If ll m, find the value of each missing variable(s) .

A

John will see a wild turkey in his yard next year

John saw wild turkeys in his yard during the past 3 years. He will see wild turkeys in his yard next year.

and

Mrs. Smith notices that the first 10 students who enter her cla$s are female. Therefore, she expects that all the students in her cla$s will be female.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

First off, what is inductive and deductive reasoning?

Inductive is when you infer off of your observations. For example, "the last three cars I passed by were white, therefore the next car will also be white". The inductive reasoning is usually a broad guess. This could be right, but it isn't factual.

Deductive is when you infer based off of facts, or confirmed information. For example, "If you get 60% on a quiz, you pa$s the quiz. John got 80% percent on his quiz, therefore he passed." It is a confirmed fact that 60% is the pas$ing grade so if John got a 80%, that is more than 60% and he passes.

I hope the examples made sense!

I wrote about explaining the options but brainly is being sensitive

Answer:

The proportion of all correctly classified violins that are old is equal to the proportion of all new violins that are incorrectly classified.

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the table, we have that the correct option is:

5.)The proportion of all correctly classified violins that are old is equal to the proportion of all new violins that are incorrectly classified.

Statement 1:

15 of 33 new are correctly classified, thus, the proportion is:

[tex]p_N = \frac{15}{33} = 0.4545[/tex]

18 out of 31 old, thus:

[tex]p_O = \frac{18}{31} = 0.58[/tex]

Proportions are different, thus, statement 1 is false.

Statement 2:

13 out of 31 old are incorrectly classified, thus:

[tex]p = \frac{13}{31} = 0.4194[/tex]

Different than 0.4545, thus, statement 2 is false.

Statement 3:

Out of 31 incorrectly classified, 13 are old.

Out of 33 correctly classified, 15 are new.

Different proportions, thus, statement 3 is false.

Statement 4:

Out of the 33 new, 15 are correctly classified and 18 incorrectly, different proportions, thus, statement 4 is false.

Statement 5:

18 out of 33 correctly classified are old.

18 out of 33 new violins are incorrectly classified.

Same proportion, thus, statement 5 is true.

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/12612621

Answer:

a) 0.1818

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

The odd that it'll snow tomorrow is 9 to 6

The probability that it will snow tomorrow  [tex]=\dfrac{9}{9+6}[/tex]

[tex]=\dfrac{9}{15}[/tex]

= 0.6

The probability that it'll not snow tomorrow [tex]= 1 - \dfrac{9}{15}[/tex]

[tex]= \dfrac{15-9}{15}[/tex]

[tex]=\dfrac{6}{15}[/tex]

= 0.4

Let assume that the odd that it'll snow tomorrow is 9 to 2

The probability that it will snow tomorrow  [tex]=\dfrac{9}{9+2}[/tex]

[tex]=\dfrac{9}{11}[/tex]

= 0.8181

The probability that it'll not snow tomorrow  [tex]= 1 - \dfrac{9}{11}[/tex]

[tex]= \dfrac{11-9}{11}[/tex]

[tex]=\dfrac{2}{11}[/tex]

= 0.1818

None of the  options is correct.

Probability that it will not snow tomorrow = 0.4

The odds of an event E is defined as formulated in equation (1)

[tex]\rm Odd\; of\; event\; E = P(E)/P(\bar E) = P(E)/(1-P(E)).......(1)[/tex]

Let P(E) represents the probability that it will snow tomorrow.

Let event E represents the event that " it will snow tomorrow "

So the odds of the event that it will snow tomorrow

[tex]\rm \dfrac{P(E)}{P(\bar E)} =\dfrac{9}{6} = \dfrac{P(E)}{1-P(E)}.......(2)[/tex]

On solving equation (2) we get

[tex]\rm P(E) = \dfrac{9}{15}[/tex]

So the probability that it will snow tomorrow is 9/15

Hence the probability that it will not snow tomorrow

[tex]\rm P(\bar E) = 1- \dfrac{9}{15} = \dfrac{6}{15} =\bold{0.4}[/tex]

Probability that it will not snow tomorrow = 0.4

For more information please refer to the link below

https://brainly.com/question/7538150

Step-by-step explanation:

3/1 x 5/6 = 15/6 = 2 3/6 = 2 1/2

answer is C

Answer:

18 would be the number

Step-by-step explanation:

plz mark B R A I N L I E S T

Answer:

I think the answer is 18

Step-by-step explanation:

20-10%=18

Answer:

ŷ = 739.49X + 4876.43

y = 6755.98 - 388.24x + 125.30x²

y = 5428.98(1.09)^x

B.)

Linear:

ŷ = 739.49(9) + 4876.43

y = 11531.8

Year 2010 ; x = 10

y = 739.49(10) + 4876.43

y = 12271.3

Year 2011 ; x = 11

y = 739.49(11) + 4876.43

y = 13010.8

Quadratic :

Year 2009 ; x = 9

y = 6755.98 - 388.24(9) + 125.30(9^2)

y = 13411.1

Year 2010 ; x = 10

y = 6755.98 - 388.24(10) + 125.30(10^2)

y = 15403.6

Year 2011 ; x = 11

y = 6755.98 - 388.24(11) + 125.30(11^2)

y = 17646.6

Exponential:

Year 2009 ; x = 9

y = 5428.98(1.09)^9

y = 11791.2

Year 2010 ; x = 10

y = 5428.98(1.09)^10

y = 12852.4

Year 2011 ; x = 11

y = 5428.98(1.09)^11

y = 14009.1

Step-by-step explanation:

X :

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Y:

6231

6574

7237

7211

7701

8581

10302

11796

Using the online linear regression calculator :

The linear trend :

ŷ = 739.49X + 4876.43

Where x = year

With 2006 representing 1 ; and so on

Slope = m = 739.49

Intercept (c) = 4876.43

y = predicted variable

The quadratic model:

General form:

y = A + Bx + Cx²

y = 6755.98 - 388.24x + 125.30x²

The exponential model:

y = AB^x

y = 5428.98(1.09)^x

B.) Next three years :

Year 2009 ; x = 9

Year 2010 ; x = 10

Year 2011 ; x = 11

Linear:

ŷ = 739.49(9) + 4876.43

y = 11531.8

Year 2010 ; x = 10

y = 739.49(10) + 4876.43

y = 12271.3

Year 2011 ; x = 11

y = 739.49(11) + 4876.43

y = 13010.8

Quadratic :

Year 2009 ; x = 9

y = 6755.98 - 388.24(9) + 125.30(9^2)

y = 13411.1

Year 2010 ; x = 10

y = 6755.98 - 388.24(10) + 125.30(10^2)

y = 15403.6

Year 2011 ; x = 11

y = 6755.98 - 388.24(11) + 125.30(11^2)

y = 17646.6

Exponential:

Year 2009 ; x = 9

y = 5428.98(1.09)^9

y = 11791.2

Year 2010 ; x = 10

y = 5428.98(1.09)^10

y = 12852.4

Year 2011 ; x = 11

y = 5428.98(1.09)^11

y = 14009.1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

7.5

Answer:

if you divide [tex]\frac{2}{3}[/tex] by 5 the answer would be [tex]\frac{2}{15}[/tex]

Answer:

140

Explanation:

an=-12+4(n-2)

an=-12+4([40]-2)

an=-12+4(38)

an=-152-12

an=140

The 40th term in the sequence defined by aₙ= -12+4(n-2) is 140

using AP formula,

aₙ = a + (n - 1)d

where

a = first term

d = common difference

n = number of terms

Therefore,

aₙ = -12 + 4(n-2)

n = 40

a₄₀ = -12 + 4(40 - 2)

a₄₀ = -12 + 4(38)

a₄₀ = -12 + 152

a₄₀ = 140

The 40th term of the sequence is 140.

learn more about arithmetic progression here: https://brainly.com/question/22069667?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

13

Step-by-step explanation:

x = 3 & y = 5

2y + 3(x - y) + x² = 2*5 + 3(3 - 5) + 3²

                          = 2*5 + 3*(-2) + 3²

                         = 10 - 6 + 9

                        = 4 + 9

                        = 13

Answer:

10

Step-by-step explanation:

go to mathaway.com and type in the equation and when x=-6. Press show graph and it says 10. The graph is my proof.

Answer:

15/100

Step-by-step explanation:

6 multiples of 6 between 0-40 so we find the amount 40 goes into 100, which is 2.5, then multiply 6 by 2.5 to get 15, meaning the possibility is 15%, or 15/100

Answer: 17/20

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 6 multiples of 6 in the range 1 to 40, namely 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36. So the probability of the speaker choosing one of these multiples is 640. Therefore, by the complement rule, the probability of not choosing a multiple of 6 is 1−640=3440. Simplify to 17/20

Answer:

I am not really sure but I asume it is C honestly I am sorry if I am wrong. But if I am right I really hope this helps

Answer:

The minimum is 0 because the lowest point the line reaches is 0. The maximum is infinity because the arrow keeps going up.

Answer:

There is no max since the arrow is continuous and the minimum is zero

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

y-mx+b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Neither of the students are correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

Sarah:

P = 3x + x +7 + 3x + x +7 ..... this first step is correct

    = 6x + 14 .... this step is incorrect, Sarah forgot to add the other 2 xs

John:

P = 2(x + 7) + 2(3x)

  =  2x + 7 + 6x .... this step is incorrect, John forgot to distribute the 2 to the 7

  =  8x + 7 .... incorrect because of the previous step

The answer should've been 8x + 14.

Answer:

x=6

Step-by-step explanation:

Let X = Rob's weekly allowance

If he spent 1/2 of it on candy, then he had 1/2 of it left (1/2)X

After he earned $6 for cleaning the oven, he had $9.

So,

(1/2)X + 6 = 9

(1/2)X = 3

X = 6

Step-by-step explanation:

24=3n-15 or,25+15=3n or,39=3n or,39/3=n or,n=13 therefore the value of n is 13. I think this answer is helpful for you

Answer: n = 13

Step-by-step explanation:

24=3(n-5) - First  distribute the 3 to the n and the 5. Which you would than get 3n and -15

24=3n-15 - Now add the 15 to both sides which would cause it to cancel out on the left side of the equal side.

39=3n - Now divide the 3 from 3n on both sides of the equal side.

n=13 - Once you do that you will get n = 13. That is your answer!

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Step one:

given data

we are told that Terry's base salary is $2100  per month.

in addition 5% on sales greater than $40000.

let the monthly salary be M(s)

and let "s" be the amount of sales made

his monthly commission =0.05s

Step two:

The expression for his monthly earning is given as

M(s)=0.05s+2100   where s>40000

 hence for a month when s=42000

M(s)=0.05(42000)+2100

M(s)=2100+2100

M(s)=4200

Therefore for an instance when s=42000 his earnings  for the month will be $4200

Given:

10 workers produce 30 complex elements in 10 days.

To find:

The number of days, in which 5  workers produce 24 elements.

Solution:

According to the question, let as assume

[tex]n_1=10[/tex]

[tex]w_1=30[/tex]

[tex]d_1=10[/tex]

[tex]n_2=x[/tex]

[tex]w_2=24[/tex]

[tex]d_2=5[/tex]

where, n is number of workers, w is work done, and d is number of days.

We have, a formula,

[tex]\dfrac{n_1\times d_1}{w_1}=\dfrac{n_2\times d_2}{w_1}[/tex]

Substituting the values in the above formula, we get

[tex]\dfrac{10\times 10}{30}=\dfrac{x\times 5}{24}[/tex]

[tex]\dfrac{10}{3}=\dfrac{5x}{24}[/tex]

Isolate variable x.

[tex]\dfrac{10}{3}\times \dfrac{24}{5}=\dfrac{5x}{24}\times \dfrac{24}{5}[/tex]

[tex]\dfrac{240}{15}=x[/tex]

[tex]16=x[/tex]

Therefore, the required number of days is 16.

Answer:

1) future value = present value x [1 + (i x n)] = $300 x [1 + (3.5% x 4)] = $342

2) using the compound interest formula:

future value = $225 x (1 + 4.1%)¹°⁵ = $238.98

Using the simple interest formula doesn't yield the same answer = $225 x [1 + (4.1% x 1.5)] = $238.84. In this case it is close due to a very short period of time and low interest rate.

3) future value = present value x (1 + i)ⁿ = $1,700 x (1 + 6%)⁴ = $2,146.21

since the interest is annual, we must convert 48 months to 4 years

Answer:

the slope is 2 I am pretty sure

Answer:

explicit formula for an, the nth term of the sequence 19,24,29

[tex]a_1=19 ; \ a_n=a_{n-1}+5[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to Write an explicit formula for an, the nth term of the sequence 19,24,29

In the sequence the First term a₁= 19

Common Difference d= 5

The Formula used for explicit formula is: [tex]a_1=First \ term ; \ a_n=a_{n-1}+d[/tex]

Where d is common difference and n is nth term of sequence.

So, explicit formula for an, the nth term of the sequence 19,24,29

[tex]a_1=19 ; \ a_n=a_{n-1}+5[/tex]

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

I just took the USATP.

Answer:

D) 34.375

Step-by-step explanation:

I literally just took usatestprep yall need to stop putting wrong answers pls

Answer:

Test statistic Z= 1.713

The calculated Z- value =  1.7130 < 2.576 at 0.01 level of significance

Null hypothesis is accepted

There is no difference between the  mean annual salary of all lawyers in a city is  different from $110,000

Step-by-step explanation:

Step(i):-

A researcher wants to test if the mean annual salary of all lawyers in a city is

different from $110,000

Mean of the Population  μ = $110,000

Sample size 'n' = 53

Mean of the sample x⁻ = $114,000.

standard deviation of the Population = $17,000,

Level of significance = 0.01

Null hypothesis :

There is no difference between the  mean annual salary of all lawyers in a city is  different from $110,000

H₀:  x⁻ =  μ

Alternative Hypothesis :  x⁻ ≠  μ

Step(ii):-

Test statistic

                 [tex]Z = \frac{x^{-}-mean }{\frac{S.D}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]

                 [tex]Z = \frac{114000-110000}{\frac{17000}{\sqrt{53} } }[/tex]

                Z =  1.7130

Tabulated value Z = 2.576 at 0.01 level of significance

The calculated Z- value =  1.7130 < 2.576 at 0.01 level of significance

Null hypothesis is accepted

There is no difference between the  mean annual salary of all lawyers in a city is  different from $110,000

Answer:

s>22

Step-by-step explanation:

2s>49−5

2s>44

s>44/2

s>22

Answer: 70 degrees (i had that question got it right)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x+4; all real numbers except =-4

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x)/g(x) = (x2-16)/(x+4)

The domain is all real numbers except x = -4 (because the denominator is zero at x = -4 and division by zero is undefined.)

We can simplify by factoring the numerator:

(x2-16)/(x+4) = (x-4)(x+4)/(x+4) = (x-4)

The domain is the same as the original expression: all real numbers except x = -4