A researcher studied the relationship between the number of times a certain species of cricket will chirp in one minute and the temperature outside. Her data is expressed in the scatter plot and line of best fit below. Based on the line of best fit, what temperature would it most likely be outside if this same species of cricket were measured to chirp 120 times in one minute?

Answer:

Let's assume that the number of child tickets sold is "c" and the number of adult tickets sold is "a".

We can set up a system of two equations to represent the given information:

c + a = 145 (equation 1, the total number of tickets sold is 145)

6.2c + 9.6a = 1109.8 (equation 2, the total sales is $1109.80)

We can use equation 1 to solve for "a" in terms of "c":

a = 145 - c

Substitute this expression for "a" into equation 2 and solve for "c":

6.2c + 9.6(145 - c) = 1109.8

Simplifying the equation:

6.2c + 1392 - 9.6c = 1109.8

-3.4c = -282.2

c = 83

Therefore, 83 child tickets were sold on Thursday. We can find the number of adult tickets sold by substituting the value of "c" into the equation for "a":

a = 145 - c

a = 145 - 83

a = 62

Therefore, 62 adult tickets were sold on Thursday.

The correct option is (E) e-y = cos(x).To solve the given differential equation using the separation of variables technique and including the provided terms.

Let's first identify the correct initial condition and rewrite the equation. The correct initial condition should be y(-π) = 0.
The given differential equation is:

dy/dx = ey sin(x)

We can separate the variables as:

dy/ey = sin(x) dx

Integrating both sides, we get:

ln|y| = -cos(x) + C

where C is the constant of integration. Exponentiating both sides, we get:

|y| = e-C e-cos(x)

Now, using the initial condition y(0) = e^y sin(0) = 0, we get:

|y| = e-C

Since we are given that y(-π) = 0, we have:

|y| = e-C = eπ

Therefore, C = -π and the solution for y(x) is:

y(x) = ±e-π e-cos(x)

Simplifying further, we get:

y(x) = eπ e-cos(x)    (for y > 0)

or

y(x) = -eπ e-cos(x)   (for y < 0)

To learn more about equation visit;

brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ11

To solve the differential equation, use separation of variables technique and integrate both sides. Apply the initial condition to find the value of the constant. The correct solution is B) e-y = -cos(x) + 2.

To solve the differential equation using separation of variables technique, we start by rewriting the equation as:

eydy = sin(x)dx

Next, we integrate both sides of the equation. The integral of eydy is simply ey, and the integral of sin(x)dx is -cos(x). So we have:

ey = -cos(x) + C

Finally, applying the initial condition y(-π) = 0, we can solve for C and obtain the solution:

ey = -cos(x) + 2

Therefore, the correct solution is option B: e-y = -cos(x) + 2.

https://brainly.com/question/33433874

#SPJ12

Given the series 2, 4, 7, 11, 16, the next number in the series is 22.

Note that series usually have an underlying pattern. In this case, the pattern is that the number added to the previous number to get the new one is increasing arithmetically.

that is

1 +1  = 2
2 + 2 = 4
3 + 4 = 7
4 + 7 = 11
5 + 11 = 16


As you can see , aded 1, then 2, then 3 and so on. Hence it means that we must add 6 to the previous number to get the next number:

That is


6 + 16 = 22

Hence, 22 is the next number in the series.

Learn more about series:
https://brainly.com/question/15692483?
#SPJ1

Answer:

Is there any attachment i can see? it would help alot with your question..

Step-by-step explanation:

In conducting a charitable casino night, it may not be prudent to assign more points to high probability events, to ensure a varied and engaging experience for participants. Allocating higher points to high-probability events may result in a less interesting event as participants may only focus on such games, thereby limiting the event’s excitement and diversity.

In a charitable casino night, the aim is usually to encourage guests to participate and have fun, rather than to accrue massive points or wins. If you do not balance the point allocation, you might disempower some games and foster focus on others, leading to possible monotony. Moreover, high probability games tend to have lower payouts in actual casino practice to maintain house advantage. Thus, diversifying point allocations can ensure a mix of high and low probability events, creating a more exciting experience for your guests.

Why Not Higher Points For High Probability Events?

High probability events often have lower payouts. This is because in a real casino, this is the method used to maintain the house advantage. The more likely an event is to occur, the less it pays out when it does occur. This keeps a balance between the payout and probability, ensuring the casino doesn't lose money.

https://brainly.com/question/31753821

#SPJ2

H is closed under scalar multiplication and vector addition, and hence it is a subspace of R³.

The correct answer is B.

To show that H is a subspace of R³, we need to show that it satisfies two conditions: (1) it contains the zero vector, and (2) it is closed under scalar multiplication and vector addition.

Condition (1) is satisfied since we can set t=0 in the expression tv=[7t 0 -5] to get the zero vector [0 0 0],

which is in H.

For condition (2), let u=[7t₁ 0 -5] and v=[7t₂ 0 -5] be two vectors in H, and let c be a scalar.

Then,

cu = c[7t₁ 0 -5] = [7ct₁ 0 -5c]

which is also in H since it has the same form as the vectors in H.

Also,

u + v = [7t₁ 0 -5] + [7t₂ 0 -5] = [7(t₁+t₂) 0 -10]

which is also in H since it has the same form as the vectors in H.

Therefore, H is closed under scalar multiplication and vector addition, and hence it is a subspace of R³.

learn more about subspace

https://brainly.com/question/30318872

#SPJ11

H is closed under scalar multiplication and vector addition, and hence it is a subspace of R³.

The correct answer is B.

To show that H is a subspace of R³, we need to show that it satisfies two conditions: (1) it contains the zero vector, and (2) it is closed under scalar multiplication and vector addition.

Condition (1) is satisfied since we can set t=0 in the expression tv=[7t 0 -5] to get the zero vector [0 0 0],

which is in H.

For condition (2), let u=[7t₁ 0 -5] and v=[7t₂ 0 -5] be two vectors in H, and let c be a scalar.

Then,

cu = c[7t₁ 0 -5] = [7ct₁ 0 -5c]

which is also in H since it has the same form as the vectors in H.

Also,

u + v = [7t₁ 0 -5] + [7t₂ 0 -5] = [7(t₁+t₂) 0 -10]

which is also in H since it has the same form as the vectors in H.

Therefore, H is closed under scalar multiplication and vector addition, and hence it is a subspace of R³.

learn more about subspace

https://brainly.com/question/30318872

#SPJ11

The answer of the given question based on the logarithm is , (a) x + y = 12 , (b) 4x + 4y , (c) it can't be simplified it doesn't have any factors in common with 2 or 3. , (d)  2x .

A logarithm is a mathematical function that determines how many times a certain number (called the base) must be multiplied by itself to obtain another number. In other words, it is a measure of the power to which a base must be raised to produce a given number.

(a) Using the fact that 6 = 2 * 3, we can rewrite logb6 as logb(2 * 3) = logb2 + logb3. Therefore, using the given values of x and y, we have:

logb6 = logb2 + logb3 = x + y

Since we are given that logb6 = 12, we can solve for x + y:

x + y = 12

(b) Using the fact that 1296 = 6⁴, we can rewrite logb1296 as logb(6⁴) = 4logb6. Therefore, using the value we found for logb6 in part (a), we have:

logb1296 = 4logb6 = 4(x + y) = 4x + 4y

(c) We can't simplify logb281 any further since it doesn't have any factors in common with 2 or 3. Therefore, we can't express it solely in terms of x and y.

(d) Using the fact that logb9 = 2 and logb2 = x, we have:

logb9logb2 = 2logb2 = 2x

To know more about Function visit:

https://brainly.com/question/10500042

SPJ1

The confidence interval would include 1, and the number 1 would be in the confidence interval if we failed to reject H0.

If we failed to reject the null hypothesis H0: σ1² = σ2², we would conclude that there is not enough evidence to suggest that the variances of the two populations are significantly different.

In this case, the confidence interval for the ratio of the variances would contain 1, since a ratio of 1 would correspond to equal variances.

The confidence interval for the ratio of the variances can be calculated using the F-distribution, and can be expressed as:

[ F(α/2,n1-1,n2-1) , F(1-α/2,n1-1,n2-1) ]

where F(α/2,n1-1,n2-1) and F(1-α/2,n1-1,n2-1) are the values from the F-distribution corresponding to the lower and upper limits of the confidence interval, respectively.

If we failed to reject H0, then the calculated test statistic F would not be greater than the critical value F(1-α/2,n1-1,n2-1) or less than the critical value F(α/2,n1-1,n2-1).

Know more about confidence interval here:

https://brainly.com/question/29680703

#SPJ11

The standard deviation for this probability distribution is approximately 0.796.

We can use the formula for the standard deviation of a discrete probability distribution:

σ = √[∑(x - μ)² P(x)]

where x is the number of red balls drawn, P(x) is the probability of drawing x red balls, and μ is the expected value of x.

The expected value of x is:

μ = ∑ x P(x) = 0(0.4565) + 1(0.4091) + 2(0.1222) + 3(0.0122) = 0.9797

So, we have:

σ = √[∑(x - μ)² P(x)]

= √[(0 - 0.9797)²(0.4565) + (1 - 0.9797)²(0.4091) + (2 - 0.9797)²(0.1222) + (3 - 0.9797)²(0.0122)]

≈ 0.796

Rounding to 3 decimal places, we get:

σ ≈ 0.796

Therefore, the standard deviation for this probability distribution is approximately 0.796.

To learn more about Rounding visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29022222

#SPJ11

The two statements are not equivalent. To determine whether the two statements are equivalent, we need to examine their logical structures. The statements given are:

1. p ∼ q
2. ∼ (∼ p ∧ q)

The first statement, p ∼ q, represents the exclusive disjunction (XOR) of p and q, which means it is true if either p or q is true, but not both.

The second statement, ∼ (∼ p ∧ q), involves a double negation of p and a conjunction with q. To simplify, we can apply De Morgan's law:

∼ (∼ p ∧ q) = p ∨ ∼ q

This represents the disjunction (OR) of p and the negation of q, which means it is true if p is true or if q is false.

Upon comparing the simplified forms of these two statements, we can see that they are not equivalent, as their logical structures differ:

1. p ∼ q (XOR)
2. p ∨ ∼ q (OR with negation)

Know more about logical structures here:

https://brainly.com/question/29750264

#SPJ11

Acceleration in the x-direction is 8 and acceleration in the y-direction is -4. The equation of the streamline passing through the origin is y = (1/2)x², which is obtained by solving a separable differential equation.

To compute acceleration in the x-direction, we need to take the partial derivative of the x-component of the velocity field with respect to time. Since there is no explicit dependence on time, we only need to compute the partial derivative of the x-component with respect to x and the partial derivative of the y-component with respect to y, and then multiply them by the appropriate factors:

a_x = (∂u/∂x) * u + (∂u/∂y) * v
   = (2) * (2) + (-2) * (-2)
   = 8

Similarly, to compute acceleration in the y-direction, we need to take the partial derivative of the y-component of the velocity field with respect to time, and we get:

a_y = (∂v/∂x) * u + (∂v/∂y) * v
   = (-2) * (2) + (-2) * (-2)
   = -4

Therefore, the acceleration in the x-direction is 8 and the acceleration in the y-direction is -4.

To determine the equation of the streamline that passes through the origin, we need to solve the differential equation:

dx/dt = u = 2 - 2y
dy/dt = v = -2x

We can eliminate t by using the chain rule to get:

dy/dx = v/u = -x/(1-y)

This is a separable differential equation that we can solve by integrating:

∫(1-y)dy = -∫x dx
y - (1/2)y² = - (1/2)x² + C
where C is a constant of integration.

Since the streamline passes through the origin, we have y = 0 and x = 0 when we substitute into the equation above, and we get:

C = 0

Therefore, the equation of the streamline that passes through the origin is:

y = (1/2)x²

Learn more about derivatives here: brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ11

There are 14 7/8" left over from the full 13-foot length of ABS pipe after cutting the three sections and accounting for the saw cuts.

To find out what is left over from the full length of the ABS pipe, we need to add up the lengths of the three sections that were cut:

33 3/8" + 56 5/8" + 39 7/8" = 129 6/8" or 129 3/4"

Next, we need to subtract the total length of the cut sections from the original length of the pipe, but we need to take into account the width of the saw cut, which is 1/8". So, we need to add 1/8" to the total length of the cut sections before subtracting it from the original length:

12 feet = 144 inches
144 inches - (129 3/4" + 1/8") = 14 7/8"

Therefore, there is 14 7/8" of ABS pipe left over from the full length after the three sections were cut, accounting for the width of the saw cut.
To determine the leftover length of the ABS pipe, we first need to calculate the total length of the cut sections, including the width of the saw cuts.

1. Convert the 12' length to inches: 12' × 12" = 144"
2. Add the lengths of the three cut sections: 33 3/8" + 56 5/8" + 39 7/8" = 129 7/8"
3. Account for the saw cuts: Since there are 3 cuts, there are 2 saw cuts between them, so 2 × 1/8" = 1/4"
4. Calculate the total length used: 129 7/8" + 1/4" = 130 1/8"
5. Subtract the total length used from the full length: 144" - 130 1/8" = 13 7/8"

Learn more about arithmetic here: brainly.com/question/11559160

#SPJ11

Answer:

$5 × 2 × (26 + 25) = $5 × 2 × 51 = $5 × 102

= $510

B is the correct answer.

1. The values of x for which the expression is defined;

1. x ≥ 0   2. x ≥ 3    3. x ≥ 0    4. x ≥ 3 and x ≠ 0.

2. The acceptable value of x for the simplified expression;

5.  6x√x,             6.  √(x² - 64),

7. 2x,                     8.  √(25 / (x + 2)),

9. √(x / 9)              10. √(10) or 3.2,  

1. for the inequality √(2x) × √(x + 1) must be non-negative:

2x ≥ 0 => x ≥ 0

x + 1 ≥ 0 => x ≥ -1

if we are to combine terms we find that  x ≥ 0 satisfy both terms.

2. To simplify the expression as much as possible for the value of x

√20x³ ÷ √5x

= (√20x³) / (√5x)

= √(20x³ / 5x)

= √(4x²)

= 2x

The answers are from the questions below as seen in the picture;

1. Write the inequality that shows the values of x for which the expression is defined. 1. √2x  ×  √x + 1      2. √x - 2  ×  √x - 3     3. √5x²   ÷  √2x   4. √x - 3    ÷ √x²

2. Simplify the expression as much as possible for the acceptable value of x.

5. √18x  ×  √2x²      6. √x + 8   ×  √x - 8     7. √20x³    ÷  √5x    8. √75(x + 2)   ÷   √3(x + 2)²    9. √10/x    ×   √x²/90     10. √x³/5   ×   √50/x³

Find more exercises on finding the values of x for which the expression is defined;

https://brainly.com/question/12484252

#SPJ1

It is all proved that,

(a) R(T+U) SR(T) +R(U).

(b) If W is finite-dimensional, then rank(T+U) < rank(T)+ rank(U).

(c) rank(A + B) < rank(A) + rank(B) for any m X n matrices A and B.

(a) To prove that R(T+U)⊆R(T)+R(U), let y be any vector in R(T+U). Then, there exists a vector x such that (T+U)x = y. We can rewrite this as Tx + Ux = y. Since Tx is in R(T) and Ux is in R(U), we have y = Tx + Ux ∈ R(T) + R(U). Therefore, we have shown that R(T+U)⊆R(T)+R(U).

To prove that R(T)+R(U)⊆R(T+U), let y be any vector in R(T)+R(U). Then, there exist vectors x and z such that Tx = y and Uz = y. We can rewrite this as (T+U)x - Ux + Uz = y. Since (T+U)x is in R(T+U) and Ux-Uz is in R(U), we have y = (T+U)x + (Ux-Uz) ∈ R(T+U). Therefore, we have shown that R(T)+R(U)⊆R(T+U).

Hence, we have proved that R(T+U) = R(T) + R(U).

(b) Let A be the matrix representation of T with respect to some basis of W, and let B be the matrix representation of U with respect to the same basis. Then, the matrix representation of T+U is A+B. By the rank-nullity theorem, we have rank(T) = dim(R(T)) = dim(W) - nullity(T), where nullity(T) is the dimension of the null space of T. Similarly, we have rank(U) = dim(W) - nullity(U).

Now, since W is finite-dimensional, the nullity of T+U is at least the nullity of T and the nullity of U, i.e., nullity(T+U) ≥ nullity(T) and nullity(T+U) ≥ nullity(U). Therefore, we have:

rank(T+U) = dim(W) - nullity(T+U)

≤ dim(W) - min(nullity(T), nullity(U))

= rank(T) + rank(U) - dim(W)

< rank(T) + rank(U)

Therefore, we have shown that rank(T+U) < rank(T) + rank(U) if W is finite-dimensional.

(c) Let A and B be m x n matrices. We can view A and B as linear transformations from [tex]R^n[/tex] to [tex]R^m[/tex]. Let T and U be the linear transformations represented by A and B, respectively. Then, we have:

rank(A+B) = rank(T+U) < rank(T) + rank(U)

= dim(R(T)) + dim(R(U))

= rank(A) + rank(B)

Therefore, we have shown that rank(A+B) < rank(A) + rank(B) for any m x n matrices A and B.

To know more about matrices, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/31424542#

#SPJ11

1. The person should be positioned 3.59 feet from the fulcrum to balance the system.

2. The volume of the solid generated by rotating the circle is V ≈ 33510.32 cubic units.

To find the distance between the person and the fulcrum, we need to use the principle of moments, which states that the sum of the moments acting on a body in equilibrium is zero. In this case, the moments are the weights of the object and the person acting on opposite sides of the fulcrum.

Let x be the distance between the person and the fulcrum, and let L-x be the distance between the object and the fulcrum. Then we can write:

214(x) = 550(L-x)

Simplifying this equation, we get:

Plugging in L=5 feet, we get:

x = (550/764)*5 = 3.59 feet

Therefore, the person should be positioned 3.59 feet from the fulcrum to balance the system.

The equation x² + (y-10)² = 64 represents a circle with center (0,10) and radius 8.

To find the volume of the solid generated by rotating this circle about the x-axis, we can use the formula for the volume of a solid of revolution:

V = π∫[a,b] y² dx

where y is the distance from the x-axis to the circle at a given value of x, and [a,b] is the interval of x-values that the circle passes through.

Since the circle is centered at (0,10), we have y = 10 ± [tex]\sqrt^(64-x^2)[/tex]. However, we only want the upper half of the circle (i.e., the part above the x-axis), so we take y = 10 + [tex]\sqrt^(64-x^2)[/tex]. The interval of x-values that the circle passes through is [-8,8].

Thus, the volume of the solid of revolution is:

Using the substitution x = 8sin(t), dx = 8cos(t) dt, we can evaluate the second integral as:

∫[-8,8] [tex]\sqrt^(64-x^2)[/tex] dx = 8∫[-π/2,π/2] cos²(t) dt = 8∫[-π/2,π/2] (1+cos(2t))/2 dt = 8π

Using the substitution x = 8u, dx = 8 du, we can evaluate the third integral as:

∫[-8,8] (64-x²) dx = 2∫[0,1] (64-64u²) du = 2(64)

Therefore, the volume of the solid of revolution is:

V = π(100(16) + 20(8π) + 2(64))

= 3200π/3

Rounding to two decimal places, we get:

V ≈ 33510.32 cubic units.

Learn more about distance and volume

brainly.com/question/21287703

#SPJ11

So  the values of c are:

a) P(X < 1,Y < 2) = 0.0244

b) P(1 < X < 2) = 0.102c

c) P(Y > 3) = 0.0014c

d)  P(X < 2, Y < 2) = 0.073c

e) E(X) = c/12

f) E(Y) = c/18

g) f(x) =∫[0,x] [tex]ce^{(-2x-3y)}[/tex]

= c/3 (1 -[tex]e^{(-3x)}[/tex])

h) f(X=1) = c

i) E(Y|X=1) = 1/2

j)[tex]f(x|y=2) = c/2 * e^{(-4-2y)} * (e^{(4)}-1) / [c/4 * (e^5))[/tex]

a) To find P(X < 1, Y < 2), we need to integrate the joint probability density function over the region where 0 < x < 1 and 0 < y < 2.

∫∫f(x,y) dA = ∫[0,1]∫[0,y] [tex]ce^{(-2x-3y)}[/tex]dxdy

= ∫[0,2]∫[x/2,1] [tex]ce^{(-2x-3y)}[/tex] dydx (since 0 < x < 1 and 0 < y < x)

= [tex]c/6 [1 - e^{(-4)} - 2e^{(-3)} + e^{(-7)}][/tex] ≈ 0.0244

b) To find P(1 < X < 2), we need to integrate the joint probability density function over the region where 1 < x < 2 and 0 < y < x.

∫∫f(x,y) dA = ∫[1,2]∫[0,x] [tex]ce^{(-2x-3y)}[/tex] dydx

= [tex]c/3 [e^{(-2)} - e^{(-5)}][/tex] ≈ 0.102c

c) To find P(Y > 3), we need to integrate the joint probability density function over the region where 0 < x < ∞ and 3 < y < x.

∫∫f(x,y) dA = ∫[3,∞]∫[y,x] [tex]ce^{(-2x-3y)}[/tex] dxdy

= c/6 [tex]e^{(-9)}[/tex] ≈ 0.0014c

d) To find P(X < 2, Y < 2), we need to integrate the joint probability density function over the region where 0 < x < 2 and 0 < y < 2.

∫∫f(x,y) dA = ∫[0,2]∫[0,y] [tex]ce^{(-2x-3y)}[/tex] dxdy

= [tex]c/6 [1 - e^{(-4)} - 3e^{(-6)}][/tex] ≈ 0.073c

e) To find E(X), we need to integrate the product of X and the joint probability density function over the range of X and Y.

E(X) = ∫∫xf(x,y) dA = ∫[0,∞]∫[0,x] cx [tex]e^{(-2x-3y)}[/tex]dydx

= c/12

f) To find E(Y), we need to integrate the product of Y and the joint probability density function over the range of X and Y.

E(Y) = ∫∫yf(x,y) dA = ∫[0,∞]∫[0,x] cy [tex]e^{(-2x-3y)}[/tex] dydx

= c/18

g) To find the marginal probability distribution of X, we need to integrate the joint probability density function over all possible values of Y.

f(x) = ∫f(x,y) dy = ∫[0,x]  dy[tex]ce^{(-2x-3y)}[/tex]

= c/3 (1 -[tex]e^{(-3x)}[/tex])

h) To find the conditional probability distribution of Y given that X = 1, we need to use the conditional probability formula:

f(Y|X=1) = f(X,Y) / f(X=1)

where f(X=1) is the marginal probability distribution of X evaluated at X=1.

f(X=1) = c

i) To find E(Y|X=1), we need to first find the conditional density function f(y|x=1). Using Bayes' theorem, we have:

f(y|x=1) = f(x=1,y) / f(x=1)

To find f(x=1,y), we can integrate f(x,y) over the range of y such that 0<y<1:

f(x=1,y) = ∫[y=0 to y=1] f(x=1,y)dy

= ∫[y=0 to y=1] [tex]ce^{(-2(1)-3y)}[/tex]dy

= [tex]ce^{(-5)}/3 * (1-e^{(-3)})[/tex]

To find f(x=1), we can integrate f(x,y) over the range of y such that 0<y<1 and x such that x=y to x=1:

f(x=1) = ∫[y=0 to y=1] ∫[x=y to x=1] [tex]ce^{(-2x-3y)}[/tex]dxdy

= ∫[y=0 to y=1] [tex]ce^{(-5y)/2}[/tex] dy

= [tex]c*(1-e^{(-5)})/10[/tex]

Thus, we have:

[tex]f(y|x=1) = ce^{(-5)/3} * (1-e^{(-3)}) / [c(1-e^{(-5)})/10][/tex]

[tex]= 2/3 * e^{(2y/3)} * (1-e^{(-3)}) / (1-e^{(-5)})[/tex]

Using this conditional density function, we can find E(Y|X=1) as follows:

E(Y|X=1) = ∫[y=0 to y=1] y*f(y|x=1)dy

= ∫[y=0 to y=1] y * 2/3 * [tex]e^{(2y/3)} * (1-e^{(-3)}) / (1-e^[(-5)}) dy[/tex]

= 1/2

Therefore, E(Y|X=1) = 1/2.

j) To find the conditional probability distribution of X given Y=2, we need to find f(x|y=2). Using Bayes' theorem, we have:

f(x|y=2) = f(x,y=2) / f(y=2)

To find f(x,y=2), we can integrate f(x,y) over the range of x such that y<x<2:

f(x,y=2) = ∫[x=y to x=2] f(x,y=2)dx

= ∫[x=y to x=2] [tex]c*e^{(-2x-6)}[/tex]dx

= c/2 * [tex]e^{(-4-2y) }* (e^{(4)}-1)[/tex]

To find f(y=2), we can integrate f(x,y) over the range of x such that y<x<2 and y such that 0<y<2:

f(y=2) = ∫[y=0 to y=2] ∫[x=y to x=2] [tex]c*e^{(-2x-3y)}[/tex]dxdy

= ∫[y=0 to y=2] c/2 *[tex]e^{(-3y)} * (e^{(4)}-e^{(-4)}) dy[/tex]

[tex]= c/4 * (e^5-e^{(-5)})[/tex]

Thus, we have:

[tex]f(x|y=2) = c/2 * e^{(-4-2y)} * (e^{(4)}-1) / [c/4 * (e^5))[/tex]

Learn more about probability density function

brainly.com/question/29062095

#SPJ11

the value of c that makes the function f(x, y) = ce^−2x−3y a joint probability density function over the given range is:
[tex]c = -6 / (e^−5-1)[/tex]

To determine the value of c that makes the function f(x, y) = [tex]ce^−2x−3y[/tex] a joint probability density function over the range 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 and 0 ≤ y ≤ 1, we need to make sure that the function integrates to 1 over this range. This is because the total probability over the entire range should equal 1.

Step 1: Set up the double integral
To ensure that the function integrates to 1, we can set up a double integral over the given range:

∫∫ f(x, y) dx dy = 1

Step 2: Plug in the function and limits
Now we can plug in the function and the limits for x and y:

∫₀¹ ∫₀¹ ce^−2x−3y dx dy = 1

Step 3: Integrate with respect to x
Integrate the function with respect to x:

∫₀¹ [(-c/2)e^−2x−3y]₀¹ dy = 1

Evaluate the integral at the limits:

∫₀¹ [-c/2(e^−2−3y - e^−3y)] dy = 1

Step 4: Integrate with respect to y
Now integrate with respect to y:

[-c/6(e^−5 - 1)]₀¹ = 1

Evaluate the integral at the limits:

- c/6(e^−5 - 1) = 1

Step 5: Solve for c
Finally, solve for c:

c = -6 / (e^−5 - 1)

So, the value of c that makes the function f(x, y) = ce^−2x−3y a joint probability density function over the given range is:

c = -6 / (e^−5 - 1)

To know more about joint probability density function refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14283399

#SPJ11

The value of coefficient b of the polynomial y = ax^2 +bx + c is -126.

To find the coefficient b of the polynomial form y = ax^2 + bx + c, we need to first expand the given standard form of the parabola y = 9(x - 7)^2 + 5.

Step 1: Expand the square term
(y - 5) = 9(x - 7)^2

Step 2: Expand the equation
y - 5 = 9(x^2 - 14x + 49)

Step 3: Distribute the 9 to each term inside the parenthesis
y - 5 = 9x^2 - 126x + 441

Step 4: Add 5 to both sides to get the polynomial form
y = 9x^2 - 126x + 446

Now compare y = 9x^2 - 126x + 446 with y = ax^2 + bx + c, so that value of the constant a, b, c is a = 9, b = -126, and c = 446. So, the coefficient b of the polynomial form is -126.

Explanation: - Given a equation of parabola y = 9 (x - 7)^2+5, first we expand the expression and make it as a quadratic equation and compare with equation ax^2 +bx + c.

Know more about the" coefficient of the polynomial" click here;

https://brainly.com/question/31407099

#SPJ11

The half-life of this radioactive material is , 62.126 years

The half-life of the radioactive material, we can use the formula:

N(t) = N⁰ [tex]e^{-kt}[/tex]

where N(t) is the amount of material remaining after time t, N0 is the initial amount of material, k is the decay constant, and e is the mathematical constant approximately equal to 2.71828.

We know that the initial mass of the material was 100 grams and the mass after 20 years was 80 grams.

This means that the amount of material remaining after 20 years is:

N(20) = 80/100 = 0.8

We also know that the time required for the material to be reduced by half is the half-life, so we can set N(t) = 0.5N0 and solve for t:

0.5N0 = N⁰ [tex]e^{-kt}[/tex]

0.5 = [tex]e^{-kt}[/tex]

ln(0.5) = -kt

t = ln(0.5)/(-k)

To find k, we can use the fact that the material decay rate is proportional to the amount present:

k = ln(2)/t_half

where t_half is the half-life.

Substituting this into the equation for t, we get:

t = ln(0.5)/(-ln(2)/t_half)

Simplifying this expression, we get:

t = t_half * ln(2)

Using the given answer choices, we can try plugging in values for t_half and see which one gives us a value close to 20 years:

If t_half = 54.343 years, then t = 37.38 years, which is too low.

If t_half = 56.442 years, then t = 38.93 years, which is also too low.

If t_half = 59.030 years, then t = 40.68 years, which is too high.

If t_half = 61.045 years, then t = 42.33 years, which is too high.

If t_half = 62.126 years, then t = 43.13 years, which is close to 20 years.

Therefore, the half-life of this radioactive material is, 62.126 years.

Learn more about the probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ12

If the mu/p ratio for pizza is less than the mu/p ratio for soda, this means that an individual is receiving more utility per dollar from soda than pizza (Option A).

In other words, the marginal utility of spending one more dollar on soda is greater than spending one more dollar on pizza. This doesn't necessarily mean that the price of pizza is lower than the price of soda (Option B) or that the price of pizza is lower than the price of coke (Option C), as the prices of the two goods could be equal or have different relative prices. It also doesn't mean that the MU of pizza is lower than the MU of soda (Option D), as the MU of each good could be different regardless of their price ratios.

The final answer is: Option A

Learn more about : Marginal Consumer Surplus - https://brainly.com/question/31497638

#SPJ11

Answer:

270

Step-by-step explanation:

I may or may not be lying >:^P

The probability that the response time of a subject is more than 9 seconds can be expressed as:

P(X > 9) = 1 - P(X ≤ 9)

We can find P(X ≤ 9) by standardizing X and using the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the standard Gamma distribution. Specifically, we can compute:

Z = (X - μ) / σ = (9 - 12) / 6 = -0.5

Using a standard Gamma distribution table or software, we can find the CDF for Z = -0.5 to be approximately 0.3085.

Therefore:

P(X > 9) = 1 - P(X ≤ 9) ≈ 1 - 0.3085 ≈ 0.6915

So the probability that the response time of a subject is more than 9 seconds is approximately 0.6915 or 69.15%.

*IG:whis.sama_ent*

I may or may not be lying >:^P

The probability that the response time of a subject is more than 9 seconds can be expressed as:

P(X > 9) = 1 - P(X ≤ 9)

We can find P(X ≤ 9) by standardizing X and using the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the standard Gamma distribution. Specifically, we can compute:

Z = (X - μ) / σ = (9 - 12) / 6 = -0.5

Using a standard Gamma distribution table or software, we can find the CDF for Z = -0.5 to be approximately 0.3085.

Therefore:

P(X > 9) = 1 - P(X ≤ 9) ≈ 1 - 0.3085 ≈ 0.6915

So the probability that the response time of a subject is more than 9 seconds is approximately 0.6915 or 69.15%.

*IG:whis.sama_ent*

The sum of the given series[inifinity] is 4 when partial sums are given.

The sum of the series [infinity] an n = 1, whose partial sums are given by sn = 4 − 9(0.8)n, can be calculated as follows:

As n approaches infinity, the term 9(0.8)n approaches zero, since 0.8 is less than 1 and raised to a large power will become negligible.

Thus, the sum of the series is simply the limit of the partial sums as n approaches infinity. Taking the limit of sn as n approaches infinity, we get:

limn→∞ sn = limn→∞ (4 − 9(0.8)n) = 4

The series is given by an = sn − sn−1, where sn is the nth partial sum. In other words, each term of the series is the difference between successive partial sums. To find the sum of the series, we need to take the limit of the nth partial sum as n approaches infinity.

In this case, we are given the nth partial sum explicitly, so we can take the limit directly. As n becomes very large, the term 9(0.8)n becomes very small compared to 4 and can be ignored. This means that the sum of the series is simply the constant term 4.

This technique of finding the sum of a series by taking the limit of its partial sums is a common approach in calculus and real analysis and is often used to evaluate infinite series that do not have a closed-form expression.

To learn more about the Infinite series, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29062598

#SPJ11

The average rate of change of the function over the interval 2 ≤ x ≤ 6 is 4.

The average rate of change of a function over an interval is given by the formula:

average rate of change = (change in y) / (change in x)

where (change in y) = f(b) - f(a) and (change in x) = b - a.

Using the values given in the problem, we have:

(change in y) = f(6) - f(2) = 34 - 18 = 16

(change in x) = 6 - 2 = 4

So the average rate of change over the interval 2 ≤ x ≤ 6 is:

average rate of change = (change in y) / (change in x) = 16 / 4 = 4

Therefore, the average rate of change of the function over the interval 2 ≤ x ≤ 6 is 4.

Read more about rate of change at

https://brainly.com/question/17131025

#SPJ1

The sample size needed to provide a margin of error of 2 or less with a 0.95 probability when the population standard deviation equals 13 is approximately 163.

To estimate a population mean with a margin of error of 2 or less, a 0.95 probability, and a population standard deviation of 13, we need to calculate the required sample size. Here are the steps to do so:

1. Identify the given values:

the margin of error (E) = 2,

confidence level (CL) = 0.95, and

population standard deviation (σ) = 13.

2. Determine the Z-score corresponding to the confidence level.

For a 0.95 probability, the Z-score (Z) is 1.96, which represents the critical value for a 95% confidence interval.

3. Use the margin of error formula to calculate the sample size (n):
  E = Z * (σ / √n)

4. Rearrange the formula to solve for n:
  n = (Z * σ / E)²

5. Plug in the values:
  n = (1.96 * 13 / 2)²

6. Calculate the result:
  n ≈ 162.3076

7. Round up to the nearest whole number, as you cannot have a fraction of a sample:
  n ≈ 163

Learn more about the mean:

https://brainly.com/question/1136789

#SPJ11

Answer:

r = 3

Step-by-step explanation:

(r + 1)(r + 9) = 16r ← expand left side using FOIL

r² + 9r + r + 9 = 16r

r² + 10r + 9 = 16r ( subtract 16r from both sides )

r² - 6r + 9 = 0

(r - 3)² = 0 , then

r - 3 = 0 ( add 3 to both sides )

r = 3

The pooled standard deviation is approximately 11.98.

What is standard deviation?

Standard deviation is a statistical measure that describes the amount of variation or dispersion of a set of data points from their mean or average. It indicates how spread out the data is from the average value.

A low standard deviation indicates that the data is clustered closely around the mean, while a high standard deviation indicates that the data is more spread out. It is typically represented by the symbol σ (sigma) for a population or s for a sample.

The formula for the pooled standard deviation is:

[tex]sp = \sqrt{[((n1 - 1) * s1^2 + (n2 - 1) * s2^2) / (n1 + n2 - 2)][/tex]

where s1 and s2 are the sample standard deviations, and n1 and n2 are the sample sizes.

Substituting the given values, we get:

[tex]sp = \sqrt{[((15 - 1) * 10^2 + (25 - 1) * 13^2) / (15 + 25 - 2)][/tex]

[tex]= \sqrt{[(14 * 100 + 24 * 169) / 38][/tex]

[tex]= \sqrt{[5456 / 38][/tex]

[tex]= \sqrt{(143.57)[/tex]

≈ 11.98

Therefore, the pooled standard deviation is approximately 11.98.

To learn more about standard deviation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/475676

#SPJ1

B. 333 in.2

The area of the base is 81^2

lateral is 45 x 4 = 180^2  (9x5x4)

180^2 add the 72 pyramid = 252^2 + base of 81^2 = 333^2

The triangle shows us just the height

4 inches

We can see that height is smaller central isosceles height across the center base point.

We also can remember to use the length 9inches but divide by 2 and get each triangle area this way.

4 x 1/2 base = 4x 1/2 4.5 = 4 x 2.25 = 9^2 each right side triangle

9 x 8 = 72^2

we add the areas 72+ 81+lateral 180 = 333 inches^2

Read more about rectangular prism here:

https://brainly.com/question/1015291

#SPJ1