Can anyone please solve this question

Answer:

is 1,2,3 the answer ? if not what is the answer cuz im doing the same question

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation: I took it on a test and got it right

Answer: 2x

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2x

Step-by-step explanation:

Since there's two negative signs, the product should be positive. Just multiply 1x and 2 together to get the answer. :D

Answer:The exact form is -10/7  the simplified form is -1 3/7

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

i think i am going to pick a random letter because i cant see it ts blocked so i guess c

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

ok so lets assume that line PQ and RS and QR and PS are parallel lines cut by a transeversal. To prove this you can do it in a couple of different ways the one way i know is that if you assume these are parralel then you can uses the alternate interior anges to prove that measure of QSP and SQR then by logic you know that PQS + SQR = RSQ+QSP which symplifies to PQR = RSQ

Answer:

The Y-intercept is the Y value when X = 0.

Find the change in X:

-56 to -42 = 14

-42  to -28 = 14

The X value changes by 14.

For every change in X the Y change:

66-58 = 8

58-50 = 8

For X to get from -28 to 0 would be 2 more changes:

-28 +14 = -14

-14 + 14 = 0

2 more changes of Y would be:

50-8 = 42

42-8 = 34

So when X = 0, Y = 34

The Y-intercept would be (0,34)

Step-by-step explanation:

like if it helps <3

Given :-

To Find :-

Solution:-

Taking the given equⁿ :

[tex]\bf \implies30=\dfrac{5}{6}y[/tex]

[tex]\bf \implies 30\times 6=5y[/tex]

[tex]\bf\implies y=\dfrac{\cancel{30}\times6}{\cancel5}[/tex]

[tex]\underline{\boxed{\red{\bf{\longmapsto \qquad y \qquad = \qquad 36 \qquad}}}}[/tex]

[tex]\boxed{\green{\bf\pink{\dag}\: Hence\:the\:value\:of\:y\:is\:36.}}[/tex]

Some rules :-

On transposing numbers or variables,

Answer:

Definitely

since the definition of a terminating decimal is one that has an ending, and a Repeating decimal is one that never ends.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

hkkkkkkkkv

Step-by-step explanation:

khvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

Answer:

No, 6+3=9 is not an equation.

Step-by-step explanation:

The reason as to why this is not an equation is because an equation is a statement that asserts the equality of two expressions, which are connected by the equal sign. And 6+3=9 does not in fact connect two separate expressions.

so we know that the size of the triangle is decreasing witch means that the scale factor is going to be a fraction. to find this fraction you are going to divide the smaller side by the corisponding longer side.

12/72= 1/6

the correct answer is c 1/6

The scale factor of triangles ABC and DEF is 6.

Option A is the correct answer.

A scale factor is defined as the ratio between the scale of a given original object and a new object,

We have,

From the triangles,

The ratio of the corresponding sides of the two triangles must be equal.

The value of the ratio is the scale factor.

So,

AB/DE = BC/EF = AC/DF

This can be written as,

72/12 = 66/11 = 42/7

6 = 6 = 6

Thus,

The scale factor of triangles ABC and DEF is 6.

Learn more about scale factors here:

https://brainly.com/question/20759556

#SPJ5

Answer:

c

Step-by-step explanation:

c because

Answer:

it doesn't because it's not a set of ordered pairs

Answer:

[tex]x_1 = 1[/tex]

[tex]x_2=0[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is incomplete as the method is not given.

However, the question can still be solved.

Given

[tex]x_1 - x_2 = 1[/tex]

[tex]3x_1 + x_2 = 3[/tex]

Make xi the subject in the first equation

[tex]x_1 = 1 + x_2[/tex]

Substitute 1 + x2 for xi in the second equation

[tex]3(1+x_2)+x_2 = 3[/tex]

Open bracket

[tex]3+3x_2+x_2=3[/tex]

[tex]3+4x_2=3[/tex]

Collect Like Terms

[tex]4x_2 = 3-3[/tex]

[tex]4x_2 =0[/tex]

Solve for x2

[tex]x_2=0/4[/tex]

[tex]x_2=0[/tex]

Recall that:

[tex]x_1 = 1 + x_2[/tex]

[tex]x_1 = 1+0[/tex]

[tex]x_1 = 1[/tex]

Answer:

9 is the answer

Answer:

-3-,2,-1,0,1,2,3,4,5

Step-by-step explanation:

-4<n<6

Answer:

Universal set is 80

Number of people that speak Nepali is 50

Number of people that speak English is 45

Number of people that do not speak both is 7

a. Number of people that speak both languages is 22

b. As above

Step-by-step explanation:

a. Let make number of people that speak both languages x

To get x

(50-x) + (45-x) + x + 7 = 80

(50-x) + (45-x) + x = 80 - 7

(50-x) + (45-x) + x = 73

Open bracket

50-x+45-x+x= 73

50+45-2x+x = 73

95 - x = 73

-x = 73 - 95

-x = -22

x = 22

Therefore, number of people that speak both languages is 22

b. To get venn diagram

Number of people that speak Nepali is 50 - 22 = 28

Number of people that speak English is 45 - 22 = 23

Therefore, total = 28+23+22+7 = 80

Answer:

what do you need help with you did not provide a picture or any evidence

Step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation

Answer:

p = 15/40

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the total number of marbles is 40, that is our size of the sample. there are 16 red ones on that sample, so the probability of extracting a red marble from the box is given by the ratio of successes divided the total number of marbles:

p = 15/40

Given : A rectangular picture frame has a perimeter of 52 inches. The height of the frame is 12 inches.

To Find : The width of the frame .

Solution : Let us take the width of the frame be x . So , we know the formula to find the perimeter of rectangle as ;

[tex]\boxed{\red{\bf Perimeter_{rectangle}=2(l+b)}}[/tex]

Where , l is the length of the rectangle and b is the breadth of the rectangle .

⇒ Perimeter = 2 ( l + b ) .

⇒ 52 in. = 2 ( 12 + x ) in.

⇒ 52 in.= 24in. + 2x .

⇒ 2x =( 52 - 24 ) in

⇒ 2x = 28 in.

⇒ x = 28/2 in.

⇒ x = 14 in.

Hence the width of the rectangle is 14 inches.

Answer:

2 3/5 inches in a year

Step-by-step explanation:

28 1/5 - 25 3/5 = 141/5 - 128/5 = 13/5 = 10/5 + 3/5 = 2 + 3/5 = 2 3/5

Answer:

238, 000

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps </3

Answer:

The  Decision Rule

Fail to reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion

 There is no sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean age of the cars is greater than that of taxi

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The data is  

      Car Ages 4 0 8 11 14 3 4 4 3 5 8 3 3 7 4 6 6 1 8 2 15 11 4 1 6 1 8

     Taxi Ages 8 8 0 3 8 4 3 3 6 11 7 7 6 9 5 10 8 4 3 4

      The  level of significance [tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex]

 Generally the null hypothesis  is  [tex]H_o  :  \mu_1 - \mu_2  = 0[/tex]

                  the alternative hypothesis is   [tex]H_a  :  \mu_1 - \mu_2 >  0[/tex]

Generally the sample mean for the age of  cars is mathematically represented as

        [tex]\= x_1 = \frac{\sum x_i }{n}[/tex]

=>     [tex]\= x_1 = \frac{4+ 0+ 8 +11 + \cdots + 8 }{27}[/tex]

=>     [tex]\= x_1 = 5.56[/tex]

Generally the standard deviation of age of  cars

     [tex]\sigma _1  = \sqrt{\frac{\sum (x_i - \= x)^2}{n_1} }[/tex]

=>  [tex]\sigma _1  = \sqrt{\frac{(4 - 5.56)^2 + (0 - 5.56)^2+ (8 - 5.56)^2 + \cdots + 8}{ 27} }[/tex]

=>  [tex]\sigma _1  =  3.88 [/tex]

Generally the sample mean for the age of taxi is mathematically represented as

        [tex]\= x_2 = \frac{\sum x_i }{n}[/tex]

=>     [tex]\= x_2 = \frac{8 +8 +0  + \cdots + 4 }{20}[/tex]

=>     [tex]\= x_2 = 5.85 [/tex]

Generally the standard deviation of age of  taxi

[tex]\sigma _2  = \sqrt{\frac{\sum (x_i - \= x)^2}{n_1} }[/tex]

=>  [tex]\sigma _2  = \sqrt{\frac{(8 - 5.85)^2 + (8 - 5.85)^2+ (0 - 5.85)^2 + \cdots + 8}{ 20} }[/tex]

=>  [tex]\sigma _2  = 2.83 [/tex]

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

   [tex]t = \frac{(\= x_ 1 - \= x_2 ) - 0}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma^2_1}{n_1}  + \frac{\sigma^2_2}{n_2} }  }[/tex]

=> [tex]t = \frac{(5.56 - 5.85 ) - 0}{\sqrt{\frac{(3.88)^2}{27}  + \frac{(2.83)}{20} }}[/tex]  

=> [tex]t = -0.30 [/tex]  

Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically  represented as

   [tex]df =  n_1 + n_2 -2[/tex]

    [tex]df =  27 +  20 -2[/tex]

    [tex]df =  45[/tex]

From the t distribution table  the [tex]P(t >  t )[/tex] at the obtained degree of freedom = 45 is  

   [tex]P(t >  -0.30 ) = 0.61722067[/tex]

So  the  p-value  is

    [tex]p-value  =  P(t >  T) =  0.61722067[/tex]

From the obtained values we see that the  p-value  >  [tex]\alpha [/tex] hence we fail to reject the null hypothesis

Hence the there is no sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean age of the cars is greater than that of taxi

Answer:

S = 1 bag of popcorn

Y = 1 water

Step-by-step explanation:

S x 3 + Y x 4 = R

40 - R = (The Answer)

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  1 solution

Step-by-step explanation:

The coefficients of d are different on the two sides of the equation (3d vs 6d), so the equation has one solution.

__

Dividing by 3 gives ...

  d +11 = 2(d +33)

  d + 11 = 2d + 66

Adding -d-66 to both sides gives ...

  -55 = d . . . . . . the one solution

Answer:

The answer is B

Step-by-step explanation:

i took the test and 1 was correct so.

Answer:boo

Step-by-step explanation:booooo

Answer:

5 7/12 + 4 6/12 = 9 13/12 is correct but 9 13/12 is equal to 10 1/12 not 1 1/12  because 13/12 is 1 1/12 and you have to add 1 1/12 to 9. So the error analysis is simplifying  9 13/12 to 1 1/12.

Answer: x = 2

If x is the width of the window, the value for x that results in the greatest area-- presumably admitting the greatest amount of light.

Step-by-step explanation:

Initial calculations to find a starting value for w.

Determine dimensions that will have a sum of 8 as the perimeter. The length of the arc plus three sides of the rectangle.

The length of the arc is  half the circumference of the circle, the width is the diameter. So, modifying the equation: C= πd,  a = πw/2

Three sides of a rectangle (presumably a square for the initial calculation) 3w

Initial equation: 3w + πw/2 = 8    Substitute 3.14 for π  and solve for w

2(3w) + 2(3.14w/2) = 2(8)   multiply all terms by 2 to eliminate denominator

6w + 3.14w = 16   combine like terms

9.14w  = 16   divide both sides by 9.14

w ≈ 1.75

Calculate the area using this value:

Area of semicircle:  πr²/2   r= 1.75/2  

3.14(.875)²/2 ≈ 1.203

Area of rectangle  1.75 × 1.75 = 3.0625

Total Area with width 1.75  :  4.265 ft²

Increasing the width to 2

The length of the arc becomes 3.14   This is twice the area of the semicircle.

3.14/2 = 1.57

The height of the rectangle reduces to 1.43

1.43 × 2 = 2.86

Total area with width of 2 ft   2.86 + 1.57 = 4.43 ft²

So 2 ft seems to be the optimal width.