Consider ten (10) ethylene molecules undergoes
polymerization to form the
polythene. What is the molecular mass of the resultant polymer

Hence the elements are (a) chlorine (Cl). (b) Carbon (C). (c) Metalloids. (d) helium (He).

a) The element with atoms having seven outermost electrons and being in the third period is chlorine (Cl). Chlorine has 17 electrons, 2 of which are in the inner shell and 7 in the outermost shell. As you move across the periodic table, the number of valence electrons increases by one, making Cl the seventh element in its period.

b) The most variable element in its properties is carbon (C). Carbon is a nonmetal and has the unique property of being able to form long chains with itself and other elements like hydrogen and oxygen. It is the basis for all life on Earth and has various allotropes, including graphite, diamond, and fullerene.

c) The element that sometimes acts as a metal and other times as a nonmetal is metalloids. Metalloids are elements that have properties of both metals and nonmetals. They are found along the zigzag line on the periodic table and include elements like silicon, boron, and arsenic.

d) The noble gas that is in the second period and has the fewest protons is helium (He). Helium is the second-lightest element and has two protons. It is the only element that cannot form chemical bonds due to having a full outer shell of electrons. As a result, it is chemically inert and does not react with other elements easily.

To know more about elements visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30858299

#SPJ11

The universal gas constant, R, has different values and units in cgs units depending on the class of problems. For mass-related problems, R has a value of 8.31 × 10^7 erg/(mol·K). For heat-related problems, R has a value of 1.987 cal/(mol·K) or 8.314 J/(mol·K).

(i) For mass-related problems, such as changes in pressure, volume, or number of moles, the universal gas constant, R, in cgs units has a value of 8.31 × 10^7 erg/(mol·K). The cgs unit system uses the erg as the unit of energy, and the mole (mol) as the unit of the amount of substance. The Kelvin (K) is used for temperature. This value of R allows for the calculation of changes in pressure, volume, or number of moles in these types of problems in the cgs unit system.

(ii) For heat-related problems, where the amount of heat required to heat up a given mass or volume is considered, the universal gas constant, R, in cgs units has a value of 1.987 cal/(mol·K) or 8.314 J/(mol·K). In this context, the cal (calorie) or the J (joule) is used as the unit of energy, the mol represents the amount of substance, and K stands for Kelvin. This value of R enables the calculation of the amount of heat required in caloric or joule units for heating processes involving a given mass or volume in the cgs unit system.

Learn more about pressure: brainly.com/question/30673967

#SPJ11

i) Estimate the entropy of vaporisation, AvapSm, of ethanoic acid at 391 K:

We can use the Clausius-Clapeyron equation to calculate the entropy of vaporization.

ΔHvap/T = ΔSvap/R

Here, R is the gas constant=8.31 J/K/mol.

The enthalpy of vaporization (ΔHvap) of ethanoic acid is 23.7 kJ/mol, and the temperature is 391 K.

ΔSvap = ΔHvap / T ΔSvap = 23.7 × 1000/ (391) ΔSvap = 60.7 J/K/mol

ii) Estimate the vapour pressure of ethanoic acid at 350 K, listing any assumptions that you make.To solve this problem, we'll need to use the Clausius-Clapeyron equation.

P₁/T₁ = P₂/T₂

Here, P₁ is the vapor pressure of ethanoic acid at 391 K, which is 1 bar. T₁ is the temperature of 391 K. P₂ is the vapor pressure of ethanoic acid at 350 K, which we are asked to find.

T₂ is the temperature of 350 K.Using the equation, we can find P₂.

1/391 K = P₂/350 K

So,P₂ = (1 × 350)/391

P₂ = 0.894 bar

So, the vapor pressure of ethanoic acid at 350 K is 0.894 bar.

iii) Estimate the change in molar Helmholtz energy Am when ethanoic acid is vaporized at 391 K and 1 bar.The Helmholtz free energy change is given by the equation: ΔG = ΔH - TΔS

At constant temperature and pressure, ΔG = ΔH - TΔS

For the vaporization of ethanoic acid, ΔHvap is 23.7 kJ/mol, and ΔSvap is 60.7 J/K/mol.

So, ΔG = (23.7 × 1000) - (391 × 60.7) ΔG = -5438.7 J/mol.The change in molar Helmholtz energy is -5438.7 J/mol.

Learn about helmholtz energy : https://brainly.com/question/27686274

#SPJ11

A practical reflux ratio for the given system with 50 wt% A in the feed, 95 wt% A in the tops, and 5 wt% A in the bottoms would be around 2.0. This choice of reflux ratio allows for effective separation of the components A and B during distillation.

The reflux ratio in distillation refers to the ratio of the liquid returning as reflux to the amount of liquid being withdrawn as distillate. By increasing the reflux ratio, more of the condensed vapor is returned to the distillation column, leading to improved separation efficiency.

In this case, since A is more volatile than B with a relative volatility of 2.0, it means that A has a higher tendency to vaporize. By choosing a reflux ratio of 2.0, it ensures that a sufficient amount of liquid rich in A is returned to the column, promoting better separation and allowing for a higher concentration of A in the distillate (tops) and a lower concentration of A in the bottoms.

Therefore, a practical reflux ratio of 2.0 is suggested to achieve effective separation of components A and B in the distillation of the binary mixture.

know more about distillation :brainly.com/question/31829945

#SPJ11

ALARP and SFAIRP are legislative concepts defined in various jurisdictions. They signify risk management principles that prioritize practicality and flexibility over rigid prescription.

ALARP (As Low as Reasonably Practicable) and SFAIRP (So Far as is Reasonably Practicable) are risk management concepts defined in various legislative frameworks.

ALARP emphasizes reducing risks to a level that is reasonably achievable, considering the balance between the effort, time, and money required and the potential benefits gained. SFAIRP, on the other hand, focuses on taking measures that are reasonably practicable in the circumstances to manage risks.

These concepts offer several advantages over prescriptive regulations. Firstly, they allow flexibility in risk management, enabling organizations to tailor their approach based on specific circumstances and resources.

Secondly, they promote a practical and realistic assessment of risks, avoiding excessive burden and unrealistic expectations. This encourages a pragmatic and balanced approach to risk management that considers both the severity of the risk and the feasibility of control measures.

Learn more about Flexibility here: brainly.com/question/30197720

#SPJ11

The presence of irregular phases in the microstructure of the steel during quality control indicates potential quality issues or deviations from the desired material properties. Thorough cleaning and confirmation are necessary steps to further investigate and address the problem.

To address irregular phases in the microstructure of the steel, several steps can be taken. Thorough cleaning is important to ensure that any surface contaminants or impurities are removed, allowing for a clearer examination of the microstructure.

Confirmation of the irregular phases can be done through various techniques, such as optical microscopy, electron microscopy, or X-ray diffraction. These techniques provide detailed information about the composition, crystal structure, and morphology of the phases present in the steel.

Upon confirmation, further analysis can be conducted to determine the cause of the irregular phases. Factors such as improper heat treatment, alloy composition deviations, or processing issues during manufacturing can contribute to such microstructural abnormalities.

The presence of irregular phases in the microstructure of the steel during quality control indicates a potential quality issue in the plates used for ship hull production. Thorough cleaning and confirmation through appropriate analytical techniques are essential steps in identifying and understanding the irregular phases Addressing these issues is crucial to ensure the integrity and reliability of the steel plates used in shipbuilding applications.

To know more about potential visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28300184

#SPJ11

The mole fraction of C6H6 in the top product is 69.8% and the mole fraction of C7H8 in the top product is 30.2%.

Distillation tower is a separation technique for the purification of a liquid mixture or a solution based on the variations in the boiling point of the components of the mixture.

Let us solve the problem in the question.

The given information are as follows: Feed = 350 kg mole/h

C6H6+C7H8.40% (mole fraction) of C6H6 in the feed

The top product contains C6H6 = 97% (mole fraction)

Therefore, the bottom product contains C6H6 = 3% (mole fraction)

Operating pressure of distillation tower = 1 atm

Let x = moles of C6H6 in the top product(350)(0.4) = x + (moles of C6H6 in the bottom product) (this is because all the moles of C6H6 must be accounted for)

Thus, the moles of C6H6 in the bottom product = (350)(0.4) - x

Let y = moles of C7H8 in the top product

Therefore, the moles of C7H8 in the bottom product = (350 - x - y)

We know that the top product contains C6H6 = 97% (mole fraction)

Thus, x/(x + y) = 0.97 or x = 0.97x + 0.97y

The operating pressure of distillation tower is 1 atm and we know that the boiling point of C6H6 is lower than that of C7H8.

Hence, C6H6 will boil off first leaving behind the C7H8.

Therefore, all the moles of C6H6 will be in the top product.

Thus ,x + y = moles of C6H6 in the feed = 350(0.4) = 140

Therefore, 0.97x + 0.97y = 0.97(140) = 135.8 and

x + y = 140

Therefore, solving both equations gives the value of x and y as follows: x = 97.7y = 42.3

Hence, the top product contains 97.7 moles of C6H6 and 42.3 moles of C7H8.

Therefore, the mole fraction of C6H6 in the top product is given by x/(x + y) = 97.7/(97.7 + 42.3) = 0.698 or 69.8% (approximate to one decimal place)

Therefore, the mole fraction of C7H8 in the top product is given by y/(x + y) = 42.3/(97.7 + 42.3) = 0.302 or 30.2% (approximate to one decimal place)

Know more about mole fraction here:

https://brainly.com/question/30724931

#SPJ11

A diluted suspension of minerals with density p = 2200 kg/m³, in water with density p = 1000 kg/m³ and viscosity = 1 mN s/m², is to be separated on a plant by a centrifuge. Pilot tests have been conducted to determine the separation efficiency and the required operating parameters.

To separate the diluted suspension of minerals from water using a centrifuge, several operating parameters need to be considered. The key parameters include centrifuge speed, residence time, and the design of the centrifuge.

Centrifuge Speed:

The centrifuge speed, typically measured in revolutions per minute (rpm), determines the gravitational force acting on the suspended particles. The higher the centrifuge speed, the greater the force exerted on the particles, leading to better separation. The specific centrifuge speed required for efficient separation can be determined through pilot tests or by referencing established guidelines for similar suspensions.

Residence Time:

The residence time refers to the duration that the suspension remains in the centrifuge, which affects the separation efficiency. Longer residence times allow for more thorough separation, but they may also increase processing time and reduce plant throughput. The residence time can be optimized based on the desired separation efficiency, available centrifuge capacity, and other process requirements.

Centrifuge Design:

The design of the centrifuge is crucial for efficient separation. Different centrifuge designs, such as disk-stack, decanter, or basket centrifuges, offer varying levels of performance and are suitable for different applications. The selection of the centrifuge design depends on factors such as particle size distribution, desired separation efficiency, and the specific characteristics of the suspension.

In the case of a diluted suspension of minerals in water, a centrifuge can be used for separation. The separation efficiency and required operating parameters can be determined through pilot tests specifically conducted for the suspension of minerals. The key parameters to consider are the centrifuge speed, residence time, and the design of the centrifuge. By optimizing these parameters, the desired separation efficiency can be achieved, leading to the separation of minerals from the water in an efficient and effective manner.

Please note that the specific values for centrifuge speed, residence time, and centrifuge design are not provided in the question, as they would depend on the results of the pilot tests conducted for this particular suspension of minerals.

To  know more about density , visit;

https://brainly.com/question/29775886

#SPJ11

Q. A diluted suspension of minerals with density ρs= 2200 kg/m3 , in water with density ρ= 1000 kg/m3 , and viscosity μ= 1 mN s/m2 , is to be separated on plant using a centrifuge. Pilot tests conducted at 20000 rpm on a test machine with a throughput Q1 = 10-4 m3 /s provide a clarified overflow. The test machine has height H= 0.7 m, radius R= 0.1 m, and overflow weir, r0 = 0.03 m. - Calculate the volumetric holdup of liquid V’ in the bowl, for the test machine. - Define, and calculate the capacity factor, Σ. - Determine the cut size, d, of the separation. - Calculate the residence time for the particles to settle. Comment on your answer. - Explain the Yoshioka construction related to a continuous thickener.

The equilibrium constant (Kc) for the given reaction is approximately 0.077.

Step 1: Write the balanced chemical equation for the reaction:

N2(g) + 3H2(g) ⇌ 2NH3(g)

Step 2: Determine the initial concentrations of N2 and H2:

N2: Initial moles = 0.4811 mol

Initial concentration = 0.4811 mol / 4.50 L = 0.1069 M

H2: Initial moles = 1.721 mol

Initial concentration = 1.721 mol / 4.50 L = 0.3824 M

Step 3: Determine the equilibrium concentrations of N2 and H2:

N2: Equilibrium moles = 0.1601 mol

Equilibrium concentration = 0.1601 mol / 4.50 L = 0.0356 M

H2: Equilibrium moles = (1.721 - 3 * 0.1601) mol = 1.0807 mol

Equilibrium concentration = 1.0807 mol / 4.50 L = 0.2402 M

Step 4: Determine the equilibrium concentration of NH3:

NH3: Equilibrium moles = 2 * 0.1601 mol = 0.3202 mol

Equilibrium concentration = 0.3202 mol / 4.50 L = 0.0712 M

Step 5: Substitute the equilibrium concentrations into the equilibrium expression and calculate Kc:

Kc = ([NH3]^2) / ([N2] * [H2]^3)

= (0.0712^2) / (0.0356 * 0.2402^3)

≈ 0.077

Therefore, the equilibrium constant (Kc) for the given reaction is approximately 0.077.

Learn more about equilibrium constant  here

https://brainly.com/question/28559466

#SPJ11

The initial consumption is 3,272.103 m³/h.

Given: The capacity of an evaporator is 2,650 m³/h,

the initial concentration is 50 g/L and the

final concentration is 295 g/L.

Due to management deficiencies, there is a loss of capacity.

To find: The initial consumption.

Solution : Loss of capacity = Final capacity - Initial capacity

Let's find the final capacity: Final capacity = 2,650 m³/h

Final concentration = 295 g/L

Initial concentration = 50 g/L

So, the loss of capacity = (Final concentration - Initial concentration) x Final capacity

(295 - 50) g/L x 2,650 m³/h= 64,675 g/h = 64.675 kg/h

Now, let's find the initial capacity :

Initial capacity = Final capacity + Loss of capacity= 2,650 m³/h + (64.675 kg/h × 3600 s/h) ÷ (1000 g/kg) ÷ (295 g/L) = 2,650 m³/h + 622.103 m³/h= 3,272.103 m³/h

Know more about consumption here:

https://brainly.com/question/16301948

#SPJ11

The molar flow rates of CO and H2 in the fresh feed are approximately 95.9 gmole/min and 221.4 gmole/min, respectively. The production rate of liquid methanol is approximately 33.25 gmole/min

a. i. We have enough information to determine the molar flow rates of CO and H2 in the fresh feed. We know the molar composition of the reactor outlet stream, which contains 27.4 mol % CO and 63.1 mol % H2. Since we also know the total molar flow rate of the outlet stream (350 gmole/min), we can calculate the molar flow rates of CO and H2 by multiplying the respective mole fractions by the total flow rate.

ii. We also have enough information to determine the production rate of liquid methanol. The composition of the reactor outlet stream tells us that 9.5 mol % of the stream is CH3OH (methanol). Since we know the total molar flow rate of the outlet stream (350 gmole/min), we can calculate the production rate of liquid methanol by multiplying the total flow rate by the mole fraction of methanol.

b. To perform the calculations:

i. Molar flow rate of CO in the fresh feed = 27.4 mol% of 350 gmole/min

  = 0.274 * 350 gmole/min

  ≈ 95.9 gmole/min

  Molar flow rate of H2 in the fresh feed = 63.1 mol% of 350 gmole/min

  = 0.631 * 350 gmole/min

  ≈ 221.4 gmole/min

ii. Production rate of liquid methanol = 9.5 mol% of 350 gmole/min

  = 0.095 * 350 gmole/min

  ≈ 33.25 gmole/min

Therefore, the molar flow rates of CO and H2 in the fresh feed are approximately 95.9 gmole/min and 221.4 gmole/min, respectively. The production rate of liquid methanol is approximately 33.25 gmole/min.

Note: The single-pass and overall conversions of carbon monoxide cannot be determined without additional information, such as the molar flow rate of CO in the recycle stream or the reaction stoichiometry.a. i. We have enough information to determine the molar flow rates of CO and H2 in the fresh feed. We know the molar composition of the reactor outlet stream, which contains 27.4 mol % CO and 63.1 mol % H2. Since we also know the total molar flow rate of the outlet stream (350 gmole/min), we can calculate the molar flow rates of CO and H2 by multiplying the respective mole fractions by the total flow rate.

ii. We also have enough information to determine the production rate of liquid methanol. The composition of the reactor outlet stream tells us that 9.5 mol % of the stream is CH3OH (methanol). Since we know the total molar flow rate of the outlet stream (350 gmole/min), we can calculate the production rate of liquid methanol by multiplying the total flow rate by the mole fraction of methanol.

b. To perform the calculations:

i. Molar flow rate of CO in the fresh feed = 27.4 mol% of 350 gmole/min

  = 0.274 * 350 gmole/min

  ≈ 95.9 gmole/min

  Molar flow rate of H2 in the fresh feed = 63.1 mol% of 350 gmole/min

  = 0.631 * 350 gmole/min

  ≈ 221.4 gmole/min

ii. Production rate of liquid methanol = 9.5 mol% of 350 gmole/min

  = 0.095 * 350 gmole/min

  ≈ 33.25 gmole/min

Therefore, the molar flow rates of CO and H2 in the fresh feed are approximately 95.9 gmole/min and 221.4 gmole/min, respectively. The production rate of liquid methanol is approximately 33.25 gmole/min.

To know more about methanol, visit

https://brainly.com/question/14889608

#SPJ11

The amount of oxalic acid in the sample of rhubarb can be determined a solvent extraction process followed by analysis using a suitable analytical technique such as titration or spectrophotometry is required.

To determine the amount of oxalic acid in the rhubarb sample, a solvent extraction process can be performed. The process involves extracting the oxalic acid from the rhubarb using a suitable solvent. The extracted solution is then analyzed to measure the concentration of oxalic acid.

One common method for quantifying oxalic acid is titration. In this method, a known volume of the extracted solution is titrated with a standardized solution of a strong base, such as sodium hydroxide (NaOH). The reaction between oxalic acid and sodium hydroxide is stoichiometric, allowing the determination of the amount of oxalic acid present in the sample.

Another method is spectrophotometry, where the absorption of light by oxalic acid at a specific wavelength is measured. The absorbance is proportional to the concentration of oxalic acid, allowing its quantification.

To determine the amount of oxalic acid in the rhubarb sample, a solvent extraction process followed by analysis using a suitable analytical technique such as titration or spectrophotometry is required. These methods can provide quantitative measurements of oxalic acid concentration in the sample.

To know more about oxalic acid, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14989723

#SPJ11

Answer : The concentrations of HCl in the remaining trials are:

3rd trial: 0.875 mol/L

4th trial: 0.625 mol/L

5th trial: 1.09 mol/L

6th trial: 1.25 mol/L

From Table 2, we can see that the values of the rate of reaction are given in terms of mol/Ls and the concentrations are given in terms of mol/L, and we need to calculate the concentration of HCl. So, we can use the rate equation:

rate = k[HCl]^n and find the value of k.

Then, we can use the value of k to find the concentration of HCl in the remaining trials, which do not have a concentration value given.

The first trial already has the concentration of HCl given, so we can use that to find the value of k as follows:

Given, [HCl] = 0.5 mol/L,

rate = 1/[339.88 s] = 0.002941 mol/Ls

rate = k[HCl]^n0.002941 = k(0.5)^n

For the second trial, we have:

[HCl] = 1.0 mol/L,

rate = 1/[76.33 s] = 0.0131 mol/Ls

0.0131 = k(1.0)^n

Using the values of rate and concentration from any one trial, we can find the value of k and then use it to calculate the concentration in the other trials.

So, we can take the first trial as the reference and find the value of k:

0.002941 = k(0.5)^n

k = 0.002941/(0.5)^n

For the third trial, we have:

rate = 1/[27.85 s] = 0.0358 mol/Ls

0.0358 = k(1.5)^n

[HCl] = rate/k(1.5)^n

[HCl] = 0.0358/(0.002941/(0.5)^n)(1.5)^n[HCl] = 0.875 mol/L

For the fourth trial, we have: rate = 2.0 mol/Ls

2.0 = k(2.0)^n

[HCl] = 2.0/k(2.0)^n

[HCl] = 2.0/(0.002941/(0.5)^n)(2.0)^n

[HCl] = 0.625 mol/L

For the fifth trial, we have:

rate = 2.5 mol/Ls

2.5 = k(2.5)^n

[HCl] = 2.5/k(2.5)^n

[HCl] = 2.5/(0.002941/(0.5)^n)(2.5)^n

[HCl] = 1.09 mol/L

For the sixth trial, we have:

rate = 3.0 mol/Ls

3.0 = k(3.0)^n

[HCl] = 3.0/k(3.0)^n

[HCl] = 3.0/(0.002941/(0.5)^n)(3.0)^n

[HCl] = 1.25 mol/L

Know more about concentrations here:

https://brainly.com/question/30575626

#SPJ11

Answer:

Hot Oil will have be less viscous.

Explanation:

This is because due to the heat its molecules will be far apart from each other.

ΔS, ΔH, ΔU when 200 g of gaseous water is heated from 120 to 250 °C in an atmosphere of Pressure is given as,

ΔS = 63.44 J/K

ΔH = 29,908 J

ΔU = 29,108 J

To calculate ΔS (change in entropy), ΔH (change in enthalpy), and ΔU (change in internal energy), we can use the following formulas:

ΔS = ∫(Cp/T)dT

ΔH = ∫CpdT

ΔU = ΔH - PΔV

Given data:

Cp = 30.54 + 1.03 × 10^-2T (J/mol·K)

Mass of gaseous water (m) = 200 g

Temperature range (T1 to T2) = 120°C to 250°C

Pressure (P) = Assume ideal gas behavior

First, let's convert the mass of gaseous water to moles:

Number of moles (n) = mass / molar mass

Molar mass of H2O = 18.01528 g/mol

n = 200 g / 18.01528 g/mol ≈ 11.102 mol

Now, we can calculate ΔS by integrating Cp/T with respect to temperature from T1 to T2:

ΔS = ∫(Cp/T)dT

   = ∫[(30.54 + 1.03 × 10^-2T) / T] dT

   = 30.54 ln(T) + 1.03 × 10^-2T ln(T) + C

Evaluating the integral at T2 and subtracting the integral at T1, we get:

ΔS = (30.54 ln(T2) + 1.03 × 10^-2T2 ln(T2)) - (30.54 ln(T1) + 1.03 × 10^-2T1 ln(T1))

Substituting the given temperature values, we can calculate ΔS:

ΔS = (30.54 ln(250) + 1.03 × 10^-2 × 250 ln(250)) - (30.54 ln(120) + 1.03 × 10^-2 × 120 ln(120))

   ≈ 63.44 J/K

Next, let's calculate ΔH by integrating Cp with respect to temperature from T1 to T2:

ΔH = ∫CpdT

   = ∫(30.54 + 1.03 × 10^-2T) dT

   = 30.54T + (1.03 × 10^-2/2)T^2 + C

Evaluating the integral at T2 and subtracting the integral at T1, we get:

ΔH = (30.54 × 250 + 1.03 × 10^-2/2 × 250^2) - (30.54 × 120 + 1.03 × 10^-2/2 × 120^2)

   ≈ 29,908 J

Finally, we can calculate ΔU using the formula ΔU = ΔH - PΔV. Since the process is at constant pressure, ΔU is equal to ΔH:

ΔU = ΔH

   ≈ 29,908 J

When 200 g of gaseous water is heated from 120 to 250 °C in an atmosphere of pressure, the change in entropy (ΔS) is approximately 63.44 J/K, the change in enthalpy (ΔH) is approximately 29,908 J, and the change in

To know more about gaseous water, visit

https://brainly.com/question/24719118

#SPJ11

Answer:

The compounds differ in (2) molecular formula.

Explanation

The molecular formula represents the actual number and types of atoms present in a molecule. In the given compounds, the arrangement of atoms is different, resulting in different molecular formulas.

The first compound is an organic molecule with a central oxygen atom (O) bonded to two carbon atoms (C) and two hydrogen atoms (H) on each side. Its molecular formula is C2H6O.

The second compound is an organic molecule with a chain of four carbon atoms (C) and 10 hydrogen atoms (H). Its molecular formula is C4H10.

Therefore, the compounds differ in their molecular formulas, as the arrangement and number of atoms are distinct. The other options mentioned, such as gram-formula mass, percent composition by mass, and physical properties at STP, may vary between compounds but are not the factors that differentiate these specific compounds in this context.

a. Rate of heat loss per hour from 100 ft of the pipe: Q ≈ 628,224 Btu/h.

b. Heat flux on the inner face of the pipe: q_inner ≈ 122,897 Btu/h ft².

c. Heat flux on the external face of the pipe: q_external ≈ 92,926 Btu/h ft².

To calculate the rate of heat loss per hour from the pipe, we can use the formula:

Q = 2πkL(T1 - T2) / ln(r2 / r1)

Given data:

Inside Diameter = 3.07 in.

Outside Diameter = 3.50 in.

k = 34 Btu/h ft °F

T1 = 250°F

T2 = 100°F

L = 100 ft

First, let's calculate the inner and outer radii of the pipe:

Inner Radius (r1) = Inside Diameter / 2 = 3.07 in. / 2 = 1.535 in. = 0.1279 ft

Outer Radius (r2) = Outside Diameter / 2 = 3.50 in. / 2 = 1.75 in. = 0.1458 ft

Now, we can substitute the given values into the formula to calculate the rate of heat loss (Q):

Q = 2π × k × L × (T1 - T2) / ln(r2 / r1)

Q = 2π × 34 × 100 × (250 - 100) / ln(0.1458 / 0.1279)

Calculating the expression inside the parentheses:

Q = 2π × 34 × 100 × 150 / ln(1.137)

Using the value of ln(1.137) ≈ 0.1305:

Q ≈ 2π × 34 × 100 × 150 / 0.1305

Q ≈ 628224 Btu/h

Therefore, the rate of heat loss per hour from 100 ft of this pipe is approximately 628,224 Btu/h.

To calculate the heat flux on the inner face of the pipe, we can use the formula:

q_inner = Q / (π × r1²)

where:

q_inner is the heat flux on the inner face of the pipe.

Substituting the values:

q_inner = 628224 / (π × 0.1279²)

q_inner ≈ 122,897 Btu/h ft²

Therefore, the heat flux on the inner face of the pipe is approximately 122,897 Btu/h ft².

To calculate the heat flux on the external face of the pipe, we can use the formula:

q_external = Q / (π × r2²)

where:

q_external is the heat flux on the external face of the pipe.

Substituting the values:

q_external = 628224 / (π × 0.1458²)

q_external ≈ 92,926 Btu/h ft²

Therefore, the heat flux on the external face of the pipe is approximately 92,926 Btu/h ft².

Read more on heat flux here: https://brainly.com/question/30708042

#SPJ11

The rate constant for the dissociation reaction is 0.055 minutes⁻¹.

To determine the rate constant of the dissociation reaction in the vapor phase of Na₂ → 2Na, we can use the first-order rate equation:

Rate = k [Na₂]

Where:

Rate is the rate of reaction (expressed in moles per unit time),

k is the rate constant,

[Na₂] is the concentration of Na₂.

Given that the reaction follows an elementary rate law, the rate constant can be determined by analyzing the reduction in the amount of Na₂ over time. The problem states that the amount of Na₂ reduced to 45% in 10 minutes. This implies that the remaining amount of Na₂ after 10 minutes is 45% of the initial amount.

Let's denote [Na₂]₀ as the initial concentration of Na₂ and [Na₂]_t as the concentration of Na₂ at time t. We can express the remaining concentration as:

[Na₂]_t = 0.45 [Na₂]₀

Now, we can substitute the given values into the first-order rate equation:

Rate = k [Na₂]₀

At t = 10 minutes, the concentration is 45% of the initial concentration:

Rate = k [Na₂]_t = k (0.45 [Na₂]₀)

To find the rate constant k, we need to determine the reaction rate. The reaction rate can be calculated using the formula:

Rate = (Δ[Na₂]) / (Δt)

Since the reaction is isothermal, the change in concentration can be calculated using:

Δ[Na₂] = [Na₂]₀ - [Na₂]_t

Δt = 10 minutes

Plugging in the values, we have:

Rate = (0.55 [Na₂]₀) / (10 minutes)

We know that the reaction rate is also equal to k times the concentration [Na₂]₀:

Rate = k [Na₂]₀

Equating the two expressions for the reaction rate, we can solve for the rate constant k:

k [Na₂]₀ = (0.55 [Na₂]₀) / (10 minutes)

Simplifying, we find:

k = (0.55 [Na₂]₀) / (10 minutes * [Na₂]₀)

k = 0.055 minutes⁻¹

Learn more about rate law at https://brainly.com/question/26127112

#SPJ11

To determine the limiting reactant, we need to compare the mole ratios of N₂ and H₂ in the feed mixture with the stoichiometric ratio of the reaction. The stoichiometric ratio of N₂ to H₂ is 1:3.

A)Given that the N₂ molar fraction in the feed is 0.1 and the N₂ molar flow rate is 10 mol/s, we can calculate the actual moles of N₂ in the feed:

Actual moles of N₂ = N₂ molar fraction * N₂ molar flow = 0.1 * 10 = 1 mol/s

Next, we need to calculate the actual moles of H₂ in the feed:

Actual moles of H₂ = (1 mol/s) * (3 mol H₂ / 1 mol N₂) = 3 mol/s

Since the actual moles of N₂ (1 mol/s) are less than the moles of H₂ (3 mol/s), N₂ is the limiting reactant.

b) A stoichiometric table can be constructed to show the initial moles, moles reacted, and final moles of each species:

Species | Initial Moles | Moles Reacted | Final Moles

--------------------------------------------------

N₂      | 1 mol         |               | 1 - x mol

H₂      | 3 mol         |               | 3 - 3x mol

NH₃     | 0 mol         |               | 2x mol

c) In the stoichiometric table, "x" represents the extent of reaction or the fraction of N₂ that has been converted to NH₃. At 80% conversion, x = 0.8.

The values of CA, CB, and CC at 80% conversion can be calculated by substituting x = 0.8 into the stoichiometric table:

CA (concentration of N₂) = (1 mol/s) - (1 mol/s * 0.8) = 0.2 mol/s

CB (concentration of H₂) = (3 mol/s) - (3 mol/s * 0.8) = 0.6 mol/s

CC (concentration of NH₃) = (2 mol/s * 0.8) = 1.6 mol/s

d) The final concentrations of all species at 80% conversion are:

[ N₂ ] = 0.2 mol/s

[ H₂ ] = 0.6 mol/s

[ NH₃ ] = 1.6 mol/s

These concentrations represent the amounts of each species present in the reaction mixture after 80% of the N₂ has been converted to NH₃.

know more about stoichiometric :brainly.com/question/24663542

#SPJ11

Answer:

a) how many mg of n/ kg of soil is mineralized every year? Nitrogen mineralized every year = 60 mg N/kg of soil

b)the mass of the soil is 2,000,000 kg/ha, calculate the kg of n mineralized/ ha of soil.

120 kg/ha of nitrogen is mineralized every year.

Explanation:

To calculate the amount of nitrogen mineralized every year, we can use the formula:

Nitrogen mineralized every year = Nitrogen in organic forms x Mineralization rate

From the problem statement, we know that the soil contains 2000 mg N/kg of soil in organic forms and the rate of mineralization is 3% per year.

Substituting these values into the formula above, we get:

Nitrogen mineralized every year = 2000 mg N/kg of soil x 3%

Nitrogen mineralized every year = 60 mg N/kg of soil

To calculate the kg of N mineralized/ha of soil, we can use the formula:

kg of N mineralized/ha of soil = (Nitrogen mineralized every year x Mass of soil)/1000

From the problem statement, we know that the mass of the soil is 2 000 000 kg/ha.

Substituting these values into the formula above, we get:

kg of N mineralized/ha of soil = (60 mg N/kg of soil x 2 000 000 kg/ha)/1000

kg of N mineralized/ha of soil = 120 kg/ha

Therefore, 120 kg/ha of nitrogen is mineralized every year.

The spontaneous deposition of silver onto gold in a solution of AgNO3(aq) does not occur due to the difference in their reduction potentials.

Spontaneous deposition of a metal occurs when it has a lower reduction potential than the metal it is being deposited onto. In this case, gold has a lower reduction potential than silver.

The reduction potential is a measure of the tendency of a species to gain electrons and undergo reduction. Gold has a relatively low reduction potential, indicating that it has a lower tendency to gain electrons and be reduced compared to silver. On the other hand, silver has a higher reduction potential, indicating a greater tendency to be reduced and gain electrons.

In the solution of AgNO3(aq), silver ions (Ag+) are present, which can potentially be reduced to form silver atoms (Ag). However, since gold has a lower reduction potential than silver, it does not have a strong enough tendency to reduce the silver ions and replace them with gold atoms. Therefore, the silver does not spontaneously deposit onto the gold necklace.

To achieve the desired silver coating on the gold necklace, an external source of electrons or a reducing agent would be required to facilitate the reduction of silver ions onto the gold surface.

For more questions on electrons, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/860094

#SPJ8

The total amount of sulfur dioxide (SO2) emitted during the inversion event in London (1952) can be calculated as follows:

Total SO2 emitted = Total coal burned × Sulfur content of coal.

To calculate the total amount of sulfur dioxide emitted, we need to use the following information:

Total coal burned: 25,000 metric tons

Sulfur content of coal: 4% (expressed as a decimal)

First, we need to convert the sulfur content from a percentage to a decimal:

Sulfur content = 4% = 4/100 = 0.04

Next, we can calculate the total amount of sulfur dioxide emitted:

Total SO2 emitted = 25,000 metric tons × 0.04

To calculate the mass of sulfur dioxide emitted in grams, we can convert metric tons to grams:

1 metric ton = 1,000,000 grams

Total SO2 emitted = (25,000 × 1,000,000) grams × 0.04

Lastly, we need to consider the mixing depth or inversion height of 150 m. The mixing depth represents the vertical extent of the pollution trapped under the inversion layer. To calculate the volume of the polluted air, we multiply the area (1200 km²) by the mixing depth (150 m):

Volume of polluted air = Area × Mixing depth

To convert the area from km² to m², we multiply by 1,000,000 (since 1 km² = 1,000,000 m²):

Area = 1200 km² × 1,000,000 m²/km²

With the volume of polluted air, we can determine the concentration of sulfur dioxide:

Concentration of SO2 = Total SO2 emitted / Volume of polluted air

To obtain the total amount of sulfur dioxide emitted during the London inversion event in 1952, we multiply the total coal burned by the sulfur content of the coal. The area and mixing depth are used to calculate the volume of polluted air, which helps determine the concentration of sulfur dioxide.

To learn more about inversion ,visit

brainly.com/question/25737062

#SPJ11

Here is  the pairing of elements with their respective electron behaviors:

Electron loss and electron gain refer to the transfer of electrons between atoms during chemical reactions, specifically in the formation of chemical bonds.

Electron loss and electron gain are fundamental processes in chemical reactions, as they allow atoms to achieve a more stable electron configuration by attaining a full valence shell, similar to the noble gases. This transfer of electrons leads to the formation of ionic bonds between positively and negatively charged ions or can contribute to the formation of covalent bonds by sharing electrons between atoms.

Learn more about electrons at: https://brainly.com/question/31620742

#SPJ1

(a) The quantity of heat released in the production of 800 kg of SO₃ is approximately 119,819 kJ. (c) Approximately 2,537 kg of steam is produced when 85% of the heat generated is supplied to the boiler.

To solve this problem, we need to use the balanced chemical equation for the reaction between pyrite and oxygen to produce sulfur trioxide:

4FeS₂ + 11O₂ → 2Fe₂O₃ + 8SO₃

Given that the production of 800 kg of SO₃ is desired, we can use stoichiometry to determine the amount of pyrite required.

From the balanced equation, we see that 8 moles of SO₃ are produced from 4 moles of FeS₂. The molar mass of FeS₂ is approximately 119.98 g/mol.

Step 1: Calculate the moles of SO₃ produced.

Moles of SO₃ = mass of SO₃ / molar mass of SO₃

Moles of SO₃ = 800 kg / (32.07 g/mol)

Moles of SO₃ = 24.93 mol

Step 2: Calculate the moles of FeS₂ required.

From the stoichiometry of the balanced equation, we know that 4 moles of FeS₂ produce 8 moles of SO₃.

Moles of FeS₂ = (24.93 mol × 4 mol) / 8 mol

Moles of FeS₂ = 12.465 mol

Step 3: Calculate the mass of FeS₂ required.

Mass of FeS₂ = moles of FeS₂ × molar mass of FeS₂

Mass of FeS₂ = 12.465 mol × 119.98 g/mol

Mass of FeS₂ = 1,495.03 g or 1.495 kg

Now let's move on to the next part of the question.

(a) To calculate the quantity of heat released in kJ, we need to determine the enthalpy change of the reaction.

The enthalpy change can be found using the enthalpy of formation values for the reactants and products involved. Given that the reaction takes place at 850°C, we need to consider the enthalpy of formation values at that temperature.

The enthalpy change for the reaction can be calculated using the following equation:

ΔH = ΣΔH(products) - ΣΔH(reactants)

Using the enthalpy of formation values at 850°C:

ΔH(Fe₂O₃) = -825 kJ/mol

ΔH(SO₃) = -395 kJ/mol

ΔH = (2 × ΔH(Fe₂O₃)) + (8 × ΔH(SO₃))

ΔH = (2 × -825 kJ/mol) + (8 × -395 kJ/mol)

ΔH = -1650 kJ/mol - 3160 kJ/mol

ΔH = -4810 kJ/mol

The negative sign indicates that the reaction is exothermic, releasing heat.

Now, we can calculate the quantity of heat released for the production of 800 kg of SO₃:

Quantity of heat released = ΔH × moles of SO₃

Quantity of heat released = -4810 kJ/mol × 24.93 mol

Quantity of heat released = -119,819.3 kJ

Quantity of heat released ≈ 119,819 kJ (rounded to the nearest kJ)

(b) To calculate the entropy of reaction, we need to consider the entropy values of the reactants and products. However, the question does not provide the necessary entropy values. Without this information, it's not possible to calculate the entropy of the reaction.

(c) If 85% of the heat generated in (a) is supplied to a boiler to transform liquid water at 20°C and 1 atm to superheated steam at 120°C and 1 atm, we can calculate the mass of steam produced using the specific heat capacity and latent heat of vaporization of water.

The heat required to convert liquid water to steam can be calculated using the equation:

Heat = mass × (enthalpy of vaporization + specific heat capacity × (final temperature - initial temperature))

We need to find the mass of water and then use the given 85% of the heat generated in part (a).

Given:

Initial temperature (liquid water) = 20°C

Final temperature (superheated steam) = 120°C

Pressure = 1 atm

Using the specific heat capacity of water (C) = 4.18 kJ/(kg·K) and the enthalpy of vaporization of water (ΔHvap) = 40.7 kJ/mol, we can proceed with the calculations.

Let's assume the mass of water is "m" kg.

Heat = 0.85 × 119,819 kJ

Heat = m × (40.7 kJ/mol + 4.18 kJ/(kg·K) × (120°C - 20°C))

0.85 × 119,819 kJ = m × (40.7 kJ/mol + 4.18 kJ/(kg·K) × 100 K)

Solving for "m":

m = (0.85 × 119,819 kJ) / (40.7 kJ/mol + 4.18 kJ/(kg·K) × 100 K)

m ≈ 2,537 kg (rounded to the nearest kilogram)

Therefore, approximately 2,537 kg of steam will be produced when 85% of the heat generated is supplied to the boiler.

Learn more about Exothermic reaction here: brainly.com/question/28546817

#SPJ11

Industrial ecology can help to reduce resource depletion, pollution, and waste generation, and promote economic and social benefits.

BOL Gases plays the role of a decomposer farm in the given scenario by transforming a waste product from the oil refinery into a valuable resource for the Green City buses.

a) i. An industrial ecosystem diagram typically depicts the interconnectedness of various industries, illustrating the flow of resources, energy, and by-products among them.

The diagram showcases the concept of industrial symbiosis, where waste or by-products from one industry become resources for another industry, promoting resource efficiency and reducing environmental impacts.

The benefits of industrial ecology and the triple bottom line (TBL) approach include:

ii. In the given scenario, the company BOL Gases plays the role of a decomposer farm. A decomposer in an industrial ecosystem breaks down and processes waste or by-products from other industries, turning them into valuable resources for further use.

BOL Gases separates, cleans, and pressurizes the hydrogen by-product from the oil refinery, transforming it into purified hydrogen fuel for the Green City buses.

To know more about ecosystem, here:

brainly.com/question/19267717

#SPJ4

The number of grams of [tex]ZnBr_2[/tex] that can be produced from 7.86 moles of HBr is approximately 884.33 grams.

To determine the number of grams of [tex]ZnBr_2[/tex] that can be produced from 7.86 moles of HBr, we need to use the stoichiometry of the balanced chemical equation.

From the balanced equation:

1 mole of Zn + 2 moles of HBr produce 1 mole of [tex]ZnBr_2[/tex]

First, we need to calculate the number of moles of [tex]ZnBr_2[/tex] produced from 7.86 moles of HBr. Since the stoichiometric ratio between HBr and [tex]ZnBr_2[/tex] is 2:1, we divide 7.86 moles of HBr by 2 to find the moles of [tex]ZnBr_2[/tex]produced:

7.86 moles HBr ÷ 2 = 3.93 moles [tex]ZnBr_2[/tex]

Next, we can calculate the mass of [tex]ZnBr_2[/tex] using the molar mass:

Mass = Moles × Molar Mass

Mass = 3.93 moles × 225.18 g/mol

Calculating the mass of [tex]ZnBr_2[/tex]:

Mass = 884.334 g

Therefore, the number of grams of [tex]ZnBr_2[/tex] that can be produced from 7.86 moles of HBr is approximately 884.33 grams.

Know more about molar mass    here:

https://brainly.com/question/837939

#SPJ8

The standard enthalpy of combustion of propene can be determined using Hess's Law by subtracting the enthalpy of hydrogenation of propene from the enthalpy of combustion of propene, yielding -2096 kJ/mol.

According to Hess's Law, the overall enthalpy change of a reaction is independent of the pathway taken and depends only on the initial and final states. We can use this principle to calculate the standard enthalpy of combustion of propene by manipulating the given reactions.

First, we need to reverse the hydrogenation reaction and multiply it by a factor to balance the number of moles of propene. This gives us:

CH3CH2CH3(g) → 3CH2=CHCH3(g) + 3H2(g) ΔH = +124 kJ/mol

Next, we need to multiply the combustion reaction by a factor to balance the number of moles of propene and reverse it:

3CH3CH2CH3(g) + 15O2(g) → 9CO2(g) + 12H2O(g) ΔH = +2220 kJ/mol

Finally, we need to multiply the water formation reaction by a factor and reverse it:

6H2(g) + 3O2(g) → 6H2O(g) ΔH = +858 kJ/mol

Now, we can add up the three manipulated reactions to obtain the desired reaction, which is the combustion of propene:

3CH2=CHCH3(g) + 15O2(g) → 9CO2(g) + 12H2O(g) ΔH = ?

By summing up the enthalpy changes of the three reactions, we get:

ΔH = (+124 kJ/mol) + (+2220 kJ/mol) + (-858 kJ/mol) = +1486 kJ/mol

However, this value corresponds to the enthalpy change for the combustion of three moles of propene. To find the enthalpy change for one mole of propene, we divide the value by three:

ΔH = +1486 kJ/mol ÷ 3 = +495.33 kJ/mol

Therefore, the standard enthalpy of combustion of propene is approximately -495.33 kJ/mol.

To learn more about Hess's Law click here, brainly.com/question/31508978

#SPJ11

To generate a force of 500 g's in the centrifuge bowl spinning at 1600 rev/min, a radius of approximately 0.208 meters is needed.

To calculate the radius of the centrifuge bowl needed to generate a force of 500 g's, we can use the following formula:

g-force = (radius × angular velocity²) / gravitational constant

Given:

Angular velocity = 1600 rev/min

g-force = 500 g's

convert the angular velocity from rev/min to rad/s:

Angular velocity in rad/s = (1600 rev/min) × (2π rad/rev) / (60 s/min)

Angular velocity in rad/s ≈ 167.55 rad/s

Next, we convert the g-force to acceleration in m/s²:

Acceleration in m/s² = (500 g's) × (9.81 m/s²/g)

Acceleration in m/s² ≈ 4905 m/s²

Now rearrange the formula to solve for the radius:

radius = √((g-force × gravitational constant) / angular velocity²)

Plugging in the values, we get:

radius ≈ √((4905 m/s² × 9.81 m/s²) / (167.55 rad/s)²)

radius ≈ √((4905 × 9.81) / (167.55)²) meters

Calculating the value, we find that the radius is approximately 0.208 meters.

To generate a force of 500 g's in the centrifuge bowl spinning at 1600 rev/min, a radius of approximately 0.208 meters is needed.

To know more about radius, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13126562

#SPJ11

To determine the transfer function 7'(s)/T'(s) for the reactor, we can use the material balance equation and the heat balance equation.

Material balance equation: The rate of change of the reactant concentration in the reactor is given by: d[FA]/dt = F - k[FA][FB]. Here, [FA] and [FB] are the concentrations of reactants A and B, F is the flow rate of the inlet stream, and k is the rate constant for the reaction. Taking the Laplace transform of the material balance equation, assuming zero initial conditions, we get: s[F'(s)] = F(s) - k[FA'(s)][FB(s)].  Rearranging the equation, we obtain: [FA'(s)]/[F'(s)] = 1 / (s + k[FB(s)]). This represents the transfer function 7'(s)/T'(s) for the reactor.

The time constant can be negative if the denominator of the transfer function has a negative coefficient of s. This can happen if the rate constant k is negative or if [FB(s)] is a negative function. However, a negative time constant is not physically meaningful in this context. A negative time constant implies that the response of the reactor is not stable and exhibits unphysical behavior. It can lead to oscillations or exponential growth/decay in the reactor behavior, which is not desirable in a chemical system. In practice, the time constant should be positive to ensure stability and reliable control of the reactor.

To learn more about balance equation click here: brainly.com/question/31242898

#SPJ11

a) The table below displays the total CO2e per year, CO2e per person per year, GDP per person per year, and CO2e per person per year per GDP for Australia, Canada, Indonesia, Fiji, and Kenya:

| Country  | Total CO2e per year (Mt) | CO2e per person per year (t) | GDP per person per year (US$) | CO2e per person per year per GDP |
| -------- | ----------------------- | --------------------------- | ---------------------------- | -------------------------------- |
| Australia | 535.3                   | 22.08                       | 44,073                       | 0.50                             |
| Canada   | 729.9                   | 19.43                       | 43,034                       | 0.45                             |
| Indonesia | 1,811.1                 | 6.84                        | 3,898                        | 0.18                             |
| Fiji     | 0.9                     | 1.01                        | 5,586                        | 0.02                             |
| Kenya    | 64.5                    | 1.24                        | 1,797                        | 0.07                             |

The data is taken from the Global Carbon Atlas, the World Bank, and the United Nations.

b) The implications of this data with regards to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are as follows:

SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy: The countries with higher CO2e per person per year tend to have higher GDP per person per year. Therefore, they have the financial resources to invest in clean energy and reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. In contrast, countries with lower GDP per person per year tend to have lower CO2e per person per year, but they also have less capacity to invest in clean energy. Thus, achieving affordable and clean energy for all requires addressing the economic disparities between countries.

SDG 13 - Climate Action: The countries with higher CO2e per year contribute more to climate change than those with lower CO2e per year. However, all countries need to take action to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to limit the global temperature rise to below 2 degrees Celsius. Therefore, developed countries must take the lead in reducing their emissions, while developing countries should receive support to transition to a low-carbon economy.

to know about Sustainable Development Goals

https://brainly.com/question/19956954

#SPJ11