Answer:
The United States Constitution has had influence internationally on later constitutions and legal thinking. Its influence appears in similarities of phrasing and borrowed passages in other constitutions. As well as in the principles of the rule of law. Separation of powers and recognition of individual rights.
Answer:
After the Cold War ended, promoting the international spread of democracy seemed poised to replace containment as the guiding principle of U.S. foreign policy. Scholars, policymakers, and commentators embraced the idea that democratization could become America's next mission. In recent years, however, critics have argued that spreading democracy may be unwise or even harmful. This paper addresses this debate. It argues that the United States should promote democracy and refutes some of the most important arguments against U.S. efforts to spread democracy. After a brief discussion of definitions of democracy and liberalism, the paper summarizes the reasons why the spread of democracy— especially liberal democracy— benefits the citizens of new democracies, promotes international peace, and serves U.S. interests. Because the case for democratization is rarely made comprehensively, the paper explicates the arguments for why democracy promotes liberty, prevents famines, and fosters economic development. The logic and evidence of a democratic peace are also summarized, as are the ways in which U.S. security and economic interests would be advanced in a world of democracies. These benefits to U.S. interests include a reduction in threats to the United States, fewer refugees attempting to enter the United States, and better economic partners for American trade and investment. The paper then turns to a rebuttal of four prominent recent arguments against the benefits of spreading democracy: (1) the claim that the democratic peace is a myth; (2) the argument that the process of democratization increases the risk of war; (3) arguments that democratic elections are harmful in societies that are not fully liberal; and (4) claims that "Asian values" can undergird polities based on "soft authoritarianism" that are superior to liberal democracies. The paper argues that these recent critiques of U.S. efforts to promote democracy have not presented a convincing case that spreading democracy is a bad idea. The internationa spread of democracy will offer many benefits to new democracies and to the United States. The democratic peace proposition appears robust, even if scholars need to continue to develop multiple explanations for why democracies rarely, if ever, go to war. The evidence on whether democratization increases the risk of war is mixed, at best, and policies can be crafted to minimize any risks of conflict in these cases. The problem of "illiberal democracy" has been exaggerated; democratic elections usually do more good than harm. The United States should, however, aim to promote liberal values as well as electoral democracy. And the "soft authoritarian" challenge to liberal democracy was not persuasive, even before the Asian economic turmoil of 1997 and 1998 undermined claims for the superiority of "Asian values."
Introduction
In recent years, however, many writers have criticized the idea that the United States should attempt to spread democracy. The Clinton administration's commitment to spreading democracy seems to have faltered, and critics from across the political spectrum have argued that the United States should scale back or abandon efforts to foster global democratization.4 In a prominent article, Robert Kaplan has argued that holding democratic elections in many countries may actually hinder efforts to maintain ethnic peace, social stability, and economic development.5 Fareed Zakaria has suggested that elections in countries without liberal values create illiberal democracies, which pose grave threats to freedom.6
This paper argues that the United States should make promoting democracy abroad one of its central foreign-policy goals. Democracy is not an unalloyed good and the United States should not blindly attempt to spread democracy to the exclusion of all other goals, but U.S. and global interests would be advanced if the world contained more democracies. It often will be difficult for the United States and other actors to help countries to become democracies, but international efforts frequently can make a difference. The United States can promote democracy. In many cases it should.
I develop the argument for promoting democracy in three parts. The first section of this paper defines democracy and the closely related concept of liberalism. It distinguishes between democratic procedures of government and the political philosophy of liberalism, but also explains how the two are closely linked.
Explanation:
peacemaking criminology argues that (1)_____ is deeply rooted in the concept of(2)______
fill in the blanks
1. violence, justice
2. peace, greed
Answer:
Its actually justice and peace
Explanation:
I took the plato/edmentum test ;3
62. What is one right that only applies to United States citizens?
A.speak freely
B.own a weapon
C. practice a religion
D. run for feder office
Answer:
A to speak freely hope it hopes beb
Answer:
D. run for feder office
What is the process of working for a client whose opponent is on the opposite side called?
A. trial by jury
B. Germanic tradition
C. taking the stand
D. adversarial
Answer:
D.Adversarial
Explanation:
Answer:
Adversarial
Explanation:
"The American legal system is known as an adversarial due process system. In order to understand what this means, it is helpful to take each term on its own. Once you understand each term, you can combine them to understand what this description of the American legal system truly means. Adversarial means that, within the context of a court case, the two sides are adversaries, or opponents. "
BRAINLIEST!! How has the American model of democracy has affected the cause of civil rights around the world.
Answer:
ummmmmmmmm im here
Explanation:
it caused mess
How does Medicare for All promote equality in our health care system? Please provide evidence to support how it does.
Answer:
Medicare for All would guarantee that everyone in the U.S. can get the health care they need regardless of their ability to pay. They would be able to receive that care with the doctor or hospital of their choice, as there would be no more out-of-network care. a company would spend the same amount for healthcare on a low-wage employee and an executive, possibly leading to lost wages that disproportionately affects those with smaller paychecks
hope this helps u
What is the type of lighting that is used to the side of the object being
photographed to show details such as tool marks, textures, surface
irregularities, polished surfaces, vehicle accident damage and small
spaces?
Answer: Side lighting
Explanation:
Side lighting is a light that is placed at a 45-degree to an angle of an object to show the detail f tool marks, textures, surface irregularities, polished surfaces, vehicle accident damage and small spaces.
Who is responsible for law enforcement at the county level?
1. Police Captain
2. Sheriff
3. Federal Marshall
4. Attorney General
Answer:
federal marshall
Explanation:
because sheriff stays in the city
attorney is for court
police captain is the head of police
Remember my PROTEST from last night? let's keep it going. I am giving points to support my friends by asking ?s. Go to my profile to see my unanswered questions. giving BRAINLIEST to best answer on every question. What has 13 hearts, but does not have any organs? whoever gets it right and is my friend will get brainly. Friend request me on brainly and let me know on my questions.
Answer:
a deck of cards.
Explanation:
Which types of officers specialize in high-risk tasks such as tactical entry?
Undercover officers
Sheriffs
SWAT officers
Patrol officers
SWAT officers are the officers who specialize in high-risk tasks such as tactical entry.
What is a tactical entry?Tactical entry is a kind of making an entry into a planned building in high-risk situations with arms and ammunition.
In the US country, SWAT officers are a team of officials who enforce laws by using specialized equipment and tactical entries. SWAT stands for Special Weapons and Tactics.
Therefore, the officers who are engaged in high-risk tasks are the SWAT officers.
Learn more about the SWAT officers in the related link:
https://brainly.com/question/14665659
#SPJ1
.What did the Stolen Valor Act attempt to prohibit?
lying about military service
lying about crimes committed during service
lying about receiving a military medal of honor
lying about being honorably discharged from the military
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Hopefully this helps.
Answer: lying about military service
Explanation:
Why we have two different court systems
Answer:
The United States has two separate court systems, which are the federal and the state, because the U.S. Constitution created federalism. Federalism means the governmental powers are shared between the federal government and state governments, for this reason state laws cannot govern federal powers, like bankruptcy.
Explanation:
*Hope this helps*
what if people hurt other people and police just watch what dose that mean?
Answer:
they are bystantders and they should be fired
Explanation:
how do i send messages??? and read???
why is the continuous presence of police officers and vigilante members of the public an ineffective crime prevention strategy?
A. crime is too widely dispersed for a limited number of police officers and vigilantes
B. the public does not trust the police force
C. people rely on security cameras to capture criminals in action
D. crime generally occurs at night when most police officers are off duty
Answer:
A. crime is too widely dispersed for a limited number of police officers and vigilantes
Explanation:
I think it's A because we don't have much police officers that are always available to help others and they don't always come on time. So in conclusion this is a ineffective crime prevention strategy. -I hope this helped answer your question.
what typically occurs during arraignment
A criminal defendant is formally informed of the charges against him at an arraignment, where he may also be requested to enter a plea to the charges.
What do you mean by Arraignment?If the defendant is eligible, find out if they intend to use the public defender or hire an attorney.
The charges against the defendant will be formally read by the judge at the arraignment. Bail will be discussed during arraignment if it has not already been decided upon in the case. After being informed of their rights, the defendant will be asked to enter a plea to the charges.
Therefore, A criminal defendant is formally informed of the charges against him at an arraignment, where he may also be requested to enter a plea to the charges.
Learn more about Arraignment, here;
https://brainly.com/question/7535695
#SPJ6
Answer:
The plea bargain cut off date is set
Explanation:
Brainliest!! How has the American model of democracy affected the cause of civil rights around the world? (Please make an Introduction and a Conclusion)
Answer:
Explanation: The United States has a complex government system. One important tenet of this system is democracy, in which the ultimate power rests with the people. In the case of the United States, that power is exercised indirectly, through elected representatives. Although the U.S. has been a strong proponent of democracy, it did not invent democracy. The Greeks are often credited with pioneering a democratic government that went on to influence the structure of the United States. Read this article that describes how elements of ancient Greek democracy heavily influenced the figures that designed the United States government.
Answer:
Explanation: The United States has a complex government system. One important tenet of this system is democracy, in which the ultimate power rests with the people. In the case of the United States, that power is exercised indirectly, through elected representatives. Although the U.S. has been a strong proponent of democracy, it did not invent democracy. The Greeks are often credited with pioneering a democratic government that went on to influence the structure of the United States. Read this article that describes how elements of ancient Greek democracy heavily influenced the figures that designed the United States government.
Explanation:
Which of the following best describes chain of custody?
O The amount of time a criminal spends in custody
O The documentation of movement and location of physical evidence
O The documentation of a criminals reoccurring crimes
O Searching areas of criminal interest and seizing evidence
The documentation of movement and location of physical evidence best describes the chain of custody.
Chain of custody is a documentation procedure in which the details of the transfer of evidence is recorded. It includes the names of investigating officers, and forensic experts who received the physical evidence for examination and analysis so that the physical evidence can be utilized for the purpose of identification and conviction of the criminal. Physical evidence is any tangible evidence which can be related to the crime and can be useful for establishment of conviction of crime. The chain of custody is presented in the court of law and all the experts which are listed in the chain of custody are summon to give opinion about the physical evidence. Chain of custody is not the duration spend by the criminal in the judicial custody, it does not include information related to criminal activity, it does not include information related to searching of the areas where evidence has been found or evidence has been seized.Learn more about chain of custody:
https://brainly.com/question/17899853
Are you cool?
What type of pet do you have?
Separate layers of government where power is divided is also known as?(the United States is an example).
A trial has an opening statement and a
O closing statement
O reasoning statement
Opleading statement
ASAP!! Create a list of what you believe Human Rights Should Be
free medication for all
abortion should be the woman's choice, not yours
if people come to seek asylum, they should be offered a home and jobs, especially if they're willing to work and contribute to our country
How does Article III protect the political rights of judges? Of individuals?
Answer:
in our unique judicial system, courts are protected from the influence of other branches of government, as well as shifting popular opinion. ... This allows the judiciary to make decisions based on what is right under the law, without political or personal consequences.
Explanation:
The proper arm signal for slowing or stopping is
Answer:
put your hands up with your pome facing them
Explanation:
When tightening the lug nuts after attaching a spare tire, how can you make
sure the tire is properly aligned against the mounting surface behind it?
Answer:
A. in a clockwise pattern.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
What reasons can you give for excluding from jury service members of the
clergy, attorneys, physicians, police officers, and convicted felons? Should
everyone be required to serve on juries? Give your reasons.
Answer and Explanation:
To exclude these people from the jury, we could say that they can act with confidence to reach a conclusion about the crime and the accused. This causes all judgment to be impaired and incorrect results to be applied. However, I believe that only convicted criminals should be excluded from a jury. This is because a jury must be mandatorily composed of all American citizens as a way of participating in the country's citizenship and civil obligations. However, a convicted criminal does not have citizenship until he has served his sentence and is reintroduced into society.
The juries are the part of the judicial system which determines the conviction or the crime of the person guilty. Juries by seeing the evidence decide whether the person convicted is guilty or not.
Reasons for excluding service members are:
Clergy : They can be excluded from the jury as they are too sympathetic towards the convicts that question the efficacy of the judicial system.Convicted Felons : They have already been convicted and were a part of criminal activity before which makes their decision-making ability to be questionable.Their citizenship is also not permanent and to be a part of the jury they should be reintroduced into the society.
Only a few selected persons should serve in the jury according to their unbiased nature.
To learn more about jury members follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/1749622
in an urban environment, you are most likely to___
Hi extras who ever want to cosplay with me they can but i am bakugo
Answer:
who should i be??? idek
Explanation:
What is the first step of law enforcement after arriving at a crime scene?
Begin looking for potential evidence
Documenting the scene
O Making an initial walk through
O Securing the crime scene
nice guys always finish last?
Answer:
yeah...
Explanation:
its the hard truth. I should have known that gave you my heart but you messed around and broke that.
Davis, a well-known politician, is currently running campaign across the country. He needs private security personnel to stay close to him, escort him to and from places, travel with him, and conduct security checks on arriving at different locations. Which of these types of private security personnel may serve David’s requirements?
A.
a personal guard
B.
a security guard
C.
a private investigator
D.
a security contractor
Answer:
A personal guard.
Explanation: