A foil is a character that has qualities or characteristics that are in direct contrast
with the qualities or characteristics of the protagonist. Foils often exist so that the
protagonist's flaws are more obvious and can be better understood.
In Act IV of Hamlet, two foils emerge. Who are they? Why are these two
characters foils of Hamlet? How are they Hamlet's foils? Please quote three
specific places in the play to illustrate how these two characters are foils. Two of
these places in the play should explain how / why the two are foils, and the third
place should show the contrasting characteristic in Hamlet (doesn't have to come
from Act IV only).

Answer: the question is not properly visible but I've added the answer.

Pls do the needful for the 5th question.

Explanation:

1. eats

2. hates

3. eat

4. enjoys

5. if it's they always, it would be eat. if it had a name, it would be eats

6. drinks

Answer:

D. unlikely to be peer-reviewed

Explanation:

A non-academic source will be magazine articles, news articles, and anything that does not have to be peer-reviewed in order to be published. Being peer-reviewed means that other experts have looked over the work and decided that it was good for publishing in a journal.

One controversial topic in the news currently is vaccine mandates. On one side of the issue, there are those who support vaccine mandates as a necessary measure to protect public health, while on the other side, there are those who oppose vaccine mandates as an infringement on individual liberty and personal choice.

Those who support vaccine mandates argue that vaccines are a crucial tool in preventing the spread of infectious diseases and that the benefits of vaccination far outweigh the risks. They point to the success of vaccine programs in eradicating diseases like smallpox and drastically reducing the incidence of other diseases like measles and polio. Vaccine mandates, they argue, are necessary to ensure that enough people are vaccinated to achieve herd immunity, which is when enough people in a community are vaccinated to provide indirect protection to those who cannot be vaccinated, such as infants or individuals with compromised immune systems.

Those in favor of vaccine mandates also argue that exemptions and alternatives are available for individuals who cannot receive vaccines for medical or religious reasons. They point out that these exemptions are not new, and have been in place for many years. However, opponents argue that these exemptions may not be sufficient to protect individual rights, and that there should be no coercion or penalties for those who choose not to vaccinate.

On the other side of the debate, those who oppose vaccine mandates argue that individuals have the right to make their own healthcare decisions without government interference. They point to concerns about vaccine safety and the potential for adverse reactions, although scientific studies have shown that vaccines are generally safe and effective. They also argue that vaccine mandates are a violation of personal autonomy and that individuals should be free to make their own choices about what medical treatments they receive.

Some opponents of vaccine mandates also argue that natural immunity acquired through infection is a viable alternative to vaccination, although this argument ignores the potential for serious complications or death from contracting the disease. They may also argue that the risks of vaccination outweigh the benefits, although the overwhelming scientific consensus is that vaccines are safe and effective.

On the other hand, opponents of vaccine mandates also argue that there may be unintended consequences to these policies. They suggest that mandates may lead to a backlash against vaccines, with individuals becoming more resistant to vaccination due to feeling forced to comply. They may also argue that mandates may undermine trust in public health authorities and government, and that voluntary compliance is a better approach to encouraging vaccination.

Those who oppose vaccine mandates also argue that they disproportionately affect marginalized communities who may have less access to healthcare or who have experienced discrimination in the healthcare system. They suggest that mandates may further exacerbate existing inequalities and reinforce systems of oppression.

~~~Harsha~~~

Answer:

Social Media Censorship

Arguments in favor of censorship

Advocates for government intervention argue that social media companies have become too powerful and are abusing their authority to censor content. They believe that government should intervene to ensure that social media companies respect the principles of free speech and do not discriminate against certain individuals or groups. They argue that social media companies have a responsibility to provide a forum for all voices to be heard, regardless of political affiliation or viewpoint. Additionally, they argue that government intervention would ensure that social media companies are transparent about their policies and practices, and are held accountable for any breaches.

They also argue that users must engage with social media in a responsible manner, and to promote civility and constructive dialogue online. They believe that users should be held accountable for the content they post and share. Furthermore, they should not use social media to spread hate or incite violence. Proponents also argue that users must fact-check information before sharing it. Users should also mind the potential impact of their words and actions.

Advocates for content moderation argue that it is necessary to ensure that social media platforms are safe and welcoming spaces for all users. They believe that content moderation can help to combat hate speech, harassment, and other harmful behaviors, and can promote constructive dialogue and civil discourse. They also argue that content moderation can protect vulnerable users, such as children and those who have experienced trauma.

Arguments against government intervention:

Opponents of government intervention argue that government should not regulate social media companies. They believe that government intervention could lead to even more censorship, and that it would undermine the principles of free speech and democracy. They argue that social media companies are private entities, and as such, have the right to determine their own policies and practices. Opponents of government intervention also argue that government regulation could be used to silence certain voices or viewpoints, and could lead to a chilling effect on free speech.

Opponents argue that it is unfair to place the burden of responsibility solely on individual users, when social media companies themselves have significant power and influence over the content that is shared on their platforms. They argue that social media companies should be held accountable for any harm that is caused by the content on their platforms, and that they should proactively moderate content. Additionally, opponents of user responsibility argue that many users may not have the knowledge or resources to fact-check information or understand the potential impact of their words and actions.

Opponents of content moderation argue that it is difficult to define and enforce community standards, and that content moderation can be arbitrary and inconsistent. They believe that content moderation can be used to silence certain voices or viewpoints and as a tool of censorship. Besides, content moderation can be costly and time-consuming. It may also detract from other important functions of social media platforms, such as facilitating communication and information-sharing.

Explanation:

Answer: B. Jamie asked, "May I go to the Art Institute with Caroline and her mother next Friday?"

Answer:

B.  Jamie asked, "May I go to the Art Institute with Caroline and her mother next Friday?"

Explanation:

The given sentences, "She couldn't believe they were going to her favorite place—Washington, D.C.", "They let the dough rise for a few hours; later, they kneaded it some more." and "What did you think of the book [that we read for class]?" have correct punctuations. The correct options are B, C and E.

Correct punctuation is essential for effective communication in writing, as it helps to convey the intended meaning of a sentence clearly and accurately. Sentence B is punctuated with a dash, which is used to separate the two clauses and add emphasis to the second clause. Sentence C uses a semicolon to separate two independent clauses that are closely related in meaning.

This creates a clear and concise sentence that is easy to understand. Sentence E uses brackets to enclose an inserted phrase within a sentence, which is a correct way to indicate that the phrase is not part of the original sentence but has been added for clarity. In summary, proper punctuation is crucial in writing as it helps to convey ideas accurately and concisely, making the meaning of the sentence clear to the reader.

The correct options are B, C and E.

To know more about punctuation , click here.

https://brainly.com/question/30789620

#SPJ1

Removing repetition from main ideas should be the first step in summary writing.

Removing repetition from main ideas should be the first step in summary writing because it helps to condense the information and make the summary more concise and focused. By eliminating redundant information, the summary becomes clearer and easier to understand.

Additionally, it helps to ensure that the main points are emphasized, which is important for conveying the key message of the original text.

By starting with this step, the writer can then move on to organizing and prioritizing the remaining information, resulting in a well-written summary that accurately captures the most important aspects of the original text.

To know more about summary writing, visit:

https://brainly.in/question/35412966

Here's a song poem:

Song Name: A Thousand Years

Singer: Christina Perri

I have died every day waiting for you

Darling, don't be afraid I have loved you

For a thousand years

I'll love you for a thousand more

Literal meaning: The persona has waited for their love for a long time and will continue to love them for a thousand years.

Speaker: The speaker is the persona who is expressing their love for someone else.

Tone: The tone is hopeful and romantic. Words like "loved" and "thousand" reveal the persona's devotion.

Connotative words: "Died" connotes a deep longing or desire, while "afraid" suggests that the loved one may have hesitations.

Concrete images: The line "I have died every day waiting for you" creates a vivid image of the persona's longing. The use of the phrase "a thousand years" suggests a long passage of time, and the repetition emphasizes the length of the persona's love.

Figures of speech: There are no figures of speech in this poem, but the phrase "a thousand years" is used as hyperbole to convey the extent of the persona's love.

Learn more about song on;

https://brainly.com/question/24370565

#SPJ1

The character's contradictory objectives are used to build tension by showcasing their ability to encourage others in moments of dread or danger.

Super Human, what is it?

The definition of a superhuman attribute states that it is greater than "normal human power, size, or competence." Comparing superhuman abilities to "normal" human abilities can help define superhuman abilities. For instance, superhuman speed can be characterised in relation to predicted and average human speed.

What impact do character motivations and actions have on a story?

The actions in a narrative and how the conflict is resolved will depend on a character's goals and actions. Character motivations are the driving forces behind a character's aims or behaviours. A bodily necessity or an emotional desire may be the driving force behind these motives.

To know more about characters motivation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28930958

#SPJ1

The complete question is:

Super Human..How do the characters conflicting motivations create tension? cite evidence from the text in your response.

Sonia, a new assistant district attorney, learns from her errors and wins the respect of her superiors. After being appointed an associate district attorney, Sonia understands how simple her job will be.

Throughout her time on the Supreme Court, Sotomayor has been renowned for her passionate dissents on matters of race, ethnicity, and gender identity, especially in the cases of Schuette v. BAMN, Utah v. Strieff, and Trump v. Hawaii. She has also been associated with concerns for the rights of defendants and criminal justice reform.

She acknowledged that "I didn't make it to where I am by myself" and emphasised the value of community and interacting with people. She discussed the significance of her grandmother's unwavering devotion.

To know more about Sonia visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/30938341

#SPJ1

Answer:

At the beginning of chapter 7 of "Their Eyes Were Watching God," Janie's state of mind is disillusioned and disappointed. She has just returned from her trip with Jody to Eatonville. She hoped to find a sense of belonging and purpose in their new home. Instead, she found herself isolated and unhappy.

The narrator describes Janie's state of mind as "crushed and defeated." She notes that she "went on back to her house and slept like a rock." Janie's disappointment with Jody is also evident in her physical exhaustion, a sign of her emotional exhaustion.

The reference to the dung hill in this chapter is a metaphor for Janie's state of mind. The narrator notes that Janie feels like she has been "throwed off the dung hill" and left to fend for herself. The dung hill represents the lowest and most degraded place in the community. Furthermore, Janie's feeling of being thrown off it suggests that she feels like she has been cast out from the community and left to fend for herself.

Overall, the reference to the dung hill emphasizes Janie's sense of isolation and abandonment. It also represents the depth of her disappointment with Jody and her current situation.

Explanation:

In this era some facets of the Southern culture were noticeable extremely-- including emphasizing on social position, politeness, and appreciation for experienced individuals and persons with power.

These conceptions likely influenced the judge's apprehension when confronting Emily about the disgusting smell emanating from her house. Possibly, the judge had qualms about irritating or mortifying Emily, who could've been an esteemed resident or dignitary amongst the area.

On top of that, hospitality native to the South may have figured into it, as the judge felt it impolitic or inappropriate to demean or berate Emily concerning the state of her residence.

Learn more about war on

https://brainly.com/question/197175

#SPJ1

Throughout the course, we explored a range of poetic works from different historical periods and cultures, including Medea by Euripides, Shakespeare's sonnets, John Donne's "The Flea," William Butler Yeats' "The Second Coming," and Derek Walcott's "A Far Cry from Africa."

One of the main themes that emerged across these works was the exploration of identity and the complex, sometimes contradictory feelings that arise from being part of a particular culture or community. In "A Far Cry from Africa," for example, Walcott grapples with his mixed heritage as a Caribbean poet with African roots, exploring the tension between his identification with the African continent and the brutality of colonialism that has shaped his identity.

Similarly, in Euripides' Medea, we see the titular character struggling with her identity as a woman in a patriarchal society, and as a foreigner in ancient Greece. Her actions throughout the play reflect her attempts to assert her agency and gain control over her life, despite the limitations placed on her by her gender and status as an outsider.

Another recurring theme in the poetry we read was the exploration of human emotions and the ways in which they can be expressed through language. In Shakespeare's sonnets and John Donne's "The Flea," for example, we see the poets using intricate metaphors and wordplay to explore the complexities of love and desire. Similarly, in Yeats' "The Second Coming," we see the poet using vivid imagery and symbolism to convey a sense of apocalyptic dread and uncertainty in the aftermath of World War I.

Overall, the poetry we read in this course was rich and varied, showcasing the different ways in which poets have used language to explore the complexities of human experience throughout history. Through these works, we were able to gain a deeper appreciation for the power of language and its ability to convey complex emotions and ideas in a way that resonates with readers across time and cultures.

Learn more about literature on

https://brainly.com/question/1374432

#SPJ1

Answer:

I've never seen that before, but I think it might be number 3 that he can and should control his emotions.

We refer to all parts of the vocal apparatus which are involved in speech production as articulators.

The particular vowel sounds in which there is a change in auditory quality within a single syllable are called diphthon. Phonology is the study of the abstract categories that organize the sound system of a language. Two sounds which are distributed in such a way that one can only occur where the other cannot occur are said to be in complementary distribution. Neutralisation refers to the fact that in a particular context, a contrast between phonemes becomes Invisible. Words consisting of only one morpheme are called monomorphemic words. Morphemes that appear only in combination with others, usually free. morphemes are called affixes.

The type of conditioning, in which the distribution of allomorphs is governed by the sound structure, is called phonologically conditioning. The parts of the vocal apparatus which are involved in speech production as articulators.

Learn more about vowel, here:

https://brainly.com/question/11388415

#SPJ1

Answer:

Without a specific passage or text to refer to, I cannot provide a detailed response. However, in general, if an author learns about culture from his grandmother, he may learn through stories, traditions, customs, and values that are passed down from generation to generation. The author may also learn about his family history, heritage, and ancestry through his grandmother's teachings.

To show that this lesson has remained with him into his adult life, the author may demonstrate an appreciation and respect for his cultural heritage in his personal and professional life. He may continue to follow the traditions and customs that were taught to him by his grandmother, or he may share his knowledge and experiences with others to promote cultural understanding and awareness. The author may also reflect on his childhood memories and experiences with his grandmother, and how they have influenced his identity and worldview as an adult.

Explanation:

The author's argument in "Opinion: Emoticons Aren't Ruining Language" is that emoticons, despite being criticized for their negative impact on language and communication, actually serve as valuable tools for enhancing digital communication and conveying meaning that might be lost in purely text-based communication. The author argues that emoticons can help convey tone and emotion in written communication, provide useful visual cues, and promote clearer and more effective communication.

One strength of the argument is that the author presents clear evidence and examples to support their claims, such as citing research that suggests that emoticons can help people accurately interpret tone and emotion in written communication. Additionally, the author acknowledges some of the potential downsides of emoticons, such as their potential overuse, but argues that these issues are relatively minor in comparison to the benefits they provide.

One weakness of the argument is that it focuses primarily on the benefits of emoticons and does not fully address some of the valid concerns that have been raised about their impact on language and communication. For example, some critics argue that emoticons can encourage people to rely too heavily on visual cues rather than developing strong writing skills, and that their use can contribute to a more informal and less professional tone in some contexts.

Overall, the author's argument is persuasive and effectively makes the case for the value of emoticons in digital communication. However, it would be beneficial for the author to acknowledge and address some of the potential drawbacks of emoticons in order to provide a more balanced and nuanced perspective on their impact.

*IG:whis.sama_ent*

Answer:

2 - when does the gym close

3- will be

4 -  you meeting

Explanation:

Answer:

Ernest Hemingway was an American novelist, journalist, and short-story writer. He is considered one of the most influential writers of the 20th century, known for his concise and powerful prose style. He is famous for his novels, including "The Sun Also Rises," "A Farewell to Arms," and "For Whom the Bell Tolls," and his short stories, such as "The Snows of Kilimanjaro" and "The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber." Hemingway was awarded the Pulitzer Prize in 1953 for "The Old Man and the Sea," and in 1954 he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature for his "powerful and style-making mastery of the art of modern narration."

In the story “Excerpt from 100 Days and 99 Nights,” the narrator's point of view about her family situation is one of frustration and feeling burdened by the responsibilities of caring for her younger siblings.

The narrator in  “Excerpt from 100 Days and 99 Nights,” feels like she has no time for herself and that her own needs are being neglected. The narrator is resentful towards her mother for leaving her with so much responsibility.

On the other hand, the speaker in the poem “Rain Check” has a more positive point of view about her family situation. The speaker expresses a desire to spend more time with her family and loved ones, acknowledging that life is short and that we should cherish the time we have with those we love.

These two points of view differ in their tone and perspective. While the narrator in “Excerpt from 100 Days and 99 Nights” feels overwhelmed and burdened by her family situation, the speaker in “Rain Check” expresses a desire to spend more time with her family and values their presence in her life. The narrator in the story is focused on her own needs and desires, while the speaker in the poem is focused on the importance of relationships and connections with others.

Learn more about “Excerpt from 100 Days and 99 Nights” here:

https://brainly.com/question/30921601

#SPJ1

Answer:

phrase: "in American history"

clause: "one of the most significant speeches"

Answer:

D. Unitarianism was less strict and rigid than Puritanism.

Explanation:

The best-supported inference about Unitarianism from the given text is D. Unitarianism was less strict and rigid than Puritanism. The text mentions that Unitarianism was a theological movement that emerged during the 18th century as a reaction against the rigid orthodoxy of Puritanism. The Unitarians rejected the Puritan emphasis on original sin and predestination and instead emphasized the essential goodness of human nature and the power of reason. This suggests that Unitarianism was indeed less strict and rigid than Puritanism. The text does not provide evidence to support options A, B, or C.

Answer:

Explanation:

The 5 physical elements in school include classroom design, lighting, temperature, air quality, and acoustics. These elements are critical for creating a conducive learning environment that promotes quality education.

Explanation:

Rights and responsibilities are closely related to each other and can't be separated. Rights and responsibilities help make our communities better. Rights are freedom we have that are protected. Responsibilities are duties or things that we should do we must understand our rights and responsibilities.

Answer:

It makes your writing interesting.

Explanation:

Varying your sentences when you write has a positive effect on your writing as it makes it more interesting and engaging. Using sentences of different lengths and structures can create a rhythm and flow to your writing, making it easier to read and understand.

It also helps to avoid monotony and makes your writing more memorable. On the other hand, if your writing is overly complicated or dull, it could be due to other factors such as poor organization or lack of clarity in your ideas.

Hope this helps!

"A Tale of Two Cities" is a novel by Charles D i c kens set during the French Revolution.

The story follows the lives of Charles Darnay, a French aristocrat, and Sydney Carton, a dr u nken lawyer. They both fall in love with the same woman, Lucie Manette, who is the daughter of a French doctor.

As the revolution unfolds, Darnay is imprisoned in France and faces execution, but Carton sacrifices himself to take Darnay's place on the guillotine, giving meaning to his previously wasted life. The novel explores themes of sacrifice, redemption, and social injustice.

Read more about Tale of Two Cities here:

https://brainly.com/question/16980248

#SPJ1

There are many sources of inefficiency for water allocation in the U.S., including:

* **Restrictions on transfers:** In many cases, water cannot be transferred from one user to another, even if the transfer would be beneficial to both parties. This can lead to inefficient use of water, as users may not be able to obtain water from the most efficient source.

* **Federal reclamation projects and agricultural water pricing:** The federal government has built a number of dams and canals that provide water for irrigation. The water from these projects is often subsidized, which can lead to inefficient use of water. For example, farmers may use more water than they need because they do not have to pay the full cost of the water.

* **Common property or open access problems:** In some cases, water is a common property resource, meaning that no one owns it. This can lead to problems such as overfishing and overgrazing, as users may not take into account the full costs of their actions.

* **Instream flows:** Instream flows are the minimum amount of water that must be kept in a river or stream to support fish and other aquatic life. In some cases, water is diverted for other uses, such as irrigation or municipal water supply, even though doing so would harm instream flows.

* **Disputes between various agencies and countries over water rights:** There are a number of disputes between various agencies and countries over water rights. For example, there is a dispute between the U.S. and Mexico over the use of water from the Colorado River.

* **Costs of providing water to the public:** The costs of providing water to the public can be high, especially in areas with limited water resources. This can lead to inefficient use of water, as users may not be willing to pay the full cost of water.

* **Municipal and industrial water pricing:** Municipal and industrial water prices are often set below the cost of providing water. This can lead to inefficient use of water, as users may not be aware of the full cost of water.

These are just some of the sources of inefficiency for water allocation in the U.S. Addressing these inefficiencies will be important for ensuring that water is used most efficiently and sustainably possible.

The physician advised Cordelia that B. King Lear shouldn't get overexcited because his health is still precarious.

King Lear is addressed by Cordelia?

Yet when Lear asks, Cordelia responds that she loves him just as a daughter should love her father—neither more nor less. When she marries, she will also have a husband to be devoted to, thus she cannot genuinely show her father all of her love. She then reminds her father of this.

What made Cordelia's response so offensive to King Lear, in your opinion?

What made Cordelia's response so offensive to King Lear, in your opinion? Ans: King Lear was upset by Cordelia's response because his two older daughters had shown him a lot of love, the older one even declaring he was dearer than she.

To know more about King Lear visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31300454

#SPJ1