2. What personal story does Lou share to illustrate the broken judicial system at
work? Explain and analyze why this story speaks to her point.
3. Were there other jurors that experienced similar feelings of regret and remorse like
Lou? What potential solution was mentioned that would allow the jurors to better cope
with their duty? Discuss your thoughts on this,
4. What sentence could Lou's granddaughter not answer? Explain the context and discuss
whether you could answer this question or not. What coping mechanism has Lou
employed to deal with the residual feelings of her juror experience? Discuss.
5. What are your thoughts on the death penalty? Do you believe that people are less likely
to commit murder or violent crimes in states that have the death penalty? Evaluate and
explain

Answer:

the country is divided!!!

Explanation:

some shops want to open up and others are closing down. the government is making it look like a bigger issue than it really is.  all this is hurting little business and all the people people are afraid of going outside you have to wear a mask when you meet people all this is unnecessary.  

Answer:

yeah...

Explanation:

its the hard truth. I should have known that gave you my heart but you messed around and broke that.

The prosecution may not include evidence that was collected in violation of the law during the trial, according to a motion for suppression. A motion for continuation asks the judge to adjourn the case. Motion for discovery: asks the judge to provide the defense.

Every party needs time to plan, and that time should include time to plan a response to what the opposing side has said. A motion to discover is an application to the court for a ruling ordering the other side to turn over evidence. An interview with a potential witness is requested in a motion to depose.

Pre-trial motions frequently used include: An attempt to have a charge or the case dismissed by the judge is known as a motion to dismiss. This is possible if there is insufficient proof or if the alleged facts do not constitute a crime. An effort to prevent specific statements or evidence from being presented as evidence is known as a motion to suppress.

To know more about prosecution visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30348962

#SPJ1

Answer: I would say Damage

Explanation: cause if the suspect or murder damage somethin with their own hands their would be fingerprints on them

Answer: The Twentieth Amendment is your answer.

Explanation: Hope my answer helped you! Plz, mark my answer helped you and Thank you!

Answer:

The United States Constitution has had influence internationally on later constitutions and legal thinking. Its influence appears in similarities of phrasing and borrowed passages in other constitutions. As well as in the principles of the rule of law. Separation of powers and recognition of individual rights.

Answer:

After the Cold War ended, promoting the international spread of democracy seemed poised to replace containment as the guiding principle of U.S. foreign policy. Scholars, policymakers, and commentators embraced the idea that democratization could become America's next mission. In recent years, however, critics have argued that spreading democracy may be unwise or even harmful. This paper addresses this debate. It argues that the United States should promote democracy and refutes some of the most important arguments against U.S. efforts to spread democracy. After a brief discussion of definitions of democracy and liberalism, the paper summarizes the reasons why the spread of democracy— especially liberal democracy— benefits the citizens of new democracies, promotes international peace, and serves U.S. interests. Because the case for democratization is rarely made comprehensively, the paper explicates the arguments for why democracy promotes liberty, prevents famines, and fosters economic development. The logic and evidence of a democratic peace are also summarized, as are the ways in which U.S. security and economic interests would be advanced in a world of democracies. These benefits to U.S. interests include a reduction in threats to the United States, fewer refugees attempting to enter the United States, and better economic partners for American trade and investment. The paper then turns to a rebuttal of four prominent recent arguments against the benefits of spreading democracy: (1) the claim that the democratic peace is a myth; (2) the argument that the process of democratization increases the risk of war; (3) arguments that democratic elections are harmful in societies that are not fully liberal; and (4) claims that "Asian values" can undergird polities based on "soft authoritarianism" that are superior to liberal democracies. The paper argues that these recent critiques of U.S. efforts to promote democracy have not presented a convincing case that spreading democracy is a bad idea. The internationa spread of democracy will offer many benefits to new democracies and to the United States. The democratic peace proposition appears robust, even if scholars need to continue to develop multiple explanations for why democracies rarely, if ever, go to war. The evidence on whether democratization increases the risk of war is mixed, at best, and policies can be crafted to minimize any risks of conflict in these cases. The problem of "illiberal democracy" has been exaggerated; democratic elections usually do more good than harm. The United States should, however, aim to promote liberal values as well as electoral democracy. And the "soft authoritarian" challenge to liberal democracy was not persuasive, even before the Asian economic turmoil of 1997 and 1998 undermined claims for the superiority of "Asian values."

Introduction

In recent years, however, many writers have criticized the idea that the United States should attempt to spread democracy. The Clinton administration's commitment to spreading democracy seems to have faltered, and critics from across the political spectrum have argued that the United States should scale back or abandon efforts to foster global democratization.4 In a prominent article, Robert Kaplan has argued that holding democratic elections in many countries may actually hinder efforts to maintain ethnic peace, social stability, and economic development.5 Fareed Zakaria has suggested that elections in countries without liberal values create illiberal democracies, which pose grave threats to freedom.6

This paper argues that the United States should make promoting democracy abroad one of its central foreign-policy goals. Democracy is not an unalloyed good and the United States should not blindly attempt to spread democracy to the exclusion of all other goals, but U.S. and global interests would be advanced if the world contained more democracies. It often will be difficult for the United States and other actors to help countries to become democracies, but international efforts frequently can make a difference. The United States can promote democracy. In many cases it should.

I develop the argument for promoting democracy in three parts. The first section of this paper defines democracy and the closely related concept of liberalism. It distinguishes between democratic procedures of government and the political philosophy of liberalism, but also explains how the two are closely linked.

Explanation:

Answer:

no nobody should take anybody's life leave that to the lord

Explanation:

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Hopefully this helps.

Answer: lying about military service

Explanation:

Answer:

Legislation .

Explanation:

This table breaks down the bills and resolutions introduced in each two-year ... Therefore, the generally decreasing number of bills enacted into law does not reflect ... Congress, Enacted Laws, Passed Resolutions, Got A Vote, Failed Legislation ... cumulative percent of bills enacted for December in the first year of a session

Answer:

2 by a specially elected tribunal

Answer:

who should i be??? idek

Explanation:

Answer:

A. crime is too widely dispersed for a limited number of police officers and vigilantes

Explanation:

I think it's A because we don't have much police officers that are always available to help others and they don't always come on time. So in conclusion this is a ineffective crime prevention strategy. -I hope this helped answer your question.

Answer:

put your hands up with your pome facing them

Explanation:

A common misconception surrounding drug addiction is that it solely affects the life of the user. However, the idea that they aren’t hurting anyone except for themselves is an excuse that many individuals who abuse drugs use in order to justify their addiction. Drug addiction is not a one-person phenomenon, and it creates a domino effect on the lives of those around them. It is a social problem that normalizes drug use and affects individuals and their families.

Effects of Drug Addiction

At first glance, a drug addiction may appear to only affect the person who is using. However, because addiction is a destructive issue that can have an adverse effect on the community, family, and individual, it’s very rare that other people aren’t affected. An individual neglecting their responsibilities as a result of drugs can negatively affect their career, children’s education, or family’s financial security. Their impact can also extend outside of the immediate family. Friends or community members who rely on their presence or companionship can suffer from their absence.

There are a variety of short-term and long-term health effects associated with addiction. Although the specific effects vary between drugs, prolonged abuse of any substance can lead to chronic disease or alter an individual’s productivity. The most permanent effect of drug addiction is death, which becomes more likely through addiction because of increased tolerance leading to overdose.

The Connection Between Addiction and Crime

There is a definitive link between crime and drug addictions that is mainly contributed to the illegal status of commonly abused drugs. Not only is it illegal to carry many of these drugs but an individual’s lowered inhibitions when under the influence can encourage them to commit other crimes. The types of crime that an individual may commit when on drugs is extensive and dependent on a variety of sub-factors, but regardless, drug users are more likely than nonusers to commit crime. Petty theft in order to obtain drugs and satiate their cravings when desperate is another way in which drugs influence individuals to commit crimes.

How Drug Rehabilitation Can Better Society

There are two types of people: those who believe that drug addiction treatment should be given to everyone, and those who think that drug addiction shouldn’t be treated as a criminal issue. Ultimately, it doesn’t matter who suffers from addiction, criminal or not. With the proper help and treatment, you will be able to overcome your addiction and fit into society once again. Due to the process of drug rehabilitation, there is almost a countless number of people who took the necessary steps to beat their crippling addiction and even become pillars of various communities. Some individuals have managed to procure fantastic jobs and live healthy, drug-free jobs.

Unfortunately, drug addiction is still in society. Once an addiction starts, it can become very difficult for you to come back from it. With that said, you don’t have to fight it alone. Don’t be ashamed to tell people of your addiction. Many people are going through or have gone through the same thing. You will need the support of your family, friends and even the professionals treating you. If you or someone you know is suffering from an addiction, asking for help is the first step to regaining control of your life.

PLEASE MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST

Answer:

I need help with this,

Explanation:

How has the American model of democracy affected the cause of civil rights around the world? (I need a CONCLUSION for this question)

Answer:

sovereignty, land, population, and government.

Answer:

The nation state is a system of organization defined by geography, politics, and culture. The nation is cultural identity that is shared by the people, and the state is the governing administration. A nation state must have a shared national identity, physical borders, and a single government.

Thank you and please rate me as brainliest as it will help me to level up

Answer:

D.Adversarial

Explanation:

Answer:

Adversarial

Explanation:

"The American legal system is known as an adversarial due process system. In order to understand what this means, it is helpful to take each term on its own. Once you understand each term, you can combine them to understand what this description of the American legal system truly means. Adversarial means that, within the context of a court case, the two sides are adversaries, or opponents. "

Answer:

people from the Mayflower

Explanation:

The Mayflower people were the first settlers to create modern correctional institutions, in addition to being the first colony to establish a type of government that most closely resembles what we have today. This made the Mayflower colony a major advance in world democracy, laying the foundations for the entire political and judicial system that the United States currently has.

Answer:

a

Explanation:

I mean I'm not sure answer at your own risk

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Locard’s exchange principle says that, in the physical world, whenever perpetrators enter or leave a crime scene, they will leave something behind and take something with them.

Answer:

C. He insisted on the right of the accused to have a defense lawyer.

Explanation:

Answer: c.

Explanation:

Answer:

they are bystantders and they should be fired

Explanation:

Answer:

a deck of cards.

Explanation:

Answer: The four characteristics of a nation-state are sovereignty, Currency, population, and system of laws.

Answer:

Both houses must accept the bill

Explanation:

Before a bill can be passed on to the president to either veto or pass, it must first be approved by both the House and the Senate. The houses generally hash out their differences, rewrite the bill, and provide the final draft to the president who can then either veto the bill or pass it. There are also other ways in which a bill can be passed if the president vetoes it. For example, the chamber that originated the legislation can attempt to override the veto by a vote of two-thirds of those present.

Answer:

In the United States, state police power comes from the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution, which gives states the rights and powers "not delegated to the United States." States are thus granted the power to establish and enforce laws protecting the welfare, safety, and health of the public.

Explanation:

free medication for all

abortion should be the woman's choice, not yours

if people come to seek asylum, they should be offered a home and jobs, especially if they're willing to work and contribute to our country