I need to find the missing angle of this triangle or whatever it is

Answer:

2/3,4/3.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

the answer is 6, this is because 4/(2/3) turns into 12/2

Answer:

82

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2(7x-4)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2(7x-4)

Step-by-step explanation:

Factor out the gratest common divisor of the coefficients of 14x - 8

Answer:

yoyo

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: the answer is yo-yo

Step-by-step explanation:

because they say the 6-yo-yo cost 15 dollars. So if you take 6 and multiply it by 2.5 it gives you 15 dollars. Hope this helps

Answer:

2:3 hope it helps.

Step-by-step explanation:

9:4

This is the answer.....

Answer:

198

Step-by-step explanation:

Bill costs 20.86

monthly fee plus cost per minute = 20.86

7 + (20.86-7) = 20.86

7+13.86=20.86

7+1386cents = 20.86

Minutes Aldo was billed = 1386÷7=198

Answer:

6n+1

Step-by-step explanation:

n=term#

Answer:

The two numbers are negative 1 and negative 9 which is -1 and -9

First, rewrite

[tex]x^y=e^{\ln x^y}=e^{y\ln x}[/tex]

[tex]5^{x-y}=e^{\ln5^{x-y}} = e^{\ln(5)(x-y)}[/tex]

Now, differentiate both sides using the chain rule:

[tex]\dfrac{\mathrm d\left(e^{y\ln x}\right)}{\mathrm dx}=\dfrac{\mathrm d\left(e^{\ln(5)(x-y)}\right)}{\mathrm dx}[/tex]

[tex]e^{y\ln x}\dfrac{\mathrm d(y\ln x)}{\mathrm dx}=e^{\ln(5)(x-y)}\dfrac{\mathrm d(\ln(5)(x-y))}{\mathrm dx}[/tex]

[tex]x^y\left(\dfrac{\mathrm dy}{\mathrm dx}\ln x+y\dfrac{\mathrm d(\ln x)}{\mathrm dx}\right)=\ln(5)5^{x-y}\left(\dfrac{\mathrm d(x)}{\mathrm dx}-\dfrac{\mathrm dy}{\mathrm dx}\right)[/tex]

[tex]x^y\left(\ln x\dfrac{\mathrm dy}{\mathrm dx}+\dfrac yx\right)=\ln(5)5^{x-y}\left(1-\dfrac{\mathrm dy}{\mathrm dx}\right)[/tex]

[tex]\left(x^y\ln x+\ln(5)5^{x-y}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm dy}{\mathrm dx}=\ln(5)5^{x-y}-yx^{y-1}[/tex]

[tex]\dfrac{\mathrm dy}{\mathrm dx}=\dfrac{\ln(5)5^{x-y}-yx^{y-1}}{x^y\ln x+\ln(5)5^{x-y}}[/tex]

Answer:No. A strong correlation does not imply causation.

Step-by-step explanation:

Cause and effect relationship is not explained by correlations. A cause and effect relationship can only be established by carrying out carefully controlled experiments.

Hence, a strong correlation between the the intake of soda and accidents does not necessarily imply that soda intake causes accident.

A lurking variable in this study may be the speed of the drivers. A lurking variable is not controlled but significantly impacts results obtained from the study.

Since the speed of the drivers is not strictly controlled, it may just be a lurking variable.

What are the expressions?

Answer:

1) P(1,0)Q(-2,3)R(-3,3)S(3,2)

2) (3,4)

3) (0,-4)

4) (1,2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

ummm where is the pic? like bruh

Answer:

48 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

Multiply 4x2x6 and get the answer of 48 cm.

Answer:

14. x=18

Step-by-step explanation:

For 14 you can see that all the angles must add up to 180.

Setup the equation 5x+2x+x=180 and solve for x

For 15 do the same thing, add up all of the lengths and substitute the missing one as W. Set them equal to 360 and you should get your answer.

Answer: so it’s 85?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Area=91 ft^2

Step-by-step explanation:

Area=length*width

Area= 14*6.5

Area=91 ft^2

Answer:

91 sq. ft.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

15 is 25% of 60.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

40 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a=53, b=90, c=37, x=53, y=90, z=37

segment ab=3, segment bc=4, segment ac=5

pretty sure these are the answers but sorry if not

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

93/5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

None

Step-by-step explanation:

Both a pound

Answer:

Same weight

Step-by-step explanation:

There is a pound of each so they weight the same :)

Answer:

The Discriminant is 25

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case, the discriminant will be given by

b ^ 2 - 4 * a * c

Where

b = 7

a = 3

c = 2

substituting

b ^ 2 - 4 * a * c = (7) ^ 2 - 4 * (3) * (2) = 25

Therefore the value of the discriminant is 25.

How many x-intercepts does this function have?

It has two intercepts with the x axis and can be found by equaling the function to zero. That is to say,

3x2 + 7x + 2 = 0

The results will be the interceptions with x.

What are the number of zeros for this function?

The number of zeros for this function is

two real number solutions

Because it is a quadratic function.

Given:

Amount after three years = $10000

Rate of interest = 8.2 percent compounded monthly = 0.082

Time = 3 years

To find:

The principal value.

Solution:

Formula for amount is

[tex]A=P\left(1+\dfrac{r}{n}\right)^{nt}[/tex]

where, P is principal, r is rate of interest, n is the number of times interest compounded in an year, t is number of years.

Substitute A=10000, r=0.082, n=12 and t=3 in the above formula.

[tex]10000=P\left(1+\dfrac{0.082}{12}\right)^{12(3)}[/tex]

[tex]10000=P\left(1+\dfrac{41}{6000}\right)^{36}[/tex]

[tex]10000=P\left(\dfrac{6041}{6000}\right)^{36}[/tex]

[tex]10000=P(1.27783)[/tex]

Divide both sides by 1.27783.

[tex]\dfrac{10000}{1.27783}=P[/tex]

[tex]7825.76712=P[/tex]

[tex]P\approx 7825.767[/tex]

Therefore, today she have to deposit $7825.767.

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Standard error is SE = σ / √n.  As n increases, SE decreases.

2. Degrees of freedom is d = n − 1.  As n increases, d increases.

3. The t statistic is t = (x − μ) / SE.  As SE decreases, t increases.

4. As n increases, t* decreases and approaches z*.

5. As the t statistic increases, the P-value decreases.

6. Margin of error is t* times SE.  As n increases, MoE decreases.

7. The width of the confidence interval is 2 MoE.  As MoE decreases, the width of the confidence interval decreases.

Answer:

A,t=d/r

Step-by-step explanation:

if d=rt t=?

d/r=rt/r (to get alone t we devided by r on both sides)

d/r=t

i think it is clear

&i hope it helps you

Answer:

B. [tex]86\,\frac{m}{s^{2}}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

From Newton's Laws of Motion, the spring is compressed against effects of weight of the person and as sping force is a restitutive force, the net force experimented by person is different from zero. By applying Second Newton's Law, we get this equation of equilibrium on person:

[tex]\Sigma F = k\cdot \Delta x -m\cdot g = m\cdot a[/tex] (Eq. 1)

Where:

[tex]k[/tex] - Spring constant, measured in newtons per meter.

[tex]\Delta x[/tex] - Change in the length of spring, measured in meters.

[tex]m[/tex] - Mass of the person, measured in meters.

[tex]g[/tex] - Gravitational acceleration, measured in meters per square second.

[tex]a[/tex] - Net acceleration of the person, measured in meters per square second.

Now we proceed to clear net acceleration:

[tex]a = \frac{k}{m}\cdot \Delta x -g[/tex]

If we know that [tex]k = 1.4\times 10^{4}\,\frac{N}{m}[/tex], [tex]m = 60\,kg[/tex], [tex]\Delta x = 0.41\,m[/tex] and [tex]g = 9.807\,\frac{m}{s^{2}}[/tex], the acceleration of the person when spring reaches its greatest compression at the bottom of their jump is:

[tex]a = \frac{1.4\times 10^{4}\,\frac{N}{m} }{60\,kg} \cdot (0.41\,m)-9.807\,\frac{m}{s^{2}}[/tex]

[tex]a = 85.859\,\frac{m}{s^{2}}[/tex]

Which corresponds to option B.