Thomas Jefferson's support for the argument that the colonies should form their own government stemmed from his belief in individual liberty, self-governance, and the protection of natural rights. Through his writings, including the Declaration of Independence, and his advocacy for republicanism and limited government, Jefferson provided compelling arguments for the establishment of an independent government by the colonies.
Thomas Jefferson, one of the Founding Fathers of the United States, played a crucial role in supporting the argument that the colonies should form their own government. Jefferson expressed his support through various writings and actions, emphasizing principles of individual liberty, self-governance, and the rights of the people.
Jefferson's most notable contribution in support of forming a new government was his authorship of the Declaration of Independence. In this historic document, Jefferson eloquently articulated the colonists' grievances against British rule and asserted the inherent rights of individuals, such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. By declaring the colonies' independence, Jefferson provided a powerful justification for self-government and the establishment of a new political system.
In addition to the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson's political philosophy and writings further supported the argument for colonial self-government. He championed the idea of republicanism, which emphasized the importance of representative government and the participation of citizens in decision-making. Jefferson believed that a government should derive its power from the consent of the governed and that individuals should have the freedom to govern themselves.
Furthermore, Jefferson advocated for the protection of natural rights and the limitation of government power. He argued that governments are instituted to secure these rights and should be subject to the will of the people. Jefferson's emphasis on limited government and the need for checks and balances resonated with many colonists who were disillusioned with British rule and sought greater control over their own affairs.
for more questions on government
https://brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ8
If joseph Stalin had set lower production quotas for his first five year plan he would have..
Answer:he would have achieved less impressive results, but at less cost to workers.
Explanation:
.What problems were farmers facing in the late 1800s? Check all of the boxes that apply.
Answer: There were tremendous economic difficulties associated with Western farm life. First and foremost was overproduction. Because the amount of land under cultivation increased dramatically and new farming techniques produced greater and greater yields, the food market became so flooded with goods that prices fell sharply.
At the end of the 19th century, about a third of Americans worked in agriculture, compared to only about four percent today. After the Civil War, drought, plagues of grasshoppers, boll weevils, rising costs, falling prices, and high interest rates made it increasingly difficult to make a living as a farmer.
Explanation: ???Check all of the boxes that apply.???
What did robert e lee and robert anderson have in common
Robert E. Lee and Robert Anderson were both military figures who played significant roles during the American Civil War.
Robert E. Lee and Robert Anderson had a connection through their involvement in the American Civil War. They both played significant roles during the conflict, with Robert E. Lee serving as a Confederate general and Robert Anderson as a Union officer. Additionally, they were both military leaders with notable commands during key moments of the war, such as Lee's leadership of the Army of Northern Virginia and Anderson's command of the Union forces at Fort Sumter during its bombardment in 1861, which marked the beginning of the Civil War.In conclusion, the shared connection between Robert E. Lee and Robert Anderson lies in their pivotal contributions to the American Civil War, representing opposing sides as influential military figures in this historic conflict.
For more questions on Robert Anderson:
https://brainly.com/question/16748987
#SPJ8
Fill in the blank.
The one Issue that divided the country more than any other was
NEXT QUESTION
DEAD NEYT SECTION
Answer:The one issue that divided the country more than any other was
✓ slavery
Explanation:
All of the groups worked on the transcontinental railroad except:
Chinese immigrants
Indigenous groups
Irish immigrants
Civil War veterans
Answer:
The American Indians did NOT work on the railroad
Explanation:
It was illegal to: in slavery
Answer:
For a colonial to marry a slave
To legally own property as a slave
It was illegal to protect runaway slaves
Explanation:
I did k12
What was the result of President Franklin D Roosevelt want to increase the number of supreme court justices
The result of President Franklin D. Roosevelt's attempt to increase the number of Supreme Court Justices was unsuccessful. Roosevelt proposed the Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937, which aimed to add more judges to the Supreme Court in order to reduce the number of old judges who were not favorable to his New Deal policies. The bill received criticism from both parties, and the Senate Judiciary Committee voted it down in July 1937. This proposal was seen as a violation of the separation of powers, and was heavily opposed by the public.
What caused The Tuscarora War between settlers and American Indians in North Carolina
Answer:
American Indians interfered with trade between settlers and Britain.
Explanation:
The Tuscarora War, which started in North Carolina, was caused by American Indians interfering with trade between settlers and Britain
Why is the Battle of Little Bighorn often referred to as "Custer’s Last Stand"? a. The Battle of Little Bighorn resulted in the death of General Custer and all two hundred of his troops
b. The Battle of Little Bighorn was General Custer’s last battle before he retired from the military
c. The Battle of Little Bighorn was the last conflict the US military engaged in with the Plains tribes
d. The Battle of Little Bighorn was the final conflict in the wars against Indigenous peoples of the late 1800s.
a. The Battle of Little Bighorn is often referred to as "Custer's Last Stand" because it resulted in the death of General Custer and all two hundred of his troops.
The Battle of Little Bighorn is often referred to as "Custer's Last Stand" because option a is the correct answer. The battle, which took place on June 25-26, 1876, resulted in the death of General George Armstrong Custer and all two hundred of his troops. It was a significant event in the context of the American Indian Wars, specifically the conflict between the United States Army and the Plains tribes, including the Lakota Sioux, Cheyenne, and Arapaho.Custer's decision to divide his forces and attack a large encampment of Native American tribes led by Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse proved disastrous. The overwhelming numbers and strategic prowess of the Native American warriors overwhelmed Custer's troops, leading to their defeat and subsequent annihilation. Custer's death and the scale of the loss made the Battle of Little Bighorn a prominent and memorable event in American history.The term "Custer's Last Stand" has come to symbolize a heroic last stand or a final act of bravery in the face of overwhelming odds, highlighting the significance of the battle and Custer's role in it.For more questions on Battle of Little Bighorn
https://brainly.com/question/18329666
#SPJ8
How did the oneida community in new york reflect American life in the 1800s?
Answer: All Oneida Community members were expected to work, each according to his or her abilities. Women tended to do much of the domestic duties. Although more skilled jobs tended to remain with an individual member (the financial manager, for example, held his post throughout the life of the Community), Community members rotated through the more unskilled jobs, working in the house, the fields, or the various industries.
Explanation: YIPPPEE
Which Catholic order was most prominent in the early colonial
period and encouraged syncretism with mass baptisms?
a-Augustinians
b-Franciscans
c-Dominicans
d-Jesuits
The Catholic order which was most prominent in the early colonial period and encouraged syncretism with mass baptisms were the Franciscans. These religious orders were instrumental in the Spanish colonization of the Americas, in which they were used as a tool of cultural assimilation to convert indigenous peoples to Christianity.
The Catholic order which was most prominent in the early colonial period and encouraged syncretism with mass baptisms were the Franciscans. These religious orders were instrumental in the Spanish colonization of the Americas, in which they were used as a tool of cultural assimilation to convert indigenous peoples to Christianity.Franciscans were the first religious order to arrive in the Americas in 1523, and they were an essential part of the Spanish colonial project. The Franciscans' goal was to establish missions and teach Catholicism to the indigenous population. They encouraged syncretism, which is the blending of religious beliefs and practices. Mass baptisms were used to convert entire communities of indigenous people to Catholicism. They also established schools where they taught indigenous people how to read and write in Spanish. Their educational and conversion efforts were part of a larger campaign to create a more docile and controllable indigenous population that was loyal to the Spanish crown.Their efforts resulted in the cultural and religious syncretism that is present in many Latin American countries today. The Franciscans were instrumental in the colonization of Mexico, Central and South America, and the Caribbean. They played a significant role in the conversion of indigenous peoples and the establishment of the Catholic Church in the Americas.
To know more about Catholic visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31679179
#SPJ11
Voting in elections influences the U.S. government by:
A. spread lies about a politician.
B. threaten to burn down a building.
C. hire a lawyer to represent them in court.
D. publish criticism of the government.
Under the Monroe Doctrine, the United States promised to
• A. not interfere with existing European colonies in the Americas.
O B. become a colonial power with its own empire in the Americas.
• C. help European colonies in the Americas gain their independence.
D. fight any European country that sought new colonies in the Americas.
The correct answer is option D. Under the Monroe Doctrine, the United States promised to fight any European country that sought new colonies in the Americas.
Under the Monroe Doctrine, the United States promised to fight any European country that sought new colonies in the Americas. This doctrine, declared by President James Monroe in 1823, asserted that the Americas were off-limits for any further colonization by European powers. The United States positioned itself as the protector of the independent nations in the Western Hemisphere and vowed to intervene if any European power attempted to establish new colonies or interfere with the sovereignty of existing nations in the Americas. The Monroe Doctrine solidified the United States' commitment to preserving the independence and autonomy of the American nations, establishing a significant precedent in American foreign policy.In conclusion, Under the Monroe Doctrine, the United States promised to fight any European country that sought new colonies in the Americas.
For more questions on Monroe Doctrine:
https://brainly.com/question/1808198
#SPJ8
Question 47
In the 1850s, Inuit life changed when the Americans and British began exploiting the region for?
• Oil
• Whales
• Tourism
• Fur
Question 48
Which of these US States it NOT part of the West?
• California
• New Mexico
• South Dakota
• Oregon
What are 2 potential consequences/effects if the
erosion on LA's coast continues?
Answer:
It is further anticipated that by 2050, without appropriate response, coastal Louisiana will lose an additional 630,000 acres of coastal marshes, swamps, and islands. This coastal trend indicates loss of land and increased vulnerability to storms and other natural disasters.
Explanation:
Which trade route brought luxury goods from china to the rest of the world?
A. D
B. B
C. C
D. A
A historianreads a diary of a soilder from a unidentified war based on te advanced millitary technology and jungle settings the soilder described the historian determans that the diary was written during the vietnam war whic historicalthinking skill didthis histornn use t come to this conclusion
The historian used the historical thinking skill of sourcing to come to the conclusion that the diary was written during the Vietnam War.
Sourcing is the historical thinking skill that involves critically evaluating and analyzing historical sources to understand their origin, purpose, and context. In this case, the historian carefully examined the diary as a primary source and assessed its content, focusing on the descriptions of advanced military technology and jungle settings. By considering the specific details provided by the soldier, the historian was able to source the diary and determine its likely time period.
During the Vietnam War, advanced military technology played a significant role. The use of helicopters, armored vehicles, and sophisticated weaponry was prevalent during the conflict. By identifying references to advanced military technology in the diary, such as specific equipment or tactics, the historian could connect them to the historical context of the Vietnam War.
Additionally, the mention of jungle settings in the soldier's descriptions aligns with the geographical landscape of Vietnam. The dense jungles and challenging terrain were characteristic features of the war, with many military operations taking place in such environments. By sourcing the diary and considering the historical context of the Vietnam War, the historian concluded that the diary was likely written during that period.
By utilizing the sourcing skill, historians can evaluate the reliability and relevance of historical sources, enabling them to draw informed conclusions about the time period in question. It involves examining the content, context, and inherent biases of sources to gain a deeper understanding of the past.
To learn more about historian click here:
brainly.com/question/33454895
#SPJ11
Why do you think the native peoples of the Caribbean and Mexico
weren’t able to effectively resist the Spanish? What is a key
factor that stands out to you?
The native peoples of the Caribbean and Mexico were unable to effectively resist the Spanish due to several factors that played against them. The Spanish were able to defeat the native people through their advanced technology and weapons, as well as through the diseases that they brought with them.
The native peoples of the Caribbean and Mexico were unable to effectively resist the Spanish due to several factors that played against them. The Spanish were able to defeat the native people through their advanced technology and weapons, as well as through the diseases that they brought with them. In addition, the Spanish were able to gain the support of other native groups who had been oppressed by the same people they were fighting. A key factor that stands out in this situation is the technological advancements of the Spanish. They had guns, cannons, and horses, which the native people had never seen before. This gave them a significant advantage in battle, as well as in intimidating the native people. Furthermore, the Spanish had armor, which made them difficult to kill with the native people's weapons. The diseases that the Spanish brought with them were also devastating to the native people. The Spanish were immune to these diseases, but the native people were not, which led to a significant loss of life. In conclusion, the native peoples of the Caribbean and Mexico were unable to effectively resist the Spanish due to the Spanish's technological advantages and the diseases they brought with them.
To know more about technology visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9171028
#SPJ11
Do you think offshoring is a good thing for the United States?
Please explain.
Answer: While there is an obvious cost benefit to corporations, there's a greater benefit to the U.S. economy. McKinsey reports the U.S. saves about 58 cents for every dollar spent offshore. Companies can take these savings and invest them back into the economy by opening new factories and creating new jobs.
Explanation: dont write word for word
Identify which of these woman had connections to
the Quaker faith, and how this religion may have
influenced/favoured their careers in science.
Sophie Brahe
Nicole-Reine Lepaute
Caroline Herschel
Maria Mitchell
Annie Jump Cannon
Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin
Helen Sawyer Hogg
Jocelyn Bell Burnell
Answer:
Caroline Herschel had connections to the Quaker faith, which may have influenced her career in science. The Quaker religion placed a strong emphasis on education, and Herschel was encouraged to pursue her interests in astronomy by her Quaker family. In addition, the Quaker belief in gender equality may have also influenced Herschel's career, as she was able to break into a male-dominated field and become the first woman to receive a salary for scientific work.
Drag the tiles to the boxes to form correct pairs.
Match the common goals to the age specific need for financial planning
teenage years
mid-forties to fifties
mid-twenties to thirties
developing retirement plans
repaying student loan
education planning
updating retirement plans
mid-thirties to forties
Answer:
1-3
4-2
7-11
9-8
5-10
6-12
Explanation:
im him
Convincing your parents to let you stay out after your curfew is an example of
what?
A. Philosophy
B. Hyperbole
C. Rhetoric
D. Nonverbal communication
Answer:
The answer to your question would be C. Rhetoric.
Explanation:
C. Rhetoric is the correct answer because it involves using persuasive language and communication techniques to convince your parents to let you stay out after your curfew.
Fully explain the history of women entering the police force. What are the challenges that they faced and what challenges do they still face? What are the challenges women in Corrections face? What are some advantages women have in the roles of police officer, corrections officer, or probation/parole officer?
The history of women entering the police force dates back to the 1800s when police departments in the United States were mostly male-dominated. In 1845, New York City established its first police department, which excluded women, and it took more than 100 years for women to be accepted into the force.
Challenges faced by women entering the police force When women first entered the police force, they encountered numerous challenges, including gender bias, discrimination, and harassment from their male counterparts. Many of them were seen as less capable of handling dangerous and difficult situations, which was seen as a “man’s job”. Moreover, there were social stereotypes that police work was too dangerous for women and that their presence might corrupt the moral fiber of the force, which prevented many women from joining the police force. Women were also not given equal opportunities for promotion and were paid lower salaries than their male counterparts. Women's challenges in correctionsWomen in corrections face some unique challenges in their work. Many of them face the danger of sexual harassment and assault from inmates, and they also face harassment and discrimination from their male colleagues. Moreover, they also face challenges in terms of work-life balance, as they work in a highly stressful environment, which can impact their mental and physical health. Advantages of women in law enforcement women bring unique skills and attributes to the roles of the police officer, corrections officer, or probation/parole officer. Women are often better communicators, are more empathetic, and can de-escalate tense situations more effectively. They are also more likely to be non-confrontational, which can be useful in handling delicate situations. Women have proven that they are just as capable as men in law enforcement roles and that they have what it takes to excel in these professions.
know more about women entering the police force.
https://brainly.com/question/6084799
#SPJ11
In which country did fascism start, and who was the leader that started
that style of government?
Answer: It started in Italy and the leader that started it was Benito Mussolini.
Explanation: YIPPPEE
The earliest civilizations developed in the mountains
This statement is false. Instead, the correct statement is "The earliest civilizations developed in fertile river valleys, not in the mountains."
The earliest civilizations did not develop in the mountains but rather in fertile river valleys. These river valleys provided the necessary resources for agricultural practices, such as fertile soil for farming and water for irrigation. The most well-known early civilizations, such as Mesopotamia in the Tigris and Euphrates River Valley, Egypt along the Nile River, the Indus Valley civilization in present-day Pakistan and India, and the ancient Chinese civilizations along the Yellow and Yangtze Rivers, all emerged in flat or low-lying areas with access to water sources. These civilizations flourished due to the favorable conditions for agriculture, trade, and the development of complex societies.In conclusion, it is important to recognize that the earliest civilizations emerged in fertile river valleys, where access to water and fertile soil provided the foundation for agricultural prosperity and the development of complex societies.
For more questions on earliest civilizations:
https://brainly.com/question/2203731
#SPJ8
For your discussion this week I would like you to carefully review all the pieces of evidence for the theory of evolution In your initial post I would like an explanation of which piece of evidence you think the strongest piece of evidence is for evolution? How would you explain this to someone who doesn't think that evolution is occurring.
The key pieces of evidence supporting the theory of evolution include the fossil record, comparative anatomy, embryology, biogeography, and genetic evidence.
The fossil record provides a wealth of transitional fossils that demonstrate the gradual changes in species over time. Comparative anatomy reveals similarities in the bone structure and organs of different species, indicating common ancestry. Embryology shows similarities in the early stages of development among different species. Biogeography examines the distribution of species across different geographical regions, revealing patterns consistent with evolution. Genetic evidence, such as DNA sequencing, demonstrates genetic similarities and patterns of inheritance between species.
Among these pieces of evidence, genetic evidence is considered particularly strong. It provides a direct link between species and allows scientists to trace evolutionary relationships. By comparing DNA sequences, we can identify shared genetic markers and construct phylogenetic trees, showing the relatedness between different organisms.
This evidence not only supports the occurrence of evolution but also helps us understand the mechanisms and processes behind it. When explaining its significance to someone skeptical of evolution, emphasizing the robustness and consistency of genetic evidence can help illustrate the scientific consensus and the compelling case for evolutionary theory.
To know more about theory of evolution, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/30300771
#SPJ4
------------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:
"What are the key pieces of evidence supporting the theory of evolution? Which piece of evidence do you consider to be the strongest, and how would you explain its significance to someone who doubts the occurrence of evolution?"-----------------
How did the mountain ranges in the western and northern parts of China affect its development?
Answer:
The mountain ranges in the western and northern parts of China have had a significant impact on its development. These mountain ranges include the Himalayas, Kunlun Mountains, Tianshan Mountains, and Altai Mountains. They have acted as natural barriers, separating China from neighboring countries such as India, Pakistan, and Russia. This has helped to protect China from invasions and provided a sense of isolation, which has contributed to the development of a unique culture and civilization.
Additionally, the mountain ranges have influenced the climate and geography of China, affecting agriculture, transportation, and communication. For example, the Himalayas act as a barrier to the monsoon winds, which has led to the development of arid regions in the northwest. The Tianshan Mountains have created a basin and range topography, which has affected the distribution of water resources and agriculture in the region.
Explanation:
Brainliest PLssssss
Why do you think John of Leiden would want only adults, rather than infants, to receive baptism?
Answer: John of Leiden would want only adults, rather than infants, to receive baptism because he believed that baptism was a voluntary act of faith that required free will, repentance and awareness of good and evil.
Explanation: John of Leiden was a Dutch Anabaptist leader who moved to Münster in 1533 and became an influential prophet. He turned the city into a millenarian Anabaptist theocracy and proclaimed himself King of New Jerusalem in 1534. He was captured and executed by the Catholic forces in 1536.
Anabaptists were a radical branch of the Protestant Reformation that rejected infant baptism and practiced adult baptism instead. They held that infants were not punishable for sin because they had no awareness of good and evil and thus could not yet exercise free will, repent, and accept baptism. They also believed that baptism was a sign of commitment to a new life in Christ and a covenant with the community of believers.
John of Leiden shared these Anabaptist views on baptism and applied them to his rule in Münster. He denied the validity of infant baptism and accepted only adult baptism, which he regarded as a second baptism for those who had been baptized as infants by other churches. He also made baptism a requirement for citizenship in his kingdom and enforced it by confiscating the property of those who refused. He saw baptism as a way of purifying the city from sin and preparing it for the imminent return of Christ.
Therefore, John of Leiden would want only adults, rather than infants, to receive baptism because he followed the Anabaptist doctrine that baptism was a voluntary act of faith that required free will, repentance and awareness of good and evil. He also used baptism as a tool of social control and religious conformity in his kingdom.
Hope this helps, and have a great day! =)
Which of the following people would have been a member of the third estate?
OA. A wealthy nobleman
OB. A Catholic priest
OC. A poor farmer
D. Louis XVI
SUBMIT
In comparison to the clergy and nobility, the third estate included commoners like poor farmers, who made up the majority of the population. They faced economic hardships and limited privileges. OC is the correct answer
Which of the following people would have been a member of the third estate?OC is the proper answer. A poor farmer would have been a person from the third estate. Amid the Ancien Régime, there were three bequests in French society: the nobility (second estate), commoners (third estate), and clergy (first estate).
The larger part of the populace had a place in the third estate, which included artisans, laborers, agriculturists, and the urban working course. In comparison to the clergy and respectability, they had fewer political and social benefits and were subject to tall charges.
Whereas a wealthy nobleman (OA) and a Catholic priest (OB) would have a put with the primary and moment estates separately, Louis XVI (D) was the ruler and portion of the government, which was related to the consequent domestic.
LLearn more about estate here:
https://brainly.com/question/1534216
#SPJ1
The duties of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches are to
Answer: Legislative: Make Law
Executive: Enforce Law
Judicial: Interpret Law
Explanation: I've heard it over a million times.