help asappppppppppppp​

Answer: As x increases, the slope of the graph increases.

The measure of angle 1 is equal to angle  3

From the diagram, if BA is perpendicular to BD, then;

Similarly, if BC is perpendicular to BE, then;

Equating both expressions will give:

Subtract m<2 from both sides

m<1 + m<2 - m<2=  m<2 + m<3 - m<2

m<1 = m<3

Hence the measure of angle 1 is equal to angle  3

learn more on perpendicular lines here: https://brainly.com/question/1202004

Answer:

a) 3.6 × 10²

Time = distance / speed

So time = 1.08 × 10⁸ / 3 × 10⁸

= 1.08 × 10¹¹ / 3 × 10⁸ ( converted 10⁸ km to meter )

= 1.08 × 10³ / 3

= 0.36 × 10³

. = 3.6 × 10²

Time = 3.6 × 10²

Step-by-step explanation:

18.75 x 11.54

= 216.375

216.375 is the correct answer

Answer:

i think the person on top of me is correct :)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

M = -3/2

C = 1/2

Explanation:

3 x + 2 y − 1 = 0

-> 2y = 1-3x

y=-3/2x+1/2

so M = -3/2 and C = 1/2

Answer:

1. 2/3

2. 0

3. 7/2

4. -2

5. -2

6. 1

7. -4/3

8. Undefined

9. 8

10. 9/5

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The arrows on the ends of the graph mean the graph extends indefinitely left and right. The domain is the horizontal extent of the graph, so it extends from -∞ to +∞, all real numbers.

__

The upward slant of the graph at the ends is ambiguous regarding the vertical extent of the graph. It could mean either of ...

We expect the latter case would be drawn with the ends of the arrows above the peak value shown. However, oscillation tends to involve a certain symmetry, and the graph has no symmetry about the local minimum points. In short the usual clues to the vertical extent are missing. Your guess is as good as mine.

The range could be [-1, 5], or it could be [-1, ∞). We cannot tell from this graph.

_____

Additional comment

The shape of the graph does not seem to match that of a 4th-degree polynomial, so we're not at all certain what sort of function is being plotted here. (A 4th-degree polynomial gets steeper beyond the outside zeros, rather than flatter, as shown here.) A couple of different functions with the approximate characteristics shown are graphed in the attachment.

Answer:

(7,-2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

(7, - 2 )

Step-by-step explanation:

x - y = 9 ( add y to both sides )

x = y + 9 → (1)

2x + 5y = 4 → (2)

Substitute x = y + 9 into (2)

2(y + 9) + 5y = 4 ← distribute parenthesis and simplify left side

2y + 18 + 5y = 4

7y + 18 = 4 ( subtract 18 from both sides )

7y = - 14 ( divide both sides by 7 )

y = - 2

Substitute y = - 2 into (1)

x = - 2 + 9 = 7

solution is (7, - 2 )

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The answer is 27

The value of x is 4.

The perimeter of a polygon is the total length of the boundary. For a triangle, we can find it by adding the lengths of its three sides. We can find the length of the fencing required for a triangular park by finding the perimeter of the triangle.

The triangle has a perimeter of 73.

[tex]7x-2+3x+9+8x-6=73\\18x+1=73\\18x=72\\x=4[/tex]

Learn more about triangles here https://brainly.com/question/2938476

#SPJ2

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given,

No. of days taken by Jenny to read 7 books

= 8

So,

No. of days taken by her to read 1 book

[tex] = \frac{8}{7} [/tex]

Therefore,

No. of days taken by her to read 20 books

[tex] = \frac{8}{7} × 20 [/tex]

[tex] = \frac{160}{7} [/tex]

= 22.85.....

= 23 days (approx. )

Hence,

Jenny will take 23 days to read 20 books (Ans)

If Jenny can read 7 books in 8 days, exactly how many days would it take her to read 20 books?

22.85714 or 23 days

[tex]GIVEN,[/tex]

Number of books Jenny can read in 8 days = 7

[tex]NOW,[/tex]

Number of days taken by Jenny to read 1 book = [tex] \frac{8}{7} [/tex]

Number of days taken by her to read 20 books =

→ [tex]20 \times \frac{8}{7} [/tex]

→ [tex] \frac{160}{7} [/tex]

→ 22.85714 or 23 days

Answer: No!

Step-by-step explanation: This is a parabola. The graph for this function is not straight. We can also tell this is not a linear function because the degree of the function is 2.

Hope this helps :)

No.

y = 3x² + 2 has a degree of 2. So, it'll not make a graph which is a straight line. It's NOT a linear function. Linear functions have a degree of 1 or 0.

This is a quadratic polynomial (degree = 2) & when drawn on a graph, it'll make a parabola.

_____

Hope it helps ⚜

Answer:

A biconditional statement is a combination of a conditional statement Its converse written in the if and only form

Answer:

9 i believe

Step-by-step explanation:

11

12

13

21

22

23

31

32

33

Answer:

104 m^2

Step-by-step explanation:

First find the area of the rectangle.

A = 10 * 8 = 80 m^2

Then find the area of the triangle

A = 1/2 bh = 1/2 (8) *6 = 24 m^2

Add the areas together

80+24 = 104 m^2

Answer:

Acute

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]i\sqrt4 ~ \text{and} ~ 2i[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\sqrt{-4}\\\\=\sqrt{-1} \sqrt4\\\\=i\sqrt4\\\\=2i[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

well, we just do the multiplication and simplify by combining terms with the same base :

10(-5x + 3) - 2x = -50x + 30 - 2x = -52x + 30

Hence, -52x + 30 is the evaluated expression.

Hoped this helped.

38942390785289037x34809238749028

Hope you could get an idea from here.

Doubt clarification - use comment section

Answer:

X=5

Y=3

(5,3)

Step-by-step explanation:

Solve using substitution

1903

pls mark brainliest

if u want

Answer:

19039

Step-by-step explanation:

hope that help mark me brinilylist

you need to explain more

it was easy

Answer:

[tex]4x+6y[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]2\left(2x+3y\right)[/tex]

[tex]2\times \:2x+2\times \:3y[/tex]

[tex]4x+6y[/tex]

[tex]\boxed{\bold {HOPE\: IT\: HELPS\: :)}}[/tex]

Answer:

let me check....

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Increasing

Step-by-step explanation:

As we go further on the x-axis, we can see the Y value going up, thereforth it is increasing

Answer:

No! Brendan has totally got the wrong idea.

Step-by-step explanation:

Numbers on the right hand side of zero are said to be positive, while, the numbers on the opposite side are said to be negative.

That means Brendan's correct in saying that -1/3 lies on the opposite side of 3, since negative numbers lie on the opposite side of the positives.

But,

Negative "of" a number is the same number with opposite sign.

That is, if a number is 3 units away from the zero, it's negative will also be 3 units away from zero, but on the opposite side.

-1/3 and 3 do not lie at the same distance from zero.

-1/3 would be approached before -1 by walking in the negative direction whereas 3 would be approached after 1.

Therefore, Brendan is wrong as the negative of a number has opposite sign but same "magnitude".