Determine the domain of the following graph:

Answer:

127

Step-by-step explanation:

Angle C+Angle D=Angle ABC

Since C+D+CBD=180 and ABC+CBD=180

subtract getting C+D-CBD=0 and C+D=CBD

so 67+60=127 which is your answer

*Just to clarify, when i said C and D, i meant angle C and angle D

Answer:

(a)  $556 billion

(b)  $581 billion

(c)  $693 billion

Step-by-step explanation:

The given function is:

[tex]\boxed{A(x)=314e^{0.044x}}[/tex]

where A(x) is the assets (in billions of dollars) for a financial firm .

If x = 7 corresponds to the year 2007 then:

Therefore, to find the assets for each of the given years, substitute the corresponding value of x into the function.

[tex]\begin{aligned}A(13)&=314e^{0.044 \cdot 13}\\&=314e^{0.572}\\&=314(1.77180712...)\\&=556.34743707...\\&=556\; \sf (nearest\;billion)\end{aligned}[/tex]

[tex]\begin{aligned}A(14)&=314e^{0.044 \cdot 14}\\&=314e^{0.616}\\&=314(1.851507181...)\\&=581.3732549...\\&=581\; \sf (nearest\;billion)\end{aligned}[/tex]

[tex]\begin{aligned}A(18)&=314e^{0.044 \cdot 18}\\&=314e^{0.792}\\&=314(2.20780762...\\&=693.2515954...\\&=693\; \sf (nearest\;billion)\end{aligned}[/tex]

To find the experimental probability of rolling a number greater than 10, we need to determine the frequency of rolling a number greater than 10 and divide it by the total number of rolls.

Looking at the table, we can see that the frequency for rolling a number greater than 10 is the sum of the frequencies for rolling 11 and 12.

Frequency for rolling a number greater than 10 = Frequency of 11 + Frequency of 12

Frequency for rolling a number greater than 10 = 15 + 17 = 32

The total number of rolls is given as 200.

Experimental Probability of rolling a number greater than 10 = Frequency for rolling a number greater than 10 / Total number of rolls

Experimental Probability of rolling a number greater than 10 = 32 / 200

Experimental Probability of rolling a number greater than 10 = 0.16 or 16%

Therefore, the experimental probability of rolling a number greater than 10 is 16%.

Hopes this helps you out :)

The correct expression that is equivalent to (f + g) (4) is: f(4) + g(4).

The expression (f + g) (4) represents the sum of two functions, f(x) and g(x), evaluated at x = 4. To find the equivalent expression, we need to simplify it.

In (f + g) (4), the parentheses indicate that the addition operation is performed first, adding the functions f(x) and g(x) together. Then, the resulting sum is evaluated at x = 4. So, the expression simplifies to f(4) + g(4), where we substitute x with 4 in both functions.

The other options provided:

• ¡(4) + g(4): This option is not correct because the negation operator (!) applied to a value does not make sense in this context.

• f(x) + g(4): This option is not correct because it does not evaluate the sum of the functions at x = 4; it keeps the variable x in the expression.

• ¡(4 + g(4)): This option is not correct because it applies the negation operator to the sum of 4 and g(4), which is not equivalent to (f + g) (4).

• 4(f(x) + g(x)): This option is not correct because it introduces a constant factor of 4 to the sum of the functions, which is not equivalent to (f + g) (4).

The correct expression equivalent to (f + g) (4) is f(4) + g(4).

For more such questions on expression

https://brainly.com/question/723406

#SPJ8

This option is not equivalent to (f + g)(4).

The expression (f + g)(4) specifically represents the sum of functions f and g evaluated at x = 4.

To determine which expression is equivalent to (f + g)(4), let's break it down step by step.

The expression (f + g)(4) represents the value obtained by evaluating the sum of functions f and g at x = 4.

We substitute x = 4 into both functions and then add the results.

Let's evaluate each option to see which one matches this process:

¡(4) + g(4):

This option involves evaluating the function f at x = 4 and adding it to the value obtained by evaluating function g at x = 4.

It does not represent the sum of the functions f and g evaluated at x = 4.

This option is not equivalent to (f + g)(4).

f(x) + g(4):

This option involves adding the value of function f at an arbitrary point x to the value obtained by evaluating function g at x = 4.

It does not specifically represent the sum of functions f and g evaluated at x = 4.

This option is not equivalent to (f + g)(4).

¡(4 + g(4)):

This option involves evaluating the function g at x = 4 and adding it to the value obtained by adding 4 to the result.

It does not represent the sum of functions f and g evaluated at x = 4.

This option is not equivalent to (f + g)(4).

4(f(x) + g(x)):

This option involves evaluating the functions f and g at an arbitrary point x, summing the results and then multiplying the sum by 4.

It does not specifically represent the sum of functions f and g evaluated at x = 4.

None of the given options is equivalent to (f + g)(4).

For similar questions on equivalent

https://brainly.com/question/29754038
#SPJ8

Answer:

y = π/3

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the value of y, we can use the trigonometric identity for the sum of angles:

sin(x + y) = sin x * cos y + cos x * sin y

Comparing this with the given equation:

sin(x + y) = 1/2(sin x) + √3/2(cos x)

We can equate the corresponding terms:

sin x * cos y = 1/2(sin x) ----(1)

cos x * sin y = √3/2(cos x) ----(2)

From equation (1), we can see that cos y = 1/2.

From equation (2), we can see that sin y = √3/2.

To determine the values of y, we can use the trigonometric values of cosine and sine in the first quadrant of the unit circle.

In the first quadrant, cos y is positive, so cos y = 1/2 corresponds to y = π/3 (60 degrees).

Similarly, sin y is positive, so sin y = √3/2 corresponds to y = π/3 (60 degrees).

Therefore, the value of y is y = π/3 (or 60 degrees).

The exponential decay function that satisfies the given conditions is:

[tex]f(x) = 4 * (1/2)^x[/tex].

In this equation, the y-intercept is 4, which means that when x = 0, the function value is 4. As x increases by 1, the function decreases by a factor of one-half. This behavior is captured by raising 1/2 to the power of x in the equation.

The base of the exponent, 1/2, ensures that the function decreases exponentially. When x = 1, the exponent becomes 1, and[tex]1/2^1[/tex] equals 1/2. This means that the function value decreases to half of its previous value. Similarly, when x = 2, the exponent becomes 2, and[tex]1/2^2[/tex] equals 1/4. The function value decreases to one-fourth of its previous value, and so on.

By multiplying the exponential term by 4, we ensure that the y-intercept is 4. This scaling factor allows us to control the initial value of the function and match the given condition.

The exponential decay function[tex]f(x) = 4 * (1/2)^x[/tex] represents a decaying process where the y-values decrease exponentially as x increases, while starting at a y-intercept of 4.

For more such questions on exponential decay function

https://brainly.com/question/12139640

#SPJ8

The solution to the inequality f(x) > -5 is x < -5 or x > -1.

To solve the inequality f(x) > -5 for the quadratic function f(x) = x^2 + 6x, we need to find the values of x that satisfy the inequality.

First, set up the inequality:

x^2 + 6x > -5

Next, move all terms to one side of the inequality to get a quadratic expression:

x^2 + 6x + 5 > 0

To solve this quadratic inequality, we can factor it:

(x + 5)(x + 1) > 0

Now, we need to determine the sign of the expression for different intervals on the x-axis.

a) When x < -5:

If x is less than -5, both (x + 5) and (x + 1) are negative, so their product is positive.

Thus, the inequality is satisfied for x < -5.

b) When -5 < x < -1:

If x is between -5 and -1, (x + 5) is positive, but (x + 1) is negative. The product of a positive and a negative number is negative.

Thus, the inequality is not satisfied for -5 < x < -1.

c) When x > -1:

If x is greater than -1, both (x + 5) and (x + 1) are positive, so their product is positive.

Thus, the inequality is satisfied for x > -1.

Therefore, x -5 or x > -1 is the answer to the inequality f(x) > -5.

In summary:

x < -5 or x > -1.

for such more question on inequality

https://brainly.com/question/17448505

#SPJ8

Answer:

3x - x²

Step-by-step explanation:

x(3 - x)

each term in the parenthesis is multiplied by the x outside. This is called the Distributive law

= (x × 3) + (x× - x)

= 3x + (- x²)

= 3x - x²

The answer is:

Work/explanation:

To simplify this expression, we will use the distributive property:

[tex]\sf{x(3-x)}[/tex]

Distribute the x:

[tex]\sf{x\cdot3-x\cdot x}[/tex]

[tex]\sf{3x-x^2}[/tex]

Answer:

? = 220°

Step-by-step explanation:

the measure of the inscribed angle QRS is half the measure of its intercepted arc QS , then

QS = ? = 2 × QRS = 2 × 110° = 220°

A "⊂-maximal element" in set theory refers to an element in a set that cannot be strictly contained within any other element of the set, indicating a maximum extent or boundary within that set.

In the context of set theory and Tarski's notion of finiteness, a "⊂-maximal element" refers to an element within a set that cannot be strictly contained within any other element of the set. Let's break down the meaning of this term.

Consider a set S and a partial order relation ⊆ (subset relation) defined on the power set P(S) of S. A "⊂-maximal element" u of a set A ⊆ S is an element that is not strictly contained within any other element of A with respect to the subset relation. In other words, there is no element v in A such that u is a proper subset of v.

Formally, for any u ∈ A, if there is no v ∈ A such that u ⊂ v, then u is a ⊂-maximal element of A. This means that u is as large as possible within A and cannot be extended by including additional elements.

In the context of T-finite sets, the existence of a ⊂-maximal element in every nonempty subset of the set guarantees that the set has a well-defined structure and does not continue indefinitely without boundaries.

It ensures that there is a definitive maximum element within each subset, which is a key characteristic of finiteness.

For more such question on theory. visit :

https://brainly.com/question/13458417

#SPJ8

Answer:

statmen there for this should me solved and abcd are proof

reason bcz this is not equal square

The equation of the line in standard form is 3x + y - 4 = 0.

To find the equation of a line passing through two points, we can use the slope-intercept form of a linear equation, which is given by y = mx + b, where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept.

Given the points S(, 1) and T(, 4), we need to determine the slope (m) and the y-intercept (b).

The slope (m) can be found using the formula m = (y2 - y1) / (x2 - x1), where (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) are the coordinates of the two points.

Substituting the values, we get:

m = (4 - 1) / ( - ) = 3 / ( - ) = -3

Now that we have the slope, we can substitute it into the equation y = mx + b and use one of the given points to solve for the y-intercept (b).

Using the point S(, 1):

1 = (-3)(1) + b

1 = -3 + b

b = 4

Therefore, the equation of the line passing through the points S and T is:

y = -3x + 4

Converting it to standard form Ax + By + C = 0, we rearrange the equation:

3x + y - 4 = 0

For more such questions on standard form

https://brainly.com/question/19169731

#SPJ8

Answer:

We have to multiply everything to find the amount of different possible outcomes so 3*7*8*4 = 672 unique outfits

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps!

The probability of event A occurring given that event B has not occurred (P(A\B)) is 0.

To find P(A\B), we need to calculate the probability of event A occurring given that event B has not occurred. In other words, we want to find the probability of A happening when B does not happen.

The formula to calculate P(A\B) is:

P(A\B) = P(A∩B') / P(B')

Where B' represents the complement of event B, which is the event of B not occurring.

Given that P(A∩B) = 3/7 and P(B) = 7/8, we can find P(A∩B') and P(B') to calculate P(A\B).

To find P(B'), we subtract P(B) from 1, since the sum of the probabilities of an event and its complement is always equal to 1.

P(B') = 1 - P(B)

      = 1 - 7/8

      = 1/8

Now, to find P(A∩B'), we need to subtract P(A∩B) from P(B'):

P(A∩B') = P(B') - P(A∩B)

        = 1/8 - 3/7

        = 7/56 - 24/56

        = -17/56

Since the probability cannot be negative, we can conclude that P(A∩B') is 0.

Finally, we can calculate P(A\B) using the formula:

P(A\B) = P(A∩B') / P(B')

      = 0 / (1/8)

      = 0

Therefore, the probability of event A occurring given that event B has not occurred (P(A\B)) is 0.

for more such question on probability visit

https://brainly.com/question/251701

#SPJ8

The derivative dy/dx of the implicit equation[tex]x - 2xy + x^2y + y = 10[/tex] is given by[tex]\frac{(2y - 2 + 2xy)}{(-2x + x^2 + 1)}[/tex]

To find the derivative dy/dx of the implicit equation [tex]x - 2xy + x^2y + y =[/tex]10, we will use the implicit differentiation technique.

Step 1: Differentiate both sides of the equation with respect to x.

For the left-hand side:

[tex]d/dx (x - 2xy + x^2y + y) = d/dx (10)[/tex]

Taking the derivative of each term separately:

[tex]d/dx (x) - d/dx (2xy) + d/dx (x^2y) + d/dx (y) = 0[/tex]

Step 2: Apply the chain rule to the terms involving y.

The chain rule states that if we have y = f(x), then dy/dx = dy/du * du/dx, where u = f(x).

For the term 2xy, we have y = f(x) = xy. Applying the chain rule, we get:

[tex]d/dx (2xy) = d/dx (2xy) * dy/dx[/tex]

= 2y + 2x * dy/dx

Similarly, for the term x^2y, we have [tex]y = f(x) = x^2y.[/tex]Applying the chain rule:

[tex]d/dx (x^2y) = d/dx (x^2y) * \frac{dx}{dy} \\= 2xy + x^2 * \frac{dx}{dy}[/tex]

Step 3: Substitute the derivatives back into the equation.

[tex]d/dx (x) - (2y + 2x * dy/dx) + (2xy + x^2 * dy/dx) + d/dx (y) = 0[/tex]

Simplifying the equation:

[tex]1 - 2y - 2x * \frac{dx}{dy} + 2xy + x^2 * \frac{dx}{dy} + \frac{dx}{dy} = 0[/tex]

Step 4: Group the terms involving dy/dx together and solve for dy/dx.

Combining the terms involving dy/dx:

[tex]-2x * \frac{dx}{dy} + x^2 * \frac{dx}{dy} + dy/dx = 2y - 1 + 2xy - 1[/tex]

Factoring out dy/dx:

[tex](-2x + x^2 + 1) * \frac{dx}{dy} = 2y - 1 + 2xy - 1[/tex]

[tex]dy/dx = \frac{(2y - 2 + 2xy)}{(-2x + x^2 + 1)}[/tex]

For more suvh questions on derivative visit:

https://brainly.com/question/23819325

SPJ8

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

x + 2-3

|x ≥ 1

|x + 2 ≤ -3

x + 22 -6

The statistical questions for this problem are given as follows:

A question is classified as statistical if it can receive answers of data that vary, that is, questions that do not have an exact answer.

When the answer is exact, it must be composed by a set of data, such as the number of students that like football in each school, the number will vary for each school.

More can be learned about statistical questions at brainly.com/question/22334957

#SPJ1

Given, Juan y Roberto is two brothers who play Rock, Paper, and Scissors to determine who does the cleaning in their room. The total number of possible outcomes is 3. The possible outcomes are rock, paper, and scissors. So, the probability of Juan not doing the cleaning is 1/2 or 50 percent.

The probability that Juan will not do the cleaning is 1/2 or 50 percent. The possible outcomes for playing the game Rock, paper, and Scissors are given as follows. Rock can break scissors, Paper can cover rock, and Scissors can cut paper. Therefore, there are three possible outcomes in this game. The possible outcomes are rock, paper, and scissors.

The probability that Juan will not do the cleaning is 1/2 or 50 percent since there are two possible outcomes where Juan does not do the cleaning. The two possible outcomes are paper and scissors. Juan can pick the paper or scissors to win. Therefore, the probability of Juan not doing the cleaning is 1/2 or 50 percent.

For more questions on: probability

https://brainly.com/question/30390037

#SPJ8    

The final answer after evaluating the expression 3.14([tex]a^{2}[/tex] + ab) (by putting the value a = 3 and b = 4) is 65.94.

When a = 3 and b = 4, we substitute the supplied values into the expression to assess 3.14([tex]a^{2}[/tex] + ab):

3.14([tex]3^{2}[/tex] + 3 * 4)

We begin by solving the exponent:

[tex]3^{2}[/tex] = 3 * 3 = 9

The values are then entered into the expression:

3.14(9 + 3 * 4)

Inside the brackets, multiply the result:

3.14(9 + 12)

The numbers in the brackets are added:

3.14(21)

The decimal number is now multiplied by 21:

3.14 * 21 = 65.94

The evaluated expression is 65.94 as a result.

Mathematical expressions consist of at least two numbers or variables, at least one arithmetic operation, and a statement. It's possible to multiply, divide, add, or subtract with this mathematical operation.

know more about Mathematical expressions click here;

https://brainly.com/question/30350742

The answer is:

Work/explanation:

We're asked to evaluate the expression [tex]\sf{3.14(a^2+ab)}[/tex] for a = 3 and b = 4.

Plug in the data:

[tex]\sf{3.14(3^2+3*4)}[/tex]

[tex]\sf{3.14(9+12)}[/tex]

[tex]\sf{3.14(21)}[/tex]

[tex]\bf{65.94}[/tex]

i) the original distance when the lighthouse is due West of the ship is 7 km

ii) The time in minutes when the lighthouse is due West of the ship is 21 minutes

iii) The distance in km of the ship from the lighthouse when the lighthouse is due West of the ship is 29.97 km

To solve this problem, we'll use the concepts of relative velocity and trigonometry. Let's break down the problem into three parts:

i) Finding the original distance when the lighthouse is due West of the ship:

The ship's velocity is given as 21 km/h at a bearing of 052°. Since the ship observed the lighthouse due North, we know that the angle between the ship's initial heading and the lighthouse is 90°.

To find the distance, we'll consider the ship's velocity in the North direction only. Using trigonometry, we can determine the distance as follows:

Distance = Velocity * Time = 21 km/h * (20 min / 60 min/h) = 7 km (to three significant figures).

ii) Finding the time in minutes when the lighthouse is due West of the ship:

To find the time, we need to consider the change in angle from 052° to 312°. The difference is 260° (312° - 052°), but we need to convert it to radians for calculations. 260° is equal to 260 * π / 180 radians. The ship's velocity in the West direction can be calculated as:

Velocity in West direction = Velocity * cos(angle) = 21 km/h * cos(260 * π / 180) ≈ -19.98 km/h (negative because it's in the opposite direction).

To find the time, we can use the formula:

Time = Distance / Velocity = 7 km / (19.98 km/h) = 0.35 h = 0.35 * 60 min = 21 minutes (to three significant figures).

iii) Finding the distance in km of the ship from the lighthouse when the lighthouse is due West of the ship:

We can use the formula for relative velocity to find the distance:

Relative Velocity = sqrt((Velocity in North direction)² + (Velocity in West direction)²)

Using the values we calculated earlier, we have:

Relative Velocity = sqrt((21 km/h)² + (-19.98 km/h)²) ≈ 29.97 km/h (to three significant figures).

Therefore, the ship is approximately 29.97 km away from the lighthouse when the lighthouse is due West of the ship.

For more question on distance visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30395212

#SPJ8

Answer:

This equation is always false

Step-by-step explanation:

3(x - 4) + 2x = 5x  - 9

3x - 12 + 2x = 5x -9

5x - 12 = 5x - 9

5x - 5x = -9 + 12

0 = 3

This equation is always false

Answer:

perimeter ≈ 58.3 units

Step-by-step explanation:

the perimeter of the sector includes 2 radii and the arc

perimeter = 4 + 4 + 16π = 8 + 16π ≈ 58.3 ( to 1 decimal place )

The volume of the cube with a diagonal of 4√2 is 64 cubic units.

To find the volume of a cube, we need to know the length of its side. In this case, we are given the length of the diagonal, which we can use to find the side length.

Let's assume the side length of the cube is represented by "s". We know that the diagonal of a cube forms a right triangle with two sides of equal length, which are the sides of the cube.

Using the Pythagorean theorem, we can set up the equation:

s² + s² = (4√2)²

Simplifying the equation:

[tex]2s² = 32[/tex]

Dividing both sides by 2:

[tex]s² = 16[/tex]

Taking the square root of both sides:

[tex]s = 4[/tex]

Now that we have the side length of the cube, we can find the volume by cubing the side length:

Volume = s³ = 4³ = 64 cubic units.

Therefore, the volume of the cube with a diagonal  of 4√2 is 64 cubic units.

For more questions on cube

https://brainly.com/question/28776132

#SPJ8

The volume of the cube whose diagonal is 4√2 is 128√2 cubic units.

To find the volume of a cube, we need to know the length of its side. Given that the diagonal of the cube is 4√2, we can use this information to determine the side length.

In a cube, the diagonal is related to the side length (s) by the equation:

diagonal = s√3

The given diagonal is 4√2. So we can set up the equation:

4√2 = s√3

To find s, we can divide both sides of the equation by √3:

s = (4√2) / √3

To simplify this expression, we can rationalize the denominator by multiplying both the numerator and denominator by √3:

s = (4√2 ׳ √3) / (√3 × √3)

s = (4√6) / √3

Now, let's calculate the value of s:

s = (4√6) / √3

s = (4/√3) × √6

s = (4/√3) × (√3 × √2)

s = 4√2

So the side length of the cube is 4√2.

Now, to calculate the volume of the cube, we use the formula:

Volume = side^3

Volume = (4√2)³

Volume = 4³ × (√2)³

Volume = 64 × 2√2

Volume = 128√2

For similar questions on volume of the cube

https://brainly.com/question/1972490

#SPJ8

Answer:

To evaluate the expression when a = 5 and b = 1, we substitute the values into the expression:

12 + 2(4(5)²) ÷ 7 + 8

= 12 + 2(4 * 25) ÷ 7 + 8 (Note: 5² means 5 raised to the power of 2)

= 12 + 2(100) ÷ 7 + 8 (Note: 4 * 25 = 100)

= 12 + 200 ÷ 7 + 8

= 12 + 28.57 + 8 (Note: ÷ means divide)

= 48.57

To plot the resulting value on the provided number line , we would need to know the scale and range of the number line. Without this information, we cannot accurately plot the value.

Step-by-step explanation:

By applying the algebraic identity, the expression (24)³ - (13)³ - (11)³ can be simplified as (11)(1057) - (11)³ = 10396, without actually calculating the cubes.

The expression (24)³ - (13)³ - (11)³ can be evaluated without calculating the cubes by applying the concept of algebraic identities.

By using the identity (a³ - b³) = (a - b)(a² + ab + b²), we can rewrite the expression as (24 - 13)(24² + 24*13 + 13²) - (11)³.

Simplifying further, we have (11)(576 + 312 + 169) - (11)³.

Combining like terms, the expression evaluates to (11)(1057) - (11)³.

Finally, we can simplify to obtain the result of 11 multiplied by 1057 minus 11 cubed, without actually calculating the cubes. The simplified expression (24)³ - (13)³ - (11)³ evaluates to 10396.

Learn more about Evaluation without Calculating Cubes on:

https://brainly.com/question/18040006

#SPJ1

Answer:

[tex]\displaystyle \pi\biggr(1-\frac{1}{e}\biggr)[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Shell Method (Vertical Axis)

[tex]\displaystyle V=2\pi\int^b_ar(x)h(x)\,dx[/tex]

Radius: [tex]r(x)=x[/tex]

Height: [tex]h(x)=e^{-x^2}[/tex]

Bounds: [tex][a,b]=[0,1][/tex]

Set up and evaluate integral

[tex]\displaystyle V=2\pi\int^1_0xe^{-x^2}\,dx[/tex]

[tex]\displaystyle V= -\frac{1}{2}\cdot2\pi\int^{-1}_0e^u\,du\\\\V= -\pi\int^{-1}_0e^u\,du\\\\V=\pi\int^0_{-1}e^u\,du\\\\V=\pi e^u\biggr|^0_{-1}\\\\V=\pi e^0-\pi e^{-1}\\\\V=\pi-\frac{\pi}{e}\\\\V=\pi\biggr(1-\frac{1}{e}\biggr)[/tex]

"1/49," accurately represents the result of Urvi's work.The correct answer is option D.

Urvi's work is accurate and follows the correct rule of "multiply by the reciprocal" to solve the fraction division problem.

In the given problem, she is dividing 14 by the fraction 2/7. According to the rule, to divide a fraction by another fraction, we multiply the first fraction by the reciprocal of the second fraction.

In Urvi's work, she first takes the reciprocal of 2/7, which is 7/2. Then, she multiplies 14 by the reciprocal, which gives us (14 * 7/2).

Simplifying the multiplication, we get 98/2, which simplifies further to 49. Therefore, the correct answer to the fraction division problem is 1/49.

Option D, which states "1/49," accurately represents the result of Urvi's work. This option is the most accurate description of her work because it correctly shows the final simplified fraction after applying the "multiply by the reciprocal" rule.

Overall, Urvi's work demonstrates a correct understanding and application of the rule for solving fraction division problems.

For more such questions on Urvi's,click on

https://brainly.com/question/12382709

#SPJ8

The Probable question may be:
Urvi solved a fraction division problem using the rule “multiply by the reciprocal.” Her work is shown below.

A StartFraction 14 divided by StartFraction 2 Over 7 EndFraction.

B. StartFraction 1 Over 14 EndFraction times

C. StartFraction 2 Over 7 EndFraction = StartFraction 2 Over 98

D. EndFraction or StartFraction 1 Over 49 EndFraction

Which is the most accurate description of Urvi’s work?

The sum of the two time durations is 7 hours, 46 minutes, and 37 seconds.

To add the given time durations, we start by adding the seconds:

12 sec + 25 sec = 37 sec.

Since 60 seconds make a minute, we carry over any excess seconds to the minutes place, which gives us a total of 37 seconds. Moving on to the minutes, we add 30 min + 16 min = 46 min.

Again, we carry over any excess minutes to the hours place, resulting in a total of 46 minutes.

Finally, we add the hours: 5 hr + 2 hr = 7 hr.

Thus, the sum of the two time durations is 7 hours, 46 minutes, and 37 seconds.

for such more question on time

https://brainly.com/question/23377525

#SPJ8