Can someone answer one or two questions that are not answered I need help and I’d highly appreciate if you can help me:)

Answer:

al chile no se

Explanation:

Answer:

The judicial branch comprises of state and federal courts, as well as the judges who are in these courts. The judicial branch can interpret the laws, such as declaring amendments or laws trying to be passed as unconstitutional. There are limits to the judicial branch though, as they can interpret the laws they cannot enforce them. Meaning the Supreme Court also cannot have a jury at impeachment.

Answer:

first law

Explanation:

Answer:

b

Explanation:

pls mark as brainliest have a great day

Answer:

Since the late 1930s, conventional wisdom has held that President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “New Deal” helped bring about the end of the Great Depression. The series of social and government spending programs did get millions of Americans back to work on hundreds of public projects across the country.

But in the 80 years since the Great Depression was formally declared over in June of 1938, historians and economists have continued to debate the true merits of the New Deal and whether, in fact, the radical government spending programs brought about the end of the biggest economic downturn in history.

Explanation:

Answer:

5

Explanation:

The function of adverb is to modify a verb and Often is modifying the verb "Go".

Answer:

The answer is often

Explanation:

It's because the verb is go and often is adding to it :p

Answer:

During the 70 years of the Soviet era, women's roles were complex. Women in Soviet Russia became a vital part of the mobilization into the work force, and this opening of women into sectors that were previously unattainable allowed opportunities for education, personal development, and training.

Answer:

not much but not less

Explanation:

we can not do much but we can maybe vote or tell our thoughts about what the government is doing

The question above is intended to assess your ability to write an essay and interpret the importance of culture and cultural heritage. For that reason, I can't write an essay for you, but I'll show you how to write it.

First, you should research what cultural heritage is, how it is formed and how important it is in society. This research must be done in articles and other essays that deal with this theme.

After that, you can write your essay as follows:

More information:

https://brainly.com/question/13159899?referrer=searchResults

Explanation:

A conflict should end in win win situation". It means a chance to achieve a "mutually beneficial outcome" for both the parties which are involved in the situation.

Explanation:

He was a famous orator. In the hot-tempered times before the Civil War, he wanted to preserve the Union—even if that meant compromise. He thundered, "Slavery is wrong!" but to keep the southern states from seceding, he supported the Compromise of 1850 allowing slavery in new territories.

Answer:

Emmanuel de Grouchy

Explanation:

The most recent promotions to marshal came in 1815, two years after a break on routine promotions to the rank, when Napoleon promoted Emmanuel de Grouchy, one of his Generals, to the dignity.

Answer:

The protestant reformation was a religious reform that started around the 1500's It resulted in a new branch of Christianity called Protestantism and separated itself from the Roman Catholic Church. This was caused by a difference in doctrine between the two.

The counter reformation served to solidify the doctrine that the protestants opposed this includes the authority of the pope the veneration of saints etc.

hope this helps :)

Explanation:

Answer:

A. They won the support of immigrants.

Judicial Independence means the ability of courts and judges to be able to perform their duties without any influence from others.

This is an incomplete question and therefore an overview of judicial independence will be given. Judicial Independence explains that the judiciary should be independent from the other branches of government.

Judicial Independence posits that the courts and judges should not be subject to improper influence from either partisan or private interests. Some of the core values that are represented in judicial independence include integrity, equality, diligence, impartiality, competence, and propriety.

Read related link on:

https://brainly.com/question/8517354

Answer:

You know sometimes reading the lesson really helps you progress in school and makes it alot easier on you so you dont have to be here

Explanation:

Explanation:

Without freedom of the media our newspapers would lose much of their value.

Prejudice is best defined as an irrational generalization about an entire category of people.

Prejudice can be described as a preconceived judgment that a person or group would have against other people that is not always backed by facts, experience or reason.

People may be prejudiced against others that are from a different cultural background as they are.

It is just an assumption that people have of others simply because they belong to a different group.

Read more on https://brainly.com/question/1100501?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

Washington D.C is the answer

Answer:

um

Explanation:

....................

The constitutional provision common in Everson v. Board of Education of the Township of Ewing (1947) and Engel v. Vitale (1962) is "the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment."

The First Amendment's Establishment Clause is used in Everson v. Board of Education of the Township of Ewing (1947) to apply the First Amendment's religion clauses at the state level.

Similarly, in the case of Engel v. Vitale (1962), the same Establishment Clause of the First Amendment was used to rule that the school prayer was unconstitutional.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment."

Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/9194486

The constitutional provision common in both Everson v. Board of Education of the Township of Ewing (1947) and Engel v. Vitale (1962) is the First Amendment clause on state sponsorship of religion.

In Engel v. Vitale, the Supreme Court ruled that it was not constitutional for the government to write a prayer for people to recite. However, in Everson v. Board of Education (1947), the Supreme Court ruled that the provision for the transportation of school children in religious schools did not violate the separation of state and religion. It relied upon the Fourteen Amendment to make the judgment.

Thus, in both cases, the common constitutional provision is the First Amendment that forbade government sponsorship of religion.

Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/18557767

Answer:

depends if that idea is to recreate the dinosaurs then the answer is false, but if you are thinking of more logical things, then the answer is true.

Explanation:

Answer:

You can clearly tell that this is trying to persuade you into buying a product. this may work if they like the person selling the product. because it says "you buy one, lest I perish."

Explanation:

Have A nice Day!!!

Answer:

Kabir

Namdev

Guru Nanak

Ramanuja

Answer:

The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland remained officially neutral throughout the American Civil War (1861–1865). ... The British elite tended to support the Confederacy, but ordinary people tended to support the Union.

Explanation:

According to my knowledge

Answer:

The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland remained officially neutral throughout the American Civil War (1861–1865). ... The British elite tended to support the Confederacy, but ordinary people tended to support the Union.

Why did the British get involved in the Civil War?

The reason behind Great Britain's involvement within the American Civil War was primarily economic interest. In the mid-nineteenth century, a vast majority of the world's cotton was produced within the Southern States of America.

hope this helped!!

Answer: Akkadian

Explanation:

If your in 6-8th grade then its this

The correct diagram matches the early Mesopotamian civilization of the Hittites with one of their accomplishments, which was the development of the first code of laws in Mesopotamia.

The Hittite civilization was located in present day Turkey and dates back to approximately 1600 BC. They were known for their advanced architectural and engineering skills and for their warlike nature. They were also known for their diplomatic skills, successful trade networks, and use of chariots to expand their empire throughout the Middle East.

It was during this time that they developed one of the earliest known codes of laws. This code of law was used to govern their own people and served as a basis for establishing governing principles for many of their conquered territories. These laws were not only used to punish criminals and address civil matters, but were also used to offer protection for those under the rule of the Hittite empire. These laws would go on to form the basis of many law systems throughout the Middle East and beyond.

To know more about Mesopotamian civilization , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30714510

#SPJ3

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

Answer:

Boss Tweed, in full William Magear Tweed, erroneously called William Marcy Tweed, (born April 3, 1823, New York, New York, U.S.—died April 12, 1878, New York), American politician who, with his “Tweed ring” cronies, systematically plundered New York City of sums estimated at between $30 million and $200 million.

FAST FACTS

Facts & Related Content

William Magear Tweed

William Magear Tweed

See all media

Born: April 3, 1823 New York City New York

Died: April 12, 1878 (aged 55) New York City New York

Political Affiliation: Democratic Party

Tweed was a bookkeeper and a volunteer fireman when elected alderman on his second try in 1851, and the following year he was also elected to a term in Congress. He gradually strengthened his position in Tammany Hall (the executive committee of New York City’s Democratic Party organization), and in 1856 he was elected to a new, bipartisan city board of supervisors, after which he held other important positions in the city government. Meanwhile, he managed to have his cronies named to other key city and county posts, thus establishing what became the Tweed ring. By 1860 he headed Tammany Hall’s general committee and thus controlled the Democratic Party’s nominations to all city positions. In that same year he opened a law office through which he received large fees from various corporations for his “legal services.” He became a state senator in 1868 and also became grand sachem (principal leader) of Tammany Hall that same year. Tweed dominated the Democratic Party in both the city and the state and had his candidates elected mayor of New York City, governor, and speaker of the state assembly.

In 1870 Tweed forced the passage of a new city charter creating a board of audit by means of which he and his associates could control the city treasury. The Tweed ring then proceeded to milk the city through such devices as faked leases, padded bills, false vouchers, unnecessary repairs, and overpriced goods and services bought from suppliers controlled by the ring. Vote fraud at elections was rampant. While addressing later corruption in St. Louis in a 1902 article for McClure’s magazine called “Tweed Days in St. Louis,” Lincoln Steffens and Claude H. Wetmore wrote:

The Tweed regime in New York taught Tammany to organize its boodle business; the police exposure taught it to improve its method of collecting blackmail.

Toppling Tweed became the prime goal of a growing reform movement. Exposed at last by The New York Times, the satiric cartoons of Thomas Nast in Harper’s Weekly, and the efforts of a reform lawyer, Samuel J. Tilden, Tweed was tried on charges of forgery and larceny. He was convicted and sentenced to prison (1873) but was released in 1875. Rearrested on a civil charge, he was convicted and imprisoned, but he escaped to Cuba and then to Spain. Again arrested and extradited to the United States, he was confined again to jail in New York City, where he died.

Thomas Nast: Boss Tweed and the Tweed ring

Thomas Nast: Boss Tweed and the Tweed ring

Boss Tweed and the Tweed ring depicted as a group of vultures by cartoonist Thomas Nast in Harper's Weekly, September 23, 1871.

Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.

Thomas Nast: “The Tammany Tiger Loose”

Thomas Nast: “The Tammany Tiger Loose”

Political cartoon by Thomas Nast critical of Boss Tweed's machinations in Tammany Hall, published in Harper's Weekly, November 11, 1871.

Rare Book and Special Collections Division/Library of Congress, Washington, D.C.

Thomas Nast: “Naturalization Mill”

Thomas Nast: “Naturalization Mill”

“Naturalization Mill,” a cartoon by Thomas Nast for Harper's Weekly, October 24, 1868.

Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.

Thomas Nast: Tammany Hall politics

Thomas Nast: Tammany Hall politics

Tammany Hall politics depicted in a cartoon by Thomas Nast for Harper's Weekly, November 25, 1871.

Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.

Get a Britannica Premium subscription and gain access to exclusive content.

Subscribe Now

The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica

This article was most recently revised and updated by Adam Zeidan, Associate Editor.

Learn More in these related Britannica articles:

Central Park

New York City: Government

…1870—after massive bribery by “Boss” William Magear Tweed—was local police power restored. Tweed’s charter...…

Central Park

New York City: Growth of the metropolis

…the first recognized political “boss,” William Magear Tweed—who never rose higher in the city hierarchy...…

New York: flag

New York: Emergence of political divisions

… machine after 1868 by “Boss” William Magear Tweed, under whose leadership the name Tammany became an...…

newsletter icon

HISTORY AT YOUR FINGERTIPS

Sign up here to see what happened On This Day, every day in your inbox!

Email address

Email address

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Notice.

Answer:

Whereas the Ninth Amendment provides that the enumeration of certain rights in the Constitution does not deny or disparage other unenumerated rights retained by the people, the Tenth Amendment clearly reserves to the states those powers that the Constitution neither delegates to the federal government nor prohibits to the states. The Tenth Amendment does not impose any specific limitations on the authority of the federal government; though there had been an attempt to do so, Congress defeated a motion to modify the word delegated with expressly in the amendment. It thus does not grant states additional powers, nor does it alter the relationship that exists between the federal government and the states. It merely indicates that the states may establish and maintain their own laws and policies so long as they do not conflict with the authority of the federal government.

Explanation: