Absolute and limited monarch...Will mark brainiest if answered correctly.. fake answers will be reported


1) I need evidence to show whether each was an absolute monarch, limited monarch, or both (can be in bullet points).

2) Then I need to put them in order on a line from limited monarchy to absolute monarchy with at least on sentence that explains there placement.

Answer:

Federalism is a system of government where there is one strong, central controlling authority.

Explanation:

Hope this helped! :)

Each power of government is responsible for implementing policies within their jurisdiction. The judiciary branch of government creates and upholds the laws of the courts and the legislative branch is responsible for creating laws within their specific local and state districts. The executive branch of government is responsible for creating and ensuring laws throughout the country are upheld.

Like what the first on said that it the true answe

Answer:

His three daughters

Explanation:

Goneril, Regan, and Cordelia

The International Monetary Fund aims to reducing global poverty, encouraging international trade, and promoting financial stability and economic growth.

Answer: Fundemental attribution errors, The actor-observer bias, and the self-serving bias.

Explanation:

Answer:

A

Explanation:

She saw the conditions they had to go through, and helped them and wrote about what she saw in a series of books.

Answer: On November 6, the United States recognized the Republic of Panama, and on November 18 the Hay-Bunau-Varilla Treaty was signed with Panama, granting the United States exclusive and permanent possession of the Panama Canal Zone.

Explanation:the answer is towards the bottom

Plz mark for brainlist

Thank you

Answer:

It gave the United States exclusive canal rights in Panama.

Explanation:

I think this is the answer

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

We are still improving and changing everyday so yes

Answer:

Yes they can If the government has a compelling interest it is seeking to protect, and the fundamental right the government seeks to restrict is fairly and narrowly regulated by the law in question, the restrictive law may be upheld by the courts.

Explanation:

Answer:

Yes, but only to a certain extent.

The government must be able to balance individual rights with the rights of the national interest. This may entirely depend on the level of security that the government would need. For example, other than fire balloons that were sent into the mainland of the US from Japan, there was little to no need for security for foreign invasions to the United States during World War II. This makes it so that in the probable cause of Japanese-descent residents to join the Axis Power is bar none, with no secure way to communicate. However, that does not mean that they would not be able to communicate information as a whole, but that it is typically only a one-way street, in which the Japanese government cannot fully help any dissenters within the United States. National Security is the only justifiable reason to enact limits on rights, and even then, it is frowned upon. Any other limitations, such as lockdowns for diseases, for example, are not justifiable in limiting a person's rights to their life choices, their liberties, and even equality of opportunities for each person depending on their job preferences.

At the end of the day, the government is to serve the people, not the other way around. The days of Feudalism and the security of Royalty is already over, and governments who fail to provide security, prosperity, and equality would either be overthrown by the people, or else by foreign interests.

Considering the context, if the leader of the delegations representing the prisoners referred to Roman soldiers who escaped the battle as "good and giant soldiers," his remarks imply that those-like him-who surrendered are "cowards."

A good soldier is expected to win a battle or retreat by escaping the battle to come back to fight.

However, when soldiers surrendered against the orders in the enemy's face, this was considered a cowardly act. Therefore, such soldiers are described as cowardly.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "Coward."

Learn more Cowards in the Military here: https://brainly.com/question/6879062

They got into a major confrontation with the confederates.

Explanation:

The 6th Massachusets became the first union unit to take casualties in action on April 19th, 1861.

Answer:

The rights guaranteed in our constitution are what make our country great. We must protect them at all times, especially times of trouble.

Explanation:

Answer:

John Hancock in August 2, 1776.

Answer:

John Hancock

Explanation:

hope it's helps you

Answer:

He wanted the federal government to inherit the state's debts.

Explanation:

i think this is true. just reword it cuz its not my words.

hope this helps

Answer:

The Silk Road  was and is a network of trade routes connecting the East and West, from the 2nd century BCE to the 18th century CE. It was central to the economic, cultural, political, and religious interactions between these regions.The Silk Road” usually refers to certain land routes, but it may also refer to sea routes that connect East Asia and Southeast Asia with South Asia, Persia, the Arabian Peninsula, the Near East, East Africa & Southern Europe.

The Silk Road derives its name from the lucrative trade in silk that was carried out along its length beginning during the Han dynasty in China (207 BCE–220 CE). Around 114 BCE, the Han dynasty expanded the Central Asian sections of the Silk Road trade routes. The expansion was partly led by the missions and explorations of China’s imperial envoy, Zhang Qian, and partly accomplished through a series of military conquests.The Chinese took great interest in ensuring the security of the products they traded; they extended the Great Wall of China to protect the trade route.The Silk Road trade played a significant role in the development of the civilizations of China, Korea,Japan.the Indian subcontinent, Iran, Europe, the Horn of Africa and Arabia, opening long-distance political and economic relations between those civilizations.Though silk was the major item exported from China for trade, many other goods and ideas were exchanged, including religions (especially Buddhism), syncretic philosophies, scientific discoveries, and technologies like paper and gunpowder. Thus, the Silk Road was a route not only for cultural as well as economic trade among the civilizations that used it.Diseases, most notably plague, also spread along the Silk RoadIn the present day, trade takes place on the Silk Road on land and on its maritime branch. There are several projects under the name of “New Silk Road” to expand the transport infrastructure in the area of the historic trade routes. The best known is probably the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). In June 2014, UNESCO designated the Chang'an-Tianshan corridor of the Silk Road as a World Heritage Site.

Answer:

c is answering the questions

Answer:

the answer is c

Explanation:

hope this helps :)

Answer:

You need to put them in order from the first event to the last event of what happened

Answer:

I think that this is a matter of how everything happened, the sequence could be the order all these events took place.

Hope this helps!

Can I get Brainliest if this does help?

Answer:

Utah was the first state for the mormons

Answer:

Bob Heft

Explanation:

For an American history project during his junior year of high school in 1958, Bob Heft created a 50-star flag. The only problem was that at the time there were only 48 states. Bob had a hunch that two more states would be added and in 1959, Alaska and Hawaii became our 49th and 50th states.

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Answer: C

Explanation: its correct

Answer:

They are biased against people of colour.

Explanation:

Of particular concern to some on the right is the term “systemic racism,” often wrongly interpreted as an accusation that everyone in the system is racist. In fact, systemic racism means almost the opposite. It means that we have systems and institutions that produce racially disparate outcomes, regardless of the intentions of the people who work within them.

Answer:

Explanation:

Answer:

the Embargo Act of 1807.

Explanation:

Britain initiated a sweeping ban on trade, known as the Embargo Act of 1807. This law prohibited American ships from leaving their ports until Britain and France agreed to stop seizing them at sea. The embargo, however, caused far more damage to America's economy than to Britain's.

Answer:

Resumen

En este artículo el autor demuestra que los antecedentes del populismo son anteriores a la política de industrialización vía sustitución de importaciones y que los populismos latinoamericanos clásicos no pueden entenderse sin aquellos. Sostiene que en la consolidación del populismo como estrategia política se echan las bases para conformar un nuevo pacto de dominación que establece nuevas formas de relación entre Estado y sociedad. En el desarrollo de sus planteamientos el autor realiza un repaso crítico de lo principal de la literatura existente sobre el populismo latinoamericano y trata de llegar a algunas conclusiones, buscando extraer las consecuencias teóricas de lo expuesto.

Palabras clave: Populismo / Oligarquía / Estado oligárquico / Liderazgo populista / Pacto de dominación