Alma Tirtsche (1921)
Alma Tirtsche's beaten body was found wrapped in a blanket in what is known as Gun
Alley in Melbourne, Australia. Because the body was relatively free of blood, the police
deduced that she had been murdered elsewhere and brought to the alley. Ger body had
been washed before being wrapped in the blanket. A local bar owner, Colin Ross, was
questioned. Ross admitted seeing Tirtsche in his bar earlier in the day.
Investigators collected blankets from Ross's home and found several strands of long,
reddish blonde hair on them. The length of the hair implied it had come from a female,
and the concentration of pigment in the hair implied a younger woman. Some of the
ends of the hair were irregular, implying the hair had been forcibly broken off. The
physical similarity of the hair found on the blanket with that of Alma Tirtschke convinced
the jury that Ross was the murderer. This was the first time that hair was used to secure
a conviction in Australia. Unfortunately, analysis of the hairs 75 years later showed that
two of the strands found on the blankets came from different individuals, which throws
doubt on Ross's guilt.
3. What other characteristics of the hair could the investigators have examined
(besides the length and color) to determine if they had come from the same
person, and that that person was Tirtsche?

Answer:

Policies are reapplied every 90 min, and preferences are a settings template to change the minimum password length policy in the Default Domain Policy group policy preference (GPO).

Explanation:

The newest member of the Group Policy family is Group Policy Preferences. Newness also brings with it some mysteries. Preferences are a settings template for changing the password strength length guideline in the Default Domain Policy group policy preference (GPO). Policies are updated every 90 minutes.

Group Policy Preferences is a group of client-side extensions for Group Policy that distribute preference settings to domain-joined machines running the desktop and server editions of Microsoft Windows. Administrative configuration options are sent to servers and workstations as preference settings.

Users have the option to change the administrative configuration, which distinguishes preference settings from policy settings. Administrative enforcement of policy settings limits user choice.

Domain-joined machines receive Group Policy Preferences via Group Policy. A domain-joined PC running Windows can get opaque configuration data because of Group Policy's adaptability.

Learn more about Group Policy Preferences, from:

brainly.com/question/27960381

#SPJ5

Answer:

Explanation:

Erin is a system administrator for a federal government agency.What law contains guidance on how she may operate a federalinformation system? a) Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) b) Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) c) Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) d) Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Actb) Federal Information SecurityManagement Act (FISMA

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Order of Presidential Succession

Vice President, Speaker of the House, President pro tempore of the Senate.

A unique ability I have is my leadership capabilities. When times get rough, it is easier for me to take control of a situation and micro-manage each of the issues. Also having a deep understanding of what is happening and why is another ability I have that adds on to my leadership abilities. Having this ability has helped in many cases, and will continue to help in many more.

I hope this helps! :)

Answer:

Bill Clinton

Explanation:

In 1980, President Jimmy Carter appointed Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the U.S Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. She served there until she was appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1993 by President Bill Clinton, selected to fill the seat vacated by Justice Byron White.

Answer: Yes&No depends on the kind of government we are trying to become.

Explanation:

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Answer:

Answer:

safe speed for the larger radius track u= √2 v

Explanation:

The sum of the forces on either side is the same, the only difference is the radius of curvature and speed.

Also given that r_1= smaller radius

r_2= larger radius curve

r_2= 2r_1..............i

let u be the speed of larger radius curve

now, \sum F = \frac{mv^2}{r_1} =\frac{mu^2}{r_2}∑F=

r

1

mv

2

=

r

2

mu

2

................ii

form i and ii we can write

v^2= \frac{1}{2} u^2v

2

=

2

1

u

2

⇒u= √2 v

therefore, safe speed for the larger radius track u= √2 v

Considering the legal practice and standards, it is false that in a case involving internet transactions, jurisdiction is proper only when the defendant conducts substantial business in the jurisdiction online.

Jurisdiction online transaction is a legal issue that seeks to solve or justify court jurisdiction over a case or dispute involving a foreign defendant.

In this case, the normal principle state that having a foreign defendant access a website is not satisfactory to establish jurisdiction.

Therefore, for a court to justify exercising jurisdiction over a foreign defendant in Internet-based transactions, there must be multiple contacts in addition to the accessibility of a website.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "False."

Learn more about Jurisdiction of court here: https://brainly.com/question/10377896

Answer:

I am pretty sure it's "D"

Explanation:

It would be more dangerous if the cars bounced off. This is because the airbags will deploy if the car stops, leaving them only with the injuries they have. However, if they bounce off, they can hit additional cars or accidently fall off a cliff. The damage opportunity is worse if they bounce off.

I hope this helps! :)

Answer:

Explanation: the issue that matters to me is racism. It effects me because I'm

South Asian. It effects other people because if your black u get blamed for etc.

Answer:

The are the decision makers of the laws and justice

Explanation:

So I have to think about that one time to time but what I learned is that the congress are the main law makers behind the president as well. The President can only enforce the laws while congress makes them possible.

Answer:

Gideon v. Wainwright, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 18, 1963, ruled (9–0) that states are required to provide legal counsel to indigent defendants charged with a felony

Explanation:

In Gideon v. Wainwright, the united states supreme court ruled that the States are compelled to give poor defendants facing criminal charges legal representation.

The Supreme court is the highest judiciary body in the country which evaluates whether the laws are practiced properly or not. It helps to check the activities that are unconstitutional in the country and take strict actions against them.

Background information on the case stated that Gideon had been charged with breaking into a pub in Panama City, Florida. Gideon was arrested by the police. Due to his inability to pay for a lawyer, Gideon requested the judge to appoint one for him during his trial.

Following this case, the Supreme Court issued a majority decision on behalf of Gideon in 1963 which ensures the right to legal assistance for poor defendants in criminal proceedings in both federal and state courts.

Learn more about the supreme court, here:

https://brainly.com/question/1755400

#SPJ2

Answer:

Unless the teenagers do something really bad like so bad that they have to be in prison for 30-35 years then yeah they shouldn't be punished like adults do

Explanation:

The driver with a false sense of confidence may drive Reckless,  feeling that he or she is in total control. A significant traffic infraction where the driver of a vehicle drives very recklessly causes accidents or causes other harm. He is accused of operating a vehicle recklessly and causing fatalities.

At best, a misdemeanor charge, a fine, or even jail time could result from irresponsible driving. In the worst case, innocent lives might be impacted. Another issue to think about is the correlation between speeding fines and higher insurance rates.

Reckless driving refers to operating a vehicle while exhibiting a purposeful or wanton disregard for consequences or other road users' safety. When you receive a traffic ticket, it is likely because you disobeyed the law of the road and either caused an accident or property damage, or you may not have.

Learn more about Reckless Driving here:

https://brainly.com/question/28051699

#SPJ5

Answer:

The prosecutor repeated herself and spoke very loudly and clearly to the jury to help emphasize her point.

I hope this helped at all.

Answer:

EMPHASIZE

Explanatation

give special importance or prominence to (something) in speaking or writing.

Answer:

anger violence and not cooperating

Explanation:

look it up

Answer: 4 points

Explanation: If you are convicted of passing a stopped school bus with its red lights flashing, you will be fined at least $100 and four points will be added to your driving record.

Answer:

C........................

Answer:

An execution

Explanation:

This court order allows the Sheriff's office to collect money or property to get your judgement paid.

Answer:

D

No; because it distrupts school activities

Any activity done by the high school students for the expression of their opinions that disrupts the school activities would not be supported by the Tinker standard, as it violates the constitutional rights of the high school.

Rights which are awarded to a person by the virtue of the American constitution are his constitutional rights.

Expression of opinion refers to the voluntary activity done by an individual or a group to express their views regarding some activities that are being held against their likings.

In case the students undertake rallies for expressing their opinions, it is their right to do so, but doing this inside the school campus and during school hours violates the constitutional rights of the school.

Hence, option D holds true that Tinker standard would not support the activity of students expressing their opinions, as it overlaps the constitutional rights of the high school.

Learn more about constitutional rights here:

https://brainly.com/question/15625659

#SPJ2

Answer: It depends on the crime and the circumstances of your defense. If you're committing a serious felony, chances are you won't be able to claim self-defense.

Explanation:

Answer:

all of them

Explanation:

Answer:

When a defendant has been convicted of two or more crimes, the judge must determine how the defendant must serve his sentences. A concurrent sentence is a term of imprisonment equal to the length of the longest sentence. A consecutive sentence requires a defendant to serve two or more sentences back to back.

Explanation:

Hopes this helps! :)

Answer:

C

Explanation:

This type of business is owned and run by one person. Thus meaning there would be no legal distinction between the owner and the business.  

Answer:

A. Corporation

Explanation:

just took the test sole proprietorship is wrong

Answer:

Barack Hussein Obama II

Explanation:

milk then cereal gang

Answer:

obamna

Explanation:

Answer:

D, i hope you have a good rest of your day and find out the right answer.

Explanation: