Arrange the following elements in order of decreasing ionic radius: 1 = largest ; 4 = smallest
Mg2+
F-
Cl-
K+
F-
Cl-
K+

The order of solubility in water for the compounds is: c. monoacylglycerol > b. diacylglycerol > a. triacylglycerol. Monoacylglycerol is the most soluble, followed by diacylglycerol, and then triacylglycerol.

The solubility of these acylglycerols in water is determined by their polar and nonpolar regions. Each of the compounds contains palmitic acid, which is a long hydrophobic hydrocarbon chain. However, they also have hydrophilic regions due to the presence of glycerol and ester linkages.

Monoacylglycerol has the highest solubility because it has one palmitic acid chain and more hydrophilic regions, making it more compatible with water. Diacylglycerol, having two palmitic acid chains, has a higher hydrophobic character but still maintains some solubility due to its hydrophilic regions.

Triacylglycerol, with three palmitic acid chains, has the least solubility because its nonpolar regions dominate, making it more hydrophobic and less likely to dissolve in water.

To know more about palmitic acid click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/9496796#

#SPJ11

To do this, we will use the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, which relates the pH, pKa, and the concentrations of the acid and its conjugate base.

The equation is: pH = pKa + log10([A-]/[HA])

Here, [A-] is the concentration of the conjugate base (CH3COO-) and [HA] is the concentration of the acid (CH3COOH).

First, we need to find the pKa of CH3COOH. The pKa of acetic acid (CH3COOH) is approximately 4.74. Now, plug in the given concentrations and pKa into the equation: pH = 4.74 + log10([0.15 M]/[0.10 M]) pH = 4.74 + log10(1.5) pH ≈ 4.74 + 0.18 pH ≈ 4.92

Therefore, the pH of the solution containing 0.10 M CH3COOH and 0.15 M CH3COO- is approximately 4.92.

Learn more about Concentrations at https://brainly.com/question/17206790

#SPJ11

Astatine, radon, lead, and bismuth is the increasing order of atomic radius.

Due to the inclusion of a second electron shell and electron shielding, atomic size grows as you descend a column. As you move right across a row, the size of the atoms gets smaller due to more protons.

The atomic numbers of the chemical elements are organised in ascending order. Periods are horizontal rows, while groups are vertical columns. Chemical characteristics of elements belonging to the same group are comparable. This is due to the fact that they both have the same valency and amount of outside electrons.

to know more about atomic radius here:

brainly.com/question/13607061

#SPJ1

The solubility product constant (Ksp) for barium phosphate ([tex]Ba_{3} (PO_{4} )2^{2}[/tex]) can be determined from the molar solubility using the following equation:

the solubility product constant for barium phosphate is 1.09×[tex]10^{-41}[/tex].

[tex]Ksp = [Ba^{2+} } ][PO42-]^2[/tex]

where [[tex]Ba^{2+}[/tex]] and [[tex]PO_{4}^{2-}[/tex]] are the molar concentrations of barium ions and phosphate ions, respectively, at equilibrium.

Since the stoichiometry of the compound is 1:2 (one barium ion combines with two phosphate ions), we can assume that [[tex]Ba^{2+}[/tex]] = x and

[[tex]PO_{4}^{2-}[/tex]] = 2x. Therefore,

[tex]Ksp = x(2x)^2 = 4x^3[/tex]

The molar solubility of barium phosphate is given as 6.61×[tex]10^{-7}[/tex] M, which represents the value of x. Substituting this value into the equation for Ksp, we get:

Ksp = [tex]4(6.61×10-7)^3[/tex] = 1.09×[tex]10^{-41}[/tex]

Therefore, the solubility product constant for barium phosphate is

1.09×[tex]10^{-41}[/tex].

Learn more about barium phosphate

https://brainly.com/question/29892467

#SPJ4

According to the VSEPR theory, each carbon atom in cubane should have a tetrahedral shape around it. The bond angle associated with this shape is 109.5 degrees. If we assume an ideal cubic shape for cubane, the actual bond angles around each carbon would be 90 degrees.

C)The ideal cubic shape would require all bond angles to be 90 degrees, but the tetrahedral shape around each carbon atom means that some of the bond angles are 109.5 degrees. This creates a strain in the molecule, making it unstable.

1. According to the VSEPR theory, what should be the shape around each carbon atom? What shape is associated with this bond angle?

Answer: In cubane, each carbon atom is bonded to one hydrogen atom and three other carbon atoms. According to the VSEPR theory, the electron groups around each carbon atom will arrange themselves to minimize electron repulsion. With four electron groups (one hydrogen and three carbons), the shape around each carbon atom should be tetrahedral. The bond angle associated with a tetrahedral shape is 109.5 degrees.

2. If you assume an ideal cubic shape, what are the actual bond angles around each carbon?

Answer: In an ideal cubic shape, the bond angles between the carbon atoms are equal to the angles between the edges of a cube. These angles can be calculated using the dot product between two adjacent edge vectors, which yields a bond angle of 90 degrees around each carbon atom.

3. Explain how your answers to questions 2a and 2b suggest why this molecule is so unstable.

Answer: The instability of cubane can be attributed to the difference between the ideal tetrahedral bond angle (109.5 degrees) predicted by VSEPR theory and the actual bond angle in the cubic shape (90 degrees). The smaller bond angle in cubane creates significant strain and repulsion between the electron groups around each carbon atom. This strain makes the molecule highly unstable and prone to explosive reactions, as demonstrated by the incidents mentioned in your question.

To know more about VSEPR Theory:

https://brainly.com/question/685890

#SPJ11

For a first-order reaction, the rate law is denoted as: Rate = k[A]; here k is known as the rate constant and [A] is called as the concentration of the reactant.

For a first-order reaction, the concentration of the reactant decreases exponentially with time:

[A] = [A]₀[tex]e^{-kt}[/tex]

where [A]₀ is the initial concentration of the reactant at t = 0.

The half-life ([tex]t_{1/2}[/tex]) of a first-order reaction is the time it takes for the concentration of the reactant to decrease to half its initial value. Therefore, at t = [tex]t_{1/2}[/tex], [A] = [A]₀/2.

Substituting [A] = [A]₀/2 and t =  [tex]t_{1/2}[/tex], into the equation for a first-order reaction gives:

[A]₀/2 = [A]₀[tex]e^{-k*t_{1/2} }[/tex]

Simplifying the above equation, we get:

1/2 = [tex]e^{-k*t_{1/2} }[/tex]

The next step is taking the natural logarithm (㏑):

㏑(1/2) = -k* [tex]t_{1/2}[/tex]

Simplifying further, we get:

[tex]t_{1/2}[/tex] = (㏑2)/k

Therefore, the expression that relates the rate constant to the half-life  for a first-order reaction is:

k = (㏑ 2)/ [tex]t_{1/2}[/tex]

This equation shows that the rate constant is inversely proportional to the half-life of the reaction, meaning that a shorter half-life corresponds to a faster rate of reaction (larger value of k).

Learn more about half-life here:

https://brainly.com/question/24710827

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

The ideal gas law is given by:

PV = nRT

where P is the pressure, V is the volume, n is the number of moles of gas, R is the universal gas constant, and T is the temperature.

Rearranging the equation to solve for n, we get:

n = PV / RT

where:

P = 120 kPa

V = 32.4 L

R = 8.31 J/mol·K (universal gas constant)

T = 25°C + 273.15 = 298.15 K (temperature in kelvins)

Substituting the values:

n = (120 kPa * 32.4 L) / (8.31 J/mol·K * 298.15 K)

n = 1.34 mol (rounded to two significant figures)

Therefore, there are approximately 1.34 moles of He gas present in the given conditions.

The bond dissociation energy for the breaking of all the bonds in a mole of methane is: 2,190 kJ/mol.

To calculate the bond dissociation energy for the breaking of all the bonds in a mole of methane, [tex]CH^4[/tex], we first need to identify the individual bond energies of each bond in the molecule. Using the provided values, we have:
- C-H bond energy = 410 kJ/mol
- C-C bond energy = 350 kJ/mol
- C=C bond energy = 611 kJ/mol
- C-O bond energy = 350 kJ/mol
- C=O bond energy = 799 kJ/mol
- O-O bond energy = 180 kJ/mol
- O=O bond energy = 498 kJ/mol
- H-O bond energy = 460 kJ/mol

Since methane has four C-H bonds, we will need to multiply the bond energy of C-H by four to get the total bond dissociation energy for all of the C-H bonds. Similarly, we will need to multiply the bond energy of C-C by one, C-O by zero, and C=O by zero since there are no such bonds in methane.

Thus, the total bond dissociation energy for a mole of methane would be:
4 x C-H bond energy + 1 x C-C bond energy + 0 x C-O bond energy + 0 x C=O bond energy
= 4(410 kJ/mol) + 1(350 kJ/mol) + 0(350 kJ/mol) + 0(799 kJ/mol)
= 1,840 kJ/mol + 350 kJ/mol
= 2,190 kJ/mol

To know more about "Bond dissociation energy" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30762022#

#SPJ11

The percent composition of chlorine in zinc chloride is approximately 52.01%.

1: The molar mass of zinc (Zn) is 65.38 g/mol, and the molar mass of chlorine (Cl) is 35.45 g/mol. Since there are two chlorine atoms in ZnCl₂, the molar mass of ZnCl₂ is 65.38 + (2 * 35.45) = 136.28 g/mol.

2: Calculate the mass of chlorine in the zinc chloride by subtracting the initial mass of zinc from the final mass of zinc chloride: 3.956 g (ZnCl₂) - 1.898 g (Zn) = 2.058 g (Cl₂).

3: Calculate the percent composition of chlorine in zinc chloride by dividing the mass of chlorine (Cl₂) by the mass of zinc chloride (ZnCl₂), and then multiply by 100%: (2.058 g (Cl₂) / 3.956 g (ZnCl₂)) * 100% = 52.01%.

Learn more about percent composition here:

https://brainly.com/question/20393858

#SPJ11

The best option would be an acid component with a value of 3.00.

Buffer Solution is a water-based solvent-based solution composed of a weak acid and its conjugate base, or a weak base and its conjugate acid. They are resistant to pH changes caused by dilution or the addition of small amounts of acid/alkali to them.

To make a buffer with a pH of 3.00, the acid component must have a pKa near 3.00. The pK_a value is the inverse of the acid dissociation constant, (K_a)

We can calculate each acid's pK_a by taking the negative logarithm of its Ka value

pK_a = -log(K_a)

1. K_a = 9.10x10^{-6}

pK_a = -log(9.10x10^{-6}) = 5.04

2. K_a = 1.00x10^{3}

pK_a = -log(1.00x10^{3}) = -3

3. K_a = 3.00

pK_a = -log(3.00) = 0.52

4.K_a = 9.10x10^{4}

pK_a = -log(9.10x10^{4}) = -4.04

5. K_a = 1.0x10^{-4}

pK_a = -log(1.0x10^{-4}) = 4

6. K_a = 1.0x10^{-10}

pK_a = -log(1.0x10^{-10}) = 10

The acid component with the closest pK_a to 3.00 has a Ka of 3.00.

To know more about the buffer solution visit:

https://brainly.com/question/8676275

#SPJ1

The I−P−I bond angle is 180° and

Based on the molecular formula PI₃Br₂, we can deduce that this molecule has a trigonal bipyramidal molecular geometry. In this geometry, the terms you mentioned, I−P−I bond angle and Br−P−Br bond angle, can be determined as follows:

1. I−P−I bond angle: In a trigonal bipyramidal geometry, the bond angle between the axial positions is 180°. Since Iodine atoms are located at the axial positions, the I−P−I bond angle is 180°.

2. Br−P−Br bond angle: In the same trigonal bipyramidal geometry, the bond angle between the equatorial positions is 120°. As the Bromine atoms are located at the equatorial positions, the Br−P−Br bond angle is 120°.

So, the I−P−I bond angle is 180°, and the Br−P−Br bond angle is 120°.

To know more about bonds click on below link :

https://brainly.com/question/13941285

#SPJ11

103,000lbs/day of alum need (Al₂(SO₄)³·14 H₂O) are required for a 45 MGD water treatment plant that requires an optimum dosage of 25 ppm Al³⁺ for coagulation.

If the optimum dosage for coagulation is 25 ppm Al³⁺ and the water treatment plant has a flow rate of 45 MGD (million gallons per day), we can calculate the amount of alum required per day as follows:
25 ppm Al³⁺ x 45 MGD = 1,125 pounds of Al₂(SO₄)³·14 H₂O per day
However, the molecular weight of Al₂(SO₄)³·14 H₂O is 594.1 g/mol, which means that 1 mole of Al₂(SO₄)³·14 H₂O weighs 594.1 grams. Therefore, we need to convert pounds to grams by multiplying by a conversion factor of 453.592 grams per pound:
1,125 pounds/day x 453.592 grams/pound = 510,837 grams/day
Finally, we can convert grams to pounds per day by dividing by 453.592 grams per pound:
510,837 grams/day ÷ 453.592 grams/pound = 1,126.4 pounds/day (rounded to the nearest tenth)
Therefore, approximately 1,126.4 pounds per day of alum (Al₂(SO₄)³·14 H₂O) are required for a 45 MGD water treatment plant that requires an optimum dosage of 25 ppm Al³⁺ for coagulation. Rounded to the nearest thousandth, this is approximately 103,000 pounds per day.

Learn more about coagulation here

https://brainly.com/question/13231640

#SPJ11

We must apply the Nernst equation, which connects a battery's voltage to the concentration of the ions participating in the process, to answer this problem. The Nernst equation reads as follows: E = E° - (RT/nF)ln(Q)

Car battery voltage can vary from 12.6 to 14.4, as we can see when we check more closely. The car battery's voltage will be 12.6 volts when the engine is off and fully charged. As "resting voltage," this is understood.

Part A: The appropriate half-reactions are:  Mg → Mg2+ + 2e- (oxidation)

Cu₂₊ + 2e- → Cu (reduction)

The standard electrode potentials are: E°(Mg2+/Mg) = -2.37 V,

E°(Cu₂+/Cu) = +0.34 V

The reaction quotient at equilibrium is:

Q = [Mg₂₊]/[Cu₂₊] = (1.0×10⁻⁴)/(1.4) = 7.14×10⁻⁵

With these values entered into the Nernst equation, we obtain:

E = 0.34 - (8.31×298)/(2×96485)ln(7.14×10⁻⁵) - (-2.37)

E = 1.10 V

As a result, the battery's initial voltage is 1.10 V.

Part B: We must use the equation to get the battery's voltage after supplying 4.7 A for 8.0 hours.

E = E° - (RT/nF)ln(Q) - (IΔt/nF)

We must first determine how many moles of electrons were exchanged during the reaction:

n = 2 (from the balanced equation)

At the new concentration, the reaction quotient is:

Q' = ([Mg₂₊] - Δ[Mg₂₊])/([Cu₂₊] + Δ[Cu₂₊])

= (1.0×10⁻⁴ - 2nMg)/(1.4 + 2nCu)

= (1.0×10⁻⁴ - 2(4.7)(8×3600))/(1.4 + 2(4.7)(8×3600))

= 3.64×10⁻⁵

where Δ[Mg₂₊] = 2nMg and Δ[Cu₂₊] = -2nCu.

With these values entered into the Nernst equation, we obtain:

E = 0.34 - (8.31×298)/(2×96485)ln(3.64×10⁻⁵) - (-2.37) - (4.7×8×3600)/(2×96485)

E = 1.07 V

As a result, the battery's voltage is 1.07 V after providing 4.7 A for 8.0 hours.

Part C: When [Mg₂₊] = 0, the reaction will come to an end. We may use the following equation to determine how long it will take for this to occur:

Q = [Mg₂₊]

To know more about concentration visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/29276511

#SPJ1

In experiment cyclohexene is prepared by the phosphoric acid catalyzed dehydration of cyclohexanol:

1) The mechanism for the phosphoric acid catalyzed dehydration of cyclohexanol involves protonation of the hydroxyl group by the acid, followed by loss of a water molecule to form a carbocation intermediate. The carbocation then undergoes a deprotonation step to form the final product, cyclohexene. The reverse reaction follows the same mechanism in the opposite direction.

2) The rate of acid catalyzed dehydration of 1-methylcyclohexanol would be slower than for cyclohexanol. This is because the methyl group on the cyclohexanol molecule creates steric hindrance, making it more difficult for the molecule to undergo the necessary conformational changes to reach the transition state required for the dehydration reaction. This results in a higher activation energy and a slower reaction rate.

3) The equilibrium strongly favors the reverse reaction, hydration of the alkene, because the addition of water to the double bond forms a more stable product. This is due to the fact that the double bond in the alkene has a higher energy than the single bond in the alcohol, making the alcohol more stable overall.

Additionally, the presence of excess water in the reaction mixture shifts the equilibrium towards the hydrated product, further favoring the reverse reaction.

To know more about acid catalyzed dehydration :

https://brainly.com/question/14776128

#SPJ11

To determine the number of platinum atoms needed to span 7.706 mm, we first need to convert the radius of a platinum atom from picometers (pm) to millimeters (mm).  139 pm = 0.000139 mm

Then, we can calculate how many platinum atoms would be needed:
7.706 mm / 0.000139 mm per platinum atom = 55,432 platinum atoms
Therefore, 55,432 platinum atoms would have to be laid side by side to span a distance of 7.706 mm.
2. To determine the number of lead atoms in 210 milligrams of lead, we first need to convert the mass of a single lead atom from grams to milligrams:
3.44×10-22 grams = 3.44×10-19 milligrams
Then, we can calculate how many lead atoms there are in 210 milligrams of lead:
210 milligrams / 3.44×10-19 milligrams per lead atom = 6.10×1021 lead atoms
Therefore, there are 6.10×1021 lead atoms in 210 milligrams of lead.
3. To determine the volume of a barium atom in microliters, we first need to convert the volume of a single barium atom from cubic centimeters (cm3) to microliters (μL):
4.29×10-23 cm3 = 4.29×10-14 μL
Therefore, the volume of a barium atom is 4.29×10-14 μL.

To determine how many platinum atoms would have to be laid side by side to span a distance of 7.706 mm, first convert the given distance to picometers (1 mm = 1,000,000 pm):
7.706 mm * 1,000,000 pm/mm = 7,706,000 pm.
Next, divide the total distance in picometers by the radius of a single platinum atom (139 pm):
7,706,000 pm / 139 pm/platinum atom = 55,438.85 platinum atoms.
Since you can't have a fraction of an atom, round up to the nearest whole number:
55,439 platinum atoms.
2. To find how many lead atoms would be in 210 milligrams of lead, first convert the mass to grams (1 mg = 0.001 g):
210 mg * 0.001 g/mg = 0.21 g.
Next, divide the total mass in grams by the mass of a single lead atom (3.44 x 10^-22 g):
0.21 g / (3.44 x 10^-22 g/lead atom) = 6.1046511628 x 10^21 lead atoms.
3. To convert the volume of a barium atom from cm^3 to microliters, use the conversion factor (1 cm^3 = 1,000 µL):
4.29 x 10^-23 cm^3/barium atom * 1,000 µL/cm^3 = 4.29 x 10^-20 µL/barium atom.
So, the volume of a barium atom in microliters is 4.29 x 10^-20 µL.

Visit here to learn more about platinum atoms:

brainly.com/question/11172063

#SPJ11

The mass of hydrogen gas is 0.278g

We can use stoichiometry to determine the mass of hydrogen gas produced from the given amounts of aluminum and sodium hydroxide:

Balanced chemical equation for the reaction:

2 Al(s) + 2 NaOH(aq) + 6 H2O(l) → 2 NaAl(OH)4(aq) + 3 H2(g)

Number of moles of aluminum and sodium hydroxide:

n(Al) = m(Al) / M(Al) = 2.48 g / 26.98 g/mol = 0.092 mol

n(NaOH) = m(NaOH) / M(NaOH) = 4.75 g / 40.00 g/mol = 0.119 mol

The limiting reactant is aluminum.

The number of moles of hydrogen gas produced:

n(H2) = 3/2 * n(Al) = 3/2 * 0.092 mol = 0.138 mol

The mass of hydrogen gas produced:

m(H2) = n(H2) * M(H2) = 0.138 mol * 2.016 g/mol = 0.278 g

Therefore, the mass of hydrogen gas produced from the given amounts of aluminum and sodium hydroxide is 0.278 g.

learn more about stoichiometry,

https://brainly.com/question/14935523

#SPJ11

The ratio of the square roots of their molar masses is approximately 0.66. This means that NH3 molecules effuse about 1.5 times faster than CO molecules.

According to Graham's Law of Effusion, the rate of effusion of a gas is inversely proportional to the square root of its molar mass. The molar mass of NH3 is approximately 17 g/mol, while the molar mass of CO is approximately 28 g/mol. Therefore, the ratio of the square roots of their molar masses is approximately 0.66. This means that NH3 molecules effuse about 1.5 times faster than CO molecules.
Ammonia (NH3) molecules effuse faster than carbon monoxide (CO) molecules due to their lower molecular mass. To determine the rate, we can use Graham's Law of Effusion:
Rate₁ / Rate₂ = √(M₂ / M₁)
In this case, Rate₁ refers to the effusion rate of NH3, and Rate₂ refers to the effusion rate of CO. M₁ and M₂ are their respective molecular masses.
The molecular mass of NH3 is 14 (nitrogen) + 3(1) (hydrogen) = 17 g/mol, and the molecular mass of CO is 12 (carbon) + 16 (oxygen) = 28 g/mol.
Plugging these values into the equation:
Rate_NH3 / Rate_CO = √(28 / 17)
Rate_NH3 / Rate_CO ≈ 1.63
This means that ammonia (NH3) molecules effuse approximately 1.63 times faster than carbon monoxide (CO) molecules.

To learn more about molar masses, click here:

brainly.com/question/22997914

#SPJ11

The physical appearance of an aqueous tea solution and an organic solution can vary greatly. Aqueous tea solutions are typically dark in color, ranging from light amber to deep brown.

Organic solutions, on the other hand, can have a range of colors depending on the specific organic material being dissolved. However, in general, they are less likely to be as dark as a tea solution due to the absence of tannins.

Aqueous tea solution: This is a water-based solution, where tea leaves are steeped in hot water. The hot water extracts the tannins and polyphenolic compounds from the leaves, resulting in a dark-colored liquid. The intensity of the color can vary depending on the type of tea and the steeping time. Organic solution: An organic solution typically refers to a liquid containing organic (carbon-based) solvents or compounds.

In summary, the dark color of an aqueous tea solution is mainly due to the extraction of tannins and polyphenolic compounds from tea leaves when steeped in hot water.

To learn more about physical appearance:- https://brainly.com/question/31478047

#SPJ11

The strongest acid among the given compounds is b. [tex]BrCH_{2}OH[/tex] (bromomethanol).

This is because it has a halogen (bromine) attached to a carbon that is attached to a hydroxyl group (-OH).

The electronegativity of the halogen pulls electron density away from the hydroxyl group, making it more acidic.

The other compounds do not have this electronegativity difference and therefore do not exhibit strong acidity.

To know more about halogen, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/11156152#

#SPJ11

Therefore, the dry H2 would occupy 210.8 mL at 0 °C and 1 atm pressure. The closest answer choice is (a) 211 mL.

To solve this problem, we can use the combined gas law equation:

(P1V1/T1) = (P2V2/T2)

Where P1V1/T1 is the initial condition (sample collected over H2O at 23 °C and a pressure of 732 mm Hg), and P2V2/T2 is the final condition (dry H2 at 0 °C and 1 atm pressure).

First, we need to convert the initial pressure to total pressure by adding the vapor pressure of H2O at 23 °C:

P total = P(H2) + P(H2O) = 732 mmHg + 21 mmHg = 753 mmHg

Now we can plug in the values:

(P1V1/T1) = (P2V2/T2)

(753 mmHg)(245 mL)/(296 K) = (1 atm)(V2)/(273 K)

Solving for V2:

V2 = (753 mmHg)(245 mL)(273 K)/(1 atm)(296 K)

V2 = 210.8 mL

Therefore, the dry H2 would occupy 210.8 mL at 0 °C and 1 atm pressure. The closest answer choice is (a) 211 mL.

Know more about Gas law equation:

https://brainly.com/question/3637553

#SPJ11

The pH when 3.9 g of sodium acetate, NaC₂H₃O₂, is dissolved in 300.0 mL of water is 3.94.

To find the pH when 3.9 g of sodium acetate, NaC₂H₃O₂, is dissolved in 300.0 mL of water, we need to first find the concentration of the acetate ion, C₂H₃O₂⁻.

First, find the moles of sodium acetate.
molar mass of NaC₂H₃O₂ = 82.03 g/mol

moles of NaC₂H₃O₂ = 3.9 g / 82.03 g/mol

= 0.0475 mol

Find the concentration of acetate ion.

volume of solution = 300.0 mL = 0.3 L

concentration of acetate ion = moles of NaC₂H₃O₂ / volume of solution

= 0.0475 mol / 0.3 L

= 0.158 M

Use the Ka of acetic acid, NaC₂H₃O₂, to find the pH.

Ka = 1.8×10⁻⁵

pKa = -log(Ka) = -log(1.8×10⁻⁵) = 4.74 (rounded to 2 decimal places)

pH = pKa + log([C₂H₃O₂⁻]/[NaC₂H₃O₂])

= 4.74 + log(0.158/1)

= 4.74 + (-0.80)

= 3.94 (rounded to 2 decimal places)

Therefore, the pH when 3.9 g of sodium acetate is dissolved in 300.0 mL of water is approximately 3.94.

Learn more about pH: https://brainly.com/question/5219570

#SPJ11

The name zinc(II) chloride is correct, and the compound should not be renamed.

The compound zinc(II) chloride is incorrect because it does not properly reflect the actual chemical composition of the compound.

In this compound, zinc is present in its 2+ oxidation state, which means it has lost two electrons to become a cation. Chloride is present in its anionic form, having gained one electron to become a chloride ion.

According to the naming convention for ionic compounds, the cation's name is written first, followed by the anion's name, with the suffix ""-ide"" replacing the ending of the anion name. However, since zinc can form cations with different charges, the charge of the cation is indicated using Roman numerals in parentheses after the metal name.

Therefore, the correct name of this compound should be zinc(II) chloride, indicating that the zinc ion is in the +2 oxidation state.

If the compound actually had two chloride ions for each zinc ion, it would be correctly named zinc chloride, without the need for Roman numerals since zinc only has one possible oxidation state in this case.

In summary, the name zinc(II) chloride is correct, and the compound should not be renamed.

Click the below link, to learn more about Nomenclature of compounds:

https://brainly.com/question/25845195

#SPJ11

A diprotic acid has two acidic hydrogen atoms, meaning it can donate two protons. The pKa values given tell us the strength of each acidic hydrogen atom.

The pH of a 0.10 M solution of this diprotic acid that has been one quarter neutralized means that 25% of the acid has been converted to its conjugate base. This means that one of the two acidic hydrogen atoms has been neutralized, leaving only one left to donate.

We can use the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation to solve for the pH:

pH = pKa2 + log([A-]/[HA])

We know pKa2 is 6.50 and that one quarter of the acid has been neutralized, which means that [A-]/[HA] is 0.25. We can solve for [HA] by subtracting 0.25 from 1 and multiplying by the initial concentration of 0.10 M:

[HA] = (1-0.25) x 0.10 M = 0.075 M

Now we can plug in the values and solve for pH:

pH = 6.50 + log(0.25/0.075) = 5.41

Therefore, the pH of a 0.10 M solution of this diprotic acid that has been one quarter neutralized is 5.41.

To know more about Henderson-Hasselbalch equation:

https://brainly.com/question/13423434

#SPJ11

a) To calculate the time required for the deposition of 0.387g of Tl3+ as Tl(s) on a cathode, we need to use Faraday's law of electrolysis, which states that the amount of substance deposited is directly proportional to the amount of charge passed through the electrolytic cell.

The equation for the reduction of Tl3+ to Tl is:

Tl3+ + 3e- -> Tl(s)

The number of moles of Tl3+ required for the deposition of 0.387g can be calculated as follows:

n(Tl3+) = m/M = 0.387g / (204.38 g/mol) = 0.001893 mol

The number of coulombs of charge required for the reduction of 0.001893 mol of Tl3+ can be calculated using Faraday's constant (F):

Q = n(F) = 0.001893 mol x (3 F/mol) = 0.005679 C

The time required for the deposition of 0.005679 C of charge at a constant current of 0.831A can be calculated using the formula:

t = Q/I = 0.005679 C / 0.831A = 6.83 seconds

Therefore, it would take approximately 6.83 seconds for a constant current of 0.831A to deposit 0.387g of Tl3+ as Tl(s) on a cathode.

b) To calculate the mass of Tl2O3(s) that can be deposited on an anode at a constant current of 0.831A over the same amount of time as calculated previously, we need to use the oxidation half-reaction for the formation of Tl2O3:

4 Tl(s) + 3 O2(g) -> 2 Tl2O3(s)

The number of moles of Tl2O3 that can be formed can be calculated as follows:

n(Tl2O3) = (n(Tl) / 4) = (Q / (4 F)) = (0.005679 C / (4 F)) = 0.000432 mol

The mass of Tl2O3 can then be calculated using its molar mass:

m(Tl2O3) = n(Tl2O3) x M(Tl2O3) = 0.000432 mol x (457.39 g/mol) = 0.197 g

Therefore, the mass of Tl2O3 that can be deposited on an anode at a constant current of 0.831A over the same amount of time as calculated previously is approximately 0.197 g.

*IG:whis.sama_ent*

No, the proposed Lewis structure for BeH2 (H---Be----H) is not reasonable. The reason is that the total number of valence electrons is not correctly distributed.

In a reasonable Lewis structure, each atom should achieve a stable electron configuration by sharing or transferring valence electrons. Beryllium (Be) has 2 valence electrons, and each hydrogen atom (H) has 1 valence electron. Therefore, BeH2 has a total of 4 valence electrons.

A reasonable Lewis structure for BeH2 would be:

H-Be-H

In this structure, beryllium shares its 2 valence electrons with the 2 hydrogen atoms. Each hydrogen atom achieves a stable electron configuration with 2 electrons, and beryllium also achieves a stable electron configuration with 4 electrons.

Learn more about Hybridisation here: brainly.com/question/20300458

#SPJ11

The correct answer is (d) the valence shell is full of electrons.

This is because an atom with a full valence shell has no need to gain or lose electrons to form bonds with other atoms. The valence shell is the outermost shell of an atom and it determines the atom's reactivity and ability to bond with other atoms. If the valence shell is full, the atom is stable and does not need to form any additional bonds. However, if the valence shell is not full, the atom will tend to form chemical bonds with other atoms to fill its valence shell and achieve stability.

https://brainly.com/question/2431163

#SPJ11

The correct answer is (d) the valence shell is full of electrons.

This is because an atom with a full valence shell has no need to gain or lose electrons to form bonds with other atoms. The valence shell is the outermost shell of an atom and it determines the atom's reactivity and ability to bond with other atoms. If the valence shell is full, the atom is stable and does not need to form any additional bonds. However, if the valence shell is not full, the atom will tend to form chemical bonds with other atoms to fill its valence shell and achieve stability.

https://brainly.com/question/2431163

#SPJ11

The total number of products, including stereoisomers, formed in this reaction would be 2 products (from the addition of bromine at either the 2-position or the 4-position) multiplied by 4 stereoisomers for each product, resulting in a total of 8 products, including stereoisomers.

When (R)-2,4-dimethylhex-2-ene is treated with HBr in the presence of peroxides, it undergoes a radical bromination reaction, resulting in the addition of a bromine atom to one of the carbon atoms in the double bond. The addition can occur at either the 2-position or the 4-position of the double bond, resulting in two possible products.

Additionally, since the molecule has two chiral centers, there are four possible stereoisomers for each product, depending on the configuration of the bromine atom and the two methyl groups attached to the stereocenters.

To learn more about HBr https://brainly.com/question/31322888

#SPJ11

To determine the moles of benzyl alcohol used in the experiment, we need to first calculate the molar mass of benzyl alcohol:

Molar mass of benzyl alcohol = (12.0 g/mol x 7) + (1.00 g/mol x 8) + (16.0 g/mol x 1)
= 98.14 g/mol

Next, we can use the given reactant mass and molar mass to calculate the moles of benzyl alcohol used:

Moles of benzyl alcohol used = reactant mass / molar mass
= 21.2 g / 98.14 g/mol
= 0.2160 mol

Rounding to four significant figures, the moles of benzyl alcohol used in the experiment is 0.2160 mol.
To determine the moles of benzyl alcohol (C7H8O) used in the experiment, we need to first find the molar mass of benzyl alcohol and then use the reactant mass to calculate the moles.

The molar mass of benzyl alcohol is calculated as follows:
C: 7 atoms × 12.0 g/mol = 84.0 g/mol
H: 8 atoms × 1.00 g/mol = 8.00 g/mol
O: 1 atom × 16.0 g/mol = 16.0 g/mol

Adding these values together, we get the molar mass of benzyl alcohol:
84.0 g/mol + 8.00 g/mol + 16.0 g/mol = 108.0 g/mol

Now, we can use the reactant mass and molar mass to calculate the moles of benzyl alcohol used in the experiment:
Moles = (Reactant mass) / (Molar mass)
Moles = (21.2 g) / (108.0 g/mol)

Moles of benzyl alcohol used = 0.1963 mol (rounded to four significant figures)

Visit here to learn more about benzyl alcohol brainly.com/question/4555466

#SPJ11

The concentration in ppm of a pollutant that has been measured at 425 mg per 170 kg of sample is 2500 ppm.

To calculate the concentration in parts per million (ppm) of a pollutant that has been measured at 425 mg per 170 kg of the sample, we need to convert the mass of the pollutant to a concentration in ppm.

First, we need to convert the mass from milligrams to kilograms:
425 mg = 0.425 kg

Next, we can use the formula for concentration in ppm:
Concentration (ppm) = (mass of pollutant/mass of sample) x 10^6

Plugging in the values we have:
Concentration (ppm) = (0.425 kg / 170 kg) x 10^6
Concentration (ppm) = 2500 ppm

Therefore, the concentration of the pollutant is 2500 ppm.

Learn more about concentration: https://brainly.com/question/30899262

#SPJ11

sp/sp orbital overlap occur in cumulene.

Hydrogen uses an s orbital for bonding.

carbon atoms adjacent to the hydrogen atoms use sp2 hybrid orbitals for bonding

In organic chemistry, a cumulene is a compound having three or more cumulative (consecutive) double bonds. They are analogous to allenes, only having a more extensive chain.

In cumulene, the types of orbital overlaps that occur are:
1. sp/sp overlap: This occurs between the carbon atoms with linear geometry.
2. sp2/sp2 overlap: This occurs between the carbon atoms with trigonal planar geometry.
3. p/p overlap: This occurs between the p orbitals of carbon atoms, forming pi bonds.
Hydrogen uses an s orbital for bonding.
In cumulene, the carbon atoms adjacent to the hydrogen atoms use sp2 hybrid orbitals for bonding with hydrogen and other carbon atoms.

To learn more about cumulene https://brainly.com/question/2114590

#SPJ11