I NEED MORE HELP PLZZ

Step-by-step explanation:

convert kg into grams

1kg=1000g

1.5kg/350g=1.5×1000g/350

1500/350=300/70

=30/7

ratio will be 30:7

answer is 4.2g

The answer to the ratio is:

4.2g

First of all, we need to convert the kg to g

This can be done by multiplying the Kg by 1000

1.5kg x 1000= 1500g

Next, we solve the ratio since they are in the same parameters

This would be 1500g:350g

1500/350= 30/7.

Therefore, the ratio would be 30:7

Finally when further broken down, it would be 4.2g

Read more about ratio here:

https://brainly.com/question/13513438

The number of tables with 4 chairs are 39.

We have a café which has 60 tables. 35% of the tables have 2 chairs at each table. The remaining 65% of the tables have 4 chairs at each table.

We have to determine the number of tables having 4 chairs.

The 10% of 250 will be -

[tex]\frac{10}{100} \times 250[/tex] = 25

According to question, we have -

Percentage of tables with 2 chairs = 35%

Percentage of tables with 4 chairs = 65%

Total number of tables = 60

Therefore -

Number of tables with 2 chairs = [tex]\frac{35}{100} \times 60[/tex] = 21

Therefore, number of tables with 4 chairs will be = 60 - 21 = 39

Hence, the number of tables with 4 chairs are 39.

To solve more questions on Percentage, visit the link blow -

https://brainly.com/question/14196705

#SPJ2

There are 39 tables that have 4 chairs.

i.e. the number  of tables with 4 chairs is: 39.

Here, we have to find the number of tables that have 4 chairs, we first need to calculate how many tables have 2 chairs, and then subtract that number from the total number of tables.

Given that 35% of the tables have 2 chairs, we can calculate the number of tables with 2 chairs as follows:

Number of tables with 2 chairs = 35% of 60 tables

Number of tables with 2 chairs = 0.35 * 60

Number of tables with 2 chairs = 21 tables

Now, to find the number of tables with 4 chairs:

Number of tables with 4 chairs = Total number of tables - Number of tables with 2 chairs

Number of tables with 4 chairs = 60 tables - 21 tables

Number of tables with 4 chairs = 39 tables

So, there are 39 tables that have 4 chairs.

To learn more on percentage click:

brainly.com/question/13450942

#SPJ3

Answer:

3+1/4= 3 1/4

Hope This Helps!!!

The total fabric which Loquan has is equal to 6.5 feet.

It is given that Loquan has 2 pieces of fabric . Each of the fabric is [tex]3\frac{1}{4}[/tex] feet long.

We have to find out the total fabric in feet which Loquan does have.

What will be the total length if there are two ropes of 1 meter each ?

The total length of the rope can be calculated by multiplying no. of ropes with length of one rope and that will be equal to 2 × 1 or 2 meter.

As per the question ;

Loquan has 2 pieces of fabric , each having length of  [tex]3\frac{1}{4}[/tex] feet

The total length of fabric can be calculated by multiplying 2 with

[tex]3\frac{1}{4}[/tex] feet.

i.e.,

2 ×  [tex]3\frac{1}{4}[/tex]

= 2 × [tex]\frac{13}{4}[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{13}{2}[/tex]

= 6.5 feet

Thus , the total fabric which Loquan has is equal to 6.5 feet.

To learn more about unitary methods click here ;

https://brainly.com/question/26700669

#SPJ2

It will take 2 hours for the ambulance to pass the police car.

Given that a police car leaves a crime scene heading east directly towards the hospital at 72 kilometers per hour, and an ambulance leaves a quarter of an hour later and also heads directly east towards the hospital at 81 kilometers per hour, to determine how long will it take for the ambulance to pass the police car, the following calculation must be performed:

Therefore, it will take 2 hours for the ambulance to pass the police car.

Learn more about maths in https://brainly.com/question/25818763

Answer:

No. they have a difference in value

the first ans is 6 while the second gives 9.56

Answer:

60 inches or 5 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

36 inches + 2 feet (24 inches) = 60 inches, also 5 feet

Answer:

30 are present 10 are absent

Step-by-step explanation:

75%=3/4

so 3/4 of them are absent

3/4(40)=30

and 40-30=10 are absent

Answer:

3x2 = 6

6-4x-7

(6-4x) - 7

2x - 7 = messi ok no xd

3.5-

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex](3x-7)(x+1)[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Use the slide-and-divide method:

[tex]3x^2-4x-7[/tex]

[tex]x^2-4x-21[/tex] <-- Multiply last term by the leading coefficient 3

[tex](x-7)(x+3)[/tex] <-- Factor

[tex](3x-7)(x+1)[/tex]

Multiply:

6.15 x 21 = 129.15

Answer: C. 129.15 cm.

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

The dot on 2 is an open spot, so 2 isn't part of the solution. the arrow points towards +∞ so, yeah. b

Using the binomial distribution, it is found that there is a 0% probability that fewer that 5 in a sample of 20 pills will be acceptable.

For each pill, there are only two possible outcomes, either it is acceptable, or it is not. The probability of a pill being acceptable is independent of any other pill, which means that the binomial distribution is used to solve this question.

Binomial probability distribution

[tex]P(X = x) = C_{n,x}.p^{x}.(1-p)^{n-x}[/tex]

[tex]C_{n,x} = \frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!}[/tex]

The parameters are:

In this problem:

The probability that fewer that 5 in a sample of 20 pills will be acceptable is:

[tex]P(X < 5) = P(X = 0) + P(X = 1) + P(X = 2) + P(X = 3) + P(X = 4)[/tex]

In which

[tex]P(X = x) = C_{n,x}.p^{x}.(1-p)^{n-x}[/tex]

[tex]P(X = 0) = C_{20,0}.(0.96)^{0}.(0.04)^{20} = 0[/tex]

[tex]P(X = 1) = C_{20,1}.(0.96)^{1}.(0.04)^{19} = 0[/tex]

[tex]P(X = 2) = C_{20,2}.(0.96)^{2}.(0.04)^{18} = 0[/tex]

[tex]P(X = 3) = C_{20,3}.(0.96)^{3}.(0.04)^{17} = 0[/tex]

[tex]P(X = 4) = C_{20,4}.(0.96)^{4}.(0.04)^{16} = 0[/tex]

0% probability that fewer that 5 in a sample of 20 pills will be acceptable.

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/24863377

Answer:

3311 mililiters

Step-by-step explanation:

1 L = 1 liter = 1000 mililiters

3.311L = 3.311 liters = 3.311*1000 = 3311 mililiters

Hey there!

(-2)2 + (-42) + (18 - 23).

= -2(2) - 42 + 18 - 23

= -4 - 42 + 18 - 23

= -46 + 18 - 23

= -46 + (-5)

= -46 - 5

= -51

Therefore, your answer is: -51

Good luck on your assignment and enjoy your day!

~Amphitrite1040:)

Answer:

x=-10

Step-by-step explanation:

since there's a given 120 degrees, and it's a isosceles triangle, we know that the line adds up to 180 (where the 120 degrees is). so 120+x=180, the interior angle measures 60 degrees. That being said, the 3 angles measure 60 degrees also. now there's a right angle mark on top, so we find the angle of the smaller triangle (near angle 2) by doing 90-60=30 degrees.

angle 2 is said to be x+160, and there's a line, which tells us that they must add to 180.. so x+160+30=180

x+190=180

x=-10.

Answer:

63-|-6| = 57

Step-by-step explanation:

63-|-6|

63-6

57

Answer:

57

Step-by-step explanation:

Substitute -6 for variable h.

[tex]63-|(-6)|\\63-6\\57[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]y = \frac{2}{3} x + 2[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Start by finding the slope of the given line.

[tex]\boxed{ slope = \frac{y _{1} - y_2 }{x_1 - x_2} }[/tex]

Slope of given line

[tex] = \frac{5 - ( - 1)}{ - 2 - 2} [/tex]

[tex] = \frac{5 + 1}{ - 4} [/tex]

[tex] = \frac{6}{ - 4} [/tex]

[tex] = - \frac{3}{2} [/tex]

A perpendicular bisector cuts through the line at its midpoint perpendicularly.

The product of the slopes of two perpendicular lines is -1.

Let the slope of the perpendicular bisector be m.

[tex] - \frac{3}{2} m = - 1[/tex]

[tex]m = - 1 \div ( - \frac{3}{2} )[/tex]

[tex]m = - 1 \times ( - \frac{2}{3} )[/tex]

[tex]m = \frac{2}{3} [/tex]

[tex]y = \frac{2}{3}x + c[/tex], where c is the y-intercept.

To find the value of c, we need to substitute a pair of coordinates that lies on the perpendicular bisector into the equation. Since the perpendicular bisector passes through the midpoint of the given line, we can use the midpoint formula to find the coordinates.

[tex]\boxed{midpoint = ( \frac{x _{1} + x _2}{2} , \frac{y_1 + y_2}{2} )}[/tex]

Midpoint of given line

[tex] = ( \frac{ - 2+ 2}{2} , \frac{5 - 1}{2} )[/tex]

[tex] =( \frac{0}{2} , \frac{4}{2} )[/tex]

= (0, 2)

[tex]y = \frac{2}{3} x + c[/tex]

When x= 0, y= 2,

2= ⅔(0) +c

2= 0 +c

c= 2

Thus, the equation of the perpendicular bisector is [tex]y = \frac{2}{3} x + 2[/tex].

Answer:

S 32, W 128, M 96

Step-by-step explanation:

W = 4S

S = 1/3M, or 3S = M

S + W + M = 256

Substitute

S + 4S + 3S = 256

8S = 256, S = 32

S = 32

W = 4S = 128

M = 3S = 96

Answer:

2.17

Answer and Explanation:

The critical value of z for 97% confidence interval is 2.17, which is obtained by using a z score table, that is: {eq}P(-2.17 < Z <...

Answer:

a perpendicular line from a point on ab

71.8

71.841:

The 4 represents the number that we'll be looking at since 4 is the next position to the right of 8, 8 is in the Tenths place. 4 is in the Hundredths place, and 4 will be the only number that could round up the 8.

In order to round, we need to remember how to round numbers:

First, 4<5, meaning that 4 is less than 5.

#1 above is stating that the number to the left of 4 stays the same.

If we use that rule:

71.8 is our answer.

Answer:

c) G(x) = (x + 1)**2

Step-by-step explanation:

A function left shift is x + shift and a right shift is x - shift.

Answer:

n($6.50) + m($5.50) + k($6.00) = p

Step-by-step explanation:

n = matinee ticket

m = drink

k = popcorn

p = total cost

Without knowing the exact amount that was bought we must put a variable to show an unknown number. All of this together makes an algebraic expression.

Answer:

5.3

Step-by-step explanation:

8^2 - 6^2 = x^2

64 - 36 = x^2

28 = x^2

Square root of 28 is approx 5.3

Step-by-step explanation:

hope it will help you...

Since -4 = 4 exp(iπ), by DeMoivre's theorem and using the fact that cos and sin are both 2π-periodic,

[tex]z^4 = 4 \exp\left(i\pi\right) \implies z = 4^{1/4} \exp\left(\dfrac14 \left(i\pi + 2i\pi k\right)\right)[/tex]

where k = 0, 1, 2, or 3. Then the 4th roots of -4 are

[tex]k = 0 \implies z = 4^{1/4} \exp\left(\dfrac14 \left(i\pi+0\right)\right) = \sqrt2 \exp\left(i\dfrac\pi4\right)[/tex]

[tex]k = 1 \implies z = 4^{1/4} \exp\left(\dfrac14 \left(i\pi+2i\pi\right)\right) = \sqrt2 \exp\left(i\dfrac{3\pi}4\right)[/tex]

[tex]k = 2 \implies z = 4^{1/4} \exp\left(\dfrac14 \left(i\pi+4i\pi\right)\right) = \sqrt2 \exp\left(i\dfrac{5\pi}4\right)[/tex]

[tex]k = 3 \implies z = 4^{1/4} \exp\left(\dfrac14 \left(i\pi+6i\pi\right)\right) = \sqrt2 \exp\left(i\dfrac{7\pi}4\right)[/tex]

Answer:

pushin p

Step-by-step explanation:

pushin p

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

5 - 2 cannot be further simplified? No properties of exponents can be used due to already knowing the answer of the top of your head, it could be a mistype though, or I'm just very very d*mb.