constrict a quaderateral that has 2 pairs of parallel sides and at least 2 angles mesuring 45 deggres and 135 degrees label all angle side lengths what did you draw?


PLEASE HELP ME WITH DETAILSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The lines JT for both circles are tangents to the circles O, hence;

5a). JT = √32 or 5.7

5b). JT = 4

The tangent to a circle theorem states that a line is tangent to a circle if and only if the line is perpendicular to the radius drawn to the point of tangency

5a). If JO = 6 and OT = 2, then;

JT = √(6² - 2²) {by Pythagoras rule}

JT = √(36 - 4)

JT = √32 or 5.6569

5b). OT is also a radius as KO, so OT = 3. If JK = 2 and KO = 3, then;

JT = √(5² - 3²)

JT = √(25 - 9)

JT = √16

JT = 4.

In conclusion, for the lines JT tangent to the circles O, we have that;

5a). JT = √32 or 5.7

5b). JT = 4

Read more about tangent to a circle here:https://brainly.com/question/11067500

#SPJ1

Answer:

  7

Step-by-step explanation:

You want the tangent lengths from point D for ∆DEF circumscribing a circle, given DE=15, DF=12, DF=13.

The lengths of the tangent segments from vertex D are ...

  d = (DE +DF -EF)/2 = (15 +12 -13)/2 = 7

The tangent segments with end point D are 7 units long.

__

Additional comment

The tangents from each point are the same length, so we have ...

  d + e = DE . . . . where d, e, f are the lengths of the tangents from D, E, F

  e + f = EF

  d + f = DF

Forming the sum shown above, we have ...

  DE +DF -EF = (d +e) +(d +f) -(e +f) = 2d

  d = (DE +DF -EF)/2 . . . . as above

The other tangents are e = 8, f = 5.

The cost of 300 bricks is equal to $1,512.

In Mathematics and Geometry, the volume of a rectangular prism can be calculated by using the following formula:

Volume of a rectangular prism = L × W × H

Where:

By substituting the given dimensions (parameters) into the formula for the volume of a rectangular prism, we have;

Volume of bricks = 8 × 3 × 3

Volume of bricks = 72 cubic inches.

For the cost per cubic inch, we have:

Cost per cubic inch = 72 × 0.07

Cost per cubic inch = $5.04

For the cost of 300 bricks, we have:

Cost of 300 bricks = 300 × $5.04

Cost of 300 bricks = $1,512

Read more on volume of bricks here: https://brainly.com/question/26857231

#SPJ1

If p and q are odd primes and pq = 13 (mod 16), then one of p and q is congruent to 1 (mod 4) and the other is congruent to 3 (mod 4).

We can see this by noting that if p and q are both congruent to 1 (mod 4), then their product would be congruent to 1 (mod 4), which is not possible since pq = 13 (mod 16). Similarly, if p and q are both congruent to 3 (mod 4), then their product would be congruent to 1 (mod 4), which is also not possible since pq = 13 (mod 16).

Therefore, the only possibility is that one of p and q is congruent to 1 (mod 4) and the other is congruent to 3 (mod 4).

We cannot determine whether p and q are both congruent to 1 (mod 4) or both congruent to 3 (mod 4) based on the given information. Therefore, we cannot say for sure whether p and q are congruent to 1 (mod 4), congruent to 3 (mod 4), or one is congruent to 1 (mod 4) and the other is congruent to 3 (mod 4).

To know more about congruent,

https://brainly.com/question/28600396

#SPJ11

a. The results suggest that the drug is effective in reducing the mean wake time from 100.0 min before treatment.

b. The 90% confidence interval estimate of the mean wake time after treatment is (66.58, 91.82) minutes.

c. The results suggest that the drug is effective since the entire 90% confidence interval lies below the mean wake time of 100.0 min before treatment.


1. Identify sample size (n=18), sample mean (x-hat=79.2), and standard deviation (s=41.1).
2. Calculate the standard error: SE = s / √n = 41.1 / √18 ≈ 9.67.
3. Determine the t-score for a 90% confidence interval with 17 degrees of freedom (df=n-1): t = 1.740.
4. Calculate the margin of error: ME = t × SE ≈ 1.740 × 9.67 ≈ 16.82.
5. Construct the confidence interval: x-hat ± ME = 79.2 ± 16.82 ≈ (66.58, 91.82).

To know more about confidence interval click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29680703#

#SPJ11

The area bounded by the circle =2 and the rays =5, and = is 4π/3 square units.

To compute the area bounded by the circle =2 and the rays =5, and = as an integral in polar coordinates, we can use the formula:

A = (1/2)∫[b,a] r² dθ

where r is the polar radius, and a and b are the angles where the rays intersect the circle.

Since the circle has a radius of 2, we have r = 2 for the equation of the circle. We also know that the rays intersect the circle at angles π/3 and 5π/3 (or 2π/3 and 4π/3 in the standard position).

Therefore, we have:

A = (1/2)∫[2π/3,4π/3] (2)² dθ
A = 2∫[2π/3,4π/3] dθ
A = 2(4π/3 - 2π/3)
A = 2(2π/3)
A = 4π/3

So, the area bounded by the circle =2 and the rays =5, and = is 4π/3 square units.

To learn more about area here:

brainly.com/question/26315835#

#SPJ11

Answer:

The IQR of 13 is the most accurate to use, since the data is skewed. The reason for this is that the data is not evenly distributed, as shown by the histogram with a large number of donations in the higher range. The IQR is a measure of variability that is less sensitive to outliers and skewed data than the range, which makes it a better choice for this type of data. Additionally, the IQR can provide information on the spread of the middle 50% of the data, which can be useful in understanding the typical donation range for the charity.

Verifying the numbers states that a. Icm(60, 90).gcd(60, 90) = mn is right. The correct answer is option a)

To verify Icm(m,n).gcd(m, n) = mn, we need to calculate the least common multiple (Icm) and greatest common divisor (gcd) of each pair of numbers and then multiply them together to check if the product is equal to the product of the original numbers.

a. m = 60, n = 90

Icm(60, 90) = 180

gcd(60, 90) = 30

Icm(60, 90).gcd(60, 90) = 180 * 30 = 5400

m*n = 60 * 90 = 5400

Therefore, Icm(60, 90).gcd(60, 90) = mn is true.

b. m = 220, n = 1400

Icm(220, 1400) = 2200

gcd(220, 1400) = 20

Icm(220, 1400).gcd(220, 1400) = 2200 * 20 = 44000

m*n = 220 * 1400 = 308000

Therefore, Icm(220, 1400).gcd(220, 1400) ≠ mn is false.

c. m = 32.73.11, n = 23.5.7

Icm(32.73.11, 23.5.7) = 32.73.11.5.7 = 12789

gcd(32.73.11, 23.5.7) = 1

Icm(32.73.11, 23.5.7).gcd(32.73.11, 23.5.7) = 12789 * 1 = 12789

m*n = 32.73.11 * 23.5.7 = 2539623

Therefore, Icm(32.73.11, 23.5.7).gcd(32.73.11, 23.5.7) ≠ mn is false.

Therefore, the only true statement is option a. Icm(60, 90).gcd(60, 90) = mn.

Know more about least common multiple (Icm) here:

https://brainly.com/question/29156201

#SPJ11

To know about the relationship between a low alpha level (a) and the power of a statistical test. If you choose a very low alpha level, close to zero, then the correct option is:

b. the test will have very low power.

When you set a very low alpha level, it means that you are being very strict about rejecting the null hypothesis, so you will need very strong evidence to do so. As a result, the chances of committing a Type II error (failing to reject a false null hypothesis) increases, which in turn decreases the power of the test. The power of a test is the probability of correctly rejecting the null hypothesis when it is indeed false.

To explain further, power is influenced by several factors, including sample size, effect size, and alpha level. A low alpha level means that the critical region is smaller, and the probability of rejecting a true null hypothesis is reduced. This, in turn, leads to a higher probability of failing to reject a false null hypothesis, resulting in low power. In contrast, a higher alpha level will increase the power of the test, but it also increases the likelihood of committing a Type I error (rejecting a true null hypothesis). Therefore, choosing the appropriate alpha level for a test is crucial to achieving the desired balance between type I and type II error rates and maximizing the power of the test.

Learn more about the statistical test :

https://brainly.com/question/13376462

#SPJ11

To know about the relationship between a low alpha level (a) and the power of a statistical test. If you choose a very low alpha level, close to zero, then the correct option is:

b. the test will have very low power.

When you set a very low alpha level, it means that you are being very strict about rejecting the null hypothesis, so you will need very strong evidence to do so. As a result, the chances of committing a Type II error (failing to reject a false null hypothesis) increases, which in turn decreases the power of the test. The power of a test is the probability of correctly rejecting the null hypothesis when it is indeed false.

To explain further, power is influenced by several factors, including sample size, effect size, and alpha level. A low alpha level means that the critical region is smaller, and the probability of rejecting a true null hypothesis is reduced. This, in turn, leads to a higher probability of failing to reject a false null hypothesis, resulting in low power. In contrast, a higher alpha level will increase the power of the test, but it also increases the likelihood of committing a Type I error (rejecting a true null hypothesis). Therefore, choosing the appropriate alpha level for a test is crucial to achieving the desired balance between type I and type II error rates and maximizing the power of the test.

Learn more about the statistical test :

https://brainly.com/question/13376462

#SPJ11

True. The p-value is the smallest level of significance at which the null hypothesis can be rejected. The given statement is true.

The p-value is the probability of obtaining a test statistic as extreme or more extreme than the observed value, assuming the null hypothesis is true. If the p-value is smaller than the chosen level of significance (usually 0.05), then we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis.

When comparing the p-value to a predetermined significance level (alpha), if the p-value is less than or equal to alpha, the null hypothesis is rejected, indicating that there is a significant effect or relationship. If the p-value is greater than alpha, the null hypothesis is not rejected, suggesting that there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, the p-value represents the smallest level of significance at which we can reject the null hypothesis.

Know more about p-value here:

https://brainly.com/question/13786078

#SPJ11

Derivative of z, dz/dt = (∂z/∂x)(dx/dt) + (∂z/∂y)(dy/dt) = (3/2)(-2) + (0)(-3) = -3

We need to use the chain rule:

dz/dt = (∂z/∂x)(dx/dt) + (∂z/∂y)(dy/dt)

We can find ∂z/∂x and ∂z/∂y by differentiating the given equation with respect to x and y, respectively:

2z(dz/dx) = 3x² + 2y(dy/dx)

2z(dz/dy) = 2y

Solving for dz/dx and dz/dy, we get:

dz/dx = (3x² + 2y(dy/dx))/(2z)

dz/dy = y/z

Plugging in the given values, we get:

dz/dx = (3(4)²)/(2(2sqrt(4³))) + 0 = 3/2

dz/dy = 0/sqrt(4³) = 0

So, dz/dt = (∂z/∂x)(dx/dt) + (∂z/∂y)(dy/dt) = (3/2)(-2) + (0)(-3) = -3

Learn more about Derivative.

brainly.com/question/30365299

#SPJ11

Derivative of z, dz/dt = (∂z/∂x)(dx/dt) + (∂z/∂y)(dy/dt) = (3/2)(-2) + (0)(-3) = -3

We need to use the chain rule:

dz/dt = (∂z/∂x)(dx/dt) + (∂z/∂y)(dy/dt)

We can find ∂z/∂x and ∂z/∂y by differentiating the given equation with respect to x and y, respectively:

2z(dz/dx) = 3x² + 2y(dy/dx)

2z(dz/dy) = 2y

Solving for dz/dx and dz/dy, we get:

dz/dx = (3x² + 2y(dy/dx))/(2z)

dz/dy = y/z

Plugging in the given values, we get:

dz/dx = (3(4)²)/(2(2sqrt(4³))) + 0 = 3/2

dz/dy = 0/sqrt(4³) = 0

So, dz/dt = (∂z/∂x)(dx/dt) + (∂z/∂y)(dy/dt) = (3/2)(-2) + (0)(-3) = -3

Learn more about Derivative.

brainly.com/question/30365299

#SPJ11

Answer:

1.5

Step-by-step explanation:

12(1.5) + 17 = 35

The transformation that will map quadrilateral PQRS onto itself is (E) Reflection over the y-axis.

Given that we have

The graph of the quadrilateral PQRS

From the graph, we can see that

The quadrilateral PQRS mirrors itself over the y-axis

This means that a reflectionn across the y-axis would map the quadrilateral PQRS onto itself.

Hence, the transformation that will map quadrilateral PQRS onto itself is (E) Reflection over the y-axis.

Read more about transformation at

https://brainly.com/question/4289712

#SPJ1

Finally, to get the sample standard deviation, we take the square root of the sample variance: [tex]s \sqrt(49.27) \approx 7.02[/tex] (rounded to two decimal places)Thus, option D is correct.

To calculate the point estimate of the population standard deviation, we can use the sample standard deviation formula. The sample standard deviation (denoted as s) is given by:

[tex]s = \sqrt(Σ(x - xx_1)^2 / (n - 1))[/tex]

where:

x = individual data points in the sample

[tex]x_1 =[/tex]mean of the sample

n = number of data points in the sample

Given the data points in the simple random sample:  [tex]9, 13, 15, 15, 21, 24[/tex]

First, we need to calculate the sample mean (x):

 [tex]x = (9 + 13 + 15 + 15 + 21 + 24) / 6 = 97 / 6 \approx 16.17[/tex](rounded to two decimal places)

Next, we can plug the sample mean (x) into the formula and calculate the sum of squared differences:

[tex]Σ(x - xx_1)^2 = (9 - 16.17)^2 + (13 - 16.17)^2 + (15 - 16.17)^2 + (15 - 16.17)^2 + (21 - 16.17)^2 + (24 - 16.17)^2 \approx 246.33[/tex] (rounded to two decimal places)

Then, we divide the sum of squared differences by (n - 1) to get the sample variance:

[tex]s^2 = Σ(x - xx)^2 / (n - 1) = 246.33 / 5 \approx 49.27[/tex] (rounded to two decimal places)

Finally, to get the sample standard deviation, we take the square root of the sample variance:

[tex]s \approx \sqrt(49.27) ≈ 7.02[/tex]   (rounded to two decimal places)

Therefore, Finally, to get the sample standard deviation, we take the square root of the sample variance: [tex]s \sqrt(49.27) \approx 7.02[/tex] (rounded to two decimal places)

Learn more about deviation here:

https://brainly.com/question/23907081

#SPJ1

The answer of the given question based on the standard deviation is the point estimate of the population standard deviation is approximately 7.688. The answer choice is A.

Standard deviation is a measure of the variability or dispersion of a set of data points. It tells us how much the data deviates from the mean or average value. The standard deviation is calculated by taking the square root of the variance. The variance is calculated by taking the sum of the squared differences between each data point and the mean, and dividing by the total number of data points.

To estimate the population standard deviation from a sample, we can use the formula:

s = √[Σ(x i - ₓ⁻)² / (n - 1)]

where s is the sample standard deviation, Σ(x i - ₓ⁻)² is the sum of the squared differences between each sample value and the sample mean, n is the sample size, and ₓ⁻ is the sample mean.

Using the given data, we have:

ₓ⁻ = (9 + 13 + 15 + 15 + 21 + 24) / 6 = 15.5

Σ(x i - ₓ⁻)² = (9 - 15.5)² + (13 - 15.5)² + (15 - 15.5)² + (15 - 15.5)² + (21 - 15.5)² + (24 - 15.5)² = 611

n = 6

Substituting the values into formula, we will get:

s = √[Σ(x i - ₓ⁻)² / (n - 1)] = √[611 / 5] ≈ 7.688

Therefore, the point estimate of the population standard deviation is approximately 7.688. The answer choice is A.

To know more about Dispersion  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30563701

#SPJ1

Answer: Right

Step-by-step explanation:

I believed I explained it to u in the other question.

Enjoy! :)

Answer:

  B)  Acute

Step-by-step explanation:

You want to classify a triangle with side lengths 21 km, 25 km, and 29 km.

A "form factor" for the triangle can be calculated from its side lengths as ...

  f = a² +b² -c² . . . . . where c is the longest side

Here, that value is ...

  f = 21² +25² -29² = 225

The interpretation is as follows:

The given triangle is an acute triangle.

__

Additional comment

This comes from the Law of Cosines. The largest angle in the triangle is ...

  arccos(f/(2ab)) = arccos(225/(2·21·25)) = arccos(3/14) ≈ 77.6°

The signs of 'a' and 'b' are positive, so the sign of the cosine matches the sign of 'f'. This makes 'f' a handy classifier of triangles.

Based on the list of options, the like terms in the box are: -2x and 21x

An expression can be simplified by combining like terms.

Like terms are those that have the same variable and exponent, so they can be combined by adding or subtracting their coefficients.

In the list of options, there are terms that have the variable x:

Of these, the terms 21x and -2x are like terms because they have the same variable x, but with different coefficients. Therefore, we can combine them by adding their coefficients:

21x - 2x = 19x

Similarly, there are two terms that do not have the variable x: 3x^2 and -14.

These are not like terms because they do not have the same variable or exponent.

Therefore, we cannot combine them further.

Therefore, the like terms in the given expression are -2x and 21x, and they can be combined to get 19x.

Read more about expression at

https://brainly.com/question/15775046

#SPJ1

The marginal cost in month nine is also $35.

The derivative of the cost function in relation to time indicates the additional cost of using the network for an additional unit of time, which is referred to as the marginal cost.

The cost function C(x) = 50 + 35x gives the total cost C for using the telephone network for x months

Taking the derivative of C(x) with respect to x, we get:

C'(x) = 35

This indicates that regardless of the number of months, the marginal cost remains constant at 35. To put it another way, no matter how many months have passed, using the network for an additional month always costs $35.

Therefore, the marginal cost in month nine is also $35.

know more about marginal cost visit :

https://brainly.com/question/7781429

#SPJ1

The complement rule states that the probability of an event occurring is equal to one minus the probability of the event not occurring. The probability of at least one individual having myopia is 1 - (1-p)^3.

To calculate the probability that at least one out of three randomly selected individuals suffers from myopia, we can use the complement rule. The complement rule states that the probability of an event occurring is equal to one minus the probability of the event not occurring.
So, let's first find the probability that none of the three individuals suffer from myopia. Assuming that the probability of an individual having myopia is p, the probability that one individual does not have myopia is (1-p). Therefore, the probability that all three individuals do not have myopia is (1-p)^3.
Now, we can use the complement rule to find the probability that at least one individual has myopia. The complement of none of the three individuals having myopia is at least one individual having myopia. So, the probability of at least one individual having myopia is 1 - (1-p)^3.
Therefore, the probability that at least one out of three randomly selected individuals suffers from myopia is 1 - (1-p)^3.
To determine the probability that at least one person out of three randomly selected individuals suffers from myopia, we can use the complementary probability method. First, we need to know the probability of an individual not having myopia (P(not myopia)). Assuming P(myopia) is the probability of having myopia, we can calculate P(not myopia) as 1 - P(myopia).
Next, we find the probability that all three individuals do not have myopia, which is the product of their individual probabilities: P(all not myopia) = P(not myopia) * P(not myopia) * P(not myopia).
Finally, we calculate the complementary probability, which is the probability that at least one person has myopia: P(at least one myopia) = 1 - P(all not myopia).
Remember to use the actual probability of myopia (P(myopia)) in the calculations to find the correct answer.

To learn more about probability, click here:

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The Laplace transforms of the given functions are:

(a) F(s) = [tex](-2.1/s) e^{(-st)} + C[/tex]

(b) F(s) = [tex]2/(s e^s)[/tex]

(c) F(s) = [tex]5 e^{(-2s)} / s - 2 / s[/tex]

(d) F(s) = [tex]3 e^{(-bs)} / s[/tex]

The Laplace transform of a function f(t) is defined as F(s) = ∫ [tex]e^{(-st)[/tex] f(t) dt, where s is a complex number. We will use this formula to find the Laplace transform of each of the given functions:

(a) 2.1u(t)

u(t) is the unit step function, which is 0 for t < 0 and 1 for t ≥ 0. Therefore, 2.1u(t) is 0 for t < 0 and 2.1 for t ≥ 0. Using the formula for the Laplace transform, we get:

F(s) = ∫ [tex]e^{(-st)[/tex] 2.1u(t) dt

= ∫ [tex]e^{(-st)[/tex] 2.1 dt (since u(t) = 1 for t ≥ 0)

= 2.1 ∫ [tex]e^{(-st)[/tex] dt

= [tex]2.1 (-1/s) e^{(-st)} + C[/tex] (using the formula ∫ [tex]e^{(-st)} dt = -1/s e^{(-st)} + C)[/tex]

= [tex](-2.1/s) e^{(-st)} + C[/tex]

(b) 2u(t − 1)

u(t − 1) is the unit step function shifted by 1 unit to the right. Therefore, u(t − 1) is 0 for t < 1 and 1 for t ≥ 1. Therefore, 2u(t − 1) is 0 for t < 1 and 2 for t ≥ 1. Using the formula for the Laplace transform, we get:

F(s) = ∫ [tex]e^{(-st)[/tex] 2u(t - 1) dt

= ∫ [tex]e^{(-s(t-1))} 2u(t - 1) d(t-1)[/tex] (using the substitution t' = t-1)

= ∫ [tex]e^{(-s(t-1))} 2 d(t-1)[/tex] (since u(t - 1) = 1 for t ≥ 1)

= 2 ∫ [tex]e^{(-s(t-1))} d(t-1)[/tex]

= [tex]2 e^{(-s(t-1))} / -s[/tex] | from 1 to infinity

= [tex]2/(s e^s)[/tex]

(c) 5u(t − 2) − 2u(t)

Using linearity, we can find the Laplace transform of each term separately and then subtract them:

F(s) = L{5u(t − 2)} - L{2u(t)}

= 5 L{u(t − 2)} - 2 L{u(t)}

= [tex]5 e^{(-2s)} / s - 2 / s[/tex]

(d) 3u(t − b), where b > 0

Using a similar approach as in (b) and (c), we get:

F(s) = 3 L{u(t − b)}

= [tex]3 e^{(-bs)} / s[/tex]

To know more about Laplace transforms, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/29803180#

#SPJ11

(a) [tex]$\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x}[/tex][tex]-[/tex][tex]\frac{\partial P}{\partial y} = 0$[/tex], and the line integral of [tex]$F.dr$[/tex] around any closed curve is zero.

(b) [tex]$\oint_C F.dr = ab\int_{0}^{2\pi} (\cos^2 t - \sin^2 t)e^{b\sin t} dt$[/tex]cannot evaluate the line integral of F.dr around the given closed curve using Green

(a) We want to use Green's theorem to evaluate the line integral of F.dr around the circle [tex]$x^2 + y^2 = a^2$.[/tex]

Green's theorem states that:

[tex]$\oint_C F.dr = \iint_R (\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial P}{\partial y}) dA$[/tex]

where [tex]$F = P\hat{i} + Q\hat{j}$[/tex] is a vector field,[tex]$C$[/tex] is a closed curve in the plane, and [tex]$R$[/tex] is the region bounded by[tex]$C$[/tex].

In this case, we have:

[tex]$F = y\hat{i} - x\hat{j}$[/tex]

[tex]$P = 0$[/tex]and[tex]$Q = y$[/tex]

[tex]$\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x}[/tex] = 0 and [tex]$\frac{\partial P}{\partial y} = 0$[/tex]

Therefore, [tex]$\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x}[/tex][tex]-[/tex][tex]\frac{\partial P}{\partial y} = 0$[/tex], and the line integral of [tex]$F.dr$[/tex] around any closed curve is zero.

(b) We want to use Green's theorem to evaluate the line integral of[tex]$F.dr$[/tex]around the closed curve C defined by[tex]$x = a\cos t$, $y = b\sin t$, $0 \leq t \leq 2\pi$.[/tex]

Green's theorem states that:

[tex]$\oint_C F.dr = \iint_R (\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial P}{\partial y}) dA$[/tex]

where [tex]$F = P\hat{i} + Q\hat{j}$[/tex] is a vector field, C is a closed curve in the plane, and R is the region bounded by C.

In this case, we have:

[tex]$F = xe^{y}\hat{i} + (ye^{y} + e^{y})\hat{j}$[/tex]

[tex]$P = xe^{y}$[/tex]and [tex]$Q = ye^{y} + e^{y}$[/tex]

[tex]$\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x}[/tex]= 0 and [tex]$\frac{\partial P}{\partial y} = xe^{y} + e^{y}$[/tex]

Therefore,

[tex]$\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial P}{\partial y} = -xe^{y}$[/tex]

The region R enclosed by C is an ellipse with semi-axes a and b, and its area is given by[tex]$A = \pi ab$[/tex]. Using polar coordinates, we have:

[tex]$x = a\cos t$[/tex]

[tex]$y = b\sin t$[/tex]

[tex]$\frac{\partial x}{\partial t} = -a\sin t$[/tex]

[tex]$\frac{\partial y}{\partial t} = b\cos t$[/tex]

[tex]$dA = \frac{\partial x}{\partial t} \frac{\partial y}{\partial t} dt = -ab\sin t \cos t dt$[/tex]

Thus, we have:

[tex]$\oint_C F.dr = \iint_R (\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial P}{\partial y}) dA = \int_{0}^{2\pi} \int_{0}^{ab} (-xe^{y}) (-ab\sin t \cos t) drdt$[/tex]

[tex]$= ab\int_{0}^{2\pi} (\cos^2 t - \sin^2 t)e^{b\sin t} dt$[/tex]

This integral does not have a closed-form solution, so we need to use numerical methods to approximate its value.

Therefore, we cannot evaluate the line integral of F.dr around the given closed curve using Green

Learn more about Green's theorem

brainly.com/question/27549150

#SPJ11

Answer:

  7√2 ≈ 9.9 dm

Step-by-step explanation:

You want the radius of a circle when tangents from a point 14 dm from the center make a right angle.

The attached figure shows all of the angles between radii and tangents are right angles. Effectively, the tangents and radii make a square whose side length is the radius of the circle. The diagonal of the square is given as 14 dm. We know this is √2 times the side length, so the length of the radius is ...

  r = (14 dm)/√2 = 7√2 dm ≈ 9.8995 dm ≈ 9.90 dm

The radius is about 9.90 dm.

__

Additional comment

The angles at A and O are supplementary, so both are 90°. The angles at the points of tangency are 90°, so the figure is at least a rectangle. Since adjacent sides (the radii, the tangents) are congruent, the rectangle must be a square. The given length is the diagonal of that square.

For side lengths s, the Pythagorean theorem tells you the diagonal length d satisfies ...

  d² = s² +s² = 2s²

  d = s√2

  d/√2 = s . . . . . . . . the relation we used above

This relationship between the sides and diagonal of a square is used a lot, so is worthwhile to remember.

The required sample size for formula 1 is at least 26 and for formula 2 is at least 36 to estimate the difference in mean road octane number with a margin of error less than 1 and 95% confidence, assuming normality.

To find the required sample size for each population, we need to calculate the standard error of the difference in means and use it to set up a confidence interval with a margin of error less than 1.

The formula for the standard error of the difference in means is:

SE = √( σ₁²/n₁ + σ₂²/n₂ )

Substituting the given values, we get

SE = √( 1.5/15 + 1.2/20 )

SE = 0.290

To achieve a margin of error less than 1 with 95% confidence, we need to find the sample size that satisfies the following inequality:

t(0.025, df) × SE < 1

where t(0.025, df) is the critical value of the t-distribution with degrees of freedom df = n₁ + n₂ - 2 at the 0.025 level of significance.

Solving for n₁ and n₂ simultaneously, we get:

n₁ = ( t(0.025, df) × SE / (x₁ - x₂ + 1) )² × ( σ₁² + σ₂² ) / σ₁²

n₂ = ( t(0.025, df) × SE / (x₁ - x₂ + 1) )² × ( σ₁² + σ₂² ) / σ₂²

where x₁ - x₂ + 1 is the margin of error.

Looking up the t-value for df = n₁ + n₂ - 2 = 33 and α/2 = 0.025, we get t(0.025, 33) = 2.032.

Substituting the given values, we get

n₁ = ( 2.032 × 0.290 / (88.6 - 93.4 + 1) )² × ( 1.5 + 1.2 ) / 1.5 ≈ 26

n₂ = ( 2.032 × 0.290 / (88.6 - 93.4 + 1) )² × ( 1.5 + 1.2 ) / 1.2 ≈ 36

Learn more about standard error here

brainly.com/question/30667112

#SPJ4

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:

Two different formulas of an oxygenated motor fuel are being tested to study their road octane numbers. The variance of road octane number for formula 1 is σ₁² = 1.5, and for formula 2 it is. σ₂² = 1.2. Two random samples of size n₁ = 15 and n₂ = 20 are tested, and the mean octane numbers observed are x₁= 88.6 fluid ounces and x₂ = 93.4. fluid ounces. Assume normality . what sample size would be required in each population if you wanted to be 95onfident that the error in estimating the difference in mean road octane number is less than 1?

Left-hand side = 61/10.

Right-hand side = 51/10.

The left-hand side is not equal to the right-hand side, we can see that the associative property of addition does not hold for the given rational numbers.

What are rational exponents?

Rational exponents are exponents that are expressed as fractions.

To verify the associative property of addition for the given rational numbers, we need to check if:

(7/2 + (4/2)) + (3/5) = 7/2 + ((4/2) + (3/5))

First, let's simplify each side of the equation:

Left-hand side:

(7/2 + (4/2)) + (3/5)

= (11/2) + (3/5)

= (55/10) + (6/10)

= 61/10.

Right-hand side:

7/2 + ((4/2) + (3/5))

= 7/2 + (8/5)

= (35/10) + (16/10)

= 51/10.

Since the left-hand side is not equal to the right-hand side, we can see that the associative property of addition does not hold for the given rational numbers.

To learn more about rationlal exponents from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/3009444

#SPJ1

The correct interpretation of the confidence interval concerning the study is that the researchers expect that 98% of all similarly constructed intervals will contain the true mean number of oocytes that could be retrieved from the population of women aged 36-40 years.

The reported interval of (8.1, 11.3) represents the range of values that is likely to contain the true mean number of oocytes retrieved from the population of women aged 36-40 years, with 98% confidence. This means that if the study were repeated multiple times with different random samples of women aged 36-40 years, and if the same statistical methods were used, then 98% of the resulting confidence intervals would contain the true population means.

It is important to note that this confidence interval applies only to the population of women aged 36-40 years, and not to other populations or age groups. Additionally, the confidence interval does not guarantee that the true population means falls within the reported interval with 98% probability, but rather that 98% of intervals constructed from repeated sampling will contain the true population means.

To learn more about confidence interval, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17034620

#SPJ11

Answer: x<9

Step-by-step explanation:3x<27Divide both sides by 3. Since 3 is positive, the inequality direction remains the same.x<327​Divide 27 by 3 to get 9.x<9

Answer:

x<9

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a) After one month, the value of the shares increased by:

£7000 x 12/100 = £840

Therefore, the shares were worth:

£7000 + £840 = £7840

b) After two months, the value of the shares decreased by:

£7840 x 15/100 = £1176

Therefore, the shares were worth:

£7840 - £1176 = £6664

1. The 95% confidence interval is between 567.07 and 739.93 vehicles per hour
2. The 98% confidence interval is between 547.47 and 759.53 vehicles per hour
3. The sample size needed for a 95% confidence interval to specify the mean to within ±55 vehicles per hour is 121
4. The sample size needed for a 98% confidence interval to specify the mean to within ±55 vehicles per hour is 187

1. To find the 95% confidence interval, we use the formula:

Mean improvement +/- (t-value * standard error)

where t-value for 49 degrees of freedom at 95% confidence level is 2.009.

The standard error can be found by dividing the standard deviation by the square root of the sample size:

Standard error = 311.7 / sqrt(50) = 44.06

So the 95% confidence interval is:

653.5 +/- (2.009 * 44.06) = (567.07, 739.93)

Therefore, we can say with 95% confidence that the true mean improvement in traffic flow is between 567.07 and 739.93 vehicles per hour.

2. To find the 98% confidence interval, we use the same formula but with a different t-value. For 49 degrees of freedom at 98% confidence level, the t-value is 2.678.

The 98% confidence interval is:

653.5 +/- (2.678 * 44.06) = (547.47, 759.53)

Therefore, we can say with 98% confidence that the true mean improvement in traffic flow is between 547.47 and 759.53 vehicles per hour.

3. To find the sample size needed for a 95% confidence interval to specify the mean to within ±55 vehicles per hour, we use the formula:

n = [tex](z * s / E)^2[/tex]

where z is the z-value for 95% confidence level (1.96), s is the standard deviation (311.7), and E is the margin of error (55).

Plugging in the values, we get:

n = [tex](1.96 * 311.7 / 55)^2[/tex] = 120.25

Rounding up, we need a sample size of 121 to achieve a 95% confidence interval with a margin of error of ±55 vehicles per hour.

4. To find the sample size needed for a 98% confidence interval to specify the mean to within ±55 vehicles per hour, we use the same formula but with a different z-value. For 98% confidence level, the z-value is 2.33.

Plugging in the values, we get:

n = [tex](2.33 * 311.7 / 55)^2[/tex] = 186.34

Rounding up, we need a sample size of 187 to achieve a 98% confidence interval with a margin of error of ±55 vehicles per hour.

Know more about Standard deviation here :

https://brainly.com/question/475676

#SPJ11

From the system of equations, the price of one pair of pants is 72

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

This means that we have

2x + 3y = 138

3x + 6y = 204

When this is solved graphically, we have

x = 72 and y = -2

Hence, the solution is (72, -2)

Read more about system of equations

https://brainly.com/question/13729904

#SPJ1