Answer:
c. O blurred vision is the answer.
Pls help its for a test.
When a court interprets laws in a way that creates or promotes social change and wrestles with moral issues, it is engaging in judicial
A. restraint.
B. review.
C. activism.
D. precedent.
•No ability to tax
•Couldn’t regulate trade
•couldn’t enforce laws
•no national courts system
•no central leadership (executive branch)
•amendments required unanimous approval of 13 states
•no army
Rank the 7 weaknesses above 1-7, with 1 being the most serious, 7 beings the least serious. then explain why you feel your #1 is the most serious.
Answer:
5, 7, 4, 3, 1, 2, 6
Explanation:
If I were to tell my psychiatrist about sexual abuse that happened to me in the past but is no longer continuing, do they legally have to get police involved or no?
Answer Sadly no.
Explanation: The only thing that a psychologist are required by Law to disclose, is information that is currently affecting the patient in a serious manner. Such as specific threats, child abuse if the child is still being harmed or concerns about elder abuse.
With this situation the psychologist can only talk to you about the event.
Also I love psychology and I’m working towards becoming a psychologist.
PLEASE HELP ME I WILL MARK BRAINLIEST
What post-secondary routes (education after high school) could also help you to prepare for this career? Explain or describe. (I want to be a lawyer)
The post secondary route that you would have to take in order to have a career in law would be to apply to Universities for a degree in law. After which you would have to go to a law school.
What is a career?This is the term that has to do with the profession of a person. It is what has to do with what a person would plan to study in order to be certified a professional.
In this situation, you would have to pass all of your SAT and meet with the university requirement to be offered an offer of admission.
Then before you practice law, you would also have to attend a law school and pass all of your bar exams.
Read more on career here: https://brainly.com/question/6947486
#SPJ1
Minor parties usually are willing
to take definite stands on controversial issues. How might
voters react to this tendency?
Voters might react to this tendency as they don't need to win over everyone since they seek to raise awareness of the concerns and they are unlikely to succeed anyhow.
Because of their low levels of support, votes, and funding, certain small parties have a remarkably minimal impact on a nation's politics. Electoral results frequently show that minor parties obtain extremely few votes (to the point of losing any candidate nomination deposit). A powerful opponent of both or several loses because of the existence of a spoiler candidate who attracts votes from a prominent contender with similar political views.
Voters seldom choose third-party and independent candidates, but outsider candidates make their impression by bringing their views to the table. The small candidate who causes this effect is referred to as a "spoiler. Introducing new institutions and ideas into politics is the third parties' most crucial function. Depending on the problem, some folks don't care.
Learn to know more about minor parties on
https://brainly.com/question/17212146
#SPJ9
The majority of cases in the American criminal justice system will proceed to trial.
True
False
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Only about 2% of criminal cases actually go to trial. Most are either pleaded (about 90%) down or dismissed (about 8%). There are lots of legal sites where you can see these stats.
What are some different sentences a criminal might face?
Answer: 5-year sentence, lifetime sentence, and ten-year sentence.
Explanation: Just depends on what the judge decides.
How many state legislatures or conventions must approve an amendment to ratify it?
one-fourth
one-third
two-thirds
three-fourths
Answer:
Three-fourths
Explanation:
Amendments proposed by Congress or convention only become valid when it has been ratified by the legislatures of, or conventions, three-fourths of the states.
Jerry Murray heads a major multinational company. He was elected as a public representative when he ran for the government for the first time. According to institutional anomie theory, what caused him to win the election?
According to institutional anomie theory, When Jerry Murray formerly heads a major multinational company and was eventually elected as a public representative when he ran for the government for the first time, the cause of the victory was that the People believed that the government works better when it runs in a businesslike manner.
What is an institutional anomie theory?The theory of institutional anomie argued that an instrumental crime and violence are a result of weakened social controls that are caused by an imbalance of values favoring the economy. These Anomie caused a new moral standard to emerge which is one that encourages normative flexibility to achieve goal.
It also suggested that high crime rates in America can be attributed to the commitment to the goal of material success. In this regard, a particular emphasis are placed on the motivations derived from the profit goal of economic institutions that dominate the American culture.
Missing options
A.People believed that the government works better when it runs in a businesslike manner.
B.People thought Jerry had potential.
C.People voted for him because he was relatively more educated.
D.People voted randomly.
Read more about institutional anomie theory
brainly.com/question/14587867
#SPJ1
20 Points + Brainliest
Im sorry but I dont have that much more points
Read the passage on the 14th Amendment.
The 14th Amendment was one of three Reconstruction amendments passed after the Civil War. Section 2 of the amendment overturns the three-fifths rule for determining state representation in the US House of Representatives. It also declares that states cannot deny voting rights to male citizens 21 and older unless they have participated in a crime. The voting restriction was meant to punish Confederates for rebelling in the Civil War. However, states have used the restriction to prevent people convicted of crimes from voting. These laws have affected African Americans and Latinos unfairly.
Which statement best explains how states have applied Section 2?
States have allowed people to vote who should not have that right.
States have made every effort to honor the equal protection clause.
States have applied that part of the amendment as it was intended.
States have limited the amendment’s efforts to expand individual rights.
Answer:
States have limited the amendment's efforts to expand individual rights.
Explanation:
A is incorrect because the amendment hasn't allowed people who have committed bad crimes to vote. B is incorrect because if African Americans and Latinos are having the law applied unfairly, then the states haven't made every effort to honor the equal protection clause. C is incorrect because the law was originally to prevent Confederates from voting because of their rebellions in the Civil War. D is the only one left. D is correct because the law was originally meant to punish Confederates for rebelling. The states used it as a way to restrict people who have committed crimes from voting. This makes it so that more people, even if they were a Confederate, can vote, unless they were convicted of a crime.
Hope this helps! :)
A plumber charges $15 per hour and a service fee of $40.
Which equation can be used to find y, the total amount she will charge for x hours of babysitting?
A y = 152-40
By=152 +40
(C) y=40x+15
Dy=40x-15
PLEASE HELPP URGENTTT
U.S. Criminal Justice System, analyze the extent to which our criminal justice system is effective.
Answer: investigating and adjudicating criminal offenses effectively and impartially, while ensuring that the rights of suspects and victims are protected.
Explanation:
What is one way the 14th Amendment protects individual rights?
It guarantees the right of the accused to a speedy and public trial.
It guarantees the right of people to equal protection under the law.
It guarantees the right of people to a jury trial in civil cases over $20.
It guarantees the right of the accused to not testify against themselves.
Answer:
It guarantees the right of people to equal protection under the law.
Explanation:
It states that no matter who you are, even if there are former enslaved individuals, they will be guaranteed equal protection. It basically means no matter what race, or gender you are, you will be treated and have the law applied to you and everyone else equally.
Hope this helps! :)
which option best completes the diagram?
The option that best completes the diagram is: Some leaders support a powerful federal government, while others support states’ rights.
What is a federal government ?A federal system of governance consists of a central administration and several partially autonomous states or provinces that are nested within it. The federal government has more authority than the state or provincial governments in the majority of cases, including the one that exists in the United States.
The national government of the United States consists of the federal government. Its headquarters are in the capital city of the US, Washington, DC. The executive branch, legislative branch, and judicial branch are the three divisions that make up this government.
The Founding Fathers, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison, established the federal government of the United States. The Articles of Confederation, which were first followed by the federal government, were quickly shown to be ineffectual. The Founding Fathers eventually got together to forge a more powerful federal government. They drafted and ratified the Constitution in 1788. For more than 200 years, the US federal government's structure has been based on this constitution.
To know more about federal government, visit :
https://brainly.com/question/10831540
#SPJ13
Why is the appeal process so important to the American criminal justice system?
Answer:
The appeals process is a defining feature of an independent and impartial judiciary. Litigants who are dissatisfied with the outcome at the trial court level can take their case to the appellate level where judges review the record for possible errors.
Explanation:
6.) A suspect was found with a
book of matches (some were
missing) in his pocket. At the
scene of a known arson, matches
were found. Are the matches from
the scene, individual or class
evidence?
Answer: Individual
Explanation: The Matches link the suspect to the arson
Which of the following business transactions is not covered by consumer protection laws?
Buying a car from the dealership
Buying a tv from Best Buy
Buying a used car from your neighbor
Buying a washing machine from Walmart
I THINK ITS CORRECT ANSWER IS......
Buying a used car from your neighbour
A political party is an example of what kind of institution?
A.) metropolitan
B.) mercantilist
C.) linkage
D.) labor
Answer:
C. linkage
Explanation: