The statement "As attendance at school decreases, achievement also decreases" exemplifies a negative correlation between attendance and achievement.
Correlation pertains to the association or connection between two variables. In this case, the variables are attendance at school and achievement. A negative correlation means that as one variable decreases, the other variable also decreases.
The statement suggests that as attendance at school drops, achievement also decreases. This implies that there is a negative relationship between attendance and achievement. When students attend school less frequently, their academic performance tends to decline.
Negative correlations are characterized by an inverse relationship between variables, where an increase in one variable corresponds to a decrease in the other. In this scenario, the negative correlation indicates that lower attendance is associated with lower achievement levels.
It is important to note that correlation does not imply causation, and there may be other factors influencing both attendance and achievement.
Learn more about correlation here:
brainly.com/question/32675871
#SPJ11
Jamal needs the order the four cards shown in increasing order .which would be the correct order of cards
Answer:
It's C, not D
Step-by-step explanation:
The solution is, Jamal needs the order the four cards shown in increasing order , D > A > B > C would be the correct order of cards.
option A.
What is number?A number is a mathematical object used to count, measure, and label. The original examples are the natural numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, and so forth. Numbers can be represented in language with number words.
here, we have,
given that,
Jamal needs the order the four cards shown in increasing order
we have,
A. -2/9 = -0.22
B. -.25 = - 0.25
C. -29% = -0.29
D. -1/5 = -0.2
we know that,
-0.2> -0.22> -0.25 > -0.29
so, the correct order of cards is:
D > A > B > C
Hence, The solution is, Jamal needs the order the four cards shown in increasing order , D > A > B > C would be the correct order of cards.
option A.
To learn more on number click:
brainly.com/question/17429689
#SPJ2
Let X be a standard normal random variable. Another random variable is determined as follows. We flip a fair coin (independent from X). In case of Heads, we let Y=X. In case of Tails, we let Y=−X.
Is Y normal? Justify your answer.
yes
no
not enough information to determine
Compute Cov(X,Y).
Cov(X,Y)=
Are X and Y independent?
yes
no
not enough information to determine
Problem 3. Problem 1(c)
Find P(X+Y≤0).
P(X+Y≤0)=
Based on these considerations, it can be concluded that Y is not a normal random variable.
The random variable Y, defined as Y = X if the coin flip is Heads and Y = -X if the coin flip is Tails, is not a normal distribution.
To justify this answer, we can consider that the normal distribution is symmetric around its mean. However, in this case, the transformation of Y = -X introduces asymmetry, as it reflects the distribution across the origin.
Additionally, the probability distribution of Y is a mixture of two normal distributions with equal weights, one centered at 0 and the other at 0 but with opposite signs. This combination results in a distribution that is not normal.
The random variable Y, which is defined as Y = X in case of a Heads coin flip and Y = -X in case of a Tails coin flip, is not a normal distribution. This can be justified by considering the properties of the normal distribution. The normal distribution is symmetric around its mean, but the transformation Y = -X introduces asymmetry by reflecting the distribution across the origin. As a result, the probability distribution of Y becomes a mixture of two normal distributions with equal weights, centered at 0 but with opposite signs. This combination of two distinct distributions results in a non-normal distribution for Y.
Therefore, based on these considerations, it can be concluded that Y is not a normal random variable.
To know more about normal distributions check the below link:
https://brainly.com/question/4079902
#SPJ4
Ben's dad is making a large pot of pasta sauce that calls for 3.5 kilograms of tomatoes. If he triples the amount of tomatoes for the recipe, how many grams of tomatoes will he use? Enter your answer in the box.
Answer: 10,500 gm
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
Pasta requires 3.5 kg of tomatoes
we know, [tex]1\ kg=1000\ mL[/tex]
If the amount is triples, the quantity of tomatoes is [tex]3\times 3.5=10.5\ kg[/tex]
[tex]\Rightarrow 10.5\ kg\equiv 10.5\times 1000=10,500\ gm[/tex]
Thus, he uses 10,500 gm of tomatoes
how do you add & subtract rational expressions
Answer:
To add or subtract two rational expressions with the same denominator, we simply add or subtract the numerators and write the result over the common denominator. When the denominators are not the same, we must manipulate them so that they become the same. In other words, we must find a common denominator.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
To add or subtract two rational expressions with the same denominator, we simply add or subtract the numerators and write the result over the common denominator. When the denominators are not the same, we must manipulate them so that they become the same.
Step-by-step explanation:
Find the area of the figure.
Step-by-step explanation:
Area of Rectangle at the top =
Length x Width
[tex] = 3.5 \times 3 \\ = 10.5 {mm}^{2} [/tex]
Area of Quarter- Circle = 1/4 x Area of Circle
[tex] = \frac{1}{4} \pi {r}^{2} \\ = \frac{1}{4} \pi( {3.5}^{2} ) \\ = 3 \frac{1}{16} \pi {mm}^{2} [/tex]
Area of Rectangle at the right = Length x Width
[tex] = 5.5 \times 3.5 \\ = 19.25 {mm}^{2} [/tex]
Total Area = Area of 2 Rectangles + Area of Quarter Circle
[tex] = 10.5 + 3 \frac{1}{16} \pi + 19.25 \\ = 29.75 + 3 \frac{1}{16}\pi \\ = 32 \frac{13}{16}\pi {mm}^{2} [/tex]
I will leave the answer in terms of pi as I'm not sure if you need to round off your answer.
What is the distance between the bakery (b) and the library (c)? Explain using coordinate subtraction
Answer:
The distance between the bakery and the library is the length of BC. The endpoints of this line segment are B(0, 4) and C(3, 4). Because the y-coordinates of both points are the same (4), the length of BC can be found by subtracting the smaller x-coordinate from the greater x-coordinate: BC = 3 - 0 = 3 units. The distance between the bakery and the library is 3 blocks.
Step-by-step explanation:
I did the activity, this is the sample answer.
Mr. Brown opened a new account with a deposit of $4,000.
- The account earned annual simple interest. - He did not make any additional deposits or withdrawals.
- At the end of 4 years, the balance was $4,400. What is the annual interest rate on this account? O 5%
O 2.5%
O 10%
O 7.5%
Pharoah Limited purchased a computer for $8,600 on January 1, 2020. Straight-line depreciation is used for the computer, based on a five-year life and a $900 residual value. In 2022, the estimates are revised. Pharoah now expects the computer will be used until December 31, 2023, when it can be sold for $700. Calculate the 2022 depreciation expense.
The depreciation expense for 2022, based on the purchase price for the computer of $8,600, the revised estimate in 2022, using the straight-line method is $2,410 per year
What is the straight line depreciation method?The straight-line depreciation method is method for calculating the depreciation of an asset in which the value of the asset is uniformly reduced within each period until the salvage value of asset is reached.
The depreciation on the computer = $8,600 - $900 = $7,700
The annual depreciation rate for the computer in the first two years, using the straight line depreciation method is; $7,700/5 = $1,540 per year
The depreciation of the computer by the end of 2021 = 2 × $1,540 = $3,080
Therefore, the net book value of the computer at the end of 2021 = $8,600 - $3,080 = $5520
The estimates are revised with Pharoah expecting to use the computer until December 2022, to sell for $700, therefore;
The revised depreciable amount for the computer = $5,520 - 700 = $4,820
The revised depreciation rate for the years, 2022 and 2023 is therefore;
Depreciation = $4,820/2 = $2,410 per year
The depreciation expense in 2022 = $2,410Learn more on straight line depreciation here: https://brainly.com/question/16200171
#SPJ4
Okay, so I need the one step equation for this question: Lee drove 420 miles and used 15 gallons of gasoline. How many miles did Lee's car travel per gallon of gasoline. I really need the one step equation version, as I know the number is 28. Please help me!
HELP I NEED HELP ASAP
HELP I NEED HELP ASAP
HELP I NEED HELP ASAP
HELP I NEED HELP ASAP
HELP I NEED HELP ASAP
HELP I NEED HELP ASAP
HELP I NEED HELP ASAP
HELP I NEED HELP ASAP
Answer:
the answer is no. D
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Oh, yes it is D
A Swedish study examined gingival bleeding in 164 pairs of same-sex twins of which one twin had low exposure to smoking, while the other had high exposure to smoking. The reasons for using this co-twin control design include pair matching for sex, age, and genetic factors, and that confounding factors such as oral hygiene and food habits are also likely to be matched within a pair. The aim of the study is to test whether smoking is associated with higher risk of gingivitis. The study found that in 40 pairs the low-exposed twin had gingivitis while the high-exposed twin did not, in 23 pairs the high-exposed twin had gingivitis while the low-exposed twin did not, while in the remaining 101 pairs the twins had same status: in 15 pairs both had gingivitis and in 86 pairs both did not have gingivitis.
a. Which type of study design applies to this study: paired or independent samples?
b. Write the 2×2 table cross-tabulating the pairs of exposed and unexposed twins in terms of their gingivitis status (yes/no).
c. The research hypothesis is that smoking is associated with gingivitis. For the statistical analysis, what are the null and alternative hypotheses?
d. Perform a statistical test for the null hypothesis, using hand calculations. Interpret your results
a. The study design that applies to this study is paired design.
b. The 2×2 table:
Gingivitis (+) Gingivitis (-)
--------------------------------------------------
Exposed (+) 23 40
Exposed (-) 15 86
c. For the statistical analysis, the null and alternative hypotheses are as follows:
Null hypothesis: Smoking is not associated with gingivitis
Alternative hypothesis: Smoking is associated with gingivitis
d. Under the null hypothesis, the χ² test statistic is less than the critical value. Therefore, we fail to reject the null hypothesis that smoking is not associated with gingivitis.
The calculated χ² value is greater than the critical value; thus, we reject the null hypothesis.
a. The study design that applies to this study is paired design because it involves pairs of same-sex twins, where one twin is low-exposed to smoking and the other twin is high-exposed to smoking. The pairs are matched based on sex, age, and genetic factors..
b. The 2×2 table that cross-tabulating the pairs of exposed and unexposed twins in terms of their gingivitis status is as follows:
Gingivitis (+) Gingivitis (-)
--------------------------------------------------
Exposed (+) 23 40
Exposed (-) 15 86
c. For the statistical analysis, the null and alternative hypotheses are as follows:
Null hypothesis: Smoking is not associated with gingivitis
Alternative hypothesis: Smoking is associated with gingivitis
d. Perform a statistical test for the null hypothesis using hand calculations
To test the null hypothesis, we will use the McNemar's test. The formula for McNemar's test is given below:
χ² = [(b - c)²]/(b + c)
where b is the number of discordant pairs, and c is the number of discordant pairs.
The calculations are: b = 23, c = 40χ² = [(23 - 40)²]/(23 + 40) = 6.25
The calculated χ² value is 6.25.
The degrees of freedom (df) for the McNemar's test is one less than the number of matched pairs. In this study, there were 164 pairs; thus, df = 163.
The critical value of χ² with df = 163 and α = 0.05 is 1.736.
Under the null hypothesis, the χ² test statistic is less than the critical value. Therefore, we fail to reject the null hypothesis that smoking is not associated with gingivitis.
The calculated χ² value is greater than the critical value; thus, we reject the null hypothesis. The results of the study suggest that there is an association between smoking and gingivitis.
To know more about McNemar's test, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/16875825#
#SPJ11
24 + 8x + 10(2x)
Terms:
Constants:
Coefficients:
2,900 Written in scientific notation
The number 2,900 in scientific notation is 2.9 * 10³
How to write the number in scientific notationFrom the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:
Number = 2,900
Multiply the number by 1
So, we have
Number = 2,900 * 1
Express 1 as 1000/1000
So, we have
Number = 2,900 * 1000/1000
Divide
Number = 2.9 * 1000
Express 1000 as 10³
So, we have
Number = 2.9 * 10³
Hence, the number in scientific notation is 2.9 * 10³
Read more about scientific notation at
https://brainly.com/question/1767229
#SPJ1
The school band has 8 alto saxophones and 2 baritone saxophones. What is the ratio of baritone saxophones to alto saxophones?
Answer:
4:1
Step-by-step explanation:
8/2 = 4:1 cause 2 can go into 8, 4 times.
another, these are tricky to me.
Answer:
It would be D ^^
Step-by-step explanation:
I learned this 2 years ago lol <3
Find the area of the shaded region.
Answer:
69.53 ft
Step-by-step explanation:
area of a box: 18*18 = 324
area of a circle: (pi)*9^2 = 254.47
324-254.47 = 69.53 ft
x - 36 = 205 what is it and
x + 127 = 300
74 = x 1,068
x - 47 = 47
Answer:
241
Step-by-step explanation:
205
+36
_____
241
X would be 241
Express the following in form, where p and q are integers and q≠ . (0.1282828) find the answer please and thank you
Answer: [tex]\dfrac{127}{990}[/tex].
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x=0.1282828...
Multiply 10 on both sides , we get
10 x = 1.282828... (i)
Now multiply 100 on both sides , we get
1000x=128.2828... (ii)
Eliminate (i) from (ii), we get
[tex]990x=127\\x=\dfrac{127}{990}[/tex]
Hence, the required [tex]\dfrac{p}{q}[/tex] form: [tex]\dfrac{127}{990}[/tex].
PLEASE ANSWER THIS ASAP
Answer:
Option D
is the correct....
Name the decimal and fraction for R on the number line.
Click the icon to view the number lines.
The decimal is 1.
The fraction is
A hotel purchased a new office desk on April 15, 2018 and new executive style chars for the office on August 5, 2018. The office desk cost $950, and the chairs cost $1,900.
Determine the total depreciation amount for 2020 assuming the taxpayer opted out of Sec. 179 and bonus (if available) in the your of purtase. In addition, assume all taxpayers use a calendar year tax period and that the property mentioned was the caly property purchased in the year of acquisition. Use the appropriate depreciation table from your note sheet textbook where necessary.
I. $547
II. $407
III.$498
IV. $478
V. None of the answers given here.
The total depreciation amount for 2020 is $547.
We need to know the depreciation method and the asset's useful life in order to calculate the total amount of depreciation for 2020. Let's suppose the assets are being depreciated using the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) and have a useful life of five years because the question leaves this information out. The desk for the workplace was bought on April 15, 2018. We must ascertain the number of full years the desk has been in operation as of December 31, 2020, to compute the year's depreciation. By the end of 2020, it would have been in use for three years after it was acquired in 2018.
Using MACRS, the depreciation percentages for the 5-year property are as follows:
Year 1: 20%
Year 2: 32%
Year 3: 19.20%
Year 4: 11.52%
Year 5: 11.52%
Year 6: 5.76% (if applicable)
Since we're calculating depreciation for the 3rd year, we'll use the Year 3 depreciation percentage of 19.20%.
Depreciation for the office desk in 2020:
Depreciation = Cost of the desk × Depreciation percentage
Depreciation = $950 × 19.20% = $182
The executive-style chairs were purchased on August 5, 2018. They would also have been in service for 3 full years by the end of 2020. Using the same depreciation percentages, the depreciation for the chairs in 2020 would be:
Depreciation = Cost of the chairs × Depreciation percentage
Depreciation = $1,900 × 19.20% = $364
Now, let's calculate the total depreciation amount for 2020 by adding the depreciation of the desk and chairs:
Total Depreciation = Depreciation of the desk + Depreciation of the chairs
Total Depreciation = $182 + $364 = $546
Given the answer choices provided, none of them match the calculated total depreciation amount of $546. However, the closest answer is an option I: $547.
The total depreciation amount for 2020 is $547.
To know more about depreciation, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/1203926
#SPJ4
Can someone please help me with math.
4- 20
I created an equation for this one:
4x+x=100
4x= four times the amount of the other numberx= the numbercombine like terms5x=100
divide by 5x=20
5. One pretzel costs $3
Create an equation:
2s+p=74s+3p=17Mulitply 2s+p=7 by -2 so you can use elimination.
-4s-2p=-144s+3p=17Combine equations
p=3
7(2x+3)-x(14-y)
[tex]7(2x + 3y) - x(14 - y)[/tex]
Answer:
[tex]y(x+21)[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
[tex]7(2x+3y)-x(14-y)\\=14x+21y-14x+xy\\= 21y+xy\\= y(x+21)[/tex]
Find the missing length
Answer:
15
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
15
Step-by-step explanation:
A² + B² = C²
9 • 9 = 81
12 • 12 = 144
81 + 144 = 225
Sqrt
√255 = 15
If 3/4 of a cup of a snack food gives you your daily value of calcium, then what fraction of your daily value of calcium is in 1 cup of the snack food? (Enter a fraction in the form A/B, where A and B are whole numbers. Do not include any words or calculations.)
The fraction of your daily value of calcium in 1 cup of the snack food is 4/3.
Given information:
If 3/4 fraction of a cup of a snack food gives you your daily value of calcium
To find:
what fraction of your daily value of calcium is in 1 cup of the snack food?
Solution:
If 3/4 of a cup of a snack food gives you your daily value of calcium, then 1/4 of a cup of a snack food would give you 1/3 of the daily value of calcium.
Now, 1 cup of the snack food would give you four times that amount of 1/3 of the daily value of calcium.
Thus, the fraction of daily value of calcium in 1 cup of the snack food would be 4 x 1/3= 4/3
Answer: Therefore, the fraction of your daily value of calcium in 1 cup of the snack food is 4/3.
Learn more about fraction here:
https://brainly.com/question/10354322
#SPJ11
Drag and drop each pair of lines to categorize them as either parallel, perpendicular, or neither.
The total weight of three kittens is 14 ounces kitten one weighs 1/4 pound kit in two weighs 5.5 ounces how many ounces does kitten three weigh?
Answer:
4.5 ounces
Step-by-step explanation:
Given data
Total weight=14 ounces
1st kitten= 1/4pound = 4 ounces
2nd kitten= 5.5 ounces
3rd kitten = x ounces
Let the expression for the total weight be
4+5.5+x=14
solve for x
9.5+x=14
x= 14-9.5
x=4.5 ounces
Hence the 3rd kitten weighs 4.5 ounces
The ratio of carrots to potatoes in a garden was 1:2. The ratio of potatoes to tomatoes was 1:3. If there are 45 carrots in the garden, how many tomatoes are in the garden?
Answer:
270 tomatoes
Step-by-step explanation:
Lets organize the Info
Carrots to Potatoes is 1:2
Potatoes to Tomatoes is 1:3
There are 45 Carrots
So lets input it in the ratio Carrots : Potatoes
45 : 2(45)
45 : 90
There are 90 Potatoes in the garden
Lets input that info to the ratio Potatoes : Tomatoes
90: 3(90)
90 : 270
Summarize:
There are :
45 carrots
90 potatoes
270 tomatoes
If my answer is incorrect, pls correct me!
If you like my answer and explanation, mark me as brainliest!
-Chetan K
Answer:
270 tomatoes
Step-by-step explanation:
Find: (6m^5 + 3 - m^3 - 4m) - (-m^5 + 2m^3 - 4m + 6)
Answer:
7m^5 - 3m^3 - 3
Step-by-step explanation:
What exponential has a value of 729?
Answer: There are infinitely many.
For example, 5314410.5 or 93. You are probably looking for (3)^6 tho