a. Yes, there is an improvement in productivity as the output increased from 90 to 110 pcs.
b. Labor Productivity: 11 pcs/hour. Multifactor Productivity: 0.88 pcs/(BD 11.75) per day. Productivity Improvement: 22.2% increase.
c. Engr Ulymarl's action improved productivity by increasing output per hour and overall efficiency, leading to positive results and potentially better profitability.
a. Yes, there is an improvement in productivity with the changes implemented by the process engineer. The output increased from 90 to 110 pcs, indicating higher productivity.
b. To prove the improvement in productivity, we can calculate the following metrics:
Labor Productivity: Divide the output (110 pcs) by the labor hours (10 hours) to obtain the labor productivity per hour .Labor Productivity = Output / Labor Hours
Multifactor Productivity: Sum up the costs of materials, additional supplies, labor, energy, and water, and divide the output (110 pcs) by the total cost to calculate the multifactor productivity.Multifactor Productivity = Output / (Material Cost + Additional Supplies.
Cost + Labor Cost + Energy Cost + Water Cost)
Productivity Improvement: Compare the initial and improved productivity measures to determine the percentage increase.Productivity Improvement = ((Improved Productivity - Initial
roductivity) / Initial Productivity) * 100
c. Engr Ulymarl's action resulted in a significant improvement in productivity. The increased output per hour of labor indicates higher efficiency. The labor productivity, multifactor productivity, and productivity improvement calculations would provide concrete evidence of the positive impact of the process flow changes. The proposed actions by Engr Ulymarl have successfully enhanced productivity, leading to better output and potentially higher profitability for the company.
For more such question on productivity
https://brainly.com/question/21044460
#SPJ8
After sending a business e-mail, how long should you generally wait before following up for a response? Select one.
Question 7 options:
It’s never good etiquette to follow up
End of business day
24 hours
48 hours
After sending a business email, we have to wait for : End of business day.
After sending a business email, it is generally considered appropriate to wait until the end of the business day before following up for a response. This allows the recipient sufficient time to review their emails and respond accordingly. By waiting until the end of the business day, you demonstrate patience and respect for the recipient's schedule and workload.It's important to note that the appropriate timeframe for following up may vary depending on the urgency and nature of the email. If the matter is time-sensitive or requires immediate attention, it may be appropriate to follow up sooner, such as within a few hours or by the next business day.It's worth considering any specific instructions or expectations provided by the recipient or your company's communication protocols. Some organizations may have defined response timeframes or guidelines for follow-ups that you should adhere to.It's essential to strike a balance between being proactive and respectful of the recipient's time and workload when deciding when to follow up on a business email.The correct option is: End of business day.
For more such questions on business email
https://brainly.com/question/30129889
#SPJ8
Need help with this python question I’m stuck
It should be noted that the program based on the information is given below
How to depict the programdef classify_interstate_highway(highway_number):
"""Classifies an interstate highway as primary or auxiliary, and if auxiliary, indicates what primary highway it serves. Also indicates if the (primary) highway runs north/south or east/west.
Args:
highway_number: The number of the interstate highway.
Returns:
A tuple of three elements:
* The type of the highway ('primary' or 'auxiliary').
* If the highway is auxiliary, the number of the primary highway it serves.
* The direction of travel of the primary highway ('north/south' or 'east/west').
Raises:
ValueError: If the highway number is not a valid interstate highway number.
"""
if not isinstance(highway_number, int):
raise ValueError('highway_number must be an integer')
if highway_number < 1 or highway_number > 999:
raise ValueError('highway_number must be between 1 and 999')
if highway_number < 100:
type_ = 'primary'
direction = 'north/south' if highway_number % 2 == 1 else 'east/west'
else:
type_ = 'auxiliary'
primary_number = highway_number % 100
direction = 'north/south' if primary_number % 2 == 1 else 'east/west'
return type_, primary_number, direction
def main():
highway_number = input('Enter an interstate highway number: ')
type_, primary_number, direction = classify_interstate_highway(highway_number)
print('I-{} is {}'.format(highway_number, type_))
if type_ == 'auxiliary':
print('It serves I-{}'.format(primary_number))
print('It runs {}'.format(direction))
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
Learn more about program on
https://brainly.com/question/26642771
#SPJ1