self-fulfilling prophecy, where the beliefs or actions of others contribute to shaping an individual's life trajectory.
It highlights the influence that external attributions, expectations, and social structures can have on individuals and their opportunities.
To know more about societal biases, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/26244302
#SPJ11
How do the concepts of charity and state-sponsored support
discussed in this section relate to a work circumstance in which
you are or were involved, or in a human service with which you are
familiar?
In a work circumstance or human service setting, the concepts of charity and state-sponsored support play crucial roles in addressing social issues, such as homelessness.
Take, for instance, a non-profit organization providing support services to the homeless population. Charity comes into play when private individuals or organizations donate funds, supplies, or volunteer their time to assist the organization in its mission. These acts of charity provide immediate relief and support to those in need.
The relationship between charity and state-sponsored support in this scenario is symbiotic. Charity addresses immediate needs, while state-sponsored support offers sustainable and systemic solutions. By combining the efforts of private individuals, organizations, and government support, a more holistic approach can be taken to tackle social challenges effectively and create lasting impact in the lives of those being served.
Learn more about symbiotic
https://brainly.com/question/30825617
#SPJ11
FILL THE BLANK.
_____ 16. The primary characteristics that describe an individual or group of people is a definition of which of the following terms:
a. demographics
b. psychographics
c. both of these.
d. none of the above.
16. The primary characteristics that describe an individual or group of people is a definition of demographics and psychographics which means option c. both of these.
The primary characteristics that describe an individual or group of people encompass both demographics and psychographics. Demographics refer to objective traits such as age, gender, income, education, and geographic location, which provide statistical information about a population. On the other hand, psychographics delve into subjective characteristics like attitudes, values, lifestyles, and interests, providing insights into the psychological and behavioral aspects of individuals or groups. By considering both demographics and psychographics, marketers and researchers can gain a comprehensive understanding of their target audience and tailor their strategies accordingly.
Therefore, the correct answer is that it includes both demographics and psychographics.
To know more about Demographics, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/19721754
#SPJ11
A recent research article found that the relationship between playing violent video games and aggressive behavior is 22 What proportion of the vanability seen in aggressive behavior can be explained by playing violent video games? O.02 OOO OO .22 44 .05 O.11 and the X
The proportion of variability seen in aggressive behavior that can be explained by playing violent video games is 22%.
It seems there is confusion or missing information in the question, as the statement "the relationship between playing violent video games and aggressive behavior is 22" is unclear. To determine the proportion of variability explained, we typically need additional information such as statistical results or the coefficient of determination (R-squared) from a regression analysis.
Without the necessary information or the value of X, it is not possible to calculate the precise proportion of variability explained in this case. It's important to have specific data on the relationship between playing violent video games and aggressive behavior to determine the proportion of variability explained accurately.
If you have additional information or can clarify the question further, I would be happy to assist you in calculating the proportion of variability explained.
Learn more about video games: https://brainly.com/question/908343
#SPJ11
What are the differences and similarities between biologycal
approach and cognitive approach
The biological approach and the cognitive approach are two distinct perspectives within psychology that focus on different aspects of human behavior and mental processes.
Here are the key differences and similarities between the two approaches:
Differences:
Focus: The biological approach emphasizes the role of biological factors, such as genetics, neurochemistry, and the structure and function of the brain, in shaping behavior and mental processes.
It looks at how biological systems and processes influence cognition and behavior. In contrast, the cognitive approach focuses on mental processes, including perception, attention, memory, thinking, and problem-solving. It explores how individuals acquire, process, and use information.
The biological approach seeks to explain behavior through physiological and genetic factors. It investigates how the brain and body function and how they influence thoughts, emotions, and actions.
The cognitive approach, on the other hand, seeks to explain behavior by understanding mental processes like perception, memory, and decision-making. It examines how information is processed, stored, and used by the mind.
Methods: The biological approach often utilizes techniques such as brain imaging (e.g., fMRI, PET scans), genetic studies, and physiological measurements to study the biological underpinnings of behavior. In contrast, the cognitive approach employs methods like experiments, observation, and cognitive tasks to investigate mental processes and behavior.
Similarities:
Focus on the individual: Both approaches focus on understanding individual behavior and mental processes. They aim to explain how individuals perceive, think, and behave in their environment.
Scientific approach: Both approaches rely on empirical evidence and scientific methods to study human behavior and cognition. They use systematic observation, experimentation, and data analysis to test hypotheses and draw conclusions.
Complementary nature: The biological and cognitive approaches are not mutually exclusive but can be complementary.
While the biological approach explores the physiological basis of cognition, the cognitive approach examines the mental processes that underlie behavior. Together, they provide a more comprehensive understanding of human behavior and cognition.
To learn more about cognitive, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/7272441
#SPJ11
Research shows that it is a logical decision for White suburban kids to stay in school and go onto college. Is the same true for Black (and Hispanic) kids from poorer, inner-city areas? Is the fact that these groups are less likely to get a four-year degree also a logical decision?
However, the same may not hold true for Black and Hispanic kids from poorer, inner-city areas due to systemic barriers and socioeconomic disadvantages.
No, the fact that these groups are less likely to get a four-year degree is not a logical decision.
The decision for White suburban kids to stay in school and pursue higher education is often supported by various factors, including access to quality education, socioeconomic advantages, and social norms within their communities. These factors create an environment where going to college is seen as a logical and attainable goal.
However, Black and Hispanic kids from poorer, inner-city areas face systemic barriers and socioeconomic disadvantages that affect their educational opportunities. These barriers can include inadequate school resources, lower-quality education, limited access to college-preparatory programs, and financial constraints.
Moreover, these communities may also experience higher rates of poverty, crime, and limited social support systems, which can further hinder educational attainment.
The lower likelihood of obtaining a four-year degree for Black and Hispanic kids from poorer, inner-city areas cannot be simply attributed to a logical decision. Rather, it is a result of the complex interplay of structural inequalities, limited resources, and societal constraints that disproportionately affect these groups.
To address these disparities, it is important to implement policies and initiatives that focus on providing equitable access to quality education, addressing socioeconomic barriers, and offering support systems to promote educational success for marginalized communities.
Learn more about marginalized communities here:
https://brainly.com/question/30457061
#SPJ11
Mark, age 11, Grade 6, (diagnosed with Conduct Disorder at age 5)
Mark has been in various systems since age 3. He lives with his mother and three siblings; his father left when he was 7 years old. He was diagnosed with Conduct Disorder at age 5 when he was aggressive with his sibling and classmates. He has difficulty keeping up with school work and has transferred to 4 different schools in the last 5 years.
Mark’s mother met with the teacher and social worker when he was originally diagnosed at age 5. His mother did not follow through with recommendations that were provided and does not seem to have the energy to deal with Mark. Mark has been in and out of care in the last few years. The school gets involved whenever there is a crisis.
Questions:
How would you deal with this situation? Who should be involved? What would you do to follow up?
Mark, age 11, Grade 6, has been diagnosed with Conduct Disorder since he was 5 years old. He has been in various systems since the age of 3 and has transferred to four different schools in the past five years.
It has been noted that he has difficulty with school work, has been aggressive with his siblings and classmates, and his father left when he was seven years old. Marks’s mother met with the teacher and social worker when he was first diagnosed at the age of 5, however, she did not follow through with the recommended treatments and appears to lack the energy to cope with Mark's conduct disorder. Mark has been in and out of care recently, and the school gets involved whenever there is a crisis.
The first thing to do is to get Mark's mother to attend a meeting with the social worker and the school counselor. This will help her understand Mark's situation better, what needs to be done, and what options are available. A review of Mark's previous case history should be carried out to establish what has worked in the past and what hasn't.
Mark's mother, the social worker, the school counselor, and the teachers should all be involved in addressing the situation.
After the initial meeting, a follow-up appointment should be scheduled to monitor Mark's progress. During this time, the school should keep a close eye on Mark's behavior and academic performance to ensure that he is making progress. Additional resources should be put in place to help Mark deal with his disorder and support his academic performance and social interactions. A referral to a specialized medical professional for an assessment may be required, and recommendations should be followed up on to ensure that Mark receives the best possible care.
To learn more about disorder check the link below-
https://brainly.com/question/25771019
#SPJ11
Describe Paul Taylor's biocentric ethical theory. How does Taylor support the denial of human superiority over nature? How might Taylor's explanation of what is wrong about environmental destructions differ from Thomas Hill's virtue-ethical approach? Discuss.
Paul Taylor's biocentric ethical theory is a theory that argues that all living things are intrinsically valuable, and therefore deserving of moral respect and consideration.
He believes that nature has inherent worth and that it should be protected in its own right, regardless of its instrumental value to humans. In this way, he rejects the notion of human superiority over nature, instead arguing that all living things have equal moral status. Taylor supports the denial of human superiority over nature by arguing that all living things are deserving of moral respect and consideration. He believes that humans are not inherently superior to other living things, but rather part of a larger ecological community that includes all living things. He argues that this community should be protected and preserved for its own sake, rather than solely for human benefit. Taylor's explanation of what is wrong about environmental destructions differs from Thomas Hill's virtue-ethical approach in several ways. Hill's approach focuses on the character traits and virtues that humans need to develop in order to be good environmental stewards.
He argues that environmental problems arise from a lack of virtues such as wisdom, compassion, and self-restraint, and that these virtues need to be cultivated in order to promote environmental sustainability. Taylor, on the other hand, argues that environmental destruction is wrong because it violates the intrinsic value of nature itself. He believes that nature has inherent worth that should be protected and preserved, regardless of human interests.In conclusion, Paul Taylor's biocentric ethical theory is a theory that argues that all living things are intrinsically valuable and should be protected and preserved for their own sake. He rejects the notion of human superiority over nature, arguing instead that humans are part of a larger ecological community that includes all living things. His explanation of what is wrong about environmental destructions differs from Thomas Hill's virtue-ethical approach, as he focuses on the intrinsic value of nature itself, rather than on the character traits and virtues that humans need to develop in order to be good environmental stewards.
To know more about ethical theory refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/29518919
#SPJ11
Choose any movie or television show that portrays organized crime. Discuss how the movie/tv show portrays a minimum of 3 of the following theories.
1. Alien Conspiracy Theory
2. Rational Choice Theory /Routine Activities Theory (article)
3. Psychological Traits
4. Learning Theories – Miller on Gangs and Differential Association
5. Social Disorganization Theories – Anomie and Differential Opportunity
6. Cultural Deviance Theories
7. Organizational Theory
8. Organized Crime as a Social Institution
The movie "The Godfather" portrays several theories related to organized crime. One of them is the Rational Choice Theory, where individuals engage in criminal activities based on a rational calculation of costs and benefits.
Another theory depicted in "The Godfather" is the Psychological Traits theory. The characters exhibit various psychological traits that contribute to their involvement in organized crime. For instance, Michael's transformation from a war hero to a ruthless mafia leader can be seen as influenced by his psychological disposition, including his desire for power and the need to protect his family.
Additionally, the movie highlights the Learning Theories - Miller on Gangs and Differential Association. The Corleone family operates based on a code of conduct and loyalty, passed down through generations. The younger members of the family learn the values, norms, and skills associated with organized crime through their interactions and associations within the family, illustrating the principles of differential association.
Overall, "The Godfather" portrays these theories by showcasing how rational calculations, psychological traits, and learned behaviors shape the characters' involvement in organized crime, emphasizing the complex dynamics of organized crime as a social institution.
Learn more about behaviors here:
https://brainly.com/question/8871012
#SPJ11